Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Two very different projects. Same kind of engineering instinct. The upper clip uses a cockroach with a very minimal mechanical setup. The lower one takes a quadcopter and surrounds it with tracked frames so the same machine can move on land, travel through water and take off into the... air. What caught my eye is how both designs start from a physical behavior instead of adding layers of software. For the air land water drone the engineering tradeoff is especially interesting. Flying helps with obstacles and speed. Driving can save battery when the terrain allows it. Water mobility gives the same platform another route when roads disappear. Of course, every extra mobility mode adds weight, moving parts and harder control transitions. Still I like this direction. Build the machine around the environment it has to cross. I’m still wondering what the cockroach project in the top clip is actually meant to do though. Does anyone know the intended use case?show more

Techniahqrobot | humanoid robots

18,073 subscribers

60,209 views • 9 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Abhimanyu Roy9 days ago

Is that first one anal probing cockroach?

Techniahqrobot | humanoid robots9 days ago

That first project definitely needs some context 😅 I’m still trying to find the original paper or intended use case, because the setup looks very unusual

Techniahqrobot | humanoid robots8 days ago

Too late. It already knows where you live.

RAZA | AI EXPLORER9 days ago

Really interesting engineering approach. Designing around the environment instead of adding software layers is a compelling idea.

Techniahqrobot | humanoid robots9 days ago

I like seeing hardware geometry do part of the work before control software even enters the picture. It often leads to simpler behavior with fewer assumptions.

RAZA | AI EXPLORER8 days ago

Exactly. Good geometry can simplify the control problem from the start.

BonBonaz8 days ago

cockroach with a mech suit, still less scary than my liquidation price

Techniahqrobot | humanoid robots8 days ago

Give the cockroach leverage and then we have a real problem.

Prime Ashref8 days ago

@grok wtf is going on in the first clip

Luis8 days ago

But why is it fucking the cockroach like that

Related Videos

Before an autonomous machine can act, it has to understand. A construction site is one of the most unpredictable environments imaginable. The terrain changes with every pass. Material piles shift. Other machines move nearby. No two digs are the same. For a human operator, reading that environment is second nature, built from years of experience and constant sensory feedback. Teaching a machine to do the same is one of the hardest problems in autonomy. Scene understanding is how we're working to solve it. Our system fuses LiDAR point clouds, camera feeds, and real-time terrain data into a continuous, three-dimensional picture of everything happening around the machine. It's a living model of the environment, updated moment to moment so the machine can make decisions grounded in what's actually in front of it.

Before an autonomous machine can act, it has to understand. A construction site is one of the most unpredictable environments imaginable. The terrain changes with every pass. Material piles shift. Other machines move nearby. No two digs are the same. For a human operator, reading that environment is second nature, built from years of experience and constant sensory feedback. Teaching a machine to do the same is one of the hardest problems in autonomy. Scene understanding is how we're working to solve it. Our system fuses LiDAR point clouds, camera feeds, and real-time terrain data into a continuous, three-dimensional picture of everything happening around the machine. It's a living model of the environment, updated moment to moment so the machine can make decisions grounded in what's actually in front of it.

Bedrock Robotics

33,148 views • 4 months ago

When people say data centers use millions of gallons of water, they're describing an old technology. Before, water went into evaporative cooling towers. Warm water pulled heat off the AI chips, then evaporated into the air to shed it. It was effective, but it burned through fresh water continuously, which is where the headline numbers come from today around "data centers use a massive amount of water." The data centers we revealed at Build today don't work that way. The cooling loop is closed. Water is added once during construction and recirculates indefinitely between the servers and the chillers. No evaporation, no fresh-water resupply! Satya put the scale in plain terms: a full year of water use is roughly what a single restaurant uses. Keep in mind that for us, every liter and every watt is an optimization target. The economics and the environment push in the same direction!

When people say data centers use millions of gallons of water, they're describing an old technology. Before, water went into evaporative cooling towers. Warm water pulled heat off the AI chips, then evaporated into the air to shed it. It was effective, but it burned through fresh water continuously, which is where the headline numbers come from today around "data centers use a massive amount of water." The data centers we revealed at Build today don't work that way. The cooling loop is closed. Water is added once during construction and recirculates indefinitely between the servers and the chillers. No evaporation, no fresh-water resupply! Satya put the scale in plain terms: a full year of water use is roughly what a single restaurant uses. Keep in mind that for us, every liter and every watt is an optimization target. The economics and the environment push in the same direction!

