Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Two great points made: First, a judicial discharge in a case does not translate into administrative competence. Kejriwal rose on the idealised narrative of a middle-class, educated outsider entering politics to reform the system, yet over time became indistinguishable from the very political culture he claimed to oppose. High...

theskindoctor13's profile picture

THE SKIN DOCTOR

902,630 subscribers

52,560 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Arvind Kejriwal built his political brand on claims of delivering “world-class” education. First in Delhi, and now in Punjab, the same narrative is being repeated. But slogans and publicity cannot substitute for outcomes. Instead of exporting a carefully curated image, he should answer basic questions about the quality of education, learning outcomes, teacher vacancies, school infrastructure, and governance where his party is in power. Grand claims lose credibility when the ground reality tells a different story. Before lecturing the country, and the world, on every issue under the sun, Kejriwal should focus on fixing education and governance in Punjab. Good governance is measured by results, not relentless self-promotion.
2:01

Arvind Kejriwal built his political brand on claims of delivering “world-class” education. First in Delhi, and now in Punjab, the same narrative is being repeated. But slogans and publicity cannot substitute for outcomes. Instead of exporting a carefully curated image, he should answer basic questions about the quality of education, learning outcomes, teacher vacancies, school infrastructure, and governance where his party is in power. Grand claims lose credibility when the ground reality tells a different story. Before lecturing the country, and the world, on every issue under the sun, Kejriwal should focus on fixing education and governance in Punjab. Good governance is measured by results, not relentless self-promotion.

Amit Malviya

32,311 views • 29 days ago

‼️#MafiaState 1️⃣3️⃣ Direkt36’s new documentary “The Trap” is a blunt account of how Viktor Orbán wasted the biggest political and financial opportunity Hungary has seen in 100 years. In 2010, he had a two-thirds majority, full institutional control, a global recovery, and an unprecedented flood of EU money. It was the perfect moment for structural modernisation. Here is what happened instead: Political system: Expert governance was replaced by centralised political control. Institutions were subordinated to loyalty. Policy became a tool of power consolidation. The system increasingly served the ruling circle, not long-term national strategy. Corruption and patronage: EU funds became the financial engine of a patronage state. The film shows systematic overpricing, politically connected beneficiaries, and absurd prestige projects. Money that could have rebuilt hospitals and schools financed vanity investments and power networks. The NER structure grew directly on EU cash. Economy: Growth in the mid-2010s was real, but it was fuelled by EU transfers and cheap central bank credit. It did not translate into deep productivity reform. The boom masked structural fragility. Education: The system was centralised and politicised. Modern skill development lagged. PISA scores fell. Teacher shortages worsened. Young educators left the profession. Long-term human capital was neglected. Healthcare: Grand reform promises were made in 2011. Structural change stalled. Primary care was not meaningfully strengthened. Public healthcare spending remains among the lowest in the EU relative to GDP. The system survives, but it was not rebuilt. Transport: Billions went into highways. Rail was chronically underfunded. Ageing locomotives, patchwork fixes, and ad-hoc solutions became standard. Strategy gave way to optics. The documentary’s conclusion is harsh: Hungary had the mandate, the money, and the momentum. Instead of modernising the country, the regime built a durable power structure. That is the trap.
1:10

‼️#MafiaState 1️⃣3️⃣ Direkt36’s new documentary “The Trap” is a blunt account of how Viktor Orbán wasted the biggest political and financial opportunity Hungary has seen in 100 years. In 2010, he had a two-thirds majority, full institutional control, a global recovery, and an unprecedented flood of EU money. It was the perfect moment for structural modernisation. Here is what happened instead: Political system: Expert governance was replaced by centralised political control. Institutions were subordinated to loyalty. Policy became a tool of power consolidation. The system increasingly served the ruling circle, not long-term national strategy. Corruption and patronage: EU funds became the financial engine of a patronage state. The film shows systematic overpricing, politically connected beneficiaries, and absurd prestige projects. Money that could have rebuilt hospitals and schools financed vanity investments and power networks. The NER structure grew directly on EU cash. Economy: Growth in the mid-2010s was real, but it was fuelled by EU transfers and cheap central bank credit. It did not translate into deep productivity reform. The boom masked structural fragility. Education: The system was centralised and politicised. Modern skill development lagged. PISA scores fell. Teacher shortages worsened. Young educators left the profession. Long-term human capital was neglected. Healthcare: Grand reform promises were made in 2011. Structural change stalled. Primary care was not meaningfully strengthened. Public healthcare spending remains among the lowest in the EU relative to GDP. The system survives, but it was not rebuilt. Transport: Billions went into highways. Rail was chronically underfunded. Ageing locomotives, patchwork fixes, and ad-hoc solutions became standard. Strategy gave way to optics. The documentary’s conclusion is harsh: Hungary had the mandate, the money, and the momentum. Instead of modernising the country, the regime built a durable power structure. That is the trap.

