Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Double-Slit Experiment ✍️ It shows that tiny things like electrons act like ripples in water instead of solid marbles. When a particle is fired at two slits, it doesn't just go through one or the other; it travels as a wave of probability that passes through both at the...

scievision369's profile picture

ScieVision

25,248 subscribers

60,696 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Quantum tunneling ✍️ It is a fascinating phenomenon. Subatomic particles, like electrons, behave more like waves than solid objects. This lets them pass through barriers that seem impossible to cross. In the classical world, if you throw a ball at a wall, it always bounces back. In the quantum world, however, a particle has a small chance of just appearing on the other side of an energy "wall." This occurs because a particle's position is described by a wave of probability. This wave doesn’t drop to zero the moment it hits an obstacle. Instead, it "leaks" through, allowing some of the particle to pass to the other side. While this may sound like science fiction, this "leaking" is what allows the Sun to shine, makes modern smartphone memory possible, and lets scientists map individual atoms. Video 📸 : umtiquinhodefisica
0:13

Quantum tunneling ✍️ It is a fascinating phenomenon. Subatomic particles, like electrons, behave more like waves than solid objects. This lets them pass through barriers that seem impossible to cross. In the classical world, if you throw a ball at a wall, it always bounces back. In the quantum world, however, a particle has a small chance of just appearing on the other side of an energy "wall." This occurs because a particle's position is described by a wave of probability. This wave doesn’t drop to zero the moment it hits an obstacle. Instead, it "leaks" through, allowing some of the particle to pass to the other side. While this may sound like science fiction, this "leaking" is what allows the Sun to shine, makes modern smartphone memory possible, and lets scientists map individual atoms. Video 📸 : umtiquinhodefisica

ScieVision

115,525 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 An electron isn’t in one place. It’s not even moving the way we imagine. In the double slit experiment… it behaves like it goes through both paths at once. Until you look. Then it becomes “real.” But here’s the twist: Maybe it was never a particle traveling through space… Maybe it’s a pattern resolving in time. What you see isn’t motion it’s the final stable state. Reality doesn’t unfold. It locks in. Follow if you want to understand what you’re actually looking at.
0:10

🚨 An electron isn’t in one place. It’s not even moving the way we imagine. In the double slit experiment… it behaves like it goes through both paths at once. Until you look. Then it becomes “real.” But here’s the twist: Maybe it was never a particle traveling through space… Maybe it’s a pattern resolving in time. What you see isn’t motion it’s the final stable state. Reality doesn’t unfold. It locks in. Follow if you want to understand what you’re actually looking at.

TheNewPhysics

45,294 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Gaussian Wave Packet ✍️ It is a way to describe a quantum particle, like an electron, that is located in a certain area of space instead of being spread out everywhere. It forms a bell-shaped curve, where the peak of the curve indicates the most likely place to find the particle. This shape is special because it offers the best way to pack a particle; it meets the physical limit set by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, striking the best balance between knowing a particle's position and its momentum. However, because this packet consists of many different overlapping waves, it is naturally unstable for a free particle. Over time, these internal waves travel at slightly different speeds, which causes the bell curve to gradually flatten and widen. This process is known as dispersion. In simpler terms, the longer a quantum particle travels freely, the more unclear its exact location becomes. Video : Jeedecode
0:16

The Gaussian Wave Packet ✍️ It is a way to describe a quantum particle, like an electron, that is located in a certain area of space instead of being spread out everywhere. It forms a bell-shaped curve, where the peak of the curve indicates the most likely place to find the particle. This shape is special because it offers the best way to pack a particle; it meets the physical limit set by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, striking the best balance between knowing a particle's position and its momentum. However, because this packet consists of many different overlapping waves, it is naturally unstable for a free particle. Over time, these internal waves travel at slightly different speeds, which causes the bell curve to gradually flatten and widen. This process is known as dispersion. In simpler terms, the longer a quantum particle travels freely, the more unclear its exact location becomes. Video : Jeedecode