Nicolas Bustamante

140,548 views • 3 months ago

City of Harare admits air can trigger water meter charges The City of Harare and Helcraw Water say prepaid water meters work the same way as ordinary water meters. They say the meters are not faulty. According to the statement, when there is air trapped in water pipes after events like burst pipes, repairs, or when the water supply is restored, that air can pass through water meters and cause them to record water use even though mostly air is flowing. The city says this is a known challenge that affects both prepaid and conventional water meters, and that current technology cannot always tell the difference between water and large amounts of pressurised air. Residents are advised to close their taps immediately if only air is coming out and report the problem to the City of Harare or Helcraw Water so technicians can fix it. The city also says it is installing air release and pressure relief valves across the water network to reduce trapped air, improve the water system, and minimise incorrect meter readings caused by air. It says it remains committed to providing a reliable and transparent water supply.

City of Harare admits air can trigger water meter charges The City of Harare and Helcraw Water say prepaid water meters work the same way as ordinary water meters. They say the meters are not faulty. According to the statement, when there is air trapped in water pipes after events like burst pipes, repairs, or when the water supply is restored, that air can pass through water meters and cause them to record water use even though mostly air is flowing. The city says this is a known challenge that affects both prepaid and conventional water meters, and that current technology cannot always tell the difference between water and large amounts of pressurised air. Residents are advised to close their taps immediately if only air is coming out and report the problem to the City of Harare or Helcraw Water so technicians can fix it. The city also says it is installing air release and pressure relief valves across the water network to reduce trapped air, improve the water system, and minimise incorrect meter readings caused by air. It says it remains committed to providing a reliable and transparent water supply.

𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐙𝐖

28,003 views • 1 month ago

What is Bharat? Bharat is not just a piece of land. It is home to different people, with different lives, traditions, and histories. Yet some of us still divide ourselves in the name of Jati, ethnicity, and culture. We forget that we all come from the same civilization Bhartiya culture. We worship the same gods, celebrate the same festivals, and share the same heritage. So how are we so different?

What is Bharat? Bharat is not just a piece of land. It is home to different people, with different lives, traditions, and histories. Yet some of us still divide ourselves in the name of Jati, ethnicity, and culture. We forget that we all come from the same civilization Bhartiya culture. We worship the same gods, celebrate the same festivals, and share the same heritage. So how are we so different?

Comman Man

16,165 views • 27 days ago

🚨 BTC IS APPROACHING A CRITICAL LIQUIDITY ZONE Price is still trapped inside the same range The interesting part is what sits above it A move through the range high would take the obvious liquidity and retest the monthly imbalance at the same time That’s the kind of move that can look bullish while actually completing the setup If price gets rejected there, I’d expect the market to rotate back through the range And once the previous lower low gives way, there’s very little structural support left before the range low Get ready!

🚨 BTC IS APPROACHING A CRITICAL LIQUIDITY ZONE Price is still trapped inside the same range The interesting part is what sits above it A move through the range high would take the obvious liquidity and retest the monthly imbalance at the same time That’s the kind of move that can look bullish while actually completing the setup If price gets rejected there, I’d expect the market to rotate back through the range And once the previous lower low gives way, there’s very little structural support left before the range low Get ready!

NoName

24,639 views • 1 month ago

AI in CAD just went from “make me a part” to “build me the damn machine.” Using Autodesk Fusion MCP, the agent is working inside a real mechanical assembly with a chassis, shafts, gears, bearings, brackets, repeated hardware, and multiple components that all have to stay aligned with each other. That is a completely different problem from generating one clean 3D object. You can inspect the assembly from different angles, isolate sections, dig into individual joints, and keep working on the same engineering project instead of starting from another prompt-generated blob. The important part is not that AI can create geometry anymore. It is that it can operate inside the structure of a real CAD project where every component depends on what is around it. Once this gets reliable, a lot of mechanical CAD starts looking suspiciously simple: describe the system, inspect what the agent built, then tell it what to change.

