正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

UNLESS IT IS AGENDA MUST AGEND… PLEASE STOP THIS HYPOCRISY & SELECTIVE AMNESIA AFCON 2024 Nigeria 1-0 South Africa. Mchezaji wa SA alipigwa kiatu kwenye box, na that initiated a build up of a Victor Osimhen goal for Nigeria to make it 2-0 Ila VAR Iika review, na kufuta...

Wakazi's profile picture

Webiro Wakazi Wassira #TheLeader

255,071 subscribers

17,352 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Same rule. Afcon 2024, Nigeria conceded a penalty in 89th minute after Osimhen thought he had doubled the lead. Exact scenario, Egypt lucky for it not to have been a foul in the box. It’s easy to shout rigged, but this is the literal rule. Foul in build up invalidates a goal.
0:46

Same rule. Afcon 2024, Nigeria conceded a penalty in 89th minute after Osimhen thought he had doubled the lead. Exact scenario, Egypt lucky for it not to have been a foul in the box. It’s easy to shout rigged, but this is the literal rule. Foul in build up invalidates a goal.

Fola Olatunji-David

533,384 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mo Salah lost possession, and he initiated contact.. THAT WAS NOT A PENALTY!! As to Martinez, HE WAS FOULED ON THE BUILD UP to Egyptian goal! It was a foul (a bit soft but was a FOUL). Goals that come from build ups that have fouls, offsides, goalkeeper distractions, etc.. Do not count!! When you seen The VAR hasn’t called the referee to double-check, then it means they agree with the decision he made after making their review! So VAR can tell the Ref, when he clearly made mistakes (Corner/Freekick/Offside), or urge him to at it again. The team (Captain/Coach) can ask for review, when they do VAR does it while the Ref waits. Then when the VAR team doesn’t have an agreement then the Ref goes to Check! Now with all the Referee Team & Tech, human errors have still been made as well as emotional decisions. But I do not agree that errors made have been deliberately done to clear Path for Argentina to thrive HAPANA
0:26

Mo Salah lost possession, and he initiated contact.. THAT WAS NOT A PENALTY!! As to Martinez, HE WAS FOULED ON THE BUILD UP to Egyptian goal! It was a foul (a bit soft but was a FOUL). Goals that come from build ups that have fouls, offsides, goalkeeper distractions, etc.. Do not count!! When you seen The VAR hasn’t called the referee to double-check, then it means they agree with the decision he made after making their review! So VAR can tell the Ref, when he clearly made mistakes (Corner/Freekick/Offside), or urge him to at it again. The team (Captain/Coach) can ask for review, when they do VAR does it while the Ref waits. Then when the VAR team doesn’t have an agreement then the Ref goes to Check! Now with all the Referee Team & Tech, human errors have still been made as well as emotional decisions. But I do not agree that errors made have been deliberately done to clear Path for Argentina to thrive HAPANA

Webiro Wakazi Wassira #TheLeader

18,707 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mind you Salah was fouled in the build up to Argentina third goal and Egypt was supposed to be given a penalty instead. VAR checked it and still went ahead to give the goal. This is the worst World Cup ever.
0:24

Mind you Salah was fouled in the build up to Argentina third goal and Egypt was supposed to be given a penalty instead. VAR checked it and still went ahead to give the goal. This is the worst World Cup ever.

Nuel

2,575,412 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇦🇷🇪🇬 Everyone wanted to scream that Argentina vs Egypt was rigged. Then the replay made it annoying. Egypt’s first controversy came when the refs missed a foul, Egypt went coast to coast, scored, and appeared to go up 2-0. But VAR stepped in, reviewed the buildup, and ruled no goal. As much as people wanted to lose their minds, the foul was there. And under VAR, if an offense leads into the buildup of a goal, exactly what happened on that play, they can review it and take the goal away. Then came the extra detail nobody wants to hear: The Egyptian player also appeared to remove his shirt, which is supposed to be a yellow card. Fast-forward to the 97th minute. Salah goes down for Egypt, Argentina go coast to coast, score, and take the lead. But when the play is slowed down, the defender touches the ball first. It becomes a loose ball, then the player gets tripped up. So yes, everyone wanted the “rigged” version. The problem is the refs may have actually gotten both calls right. Source: Mike Daddino on YT / Writer Sol
1:32

