正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

UPDATE: Buganda Road Chief Magistrate Ritah Kidasa Neumbe has dismissed two applications by lawyer and activist Male Mabirizi Kiwanuka seeking her recusal from his criminal trial. The magistrate ruled that the allegations raised against her were speculative, unsupported by evidence, and did not establish judicial bias. Mabirizi is facing... show more

Daily Monitor

2,110,057 subscribers

121,406 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

WATCH: Buganda Road Chief Magistrate Court has rejected an interim bail application by maverick lawyer Male Mabirizi Kiwanuka, who is on remand over TikTok posts targeting Chief Justice Flavian Zeija and Court of Appeal Justice Musa Ssekaana. The ruling gives the State time to verify the proposed sureties. Magistrate Ritah Neube Kidasa said it would be “illogical” to release an accused before assessing the suitability of the sureties, emphasising that while an accused has a constitutional right to apply for bail, the prosecution’s response must also be considered. Mabirizi, currently on remand at Luzira Prison, is charged under the Computer Misuse Act and has been further remanded until March 27, 2026. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

WATCH: Buganda Road Chief Magistrate Court has rejected an interim bail application by maverick lawyer Male Mabirizi Kiwanuka, who is on remand over TikTok posts targeting Chief Justice Flavian Zeija and Court of Appeal Justice Musa Ssekaana. The ruling gives the State time to verify the proposed sureties. Magistrate Ritah Neube Kidasa said it would be “illogical” to release an accused before assessing the suitability of the sureties, emphasising that while an accused has a constitutional right to apply for bail, the prosecution’s response must also be considered. Mabirizi, currently on remand at Luzira Prison, is charged under the Computer Misuse Act and has been further remanded until March 27, 2026. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

26,289 次观看 • 6 个月前

UPDATE: The State has withdrawn earlier Computer Misuse charges against lawyer Male Mabirizi, which had accused him of spreading malicious information and promoting hate speech, and instead filed fresh charges. Mabirizi now faces charges of broadcasting without a license and publishing false information about Chief Justice Flavian Zeija. He declined to take plea on the new charges and requested the recusal of Chief Magistrate Ritah Neumbe Kidasa at Buganda Road Court. He has been remanded to Luzira Prison until April 15, 2026. See related story: #MonitorUpdates 📹: Lubowa Abubaker

UPDATE: The State has withdrawn earlier Computer Misuse charges against lawyer Male Mabirizi, which had accused him of spreading malicious information and promoting hate speech, and instead filed fresh charges. Mabirizi now faces charges of broadcasting without a license and publishing false information about Chief Justice Flavian Zeija. He declined to take plea on the new charges and requested the recusal of Chief Magistrate Ritah Neumbe Kidasa at Buganda Road Court. He has been remanded to Luzira Prison until April 15, 2026. See related story: #MonitorUpdates 📹: Lubowa Abubaker

Daily Monitor

52,292 次观看 • 5 个月前

WATCH: Maverick lawyer Male Mabirizi has been charged and remanded to Luzira Prison on four counts under the Computer Misuse Act, over alleged social media posts (TikTok) targeting the Chief Justice and a Justice of the Court of Appeal. According to the charge sheet, Mabirizi faces two counts of malicious information and two counts of hate speech, contrary to Sections 28 and 26 of the Computer Misuse Act. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

WATCH: Maverick lawyer Male Mabirizi has been charged and remanded to Luzira Prison on four counts under the Computer Misuse Act, over alleged social media posts (TikTok) targeting the Chief Justice and a Justice of the Court of Appeal. According to the charge sheet, Mabirizi faces two counts of malicious information and two counts of hate speech, contrary to Sections 28 and 26 of the Computer Misuse Act. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

58,410 次观看 • 7 个月前

WATCH: The Director of Public Prosecutions has withdrawn four charges under the Computer Misuse Act against lawyer Male Mabirizi, following a Constitutional Court ruling that nullified the law. However, the court has instituted three new charges against him, including publishing false information and broadcasting without a license. Read related story: #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

WATCH: The Director of Public Prosecutions has withdrawn four charges under the Computer Misuse Act against lawyer Male Mabirizi, following a Constitutional Court ruling that nullified the law. However, the court has instituted three new charges against him, including publishing false information and broadcasting without a license. Read related story: #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