AI in CAD just went from “make me a part” to “build me the damn machine.” Using Autodesk Fusion MCP, the agent is working inside a real mechanical assembly with a chassis, shafts, gears, bearings, brackets, repeated hardware, and multiple components that all have to stay aligned with each other. That is a completely different problem from generating one clean 3D object. You can inspect the assembly from different angles, isolate sections, dig into individual joints, and keep working on the same engineering project instead of starting from another prompt-generated blob. The important part is not that AI can create geometry anymore. It is that it can operate inside the structure of a real CAD project where every component depends on what is around it. Once this gets reliable, a lot of mechanical CAD starts looking suspiciously simple: describe the system, inspect what the agent built, then tell it what to change.

Rina

14,154 views • 1 month ago

I was just messing around with the animation, then I noticed that the swimming animation would leave the ripple effect behind, and you can change the size of it, too And of course, you can do this even on a land surface (Imagine a scene with you standing on land, but have a water ripple effect, something like that) Also, in this video, I just learn how to use the sky environment It's really helped me a lot to find the perfect cloud and sky color And I'm really proud of what the final picture has turned into #GPOSER #GPOSERS

I was just messing around with the animation, then I noticed that the swimming animation would leave the ripple effect behind, and you can change the size of it, too And of course, you can do this even on a land surface (Imagine a scene with you standing on land, but have a water ripple effect, something like that) Also, in this video, I just learn how to use the sky environment It's really helped me a lot to find the perfect cloud and sky color And I'm really proud of what the final picture has turned into #GPOSER #GPOSERS

Lightny Lightningstorm

12,525 views • 7 months ago

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!

Lusion™

87,350 views • 6 months ago

The Weaponisation of Identity. It is remarkable how individuals from different nations can arrive into Western countries and claim to be one of the same with the people from there. This is a touchy subject in public discourse still.

The Weaponisation of Identity. It is remarkable how individuals from different nations can arrive into Western countries and claim to be one of the same with the people from there. This is a touchy subject in public discourse still.

Michael McCarthy

90,432 views • 1 year ago

They can argue about theology all day. They cannot argue with a tunnel cut through the rock of Jerusalem 2,700 years ago. Hezekiah did not write a slogan. He dug from the Gihon Spring to the Pool of Siloam so the city would still have water when an empire came to break it. The book recorded it. Then the stone recorded it, in ancient Hebrew, including the moment two teams of workers met in the middle inside the mountain. That is not a metaphor and it is not a later nationalist myth. It is engineering in the City of David, under the Temple Mount ridge, in the same place the same people are still told they arrived as strangers. The argument against Jewish roots in Jerusalem has to step over the water, the inscription, and the map. Most people never do. They just repeat the slogan and keep walking.

They can argue about theology all day. They cannot argue with a tunnel cut through the rock of Jerusalem 2,700 years ago. Hezekiah did not write a slogan. He dug from the Gihon Spring to the Pool of Siloam so the city would still have water when an empire came to break it. The book recorded it. Then the stone recorded it, in ancient Hebrew, including the moment two teams of workers met in the middle inside the mountain. That is not a metaphor and it is not a later nationalist myth. It is engineering in the City of David, under the Temple Mount ridge, in the same place the same people are still told they arrived as strangers. The argument against Jewish roots in Jerusalem has to step over the water, the inscription, and the map. Most people never do. They just repeat the slogan and keep walking.

Mor Edge Insight

26,315 views • 8 days ago

Physicist Brian Greene demonstrates gravity in the simplest way possible using a bottle full of water. When the bottle is held still water streams out through the holes because gravity creates pressure inside. But the instant he drops the bottle the leaking stops completely. Bottle and water fall together at the same rate so the water becomes weightless relative to the bottle. It is a perfect demonstration of Einstein’s idea that gravity and acceleration are deeply connected. What feels like weight is often just the result of the frame you are in.

Physicist Brian Greene demonstrates gravity in the simplest way possible using a bottle full of water. When the bottle is held still water streams out through the holes because gravity creates pressure inside. But the instant he drops the bottle the leaking stops completely. Bottle and water fall together at the same rate so the water becomes weightless relative to the bottle. It is a perfect demonstration of Einstein’s idea that gravity and acceleration are deeply connected. What feels like weight is often just the result of the frame you are in.

