Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇺🇦🇷🇺 UKRAINE’S U.S. AMBASSADOR ON THE CORRUPTION SCANDAL, THE FAILED PEACE TALKS, & RUSSIA’S MILITARY ADVANCEMENTS Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says the latest wave of U.S.-Russia-China diplomacy is not a step toward peace. It is a stage where Putin is signaling endurance, shaping narratives, and dragging...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

2,718,807 subscribers

1,342,851 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразованиеНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🌍 THE WAR PUTIN IS USING TO BREAK EUROPE A leaked peace plan is circulating, but according to Serhii Plokhy, the truth is far more dangerous. He says Putin is not looking for peace. He is buying time, playing history, and pushing a slow, grinding war designed to break Ukraine and split the West. And the stakes are rising on every front. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Putin sees the war as an imperial restoration, not a negotiation •⁠ ⁠⁠Why slow Russian advances with massive losses still serve his strategy •⁠ ⁠⁠How sanctions strike hard but need time and discipline to cripple the Kremlin •⁠ ⁠⁠Why cracks inside the Western alliance are now Putin’s biggest weapon •⁠ ⁠⁠How Russia keeps its war machine running even as its economy strains •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Ukraine’s shift toward Europe triggered the conflict long before NATO mattered •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Russian drones, cyber attacks and provocations are pressure tests on NATO’s red lines •⁠ ⁠⁠How close the world actually came to nuclear escalation in 2022 •⁠ ⁠⁠And why the fate of this war will shape Europe’s borders for a generation His warning is blunt. Russia is not negotiating. Russia is maneuvering. And the window to contain this war is shrinking fast. If Ukraine collapses, he says Europe will face a far more aggressive Russia backed by a rising China. If Ukraine holds, the entire balance of power in the West will shift. This is one of the most consequential wars since 1945. And the next decisions will echo for decades. 01:49 – Initial reaction to the peace plan: back to square one 02:38 – Historian draws parallels to Korea and Vietnam peace talks 04:23 – Russia has incentives to keep fighting, not negotiate 04:55 – Russia using $30k bonuses to recruit new troops 06:28 – Cracks in the Western alliance while Russia holds economically 07:25 – Are new Lukoil and Rosneft sanctions strong enough 08:38 – Sanctions need time and pressure; only crisis shifts Putin 12:30 – Putin driven by legacy and restoring a Russian empire 14:24 – Multipolar vision requires Ukraine’s resources 16:24 – Real trigger was Ukraine’s 2014 EU Association Agreement 18:28 – Is bombing Ukraine counterproductive to bringing it closer 19:45 – Russia turned Chechnya from rebellion to loyal ally 21:29 – If Ukraine falls, its fighters could become Russian shock troops 24:34 – Putin genuinely believes his historical narrative 26:59 – NATO expansion a concern but not the core trigger 27:31 – West repeatedly said Ukraine had no future in NATO 30:22 – Russia provoking NATO because it knows NATO won’t respond 32:49 – Aid provision is a normal international practice 38:33 – 2008 Bucharest Summit was the real turning point 40:32 – NATO used as an excuse for deeper strategic motives 41:18 – Comparison to Cuba Missile Crisis: missiles near borders 43:13 – West refuses permanent troops in new NATO states 53:12 – NATO won’t be ready to confront Russia until 2029 57:04 – War ends with a sharper, more defiant line 58:31 – War created a stronger Ukrainian national identity 01:03:05 – Putin’s legacy now mixed with declining influence
1:04:40

🌍 THE WAR PUTIN IS USING TO BREAK EUROPE A leaked peace plan is circulating, but according to Serhii Plokhy, the truth is far more dangerous. He says Putin is not looking for peace. He is buying time, playing history, and pushing a slow, grinding war designed to break Ukraine and split the West. And the stakes are rising on every front. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Putin sees the war as an imperial restoration, not a negotiation •⁠ ⁠⁠Why slow Russian advances with massive losses still serve his strategy •⁠ ⁠⁠How sanctions strike hard but need time and discipline to cripple the Kremlin •⁠ ⁠⁠Why cracks inside the Western alliance are now Putin’s biggest weapon •⁠ ⁠⁠How Russia keeps its war machine running even as its economy strains •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Ukraine’s shift toward Europe triggered the conflict long before NATO mattered •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Russian drones, cyber attacks and provocations are pressure tests on NATO’s red lines •⁠ ⁠⁠How close the world actually came to nuclear escalation in 2022 •⁠ ⁠⁠And why the fate of this war will shape Europe’s borders for a generation His warning is blunt. Russia is not negotiating. Russia is maneuvering. And the window to contain this war is shrinking fast. If Ukraine collapses, he says Europe will face a far more aggressive Russia backed by a rising China. If Ukraine holds, the entire balance of power in the West will shift. This is one of the most consequential wars since 1945. And the next decisions will echo for decades. 01:49 – Initial reaction to the peace plan: back to square one 02:38 – Historian draws parallels to Korea and Vietnam peace talks 04:23 – Russia has incentives to keep fighting, not negotiate 04:55 – Russia using $30k bonuses to recruit new troops 06:28 – Cracks in the Western alliance while Russia holds economically 07:25 – Are new Lukoil and Rosneft sanctions strong enough 08:38 – Sanctions need time and pressure; only crisis shifts Putin 12:30 – Putin driven by legacy and restoring a Russian empire 14:24 – Multipolar vision requires Ukraine’s resources 16:24 – Real trigger was Ukraine’s 2014 EU Association Agreement 18:28 – Is bombing Ukraine counterproductive to bringing it closer 19:45 – Russia turned Chechnya from rebellion to loyal ally 21:29 – If Ukraine falls, its fighters could become Russian shock troops 24:34 – Putin genuinely believes his historical narrative 26:59 – NATO expansion a concern but not the core trigger 27:31 – West repeatedly said Ukraine had no future in NATO 30:22 – Russia provoking NATO because it knows NATO won’t respond 32:49 – Aid provision is a normal international practice 38:33 – 2008 Bucharest Summit was the real turning point 40:32 – NATO used as an excuse for deeper strategic motives 41:18 – Comparison to Cuba Missile Crisis: missiles near borders 43:13 – West refuses permanent troops in new NATO states 53:12 – NATO won’t be ready to confront Russia until 2029 57:04 – War ends with a sharper, more defiant line 58:31 – War created a stronger Ukrainian national identity 01:03:05 – Putin’s legacy now mixed with declining influence

