Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC... show more

Aaron Rupar

1,126,289 subscribers

792,502 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…

MJTruthUltra

440,571 views • 5 months ago

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

unusual_whales

356,379 views • 5 months ago

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

CSPAN

678,158 views • 5 months ago

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Acyn

1,816,131 views • 5 months ago

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

Decensored News

24,333 views • 5 months ago

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.

Acyn

455,976 views • 5 months ago

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:

CNN

238,359 views • 5 months ago

OSSOFF: was there an imminent threat yes or no TULSI: the president decides that OSSOFF: no that’s literally your job

OSSOFF: was there an imminent threat yes or no TULSI: the president decides that OSSOFF: no that’s literally your job

Adam Mockler

18,574 views • 5 months ago

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Aaron Rupar

228,697 views • 4 months ago

BLITZER: Trump has said there was an 'imminent threat' from Iran. What's your understanding of that threat? REP. STUTZMAN: I think the imminent threat is they were going to continue to build -- rebuild -- their nuclear program BLITZER: But Trump said the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated.' So why the need to attack?

BLITZER: Trump has said there was an 'imminent threat' from Iran. What's your understanding of that threat? REP. STUTZMAN: I think the imminent threat is they were going to continue to build -- rebuild -- their nuclear program BLITZER: But Trump said the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated.' So why the need to attack?

Aaron Rupar

108,069 views • 5 months ago

Sen. Warner: "In your printed testimony today, your last paragraph on page 6, 'As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There's been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability.' You omitted that from your oral opening. Is that because the president said there was an imminent threat two weeks ago?" Gabbard: "No, sir. I recognized that the time was running long and I skipped through some of the portion of my oral delivered remarks." Warner: "You chose to omit the parts that contradict the president."

Sen. Warner: "In your printed testimony today, your last paragraph on page 6, 'As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There's been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability.' You omitted that from your oral opening. Is that because the president said there was an imminent threat two weeks ago?" Gabbard: "No, sir. I recognized that the time was running long and I skipped through some of the portion of my oral delivered remarks." Warner: "You chose to omit the parts that contradict the president."

The Bulwark

35,534 views • 5 months ago

Ossoff: I think we have to step back and recognize that this entire war is based on lies. They told us last year that the Iranian nuclear threat was obliterated. Then they told us earlier this year that there was an imminent nuclear threat. On day four of this war, President Trump declared victory. Months ago, Hegseth said that all of our objectives had been achieved. The war continues. Iran still has its uranium. Hormuz remains closed. This is a complete fiasco. It is a catastrophic failure by the commander in chief personally and his entire national security team.

Ossoff: I think we have to step back and recognize that this entire war is based on lies. They told us last year that the Iranian nuclear threat was obliterated. Then they told us earlier this year that there was an imminent nuclear threat. On day four of this war, President Trump declared victory. Months ago, Hegseth said that all of our objectives had been achieved. The war continues. Iran still has its uranium. Hormuz remains closed. This is a complete fiasco. It is a catastrophic failure by the commander in chief personally and his entire national security team.

Acyn

170,604 views • 11 days ago

Bera: There is no imminent threat of nuclear breakout. Did you deliver that assessment to the president? Gabbard: I have delivered the intelligence community’s assessment to the president.

Bera: There is no imminent threat of nuclear breakout. Did you deliver that assessment to the president? Gabbard: I have delivered the intelligence community’s assessment to the president.

Acyn

26,365 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: DNI TULSI GABBARD GOES FULL PRO-TRUMP — DROPS A MASSIVE TRUTH BOMB! “The ONLY person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the PRESIDENT!”

🚨 BREAKING: DNI TULSI GABBARD GOES FULL PRO-TRUMP — DROPS A MASSIVE TRUTH BOMB! “The ONLY person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the PRESIDENT!”

Gunther Eagleman™

170,796 views • 5 months ago

OSSOFF: You stated on the 14th day of this conflict that Iran's military was 'destroyed.' Was that an accurate statement -- yes or no? HEGSETH: Iran's ability to challenge the US-- OSSOFF: That's not what I asked. Yes or no? HEGSETH: What the milit--- OSSOFF: Will you answer the question?

OSSOFF: You stated on the 14th day of this conflict that Iran's military was 'destroyed.' Was that an accurate statement -- yes or no? HEGSETH: Iran's ability to challenge the US-- OSSOFF: That's not what I asked. Yes or no? HEGSETH: What the milit--- OSSOFF: Will you answer the question?

Aaron Rupar

355,791 views • 1 month ago

Spy chief Tulsi Gabbard dodged questions about the severity of the threat posed by Iran in Senate testimony on Wednesday. Gabbard declined to say whether she thought Iran represented an “imminent nuclear threat” to the US, as the White House has claimed

Spy chief Tulsi Gabbard dodged questions about the severity of the threat posed by Iran in Senate testimony on Wednesday. Gabbard declined to say whether she thought Iran represented an “imminent nuclear threat” to the US, as the White House has claimed

Bloomberg

22,540 views • 5 months ago

Iran was not days or weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, the head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog Rafael Grossi told Becky Anderson today, contradicting a US claim that Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat.

Iran was not days or weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, the head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog Rafael Grossi told Becky Anderson today, contradicting a US claim that Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat.

CNN International PR

305,339 views • 5 months ago

Rep. Carson: "Is there any evidence that Iran intended to conduct a preemptive attack on the United States?" Gabbard: "The president is responsible for what is an imminent threat."

Rep. Carson: "Is there any evidence that Iran intended to conduct a preemptive attack on the United States?" Gabbard: "The president is responsible for what is an imminent threat."

The American Conservative

27,566 views • 5 months ago

"The hypocrisy is blindingly obvious." Trump says the joint U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran will "eliminate" the imminent threat of a nuclear bomb. But Iran does not have nuclear weapons. The only country in the Middle East that does is ... Israel.

"The hypocrisy is blindingly obvious." Trump says the joint U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran will "eliminate" the imminent threat of a nuclear bomb. But Iran does not have nuclear weapons. The only country in the Middle East that does is ... Israel.

AJ+

26,249 views • 5 months ago

Bolton on Iran: I don’t think there was an imminent threat. But I don’t think the US has to wait until a threat is imminent. When people ask me how soon Iran could get nuclear weapons, the real answer is 72 hours. That possibility exists to this very day. 1/

Bolton on Iran: I don’t think there was an imminent threat. But I don’t think the US has to wait until a threat is imminent. When people ask me how soon Iran could get nuclear weapons, the real answer is 72 hours. That possibility exists to this very day. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

35,069 views • 4 months ago