Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Two years ago, Congress almost left the county with a huge intelligence gap for no good reason. Lives would have been lost had we not reauthorozed FISA. The violent cartel leader “El Mencho” would still be alive if we had not reauthorized FISA and passed my provision to target...

DanCrenshawTX's profile picture

Dan Crenshaw

1,273,655 subscribers

20,709 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This may come as a surprise to you (it was for me when I found out), but we can’t legally use FISA authorities to “wiretap” the Mexican drug cartel affiliates or the Chinese companies that make precursors for fentanyl. We are missing an enormous amount of information about supply chains, money laundering, trafficking, and production - all because the law isn’t updated to deal with this new fentanyl problem. So today I offered an amendment to change that. It was very simple, only one sentence. It would simply allow us to apply for warrants to wiretap these cartel organizations operating overseas. It was NOT attached to any other legislation or “poison pills” that would give anyone a reasonable excuse to vote against it. No brainer right? Luckily it passed. It will likely become law. It will help stop these thugs and save American lives. Who would be against that? Well, it turns out about 83 Republicans and 69 Democrats are against collecting intelligence on cartels or their Chinese partners. Ironically, many of these members talk a really tough talk about cartels. They talk about “fighting them.” How do you fight an enemy you can’t even collect intelligence on? But when given a simple choice, they chose NOT to take the first step necessary to actually be “tough” against murderous cartels and their buddies in China. The reasons I got? It “expanded” surveillance. No, it updates the list of FOREIGN targets in FOREIGN lands that we can apply for a warrant to target. Am I surprised? Pissed? Maybe. Definitely disappointed. I’m tired of seeing people up here say one thing and do another. It’s exhausting. They might be against the FISA program (that’s a whole other debate), but against collecting intelligence on cartels? Seriously? They had the chance to vote against the FISA bill (which they did) but still support the amendment to target cartels if they had wanted to. They were separate votes. The amendments always come first. Sorry, but you need to hear this. You need to know the truth about what goes on up here. You need to know that those 83 Republicans aligned with the far-left progressives to try and take down this amendment. I count many of them as friends and partners, even if we don’t always agree. So I was astonished by this result. But it passed. Thank God. I can go home and tell the parents of fentanyl victims that we are fighting for them, and actually taking action. But if you hear the Nay votes talking tough about the cartels, make them explain why they voted to protect El Chapo, Chinese companies making precursors, or money launderers in Mexico. Ask them why they don’t want us to spy on them *even with a warrant.* (yes! This amendment actually just allows us to APPLY for a warrant!!!) I was tempted to list their names here. I won’t. I’m not trying to get you to swarm their offices. But I’m not going to sugarcoat the truth either. You can look up vote records easily by googling “house roll call votes Bill Number: H. R. 7888" and clicking on Roll Call Votes - Clerk of the United States House of Representatives.
3:37

This may come as a surprise to you (it was for me when I found out), but we can’t legally use FISA authorities to “wiretap” the Mexican drug cartel affiliates or the Chinese companies that make precursors for fentanyl. We are missing an enormous amount of information about supply chains, money laundering, trafficking, and production - all because the law isn’t updated to deal with this new fentanyl problem. So today I offered an amendment to change that. It was very simple, only one sentence. It would simply allow us to apply for warrants to wiretap these cartel organizations operating overseas. It was NOT attached to any other legislation or “poison pills” that would give anyone a reasonable excuse to vote against it. No brainer right? Luckily it passed. It will likely become law. It will help stop these thugs and save American lives. Who would be against that? Well, it turns out about 83 Republicans and 69 Democrats are against collecting intelligence on cartels or their Chinese partners. Ironically, many of these members talk a really tough talk about cartels. They talk about “fighting them.” How do you fight an enemy you can’t even collect intelligence on? But when given a simple choice, they chose NOT to take the first step necessary to actually be “tough” against murderous cartels and their buddies in China. The reasons I got? It “expanded” surveillance. No, it updates the list of FOREIGN targets in FOREIGN lands that we can apply for a warrant to target. Am I surprised? Pissed? Maybe. Definitely disappointed. I’m tired of seeing people up here say one thing and do another. It’s exhausting. They might be against the FISA program (that’s a whole other debate), but against collecting intelligence on cartels? Seriously? They had the chance to vote against the FISA bill (which they did) but still support the amendment to target cartels if they had wanted to. They were separate votes. The amendments always come first. Sorry, but you need to hear this. You need to know the truth about what goes on up here. You need to know that those 83 Republicans aligned with the far-left progressives to try and take down this amendment. I count many of them as friends and partners, even if we don’t always agree. So I was astonished by this result. But it passed. Thank God. I can go home and tell the parents of fentanyl victims that we are fighting for them, and actually taking action. But if you hear the Nay votes talking tough about the cartels, make them explain why they voted to protect El Chapo, Chinese companies making precursors, or money launderers in Mexico. Ask them why they don’t want us to spy on them *even with a warrant.* (yes! This amendment actually just allows us to APPLY for a warrant!!!) I was tempted to list their names here. I won’t. I’m not trying to get you to swarm their offices. But I’m not going to sugarcoat the truth either. You can look up vote records easily by googling “house roll call votes Bill Number: H. R. 7888" and clicking on Roll Call Votes - Clerk of the United States House of Representatives.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw

112,165 views • 2 years ago

Rep. Roy on FISA reform: "I would just note that all four witnesses, including the Democrat witness, just said there is no legitimate basis for us not to include a warrant protection requirement in FISA reform. I want that to ring through the halls of Congress between now and April, so that when we are forced with the vote that is inevitably going to occur on this issue, that we not have what happened almost two years ago, where we left the American people without the protection the Constitution affords them from a tool that is being used by on a bipartisan basis to target the American people and collect their data, which is offensive and it is wrong,"
1:58

Rep. Roy on FISA reform: "I would just note that all four witnesses, including the Democrat witness, just said there is no legitimate basis for us not to include a warrant protection requirement in FISA reform. I want that to ring through the halls of Congress between now and April, so that when we are forced with the vote that is inevitably going to occur on this issue, that we not have what happened almost two years ago, where we left the American people without the protection the Constitution affords them from a tool that is being used by on a bipartisan basis to target the American people and collect their data, which is offensive and it is wrong,"

Rep. Chip Roy Press Office

54,266 views • 8 months ago

🚨 JUST ANNOUNCED: President Trump demands Republicans pass a clean extension of FISA in the House this week, working with Speaker Johnson "I was a victim of the worst and most illegal abuse of FISA in our Nation’s History, by Radical Left Lunatics, who lied to the FISA Court to spy on my 2016 Presidential Campaign in their attempt to RIG the Election in favor of Crooked Hillary Clinton." "The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our Military. I have spoken to many Generals about this, and they consider it VITAL. Not one said, even tacitly, that they can do without it — especially right now with our brilliant Military Operation in Iran."
0:42

🚨 JUST ANNOUNCED: President Trump demands Republicans pass a clean extension of FISA in the House this week, working with Speaker Johnson "I was a victim of the worst and most illegal abuse of FISA in our Nation’s History, by Radical Left Lunatics, who lied to the FISA Court to spy on my 2016 Presidential Campaign in their attempt to RIG the Election in favor of Crooked Hillary Clinton." "The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our Military. I have spoken to many Generals about this, and they consider it VITAL. Not one said, even tacitly, that they can do without it — especially right now with our brilliant Military Operation in Iran."

Eric Daugherty

26,981 views • 4 months ago

Bill Maher: “At the Emmys, would it have kiIIed someone to get up there — since they all want to talk about their politics… to get up there — not to give a speech about how much they like Charlie Kirk just to say we had a political ass*ssination this week and that’s wrong… They would have been booed off the stage because he’s on the wrong team.” “You’re not even allowed to say that. Can you imagine if a left-wing person was assassinated that week? The whole show would have been about that.” “Is that not true? Can’t you admit that?”
1:53

Bill Maher: “At the Emmys, would it have kiIIed someone to get up there — since they all want to talk about their politics… to get up there — not to give a speech about how much they like Charlie Kirk just to say we had a political ass*ssination this week and that’s wrong… They would have been booed off the stage because he’s on the wrong team.” “You’re not even allowed to say that. Can you imagine if a left-wing person was assassinated that week? The whole show would have been about that.” “Is that not true? Can’t you admit that?”

