Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Two cases. Same judge. Same week. Abdul Abubakar Ali’s nonprofit pocketed $3 million meant to feed kids. Served zero meals. Prosecutors asked for 3.5 years. He got one. Zamzam Jama laundered $491,000 from the same scheme. Bought a house. Bought a car. Six months. Both sentences below federal guidelines....

59,809 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 FBI Director Kash Patel: From “Reformer” to Jet-Setting Hypocrite? As if the weaponization scandals weren’t enough… new reports claim FBI Director Kash Patel Patel used an FBI Gulfstream V to fly his country singer girlfriend to a concert - complete with a luxury suite reportedly costing $35,000+ - before flying her home on the same government jet. And that wasn’t all. The same week, Patel reportedly received a VIP snorkel tour at the underwater tomb of 900 sailors and Marines at Pearl Harbor... Now backlash is coming from former FBI insiders themselves: FBI whistleblower Phil Kennedy posted: “I’m one of the FBI whistleblowers who helped Kash Patel get his job. I’m sorry.” Then former FBI agent and whistleblower dropped even more allegations: - Patel promised reform, declassification, and an end to FBI weaponization - The Epstein list? “Tossed aside.” - Deep State accountability? Gone. Friend also slammed reports that Patel’s 26-year-old girlfriend allegedly received a full-time FBI SWAT security detail costing taxpayers nearly $1 MILLION per year. “He’s more interested in living the life of a billionaire.” Friend further accused Patel of inflating FBI child rescue statistics by repackaging National Center for Missing & Exploited Children data as FBI accomplishments - while constantly promoting the numbers online. Americans were promised reform. Instead, critics say the FBI just got a new face with the same old perks.

LindellTV

17,345 views • 2 months ago

Judge Juan Merchan has ordered Donald Trump to be sentenced for 34 counts on January 10th ahead of inauguration Judge Merchan was never supposed to oversee Donald Trump’s case, he was specifically assigned the case to weaponize our legal system against Trump, here’s the proof “Understand there's absolutely no reason that Judge Merchan should have even had a chance to be assigned to this case? Now, I'm sure the left is just gonna call this a conspiracy theory. ‌ So I'll issue a challenge to them, and maybe they can tell me how he managed to be the judge. Because for these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. ‌ That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. So even though they're trying to claim that they didn't pick the judge, that it was randomly assigned, that's not possible because judge Merchan isn't in the pool to be randomly assigned. So the only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. ‌ And the wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. ‌ So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats. ‌ But, yeah, I'm sure this was just a coincidence. It was a coincidence that one of the most high profile cases ever, we didn't assign a judge, we assigned an acting judge. ‌ And that that judge somehow got selected even though he wasn't in the pool of judges available to be selected, and that that same judge that was selected also caught 2 other Trump related cases in the same year, and then that judge's daughter makes tens of millions of dollars a year promoting Democrats. Yeah. I'm sure that's all a coincidence.”

Wall Street Apes

514,459 views • 1 year ago

Ohio County judge gets arrested but expects special treatment. This is the wild story of Portage County Judge Rebecca Doherty, whose OVI arrest became a viral lesson in how not to handle a police encounter. ​After crashing her SUV into a ditch on a snowy night in Brimfield Township, Ohio, the "impartial" judge immediately tried to play the "who you know" card. From the jump, her behavior was anything but professional: ​ Almost immediately, she identified herself by her title, clearly hoping her status as a Common Pleas Judge would end the investigation right there. It does not stop there as she continues to name drop in her booking. ​ She was uncooperative during field sobriety tests and flat-out refused a breathalyzer. Perhaps the most jarring part of the booking was when she asked for her phone, only for the officer to inform her it was currently sitting in a puddle of vomit inside her vehicle. ​ Throughout the process, she repeatedly demanded that officers "Call Larry," referring to a local county sheriff's office friend, appearing to expect a workaround to the standard booking procedure. ​Because she was a sitting judge, a visiting judge was brought in to handle the sentencing to ensure there was no bias. She was sentenced to 180 days in jail, with 177 days suspended. ​ She served 3 days in a driver intervention program, paid a $375 fine, and had her driver’s license suspended for one year. ​Despite the public outcry and the viral footage showing her in a less-than-judicial state, Doherty eventually returned to the bench to finish her term after issuing a public apology. ​Does a "Judge" title mean you should get a pass, or should they be held to a higher standard?

Giggling Ganon

66,205 views • 2 months ago

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel “I'm calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant's Daughter's company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father's courtroom - I wanna know the bank records because money doesn't lie - I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction - Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“ That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.

Wall Street Apes

3,331,395 views • 1 year ago

This judge unloaded on this predator in a way you wish every judge would. If you want to see what a "zero tolerance" policy looks like in practice, look no further than Judge Jennifer Branch in Hamilton County. During the sentencing of Mick McFadden, the courtroom atmosphere shifted from procedural to powerful as the Judge delivered a verbal takedown that is now making waves across the judicial system. ​McFadden appeared in court facing charges for the horrific abuse of two young children, ages four and six, who were left in his care. While some hearings feel like a formality, Judge Branch made sure this one felt like a reckoning. Here is exactly how the hammer came down: ​The Verbal Blast: Judge Branch didn't just read the sentence; she dismantled the defendant’s character. She famously stated, "This court is so sick and tired of seeing adults ruin and abuse children," before delivering the line of the year: "There are no free passes in my courtroom." ​Maximum Sentencing: She didn't settle for the middle ground. McFadden was handed 11 years for each count, the absolute maximum allowed by law. ​Consecutive, Not Concurrent: In a move that ensures he stays behind bars for the long haul, the judge ordered the sentences to be served consecutively. Instead of a 11-year stint, he’s looking at 22 years in a state facility. ​Lifetime Accountability: Upon any eventual release, McFadden is hit with a Tier 3 Sex Offender status. This means life-long registration with mandatory in-person check-ins every 90 days. ​Judge Branch is proving that the bench isn't just for interpreting law—it’s for protecting the most vulnerable and making sure predators have nowhere to hide. This is exactly the kind of energy we need in the justice system.

Giggling Ganon

370,887 views • 2 months ago