🇦🇷🇪🇬 Everyone wanted to scream that Argentina vs Egypt was rigged. Then the replay made it annoying. Egypt’s first controversy came when the refs missed a foul, Egypt went coast to coast, scored, and appeared to go up 2-0. But VAR stepped in, reviewed the buildup, and ruled no goal. As much as people wanted to lose their minds, the foul was there. And under VAR, if an offense leads into the buildup of a goal, exactly what happened on that play, they can review it and take the goal away. Then came the extra detail nobody wants to hear: The Egyptian player also appeared to remove his shirt, which is supposed to be a yellow card. Fast-forward to the 97th minute. Salah goes down for Egypt, Argentina go coast to coast, score, and take the lead. But when the play is slowed down, the defender touches the ball first. It becomes a loose ball, then the player gets tripped up. So yes, everyone wanted the “rigged” version. The problem is the refs may have actually gotten both calls right. Source: Mike Daddino on YT / Writer Sol

Mario Nawfal

2,549,198 次观看 • 1 个月前

To have 4 goals that look this good in 1 game is exciting. A truly international tournament, this was in our match vs the Champions of El Salvador. Goal 1 - Parker off the corner Goal 2 - Thiago on the volley Goal 3 - Isabella on the weak foot Goal 4 - Colin with a banger The vibe was crazy. The teams and parents from South America, Central America, and Mexico really bring the energy. We didn't win it all this year, but it was definitely one of my more fun years at Copa Rayados
1:01

To have 4 goals that look this good in 1 game is exciting. A truly international tournament, this was in our match vs the Champions of El Salvador. Goal 1 - Parker off the corner Goal 2 - Thiago on the volley Goal 3 - Isabella on the weak foot Goal 4 - Colin with a banger The vibe was crazy. The teams and parents from South America, Central America, and Mexico really bring the energy. We didn't win it all this year, but it was definitely one of my more fun years at Copa Rayados

Michael Carroll 🇺🇸

11,848 次观看 • 2 年前

SNEAKO says Lionel Messi is the "Netanyahu of football" after Egypt was denied multiple VAR reviews and foul calls, and after an Egypt goal was overturned following a VAR review, resulting in Argentina eliminating Egypt from the FIFA World Cup. 😳 "He's a wall kisser. They rig it for him. It's unjust and unfair. He's not deserving of that top spot. Messi is the Netanyahu of football. Ronaldo is still the GOAT."
0:29

SNEAKO says Lionel Messi is the "Netanyahu of football" after Egypt was denied multiple VAR reviews and foul calls, and after an Egypt goal was overturned following a VAR review, resulting in Argentina eliminating Egypt from the FIFA World Cup. 😳 "He's a wall kisser. They rig it for him. It's unjust and unfair. He's not deserving of that top spot. Messi is the Netanyahu of football. Ronaldo is still the GOAT."

Daily SNEAKO

37,102 次观看 • 1 个月前

"That would be more so the culture" You get the piss taken out of you for fisting over the bar when a goal is on in St Brigids. You love to hear it - a few intercounty teams could take note
0:44

"That would be more so the culture" You get the piss taken out of you for fisting over the bar when a goal is on in St Brigids. You love to hear it - a few intercounty teams could take note

Smaller Fish

22,431 次观看 • 6 个月前

HER TAKE ON DEMOCRATS STAYING IN EL SALVADOR. 💥WHY IN THE HELL IS THIS SH💩T TOLERATED WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICIANS? YOU ARE PAID TO DO A JOB IN THE U.S. IF YOUR A$$ IS NOT IN THAT SEAT (WHEN IT IS REQUIRED TO BE )TO REVIEW LEGISLATION AND VOTE ON ISSUES FOR THE AMERICANS THAT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE REPRESENTING; THEN YOU ARE FIRED.
0:58

HER TAKE ON DEMOCRATS STAYING IN EL SALVADOR. 💥WHY IN THE HELL IS THIS SH💩T TOLERATED WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICIANS? YOU ARE PAID TO DO A JOB IN THE U.S. IF YOUR A$$ IS NOT IN THAT SEAT (WHEN IT IS REQUIRED TO BE )TO REVIEW LEGISLATION AND VOTE ON ISSUES FOR THE AMERICANS THAT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE REPRESENTING; THEN YOU ARE FIRED.

