Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Understanding what you see: Iranian ballistic-missiles targeting 🇮🇱 split in two upon re-entry into earth atmosphere ➡️ Video below shows how much less visible the actual 'warhead' is in that process Attention is primarily focused on the empty booster stage ➡️ Which is often falsely intercepted and declared as...

45,038 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Key statements by chief designer of Fire Point company Denys Shtilerman Denys Shtilierman on the Ukrainian FP-7 and FP-9 ballistic missiles: ▪️ The FP-7 ballistic missile will soon be tested against targets in Russia. ▪️ A clone of the S-300 missile has been developed for existing launchers. After integration with radar systems - a complex process - it could form the basis of an anti-ballistic shield under the Freya project. ▪️ The missiles are cheaper than the original S-300 due to simplification and the use of new manufacturing technologies. ▪️ The missile can also be used as a cheaper analogue of ATACMS. This is how the FP-7 missile with a range of up to 300 km, depending on the warhead, was developed. ▪️ The FP-7 warhead is expected to be larger than that of ATACMS, while the missile itself will cost 2.5 times less. ▪️ The developers say they are ready to produce as many FP-7 missiles as ordered. Unlike Flamingo, which currently faces engine production issues, FP-7 has no manufacturing bottlenecks. ▪️ Combat use of the FP-7 is expected to begin before summer. ▪️ The longer-range FP-9 ballistic missile is also intended, among other things, for strikes on Moscow - according to the developers, attacks on provincial targets do not impress Russia’s top leadership. ▪️ Tests of the FP-9 are expected to begin in early summer. The engine is currently being finalized. The missile’s range is up to 800 km. ▪️ FP-9 will be difficult to intercept: the speed of the Iskander-M is about 800 m/s, while FP-9 is expected to reach 1200 m/s. ▪️ The goal is for 25% of the missiles to penetrate Moscow’s air defenses and hit their targets. Cruise missiles and drones cannot reach targets in Moscow because they are intercepted. ▪️ Our luck is that in Russia the cost of missile production is inflated several times over because of theft.

Anton Gerashchenko

38,060 views • 4 months ago

Sejjil is the Message Today, Iran launched a Sejjil missile - its solid-fueled, medium-range ballistic system that has seen relatively few operational appearances since its initial test in 2008. Reports from Israeli and regional sources claim the missile was intercepted, but with no visual confirmation and media coverage tightly controlled by Israeli authorities, the actual outcome remains unclear. The Sejjil is a two-stage, road-mobile ballistic missile with an estimated range of 2,000 to 2,500 kilometers. Its use of solid fuel marks a significant operational advantage: shorter preparation time, faster launch capability, and greater survivability compared to liquid-fueled systems. This allows for more rapid deployment and less vulnerability to preemptive strikes, enhancing Iran’s ability to respond flexibly in a conflict scenario. While recent public focus has been on the Khorramshahr-class missiles, especially with the development of Khorramshahr-4 (Kheibar), the Sejjil offers a different set of advantages. Although it carries a lighter warhead, it is more launch-ready due to its solid propulsion. This makes it more suited for time-sensitive missions and rapid response strategies. Today’s reported launch reinforces the message that Iran is maintaining and gradually modernizing a diverse missile arsenal. The event also highlights the limits of open-source verification in environments where the flow of information is tightly managed. Whether or not the missile was successfully intercepted, the launch itself is a reminder of Iran’s continued emphasis on building operationally credible deterrent capabilities across its missile forces.