65,980 次观看 • 5 个月前

WATCH: Kalungu East MP-elect Yusuf Kiruuta Nkeretanyi has been arraigned before Buganda Road Court on theft charges. He is accused of stealing curtains, cushions, and curtain holders worth Shs 3.7 billion from Hajj Sulaiman Lwabuuka Kasule between 2018 and January 2022 at Eagle Plaza, Central Division, Kampala. Nkeretanyi and six others appeared before Chief Magistrate Ritah Kidasa Neumbe, where the stolen items were presented as evidence, and they have since been granted bail. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Juliet Kigongo

WATCH: Kalungu East MP-elect Yusuf Kiruuta Nkeretanyi has been arraigned before Buganda Road Court on theft charges. He is accused of stealing curtains, cushions, and curtain holders worth Shs 3.7 billion from Hajj Sulaiman Lwabuuka Kasule between 2018 and January 2022 at Eagle Plaza, Central Division, Kampala. Nkeretanyi and six others appeared before Chief Magistrate Ritah Kidasa Neumbe, where the stolen items were presented as evidence, and they have since been granted bail. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

124,905 次观看 • 7 个月前

UPDATE: The Office of the DPP says it will appeal the acquittal of former Bukwo District LC5 chairperson Chelimo Julius Moses, who was cleared by the International Crimes Division of the High Court of charges of aggravated defilement and aggravated trafficking in children, allegedly committed in October 2021. Justice Duncan Gaswaga ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, but prosecutors argue it is inconsistent to acquit the alleged prime suspect when two co-accused pleaded guilty and were convicted. Despite the acquittal, Chelimo remains in custody over similar charges before another court. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Juliet Kigongo

UPDATE: The Office of the DPP says it will appeal the acquittal of former Bukwo District LC5 chairperson Chelimo Julius Moses, who was cleared by the International Crimes Division of the High Court of charges of aggravated defilement and aggravated trafficking in children, allegedly committed in October 2021. Justice Duncan Gaswaga ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, but prosecutors argue it is inconsistent to acquit the alleged prime suspect when two co-accused pleaded guilty and were convicted. Despite the acquittal, Chelimo remains in custody over similar charges before another court. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

26,528 次观看 • 7 个月前

UPDATE: A retired Assistant Inspector of Police, Joy Mary Nakku, has told the Buganda Road Chief Magistrate's Court that 12 rolls of curtain material allegedly stolen from businessman Hajj Sulaiman Lwabuuka Kasule were recovered from a shop belonging to Kalungu East MP Yusuf Kiruluuta Nkerettanyi. Nakku was testifying in the Shs3.7 billion curtain theft case in which Nkerettanyi and four others are facing charges. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

UPDATE: A retired Assistant Inspector of Police, Joy Mary Nakku, has told the Buganda Road Chief Magistrate's Court that 12 rolls of curtain material allegedly stolen from businessman Hajj Sulaiman Lwabuuka Kasule were recovered from a shop belonging to Kalungu East MP Yusuf Kiruluuta Nkerettanyi. Nakku was testifying in the Shs3.7 billion curtain theft case in which Nkerettanyi and four others are facing charges. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

221,970 次观看 • 2 个月前

UPDATE: The High Court has rejected a flash disc containing photographs taken at the Katanga family residence by defence witness Eric Kulu in the murder trial of businessman Henry Katanga. Justice Comfort Kania ruled that although the photographs were relevant, the defence failed to sufficiently prove their authenticity. The court noted that the original images had been deleted from both the memory card and computer, making it impossible to compare them with the copies on the flash disc. Justice Kania also ruled that metadata alone was insufficient to establish that the photographs had remained complete and unaltered. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

UPDATE: The High Court has rejected a flash disc containing photographs taken at the Katanga family residence by defence witness Eric Kulu in the murder trial of businessman Henry Katanga. Justice Comfort Kania ruled that although the photographs were relevant, the defence failed to sufficiently prove their authenticity. The court noted that the original images had been deleted from both the memory card and computer, making it impossible to compare them with the copies on the flash disc. Justice Kania also ruled that metadata alone was insufficient to establish that the photographs had remained complete and unaltered. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

107,004 次观看 • 1 天前

Kajjansi Chief Magistrate Doreen Olga Karunga has dismissed the petition filed by Busiro South’s Charles Matovu challenging the victory of NRM’s Kenan Opio. The Magistrate ruled that the evidence presented by Matovu was insufficient and ordered him to compensate Opio for all costs incurred in the case. #NTVNews Matovu had sought a vote recount in 25 polling stations, claiming his agents were chased away and results later showed he received no votes, an allegation the court rejected. His lawyer, Farok Sserunkuma, said they disagree with the ruling and will appeal. 📽️Vincent Kato