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

130,058 次观看 • 1 年前

Will Ferrell says his favorite review of Step Brothers came from Roger Ebert who called it “the end of Western civilization.” Ebert went further and urged readers not to buy it on DVD. Not to support movies like it. Will Ferrell: …”It’s like, the our most favorite review of Step Brothers was Roger Ebert… …who said, “This is the end of Western civilization.” Will Ferrell: And he went as far as to say, “Do not buy this on DVD when it comes out. Do not support movies like this, because it will, it will make other people think they should make movies similar to this.” “So, please…” It was a it was like a call to action. (Mimics Ebert) “McAdams… McKay and Ferrell… Ahhh… That is so delicious.” Only because we had gotten enough filled up on the love side, that we could handle it.”
0:38

Will Ferrell says his favorite review of Step Brothers came from Roger Ebert who called it “the end of Western civilization.” Ebert went further and urged readers not to buy it on DVD. Not to support movies like it. Will Ferrell: …”It’s like, the our most favorite review of Step Brothers was Roger Ebert… …who said, “This is the end of Western civilization.” Will Ferrell: And he went as far as to say, “Do not buy this on DVD when it comes out. Do not support movies like this, because it will, it will make other people think they should make movies similar to this.” “So, please…” It was a it was like a call to action. (Mimics Ebert) “McAdams… McKay and Ferrell… Ahhh… That is so delicious.” Only because we had gotten enough filled up on the love side, that we could handle it.”

_Chase😈

371,606 次观看 • 24 天前

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."
1:12

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 次观看 • 6 个月前

You have a big goal. You think about it often. But if someone asked you how today's to-do list moves you closer to it, you'd struggle to answer. The solution is a goal stack. A goal stack is a reverse-engineered chain that connects a distant ambition to what you do today. Each layer feeds the one above it: Layer 1: High Hard Goal (1-5 years). An ambitious target that pushes you past your comfort zone. Layer 2: Break it down into annual targets, quarterly milestones, monthly objectives, and weekly tasks. Each level builds on the previous one, creating a logical progression toward the High Hard Goal. Layer 3: Daily Goal-Directed Actions. The single most important task you can do today, the one domino that triggers a chain reaction toward your High Hard Goal. At the end of each workday, take 10 minutes to plan tomorrow. Identify three goal-directed actions. Set wildly specific micro-goals for each. Then take the first step of the first step before you stop for the night. Open the document. Title it. Save it in the right folder. When you do this, your daily actions connect upward through the stack to the thing you actually care about. More on this in the article below: - Rian
2:41

You have a big goal. You think about it often. But if someone asked you how today's to-do list moves you closer to it, you'd struggle to answer. The solution is a goal stack. A goal stack is a reverse-engineered chain that connects a distant ambition to what you do today. Each layer feeds the one above it: Layer 1: High Hard Goal (1-5 years). An ambitious target that pushes you past your comfort zone. Layer 2: Break it down into annual targets, quarterly milestones, monthly objectives, and weekly tasks. Each level builds on the previous one, creating a logical progression toward the High Hard Goal. Layer 3: Daily Goal-Directed Actions. The single most important task you can do today, the one domino that triggers a chain reaction toward your High Hard Goal. At the end of each workday, take 10 minutes to plan tomorrow. Identify three goal-directed actions. Set wildly specific micro-goals for each. Then take the first step of the first step before you stop for the night. Open the document. Title it. Save it in the right folder. When you do this, your daily actions connect upward through the stack to the thing you actually care about. More on this in the article below: - Rian

Rian Doris

46,001 次观看 • 4 个月前

#TeamMelli #IRAN #Egypt Ok the IRAN goal was offside because of THE RULE. We get it So can someone tell me WHY the VAR didn’t also look at this ? The Iranian player (#6) is SAEID EZATOLLAHI If we agree Iran was NOT robbed on the offside … then can we at least ASK why the entire mayhem in the box wasn’t fully reviewed ? VAR’s job is clear. Review each goal, red card and penalty decision. Not just what happened at the end of the action. Nope It’s to Review the ENTIRE SEQUENCE . The entire BUILD UP. That’s why some goals are disallowed for a foul that occurred near the middle of the pitch in THE BUILD UP. See for yourself and judge. And let us know your opinion. 🚨 :: this was originally posted by Egyptian fan @ibrahemerfaay4 who tagged me. He was pointing out how Ezatollahi handled the ball … but he conveniently never mentioned how his team’s goalie fouled Ezatollahi. Good luck to Egypt. But we should be in the playoffs with them
1:57