Zlatti71

24,790 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | ANI National Security Summit 2.0: DRDO Chairman Dr Samir V Kamat says, "For short-range ballistic missiles, the Pralay is now in the final stages of testing. With respect to hypersonic, we are working on two programs, the hypersonic glide missile and the hypersonic cruise missiles. The glide missile will come out first. We should be doing the first trials fairly soon. And that is at a more advanced stage than the cruise missile. The cruise missile program has not yet been sanctioned, although we are working on the various technologies which will get into the cruise missile..." "For short-range ballistic missiles, the Pralay is now in the final stages of testing and should be ready. Then we have some of our strategic missiles, which can be converted to tactical usage for the medium range and the long range. With respect to hypersonic, we are working on two programs, the hypersonic glide missile and the hypersonic cruise missiles. The hypersonic cruise missiles is one which has a scramjet engine and it is powered during its flight. The hypersonic glide missile is a missile which uses a booster to give it initial velocity, and then it just glides without any powering. The glide missile will come out first. We should be doing the first trials fairly soon. And that is at a more advanced stage than the cruise missile. The cruise missile program has not yet been sanctioned, although we are working on the various technologies which will get into the cruise missile. Recently, we have done a scramjet propulsion for more than 1,000 seconds. So that's been a major achievement, and once the program is sanctioned, we'll convert the scramjet propulsion into a working missile system. And I think that should take about five years after the sanction."

ANI

25,700 views • 2 months ago

Steve Reed is lying his way through another media round. “We have systems and defences in place that keep the United Kingdom safe” HMS Duncan is the only asset we currently have capable of intercepting a ballistic missile. It’s already committed to deploying with the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group on Operation Firecrest. We currently don’t have enough seaworthy Type 45s to fulfil our existing commitments, which includes the flagship role for the Standing NATO Maritime Group One, let alone defence of the UK mainland against hypothetical ballistic missile attack. “We will take necessary defensive action to protect British interests, British people or our allies across the region” No, we haven’t. We deployed HMS Dragon which has only just arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean. We haven’t intercepted a single missile and have intercepted a handful of the thousands of drone fired. Bahrain is one of our closest allies in the region. It has been repeatedly struck by missiles and drones for three weeks. There is no account of us having played any role in intercepting any of them, despite the C-SIPA agreement between us and the presence of the UK Naval Support Facility. “The UK has been taking down drones and missiles that have been fired around” We haven’t intercepted any missiles. The only capability that could is HMS Dragon, and that has been in transit. “Our assessment is that there was a missile launched at Diego Garcia, two I think….one failed and the other was intercepted, so that shows that our defensive capabilities are correct” An Iranian IRBM failing doesn’t show our defensive capabilities are correct; we got lucky. The other was intercepted, by a US-Navy SM-3 ballistic missile interceptor. Reed implies that this was by UK forces. Once again we were reliant upon the US. We appear entirely unwilling to hold Iran to account for attacking us. The Government is fudging its way through this conflict one indecisive step at a time, but gaslighting us into believing they’re in control of the situation is laughable.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

61,575 views • 4 months ago

This is probably the clearest & greatest example of why America needs more people manufacturing missiles. Iron Dome & David's Sling partially failed here in this video, but the much larger reason for the successful strikes are that the Iranians have a very advanced missile program. Some of the missiles have never been used in a real world combat situation before & that's what makes the Ukraine & Iran wars very unique. Intercepting missiles reliably is the hardest feat to accomplish in the defense realm. The difficult part though is you aren't normally dealing with just one warhead. You have to deal with sustained missile barrages which can be further complicated if they use cluster munitions in the warhead. 10 missile warheads can quickly turn into 10 large projectiles with 40 smaller projectiles. This impact these cluster munitions have on our radar systems is incredibly frustrating due to all the noise they produce. Top tier missile defense is a mix of the best math, physics and logistics. The best missile defense system in the world is worthless if it can't deploy enough interceptors to protect a civilian population. The warfare part here is also unique. The Iranians are using their land based missile program to inflict incredible damage against American, Israeli & Gulf nation targets. This tactic has been so successful it has forced America to use up a substantial portion of our interceptors & other munitions in the stockpile. This is why America must manufacture more weapons, missiles, rockets & munitions than we ever have before! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

EV_Trapper

81,163 views • 3 days ago