ScieVision

23,070 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Seeing The Quantum World In Action! Ever wondered how particles pass through impossible barriers? This video provides a clear visualization of the Quantum Tunneling Effect, a fundamental phenomenon in quantum mechanics where a particle passes through a potential barrier that it classically could not surmount. Watch as the incident wave packet interacts with the potential barrier, resulting in both reflected and transmitted components. We break down the Schrödinger equation and the formula for transmission probability. Perfect for students and physics enthusiasts looking to understand the wave-particle duality and the probabilistic nature of the subatomic world. #QuantumPhysics #Manim #Physics #QuantumMechanics #Schrodinger
0:13

Seeing The Quantum World In Action! Ever wondered how particles pass through impossible barriers? This video provides a clear visualization of the Quantum Tunneling Effect, a fundamental phenomenon in quantum mechanics where a particle passes through a potential barrier that it classically could not surmount. Watch as the incident wave packet interacts with the potential barrier, resulting in both reflected and transmitted components. We break down the Schrödinger equation and the formula for transmission probability. Perfect for students and physics enthusiasts looking to understand the wave-particle duality and the probabilistic nature of the subatomic world. #QuantumPhysics #Manim #Physics #QuantumMechanics #Schrodinger

Equationsinmotion

25,400 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A CNN investigation has revealed new details on Israel's strike on Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza: “A video clip shows that the second strike on the Nasser complex was actually two nearly simultaneous strikes, and it is believed that these second and third strikes caused most of the deaths; a weapons expert explained that the collision of two projectiles at the same moment indicates the possibility that two tanks fired at the target, while the video indicates a highly coordinated attack.”
0:17

A CNN investigation has revealed new details on Israel's strike on Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza: “A video clip shows that the second strike on the Nasser complex was actually two nearly simultaneous strikes, and it is believed that these second and third strikes caused most of the deaths; a weapons expert explained that the collision of two projectiles at the same moment indicates the possibility that two tanks fired at the target, while the video indicates a highly coordinated attack.”

The Cradle

153,344 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨SCIENCE NEWS🚨: An electron doesn’t spit out photons like a gun — it simply strums the cosmic sea like a guitar string.🧨 For decades we have been told that when an electron accelerates it “emits” a photon, as if it magically spits out a separate particle. The process is left mysterious, probabilistic, and disconnected from everyday experience. Uniphics gives a clear, mechanical picture that anyone who has ever dropped a pebble into a pond or plucked a guitar string can understand. An electron is not a little ball or a point particle. It is a gyrotron — a stable spinning structure made of three counterclockwise spin quanta bound together. When this gyrotron accelerates (changes speed or direction), its motion disturbs the surrounding ξM-field sea of unbound energy that fills all space. The disturbance creates transverse spin waves that propagate outward at the local speed of light. Think of it exactly like dropping your finger into a still pond. The ripples that spread out are not separate “water particles” you fired from your finger. They are waves in the water itself. The electron does the same thing. It does not create and launch a separate photon. Its acceleration plucks the ξM-field sea, sending coherent spin waves rippling away. These waves carry the frequency, polarization, and intensity we detect as light. The frequency depends on how rapidly the electron is accelerated, and the polarization depends on the direction of the acceleration relative to the electron’s spin orientation. The same sea that carries these waves also determines how they propagate. In regions of higher energy density the waves slow down (exactly like light slowing when it enters water or glass), which is why light bends around masses and why lenses work. Electric and magnetic fields are simply the cosmic whirlpools created by these spin waves in the sea — transverse disturbances that push and pull other gyrotrons according to their phase alignments. Maxwell’s equations emerge naturally from the mechanics of these spin waves in the ξM-field, with no separate fundamental force required. The fine-structure constant, gauge invariance, and all optical phenomena are direct consequences of how spin waves interfere and propagate through the energy sea. The universe doesn’t need mysterious photon creation rules. It just needs electrons to move through the sea, and the sea responds with ripples. Light is not something the electron “emits.” Light is what the sea sings when an electron plucks it. The same three pillars that explain gravity as a simple push into low-density voids and galactic rotations flat at 220 km/s also turn the production of light into a straightforward wave-mechanics process in flat space. How would quantum electrodynamics and our entire understanding of light change if we stopped saying electrons emit photons and started saying they simply make the cosmic sea sing? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia: Grok xAI NASA European Space Agency Brian Cox Sean Carroll Katie Mack Elon Musk #Uniphics #Electromagnetism #SpinWaves #Light #TheoryOfEverything
0:10