#TeamMelli #IRAN #Egypt Ok the IRAN goal was offside because of THE RULE. We get it So can someone tell me WHY the VAR didn’t also look at this ? The Iranian player (#6) is SAEID EZATOLLAHI If we agree Iran was NOT robbed on the offside … then can we at least ASK why the entire mayhem in the box wasn’t fully reviewed ? VAR’s job is clear. Review each goal, red card and penalty decision. Not just what happened at the end of the action. Nope It’s to Review the ENTIRE SEQUENCE . The entire BUILD UP. That’s why some goals are disallowed for a foul that occurred near the middle of the pitch in THE BUILD UP. See for yourself and judge. And let us know your opinion. 🚨 :: this was originally posted by Egyptian fan @ibrahemerfaay4 who tagged me. He was pointing out how Ezatollahi handled the ball … but he conveniently never mentioned how his team’s goalie fouled Ezatollahi. Good luck to Egypt. But we should be in the playoffs with them

Junior Rodigan

77,243 次观看 • 1 个月前

While u may not like the rule, maybe this will finally convince you that when a defender isn't in legal guarding position, and his foot causes the dribbler to fall, it is simply a foul on the defender... no matter how much it sucks for Horford, it's always a foul
0:20

While u may not like the rule, maybe this will finally convince you that when a defender isn't in legal guarding position, and his foot causes the dribbler to fall, it is simply a foul on the defender... no matter how much it sucks for Horford, it's always a foul

BBALLBREAKDOWN

915,930 次观看 • 1 年前

Morning all, it was on this day in 1982 that Celtic defeated Ajax 2-1 in Amsterdam to knock them out of the European Cup on a 4-3 aggregate. No way that Ajax player meant that goal as a shot. :-)
1:43

Morning all, it was on this day in 1982 that Celtic defeated Ajax 2-1 in Amsterdam to knock them out of the European Cup on a 4-3 aggregate. No way that Ajax player meant that goal as a shot. :-)

Lisbon Lion

16,060 次观看 • 10 个月前

🧵31/34 Orthogonality Thesis --- Now if you ask: why would something so clever want something so stupid, that would lead to death or hell for its creator? you are missing the basics of the orthogonality thesis! Any goal can be combined with any level of intelligence, the 2 concepts are orthogonal to each-other. Intelligence is about capability, it is the power to predict accurately future states and what outcomes will result from what actions. It says nothing about values, about what results to seek, what to desire. 40,000 death recipies --- An intelligent AI originally designed to discover medical drugs can generate molecules for chemical weapons with just a flip of a switch in its parameters. Its intelligence can be used for either outcome, the decision is just a free variable, completely decoupled from its ability to do one or the other. You wouldn’t call the AI that instantly produced 40,000 novel recipes for deadly neuro-toxins stupid. Stupid Actions --- Taken on their own, there is no such thing as stupid goals or stupid desires. You could call a person stupid if the actions she decides to take fail to satisfy a desire, but not the desire itself. Stupid Goals --- You COULD actually also call a goal stupid, but to do that you need to look at its causal chain. Does the goal lead to failure or success of its parent instrumental goal? If it leads to failure, you could call a goal stupid, but if it leads to success, you can not. You could judge instrumental goals relative to each-other, but when you reach the end of the chain, such adjectives don’t even make sense for terminal goals. The deepest desires can never be stupid or clever. Deep Terminal Goals --- For example, adult humans may seek pleasure from sexual relations, even if they don’t want to give birth to children. To an alien, this behaviour may seem irrational or even stupid. But, is this desire stupid? Is the goal to have sexual intercourse, without the goal for reproduction a stupid one or a clever one? No, it’s neither. The most intelligent person on earth and the most stupid person on earth can have that same desire. These concepts are orthogonal to each-other. March of Nines --- We could program an AGI with the terminal goal to count the number of planets in the observable universe with very high precision. If the AI comes up with a plan that achieves that goal with 99.9999… twenty nines % probability of success, but causes human extinction in the process, it’s meaningless to call the act of killing humans stupid, because its plan simply worked! It had maximum effectiveness at reaching its terminal goal and killing the humans was a side-effect of just one of the maximum effective steps in that plan. One less 9 --- If you put biased human interests aside, it should be obvious that a plan with one less 9 that did not cause extinction, would be stupid compared to this one, from the perspective of the problem solver optimiser AGI. So, it should be clear now: The instrumental goals AGI arrives to via its optimisation calculations, or the things it desires, are not clever or stupid on their own. Profile of Super-Intelligence --- The thing that gives the “super-intelligent” adjective to the AGI is that it is: “SUPER-EFFECTIVE”. • The goals it chooses are “super-optimal” at ultimately leading to its terminal goals • It is super-effective at completing its goals • and its plans have “super-extreme” levels of probability for success. It has Nothing to do with how super-weird and super-insane its goals may seem to humans! Calculating Pi accurately --- Now, going back to thinking of instrumental goals that would lead to extinction, the -142C temperature goal is still very unimaginative. The AGI might at some point arrive to the goal of calculating pi to a precision of 10 to the power of 100 trillion digits and that instrumental goal might lead to the instrumental goal of making use of all the molecules on earth to build transistors to do it, like turn earth into a supercomputer. By default, with super-optimisers things will get super-weird!!
5:48