Pete

60,514 views • 6 months ago

The grubby deal Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael struck with Michael Lowry involved the appointment of a record number of Super Junior Ministers. We had to see clarity from the courts on this. No one in political life should have the opportunity to play fast and loose with the Constitution in order to get the political outcomes that they desire. It matters that we have good governance. The Court has given a lengthy judgement today. We will consider it over Christmas and decide on our next steps. We will never stop challenging the stroke politics of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael.
1:22

The grubby deal Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael struck with Michael Lowry involved the appointment of a record number of Super Junior Ministers. We had to see clarity from the courts on this. No one in political life should have the opportunity to play fast and loose with the Constitution in order to get the political outcomes that they desire. It matters that we have good governance. The Court has given a lengthy judgement today. We will consider it over Christmas and decide on our next steps. We will never stop challenging the stroke politics of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael.

Mary Lou McDonald

20,548 views • 7 months ago

🚨 FARAGE IS FILLING REFORM WITH THE SAME FAILURES WHO BROKE BRITAIN You do not fix a broken system by recycling the people who built it. Voters can see straight through that. Nadhim Zahawi is not a fresh start for Reform UK. He is a symbol of everything that went wrong. Ben Habib just said it plainly: Zahawi is part of the problem, not the solution. This is the same man who: • Backed mass immigration • Wanted amnesty for illegal entrants • Pushed remittances to Somalia over British taxpayers • Was forced out of government over tax affairs • Enforced vaccine passports and mRNA mandates A globalist technocrat, not a patriot. And yet Nigel Farage has welcomed him into Reform. Why? Because Reform is no longer trying to clean out the stables. It is trying to absorb the establishment and rebrand it. Habib nailed it: Reform has taken in dozens of failed Tory MPs — the very people who created Britain’s crisis. That is not reform. That is political recycling. You cannot claim to oppose mass migration while recruiting its advocates. You cannot claim to oppose medical authoritarianism while embracing its enforcers. You cannot claim to be anti-globalist while elevating globalists. Reform UK is not replacing the system. It is repainting it. And the British people deserve better than a new logo on the same broken machine. Advance UK Ben Habib
4:47

🚨 FARAGE IS FILLING REFORM WITH THE SAME FAILURES WHO BROKE BRITAIN You do not fix a broken system by recycling the people who built it. Voters can see straight through that. Nadhim Zahawi is not a fresh start for Reform UK. He is a symbol of everything that went wrong. Ben Habib just said it plainly: Zahawi is part of the problem, not the solution. This is the same man who: • Backed mass immigration • Wanted amnesty for illegal entrants • Pushed remittances to Somalia over British taxpayers • Was forced out of government over tax affairs • Enforced vaccine passports and mRNA mandates A globalist technocrat, not a patriot. And yet Nigel Farage has welcomed him into Reform. Why? Because Reform is no longer trying to clean out the stables. It is trying to absorb the establishment and rebrand it. Habib nailed it: Reform has taken in dozens of failed Tory MPs — the very people who created Britain’s crisis. That is not reform. That is political recycling. You cannot claim to oppose mass migration while recruiting its advocates. You cannot claim to oppose medical authoritarianism while embracing its enforcers. You cannot claim to be anti-globalist while elevating globalists. Reform UK is not replacing the system. It is repainting it. And the British people deserve better than a new logo on the same broken machine. Advance UK Ben Habib