🚨SCIENCE NEWS🚨: An electron doesn’t spit out photons like a gun — it simply strums the cosmic sea like a guitar string.🧨 For decades we have been told that when an electron accelerates it “emits” a photon, as if it magically spits out a separate particle. The process is left mysterious, probabilistic, and disconnected from everyday experience. Uniphics gives a clear, mechanical picture that anyone who has ever dropped a pebble into a pond or plucked a guitar string can understand. An electron is not a little ball or a point particle. It is a gyrotron — a stable spinning structure made of three counterclockwise spin quanta bound together. When this gyrotron accelerates (changes speed or direction), its motion disturbs the surrounding ξM-field sea of unbound energy that fills all space. The disturbance creates transverse spin waves that propagate outward at the local speed of light. Think of it exactly like dropping your finger into a still pond. The ripples that spread out are not separate “water particles” you fired from your finger. They are waves in the water itself. The electron does the same thing. It does not create and launch a separate photon. Its acceleration plucks the ξM-field sea, sending coherent spin waves rippling away. These waves carry the frequency, polarization, and intensity we detect as light. The frequency depends on how rapidly the electron is accelerated, and the polarization depends on the direction of the acceleration relative to the electron’s spin orientation. The same sea that carries these waves also determines how they propagate. In regions of higher energy density the waves slow down (exactly like light slowing when it enters water or glass), which is why light bends around masses and why lenses work. Electric and magnetic fields are simply the cosmic whirlpools created by these spin waves in the sea — transverse disturbances that push and pull other gyrotrons according to their phase alignments. Maxwell’s equations emerge naturally from the mechanics of these spin waves in the ξM-field, with no separate fundamental force required. The fine-structure constant, gauge invariance, and all optical phenomena are direct consequences of how spin waves interfere and propagate through the energy sea. The universe doesn’t need mysterious photon creation rules. It just needs electrons to move through the sea, and the sea responds with ripples. Light is not something the electron “emits.” Light is what the sea sings when an electron plucks it. The same three pillars that explain gravity as a simple push into low-density voids and galactic rotations flat at 220 km/s also turn the production of light into a straightforward wave-mechanics process in flat space. How would quantum electrodynamics and our entire understanding of light change if we stopped saying electrons emit photons and started saying they simply make the cosmic sea sing? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia: Grok xAI NASA European Space Agency Brian Cox Sean Carroll Katie Mack Elon Musk #Uniphics #Electromagnetism #SpinWaves #Light #TheoryOfEverything

Paul Maley

67,508 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: The universe might not decide the past… until the future happens. In the delayed choice experiment, a particle behaves like a wave or a particle after it’s already passed the slits. Read that again. The outcome isn’t decided when it happens… it’s decided when it’s observed. Standard physics says: “measurement collapses the wavefunction.” But look deeper. In my framework: The system isn’t moving forward through time It exists as a complete structure across time So nothing is “changing the past”… The past was never fixed to begin with. What we call reality is just the slice we observe. So the real question is: If the future helps define the past… what does that say about time itself? Follow for deeper physics beyond spacetime.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING: The universe might not decide the past… until the future happens. In the delayed choice experiment, a particle behaves like a wave or a particle after it’s already passed the slits. Read that again. The outcome isn’t decided when it happens… it’s decided when it’s observed. Standard physics says: “measurement collapses the wavefunction.” But look deeper. In my framework: The system isn’t moving forward through time It exists as a complete structure across time So nothing is “changing the past”… The past was never fixed to begin with. What we call reality is just the slice we observe. So the real question is: If the future helps define the past… what does that say about time itself? Follow for deeper physics beyond spacetime.

TheNewPhysics

106,832 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: The double-slit experiment doesn’t just show particles acting like waves… It shows reality depends on observation. Read that again. When unobserved → reality spreads out (wave) When observed → reality “chooses” a path (particle) But here’s the deeper question: What if nothing is “collapsing”… And instead, systems are being forced into stable structure? In my framework: Reality = possible states across time Observation = constraint selecting coherence What we see = the stable path that survives So it’s not randomness becoming order… It’s structure revealing itself. The real question is: Are we observing reality… Or forcing it into existence? Follow for more on time, structure, and reality.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING: The double-slit experiment doesn’t just show particles acting like waves… It shows reality depends on observation. Read that again. When unobserved → reality spreads out (wave) When observed → reality “chooses” a path (particle) But here’s the deeper question: What if nothing is “collapsing”… And instead, systems are being forced into stable structure? In my framework: Reality = possible states across time Observation = constraint selecting coherence What we see = the stable path that survives So it’s not randomness becoming order… It’s structure revealing itself. The real question is: Are we observing reality… Or forcing it into existence? Follow for more on time, structure, and reality.