Kajjansi Chief Magistrate Doreen Olga Karunga has dismissed the petition filed by Busiro South’s Charles Matovu challenging the victory of NRM’s Kenan Opio. The Magistrate ruled that the evidence presented by Matovu was insufficient and ordered him to compensate Opio for all costs incurred in the case. #NTVNews Matovu had sought a vote recount in 25 polling stations, claiming his agents were chased away and results later showed he received no votes, an allegation the court rejected. His lawyer, Farok Sserunkuma, said they disagree with the ruling and will appeal. 📽️Vincent Kato

NTV UGANDA

53,173 次观看 • 7 个月前

UPDATE: A 28-year-old man accused of illegally practicing law and posing as a qualified advocate has been remanded to prison by the Buganda Road Chief Magistrate's Court. Andrew Nsubuga Sekibaamu Jenkins, a resident of Najjera in Kira Municipality, Wakiso District, appeared before Senior Magistrate Winnie Nankya Jatiko and denied two charges under the Advocates Act, Cap. 295. Prosecutors allege that between February and December 2025, Nsubuga unlawfully acted as an advocate for Nagadya Linda in Civil Suit No. 188 of 2024 before the High Court Land Division in Kampala despite not being qualified to practice. The court remanded him to prison pending further proceedings. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Lubowa Abubaker

UPDATE: A 28-year-old man accused of illegally practicing law and posing as a qualified advocate has been remanded to prison by the Buganda Road Chief Magistrate's Court. Andrew Nsubuga Sekibaamu Jenkins, a resident of Najjera in Kira Municipality, Wakiso District, appeared before Senior Magistrate Winnie Nankya Jatiko and denied two charges under the Advocates Act, Cap. 295. Prosecutors allege that between February and December 2025, Nsubuga unlawfully acted as an advocate for Nagadya Linda in Civil Suit No. 188 of 2024 before the High Court Land Division in Kampala despite not being qualified to practice. The court remanded him to prison pending further proceedings. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Lubowa Abubaker

Daily Monitor

188,106 次观看 • 1 个月前

A 53-year-old salesman has been charged before the Buganda Road Chief Magistrate’s Court for allegedly defrauding a senior government official of Shs218 million under the guise of selling her land in Buikwe District. According to the charge sheet, Kaddu and others, still at large, between 2018 and 2025 at Crested Towers in Kampala, allegedly obtained Shs218 million from Lucy Nakyobe, the Head of Public Service and Secretary to the Cabinet, by falsely claiming they were selling her 23 acres of land in Lugazi, Buikwe District. #MonitorUpdates 📹Juliet Kigongo

A 53-year-old salesman has been charged before the Buganda Road Chief Magistrate’s Court for allegedly defrauding a senior government official of Shs218 million under the guise of selling her land in Buikwe District. According to the charge sheet, Kaddu and others, still at large, between 2018 and 2025 at Crested Towers in Kampala, allegedly obtained Shs218 million from Lucy Nakyobe, the Head of Public Service and Secretary to the Cabinet, by falsely claiming they were selling her 23 acres of land in Lugazi, Buikwe District. #MonitorUpdates 📹Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

28,399 次观看 • 9 个月前

The High Court on Monday dismissed a case against three brothers, Bharat Ramji, Harish Ramji and Ashvin Ramji, who were arrested by DCI over allegations of forging NSSF transfer documents to obtain land in Athi River, citing an active stay order from the Court of Appeal that barred any prosecution or arrest linked to the matter. Chief Magistrate Dolphina Alego ruled that proceeding with the charges would create fertile ground for conflicting judicial decisions, given that the land dispute is already under review in multiple courts, including the Supreme Court, and that the charge sheet referred to the same land covered by the earlier appellate ruling. The Ramji brothers had challenged the dismissal of their judicial review case in Kiambu, prompting the September 20, 2024, order from a three-judge Court of Appeal bench led by Justices Lesiit, Mativo, and Gachoka, which explicitly paused any arrests or prosecution while the appeal was pending. Lawyers for the family, including senior counsel Nelson Havi, Orange Ndegwa, and Echesa, argued that the recent DCI arrests violated the standing order, effectively risking abuse of court process and conflicting judicial outcomes. The court’s ruling stated that the charges could not proceed because they involved the same land reference number already under appellate review, rendering the application defective and unable to stand until the appeal is resolved.