Jim Ferguson

28,469 views • 7 months ago

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has insisted he has "done no wrongdoing" and "followed the rules" after it emerged that he had failed to register gifts provided by a crypto tycoon who had been convicted of wire fraud in the US. A report in the Sunday Times said George Cottrell provided security and social media staff for Farage the year before he became an MP, as well as accommodation. Reform UK has claimed the benefits were personal gifts and not political.
0:29

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has insisted he has "done no wrongdoing" and "followed the rules" after it emerged that he had failed to register gifts provided by a crypto tycoon who had been convicted of wire fraud in the US. A report in the Sunday Times said George Cottrell provided security and social media staff for Farage the year before he became an MP, as well as accommodation. Reform UK has claimed the benefits were personal gifts and not political.

Channel 4 News

27,174 views • 1 month ago

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."
2:34

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

Press Trust of India

99,583 views • 5 months ago

Delhi: On the Delhi Court discharging AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia in the Excise Policy case, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi says, "It is a very important judgment... Discharge means there is not even a case for which charges can be framed. This means there is no case to answer that is worth even framing charges. We are not talking about conviction or acquittal after trial; we are talking about a situation where the court finds that there is not even a case to answer..."
2:23

Delhi: On the Delhi Court discharging AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia in the Excise Policy case, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi says, "It is a very important judgment... Discharge means there is not even a case for which charges can be framed. This means there is no case to answer that is worth even framing charges. We are not talking about conviction or acquittal after trial; we are talking about a situation where the court finds that there is not even a case to answer..."

IANS

29,791 views • 5 months ago

“Mr. Kejriwal, don’t question my order…” — Delhi High Court Judge issues a sharp warning ⚖️ A dramatic moment unfolded inside the courtroom as former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal found himself at the receiving end of a stern remark from single judge bench Justice Swarnakanta Sharma. During the hearing, the judge made it clear that judicial orders are not to be challenged in a manner that undermines the authority of the court, strongly objecting to Kejriwal’s claims and tone. The exchange quickly escalated, turning into a tense face-off between a senior political leader and the judiciary — something rarely witnessed so openly. The judge’s warning underscored a critical principle: respect for judicial discipline and the limits of courtroom arguments. As courtroom tempers flare, the spotlight is once again on the delicate balance between political figures and judicial institutions. Arvind Kejriwal AAP Manish Sisodia #ArvindKejriwal #DelhiHighCourt #CourtroomDrama #Judiciary #LegalNews #BreakingNews
9:24

“Mr. Kejriwal, don’t question my order…” — Delhi High Court Judge issues a sharp warning ⚖️ A dramatic moment unfolded inside the courtroom as former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal found himself at the receiving end of a stern remark from single judge bench Justice Swarnakanta Sharma. During the hearing, the judge made it clear that judicial orders are not to be challenged in a manner that undermines the authority of the court, strongly objecting to Kejriwal’s claims and tone. The exchange quickly escalated, turning into a tense face-off between a senior political leader and the judiciary — something rarely witnessed so openly. The judge’s warning underscored a critical principle: respect for judicial discipline and the limits of courtroom arguments. As courtroom tempers flare, the spotlight is once again on the delicate balance between political figures and judicial institutions. Arvind Kejriwal AAP Manish Sisodia #ArvindKejriwal #DelhiHighCourt #CourtroomDrama #Judiciary #LegalNews #BreakingNews

LawChakra

21,572 views • 4 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Attending a lecture on Rashtriya Ekta Diwas, NSA Ajit Doval says, "... I would like to share a perspective of how a security man looks at the process of governance. I believe governance has a very seminal role in the process of nation-building and in the process of securing a nation and making it achieve its goals and aspirations. It is indeed very befitting that in 2025, we should be reinventing Sardar Patel... His vision is required in India today more than ever before. Not only is India in a transition, India is also having an orbital shift from a certain type of governance and government structures, societal structures, and its place in the global order. The world is also undergoing a great transformation. Whenever the change comes, the most important thing is clarity of vision; you are not getting awed by the noise and the threats. You are not getting subdued by the adversities and the possible threats. You have to prepare yourself and you have to equip yourself... Converting the civilisation into a nation-state is a stupendous task. He knew that it could only be done through a very powerful governance mechanism. The government has got to think and do beyond what is normally expected..."
3:53