RedWave Press

407,690 views • 11 months ago

This may come as a surprise to you (it was for me when I found out), but we can’t legally use FISA authorities to “wiretap” the Mexican drug cartel affiliates or the Chinese companies that make precursors for fentanyl. We are missing an enormous amount of information about supply chains, money laundering, trafficking, and production - all because the law isn’t updated to deal with this new fentanyl problem. So today I offered an amendment to change that. It was very simple, only one sentence. It would simply allow us to apply for warrants to wiretap these cartel organizations operating overseas. It was NOT attached to any other legislation or “poison pills” that would give anyone a reasonable excuse to vote against it. No brainer right? Luckily it passed. It will likely become law. It will help stop these thugs and save American lives. Who would be against that? Well, it turns out about 83 Republicans and 69 Democrats are against collecting intelligence on cartels or their Chinese partners. Ironically, many of these members talk a really tough talk about cartels. They talk about “fighting them.” How do you fight an enemy you can’t even collect intelligence on? But when given a simple choice, they chose NOT to take the first step necessary to actually be “tough” against murderous cartels and their buddies in China. The reasons I got? It “expanded” surveillance. No, it updates the list of FOREIGN targets in FOREIGN lands that we can apply for a warrant to target. Am I surprised? Pissed? Maybe. Definitely disappointed. I’m tired of seeing people up here say one thing and do another. It’s exhausting. They might be against the FISA program (that’s a whole other debate), but against collecting intelligence on cartels? Seriously? They had the chance to vote against the FISA bill (which they did) but still support the amendment to target cartels if they had wanted to. They were separate votes. The amendments always come first. Sorry, but you need to hear this. You need to know the truth about what goes on up here. You need to know that those 83 Republicans aligned with the far-left progressives to try and take down this amendment. I count many of them as friends and partners, even if we don’t always agree. So I was astonished by this result. But it passed. Thank God. I can go home and tell the parents of fentanyl victims that we are fighting for them, and actually taking action. But if you hear the Nay votes talking tough about the cartels, make them explain why they voted to protect El Chapo, Chinese companies making precursors, or money launderers in Mexico. Ask them why they don’t want us to spy on them *even with a warrant.* (yes! This amendment actually just allows us to APPLY for a warrant!!!) I was tempted to list their names here. I won’t. I’m not trying to get you to swarm their offices. But I’m not going to sugarcoat the truth either. You can look up vote records easily by googling “house roll call votes Bill Number: H. R. 7888" and clicking on Roll Call Votes - Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. And f*** the cartels.
3:37

This may come as a surprise to you (it was for me when I found out), but we can’t legally use FISA authorities to “wiretap” the Mexican drug cartel affiliates or the Chinese companies that make precursors for fentanyl. We are missing an enormous amount of information about supply chains, money laundering, trafficking, and production - all because the law isn’t updated to deal with this new fentanyl problem. So today I offered an amendment to change that. It was very simple, only one sentence. It would simply allow us to apply for warrants to wiretap these cartel organizations operating overseas. It was NOT attached to any other legislation or “poison pills” that would give anyone a reasonable excuse to vote against it. No brainer right? Luckily it passed. It will likely become law. It will help stop these thugs and save American lives. Who would be against that? Well, it turns out about 83 Republicans and 69 Democrats are against collecting intelligence on cartels or their Chinese partners. Ironically, many of these members talk a really tough talk about cartels. They talk about “fighting them.” How do you fight an enemy you can’t even collect intelligence on? But when given a simple choice, they chose NOT to take the first step necessary to actually be “tough” against murderous cartels and their buddies in China. The reasons I got? It “expanded” surveillance. No, it updates the list of FOREIGN targets in FOREIGN lands that we can apply for a warrant to target. Am I surprised? Pissed? Maybe. Definitely disappointed. I’m tired of seeing people up here say one thing and do another. It’s exhausting. They might be against the FISA program (that’s a whole other debate), but against collecting intelligence on cartels? Seriously? They had the chance to vote against the FISA bill (which they did) but still support the amendment to target cartels if they had wanted to. They were separate votes. The amendments always come first. Sorry, but you need to hear this. You need to know the truth about what goes on up here. You need to know that those 83 Republicans aligned with the far-left progressives to try and take down this amendment. I count many of them as friends and partners, even if we don’t always agree. So I was astonished by this result. But it passed. Thank God. I can go home and tell the parents of fentanyl victims that we are fighting for them, and actually taking action. But if you hear the Nay votes talking tough about the cartels, make them explain why they voted to protect El Chapo, Chinese companies making precursors, or money launderers in Mexico. Ask them why they don’t want us to spy on them *even with a warrant.* (yes! This amendment actually just allows us to APPLY for a warrant!!!) I was tempted to list their names here. I won’t. I’m not trying to get you to swarm their offices. But I’m not going to sugarcoat the truth either. You can look up vote records easily by googling “house roll call votes Bill Number: H. R. 7888" and clicking on Roll Call Votes - Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. And f*** the cartels.