The High Court on Monday dismissed a case against three brothers, Bharat Ramji, Harish Ramji and Ashvin Ramji, who were arrested by DCI over allegations of forging NSSF transfer documents to obtain land in Athi River, citing an active stay order from the Court of Appeal that barred any prosecution or arrest linked to the matter. Chief Magistrate Dolphina Alego ruled that proceeding with the charges would create fertile ground for conflicting judicial decisions, given that the land dispute is already under review in multiple courts, including the Supreme Court, and that the charge sheet referred to the same land covered by the earlier appellate ruling. The Ramji brothers had challenged the dismissal of their judicial review case in Kiambu, prompting the September 20, 2024, order from a three-judge Court of Appeal bench led by Justices Lesiit, Mativo, and Gachoka, which explicitly paused any arrests or prosecution while the appeal was pending. Lawyers for the family, including senior counsel Nelson Havi, Orange Ndegwa, and Echesa, argued that the recent DCI arrests violated the standing order, effectively risking abuse of court process and conflicting judicial outcomes. The court’s ruling stated that the charges could not proceed because they involved the same land reference number already under appellate review, rendering the application defective and unable to stand until the appeal is resolved.

Nyakundi Report

28,267 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨UPDATE: Two women who have accused Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexual offences are not “sufficiently reliable enough” for a guilty verdict to be reached, jury told 🎤Chief Reporter James from Newry Crown Court. The closing speeches have now finished and, looking ahead to tomorrow, Judge Paul Ramsey told the jury he would deliver his charge before they retire to consider their verdicts. Former DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson has pleaded not guilty to 18 alleged offences. The charges include one count of rape and allegations of indecent assault and gross indecency, and span a period between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims. Complainants A and B have both given evidence at the trial. Both women allege they were abused as children. Mr Donaldson's wife, Lady Eleanor Donaldson, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending. She is facing a trial of the facts on mental health grounds. The trial of the facts will test the evidence in the case but cannot result in a criminal conviction. Read more online and hear more on-air.

🚨UPDATE: Two women who have accused Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexual offences are not “sufficiently reliable enough” for a guilty verdict to be reached, jury told 🎤Chief Reporter James from Newry Crown Court. The closing speeches have now finished and, looking ahead to tomorrow, Judge Paul Ramsey told the jury he would deliver his charge before they retire to consider their verdicts. Former DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson has pleaded not guilty to 18 alleged offences. The charges include one count of rape and allegations of indecent assault and gross indecency, and span a period between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims. Complainants A and B have both given evidence at the trial. Both women allege they were abused as children. Mr Donaldson's wife, Lady Eleanor Donaldson, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending. She is facing a trial of the facts on mental health grounds. The trial of the facts will test the evidence in the case but cannot result in a criminal conviction. Read more online and hear more on-air.

Cool FM News

18,762 次观看 • 2 个月前

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || info@vendr.ng ||

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || [email protected] ||

Trending Explained

103,162 次观看 • 1 年前

Excerpts from CJ Malaba's biography as read by Deputy Chief Justice, Honourable Elizabeth Gwaunza: -During the time that he was Judge of Appeal and a Deputy Chief Justice, he was also a Judge of the COMESA Court of Justice for more than a decade (2005-2016). -Mr Justice Malaba is an accomplished human rights defender who has taken advantage of his judicial posting by delivering judgments that protect the fundamental human rights of the vulnerable including women, children and persons with disabilities amongst others. -Since his appointment as the Chief Justice, he has led the judiciary and the Judicial Service Commission in taking deliberate steps meant to enhance access to justice for the people of Zimbabwe through the construction of courthouses in various parts of the country, simplifying court rules so that they are easily understood by ordinary persons and increasing the number of judicial officers both in the magistracy and superior courts. -Under his stewardship, the courts in Zimbabwe are moving towards digitisation through the Integrated Electronic Case Management System (I.E.C.M.S). The first phase of the I.E.C.M.S. was launched on 1 May 2022, at the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court and the Commercial Division of the High Court. -This July 2025, under his leadership, the Judicial Service Commission launched the I.E.C.M.S. in the magistrates courts. This phase marks the final stage of the digitisation of Zimbabwe's courts. -Mr Justice Malaba has participated in various training programmes both in the country and the region. He contributed significantly to collaboration in the continental judicial space through Zimbabwe's hosting of the 7th Congress of the Conference of Constitutional Jurisdictions of Africa (CJCA) and the African Electoral Justice Network (AEJN). -He is the current President of the CJCA, serving from 2024 to 2026. -Justice Malaba has also established the Judicial Training Institute of Zimbabwe (JTIZ) whose sole mandate is to develop human capital through training of judicial and non-judicial staff of the Judicial Service Commission.