Mario Nawfal

1,741,462 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺 LT. GENERAL YEVGENY BUZHINSKY ON NATO, NUCLEAR WAR, AND U.S-RUSSIA RELATIONS Lt. General Yevgeny Buzhinsky, the mastermind behind some of the biggest weapons treaties of the past 40 years—including the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty—sat down with me for a rare and unfiltered interview. From NATO’s role in escalating global tensions to Trump’s return and its impact on U.S-Russia relations, Buzhinsky provides a behind-the-scenes look at how Russia views the world—and what it might take to end the war in Ukraine. 1:18 - “The IMF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty constrained us.” 5:21 - NATO: How it impacted Russia. 7:58 - The relationship between Russia and the U.S. 9:41 - Nuclear war looming? - “The escalation is imminent.” 12:59 - NATO and U.S crossing red lines. 15:22 - Putin’s response to missiles and Trump’s return. 19:41 - Opinions on the new U.S administration - “Ukraine is not an American ally.” 21:24 - Trump’s plans for peace. 25:03 - Could Russia and the U.S become allies? 30:58 - How Ukraine and Russia could end the war. 37:19 - Russia’s losses are an exaggeration? 40:48 - Russia’s terms for a ceasefire. 45:52 - Russia and North Korea: “Who said we need support?”
50:42

🚨🇷🇺 LT. GENERAL YEVGENY BUZHINSKY ON NATO, NUCLEAR WAR, AND U.S-RUSSIA RELATIONS Lt. General Yevgeny Buzhinsky, the mastermind behind some of the biggest weapons treaties of the past 40 years—including the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty—sat down with me for a rare and unfiltered interview. From NATO’s role in escalating global tensions to Trump’s return and its impact on U.S-Russia relations, Buzhinsky provides a behind-the-scenes look at how Russia views the world—and what it might take to end the war in Ukraine. 1:18 - “The IMF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty constrained us.” 5:21 - NATO: How it impacted Russia. 7:58 - The relationship between Russia and the U.S. 9:41 - Nuclear war looming? - “The escalation is imminent.” 12:59 - NATO and U.S crossing red lines. 15:22 - Putin’s response to missiles and Trump’s return. 19:41 - Opinions on the new U.S administration - “Ukraine is not an American ally.” 21:24 - Trump’s plans for peace. 25:03 - Could Russia and the U.S become allies? 30:58 - How Ukraine and Russia could end the war. 37:19 - Russia’s losses are an exaggeration? 40:48 - Russia’s terms for a ceasefire. 45:52 - Russia and North Korea: “Who said we need support?”

Mario Nawfal

2,350,199 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support
1:06:33

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support

Mario Nawfal

1,828,232 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "WE DON'T HAVE TIME - WE ARE LOSING MANY LIVES EVERY DAY WHILE RUSSIA WAITS US OUT" Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says something few Americans hear plainly: Russia has time, Ukraine doesn't. While Washington debates sanctions and diplomacy, Moscow stretches the war by dragging its feet, hiding casualties, and leaning on China, North Korea, and Iran for support. She warns that sanctions only work if they’re enforced and that Russia has spent years perfecting ways to dodge them. And as Ukraine loses lives every day, she says the U.S. will eventually face a choice: either increase pressure on Moscow or watch Russia stall until the war bends in its favor. "Russia plays delay tactics, pretending to negotiate while refusing to take real decisions. They send Russians to die outside their own territory so nobody inside Russia sees the cost. They can take as much time as they want as long as China, North Korea and Iran back them. We do not have time. We are losing many lives every day while Russia waits us out."
3:41

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "WE DON'T HAVE TIME - WE ARE LOSING MANY LIVES EVERY DAY WHILE RUSSIA WAITS US OUT" Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says something few Americans hear plainly: Russia has time, Ukraine doesn't. While Washington debates sanctions and diplomacy, Moscow stretches the war by dragging its feet, hiding casualties, and leaning on China, North Korea, and Iran for support. She warns that sanctions only work if they’re enforced and that Russia has spent years perfecting ways to dodge them. And as Ukraine loses lives every day, she says the U.S. will eventually face a choice: either increase pressure on Moscow or watch Russia stall until the war bends in its favor. "Russia plays delay tactics, pretending to negotiate while refusing to take real decisions. They send Russians to die outside their own territory so nobody inside Russia sees the cost. They can take as much time as they want as long as China, North Korea and Iran back them. We do not have time. We are losing many lives every day while Russia waits us out."