Dan Crenshaw

1,518,158 views • 2 years ago

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump demands a clean extension of FISA from Leader Thune and Speaker Johnson, but says the common sense reforms MUST remain "I was a victim of the worst and most illegal abuse of FISA in our Nation’s History, by Radical Left Lunatics who lied to the FISA Court to spy on my 2016 Presidential Campaign in their attempt to RIG the Election in favor of Crooked Hillary Clinton." "With the ongoing successful Military activities against the Terrorist Iranian Regime, it is more important than ever that we remain vigilant, PROTECT our Homeland, Troops, and Diplomats stationed abroad, and maintain our ability to quickly stop bad actors seeking to cause harm to our People and our Country." "The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our Military. I have spoken to many Generals about this, and they consider it vital. Not one said, even tacitly, that they can do without it — especially right now with our brilliant Military Operation in Iran."
0:42

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump demands a clean extension of FISA from Leader Thune and Speaker Johnson, but says the common sense reforms MUST remain "I was a victim of the worst and most illegal abuse of FISA in our Nation’s History, by Radical Left Lunatics who lied to the FISA Court to spy on my 2016 Presidential Campaign in their attempt to RIG the Election in favor of Crooked Hillary Clinton." "With the ongoing successful Military activities against the Terrorist Iranian Regime, it is more important than ever that we remain vigilant, PROTECT our Homeland, Troops, and Diplomats stationed abroad, and maintain our ability to quickly stop bad actors seeking to cause harm to our People and our Country." "The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our Military. I have spoken to many Generals about this, and they consider it vital. Not one said, even tacitly, that they can do without it — especially right now with our brilliant Military Operation in Iran."

Eric Daugherty

32,016 views • 5 months ago

Kash Patel on FBI Director Chris Wray’s Illegal Surveillance of Americans. "Chris Wray was caught last year illegally using 702 collection methods against Americans—274,000 times. That’s not my number; it’s in the report that the FISA court wrote." "The FISA court was supposed to oversee this process, but during Russiagate, they targeted an American citizen to get into a presidential campaign of all American citizens." "The problem is, the people given the FISA authorities in the deep state leadership levels—they’re the ones that abused it, broke the law, and corrupted it." "Congress had a chance to fix FISA this year, but instead, the majority in the House, Republicans included, bent the knee and reauthorized it. Why? They said, 'We’ll just kick the can down the road another year.'" "The government doesn’t own private sector companies like Google, Verizon, or Apple, but they compel them to comply with federal court orders. And those companies are not allowed to inform the target of the investigation—hence the Google case with me." "Google was ordered not to tell me about the surveillance, but five years later, they could. That’s how broken the system is." "We’ve shown you how they abused FISA once already, and now you know about Chris Wray and 702 abuses. Yet they gave him more spy powers. This is why reform is critical." "Mayorkas and Wray testified to Congress that 24 known foreign terrorists entered the U.S., and they lost them. Where are they?"
8:55

Kash Patel on FBI Director Chris Wray’s Illegal Surveillance of Americans. "Chris Wray was caught last year illegally using 702 collection methods against Americans—274,000 times. That’s not my number; it’s in the report that the FISA court wrote." "The FISA court was supposed to oversee this process, but during Russiagate, they targeted an American citizen to get into a presidential campaign of all American citizens." "The problem is, the people given the FISA authorities in the deep state leadership levels—they’re the ones that abused it, broke the law, and corrupted it." "Congress had a chance to fix FISA this year, but instead, the majority in the House, Republicans included, bent the knee and reauthorized it. Why? They said, 'We’ll just kick the can down the road another year.'" "The government doesn’t own private sector companies like Google, Verizon, or Apple, but they compel them to comply with federal court orders. And those companies are not allowed to inform the target of the investigation—hence the Google case with me." "Google was ordered not to tell me about the surveillance, but five years later, they could. That’s how broken the system is." "We’ve shown you how they abused FISA once already, and now you know about Chris Wray and 702 abuses. Yet they gave him more spy powers. This is why reform is critical." "Mayorkas and Wray testified to Congress that 24 known foreign terrorists entered the U.S., and they lost them. Where are they?"

Shawn Ryan

218,609 views • 1 year ago

The sleepy Senate had hoped to send us a FISA extension with no changes that would be passed by UC to an empty House chamber. Today, we forced a vote on the Senate’s “clean” FISA extension that ignored our House bill that included a ban on a CBDC — I voted No. And so, even in our “loss,” the battle is not over, and we are forcing the fight in the right direction. We now have 45 days to continue to work for 1) a permanent ban on a Central Bank Digital Currency, 2) FISA warrant protections, and 3) the 4th Amendment not-for-sale protections (to stop the mass-purchasing of your data by intel agencies). And with the extra time, we should open up the FISA discussion beyond 702 to include reforms to Title 1 (where much of the previous bad actions have occurred).
1:39

The sleepy Senate had hoped to send us a FISA extension with no changes that would be passed by UC to an empty House chamber. Today, we forced a vote on the Senate’s “clean” FISA extension that ignored our House bill that included a ban on a CBDC — I voted No. And so, even in our “loss,” the battle is not over, and we are forcing the fight in the right direction. We now have 45 days to continue to work for 1) a permanent ban on a Central Bank Digital Currency, 2) FISA warrant protections, and 3) the 4th Amendment not-for-sale protections (to stop the mass-purchasing of your data by intel agencies). And with the extra time, we should open up the FISA discussion beyond 702 to include reforms to Title 1 (where much of the previous bad actions have occurred).

