正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

While u may not like the rule, maybe this will finally convince you that when a defender isn't in legal guarding position, and his foot causes the dribbler to fall, it is simply a foul on the defender... no matter how much it sucks for Horford, it's always a foul

915,908 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

IM OK TOO 的头像
IM OK TOO1 年前

Horford is in legal guarding position tho

Noah Basketball 的头像
Noah Basketball2 年前

Trusted by 90% of the NBA, Noah Basketball uses the most advanced technology to measure the key elements of the perfect shot, providing real-time data with instant, audio feedback showing players exactly what they need to do to improve their shooting percentages.

J Suave 的头像
J Suave1 年前

Imagine thinking that’s not legal guarding position lol

Assist Machine 的头像
Assist Machine1 年前

So barely touching someone, that should be incidental contact, is now a foul? Good job

BBALLBREAKDOWN 的头像
BBALLBREAKDOWN1 年前

Foot to foot contact that leads to the dribbler falling can't be considered incidental if the defender isn't in legal guarding position

clarke3110 的头像
clarke31101 年前

What the fuck are you on about

BBALLBREAKDOWN 的头像
BBALLBREAKDOWN1 年前

If you want an explanation of what the rules are and how they work, I'm here for you.

HoopTalkTV 的头像
HoopTalkTV1 年前

You don’t think he turned his ankle (non contact) and fell?

db 的头像
db1 年前

Not a foul

BBALLBREAKDOWN 的头像
BBALLBREAKDOWN1 年前

Not only is it a foul, it was reviewed by the refs and they upheld this obvious foul call. Foot to foot contact that causes the ball handler to fall is a foul, so long as the defender is not in legal guarding position.. which he clearly is not

drphill99 的头像
drphill991 年前

It’s dumb, but I get it

相关视频