Mario Nawfal

72,776 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇷🇺 PUTIN SLAMS NATO CHIEF: “ARE YOU PREPARING FOR WAR THAT EVEN THE U.S. DIDN’T DECLARE?” Putin has launched a direct attack on incoming NATO chief Rutte, accusing him of stoking unnecessary conflict and preparing for a war that the U.S. itself hasn’t declared. Pointing to the latest U.S. National Security Strategy, Putin argued that Washington does not officially label Russia as an enemy, raising sharp questions about why NATO leaders continue escalating their rhetoric. "I really want to ask [to Rutte]. What are you talking about? A war with Russia? They want to prepare a war with Russia. Do you even know how to read? Read the new US national security strategy. What does it say? The USA is the creator of NATO, the main sponsor. In the new national security strategy, Russia is not indicated as an enemy, as a target, and the NATO chief is preparing a war with us. What is this?" Source: Visegrad24
1:46

🇷🇺 PUTIN SLAMS NATO CHIEF: “ARE YOU PREPARING FOR WAR THAT EVEN THE U.S. DIDN’T DECLARE?” Putin has launched a direct attack on incoming NATO chief Rutte, accusing him of stoking unnecessary conflict and preparing for a war that the U.S. itself hasn’t declared. Pointing to the latest U.S. National Security Strategy, Putin argued that Washington does not officially label Russia as an enemy, raising sharp questions about why NATO leaders continue escalating their rhetoric. "I really want to ask [to Rutte]. What are you talking about? A war with Russia? They want to prepare a war with Russia. Do you even know how to read? Read the new US national security strategy. What does it say? The USA is the creator of NATO, the main sponsor. In the new national security strategy, Russia is not indicated as an enemy, as a target, and the NATO chief is preparing a war with us. What is this?" Source: Visegrad24

Mario Nawfal

279,124 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇷🇺 “UKRAINE’S WAR CAN ONLY END IF PUTIN OR KYIV FALL” 2 radically different visions of the Ukraine war. 2 starkly opposed truths. In a fiery debate, Jonathan Fink (Jonathan Fink 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 Silicon Curtain Podcast) and Mark Sleboda (Mark Sleboda) lay out why a peace deal may never come, and why neither side is ready to stop fighting. Jonathan argues Putin doesn’t want territory, he wants a failed Ukraine. A democratic Ukraine, he says, is a threat to Putin’s regime, because it offers Russians an alternative: “They tried democracy… and it worked.” Mark fires back: the U.S. provoked this war and is now trying to force “peace on American terms.” He insists Russia is winning, not just against Kyiv, but against the entire West: “They’ve run out of ammo. We haven’t.” We get into: •⁠ ⁠Whether Russia wants all of Ukraine, or just to neutralize it. •⁠ ⁠Why the West keeps pushing ceasefires Russia rejects. •⁠ ⁠NATO expansion, proxy war narratives, and regime survival. •⁠ ⁠Why both Trump and Biden failed to deter escalation. •⁠ ⁠The fight over Ukraine’s media, and who funds what. •⁠ ⁠Is it about democracy vs. autocracy, or something deeper? •⁠ ⁠Why both say nuclear escalation is a real risk. •⁠ ⁠Whether U.S. “support” is really just managed decline. Mark: “Russia is outproducing the entire West in artillery.” Jonathan: “If Russia is winning, why are they still 45km from Severodonetsk?” A blistering clash, not just of ideas, but of worldviews. 05:05 - “Russia is winning not just against Kyiv, but against all of NATO” 06:38 - Trump’s peace plan excludes Russia, a “pointless circle jerk” 10:08 - U.S. NGO funding criticized as “poking the bear.” Did it provoke war? 11:45 - RT vs. U.S. media: both foreign-backed, but only one is banned 13:23 - Trump halted aid, threatened Ukraine, but wanted to “look good” with peace 14:59 - Trump seeks Nobel Peace Prize, but won’t risk confrontation with Russia 19:41 - Russia won't stop until Ukraine regime changes, maybe not even then 21:17 - Why Ukraine won't cede territory it fortified, deterrence matters 24:26 - Europe rearming slowly, but Kremlin-aligned populists may derail it 26:01 - Russia uses nuclear fear to deter deeper U.S. involvement 30:52 - Mark: Only China wins from U.S. exhaustion in Ukraine, Venezuela, and Iran 32:12 - Russia’s democracy “just as valid” as the U.S. 36:05 - Russian citizens afraid to speak near cameras, fear still shapes daily life 41:13 - Why won’t Putin accept freezing the frontlines? “They’re winning.” 45:08 - Russian ambassador: “We don’t want peace, we want surrender.”
57:38