Cosmos Archive

13,415 views • 4 months ago

context engineering vs graph engineering. every few months the list gets a new word and everyone treats it as a replacement for the last one. these two are not on the same list. one decides what the model sees this turn, the other decides what exists at all. the cleanest way to tell them apart is to ask what a single unit of work looks like. > context engineering is the window the window opens empty, every single time. you assemble what goes in it. the prompt, the docs, the history, the tool results. the assembling is the work. the window only grows. it never shrinks on its own, so eventually something gets dropped. usually from the middle. usually without telling you. then the turn ends and the window is thrown away. not archived, thrown away. the next turn opens empty again and you re-explain what you already explained. good context engineering is knowing what to leave out, not what to pack in. the unit of work is one window. > graph engineering is the structure the same material arrives from the same sources. instead of packing it into a window, you pull entities out of it, resolve the duplicates into one node, and write typed edges between them. nothing here is stored as text you hope to find again. it is stored as a thing with a name and its connections to other things. when the turn ends, the graph is still there. the next turn does not start from zero. it starts by querying what already exists, and the query walks edges instead of guessing at similarity. good graph engineering is deciding what counts as the same thing twice. the unit of work is one relationship. > they are not alternatives the graph is what refills the window. context engineering decides what fits. graph engineering decides what there is to choose from. remove the graph and every session starts blind. remove the context work and the best structure in the world arrives as an unreadable dump. that also tells you which one broke. the answer drifted from what you actually said, or forgot something from this same session. that is the window. the answer is coherent but invents a connection that does not exist, or cannot join two facts it has clearly seen. that is the structure. people debug the prompt because the prompt is the easiest thing to edit. it keeps taking the blame for failures that live a layer down. save this - then read the full breakdown below

context engineering vs graph engineering. every few months the list gets a new word and everyone treats it as a replacement for the last one. these two are not on the same list. one decides what the model sees this turn, the other decides what exists at all. the cleanest way to tell them apart is to ask what a single unit of work looks like. > context engineering is the window the window opens empty, every single time. you assemble what goes in it. the prompt, the docs, the history, the tool results. the assembling is the work. the window only grows. it never shrinks on its own, so eventually something gets dropped. usually from the middle. usually without telling you. then the turn ends and the window is thrown away. not archived, thrown away. the next turn opens empty again and you re-explain what you already explained. good context engineering is knowing what to leave out, not what to pack in. the unit of work is one window. > graph engineering is the structure the same material arrives from the same sources. instead of packing it into a window, you pull entities out of it, resolve the duplicates into one node, and write typed edges between them. nothing here is stored as text you hope to find again. it is stored as a thing with a name and its connections to other things. when the turn ends, the graph is still there. the next turn does not start from zero. it starts by querying what already exists, and the query walks edges instead of guessing at similarity. good graph engineering is deciding what counts as the same thing twice. the unit of work is one relationship. > they are not alternatives the graph is what refills the window. context engineering decides what fits. graph engineering decides what there is to choose from. remove the graph and every session starts blind. remove the context work and the best structure in the world arrives as an unreadable dump. that also tells you which one broke. the answer drifted from what you actually said, or forgot something from this same session. that is the window. the answer is coherent but invents a connection that does not exist, or cannot join two facts it has clearly seen. that is the structure. people debug the prompt because the prompt is the easiest thing to edit. it keeps taking the blame for failures that live a layer down. save this - then read the full breakdown below

Hanako

19,160 views • 2 months ago

The Astra videos are fun. But I am trying a much cheaper setup with my laptop, around 11GB of open models and a $1.6k Unitree Go2 Air After one walk I can search what the dog saw and where it saw it. Next I want it to recognize those places when we go back and use that memory This is the Air, not the EDU model with official support for secondary development. It was not really built for this, which makes it more fun I drove it around my apartment (sorry for the mess) and (Dimensional) recorded frames along with LiDAR, odometry and transforms. Having the images and the robot's position in one recording gave me something to build on On the right of the video, the dog is map filling in with what it saw where. The left one shows what it detects Three very small and open models ran later on my laptop: SigLIP around 200M parameters, made the frames searchable. Qwen3-VL-8B in 4-bit through ollama described the selected views and checked search result Moondream2, from moondream supplied the object boxes All zero shot. We can upload the recordings and saved maps to the Dimensional cloud and download them later. The goal is for the Go2 to know where he is and where is what Next step is running this minimal stack on a 16 GB NVIDIA Embedded Jetson mounted on the Go2 Air