TheNewPhysics

24,961 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Is it weird that one of my favourite things about cruising is… WAVING?! They don’t promote that in the adverts! 😂👋 I can’t explain it but it fills me with lots of joy. I love it when people wave at me and I wave back, like here. 😅🌟 I’ll often spot somebody and do everything I can to get them to wave back at me. When they do I feel like I’ve won a game nobody knew we were playing. 🏆🥇 It’s pretty common for everybody to wave when a cruise ship sails away from a place. I love it even more if it’s a ship sailing past a ship, then you have hundreds and thousands of potential wavers!! 🤣👋🏼 Anybody else love it as much as me? It amuses me so much, maybe my waving friend and I don’t even speak the same language but it doesn’t matter, waving is universal. 😅👍🏼
0:10

Is it weird that one of my favourite things about cruising is… WAVING?! They don’t promote that in the adverts! 😂👋 I can’t explain it but it fills me with lots of joy. I love it when people wave at me and I wave back, like here. 😅🌟 I’ll often spot somebody and do everything I can to get them to wave back at me. When they do I feel like I’ve won a game nobody knew we were playing. 🏆🥇 It’s pretty common for everybody to wave when a cruise ship sails away from a place. I love it even more if it’s a ship sailing past a ship, then you have hundreds and thousands of potential wavers!! 🤣👋🏼 Anybody else love it as much as me? It amuses me so much, maybe my waving friend and I don’t even speak the same language but it doesn’t matter, waving is universal. 😅👍🏼

EmmaCruises ⚓️

12,816 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: Physicists just measured “negative time” in the lab. Not theory. Not math. Measured. What actually happened Scientists fired photons (particles of light) through a cloud of atoms. Normally, light should: • Enter • Interact • Exit Simple. But instead… The photons appeared to exit before they entered. It gets stranger They didn’t just infer this from timing. They measured how long the photon “lived” inside the atoms. Result: Negative dwell time. The atoms themselves confirm it. So is time broken? No but our intuition is. This comes from quantum mechanics: • Photons aren’t single points they’re spread-out waves • Only certain parts of the wave make it through • That skews the average timing But here’s the key: Two completely different measurements gave the same negative value That means: This isn’t a measurement error. It’s a real, observable quantum effect. Why this matters This challenges one of the deepest assumptions: That time always moves forward in a simple, measurable way. At the quantum level: • “Time spent” isn’t always positive • Interactions don’t behave classically • Reality is shaped by probability, not sequence The deeper idea What we call “time” might not be a flow… It might be a constraint on interactions. And under certain conditions? That constraint bends. Follow me I break down the moments where physics stops behaving normally.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING: Physicists just measured “negative time” in the lab. Not theory. Not math. Measured. What actually happened Scientists fired photons (particles of light) through a cloud of atoms. Normally, light should: • Enter • Interact • Exit Simple. But instead… The photons appeared to exit before they entered. It gets stranger They didn’t just infer this from timing. They measured how long the photon “lived” inside the atoms. Result: Negative dwell time. The atoms themselves confirm it. So is time broken? No but our intuition is. This comes from quantum mechanics: • Photons aren’t single points they’re spread-out waves • Only certain parts of the wave make it through • That skews the average timing But here’s the key: Two completely different measurements gave the same negative value That means: This isn’t a measurement error. It’s a real, observable quantum effect. Why this matters This challenges one of the deepest assumptions: That time always moves forward in a simple, measurable way. At the quantum level: • “Time spent” isn’t always positive • Interactions don’t behave classically • Reality is shaped by probability, not sequence The deeper idea What we call “time” might not be a flow… It might be a constraint on interactions. And under certain conditions? That constraint bends. Follow me I break down the moments where physics stops behaving normally.