🇺🇸🇷🇺 “UKRAINE’S WAR CAN ONLY END IF PUTIN OR KYIV FALL” 2 radically different visions of the Ukraine war. 2 starkly opposed truths. In a fiery debate, Jonathan Fink (Jonathan Fink 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 Silicon Curtain Podcast) and Mark Sleboda (Mark Sleboda) lay out why a peace deal may never come, and why neither side is ready to stop fighting. Jonathan argues Putin doesn’t want territory, he wants a failed Ukraine. A democratic Ukraine, he says, is a threat to Putin’s regime, because it offers Russians an alternative: “They tried democracy… and it worked.” Mark fires back: the U.S. provoked this war and is now trying to force “peace on American terms.” He insists Russia is winning, not just against Kyiv, but against the entire West: “They’ve run out of ammo. We haven’t.” We get into: •⁠ ⁠Whether Russia wants all of Ukraine, or just to neutralize it. •⁠ ⁠Why the West keeps pushing ceasefires Russia rejects. •⁠ ⁠NATO expansion, proxy war narratives, and regime survival. •⁠ ⁠Why both Trump and Biden failed to deter escalation. •⁠ ⁠The fight over Ukraine’s media, and who funds what. •⁠ ⁠Is it about democracy vs. autocracy, or something deeper? •⁠ ⁠Why both say nuclear escalation is a real risk. •⁠ ⁠Whether U.S. “support” is really just managed decline. Mark: “Russia is outproducing the entire West in artillery.” Jonathan: “If Russia is winning, why are they still 45km from Severodonetsk?” A blistering clash, not just of ideas, but of worldviews. 05:05 - “Russia is winning not just against Kyiv, but against all of NATO” 06:38 - Trump’s peace plan excludes Russia, a “pointless circle jerk” 10:08 - U.S. NGO funding criticized as “poking the bear.” Did it provoke war? 11:45 - RT vs. U.S. media: both foreign-backed, but only one is banned 13:23 - Trump halted aid, threatened Ukraine, but wanted to “look good” with peace 14:59 - Trump seeks Nobel Peace Prize, but won’t risk confrontation with Russia 19:41 - Russia won't stop until Ukraine regime changes, maybe not even then 21:17 - Why Ukraine won't cede territory it fortified, deterrence matters 24:26 - Europe rearming slowly, but Kremlin-aligned populists may derail it 26:01 - Russia uses nuclear fear to deter deeper U.S. involvement 30:52 - Mark: Only China wins from U.S. exhaustion in Ukraine, Venezuela, and Iran 32:12 - Russia’s democracy “just as valid” as the U.S. 36:05 - Russian citizens afraid to speak near cameras, fear still shapes daily life 41:13 - Why won’t Putin accept freezing the frontlines? “They’re winning.” 45:08 - Russian ambassador: “We don’t want peace, we want surrender.”

Mario Nawfal

2,453,015 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.
2:13

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 просмотров • 2 лет назад

From Russia's perspective, the war began due to the NATO-backed coup in Kyiv in 2014 and efforts from the first day after the coup to transform what had been an overwhelmingly Russian-friendly country into a hostile, anti-Russian frontline state. Over the next 8 years, NATO ignored the Minsk peace agreement and instead used the time to entrench itself in Ukraine and build a powerful Ukrainian proxy army and intelligence services to weaken Russia as a strategic rival. Russia then invaded in 2022 with the key objective (by either military or diplomatic means) of ensuring that NATO and its intelligence agencies are dislodged from Ukraine. Territorial acquisitions are seen as a guarantor that these regions will never be used as a NATO frontline. To prevent the destruction of Ukraine and avoid a direct war that would likely escalate into a nuclear exchange, it is imperative to recognise the security concerns of Russia. Instead, the UK and France commit themselves to “build protected facilities for weapons and military equipment”in Ukraine after the war, which ensures that the war cannot end. It does not matter if NATO countries believe they are fighting for “democracy” and “freedom”; Russia sees this as an existential threat and will act accordingly. Ask yourself why these European leaders have sabotaged every peace initiative, boycotted diplomacy for almost 4 years, insists that deterrence is the only path to security, while smearing and censoring dissent. This is not to "stand to Ukraine", but an effort to fight to the last Ukrainian.
1:30

From Russia's perspective, the war began due to the NATO-backed coup in Kyiv in 2014 and efforts from the first day after the coup to transform what had been an overwhelmingly Russian-friendly country into a hostile, anti-Russian frontline state. Over the next 8 years, NATO ignored the Minsk peace agreement and instead used the time to entrench itself in Ukraine and build a powerful Ukrainian proxy army and intelligence services to weaken Russia as a strategic rival. Russia then invaded in 2022 with the key objective (by either military or diplomatic means) of ensuring that NATO and its intelligence agencies are dislodged from Ukraine. Territorial acquisitions are seen as a guarantor that these regions will never be used as a NATO frontline. To prevent the destruction of Ukraine and avoid a direct war that would likely escalate into a nuclear exchange, it is imperative to recognise the security concerns of Russia. Instead, the UK and France commit themselves to “build protected facilities for weapons and military equipment”in Ukraine after the war, which ensures that the war cannot end. It does not matter if NATO countries believe they are fighting for “democracy” and “freedom”; Russia sees this as an existential threat and will act accordingly. Ask yourself why these European leaders have sabotaged every peace initiative, boycotted diplomacy for almost 4 years, insists that deterrence is the only path to security, while smearing and censoring dissent. This is not to "stand to Ukraine", but an effort to fight to the last Ukrainian.