The Astra videos are fun. But I am trying a much cheaper setup with my laptop, around 11GB of open models and a $1.6k Unitree Go2 Air After one walk I can search what the dog saw and where it saw it. Next I want it to recognize those places when we go back and use that memory This is the Air, not the EDU model with official support for secondary development. It was not really built for this, which makes it more fun I drove it around my apartment (sorry for the mess) and (Dimensional) recorded frames along with LiDAR, odometry and transforms. Having the images and the robot's position in one recording gave me something to build on On the right of the video, the dog is map filling in with what it saw where. The left one shows what it detects Three very small and open models ran later on my laptop: SigLIP around 200M parameters, made the frames searchable. Qwen3-VL-8B in 4-bit through ollama described the selected views and checked search result Moondream2, from moondream supplied the object boxes All zero shot. We can upload the recordings and saved maps to the Dimensional cloud and download them later. The goal is for the Go2 to know where he is and where is what Next step is running this minimal stack on a 16 GB NVIDIA Embedded Jetson mounted on the Go2 Air

Omar Espejel

77,940 views • 18 days ago

US-based Ryse Aero Technologies has developed the Recon, a single-seat electric multicopter that does not require a pilot’s license to fly. It can take off and land on both land and water, reaching speeds of up to 63 mph with a range of 25 miles. The aircraft uses AI-assisted controls and joystick operation, making it easy to fly with minimal training.

US-based Ryse Aero Technologies has developed the Recon, a single-seat electric multicopter that does not require a pilot’s license to fly. It can take off and land on both land and water, reaching speeds of up to 63 mph with a range of 25 miles. The aircraft uses AI-assisted controls and joystick operation, making it easy to fly with minimal training.

Space and Technology

76,562 views • 3 months ago

I’m the only developer of data centers on earth that graduated from environmental studies. I'm pretty aware of what these concerns are. They are around air, water use, heat, noise pollution. So sustainability is at the heart of what we do in terms of all these proposals. We search for the best technology. There's many air-cooled turbines now, so you're blending in air-cooled versus water. There's so many different ways to generate power. We can also put a percentage of the power generation through solar, wind, and batteries because the battery technology is 10X more efficient than it was just five years ago. So that's very helpful because it makes the cost of energy lower.

I’m the only developer of data centers on earth that graduated from environmental studies. I'm pretty aware of what these concerns are. They are around air, water use, heat, noise pollution. So sustainability is at the heart of what we do in terms of all these proposals. We search for the best technology. There's many air-cooled turbines now, so you're blending in air-cooled versus water. There's so many different ways to generate power. We can also put a percentage of the power generation through solar, wind, and batteries because the battery technology is 10X more efficient than it was just five years ago. So that's very helpful because it makes the cost of energy lower.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

1,388,506 views • 4 months ago

I'd like to take a second to discuss what it means for a storm to be a Category 5. It's a beautiful, mesmerizing, terrifying and awe-inspiring pageant of power and elegance. It's the atmosphere at its most dynamic, raw and extreme. The hurricane has to have an absolutely perfect, undisturbed balance. It's an extremely rare feat. A Category 5 is like a spinning top whirring on a table; even the slightest jiggle can knock it off-kilter – like bumping the table. There must be virtually no shear, or changing winds with height. The upper-level winds around the system must be relatively calm. It's incredible to think that the planet's most furious storms are born out of an abundance of calm. The waters must be exceptionally warm – upwards of 86 degrees – to be replete with "oceanic heat content," or heat energy for the hurricane to draw upon. The warm waters heat and moisten the air above. That air rushes into the building hurricane. As air nears the center of the storm, it expands due to the hurricane's low pressure. That expansion releases heat energy to the environment, encouraging air to rise and powering the storm. In theory, that air parcel (pocket) should cool, but it doesn't. Why? It's still being heated by the oceans below. The ocean is constantly re-heating the lower atmosphere – and energizing the storm – at the exact same rate the air is releasing heat energy into the storm. Most of the moisture in the air condenses and produces rain, releasing even more "latent heat" to the environment. Near the hurricane's center, there's a lot of heat energy. So much so that the air rises, as if in a chimney. That rising air literally lifts air up and away from the surface. There's literally less air, and therefore less air weight, or *pressure*, at the center of the storm. Most Category 5 hurricanes are "missing" about 8-10 percent of the air from the middle. It's that deficit of air that behaves like a vacuum of sorts. Air from outside the storm rushes in to fill the void, like water spiraling into a sink drain. The greater the deficit, the faster the winds. The wind increases exponentially closer to the center of the storm; Category 5 hurricanes have winds over 157 mph. So why doesn't the eye, with the "missing" air, just "fill in?" Because the hurricane is rotating so furiously! The air is flung outwards by the "centrifugal force" at the exact same rate it's being pulled inwards by the "pressure gradient force." The air can never fully reach the eye – and instead it swirls around and around, like water perpetually sloshing around the edges of a toilet. We call that "cyclostrophic balance." Thus, the eye doesn't fill in. The storm charges on. And – until the system is torn apart by disruptive upper-level winds or moves over cooler waters/land – it continues.