#WATCH | Delhi | Attending a lecture on Rashtriya Ekta Diwas, NSA Ajit Doval says, "... I would like to share a perspective of how a security man looks at the process of governance. I believe governance has a very seminal role in the process of nation-building and in the process of securing a nation and making it achieve its goals and aspirations. It is indeed very befitting that in 2025, we should be reinventing Sardar Patel... His vision is required in India today more than ever before. Not only is India in a transition, India is also having an orbital shift from a certain type of governance and government structures, societal structures, and its place in the global order. The world is also undergoing a great transformation. Whenever the change comes, the most important thing is clarity of vision; you are not getting awed by the noise and the threats. You are not getting subdued by the adversities and the possible threats. You have to prepare yourself and you have to equip yourself... Converting the civilisation into a nation-state is a stupendous task. He knew that it could only be done through a very powerful governance mechanism. The government has got to think and do beyond what is normally expected..."

ANI

46,627 views • 9 months ago

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.
3:34

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,408 views • 6 months ago

A blockchain project can be designed to be 100% technically decentralized, but if a single developer or a team within a single country controls the development and decision-making, the project may not be fully decentralized in terms of governance and decision-making. ## Differences between technical decentralization and governance decentralization - *Technical decentralization*: The blockchain project uses decentralized technology, such as distributed ledgers, to ensure transparency and security. - *Governance decentralization*: The blockchain project is managed and decided by a decentralized community, not by a single individual or organization. ## Conditions for a blockchain project to be considered decentralized For a blockchain project to be considered truly decentralized, it needs to meet both conditions: - *Technical decentralization*: Uses decentralized technology to ensure transparency and security. - *Decentralized governance*: Managed and decided by a decentralized community, with transparent and fair decision-making mechanisms. If a blockchain project only meets one of the above two conditions, it may not be fully decentralized. ## Building a 100% Decentralized Ecosystem: A New Model for the Future In the context of rapidly developing blockchain technology, building a 100% decentralized ecosystem is not only a goal but also an essential need. The SkyPirl (PIRL coin) project has pioneered the application of a decentralized model not only in terms of technology but also in terms of governance. This article will analyze and demonstrate the importance of this model and convince the community, developers and organizations to support this policy. ## Why 100% Decentralization is Necessary 100% decentralization ensures that no single individual or organization can control the entire system. This enhances transparency, security and fairness. When applied to an ecosystem this model will bring many benefits: - *Increased transparency*: With the decentralization of power and management by many organizations and individuals, the system will become more transparent. - *Higher security*: The use of multi-signature wallets and treasury management by many representatives will reduce security risks. - *Fairness and democracy*: The decentralized model ensures that all decisions are made fairly and democratically. ## SkyPirl's Decentralized Governance Model SkyPirl project has adopted a decentralized governance model from the beginning by: - *Decentralized development team*: Multiple development teams from different countries, ensuring that no single country or organization controls the entire project. - *Restrict developer power*: Developers are not allowed to hold websites, domains and social media channels, helping to disperse power. - *Use smart contracts and multi-signature wallets*: To ensure transparency and security in treasury management and transactions. ## Applying the Model to the Ecosystem The ecosystem will apply this 100% decentralized model to all projects. This includes: - *Decentralization of power*: Many organizations and individuals will participate in management and decision-making. - *Use multi-signature wallets*: To ensure security and transparency in treasury management. - *Representatives from organizations*: Organizations will send representatives to participate in management and decision-making. #SkyPirl #PIRL #PIRLmeet #SLOFI #CLO #2BearsExchange
0:52