Glenn Diesen

112,038 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇷🇺🇺🇦 "RUSSIA IS USING HUMAN LIVES AND ITS WAR MACHINE" Russia keeps trying to turn every hard moment on the battlefield into a big dramatic storyline, and Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says it is all aimed at one audience. She believes the Kremlin is using these narratives to influence the American government and to exploit the idea that Trump wants to end the war quickly. According to Stefanishyna, Russia is framing places like Pokrovsk as huge turning points even though Ukraine faces dozens of intense combat zones every week. She says it is a performance meant to look like strength while hiding what she describes as military exhaustion and desperation. At the same time, Stefanishyna argues that a ceasefire will eventually come, but the real question is who decides the price of that deal: Ukraine or outside powers like the U.S. "Russia builds a narrative around Pokrovsk as the battle of battles to pretend they are succeeding. They are trying to speculate with the intention of Trump to end the war. They are using human lives and their war machine. Every war ends with a deal, but the price of that deal will be decided not only in Ukraine but also here in the U.S."
3:32

🇷🇺🇺🇦 "RUSSIA IS USING HUMAN LIVES AND ITS WAR MACHINE" Russia keeps trying to turn every hard moment on the battlefield into a big dramatic storyline, and Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says it is all aimed at one audience. She believes the Kremlin is using these narratives to influence the American government and to exploit the idea that Trump wants to end the war quickly. According to Stefanishyna, Russia is framing places like Pokrovsk as huge turning points even though Ukraine faces dozens of intense combat zones every week. She says it is a performance meant to look like strength while hiding what she describes as military exhaustion and desperation. At the same time, Stefanishyna argues that a ceasefire will eventually come, but the real question is who decides the price of that deal: Ukraine or outside powers like the U.S. "Russia builds a narrative around Pokrovsk as the battle of battles to pretend they are succeeding. They are trying to speculate with the intention of Trump to end the war. They are using human lives and their war machine. Every war ends with a deal, but the price of that deal will be decided not only in Ukraine but also here in the U.S."

Mario Nawfal

17,238 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

1. Russia attacks NATO member Romania. 2. All European NATO leaders immediately excuse the Russian military attack that targeted civilians as accidental on Russia's behalf, despite Russia not claiming that it was an accident. (Odd right?) 3. Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council Medvedev confirms the attack on NATO and tells the Europeans: "Shut up. This is just the beginning." Says more attacks on NATO are coming. Is it time for some European NATO members to give Russia some of their land and people in the name of "peace," as they'd been pressuring Ukraine to do for 12 years? According to them there is no military solution when Russia attacks - only negotiations. Get on it, you cowards.
0:28

1. Russia attacks NATO member Romania. 2. All European NATO leaders immediately excuse the Russian military attack that targeted civilians as accidental on Russia's behalf, despite Russia not claiming that it was an accident. (Odd right?) 3. Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council Medvedev confirms the attack on NATO and tells the Europeans: "Shut up. This is just the beginning." Says more attacks on NATO are coming. Is it time for some European NATO members to give Russia some of their land and people in the name of "peace," as they'd been pressuring Ukraine to do for 12 years? According to them there is no military solution when Russia attacks - only negotiations. Get on it, you cowards.

Igor Sushko

117,312 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🧵 Why is Europe now suddenly and urgently preparing for war, 3 years late? March 16th, 2022 - the US continued to refuse to arm Ukraine as Russia approached Kyiv. The arbitrary redlines we all heard on why we can't help Ukraine were in fact made up - agreed to between Biden and Putin to ensure quick Ukrainian capitulation, in exchange for Russian promise to stop at Ukraine and not invade NATO countries. But Ukraine shockingly defeated Russia in the Battle for Kyiv without US military assistance. The calculus had to change and the US began to arm Ukraine within the agreed-upon red lines, such as no strikes against Russia. Not a single F-16 ever delivered. Seeing the US delay, trickle, and refuse to send arms to Ukraine was like pulling teeth. Now you know why. All the things you know were insane without a rational explanation. Now we have the explanation and the partisan hacks refuse to open their eyes. As the leader of NATO, the US forced Europeans to get in line, undoubtedly assuring them that Russia will stop at Ukraine, as was agreed with Putin. But Ukraine just would not capitulate, no matter how little military support the West sent to Ukraine. The US sent $15B worth of arms per year while Russia burned through $150B annually ($462 billion adjusted for purchasing power). Now that the Biden-Putin pact is dead with the new US administration, the Europeans are freaking out, because there is no longer a US security umbrella over Europe, and they know they are next to be invaded unless they actually unite with Ukraine to defeat Russia. Everything we know - every single nonsensical action by the Biden administration to prevent Ukraine from defeating Russia is explained by the pre-invasion pact that outlined the rules of engagement. The amount of evidence is overwhelming. Occam's Razor. European action is happening 3 years late, but late is better than never, and miraculously Ukraine has not only survived, but now boasts the largest military in all of Europe. There is no longer US control over European security, and the Europeans will now finally assume responsibility for their own defense without having to adhere to the arbitrary red lines set out in the Biden-Putin pact. This is good for Ukraine, and this is good for Europe. The band-aid has been ripped off.
2:52

