Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Two ropes. Two knots. One principle. Each side wraps twice and tucks back through itself — forming a barrel knot around the opposing rope. When you pull the ends, both barrels slide toward each other and jam. The harder the tension, the tighter the lock. There is no mechanism... show more

Amazing Things

23,633 subscribers

37,274 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING: Mathematicians invented a kind of “QR code” for knots. That might sound simple. It isn’t. Knot theory has struggled for decades with a brutal tradeoff: the best invariants are hard to compute, and the easy ones are often too weak to separate complicated knots. This new one appears to do both: powerful enough to distinguish highly complex knots, and efficient enough to handle hundreds of crossings. That could be a serious leap for topology. Could a computable knot “QR code” change how we study complexity in mathematics itself? What do you think? Follow me for more frontier physics and maths.

🚨 BREAKING: Mathematicians invented a kind of “QR code” for knots. That might sound simple. It isn’t. Knot theory has struggled for decades with a brutal tradeoff: the best invariants are hard to compute, and the easy ones are often too weak to separate complicated knots. This new one appears to do both: powerful enough to distinguish highly complex knots, and efficient enough to handle hundreds of crossings. That could be a serious leap for topology. Could a computable knot “QR code” change how we study complexity in mathematics itself? What do you think? Follow me for more frontier physics and maths.

TheNewPhysics

11,370 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🔗 Watch the full class: 🪢 Running out of rope mid-tie? It happens to everyone, and Gorgone's got a clean fix! 📚 In the full tutorial on our website, Gorgone walks you through how to connect two ropes seamlessly, where to place your knots for both safety and aesthetics, and a few one-handed rope handling tricks that are must-haves in your toolkit.

🔗 Watch the full class: 🪢 Running out of rope mid-tie? It happens to everyone, and Gorgone's got a clean fix! 📚 In the full tutorial on our website, Gorgone walks you through how to connect two ropes seamlessly, where to place your knots for both safety and aesthetics, and a few one-handed rope handling tricks that are must-haves in your toolkit.

Shibari Study

29,383 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Have you ever heard of the three-body problem? This video explains a really fascinating and complex concept in a simple way! Here's the idea: When two stars orbit each other, their motion is very orderly and predictable. But when a third star enters the picture, everything falls apart! The gravity of each star affects the other two, creating a completely chaotic and unpredictable cosmic dance. It's like three people trying to dance together with no rules, constantly bumping into each other! No one can say exactly what their next move will be.

Have you ever heard of the three-body problem? This video explains a really fascinating and complex concept in a simple way! Here's the idea: When two stars orbit each other, their motion is very orderly and predictable. But when a third star enters the picture, everything falls apart! The gravity of each star affects the other two, creating a completely chaotic and unpredictable cosmic dance. It's like three people trying to dance together with no rules, constantly bumping into each other! No one can say exactly what their next move will be.

Kekius Maximus

41,949 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Admin Post: This is a T Puller. It's really hard to pull a door closed from a wheelchair and these make it much easier. They stick on the door on the hinge side. I just flip it out and use it to pull the door until I can reach the knob. In the past I've used pull ropes but I still had to go through, turn around, wheel back in to get close enough to grab the rope and then back out. Chesnyy could also grab and pull a rope but there needed to be room for her to maneuver and at times she's not at the door with me (especially if I'm taking another dog out) or she might be carrying something. T Pullers make the house a bit easier for me. #Accessibility Video description for inclusivity: and open door that leads out to a deck. There is a small black handle on the inside. A hand reaches out and flips it out and uses it to pull the door almost closed, then grabs the door knob.

Admin Post: This is a T Puller. It's really hard to pull a door closed from a wheelchair and these make it much easier. They stick on the door on the hinge side. I just flip it out and use it to pull the door until I can reach the knob. In the past I've used pull ropes but I still had to go through, turn around, wheel back in to get close enough to grab the rope and then back out. Chesnyy could also grab and pull a rope but there needed to be room for her to maneuver and at times she's not at the door with me (especially if I'm taking another dog out) or she might be carrying something. T Pullers make the house a bit easier for me. #Accessibility Video description for inclusivity: and open door that leads out to a deck. There is a small black handle on the inside. A hand reaches out and flips it out and uses it to pull the door almost closed, then grabs the door knob.