Rep. Michael Cloud

11,262 views • 4 months ago

🚨 JUST IN—IT’S OFFICIAL: Conservatives have BLOCKED an attempt to RAM THROUGH a 5 year extension of FISA in the dead of night, extending it by only 2 weeks Tim Burchett, Lauren Boebert, and Thomas Massie are out here celebrating a win against the deep state 🇺🇸🔥 “They try to bring us in all these classified briefings and tell us how DANGEROUS it is to have warrants to spy on American citizens. The briefing that we're never going to get is, ‘hi, our agency has been given TOO MUCH power by Congress!” — Rep. Boebert — Asked about how this current FISA bill relates to the powers used to spy on President Trump’s campaign, Massie said: “Today, I went in the SCIF and saw two TOP SECRET documents that showed this program is getting worse—NOT better!” When I asked how extending FISA impacts everyday Americans, Massie replied: “If you get on the government's naughty list—regardless of who is in the White House—they could put your name in this, find things about you, and then go recreate ANOTHER evidence trail to discover that because they're NEVER going to say they used FISA.” — When I asked Burchett what he thinks of FISA, and if it’s used to spy on aliens, he said: “I don’t believe in FISA. The only reason aliens don’t come down here is because there IS not intelligent life.” 🤣🔥
2:32

🚨 JUST IN—IT’S OFFICIAL: Conservatives have BLOCKED an attempt to RAM THROUGH a 5 year extension of FISA in the dead of night, extending it by only 2 weeks Tim Burchett, Lauren Boebert, and Thomas Massie are out here celebrating a win against the deep state 🇺🇸🔥 “They try to bring us in all these classified briefings and tell us how DANGEROUS it is to have warrants to spy on American citizens. The briefing that we're never going to get is, ‘hi, our agency has been given TOO MUCH power by Congress!” — Rep. Boebert — Asked about how this current FISA bill relates to the powers used to spy on President Trump’s campaign, Massie said: “Today, I went in the SCIF and saw two TOP SECRET documents that showed this program is getting worse—NOT better!” When I asked how extending FISA impacts everyday Americans, Massie replied: “If you get on the government's naughty list—regardless of who is in the White House—they could put your name in this, find things about you, and then go recreate ANOTHER evidence trail to discover that because they're NEVER going to say they used FISA.” — When I asked Burchett what he thinks of FISA, and if it’s used to spy on aliens, he said: “I don’t believe in FISA. The only reason aliens don’t come down here is because there IS not intelligent life.” 🤣🔥

Nick Sortor

2,821,741 views • 4 months ago

Senate and House Democrats, and even some Republicans, just put us on course to turn off our most valuable intelligence tool to track terrorists coming to our country. Right as the World Cup begins. The World Cup begins today. FISA expires tomorrow. Even most Democrats acknowledge that FISA is necessary to identify foreign terrorists, disrupt plots, and protect Americans from attack. They've voted for it before, so it's not a vote of conscious, it's a foolish political statement. Even some Republicans, like my political opponent, campaigned against FISA, basing their opposition upon a collection of widespread lies that I’ve debunked plenty of times before. This isn’t a symbolic vote. It’s a decision with real consequences. Thousands of lives are being put at risk for political theater.
1:37

Senate and House Democrats, and even some Republicans, just put us on course to turn off our most valuable intelligence tool to track terrorists coming to our country. Right as the World Cup begins. The World Cup begins today. FISA expires tomorrow. Even most Democrats acknowledge that FISA is necessary to identify foreign terrorists, disrupt plots, and protect Americans from attack. They've voted for it before, so it's not a vote of conscious, it's a foolish political statement. Even some Republicans, like my political opponent, campaigned against FISA, basing their opposition upon a collection of widespread lies that I’ve debunked plenty of times before. This isn’t a symbolic vote. It’s a decision with real consequences. Thousands of lives are being put at risk for political theater.