🧵 Why is Europe now suddenly and urgently preparing for war, 3 years late? March 16th, 2022 - the US continued to refuse to arm Ukraine as Russia approached Kyiv. The arbitrary redlines we all heard on why we can't help Ukraine were in fact made up - agreed to between Biden and Putin to ensure quick Ukrainian capitulation, in exchange for Russian promise to stop at Ukraine and not invade NATO countries. But Ukraine shockingly defeated Russia in the Battle for Kyiv without US military assistance. The calculus had to change and the US began to arm Ukraine within the agreed-upon red lines, such as no strikes against Russia. Not a single F-16 ever delivered. Seeing the US delay, trickle, and refuse to send arms to Ukraine was like pulling teeth. Now you know why. All the things you know were insane without a rational explanation. Now we have the explanation and the partisan hacks refuse to open their eyes. As the leader of NATO, the US forced Europeans to get in line, undoubtedly assuring them that Russia will stop at Ukraine, as was agreed with Putin. But Ukraine just would not capitulate, no matter how little military support the West sent to Ukraine. The US sent $15B worth of arms per year while Russia burned through $150B annually ($462 billion adjusted for purchasing power). Now that the Biden-Putin pact is dead with the new US administration, the Europeans are freaking out, because there is no longer a US security umbrella over Europe, and they know they are next to be invaded unless they actually unite with Ukraine to defeat Russia. Everything we know - every single nonsensical action by the Biden administration to prevent Ukraine from defeating Russia is explained by the pre-invasion pact that outlined the rules of engagement. The amount of evidence is overwhelming. Occam's Razor. European action is happening 3 years late, but late is better than never, and miraculously Ukraine has not only survived, but now boasts the largest military in all of Europe. There is no longer US control over European security, and the Europeans will now finally assume responsibility for their own defense without having to adhere to the arbitrary red lines set out in the Biden-Putin pact. This is good for Ukraine, and this is good for Europe. The band-aid has been ripped off.

Igor Sushko

85,931 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇺🇦 THE PEACE DEAL THAT COULD BREAK UKRAINE IN HALF A leaked 28 point plan is exploding across Washington and Kyiv, demanding that Ukraine surrender territory, potentially slash its military, give up long range weapons, accept neutrality, and ban all foreign troops. And Ukraine was not even allowed in the room when the deal was discussed. Pyotr Kurzin calls the plan a forced surrender. Mark Sleboda argues Ukraine is caught between great powers and no longer steering the war. The exchange gets intense immediately. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why the plan pushes Ukraine out of Donetsk, Luhansk and other key regions •⁠ ⁠How the US could shut off support if Kyiv refuses •⁠ ⁠Why Russia is taking major losses but still pushing forward •⁠ ⁠Why Trump’s shifting Ukraine policy is blowing up global calculations •⁠ ⁠How Europe is struggling to keep influence as the power map tilts •⁠ ⁠Why new corruption scandals inside Kyiv are detonating the inner circle •⁠ ⁠And why both sides warn the real outcome will be decided by economics, not territory Pressure is building on every front. The stakes are rising fast. And if this plan gains traction, it could reshape the balance of power in Europe overnight. 00:57 – Trump’s leaked 28-point peace plan surfaces 01:43 – Plan details: territory, demilitarization, neutrality 03:19 – Pyotr says the plan matches Russia’s maximalist demands 05:41 – Is accepting the deal outright capitulation for Ukraine 06:06 – Mark calls Kyiv a proxy regime dependent on US support 08:32 – Who is actually calling the shots in this war 08:46 – Pyotr says this is a US–Russia power struggle and Trump flips 11:00 – Does Ukraine have any real say in a peace agreement 12:34 – Mark says Trump has no coherent foreign policy 14:38 – Mark claims the US is firing ballistic missiles into Russia 17:20 – Problems with US security guarantees for a demilitarized Ukraine 17:36 – Pyotr says “you can’t square that circle,” calls it “ballocks” 18:16 – Ukraine’s manpower crisis as fighting-age men flee 19:50 – Debate over which side is more corrupt 21:14 – Pyotr bets 100 grand the peace deal won’t happen 21:33 – Mark says Ukraine’s choice is to throw men into the grinder 22:41 – Military importance of the battle for Pokrovsky 24:18 – Pyotr says the war is settled by economics, not cities 27:13 – Mark says Pokrovsky provides commanding heights 28:53 – Mark says Russian losses are low while Ukraine is hit by FABs 31:47 – Putin’s grip on power and purging of 23 generals 33:13 – Pyotr says Russia lost the Caucasus due to overstretch in Ukraine 35:36 – Pyotr argues sanctions are working and Russia is losing tech 37:33 – Mark says Russia decoupling from the West is beneficial 47:33 – Russian incursions into NATO territory and NATO’s response 52:16 – Pyotr says railway sabotage was a Russian hybrid attack 58:59 – Mark says the railway hit was a good false-flag operation
59:44

