Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

⚖️ UPDATE: Utah v. Tyler Robinson The state just put up its DNA analyst. Two contributors. Twiggs is one. The math points hard at Robinson as the other as to their testimony. Testimony, on the record: 🧬 "Male DNA was obtained from item seven sub one... one of whom...

40,963 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

14,453 views • 25 days ago

‼️Candace Owens On The Shawn Ryan Podcast: "Tyler Robinson Is Total Patsy" — He Was Set Up By Lance Twiggs In the interview, Candace said she’s confident Tyler Robinson did not murder Charlie Kirk. At most, she believes he may have been an accessory — but she strongly suspects he was set up. She pointed directly at Tyler’s roommate and boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, calling him a likely federal asset. Candace noted that it’s “bonkers” the police never even questioned Lance, despite him being central to the official story they’re pushing. Her reasoning: If they were in a relationship, Lance would have had easy access to Tyler’s guns. It would have been simple for Lance to set Tyler up. She suggested Tyler may have been blackmailed, possibly through “weird stuff online” — the easiest way for the feds to control someone. This lines up with what many of us have been saying for months: Tyler Robinson doesn’t fit the profile of a lone gunman. The speed at which the “official story” was locked in, combined with the lack of scrutiny on Lance Twiggs, has always been one of the biggest red flags. If Lance Twiggs really is a federal asset who set Tyler up, then this wasn’t just a random act of violence — it was a coordinated operation. The more we learn, the clearer it becomes that the public is not being told the full story about what happened at UVU. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Shawn Ryan RT this. The truth is starting to come out.

Project Constitution

25,727 views • 1 month ago

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out WHY Lance Twiggs SHOULD Be The Primary Suspect NOT Tyler Robinson 🔍🕵️‍♀️ Candace Owens just made the case that there is objectively more evidence pointing to Lance Twiggs than to Tyler Robinson. Lance’s DNA is on the towel and on the rifle — and it is less degraded than Tyler’s. The Dremel used to carve the bullets belonged to Lance. His alibi for September 10 is simply “I was sleeping,” and there is no indication the feds ever seriously tested it. He claims he found a handwritten note under the keyboard, photographed it, then burned the original — an action that does not actually destroy the evidence and raises the possibility he wrote it himself. The character profiles also diverge sharply. Tyler is consistently described as quiet and kind. Lance had repeated behavioral problems serious enough that multiple family members removed him from their homes. He was deep in furry culture with a fursona named Luna, a hellhound character that wears a pentagram. That detail makes the large dog bed found in Tyler’s room far more interesting than the official story allows. Handedness is another problem. The person in the maroon shirt on the stairs appears left-handed — phone in the left hand, slipped into the left pocket. Tyler is right-handed. Public photos and a childhood video of Lance show him using his left hand as dominant or strongly ambidextrous. The feds’ handling of Lance is also unusual: after a short interview they drove him home, then moved him and his father into a paid safe house. Candace’s position is straightforward. If the evidence against Tyler is supposedly overwhelming, the evidence against Lance is stronger. He had full access, matching DNA, the tool used on the ammunition, a weak alibi, and a profile that fits someone who could have been compromised online. The fact that he was never treated as a serious suspect is one of the biggest unresolved problems in the case. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

16,527 views • 1 day ago

🚨Watch Candace Owens cherry-pick and mischaracterise the testimony of the ATF's DNA expert - CUTTING AWAY before her audience sees the parts that completely undermine her narrative. Candace wants her audience to believe that because the DNA profile attributed to Tyler Robinson as the major contributor showed signs of degradation, that must mean the DNA was old - and therefore couldn't belong to the shooter. The problem? That's not what either DNA expert testified. In fact, moments after the cherry-picked clip Candace used, the ATF expert confirms she cannot determine when the DNA was deposited on the trigger or trigger guard. And just two days earlier, the FBI's DNA expert explained that degradation can result from many factors, such as, heat, humidity, cleaning, and other environmental factors, adding: "I really can't tell why an item is degraded." -The ATF expert did not testify that degradation meant the DNA was old -She did not testify it made the DNA unusable -She did not testify that it was inconsistent with the shooter That's Candace's conclusion - not the expert's testimony. And despite the degradation, the ATF expert still testified that the DNA profile was at least one trillion times more likely if it originated from Tyler Robinson as the major contributor than from four unknown unrelated individuals. That's exactly where Candace cuts away. It's another example of taking one sentence from an expert, stripping away the context, and presenting a conclusion the witness never reached. An honest investigator follows the evidence wherever it leads. Candace takes whatever evidence supports her predetermined narrative, distorts it - and hides the rest. The opposite of someone trying to find the truth.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

69,367 views • 24 days ago