Excerpts from CJ Malaba's biography as read by Deputy Chief Justice, Honourable Elizabeth Gwaunza: -During the time that he was Judge of Appeal and a Deputy Chief Justice, he was also a Judge of the COMESA Court of Justice for more than a decade (2005-2016). -Mr Justice Malaba is an accomplished human rights defender who has taken advantage of his judicial posting by delivering judgments that protect the fundamental human rights of the vulnerable including women, children and persons with disabilities amongst others. -Since his appointment as the Chief Justice, he has led the judiciary and the Judicial Service Commission in taking deliberate steps meant to enhance access to justice for the people of Zimbabwe through the construction of courthouses in various parts of the country, simplifying court rules so that they are easily understood by ordinary persons and increasing the number of judicial officers both in the magistracy and superior courts. -Under his stewardship, the courts in Zimbabwe are moving towards digitisation through the Integrated Electronic Case Management System (I.E.C.M.S). The first phase of the I.E.C.M.S. was launched on 1 May 2022, at the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court and the Commercial Division of the High Court. -This July 2025, under his leadership, the Judicial Service Commission launched the I.E.C.M.S. in the magistrates courts. This phase marks the final stage of the digitisation of Zimbabwe's courts. -Mr Justice Malaba has participated in various training programmes both in the country and the region. He contributed significantly to collaboration in the continental judicial space through Zimbabwe's hosting of the 7th Congress of the Conference of Constitutional Jurisdictions of Africa (CJCA) and the African Electoral Justice Network (AEJN). -He is the current President of the CJCA, serving from 2024 to 2026. -Justice Malaba has also established the Judicial Training Institute of Zimbabwe (JTIZ) whose sole mandate is to develop human capital through training of judicial and non-judicial staff of the Judicial Service Commission.

Nick Mangwana

21,772 次观看 • 3 个月前

UPDATE: Buganda Road Chief Magistrate, Ronald Kayizzi, has this morning granted a cash bail of Shs5 million to Noah Mitala, a bodyguard to National Unity Platform principal BOBI WINE. Each of his sureties was bonded with a non-cash bail of Shs50 million #MonitorUpdates Mitala is jointly charged with ASP Charles Twine for allegedly inciting violence and disseminating malicious communication against senior government officials, including President Museveni and Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, between January 2024 and May 2025. Both defendants have pleaded not guilty. The duo, now released on bail, are expected to return to court on August 25 for mention of the case. 📹 Juliet Kigongo

UPDATE: Buganda Road Chief Magistrate, Ronald Kayizzi, has this morning granted a cash bail of Shs5 million to Noah Mitala, a bodyguard to National Unity Platform principal BOBI WINE. Each of his sureties was bonded with a non-cash bail of Shs50 million #MonitorUpdates Mitala is jointly charged with ASP Charles Twine for allegedly inciting violence and disseminating malicious communication against senior government officials, including President Museveni and Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, between January 2024 and May 2025. Both defendants have pleaded not guilty. The duo, now released on bail, are expected to return to court on August 25 for mention of the case. 📹 Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