Dan Crenshaw

44,732 views • 2 months ago

Here’s a crash course on the FISA 702 warrant debate. I’m not going to mince words - the Congressmen demanding a warrant to simply search a database full of foreign terrorist and foreign intelligence conversations are refusing to learn the basic facts. Let’s do a thought exercise: if you get a warrant to tap a criminal’s phone, do you think police just ignore the people he speaks to? No of course not. They hear it. And if the police want to hear more about the person on the other side of the phone call, they get a new warrant for it. THAT IS ALSO HOW FISA WORKS. Stupidity is a choice. These Members of Congress refusing to listen to the facts and President Trump aren’t “guardians of civil liberty.” They are dishonest fools looking for affirmation from social media. The worst part? They’ve been told the facts in classified sessions, and THEY DO NOT CARE. They couldn’t care less if an attack kills Americans and it could have been prevented. They know they won’t get blamed. They know the internet will make up some other absurd narrative and they’ll jump on board. It’s disgraceful.
1:43

Here’s a crash course on the FISA 702 warrant debate. I’m not going to mince words - the Congressmen demanding a warrant to simply search a database full of foreign terrorist and foreign intelligence conversations are refusing to learn the basic facts. Let’s do a thought exercise: if you get a warrant to tap a criminal’s phone, do you think police just ignore the people he speaks to? No of course not. They hear it. And if the police want to hear more about the person on the other side of the phone call, they get a new warrant for it. THAT IS ALSO HOW FISA WORKS. Stupidity is a choice. These Members of Congress refusing to listen to the facts and President Trump aren’t “guardians of civil liberty.” They are dishonest fools looking for affirmation from social media. The worst part? They’ve been told the facts in classified sessions, and THEY DO NOT CARE. They couldn’t care less if an attack kills Americans and it could have been prevented. They know they won’t get blamed. They know the internet will make up some other absurd narrative and they’ll jump on board. It’s disgraceful.

Dan Crenshaw

42,913 views • 4 months ago

This is the beginning of the war against the most violent and deranged cartel in Mexico: El Cartel Jalisco Nuevo Generación. Or CJNG. Their leader “El Mencho” was killed today in a raid by Mexican Special Forces using US intelligence. These elite forces train with us regularly. Over the past year most of the attention has been on the Sinaloa cartel. This is a much needed refocusing on CJNG. Both are major traffickers of fentanyl, but CJNG is more like ISIS than the mafia. They are ruthlessly violent, currently terrorizing all parts of Mexico to intimidate the government back into submission. Congress needs to actually pay attention. I’ve authored a dozen pieces of legislation to support our military, intelligence, and law enforcement efforts in Mexico. It’s time for Committees to take them up. We finally have a solid partner in the Mexican Government to work with. We are finally focusing huge intelligence collection efforts on the cartels (due in large part to my amendment to FISA two years ago authorizing collection on the cartels). We are finally taking them on. It won’t be over soon. But it’s about time we started. 🧵
0:22

This is the beginning of the war against the most violent and deranged cartel in Mexico: El Cartel Jalisco Nuevo Generación. Or CJNG. Their leader “El Mencho” was killed today in a raid by Mexican Special Forces using US intelligence. These elite forces train with us regularly. Over the past year most of the attention has been on the Sinaloa cartel. This is a much needed refocusing on CJNG. Both are major traffickers of fentanyl, but CJNG is more like ISIS than the mafia. They are ruthlessly violent, currently terrorizing all parts of Mexico to intimidate the government back into submission. Congress needs to actually pay attention. I’ve authored a dozen pieces of legislation to support our military, intelligence, and law enforcement efforts in Mexico. It’s time for Committees to take them up. We finally have a solid partner in the Mexican Government to work with. We are finally focusing huge intelligence collection efforts on the cartels (due in large part to my amendment to FISA two years ago authorizing collection on the cartels). We are finally taking them on. It won’t be over soon. But it’s about time we started. 🧵

Dan Crenshaw

668,095 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇸🇲🇽 REP. LUNA TORCHES MEXICAN PRESIDENT: “IF WE LISTENED TO HER, CARTELS WOULD RUN AMERICA” "They had one of the bloodiest election cycles this past cycle and they killed journalists that were covering it. They killed their own elected officials that were trying to fight the cartel. I don't care what the president of Mexico has to say because in my opinion she's only in that position because she's been installed and if they actually had a good president you would see Mexico not being run by cartels." Source: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, Fox News
0:20

🇺🇸🇲🇽 REP. LUNA TORCHES MEXICAN PRESIDENT: “IF WE LISTENED TO HER, CARTELS WOULD RUN AMERICA” "They had one of the bloodiest election cycles this past cycle and they killed journalists that were covering it. They killed their own elected officials that were trying to fight the cartel. I don't care what the president of Mexico has to say because in my opinion she's only in that position because she's been installed and if they actually had a good president you would see Mexico not being run by cartels." Source: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, Fox News