TheNewPhysics

103,479 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Basics of Electromagnetic Waves: Electricity and magnetism can sit still, like static electricity in your hair or a magnet stuck to your fridge. But when they move and change, they actually create each other. Together, they team up to form invisible ripples of energy called electromagnetic waves. Unlike ocean waves or sound waves, which need water or air to ripple through, electromagnetic waves don't need any material at all. They can easily travel through the completely empty vacuum of space. Maxwell's Big Idea: In the 1860s and 1870s, a Scottish scientist named James Clerk Maxwell figured out how this works. He wrote down the math showing exactly how electricity and magnetism link together to make these travelling waves. Today, scientists call his famous rules Maxwell's Equations. Hertz Proves It: Later, a German physicist named Heinrich Hertz took Maxwell's ideas and brought them to life. He was the first person to actually create and catch radio waves. To honour his work, we use the word hertz to measure how fast a wave vibrates (one cycle per second). Hertz's experiments proved two massive ideas: Radio waves are just invisible light: He showed that radio waves travel at the exact same speed as light, proving that they are actually a form of light we just can't see. Going wireless: He finally figured out how to detach these energy fields from physical wires, allowing the waves to fly freely through the air exactly as Maxwell had predicted.
0:15

The Basics of Electromagnetic Waves: Electricity and magnetism can sit still, like static electricity in your hair or a magnet stuck to your fridge. But when they move and change, they actually create each other. Together, they team up to form invisible ripples of energy called electromagnetic waves. Unlike ocean waves or sound waves, which need water or air to ripple through, electromagnetic waves don't need any material at all. They can easily travel through the completely empty vacuum of space. Maxwell's Big Idea: In the 1860s and 1870s, a Scottish scientist named James Clerk Maxwell figured out how this works. He wrote down the math showing exactly how electricity and magnetism link together to make these travelling waves. Today, scientists call his famous rules Maxwell's Equations. Hertz Proves It: Later, a German physicist named Heinrich Hertz took Maxwell's ideas and brought them to life. He was the first person to actually create and catch radio waves. To honour his work, we use the word hertz to measure how fast a wave vibrates (one cycle per second). Hertz's experiments proved two massive ideas: Radio waves are just invisible light: He showed that radio waves travel at the exact same speed as light, proving that they are actually a form of light we just can't see. Going wireless: He finally figured out how to detach these energy fields from physical wires, allowing the waves to fly freely through the air exactly as Maxwell had predicted.

The Math Flow

37,313 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

tadc spoilers this part stood out to me bc it shows how Ragatha and Jax are really two sides of the same coin when it comes to feeling detached from the group. Each of them clung to Pomni as a fresh face/ fresh start and accuse the other person of making her “more like them”
0:19

tadc spoilers this part stood out to me bc it shows how Ragatha and Jax are really two sides of the same coin when it comes to feeling detached from the group. Each of them clung to Pomni as a fresh face/ fresh start and accuse the other person of making her “more like them”

frankie steins gay uncle

47,974 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: MIT researchers just built a quantum sensor that can measure multiple properties at once. That matters more than it sounds. Most solid-state quantum sensors have to measure things one by one: magnetic field, temperature, strain, frequency, phase. But reality doesn’t wait its turn. MIT used entangled qubits inside a diamond defect to measure multiple signal properties in a single shot. Read that again. This means Faster measurements Less error from repeating experiments Better sensing inside complex systems like materials and living cells The wild part? They did it at room temperature. Not in some ultra-cold, impractical lab-only setup. In a platform that could actually matter for real-world sensing. Inside a tiny defect in diamond, quantum correlations were used to pull out: amplitude frequency detuning phase all from the same measurement. That’s a big shift. Because the future of quantum tech isn’t just quantum computers. It’s quantum devices that can see more of reality at once. So the real question is When sensors stop measuring one thing at a time… how much of the hidden structure of matter becomes visible? Follow me for more physics breakthroughs that actually matter.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING: MIT researchers just built a quantum sensor that can measure multiple properties at once. That matters more than it sounds. Most solid-state quantum sensors have to measure things one by one: magnetic field, temperature, strain, frequency, phase. But reality doesn’t wait its turn. MIT used entangled qubits inside a diamond defect to measure multiple signal properties in a single shot. Read that again. This means Faster measurements Less error from repeating experiments Better sensing inside complex systems like materials and living cells The wild part? They did it at room temperature. Not in some ultra-cold, impractical lab-only setup. In a platform that could actually matter for real-world sensing. Inside a tiny defect in diamond, quantum correlations were used to pull out: amplitude frequency detuning phase all from the same measurement. That’s a big shift. Because the future of quantum tech isn’t just quantum computers. It’s quantum devices that can see more of reality at once. So the real question is When sensors stop measuring one thing at a time… how much of the hidden structure of matter becomes visible? Follow me for more physics breakthroughs that actually matter.