43,807 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨UPDATE: Trial hears two women who accused Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexually abusing them claim he subjected them to “difficult and traumatic incidents” when they were children 🎤Chief Reporter James from Newry Crown Court. The former DUP Leader is accused of rape and several counts of gross indecency and of indecent assault. He has pleaded not guilty to the 18 alleged offences. The charges span between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims. Mr Donaldson’s wife Lady Eleanor Donaldson, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending. She is facing a trial of the facts. Barrister Rosemary Walsh KC opened the prosecution case by summarising the evidence. She told the jury they would hear evidence from witnesses as well as police interviews carried out with the Donaldsons at the time of their arrest in 2024. Ms Walsh said two complainants had come forward to police more than two years ago and reported “difficult and traumatic incidents they say happened when they were children”. She said the evidence of the two complainants would in part be delivered during the trial by pre-recorded interviews. She said they would be cross-examined by barristers but would not come into the court. Ms Walsh said that in March 2024 Complainant B told police that she had been sexually abused when she was a child and that she remembered two incidents “vividly”. In the first alleged incident, she told the police that Jeffrey Donaldson had put his hands down her underwear, pulled her legs apart and then sexually assaulted her. In the second incident she told police that Donaldson had lifted her top and started to touch her breasts. Ms Walsh said Complainant B had said there were other incidents and that Donaldson had put his hands down her pants “a lot”. The barrister told the jury that Complainant B had later been at a meeting with Donaldson at a Christian centre and he had “apologised to her for what had happened in the past”. Ms Walsh then turned to the evidence that would be presented during the trial by Complainant A. Complainant A also made a statement to police in March 2024. She alleged that Donaldson touched her on a number of occasions under her top when she was a child. She told police that touching her had become something he had “done quite often”. She told police that Donaldson would make comments about her appearance, including the size of her breasts. She recalled one incident where she claimed that Donaldson had been “looking at her private parts”. The jury was told that the Donaldsons had been arrested on March 28 2024 and were subject to a number of police interviews. In Jeffrey Donaldson’s interview, when Complainant B’s account was put to him, he said it was “unbelievable” that he would have touched her in a sexual way. Regarding Complainant A, he denied that he ever rubbed her breast. Eleanor Donaldson is facing a trial of the facts, not a criminal trial, after Judge Paul Ramsey ruled her unfit to stand trial on mental health grounds. The trial of the facts will test the evidence in the case but cannot result in a criminal conviction. It is being heard by the same jury, with proceedings against both Donaldsons running simultaneously as part of one overall trial process presided over by Judge Ramsey. The trial continues.

🚨UPDATE: Trial hears two women who accused Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexually abusing them claim he subjected them to “difficult and traumatic incidents” when they were children 🎤Chief Reporter James from Newry Crown Court. The former DUP Leader is accused of rape and several counts of gross indecency and of indecent assault. He has pleaded not guilty to the 18 alleged offences. The charges span between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims. Mr Donaldson’s wife Lady Eleanor Donaldson, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending. She is facing a trial of the facts. Barrister Rosemary Walsh KC opened the prosecution case by summarising the evidence. She told the jury they would hear evidence from witnesses as well as police interviews carried out with the Donaldsons at the time of their arrest in 2024. Ms Walsh said two complainants had come forward to police more than two years ago and reported “difficult and traumatic incidents they say happened when they were children”. She said the evidence of the two complainants would in part be delivered during the trial by pre-recorded interviews. She said they would be cross-examined by barristers but would not come into the court. Ms Walsh said that in March 2024 Complainant B told police that she had been sexually abused when she was a child and that she remembered two incidents “vividly”. In the first alleged incident, she told the police that Jeffrey Donaldson had put his hands down her underwear, pulled her legs apart and then sexually assaulted her. In the second incident she told police that Donaldson had lifted her top and started to touch her breasts. Ms Walsh said Complainant B had said there were other incidents and that Donaldson had put his hands down her pants “a lot”. The barrister told the jury that Complainant B had later been at a meeting with Donaldson at a Christian centre and he had “apologised to her for what had happened in the past”. Ms Walsh then turned to the evidence that would be presented during the trial by Complainant A. Complainant A also made a statement to police in March 2024. She alleged that Donaldson touched her on a number of occasions under her top when she was a child. She told police that touching her had become something he had “done quite often”. She told police that Donaldson would make comments about her appearance, including the size of her breasts. She recalled one incident where she claimed that Donaldson had been “looking at her private parts”. The jury was told that the Donaldsons had been arrested on March 28 2024 and were subject to a number of police interviews. In Jeffrey Donaldson’s interview, when Complainant B’s account was put to him, he said it was “unbelievable” that he would have touched her in a sexual way. Regarding Complainant A, he denied that he ever rubbed her breast. Eleanor Donaldson is facing a trial of the facts, not a criminal trial, after Judge Paul Ramsey ruled her unfit to stand trial on mental health grounds. The trial of the facts will test the evidence in the case but cannot result in a criminal conviction. It is being heard by the same jury, with proceedings against both Donaldsons running simultaneously as part of one overall trial process presided over by Judge Ramsey. The trial continues.

Cool FM News

42,589 次观看 • 3 个月前