Mario Nawfal

35,845 views • 7 months ago

When liberals don't get their way, they LOSE their sense of CONTROL. "I think we're falling into tribalism to the point where if you don't agree with the president, it is okay to be disrespectful to the country. It's okay to be disrespectful to the Constitution and to act without civility. As a person who was a teacher, students would say things that other students would disagree with. I didn't say it was okay to walk outside the classroom. We expect a certain level of decorum, class, and civility that we all have as Americans. What we're seeing now with the left is because they didn't get their way, even though Barack Obama deported many more people than President Trump, even though he talked about tariffs. Now, a lot of things that were common sense before, they disagree with because it is politically advantageous."
1:24

When liberals don't get their way, they LOSE their sense of CONTROL. "I think we're falling into tribalism to the point where if you don't agree with the president, it is okay to be disrespectful to the country. It's okay to be disrespectful to the Constitution and to act without civility. As a person who was a teacher, students would say things that other students would disagree with. I didn't say it was okay to walk outside the classroom. We expect a certain level of decorum, class, and civility that we all have as Americans. What we're seeing now with the left is because they didn't get their way, even though Barack Obama deported many more people than President Trump, even though he talked about tariffs. Now, a lot of things that were common sense before, they disagree with because it is politically advantageous."

DeVory Darkins

61,998 views • 6 months ago

Marjorie Taylor Greene: These are 13 lives that I believe should not have been lost. This war is not something Americans voted for in 2024. As a matter of fact, we voted for the opposite. We voted for no more foreign wars, no more regime change. And we were told by many members of the administration throughout the campaign — JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and others — that they believed going to war with Iran would be a terrible idea. It was something that Charlie Kirk himself had said over and over again, and Donald Trump — President Trump. I voted for him three times. I fought for him to become president, and I still want him to be successful. But he told Americans for over ten years — and even longer — that he thought foreign wars and regime change were a bad direction for America to go in. And we trusted and believed him that we wouldn’t be doing this. But this was an unprovoked war, and Israel pulled us into it — pulled America into it. And so those are 13 lives that should not have been lost.
1:41

Marjorie Taylor Greene: These are 13 lives that I believe should not have been lost. This war is not something Americans voted for in 2024. As a matter of fact, we voted for the opposite. We voted for no more foreign wars, no more regime change. And we were told by many members of the administration throughout the campaign — JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and others — that they believed going to war with Iran would be a terrible idea. It was something that Charlie Kirk himself had said over and over again, and Donald Trump — President Trump. I voted for him three times. I fought for him to become president, and I still want him to be successful. But he told Americans for over ten years — and even longer — that he thought foreign wars and regime change were a bad direction for America to go in. And we trusted and believed him that we wouldn’t be doing this. But this was an unprovoked war, and Israel pulled us into it — pulled America into it. And so those are 13 lives that should not have been lost.

Acyn

52,785 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson just CONFIRMED the GOP healthcare bill that passed tonight will DECREASE premiums by 11%, with NO ACA extensions for Big, Rich Insurance 🔥 "It gives persons more options, more flexibility in their health care and also it adds transparency." THIS IS HUGE! "We had the PBM, pharmacy benefit manager, transparency piece to it as well. Now contrast that with the Democrats, COVID era subsidy that they wanted to extend that would only impact 7% of Americans." "The bill we just passed impacts 100% of Americans. Their version would impact 7% of Americans and it would cost taxpayers $350 billion." "That is not the way to reduce the cost of health care. The Democrats do not want a solution, they just demonstrated, because they voted against this bill. They want an issue for the election. It is based on a false narrative." "The Democrats broke America's health care system. When they gave us the ACA, the unaffordable care act 15 years ago, they promised that premiums would come down that access would increase in quality of health care would increase. None of that happened because it's a flawed system." "Their response right now is to subsidize and continue to shovel taxpayer dollars onto a broken system. We say enough is enough!" "The Republican Party is the party that is bringing the ideas forward to fix this crisis and fix this problem for everyone. It is a serious problem." "We took a big step tonight to do that. We hope that this could sign in law quickly because it will have the desired effect. We hope the Senate can get this done in short order."
1:41