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

12,026 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Double-Slit Experiment ✍️ It shows that tiny things like electrons act like ripples in water instead of solid marbles. When a particle is fired at two slits, it doesn't just go through one or the other; it travels as a wave of probability that passes through both at the same time. These two waves then overlap and interfere with each other, creating a pattern of light and dark stripes on a back wall. This shows that at the quantum level, reality isn't "set" until we actually measure it. It behaves as a spread-out wave of possibilities until the moment it hits a target. Video 📸 : umtiquinhodefisica

Double-Slit Experiment ✍️ It shows that tiny things like electrons act like ripples in water instead of solid marbles. When a particle is fired at two slits, it doesn't just go through one or the other; it travels as a wave of probability that passes through both at the same time. These two waves then overlap and interfere with each other, creating a pattern of light and dark stripes on a back wall. This shows that at the quantum level, reality isn't "set" until we actually measure it. It behaves as a spread-out wave of possibilities until the moment it hits a target. Video 📸 : umtiquinhodefisica

ScieVision

60,696 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

hello we have another angle for this jikook 😩 you can see how they both poke each other at the exact same time and how it's so obvious that jungkook wants to pull jimin into a hug with the way his hand is reaching all the way around jimin’s back 😩

hello we have another angle for this jikook 😩 you can see how they both poke each other at the exact same time and how it's so obvious that jungkook wants to pull jimin into a hug with the way his hand is reaching all the way around jimin’s back 😩

☺️💐 shira.

28,332 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Math says the Big Bang made matter and antimatter in equal halves. They should have erased each other into light, leaving no one to see it. And yet, you exist, because nature miscounted by one part in a billion. Math says nothing forbids a particle from outrunning light. The equations hand it an imaginary mass and let it through. And yet, in a century of looking, not one has ever shown up. Math says you can have a north without a south. Break a magnet, isolate the pole. And yet break it a trillion times, you get a trillion little magnets, each with both ends intact. The universe reads the math and decides what it’s willing to be.

Math says the Big Bang made matter and antimatter in equal halves. They should have erased each other into light, leaving no one to see it. And yet, you exist, because nature miscounted by one part in a billion. Math says nothing forbids a particle from outrunning light. The equations hand it an imaginary mass and let it through. And yet, in a century of looking, not one has ever shown up. Math says you can have a north without a south. Break a magnet, isolate the pole. And yet break it a trillion times, you get a trillion little magnets, each with both ends intact. The universe reads the math and decides what it’s willing to be.

Kekius Maximus

13,362 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In 1516, Leonardo da Vinci designed a double helix staircase for the Château de Chambord in the Loire Valley, France. This staircase is unique because it consists of two intertwined spiral staircases that allow people to ascend and descend without obstructing each other.

In 1516, Leonardo da Vinci designed a double helix staircase for the Château de Chambord in the Loire Valley, France. This staircase is unique because it consists of two intertwined spiral staircases that allow people to ascend and descend without obstructing each other.

Andy

242,864 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sometimes a connection enters your field and it's unexplainable, you just remember them. There's no forcing this remembrance. You just know. Both can sit in silence and recognize each other like you've done this a thousand lifetimes before. It's the unspoken energy that forms between two souls that gets woven into the Akashic field, and when you meet again, there's no logic that can define what this is. It's just felt. It's also not about forcing or trying to make sense of it. It's about allowing what's real to move through you effortlessly. Because when the connection is real, you don't need proof. The proof is trusting what you feel. ~ Elizabethcopolla ✨🙌🏽💫

