正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
While u may not like the rule, maybe this will finally convince you that when a defender isn't in legal guarding position, and his foot causes the dribbler to fall, it is simply a foul on the defender... no matter how much it sucks for Horford, it's always a foul
915,908 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)
11 条评论

Horford is in legal guarding position tho

Trusted by 90% of the NBA, Noah Basketball uses the most advanced technology to measure the key elements of the perfect shot, providing real-time data with instant, audio feedback showing players exactly what they need to do to improve their shooting percentages.

Imagine thinking that’s not legal guarding position lol

So barely touching someone, that should be incidental contact, is now a foul? Good job

Foot to foot contact that leads to the dribbler falling can't be considered incidental if the defender isn't in legal guarding position

What the fuck are you on about

If you want an explanation of what the rules are and how they work, I'm here for you.

You don’t think he turned his ankle (non contact) and fell?

Not a foul

Not only is it a foul, it was reviewed by the refs and they upheld this obvious foul call. Foot to foot contact that causes the ball handler to fall is a foul, so long as the defender is not in legal guarding position.. which he clearly is not

It’s dumb, but I get it