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson just CONFIRMED the GOP healthcare bill that passed tonight will DECREASE premiums by 11%, with NO ACA extensions for Big, Rich Insurance 🔥 "It gives persons more options, more flexibility in their health care and also it adds transparency." THIS IS HUGE! "We had the PBM, pharmacy benefit manager, transparency piece to it as well. Now contrast that with the Democrats, COVID era subsidy that they wanted to extend that would only impact 7% of Americans." "The bill we just passed impacts 100% of Americans. Their version would impact 7% of Americans and it would cost taxpayers $350 billion." "That is not the way to reduce the cost of health care. The Democrats do not want a solution, they just demonstrated, because they voted against this bill. They want an issue for the election. It is based on a false narrative." "The Democrats broke America's health care system. When they gave us the ACA, the unaffordable care act 15 years ago, they promised that premiums would come down that access would increase in quality of health care would increase. None of that happened because it's a flawed system." "Their response right now is to subsidize and continue to shovel taxpayer dollars onto a broken system. We say enough is enough!" "The Republican Party is the party that is bringing the ideas forward to fix this crisis and fix this problem for everyone. It is a serious problem." "We took a big step tonight to do that. We hope that this could sign in law quickly because it will have the desired effect. We hope the Senate can get this done in short order."

Eric Daugherty

545,189 views • 8 months ago

Trump just dropped a bombshell on Congress—Trump cancels DNI hearings and threatens to hold FISA bill HOSTAGE to push Congress to pass the Save America Act. As Sen. John Kennedy just said on Fox, President Trump is AGGRESSIVELY UNPREDICTABLE. TRUMP: "It's all we want. The Save America Act. And that can be passed any way they want to pass it, but I'm not going to sign FISA unless it's done. And this was like a rush act. And it was a rush act by the Democrats. And why are they afraid of this guy [Bill Pulte]? I mean, they're so afraid of him, they'll do anything not to have Pulte go in there. He's a very capable guy, and they're worried about that."
1:12

Trump just dropped a bombshell on Congress—Trump cancels DNI hearings and threatens to hold FISA bill HOSTAGE to push Congress to pass the Save America Act. As Sen. John Kennedy just said on Fox, President Trump is AGGRESSIVELY UNPREDICTABLE. TRUMP: "It's all we want. The Save America Act. And that can be passed any way they want to pass it, but I'm not going to sign FISA unless it's done. And this was like a rush act. And it was a rush act by the Democrats. And why are they afraid of this guy [Bill Pulte]? I mean, they're so afraid of him, they'll do anything not to have Pulte go in there. He's a very capable guy, and they're worried about that."

DeVory Darkins

31,943 views • 2 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: Rebel TMC MP Rachna Banerjee, says, "There can never be any rebellion against her (Mamata Banerjee). We have shared a very old relationship with Didi, and that relationship will always remain the same. The respect we have for her will always remain. But one thing is true... everyone says that we received votes because of Didi. That is correct. We got votes because of Didi, because Didi herself is the identity and symbol of the Trinamool Congress. In Trinamool Congress, the face people recognise and trust is Didi’s face, and we all respect her deeply. People voted after seeing Didi, and they voted for Rachna Banerjee not because they were impressed by my face, but because they believed I would be able to work for them. Didi was the face behind it, and after that they gave us their votes with the expectation that I would do good work for the people and for my constituency. There was absolutely no resentment. But I felt that if the Central government and the State government were ruled by the same side, then getting work done would become much easier... something we have not really seen over the past 15 years." "People want us to do something for them, to carry out good work for them. And to make that happen, support from the Centre is very important. So at times, with due respect to Didi, I felt that while staying with her, there were many instances where obstacles were created in our work, and we were unable to do the kind of work we actually wanted to do.” #TMC #RachnaBanerjee (Full video available on PTI Videos -
3:25

VIDEO | Delhi: Rebel TMC MP Rachna Banerjee, says, "There can never be any rebellion against her (Mamata Banerjee). We have shared a very old relationship with Didi, and that relationship will always remain the same. The respect we have for her will always remain. But one thing is true... everyone says that we received votes because of Didi. That is correct. We got votes because of Didi, because Didi herself is the identity and symbol of the Trinamool Congress. In Trinamool Congress, the face people recognise and trust is Didi’s face, and we all respect her deeply. People voted after seeing Didi, and they voted for Rachna Banerjee not because they were impressed by my face, but because they believed I would be able to work for them. Didi was the face behind it, and after that they gave us their votes with the expectation that I would do good work for the people and for my constituency. There was absolutely no resentment. But I felt that if the Central government and the State government were ruled by the same side, then getting work done would become much easier... something we have not really seen over the past 15 years." "People want us to do something for them, to carry out good work for them. And to make that happen, support from the Centre is very important. So at times, with due respect to Didi, I felt that while staying with her, there were many instances where obstacles were created in our work, and we were unable to do the kind of work we actually wanted to do.” #TMC #RachnaBanerjee (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

197,164 views • 2 months ago