🧵31/34 Orthogonality Thesis --- Now if you ask: why would something so clever want something so stupid, that would lead to death or hell for its creator? you are missing the basics of the orthogonality thesis! Any goal can be combined with any level of intelligence, the 2 concepts are orthogonal to each-other. Intelligence is about capability, it is the power to predict accurately future states and what outcomes will result from what actions. It says nothing about values, about what results to seek, what to desire. 40,000 death recipies --- An intelligent AI originally designed to discover medical drugs can generate molecules for chemical weapons with just a flip of a switch in its parameters. Its intelligence can be used for either outcome, the decision is just a free variable, completely decoupled from its ability to do one or the other. You wouldn’t call the AI that instantly produced 40,000 novel recipes for deadly neuro-toxins stupid. Stupid Actions --- Taken on their own, there is no such thing as stupid goals or stupid desires. You could call a person stupid if the actions she decides to take fail to satisfy a desire, but not the desire itself. Stupid Goals --- You COULD actually also call a goal stupid, but to do that you need to look at its causal chain. Does the goal lead to failure or success of its parent instrumental goal? If it leads to failure, you could call a goal stupid, but if it leads to success, you can not. You could judge instrumental goals relative to each-other, but when you reach the end of the chain, such adjectives don’t even make sense for terminal goals. The deepest desires can never be stupid or clever. Deep Terminal Goals --- For example, adult humans may seek pleasure from sexual relations, even if they don’t want to give birth to children. To an alien, this behaviour may seem irrational or even stupid. But, is this desire stupid? Is the goal to have sexual intercourse, without the goal for reproduction a stupid one or a clever one? No, it’s neither. The most intelligent person on earth and the most stupid person on earth can have that same desire. These concepts are orthogonal to each-other. March of Nines --- We could program an AGI with the terminal goal to count the number of planets in the observable universe with very high precision. If the AI comes up with a plan that achieves that goal with 99.9999… twenty nines % probability of success, but causes human extinction in the process, it’s meaningless to call the act of killing humans stupid, because its plan simply worked! It had maximum effectiveness at reaching its terminal goal and killing the humans was a side-effect of just one of the maximum effective steps in that plan. One less 9 --- If you put biased human interests aside, it should be obvious that a plan with one less 9 that did not cause extinction, would be stupid compared to this one, from the perspective of the problem solver optimiser AGI. So, it should be clear now: The instrumental goals AGI arrives to via its optimisation calculations, or the things it desires, are not clever or stupid on their own. Profile of Super-Intelligence --- The thing that gives the “super-intelligent” adjective to the AGI is that it is: “SUPER-EFFECTIVE”. • The goals it chooses are “super-optimal” at ultimately leading to its terminal goals • It is super-effective at completing its goals • and its plans have “super-extreme” levels of probability for success. It has Nothing to do with how super-weird and super-insane its goals may seem to humans! Calculating Pi accurately --- Now, going back to thinking of instrumental goals that would lead to extinction, the -142C temperature goal is still very unimaginative. The AGI might at some point arrive to the goal of calculating pi to a precision of 10 to the power of 100 trillion digits and that instrumental goal might lead to the instrumental goal of making use of all the molecules on earth to build transistors to do it, like turn earth into a supercomputer. By default, with super-optimisers things will get super-weird!!