A blockchain project can be designed to be 100% technically decentralized, but if a single developer or a team within a single country controls the development and decision-making, the project may not be fully decentralized in terms of governance and decision-making. ## Differences between technical decentralization and governance decentralization - *Technical decentralization*: The blockchain project uses decentralized technology, such as distributed ledgers, to ensure transparency and security. - *Governance decentralization*: The blockchain project is managed and decided by a decentralized community, not by a single individual or organization. ## Conditions for a blockchain project to be considered decentralized For a blockchain project to be considered truly decentralized, it needs to meet both conditions: - *Technical decentralization*: Uses decentralized technology to ensure transparency and security. - *Decentralized governance*: Managed and decided by a decentralized community, with transparent and fair decision-making mechanisms. If a blockchain project only meets one of the above two conditions, it may not be fully decentralized. ## Building a 100% Decentralized Ecosystem: A New Model for the Future In the context of rapidly developing blockchain technology, building a 100% decentralized ecosystem is not only a goal but also an essential need. The SkyPirl (PIRL coin) project has pioneered the application of a decentralized model not only in terms of technology but also in terms of governance. This article will analyze and demonstrate the importance of this model and convince the community, developers and organizations to support this policy. ## Why 100% Decentralization is Necessary 100% decentralization ensures that no single individual or organization can control the entire system. This enhances transparency, security and fairness. When applied to an ecosystem this model will bring many benefits: - *Increased transparency*: With the decentralization of power and management by many organizations and individuals, the system will become more transparent. - *Higher security*: The use of multi-signature wallets and treasury management by many representatives will reduce security risks. - *Fairness and democracy*: The decentralized model ensures that all decisions are made fairly and democratically. ## SkyPirl's Decentralized Governance Model SkyPirl project has adopted a decentralized governance model from the beginning by: - *Decentralized development team*: Multiple development teams from different countries, ensuring that no single country or organization controls the entire project. - *Restrict developer power*: Developers are not allowed to hold websites, domains and social media channels, helping to disperse power. - *Use smart contracts and multi-signature wallets*: To ensure transparency and security in treasury management and transactions. ## Applying the Model to the Ecosystem The ecosystem will apply this 100% decentralized model to all projects. This includes: - *Decentralization of power*: Many organizations and individuals will participate in management and decision-making. - *Use multi-signature wallets*: To ensure security and transparency in treasury management. - *Representatives from organizations*: Organizations will send representatives to participate in management and decision-making. #SkyPirl #PIRL #PIRLmeet #SLOFI #CLO #2BearsExchange

SkyPirl Official 🎈🎈

16,135 views • 1 year ago

VIDEO | On the cancellation of the NEET exam, Congress leader Sachin Pilot says, “This is not a political issue; it is an issue of governance and a matter concerning the nation. The National Testing Agency (NTA) was created to prevent paper leaks. But this paper was leaked two years ago as well. At that time, the exam was not cancelled and a CBI inquiry was ordered. What happened to that investigation? It has been two years. Now, once again, the authorities are trying to wash their hands of the matter. But who is involved in this?... The government cannot escape responsibility merely by ordering an investigation. A judicial inquiry should be conducted outside the government’s control and within a fixed time frame of one or two months. No matter how powerful the person is, no matter which party or government they belong to, whether an official or anyone else, if they are involved in this crime, they should receive strict punishment, and people should see that punishment being delivered.” #NEET #Delhi
1:51

VIDEO | On the cancellation of the NEET exam, Congress leader Sachin Pilot says, “This is not a political issue; it is an issue of governance and a matter concerning the nation. The National Testing Agency (NTA) was created to prevent paper leaks. But this paper was leaked two years ago as well. At that time, the exam was not cancelled and a CBI inquiry was ordered. What happened to that investigation? It has been two years. Now, once again, the authorities are trying to wash their hands of the matter. But who is involved in this?... The government cannot escape responsibility merely by ordering an investigation. A judicial inquiry should be conducted outside the government’s control and within a fixed time frame of one or two months. No matter how powerful the person is, no matter which party or government they belong to, whether an official or anyone else, if they are involved in this crime, they should receive strict punishment, and people should see that punishment being delivered.” #NEET #Delhi

Press Trust of India

12,323 views • 3 months ago

In #UttarPradesh's #Ghaziabad, a message reading “Road Not for Muslims” was allegedly painted on a National Highway by members of the Hindu Raksha Dal (HRD), triggering controversy. HRD president #PinkyChaudhary, in a statement, claimed that those he referred to as “jihadis” do not pay taxes and, therefore, have no right to use the National Highway. The remarks have drawn sharp reactions, and authorities have yet to issue an official statement on the matter.
0:59

In #UttarPradesh's #Ghaziabad, a message reading “Road Not for Muslims” was allegedly painted on a National Highway by members of the Hindu Raksha Dal (HRD), triggering controversy. HRD president #PinkyChaudhary, in a statement, claimed that those he referred to as “jihadis” do not pay taxes and, therefore, have no right to use the National Highway. The remarks have drawn sharp reactions, and authorities have yet to issue an official statement on the matter.