I'd like to take a second to discuss what it means for a storm to be a Category 5. It's a beautiful, mesmerizing, terrifying and awe-inspiring pageant of power and elegance. It's the atmosphere at its most dynamic, raw and extreme. The hurricane has to have an absolutely perfect, undisturbed balance. It's an extremely rare feat. A Category 5 is like a spinning top whirring on a table; even the slightest jiggle can knock it off-kilter – like bumping the table. There must be virtually no shear, or changing winds with height. The upper-level winds around the system must be relatively calm. It's incredible to think that the planet's most furious storms are born out of an abundance of calm. The waters must be exceptionally warm – upwards of 86 degrees – to be replete with "oceanic heat content," or heat energy for the hurricane to draw upon. The warm waters heat and moisten the air above. That air rushes into the building hurricane. As air nears the center of the storm, it expands due to the hurricane's low pressure. That expansion releases heat energy to the environment, encouraging air to rise and powering the storm. In theory, that air parcel (pocket) should cool, but it doesn't. Why? It's still being heated by the oceans below. The ocean is constantly re-heating the lower atmosphere – and energizing the storm – at the exact same rate the air is releasing heat energy into the storm. Most of the moisture in the air condenses and produces rain, releasing even more "latent heat" to the environment. Near the hurricane's center, there's a lot of heat energy. So much so that the air rises, as if in a chimney. That rising air literally lifts air up and away from the surface. There's literally less air, and therefore less air weight, or pressure, at the center of the storm. Most Category 5 hurricanes are "missing" about 8-10 percent of the air from the middle. It's that deficit of air that behaves like a vacuum of sorts. Air from outside the storm rushes in to fill the void, like water spiraling into a sink drain. The greater the deficit, the faster the winds. The wind increases exponentially closer to the center of the storm; Category 5 hurricanes have winds over 157 mph. So why doesn't the eye, with the "missing" air, just "fill in?" Because the hurricane is rotating so furiously! The air is flung outwards by the "centrifugal force" at the exact same rate it's being pulled inwards by the "pressure gradient force." The air can never fully reach the eye – and instead it swirls around and around, like water perpetually sloshing around the edges of a toilet. We call that "cyclostrophic balance." Thus, the eye doesn't fill in. The storm charges on. And – until the system is torn apart by disruptive upper-level winds or moves over cooler waters/land – it continues.

Matthew Cappucci

24,772 views • 1 year ago

What Lusi and William think of each other. Lusi: He is very easy to get along with and he’s really a very nice person. CWT: Lusi gave me the impression during fairy tale variety, at the time I felt a bit like we are the same kind of person, and in fact when I knew that I will filmed together with Lusi, I was actually like you, I wish to work and collaborate with her. Because I think it is important for me to be with the same kind of people. I felt a fresh feeling of her and I just want to know what kind of girl she is actually, so when we start filming, it turned out, we were the same kind and type of person .. hahaha Me : both share the same brain cells 🤣😭.. missing them 🥺 #LovesAmbition #许我耀眼 #ZhaoLusi #จ้าวลู่ซือ #赵露思 #WilliamChan #เฉินเหว่ #陈伟霆

