Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

UPDATE: State Prosecutor Brian Kalinaki has asked Masaka High Court to return Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira’s case to the Chief Magistrate’s Court for plea in a Shs500 million money laundering case. Fr Ssekabira appeared before High Court judge Justice Victoria Nakintu Katamba, with the prosecution arguing that the procedure used...

DailyMonitor's profile picture

Daily Monitor

2,110,352 subscribers

145,274 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

UPDATE: Masaka High Court Judge Victoria Nakintu Katamba has dismissed the bail application filed by Rev Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira through his lawyers Samuel Muyizi and Sam Ssekyewa. Justice Nakintu has directed the state attorney to prepare the case for hearing, scheduled to begin on February 10. She warned that if the state is unprepared on that day, the bail application may be reconsidered. Fr Ssekabira is accused of laundering Shs500 million. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba
3:57

UPDATE: Masaka High Court Judge Victoria Nakintu Katamba has dismissed the bail application filed by Rev Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira through his lawyers Samuel Muyizi and Sam Ssekyewa. Justice Nakintu has directed the state attorney to prepare the case for hearing, scheduled to begin on February 10. She warned that if the state is unprepared on that day, the bail application may be reconsidered. Fr Ssekabira is accused of laundering Shs500 million. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba

Daily Monitor

117,922 views • 6 months ago

UPDATE: Principal State Attorney Betty Karungi Gafabusa has requested that the High Court in Masaka adjourn the case against Rev Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira, accused of laundering Shs500 million, to February 4 to allow key parties, the Minister of Defense and Inspector General of Police to file affidavits. However, defense lawyers have objected noting the parties were served on January 13 and the hearing, already postponed to January 27, should proceed. The judge, Victoria Nakintu Katamba is expected to rule on the matter soon. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba
2:41

UPDATE: Principal State Attorney Betty Karungi Gafabusa has requested that the High Court in Masaka adjourn the case against Rev Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira, accused of laundering Shs500 million, to February 4 to allow key parties, the Minister of Defense and Inspector General of Police to file affidavits. However, defense lawyers have objected noting the parties were served on January 13 and the hearing, already postponed to January 27, should proceed. The judge, Victoria Nakintu Katamba is expected to rule on the matter soon. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba

Daily Monitor

171,550 views • 6 months ago

UPDATE: Jubilation as Masaka priest Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira, charged with money laundering, is granted bail. Masaka High Court judge, Justice Victoria Nakintu, ruled that he had presented substantial sureties. 📹: Malik Fahad Jjingo
1:14

UPDATE: Jubilation as Masaka priest Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira, charged with money laundering, is granted bail. Masaka High Court judge, Justice Victoria Nakintu, ruled that he had presented substantial sureties. 📹: Malik Fahad Jjingo

Daily Monitor

82,526 views • 5 months ago

UPDATE: Samuel Muyizzi, the lawyer representing NUP’s Rose Nalubowa, has petitioned the Masaka High Court challenging the decision by Chief Magistrate Abert Asiimwe to declare NRM’s Justine Nameere the Masaka City MP-elect, arguing that the declaration was made in error. Nameere was declared the winner on Sunday night with 25,502 votes, while Nalubowa polled 23,176 following a four-day recount exercise. Muyizzi argues that the grounds relied upon by the Chief Magistrate to make the declaration were erroneous and has asked the High Court to deliver its ruling within 7 days, before the statutory deadline expires. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba
4:40

UPDATE: Samuel Muyizzi, the lawyer representing NUP’s Rose Nalubowa, has petitioned the Masaka High Court challenging the decision by Chief Magistrate Abert Asiimwe to declare NRM’s Justine Nameere the Masaka City MP-elect, arguing that the declaration was made in error. Nameere was declared the winner on Sunday night with 25,502 votes, while Nalubowa polled 23,176 following a four-day recount exercise. Muyizzi argues that the grounds relied upon by the Chief Magistrate to make the declaration were erroneous and has asked the High Court to deliver its ruling within 7 days, before the statutory deadline expires. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba

Daily Monitor

73,272 views • 6 months ago

Celebration erupts in Nakawa Court as supporters of Dr. Kizza Besigye and Hajji Obeid Lutale cheer a ruling by Chief Magistrate Christine Nantege, who declared the court no longer has jurisdiction after the case was committed to the High Court. #NTVNews 📹 @lbrahim_kavuma
0:59

Celebration erupts in Nakawa Court as supporters of Dr. Kizza Besigye and Hajji Obeid Lutale cheer a ruling by Chief Magistrate Christine Nantege, who declared the court no longer has jurisdiction after the case was committed to the High Court. #NTVNews 📹 @lbrahim_kavuma

NTV UGANDA

79,190 views • 1 year ago

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.
3:34

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,408 views • 6 months ago

"Everyone Can't Come Directly to the Supreme Court" A dramatic exchange unfolded in the Supreme Court after a petitioner repeatedly insisted that her plea under Article 32 was maintainable, despite the Bench advising her to approach the jurisdictional High Court. As the arguments continued, the Court stressed the importance of following the judicial hierarchy, observing that parties cannot bypass High Courts and approach the Supreme Court directly in every case. The hearing ended with the Bench dismissing the plea while granting liberty to seek appropriate relief before the High Court. [ Lawbeat, Legal News, Supreme Court ] #SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange #Article32 #HighCourt #LegalNews
2:13

"Everyone Can't Come Directly to the Supreme Court" A dramatic exchange unfolded in the Supreme Court after a petitioner repeatedly insisted that her plea under Article 32 was maintainable, despite the Bench advising her to approach the jurisdictional High Court. As the arguments continued, the Court stressed the importance of following the judicial hierarchy, observing that parties cannot bypass High Courts and approach the Supreme Court directly in every case. The hearing ended with the Bench dismissing the plea while granting liberty to seek appropriate relief before the High Court. [ Lawbeat, Legal News, Supreme Court ] #SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange #Article32 #HighCourt #LegalNews

LawBeat

69,757 views • 2 months ago

WATCH: Caleb Alaka, the lawyer for Joseph Gonzaga Ssewungu, has asked the court to dismiss the petition, arguing that the Chief Magistrate’s Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the matter. The petition is before Masaka Chief Magistrate Herbert Asiimwe, where Ismael Ssemakula is seeking a vote recount in the Kalungu West Constituency parliamentary race, claiming his victory was 'robbed'. According to the declared Electoral Commission results, Ssewungu garnered 101,606 votes, while Ssemakula received 10,069 votes. #MonitorUpdates #UgandaDecides2026 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba
4:37

WATCH: Caleb Alaka, the lawyer for Joseph Gonzaga Ssewungu, has asked the court to dismiss the petition, arguing that the Chief Magistrate’s Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the matter. The petition is before Masaka Chief Magistrate Herbert Asiimwe, where Ismael Ssemakula is seeking a vote recount in the Kalungu West Constituency parliamentary race, claiming his victory was 'robbed'. According to the declared Electoral Commission results, Ssewungu garnered 101,606 votes, while Ssemakula received 10,069 votes. #MonitorUpdates #UgandaDecides2026 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba

Daily Monitor

113,576 views • 6 months ago

UPDATE: State prosecutors have asked the High Court to impose the death penalty on Christopher Okello Onyum following his conviction on four counts of murder. The court is expected to consider submissions from both the prosecution and defence before delivering its sentence, Lubowa Abubaker reports. #MonitorUpdates
3:28

UPDATE: State prosecutors have asked the High Court to impose the death penalty on Christopher Okello Onyum following his conviction on four counts of murder. The court is expected to consider submissions from both the prosecution and defence before delivering its sentence, Lubowa Abubaker reports. #MonitorUpdates

Daily Monitor

24,466 views • 3 months ago

Today, the decision was delivered in Justice Swarn Kanta Sharma's court. Arvind Kejriwal and his colleagues, who were discharged, told the court that they had a reasonable apprehension that they would not receive justice from this court. Arvind Kejriwal listed ten points, stating the main reasons for this apprehension. The court declared that all these apprehensions were legally untenable. The special judge Geetanjali Goel was changed on doubts being cast by ED (Central Govt). Just because the Judge asked tough questions from ED. If the High Court were actually concerned about the judiciary's image, then Chief Minister Rekha Gupta should have been held for contempt. CM had said that the Rouse Avenue Court judge was set, and that is why Arvind Kejriwal was discharged., The High Court should have initiated contempt proceedings against Rekha Gupta. I personally wrote a letter to the High Court Registrar, stating that Rekha Gupta has said this about your judiciary... If the Supreme Court remains silent on a situation where a sitting Chief Minister says something like this, it raises serious questions about the Supreme Court, the High Court, and the entire institution...
5:27

Today, the decision was delivered in Justice Swarn Kanta Sharma's court. Arvind Kejriwal and his colleagues, who were discharged, told the court that they had a reasonable apprehension that they would not receive justice from this court. Arvind Kejriwal listed ten points, stating the main reasons for this apprehension. The court declared that all these apprehensions were legally untenable. The special judge Geetanjali Goel was changed on doubts being cast by ED (Central Govt). Just because the Judge asked tough questions from ED. If the High Court were actually concerned about the judiciary's image, then Chief Minister Rekha Gupta should have been held for contempt. CM had said that the Rouse Avenue Court judge was set, and that is why Arvind Kejriwal was discharged., The High Court should have initiated contempt proceedings against Rekha Gupta. I personally wrote a letter to the High Court Registrar, stating that Rekha Gupta has said this about your judiciary... If the Supreme Court remains silent on a situation where a sitting Chief Minister says something like this, it raises serious questions about the Supreme Court, the High Court, and the entire institution...

Saurabh Bharadwaj

55,034 views • 3 months ago

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate HS Phoolka said on Supreme Court hearing a plea challenging the Madras High Court judgment which held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. "In the child pornography case, the Madras High Court had held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. However, during the hearing in Supreme Court today, the CJI was shocked over the verdict of the Madras High Court. He said that it is a clear offence and has issued a notice over it."
2:12

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate HS Phoolka said on Supreme Court hearing a plea challenging the Madras High Court judgment which held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. "In the child pornography case, the Madras High Court had held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. However, during the hearing in Supreme Court today, the CJI was shocked over the verdict of the Madras High Court. He said that it is a clear offence and has issued a notice over it."

Press Trust of India

43,055 views • 2 years ago

Senior #Silkkim High Court judge, Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai, took oath in #Hindi as Chief Justice of the #Patna High Court. She is among the relatively few HC chiefs to have risen from the judicial service, progressing from judicial officer to the head of a high court.
1:21

Senior #Silkkim High Court judge, Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai, took oath in #Hindi as Chief Justice of the #Patna High Court. She is among the relatively few HC chiefs to have risen from the judicial service, progressing from judicial officer to the head of a high court.

Utkarsh Anand

52,015 views • 2 months ago

WATCH: NUP Election Management Committee member John Mary Ssebuufu has been charged with incitement to violence at Chief Magistrate’s Court, Nakawa. He has been in detention for over two weeks, and a habeas corpus petition challenging his detention was filed in the High Court. A ruling was expected today, but according to his lawyer Jonathan Erotu, the proceedings were frustrated when he was produced in court. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Lubowa Abubaker
2:31

WATCH: NUP Election Management Committee member John Mary Ssebuufu has been charged with incitement to violence at Chief Magistrate’s Court, Nakawa. He has been in detention for over two weeks, and a habeas corpus petition challenging his detention was filed in the High Court. A ruling was expected today, but according to his lawyer Jonathan Erotu, the proceedings were frustrated when he was produced in court. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Lubowa Abubaker

Daily Monitor

39,964 views • 6 months ago

The very same Supreme Court that shielded a High Court judge accused of corruption is today silent while another High Court judge is being abused and harassed by the DMK govt determined to crush judicial independence. My views, on the brave Justice Swaminathan standing alone:
2:25

The very same Supreme Court that shielded a High Court judge accused of corruption is today silent while another High Court judge is being abused and harassed by the DMK govt determined to crush judicial independence. My views, on the brave Justice Swaminathan standing alone:

Anand Ranganathan

172,383 views • 7 months ago

The Ashanti Regional Chairman of the NPP, Chairman Wontumi, has arrived at the Accra High Court as the court is expected to deliver its final judgment on allegations of his involvement in illegal mining activities within forest reserves. However, his legal team has filed an application seeking a suspension of the judgment, arguing that a constitutional interpretation case related to the matter is currently pending before the Supreme Court. His lead counsel, Lawyer Samuel Atta Akyea, who is currently out of the country, has also informed the court that he is expected to return on June 22. The court is expected to first determine whether to proceed with the judgment or grant the request by the defense team to put the matter on hold. [🎥: GhBrain]
0:45

The Ashanti Regional Chairman of the NPP, Chairman Wontumi, has arrived at the Accra High Court as the court is expected to deliver its final judgment on allegations of his involvement in illegal mining activities within forest reserves. However, his legal team has filed an application seeking a suspension of the judgment, arguing that a constitutional interpretation case related to the matter is currently pending before the Supreme Court. His lead counsel, Lawyer Samuel Atta Akyea, who is currently out of the country, has also informed the court that he is expected to return on June 22. The court is expected to first determine whether to proceed with the judgment or grant the request by the defense team to put the matter on hold. [🎥: GhBrain]

SIKAOFFICIAL🦍

133,213 views • 16 days ago

🇵🇰 EXCLUSIVE | IMRAN KHAN'S SISTER: CHIEF JUSTICE REFUSES TO HEAR IMRAN KHAN CASE ON MERIT Aleema Khanum "Imran Khan was charged with conspiracy relating to May 9th. The High Court, our judge, our lawyers went in, and we are laypersons. We really don’t have to understand everything; we are not legal people. But the courtroom was full, and we all saw how well Imran Khan’s lawyer, Salman Safdar, was handling the case. He basically laid out the case clearly. The prosecutor was making arguments that were embarrassing, even for the judge to hear. Imran Khan should have been granted bail at that time. But that court, under orders, dismissed the bail. As a result, our lawyers went to the Supreme Court. And yesterday morning, not as we would have expected, we really didn’t anticipate even this, the Supreme Court was so embarrassed by the merits of the case that the Chief Justice, before even hearing the bail application, said to both the prosecutor and our lawyer: 'I will not hear this case on merit.'" Source: PTI, Aleema Khanum
3:07

🇵🇰 EXCLUSIVE | IMRAN KHAN'S SISTER: CHIEF JUSTICE REFUSES TO HEAR IMRAN KHAN CASE ON MERIT Aleema Khanum "Imran Khan was charged with conspiracy relating to May 9th. The High Court, our judge, our lawyers went in, and we are laypersons. We really don’t have to understand everything; we are not legal people. But the courtroom was full, and we all saw how well Imran Khan’s lawyer, Salman Safdar, was handling the case. He basically laid out the case clearly. The prosecutor was making arguments that were embarrassing, even for the judge to hear. Imran Khan should have been granted bail at that time. But that court, under orders, dismissed the bail. As a result, our lawyers went to the Supreme Court. And yesterday morning, not as we would have expected, we really didn’t anticipate even this, the Supreme Court was so embarrassed by the merits of the case that the Chief Justice, before even hearing the bail application, said to both the prosecutor and our lawyer: 'I will not hear this case on merit.'" Source: PTI, Aleema Khanum

Mario Nawfal

131,012 views • 11 months ago

An emotional Moroadi Cholota walked free after the Bloemfontein High Court ruled that her extradition to South Africa was unlawful. In a strongly worded judgment, the court found that South African authorities had misled their American counterparts in order to secure her return to face charges alongside Ace Magashule and others. Moreover, Judge Phillip Loubser stated that his court lacks the jurisdiction to prosecute Cholota for the offences with which she has been charged with.
1:40

An emotional Moroadi Cholota walked free after the Bloemfontein High Court ruled that her extradition to South Africa was unlawful. In a strongly worded judgment, the court found that South African authorities had misled their American counterparts in order to secure her return to face charges alongside Ace Magashule and others. Moreover, Judge Phillip Loubser stated that his court lacks the jurisdiction to prosecute Cholota for the offences with which she has been charged with.

MDN NEWS

67,538 views • 1 year ago