Hate Detector 🔍

21,203 views • 5 months ago

****WHY MATHIAS WALUKAGGA WILL BE ON THE BALLOT**** In Ugandan administrative and constitutional law, any decision made by a tribunal, commission, or public body outside the powers granted to it by law is ultra vires, illegal, and null and void ab initio, meaning it has no legal effect from the outset, even if unchallenged. Therefore, if the EC determines or disqualifies a candidate in a matter reserved by the Constitution and electoral laws to the High Court, that decision is treated as if it never existed. Where this occurs, the affected party may move the High Court(wc Walukagga has done), most commonly by judicial review under the Judicature Act and Civil Procedure Rules, on grounds that the Commission acted without jurisdiction, illegally, procedurally improperly, and in violation of the rules of natural justice.
5:46

****WHY MATHIAS WALUKAGGA WILL BE ON THE BALLOT**** In Ugandan administrative and constitutional law, any decision made by a tribunal, commission, or public body outside the powers granted to it by law is ultra vires, illegal, and null and void ab initio, meaning it has no legal effect from the outset, even if unchallenged. Therefore, if the EC determines or disqualifies a candidate in a matter reserved by the Constitution and electoral laws to the High Court, that decision is treated as if it never existed. Where this occurs, the affected party may move the High Court(wc Walukagga has done), most commonly by judicial review under the Judicature Act and Civil Procedure Rules, on grounds that the Commission acted without jurisdiction, illegally, procedurally improperly, and in violation of the rules of natural justice.

Wayne Frank Ntambi

35,741 views • 8 months ago

Here is the official explanation of what the different classes mean in the Taliban penal code (lower class, middle class, elite, scholars): Some people are deterred by a single warning because they have status and strong self respect, others, however are repeat offenders and require physical punishment. There are also people who are deterred merely by being summoned to court and they will not repeat the act. Those who possess self respect, once they appear before the court, they will not repeat the act again. This shows that society is diverse, and laws are applied differently, according to people’s conditions and circumstances. Another important point is that these laws were not created by us, rather they are derived in detail from Hanafi jurisprudence. Question: it is possible that among ordinary people, what you refer to as the lower class, there are individuals who listen to advice and properly observe the law, perhaps even better than those from the elite. In such a case, that person can no longer be considered part of the lower class, but rises to a higher social standing. A “lower” person is someone who is a repeated offender, someone who has been caught stealing multiple times, has repeatedly committed wrongdoing, and has not been deterred. In such a case, the judge is obliged to consider the circumstances, and the extension of corruption cause by that person in society, based on that, order imprisonment. However, if the person is of high status, understand admonition, is a community leader, and possesses social credibility, it may be sufficient to inform him that he has committed the act, and that it must not be repeated. If he does not repeat the offense, then punishment may not be imposed.
1:39

Here is the official explanation of what the different classes mean in the Taliban penal code (lower class, middle class, elite, scholars): Some people are deterred by a single warning because they have status and strong self respect, others, however are repeat offenders and require physical punishment. There are also people who are deterred merely by being summoned to court and they will not repeat the act. Those who possess self respect, once they appear before the court, they will not repeat the act again. This shows that society is diverse, and laws are applied differently, according to people’s conditions and circumstances. Another important point is that these laws were not created by us, rather they are derived in detail from Hanafi jurisprudence. Question: it is possible that among ordinary people, what you refer to as the lower class, there are individuals who listen to advice and properly observe the law, perhaps even better than those from the elite. In such a case, that person can no longer be considered part of the lower class, but rises to a higher social standing. A “lower” person is someone who is a repeated offender, someone who has been caught stealing multiple times, has repeatedly committed wrongdoing, and has not been deterred. In such a case, the judge is obliged to consider the circumstances, and the extension of corruption cause by that person in society, based on that, order imprisonment. However, if the person is of high status, understand admonition, is a community leader, and possesses social credibility, it may be sufficient to inform him that he has committed the act, and that it must not be repeated. If he does not repeat the offense, then punishment may not be imposed.