🚨🇺🇦 THE PEACE DEAL THAT COULD BREAK UKRAINE IN HALF A leaked 28 point plan is exploding across Washington and Kyiv, demanding that Ukraine surrender territory, potentially slash its military, give up long range weapons, accept neutrality, and ban all foreign troops. And Ukraine was not even allowed in the room when the deal was discussed. Pyotr Kurzin calls the plan a forced surrender. Mark Sleboda argues Ukraine is caught between great powers and no longer steering the war. The exchange gets intense immediately. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why the plan pushes Ukraine out of Donetsk, Luhansk and other key regions •⁠ ⁠How the US could shut off support if Kyiv refuses •⁠ ⁠Why Russia is taking major losses but still pushing forward •⁠ ⁠Why Trump’s shifting Ukraine policy is blowing up global calculations •⁠ ⁠How Europe is struggling to keep influence as the power map tilts •⁠ ⁠Why new corruption scandals inside Kyiv are detonating the inner circle •⁠ ⁠And why both sides warn the real outcome will be decided by economics, not territory Pressure is building on every front. The stakes are rising fast. And if this plan gains traction, it could reshape the balance of power in Europe overnight. 00:57 – Trump’s leaked 28-point peace plan surfaces 01:43 – Plan details: territory, demilitarization, neutrality 03:19 – Pyotr says the plan matches Russia’s maximalist demands 05:41 – Is accepting the deal outright capitulation for Ukraine 06:06 – Mark calls Kyiv a proxy regime dependent on US support 08:32 – Who is actually calling the shots in this war 08:46 – Pyotr says this is a US–Russia power struggle and Trump flips 11:00 – Does Ukraine have any real say in a peace agreement 12:34 – Mark says Trump has no coherent foreign policy 14:38 – Mark claims the US is firing ballistic missiles into Russia 17:20 – Problems with US security guarantees for a demilitarized Ukraine 17:36 – Pyotr says “you can’t square that circle,” calls it “ballocks” 18:16 – Ukraine’s manpower crisis as fighting-age men flee 19:50 – Debate over which side is more corrupt 21:14 – Pyotr bets 100 grand the peace deal won’t happen 21:33 – Mark says Ukraine’s choice is to throw men into the grinder 22:41 – Military importance of the battle for Pokrovsky 24:18 – Pyotr says the war is settled by economics, not cities 27:13 – Mark says Pokrovsky provides commanding heights 28:53 – Mark says Russian losses are low while Ukraine is hit by FABs 31:47 – Putin’s grip on power and purging of 23 generals 33:13 – Pyotr says Russia lost the Caucasus due to overstretch in Ukraine 35:36 – Pyotr argues sanctions are working and Russia is losing tech 37:33 – Mark says Russia decoupling from the West is beneficial 47:33 – Russian incursions into NATO territory and NATO’s response 52:16 – Pyotr says railway sabotage was a Russian hybrid attack 58:59 – Mark says the railway hit was a good false-flag operation

Mario Nawfal

968,929 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Dr. Dmitri Trenin: Russia🇷🇺 has the ADVANTAGE in negotiations with the US🇺🇸 to end Ukraine🇺🇦 proxy war ‘Putin’s special diplomatic operation aims at least at helping Mr. Trump distance himself and the United States as much as possible, as far as possible, from the war in Ukraine. And that would be no small achievement for Russia. Putin is certainly exploiting the advantages that Russia has at this moment. The Russian military is advancing… Russia is pounding the Ukrainian energy, industrial, military and transport infrastructure. And Russian bombardments are making things much more difficult for Ukraine. The Europeans are currently short of money to continue funding the Ukraine project. The United States has already said that it has stopped funding Ukraine. So this is a point in time Russia has a clear advantage. And I could throw into the lot the most recent scandal, although I think it was manufactured by the Trump administration, through this anti-corruption agency in Kiev where the FBI has an official representative.’ -Dr. Dmitri Trenin, Member of Russia’s Foreign and Defence Policy Council, on Washington-Moscow peace talks to end the proxy war FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
3:10

Dr. Dmitri Trenin: Russia🇷🇺 has the ADVANTAGE in negotiations with the US🇺🇸 to end Ukraine🇺🇦 proxy war ‘Putin’s special diplomatic operation aims at least at helping Mr. Trump distance himself and the United States as much as possible, as far as possible, from the war in Ukraine. And that would be no small achievement for Russia. Putin is certainly exploiting the advantages that Russia has at this moment. The Russian military is advancing… Russia is pounding the Ukrainian energy, industrial, military and transport infrastructure. And Russian bombardments are making things much more difficult for Ukraine. The Europeans are currently short of money to continue funding the Ukraine project. The United States has already said that it has stopped funding Ukraine. So this is a point in time Russia has a clear advantage. And I could throw into the lot the most recent scandal, although I think it was manufactured by the Trump administration, through this anti-corruption agency in Kiev where the FBI has an official representative.’ -Dr. Dmitri Trenin, Member of Russia’s Foreign and Defence Policy Council, on Washington-Moscow peace talks to end the proxy war FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

286,138 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS In 2001, Putin wanted Russia to join NATO. Putin asks Bush: "Why is NATO expanding eastward?" (June 2001) Putin: They lied to us 10 times in a row about not expanding NATO. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶The biggest threat in the world is NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake
1:53

NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS In 2001, Putin wanted Russia to join NATO. Putin asks Bush: "Why is NATO expanding eastward?" (June 2001) Putin: They lied to us 10 times in a row about not expanding NATO. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶The biggest threat in the world is NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

63,000 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS In 2001, Putin Wanted Russia to Join NATO. Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. Putin asks Bush: "Why is NATO expanding eastward?" (June 2001) Putin: They lied to us 10 times in a row about not expanding NATO. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶The biggest threat in the world is NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake - Kirill Dmitriev, Special Envoy of the President of Russia for Investment and Economic Cooperation ***Interview of Lara Logan
5:37

NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS In 2001, Putin Wanted Russia to Join NATO. Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. Putin asks Bush: "Why is NATO expanding eastward?" (June 2001) Putin: They lied to us 10 times in a row about not expanding NATO. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶The biggest threat in the world is NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake - Kirill Dmitriev, Special Envoy of the President of Russia for Investment and Economic Cooperation ***Interview of Lara Logan

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

69,651 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker (my two cents) below): I think the Russian threat sometimes is a little overstated. They have not had a lot of success. And to your point, Ukraine has actually taken back territory. To me, that points to a weakness in Russia, and as their economy continues to falter, I think their continuation of this war is going to be difficult. My input: Russia has not had a lot of success in Ukraine because Ukrainian Defenders make a tremendous effort, and the West supplies Ukraine with weapons. Yes, Ukraine has retaken our territories, but this is first and foremost a compliment to Ukrainian skill. Russia does not play by the rules, Putin knows that his power relies on Russia waging a war, and Russia does not care about its people. NATO has named Russia as its most significant threat, and Russia remains one.
0:39

US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker (my two cents) below): I think the Russian threat sometimes is a little overstated. They have not had a lot of success. And to your point, Ukraine has actually taken back territory. To me, that points to a weakness in Russia, and as their economy continues to falter, I think their continuation of this war is going to be difficult. My input: Russia has not had a lot of success in Ukraine because Ukrainian Defenders make a tremendous effort, and the West supplies Ukraine with weapons. Yes, Ukraine has retaken our territories, but this is first and foremost a compliment to Ukrainian skill. Russia does not play by the rules, Putin knows that his power relies on Russia waging a war, and Russia does not care about its people. NATO has named Russia as its most significant threat, and Russia remains one.

Anton Gerashchenko

85,158 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🇺🇦🇷🇺 WHY THE HELL WOULD RUSSIA ALLOW UKRAINE TO JOIN THE EU? The deepest irony in Trump’s plan just got exposed: Ukraine gets constitutionally barred from NATO forever, + NATO itself amends its rules to permanently exclude them. But then the plan explicitly says Ukraine is eligible for EU membership. Professor Serhii Plokhy (who’s forgotten more about this conflict than most “experts” ever knew) told the #1 Russian red line wasn’t actually NATO, it was Ukraine drifting into the EU economy and cutting Russia out of billions in trade. So Russia supposedly co-authors a peace plan… and hands Ukraine the one thing they feared most on a silver platter? Either someone on the U.S. side slipped that in as non-negotiable, or Russia’s priorities just got exposed as way more flexible than they’ve admitted for four years. And the U.S. is mediating talks between NATO (which it leads) and Russia? That line alone screams America First decoupling in real time. This plan is wilder the deeper you read it.
1:47

🇺🇦🇷🇺 WHY THE HELL WOULD RUSSIA ALLOW UKRAINE TO JOIN THE EU? The deepest irony in Trump’s plan just got exposed: Ukraine gets constitutionally barred from NATO forever, + NATO itself amends its rules to permanently exclude them. But then the plan explicitly says Ukraine is eligible for EU membership. Professor Serhii Plokhy (who’s forgotten more about this conflict than most “experts” ever knew) told the #1 Russian red line wasn’t actually NATO, it was Ukraine drifting into the EU economy and cutting Russia out of billions in trade. So Russia supposedly co-authors a peace plan… and hands Ukraine the one thing they feared most on a silver platter? Either someone on the U.S. side slipped that in as non-negotiable, or Russia’s priorities just got exposed as way more flexible than they’ve admitted for four years. And the U.S. is mediating talks between NATO (which it leads) and Russia? That line alone screams America First decoupling in real time. This plan is wilder the deeper you read it.

Mario Nawfal

348,025 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

⚡ U.S.: Russia is China’s proxy — and Beijing is paying for killings in Ukraine U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker has made the strongest statement against China since the start of the war — and this time, it's not about tariffs. 💥 “China believes it is waging a proxy war through Russia… They want us tied up in this conflict so we can’t focus on other threats. But that won’t happen. China must be held accountable for subsidizing the killings taking place on the battlefield in Ukraine.” For the first time, a U.S. official at this level has openly called Russia a de facto Chinese proxy, while directly accusing Beijing of funding the killing of Ukrainians.
0:27

⚡ U.S.: Russia is China’s proxy — and Beijing is paying for killings in Ukraine U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker has made the strongest statement against China since the start of the war — and this time, it's not about tariffs. 💥 “China believes it is waging a proxy war through Russia… They want us tied up in this conflict so we can’t focus on other threats. But that won’t happen. China must be held accountable for subsidizing the killings taking place on the battlefield in Ukraine.” For the first time, a U.S. official at this level has openly called Russia a de facto Chinese proxy, while directly accusing Beijing of funding the killing of Ukrainians.

NEXTA

170,903 просмотров • 1 год назад