Sometimes a connection enters your field and it's unexplainable, you just remember them. There's no forcing this remembrance. You just know. Both can sit in silence and recognize each other like you've done this a thousand lifetimes before. It's the unspoken energy that forms between two souls that gets woven into the Akashic field, and when you meet again, there's no logic that can define what this is. It's just felt. It's also not about forcing or trying to make sense of it. It's about allowing what's real to move through you effortlessly. Because when the connection is real, you don't need proof. The proof is trusting what you feel. ~ Elizabethcopolla ✨🙌🏽💫

🧬Maxpein🧬

17,851 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A drive as a first date is bad? - drive around the city you both know - listen to music together - talk to each other - just the two of you - no distractions - can pick her up and drop her off - builds TRUST - speed limit Never tried it with a 2003 Fiat, but get a decent car

A drive as a first date is bad? - drive around the city you both know - listen to music together - talk to each other - just the two of you - no distractions - can pick her up and drop her off - builds TRUST - speed limit Never tried it with a 2003 Fiat, but get a decent car

Bayne

36,566 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

there are four types of agent loops. most people only know one. loop engineering is a choice between four structures, each handing off one more job than the last. every one answers two questions: what starts a run, and what ends it. hand-run, you answer both yourself, every time. 1) turn-based → you prompt, it acts, you review, you prompt again. both jobs stay with you. use when requirements are still forming. 2) goal-based → "/goal hit Lighthouse 90, stop after 5 tries." an evaluator checks, a no sends it back. use when the outcome is measurable but the path isn't. 3) time-based → a clock fires, it runs "check the PR, fix CI," then waits. /loop local, /schedule survives a closed laptop. use for recurring work. 4) proactive → no human present. it watches a channel, spawns triage, fix, and a reviewer, closes the task itself. use for standing duties you can't predict. not which one is most advanced. whether your task is exploratory, measurable, recurring, or standing. the more you hand off, the less you babysit. full breakdown in the article below.

there are four types of agent loops. most people only know one. loop engineering is a choice between four structures, each handing off one more job than the last. every one answers two questions: what starts a run, and what ends it. hand-run, you answer both yourself, every time. 1) turn-based → you prompt, it acts, you review, you prompt again. both jobs stay with you. use when requirements are still forming. 2) goal-based → "/goal hit Lighthouse 90, stop after 5 tries." an evaluator checks, a no sends it back. use when the outcome is measurable but the path isn't. 3) time-based → a clock fires, it runs "check the PR, fix CI," then waits. /loop local, /schedule survives a closed laptop. use for recurring work. 4) proactive → no human present. it watches a channel, spawns triage, fix, and a reviewer, closes the task itself. use for standing duties you can't predict. not which one is most advanced. whether your task is exploratory, measurable, recurring, or standing. the more you hand off, the less you babysit. full breakdown in the article below.

Hanako

474,465 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

this is ACTUALLY insane. shipping one teardown is the demo. this is what the workflow is actually for. your best ad dies in two weeks. you can't run it harder without burning it out, and you can't clone your way out because andromeda clusters the copies into one entity. nineteen never spend. your winner stays a one-shot, which is rough when it's the only thing working. the brands that scale keep the structure that converts and rebuild everything on top of it. same bones, new person, new setting. distinct enough that the algo reads each as its own ad. the production loop isn't there to ship your winner once. it's there to rebuild it twenty times before it burns.

this is ACTUALLY insane. shipping one teardown is the demo. this is what the workflow is actually for. your best ad dies in two weeks. you can't run it harder without burning it out, and you can't clone your way out because andromeda clusters the copies into one entity. nineteen never spend. your winner stays a one-shot, which is rough when it's the only thing working. the brands that scale keep the structure that converts and rebuild everything on top of it. same bones, new person, new setting. distinct enough that the algo reads each as its own ad. the production loop isn't there to ship your winner once. it's there to rebuild it twenty times before it burns.

Sulfur

11,066 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is the funniest part. Trump says China treated America right. Iran says China helped it a lot. Iran even says China may receive special consideration over Hormuz transit fees. Both sides think China is on their side. Meanwhile China is standing there like the exhausted class teacher watching two students throw chairs at each other: Can you two stop fighting and finish the memorandum you already signed? That is the difference. America wants obedience. Iran wants survival. China wants the room to stop burning. Not because China is soft. Because China understands something Washington keeps forgetting: war is not strategy. war is a failure of strategy.