What Lusi and William think of each other. Lusi: He is very easy to get along with and he’s really a very nice person. CWT: Lusi gave me the impression during fairy tale variety, at the time I felt a bit like we are the same kind of person, and in fact when I knew that I will filmed together with Lusi, I was actually like you, I wish to work and collaborate with her. Because I think it is important for me to be with the same kind of people. I felt a fresh feeling of her and I just want to know what kind of girl she is actually, so when we start filming, it turned out, we were the same kind and type of person .. hahaha Me : both share the same brain cells 🤣😭.. missing them 🥺 #LovesAmbition #许我耀眼 #ZhaoLusi #จ้าวลู่ซือ #赵露思 #WilliamChan #เฉินเหว่ #陈伟霆

Love’s Ambition

36,668 views • 11 months ago

WHAT IS AN AI "SOFTWARE FACTORY" AND IS IT HYPE (31 MINUTE BREAKDOWN) I think it's a silly name for a genuinely USEFUL idea! A software factory is 5-6 markdown files that sit next to your code and tell your agents how you like to work, so you can build high quality apps 24/7. It's going viral because AI coding has a trust problem. The model can build the feature, but with no structure around it you end up babysitting the agent, wondering what changed and hoping it didn't break something important. So you build with agents the same way a factory builds physical products! 1. Each feature gets its own station, which in software means its own branch, so multiple agents can work at the same time without stepping on each other. 2. The build station gives the agent rules for how to write the code, because "it works" is very different from "a developer could open this repo next month and understand what happened." 3. The proof station makes the agent show evidence. Screenshots, videos, speed numbers, before-and-after states. It has to prove the thing works instead of saying it works. 4. The review station runs the work through a code review agent, and if it doesn't clear the bar, it goes back through the line. 5. Then you show up at the end to merge. For a 100+ years people have run production this way, and it worked because the structure is good. The full episode on what’s a software factory is NOW live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 with the wonderful Micky Watch: So is it hype?!? I don't think it is, because of what it does to your output! WITHOUT a factory, you build ONE feature at a time and you're the bottleneck at every step, prompting, checking the diff, testing it yourself, hoping nothing else broke (spoiler alert it often does). WITH a factory, EACH feature runs in its own isolated copy of the app, so you can have 10+ of them going at once, and each agent has to prove its own work and pass a code review before it ever reaches you. Instead of supervising the work, you're APPROVING finished work that already has evidence attached. REALLY interesting to see how work with agents is evolving to be….well, similar to working with people!

WHAT IS AN AI "SOFTWARE FACTORY" AND IS IT HYPE (31 MINUTE BREAKDOWN) I think it's a silly name for a genuinely USEFUL idea! A software factory is 5-6 markdown files that sit next to your code and tell your agents how you like to work, so you can build high quality apps 24/7. It's going viral because AI coding has a trust problem. The model can build the feature, but with no structure around it you end up babysitting the agent, wondering what changed and hoping it didn't break something important. So you build with agents the same way a factory builds physical products! 1. Each feature gets its own station, which in software means its own branch, so multiple agents can work at the same time without stepping on each other. 2. The build station gives the agent rules for how to write the code, because "it works" is very different from "a developer could open this repo next month and understand what happened." 3. The proof station makes the agent show evidence. Screenshots, videos, speed numbers, before-and-after states. It has to prove the thing works instead of saying it works. 4. The review station runs the work through a code review agent, and if it doesn't clear the bar, it goes back through the line. 5. Then you show up at the end to merge. For a 100+ years people have run production this way, and it worked because the structure is good. The full episode on what’s a software factory is NOW live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 with the wonderful Micky Watch: So is it hype?!? I don't think it is, because of what it does to your output! WITHOUT a factory, you build ONE feature at a time and you're the bottleneck at every step, prompting, checking the diff, testing it yourself, hoping nothing else broke (spoiler alert it often does). WITH a factory, EACH feature runs in its own isolated copy of the app, so you can have 10+ of them going at once, and each agent has to prove its own work and pass a code review before it ever reaches you. Instead of supervising the work, you're APPROVING finished work that already has evidence attached. REALLY interesting to see how work with agents is evolving to be….well, similar to working with people!

GREG ISENBERG

30,787 views • 13 days ago