Lethal Intelligence

1,859,374 次观看 • 1 年前

ZANUPF has done many terrible things, but it is important to acknowledge that there are certain good things it did too. One of them was allowing Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) to operate from Zimbabwe, pass through Zimbabwe, and even use the Zimbabwe National Army to move its weapons from Zambia to South Africa. I know you are basing your statement on a short video clip which occasionally circulates online, showing Robert Mugabe being interviewed by British television. In that interview, he was asked if he would allow South Africans to fight militarily from Zimbabwe, and he replied that South Africans would fight militarily in South Africa not Zimbabwe. Anyone with a bit of common sense would understand that Mugabe could never have gone on British television and publicly said that Zimbabwe was helping South Africans militarily to fight apartheid from Zimbabwean soil. It is like expecting O. R. Tambo to go on British or American television and expose the tactics used to fight the apartheid regime. That would not have been a smart thing to do. It simply requires a bit of emotional intelligence to understand that when watching that video clip. If you are not aware of the history, read about the number of bombings that took place in Zimbabwe — bombings carried out by the apartheid South African regime in retaliation for Zimbabwe’s support of the liberation struggle in South Africa. Even your own former president Thabo Mbeki spoke about how Zimbabwe helped South Africa militarily during that period. That said, this is not an excuse to justify illegal immigration simply because Zimbabwe helped South Africa during the struggle. Zimbabwe did the right thing at the time. I am one of those who have consistently said that I am opposed to illegal immigration because it is a crime. However, that does not give anyone the right to insult or abuse Africans particularly Zimbabweans who are living legally in South Africa and have committed no crime. There are South Africans living in Zimbabwe too. One of the biggest mining companies in Zimbabwe, Zimplats, is South African-owned through Impala Platinum Holdings Limited. The bulk of Impala Platinum Holdings Limited’s earnings and revenue come from Zimbabwe not South Africa. Those are the taxes that pay grants to South Africans, it takes a bit of reading to understanding the interconnectedness. It is therefore foolish to say you don’t want Zimbabweans who are living legally in South Africa to do so. It is crazy! There are many other South African companies operating in Zimbabwe, and even your former vice-president, DD, owns a mine in Zvishavane. It is healthy for South Africans to have conversations about issues affecting their country. It is also healthy to discuss illegal immigration — that is part of responsible citizenship. But when you start going after people like Peter Ndoro, who are in South Africa legally, and others who are even naturalised South Africans, it becomes clear that the issue is no longer about immigration. It is about targeting Africans — it is Afrophobia. There are many white Zimbabweans living in South Africa, some legally and some illegally, yet I have never heard anyone mention them. Instead, the focus is always on black Africans who are in South Africa legally and contributing to society. That is not about protecting borders or enforcing immigration laws — that is about self-hate, the internalised racism that drives some Africans to turn on their fellow Africans.
9:56

ZANUPF has done many terrible things, but it is important to acknowledge that there are certain good things it did too. One of them was allowing Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) to operate from Zimbabwe, pass through Zimbabwe, and even use the Zimbabwe National Army to move its weapons from Zambia to South Africa. I know you are basing your statement on a short video clip which occasionally circulates online, showing Robert Mugabe being interviewed by British television. In that interview, he was asked if he would allow South Africans to fight militarily from Zimbabwe, and he replied that South Africans would fight militarily in South Africa not Zimbabwe. Anyone with a bit of common sense would understand that Mugabe could never have gone on British television and publicly said that Zimbabwe was helping South Africans militarily to fight apartheid from Zimbabwean soil. It is like expecting O. R. Tambo to go on British or American television and expose the tactics used to fight the apartheid regime. That would not have been a smart thing to do. It simply requires a bit of emotional intelligence to understand that when watching that video clip. If you are not aware of the history, read about the number of bombings that took place in Zimbabwe — bombings carried out by the apartheid South African regime in retaliation for Zimbabwe’s support of the liberation struggle in South Africa. Even your own former president Thabo Mbeki spoke about how Zimbabwe helped South Africa militarily during that period. That said, this is not an excuse to justify illegal immigration simply because Zimbabwe helped South Africa during the struggle. Zimbabwe did the right thing at the time. I am one of those who have consistently said that I am opposed to illegal immigration because it is a crime. However, that does not give anyone the right to insult or abuse Africans particularly Zimbabweans who are living legally in South Africa and have committed no crime. There are South Africans living in Zimbabwe too. One of the biggest mining companies in Zimbabwe, Zimplats, is South African-owned through Impala Platinum Holdings Limited. The bulk of Impala Platinum Holdings Limited’s earnings and revenue come from Zimbabwe not South Africa. Those are the taxes that pay grants to South Africans, it takes a bit of reading to understanding the interconnectedness. It is therefore foolish to say you don’t want Zimbabweans who are living legally in South Africa to do so. It is crazy! There are many other South African companies operating in Zimbabwe, and even your former vice-president, DD, owns a mine in Zvishavane. It is healthy for South Africans to have conversations about issues affecting their country. It is also healthy to discuss illegal immigration — that is part of responsible citizenship. But when you start going after people like Peter Ndoro, who are in South Africa legally, and others who are even naturalised South Africans, it becomes clear that the issue is no longer about immigration. It is about targeting Africans — it is Afrophobia. There are many white Zimbabweans living in South Africa, some legally and some illegally, yet I have never heard anyone mention them. Instead, the focus is always on black Africans who are in South Africa legally and contributing to society. That is not about protecting borders or enforcing immigration laws — that is about self-hate, the internalised racism that drives some Africans to turn on their fellow Africans.

Hopewell Chin’ono

181,631 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 MAKE IT HAPPEN: Stephen Miller stated it plainly: the Democrats MUST lose in the midterms, there is NO other way. Show up to vote on August 18th to make SURE that South Florida is FREE of liberal LUNATICS.
0:48

🚨 MAKE IT HAPPEN: Stephen Miller stated it plainly: the Democrats MUST lose in the midterms, there is NO other way. Show up to vote on August 18th to make SURE that South Florida is FREE of liberal LUNATICS.

Michael Carbonara

69,638 次观看 • 12 天前

Listen carefully. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Transport responded yesterday to the SCA by stating that when Parliament reviews a law, it does not do so with the aim of excluding foreigners. More importantly, he pointed out that you critics don't attend public hearings, because when the clause that allows undocumented immigrants to claim was removed, most of those who did participate wanted it reinstated. Once again, South Africa is not a lawless country. Take part in the proper processes and stop this foolishness.
2:46

Listen carefully. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Transport responded yesterday to the SCA by stating that when Parliament reviews a law, it does not do so with the aim of excluding foreigners. More importantly, he pointed out that you critics don't attend public hearings, because when the clause that allows undocumented immigrants to claim was removed, most of those who did participate wanted it reinstated. Once again, South Africa is not a lawless country. Take part in the proper processes and stop this foolishness.

Sixolise Gcilishe

10,563 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jamal Murray on playing with joy: "It's just knowing what the goal is. That's what makes it the most fun. There are a lot of teams in the NBA that don't have that chance...it's a lot of fun. Just trying to make the most of it.” Full presser 👇
6:48

Jamal Murray on playing with joy: "It's just knowing what the goal is. That's what makes it the most fun. There are a lot of teams in the NBA that don't have that chance...it's a lot of fun. Just trying to make the most of it.” Full presser 👇

DNVR Nuggets

17,193 次观看 • 9 个月前

VP VANCE: There are “a number of things that make it clear that [Iran] are interested in acquiring a nuclear weapon" and “everything is on the table” to stop them from getting one... Our goal is to make sure that doesn't happen.
0:31

VP VANCE: There are “a number of things that make it clear that [Iran] are interested in acquiring a nuclear weapon" and “everything is on the table” to stop them from getting one... Our goal is to make sure that doesn't happen.

Open Source Intel

27,995 次观看 • 5 个月前