The Sure Path

11,506 views • 6 months ago

Today, the ED filed a closure report on the so called CWG scam. For years, the BJP ecosystem weaponized lies to tarnish the Congress over the issues like 2G, CWG, Mr Robert Vadra and coal. The truth stands tall, and their falsehoods lie in ruins. These cases were never about justice; they were about political persecution, headlines over substance, and deflecting attention from their own failures. The collapse of these manufactured cases is not just a legal victory, it is a moral and political indictment of the BJP's politics of false narrative. Truth does not shout from TV studios, it asserts itself quietly, powerfully, and inevitably. Will the Prime Minister apologise to the nation? Will Arvind Kejriwal apologise to the people of Delhi?
2:40

Today, the ED filed a closure report on the so called CWG scam. For years, the BJP ecosystem weaponized lies to tarnish the Congress over the issues like 2G, CWG, Mr Robert Vadra and coal. The truth stands tall, and their falsehoods lie in ruins. These cases were never about justice; they were about political persecution, headlines over substance, and deflecting attention from their own failures. The collapse of these manufactured cases is not just a legal victory, it is a moral and political indictment of the BJP's politics of false narrative. Truth does not shout from TV studios, it asserts itself quietly, powerfully, and inevitably. Will the Prime Minister apologise to the nation? Will Arvind Kejriwal apologise to the people of Delhi?

Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 ಪವನ್ ಖೇರಾ

265,589 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Supreme Court stays the order of Delhi HC, which suspended the life sentence of expelled BJP leader Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the 2017 Unnao rape case of a minor girl. Hemant Kumar Maurya, an advocate from the victims' side, says, "I would like to thank the Supreme Court today. The victim also wants to express her gratitude. The Supreme Court has issued a strong order to the lower courts stating that the accused will not be released from jail in any case, and the order granting relief has been stayed. The opposition has been given time to file a counter-affidavit, and until then, he will not be released from jail under any circumstances. This is the order of the Supreme Court, and there is a stay on the High Court's order."
0:46

#WATCH | Supreme Court stays the order of Delhi HC, which suspended the life sentence of expelled BJP leader Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the 2017 Unnao rape case of a minor girl. Hemant Kumar Maurya, an advocate from the victims' side, says, "I would like to thank the Supreme Court today. The victim also wants to express her gratitude. The Supreme Court has issued a strong order to the lower courts stating that the accused will not be released from jail in any case, and the order granting relief has been stayed. The opposition has been given time to file a counter-affidavit, and until then, he will not be released from jail under any circumstances. This is the order of the Supreme Court, and there is a stay on the High Court's order."

ANI

128,951 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | "... Asim Munir, whose statements and the Pahalgam terror attacks are directly linked to each other. He gets a special invitation for the US Army Day. What is the US up to? These are challenges. We have to sit together. We have to have a collective response, a collective will. How is that coming about? It will come only through all-party meetings. It will come only through the parliament sessions. I mean the prime ministers should stop playing politics, start doing governance, and take opposition parties, not individuals - the anchor of our system is political parties, not individuals. Take political parties and their leaders into confidence," says Congress MP Jairam Ramesh.
1:56

#WATCH | Delhi | "... Asim Munir, whose statements and the Pahalgam terror attacks are directly linked to each other. He gets a special invitation for the US Army Day. What is the US up to? These are challenges. We have to sit together. We have to have a collective response, a collective will. How is that coming about? It will come only through all-party meetings. It will come only through the parliament sessions. I mean the prime ministers should stop playing politics, start doing governance, and take opposition parties, not individuals - the anchor of our system is political parties, not individuals. Take political parties and their leaders into confidence," says Congress MP Jairam Ramesh.

ANI

127,498 views • 1 year ago