This is the funniest part. Trump says China treated America right. Iran says China helped it a lot. Iran even says China may receive special consideration over Hormuz transit fees. Both sides think China is on their side. Meanwhile China is standing there like the exhausted class teacher watching two students throw chairs at each other: Can you two stop fighting and finish the memorandum you already signed? That is the difference. America wants obedience. Iran wants survival. China wants the room to stop burning. Not because China is soft. Because China understands something Washington keeps forgetting: war is not strategy. war is a failure of strategy.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

32,843 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

What most struck me at the Metropolitano yesterday is Atleti to me is a rare thing, a big club but it hasn't lost itself to tourism or lost its fanbase. All around me people knew each other something I haven't seen too much in recent years visiting big clubs. I went there expecting it to be a tourist trap but it was anything, I'm not saying it's every big club either but it struck me walking around and getting the metro to the game, the on field has changed at Atleti, the stadium has but the people haven't.

What most struck me at the Metropolitano yesterday is Atleti to me is a rare thing, a big club but it hasn't lost itself to tourism or lost its fanbase. All around me people knew each other something I haven't seen too much in recent years visiting big clubs. I went there expecting it to be a tourist trap but it was anything, I'm not saying it's every big club either but it struck me walking around and getting the metro to the game, the on field has changed at Atleti, the stadium has but the people haven't.

La Liga & Beyond

41,349 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Time under tension is a red herring. If TUT mattered, planks would build massive abs. They don't. Because there's no progressive overload of mechanical tension. The plank gets longer. The abs don't. A 5-rep set takes around 15 seconds. A 15-rep set takes around 45 seconds. Both can produce the same hypertrophy if both are taken close enough to failure. The growth doesn't come from the duration. It comes from the mechanical tension in the hard reps. The ones at the end of the set where the bar is barely moving and the muscle is recruiting every available fibre to finish the rep. You can hold a light weight for 60 seconds and get nothing. You can lift a heavy weight for 15 seconds and grow. Time doesn't build muscle. Tension does. Stop counting seconds. Start counting how close you got to failure.

Time under tension is a red herring. If TUT mattered, planks would build massive abs. They don't. Because there's no progressive overload of mechanical tension. The plank gets longer. The abs don't. A 5-rep set takes around 15 seconds. A 15-rep set takes around 45 seconds. Both can produce the same hypertrophy if both are taken close enough to failure. The growth doesn't come from the duration. It comes from the mechanical tension in the hard reps. The ones at the end of the set where the bar is barely moving and the muscle is recruiting every available fibre to finish the rep. You can hold a light weight for 60 seconds and get nothing. You can lift a heavy weight for 15 seconds and grow. Time doesn't build muscle. Tension does. Stop counting seconds. Start counting how close you got to failure.

Sama Hoole

21,435 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Would you swim through the Death Tunnel in Oman? 💀🌊 This narrow underwater passage carved through solid rock is completely filled with water — open at both ends, but zero air in between. You dive in one side, hold your breath (or use proper gear), navigate the dark confined space with limited visibility, and emerge on the other side. What makes it terrifying isn’t just the physical challenge — it’s the mental pressure. The tight walls, murky water, and the knowledge that panic could be disastrous. One wrong move or moment of fear, and things can go south fast. This is real adventure in Oman — not for beginners. It demands calm, preparation, strong swimming skills, and serious respect for the environment. Would you attempt it? Or is this a hard “Hell no”?

Would you swim through the Death Tunnel in Oman? 💀🌊 This narrow underwater passage carved through solid rock is completely filled with water — open at both ends, but zero air in between. You dive in one side, hold your breath (or use proper gear), navigate the dark confined space with limited visibility, and emerge on the other side. What makes it terrifying isn’t just the physical challenge — it’s the mental pressure. The tight walls, murky water, and the knowledge that panic could be disastrous. One wrong move or moment of fear, and things can go south fast. This is real adventure in Oman — not for beginners. It demands calm, preparation, strong swimming skills, and serious respect for the environment. Would you attempt it? Or is this a hard “Hell no”?