TheNewPhysics

23,131 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨PHYSICS NEWS🚨: Gravity Leaves Its Mark on Quantum Interference in a Tabletop Setup 🧨 According to research published in *Physical Review Letters* on June 8, 2026 by physicists at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, scientists have performed the first tabletop experiment to detect a gravitationally induced phase shift in quantum interference. Using a 50-kilometer fiber interferometer, they measured a tiny but clear effect of gravity on quantum wave interference with high precision. **Uniphics explains this result as a direct consequence of variable time flow caused by energy density gradients.** In Uniphics, gravity is not the curvature of spacetime. Instead, it arises from differences in energy density across the ξM-field. These gradients create regions where time flows at different rates — a concept described by the Maley factor (the ratio of time flow between two locations). When quantum waves (spin waves in the Uniphics framework) travel along two different paths in an interferometer, they experience slightly different time flows if one path is closer to Earth’s mass than the other. Because the phase of a quantum wave depends on how much time has passed along its path, even a tiny difference in time flow produces a measurable phase shift between the two arms of the interferometer. The University of Tennessee experiment detected exactly this kind of phase shift, confirming that gravity affects the relative timing of quantum waves in a way that can be measured in a controlled laboratory setting. This result aligns closely with Uniphics predictions. The experiment effectively measures how energy density gradients near Earth alter local time flow, which then imprints itself on the interference pattern of quantum states. It provides clean, tabletop evidence that gravity influences quantum systems through changes in time flow rather than through geometric curvature. The ability to observe this effect with such precision in a laboratory opens the door to testing gravitational effects on quantum coherence in controlled environments — something Uniphics expects to become increasingly important as we explore the deep connection between energy density, time flow, and quantum behavior. Could tabletop experiments like this eventually allow us to map energy density gradients with quantum precision and test the effects of modified time flow in different gravitational environments? **A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything.** Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia: #Uniphics #TheoryOfEverything #QuantumGravity #Interferometry #TabletopPhysics Grok xAI
0:10

🚨PHYSICS NEWS🚨: Gravity Leaves Its Mark on Quantum Interference in a Tabletop Setup 🧨 According to research published in *Physical Review Letters* on June 8, 2026 by physicists at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, scientists have performed the first tabletop experiment to detect a gravitationally induced phase shift in quantum interference. Using a 50-kilometer fiber interferometer, they measured a tiny but clear effect of gravity on quantum wave interference with high precision. **Uniphics explains this result as a direct consequence of variable time flow caused by energy density gradients.** In Uniphics, gravity is not the curvature of spacetime. Instead, it arises from differences in energy density across the ξM-field. These gradients create regions where time flows at different rates — a concept described by the Maley factor (the ratio of time flow between two locations). When quantum waves (spin waves in the Uniphics framework) travel along two different paths in an interferometer, they experience slightly different time flows if one path is closer to Earth’s mass than the other. Because the phase of a quantum wave depends on how much time has passed along its path, even a tiny difference in time flow produces a measurable phase shift between the two arms of the interferometer. The University of Tennessee experiment detected exactly this kind of phase shift, confirming that gravity affects the relative timing of quantum waves in a way that can be measured in a controlled laboratory setting. This result aligns closely with Uniphics predictions. The experiment effectively measures how energy density gradients near Earth alter local time flow, which then imprints itself on the interference pattern of quantum states. It provides clean, tabletop evidence that gravity influences quantum systems through changes in time flow rather than through geometric curvature. The ability to observe this effect with such precision in a laboratory opens the door to testing gravitational effects on quantum coherence in controlled environments — something Uniphics expects to become increasingly important as we explore the deep connection between energy density, time flow, and quantum behavior. Could tabletop experiments like this eventually allow us to map energy density gradients with quantum precision and test the effects of modified time flow in different gravitational environments? **A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything.** Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia: #Uniphics #TheoryOfEverything #QuantumGravity #Interferometry #TabletopPhysics Grok xAI

Paul Maley

17,993 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 PHYSICISTS JUST CONFIRMED “NEGATIVE TIME” IS REAL IN A MIND-BENDING QUANTUM EXPERIMENT. Light can exit a cloud of atoms before it even enters. In a new experiment, researchers fired photons through a dense cloud of ultra-cold atoms and measured something that shouldn’t be possible in classical physics. Some photons appeared to spend a negative amount of time inside the cloud effectively leaving before they had fully arrived. Why this matters: • This isn’t time travel it’s a quantum effect involving how light interacts with matter at the deepest level • It comes from “weak measurements” that let scientists observe the system without fully disturbing it • The atoms themselves “report” spending negative time in an excited state • It challenges our everyday intuition about cause and effect in quantum systems The deeper implication is enormous: We are seeing the strange, non-intuitive nature of quantum mechanics play out in real experiments. Time at the quantum scale doesn’t always behave like the arrow we experience in daily life. Effects can appear to precede causes in measurable ways without breaking relativity or causality. This is one of the clearest experimental windows yet into how reality works at its most fundamental level. What do you think does “negative time” change how you see reality, or is it just another quantum quirk we’ll eventually get used to? Follow for more frontier physics and reality-bending discoveries.
0:10

🚨 PHYSICISTS JUST CONFIRMED “NEGATIVE TIME” IS REAL IN A MIND-BENDING QUANTUM EXPERIMENT. Light can exit a cloud of atoms before it even enters. In a new experiment, researchers fired photons through a dense cloud of ultra-cold atoms and measured something that shouldn’t be possible in classical physics. Some photons appeared to spend a negative amount of time inside the cloud effectively leaving before they had fully arrived. Why this matters: • This isn’t time travel it’s a quantum effect involving how light interacts with matter at the deepest level • It comes from “weak measurements” that let scientists observe the system without fully disturbing it • The atoms themselves “report” spending negative time in an excited state • It challenges our everyday intuition about cause and effect in quantum systems The deeper implication is enormous: We are seeing the strange, non-intuitive nature of quantum mechanics play out in real experiments. Time at the quantum scale doesn’t always behave like the arrow we experience in daily life. Effects can appear to precede causes in measurable ways without breaking relativity or causality. This is one of the clearest experimental windows yet into how reality works at its most fundamental level. What do you think does “negative time” change how you see reality, or is it just another quantum quirk we’ll eventually get used to? Follow for more frontier physics and reality-bending discoveries.

TheNewPhysics

22,256 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Shohei Ohtani is dealing with a noticeable bloody blister on the middle finger of his pitching hand. He's continuing to pitch through it and has said it isn't impacting him. At the same time, his last two starts have been his two worst of the season.
0:12

Shohei Ohtani is dealing with a noticeable bloody blister on the middle finger of his pitching hand. He's continuing to pitch through it and has said it isn't impacting him. At the same time, his last two starts have been his two worst of the season.

Noah Camras

35,546 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING: Scientists just made topology visible in a spinning fluid. Not in a quantum computer. Not in a particle collider. In water. By sending standing waves through a vortex, researchers watched quantized nodal lines appear across the whole system lines where the wave amplitude drops to zero. Why that matters: → It’s a fluid analogue of the Aharonov–Bohm effect → The response is non-local → Topology didn’t stay near the core… it shaped the entire wave field That’s the deeper point: Physics isn’t always hidden in particles. Sometimes it shows up as structure in motion. If wave topology can be seen this clearly in fluids, what else in quantum physics might be hiding in plain sight? Follow me for the next wave of physics breakthroughs.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING: Scientists just made topology visible in a spinning fluid. Not in a quantum computer. Not in a particle collider. In water. By sending standing waves through a vortex, researchers watched quantized nodal lines appear across the whole system lines where the wave amplitude drops to zero. Why that matters: → It’s a fluid analogue of the Aharonov–Bohm effect → The response is non-local → Topology didn’t stay near the core… it shaped the entire wave field That’s the deeper point: Physics isn’t always hidden in particles. Sometimes it shows up as structure in motion. If wave topology can be seen this clearly in fluids, what else in quantum physics might be hiding in plain sight? Follow me for the next wave of physics breakthroughs.

TheNewPhysics

24,005 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

We took a 30B model and split it in two to write tokens in parallel instead of one at a time. Introducing Nemotron-Labs-TwoTower: a diffusion language model from NVIDIA Research adapted from Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B. Here’s how it works: one half holds the context, the other writes the tokens, with both reusing the pretrained model instead of training a new one from scratch. We found it kept 98.7% of the original model’s quality at 2.42× faster generation.
0:13

We took a 30B model and split it in two to write tokens in parallel instead of one at a time. Introducing Nemotron-Labs-TwoTower: a diffusion language model from NVIDIA Research adapted from Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B. Here’s how it works: one half holds the context, the other writes the tokens, with both reusing the pretrained model instead of training a new one from scratch. We found it kept 98.7% of the original model’s quality at 2.42× faster generation.

NVIDIA AI

759,036 просмотров • 27 дней назад

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗
0:12

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗

𝓜𝒂𝒖𝒓𝒊𝔃𝒊𝒐 𝗜𝒃𝛼

17,612 просмотров • 6 дней назад

🚨 PHYSICISTS JUST SPLIT A SINGLE PHOTON AND IT TURNED INTO AN IMPROBABLE SWARM OF PARTICLES. In a striking experiment, researchers have shown that a photon can be split apart in such a way that it produces a large number of particles, creating what they describe as a “mixture from zero to infinity.” Instead of the usual clean splitting into two photons (as seen in spontaneous parametric down-conversion), this process generated a complex, broad swarm of particles. The result challenges conventional intuition about how photons behave when pushed into extreme nonlinear regimes. Why this matters: • It demonstrates a rare and complex form of photon splitting that was previously very difficult to observe cleanly • Such processes could help simulate high-energy particle physics in table-top experiments • It opens new possibilities for generating exotic quantum states of light • It provides deeper insight into nonlinear quantum electrodynamics (QED) in strong fields The deeper implication: Photons are usually thought of as indivisible quanta of light. But under the right extreme conditions, a single photon can effectively “break apart” into many particles. This isn’t just a curiosity it touches on fundamental questions about the nature of light and matter, and could eventually lead to new tools for quantum technologies and for studying physics that normally requires particle accelerators. We’re seeing light behave in ways that blur the line between a single quantum and a many-particle system. How do you think being able to controllably split photons into swarms of particles could impact quantum optics or fundamental physics research? Follow for more frontier quantum physics and breakthroughs in light-matter interaction.
0:10

🚨 PHYSICISTS JUST SPLIT A SINGLE PHOTON AND IT TURNED INTO AN IMPROBABLE SWARM OF PARTICLES. In a striking experiment, researchers have shown that a photon can be split apart in such a way that it produces a large number of particles, creating what they describe as a “mixture from zero to infinity.” Instead of the usual clean splitting into two photons (as seen in spontaneous parametric down-conversion), this process generated a complex, broad swarm of particles. The result challenges conventional intuition about how photons behave when pushed into extreme nonlinear regimes. Why this matters: • It demonstrates a rare and complex form of photon splitting that was previously very difficult to observe cleanly • Such processes could help simulate high-energy particle physics in table-top experiments • It opens new possibilities for generating exotic quantum states of light • It provides deeper insight into nonlinear quantum electrodynamics (QED) in strong fields The deeper implication: Photons are usually thought of as indivisible quanta of light. But under the right extreme conditions, a single photon can effectively “break apart” into many particles. This isn’t just a curiosity it touches on fundamental questions about the nature of light and matter, and could eventually lead to new tools for quantum technologies and for studying physics that normally requires particle accelerators. We’re seeing light behave in ways that blur the line between a single quantum and a many-particle system. How do you think being able to controllably split photons into swarms of particles could impact quantum optics or fundamental physics research? Follow for more frontier quantum physics and breakthroughs in light-matter interaction.

TheNewPhysics

25,874 просмотров • 1 месяц назад