TheRealCherokeeOwl 🦉

13,043 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Catholic Church has been consistently AGAINST divorce and separation for 2000 years. Marriage is not a wedding day, it is a death. The death of the isolated self. The death of the idea that your life belongs only to you. Before God, two people walk forward and allow themselves to be bound together, not with flowers or words, but with sacrifice. The same love that held Christ on the Cross was not soft. Iron tore through flesh and pinned Him to the wood, and He did not pull away. That is the image people do not want to see when they talk about love. Love costs blood. Love costs pride. Love costs the part of you that wants to run when things hurt. When a man and a woman become one flesh, it is not sentimental language. It is a joining that says, your suffering is now mine, your burdens are now mine, your future is now mine. You do not stand beside each other as spectators. You are fastened together and sent into battle. The world you raise children in will not be gentle. It will test you, divide you, try to convince you that commitment is a mistake and sacrifice is weakness. Marriage answers that lie with defiance. You stay. You endure. You forgive when it would be easier to walk away. You carry each other when one collapses. The vows are not promises made for the good days. They are spoken for the nights when everything feels broken and you choose each other anyway. This is why marriage is sacred. Not because it is easy, but because it mirrors something eternal. Christ did not abandon His bride when she failed Him. He stayed nailed there. So when you stand before God and bind your life to another, understand what you are stepping into. You are choosing covenant over comfort. You are choosing unity over ego. Catholic Weddings are auraful.

The Catholic Church has been consistently AGAINST divorce and separation for 2000 years. Marriage is not a wedding day, it is a death. The death of the isolated self. The death of the idea that your life belongs only to you. Before God, two people walk forward and allow themselves to be bound together, not with flowers or words, but with sacrifice. The same love that held Christ on the Cross was not soft. Iron tore through flesh and pinned Him to the wood, and He did not pull away. That is the image people do not want to see when they talk about love. Love costs blood. Love costs pride. Love costs the part of you that wants to run when things hurt. When a man and a woman become one flesh, it is not sentimental language. It is a joining that says, your suffering is now mine, your burdens are now mine, your future is now mine. You do not stand beside each other as spectators. You are fastened together and sent into battle. The world you raise children in will not be gentle. It will test you, divide you, try to convince you that commitment is a mistake and sacrifice is weakness. Marriage answers that lie with defiance. You stay. You endure. You forgive when it would be easier to walk away. You carry each other when one collapses. The vows are not promises made for the good days. They are spoken for the nights when everything feels broken and you choose each other anyway. This is why marriage is sacred. Not because it is easy, but because it mirrors something eternal. Christ did not abandon His bride when she failed Him. He stayed nailed there. So when you stand before God and bind your life to another, understand what you are stepping into. You are choosing covenant over comfort. You are choosing unity over ego. Catholic Weddings are auraful.

𝔻𝕣. 𝔾𝕣𝕠𝕪𝕡𝕖𝕣 🇻🇦🇺🇸

31,492 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

These two friends were horsing around at a friend’s home. They were playfully wrestling around when one of them picked up the other to throw them into the pool. He underestimated his throw and ended up slamming the back of the other boy onto the concrete edge of the pool, with the look on his face it was easy to see how injured he was, the other boy did check on him immediately even though the other teenagers didn’t. Given that the boy now has a serious injury, should the one that threw him in be liable for injuries or was it both their fault?

These two friends were horsing around at a friend’s home. They were playfully wrestling around when one of them picked up the other to throw them into the pool. He underestimated his throw and ended up slamming the back of the other boy onto the concrete edge of the pool, with the look on his face it was easy to see how injured he was, the other boy did check on him immediately even though the other teenagers didn’t. Given that the boy now has a serious injury, should the one that threw him in be liable for injuries or was it both their fault?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

2,306,712 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten