Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇱🇧 U.S. Envoy Tom Barrack: “Lebanon Is a Failed State — the State Is Hezbollah” At Bahrain’s Manama Dialogue, U.S. envoy Tom Barrack delivered an openly interventionist pitch urging Lebanon to abandon its resistance and normalize with Israel. “The Lebanese talk and talk — they charm you into submission,”...

62,295 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“Don’t ask me any questions about what Israel is going to do until you disarm Hezbollah,” Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told Lebanese and international reporters in Beirut. Visiting the country as part of a U.S. congressional delegation with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC), he declared: “If you disarm Hezbollah, we’ll have a good conversation. If you don’t, it’s a meaningless conversation.” The group met with President Joseph Aoun before holding a press conference, followed by another briefing by Trump’s envoys Tom Barrack and Morgan Ortagus. Graham insisted Lebanon is “going backward, not forward” unless it strips Palestinians and Hezbollah of weapons and makes the Lebanese Army the “central repository of arms.” “Israel’s never going to look at Lebanon differently until you do something different,” he told the Lebanese people — who lost nearly 4,000 citizens, saw more than 16,000 wounded, and 1.2 million displaced at the hands of Israel’s invasion and war in 2024. At one point, Graham reminded journalists that he and Rep. Wilson are U.S. “appropriators — “we have the money,” he said — underscoring Washington’s leverage over Lebanon’s military and financial aid. Graham — joined by Shaheen and Wilson, who echoed his broader demands — pressed Lebanon to disarm its main defense force against Israel’s expanding occupation and near-daily cross-border strikes, even as Israel, which has already blown past two withdrawal deadlines under the November ceasefire, and which continues to illegally occupy five outposts in the south, maintains its posture. Pressed repeatedly by reporters on what Israel would do in return, Graham’s answer was the same: “Then you talk to Israel — once Hezbollah has been disarmed.” He portrayed the resistance group — which continues to enjoy massive popular support in the country’s south — as foreign-controlled and illegitimate: Hezbollah is “not loyal to the people”; its “agenda is not Lebanon’s agenda,” he told one Lebanese reporter. For Graham and the Trump administration, once Hezbollah is gone only then will Israel and the U.S. consider treating Lebanon differently. He was adamant that disarmament would be the country’s sole path to relief — as he dangled prospects of a U.S.–Lebanon defense pact down the line.

Drop Site

40,780 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Question: What about Lebanon? Is Lebanon going to be part of a deal? U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Lebanon we’re working on separately. With Lebanon we are engaged now. We have a 45-day ceasefire. We’ve had weekly meetings now and ongoing daily engagements between the government of Lebanon and Israel. The problem is not Lebanon and Israel. The problem is Hezbollah. Just last night Hezbollah put out a statement calling for the overthrow of the Lebanese government. And it just reminds you who you’re dealing with here - by the way, an Iranian proxy, 100% Iranian proxy. And as long as an armed Hezbollah exists, it’s going to be hard to achieve peace in Lebanon because they’re victimizing the people of Lebanon. They’re not just attacking Israel. But we’re working that track with the Lebanese government and the Israeli government. And we’ve made some good progress there - an extended ceasefire, a path forward. We’re going to continue to work on that. Hezbollah is a terrorist group.” Question: "Would it be an understanding that Israel wouldn’t strike Lebanon as part of the deal?” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Israel always has a right to protect itself. Every country in the world does. So if Hezbollah is going to launch missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that from happening. That’s always been understood during the ceasefire, and it will be understood beyond that."

Open Source Intel

59,882 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇱🇧 Trump’s envoys in Lebanon, Tom Barrack and Morgan Ortagus (self-nicknamed “beauty and the beast”) used their press conference in Beirut today to pitch an “economic zone” for south Lebanon, backed by U.S. and Gulf investment, in exchange for Hezbollah’s disarmament. ▪️ They said Israel would withdraw from Lebanese territory “step by step” only in parallel with Lebanon’s plan to disarm Hezbollah. ➤ Barrack described this as a “cadence” — every Lebanese move to dismantle Hezbollah would be matched by an Israeli move, but the details would only be revealed once Lebanon produces a formal disarmament plan (expected by the end of August). Ortagus called the Lebanese government’s August 5 decision to consolidate weapons under state control “historic,” but said that “it’s not about words, now it’s about action.” ▪️ They framed Hezbollah’s arms as a product of Iranian financing and outside interference, and said the solution was to replace that support with Gulf and U.S. investment. ➤ Barrack argued Hezbollah’s fighters — “40,000 people being paid by Iran to fight” — could not simply be told to “go plant olive trees.” Instead, he pitched a new economic zone in the south, funded by Saudi and Qatari capital, as a substitute for Hezbollah’s infrastructure. ▪️ The envoys claimed Syria was ready for border agreements and Israel had privately signaled willingness to withdraw, but only once Lebanon commits to disarmament. ➤ ➤ Barrack — whose grandparents were Lebanese — lashed out at an eager press corps that tried to question him before he reached the stage. He scolded them for acting “animalistic” and not acting “civilized,” calling it a problem across the region. Unsurprisingly, the remarks drew backlash and were widely condemned in regional media as racist and condescending — consistent with the broader U.S. policy of dictating Lebanon’s future. 🎥 The full press conference is below.

Drop Site

59,371 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 WATCH: PM Netanyahu: “Citizens of Israel, before the Sabbath begins, I want to announce to you a great achievement for the State of Israel. You know that we are conducting negotiations in Washington between representatives of Israel, Lebanon, and the United States. Prolonged negotiations, and today they bore fruit. The most important thing is that, first of all, Israel remains in the security zone in southern Lebanon. This is a great achievement, and we are maintaining it as long as Hezbollah does not disarm, as long as there is a danger to the State of Israel. This is also a great blow to Iran. Iran is trying to force us to withdraw from southern Lebanon by force. And in essence, Israel, Lebanon, and the United States are telling them - this is none of your business. You have no role in Lebanon—neither you nor Hezbollah nor any terrorist organization. The other thing, of course, is that we are allowing the Lebanese army to begin organizing to seize territory. We are creating two pilot zones. Both are on the IDF's recommendation. And one is outside the security zone altogether, it's south of the Litani, and the other is north of the Litani, a small part of it in the expanded security zone that we achieved in the last two weeks, and that the IDF doesn't need it - he says it most clearly. We are constantly maintaining the original security zone outside the range of anti-tank missiles. We are not allowing Hezbollah to enter there, nor the population. That is being maintained. And the most important thing is that Israel says, "Our security comes first."

Raylan Givens

334,804 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

On Lebanese talkshow صار الوقت with Marcel Ghanem: 1. If Hezbollah is winning and beating Israel like it claims, then why is it dying to stop the war and be part of the Iran ceasefire? Why not go on and win back all the land from Israel? If the war stops this minute, at least 300,000 Lebanese won't be able to return to the buffer zone in south Lebanon. 2. The Lebanese keep on saying "Israeli aggression" while in reality, in 2006, 2023, 2026, Hezbollah was always the aggressor, the one that started the war. Also, from an international law perspective, Israel is in the clear defending itself while Lebanon is in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 (disarm Hezbollah). 3. Hezbollah chief Qassem published a book called The Resistance State that a government coexists with an armed non-state actor against global imperialism. Israel wants this model dead. Either Lebanon becomes a normal sovereign state responsible for any violence that originates from its territory, or Israel will keep a buffer zone like in Gaza until Hezbollah surrenders its arms. 4. Hezbollah surrendering its arms to win back land is great. After all the goal is for Shia to live in their land in peace. The goal is not to keep the arms. The arms is a tool and if throwing it away achieve the goal, then be it. 5. Disarming Hezbollah doesn't have to be war, it requires Lebanese political consensus to ask Hezbollah to surrender its arms to the army. It succeeded in 1982 when the Lebanese asked Arafat to leave Lebanon to stop the war with Israel. It succeeded in 2005 when the Lebanese ejected Assad's army from their country.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain

37,268 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I want to share this video from my trip to Syria two weeks ago to give you an idea of what half of the country looks like and more of an understanding of how beyond absurd it is for President Trump to say that Syria should take on Hezbollah. Aside from Syria being utterly physically and economically shattered, there is also the fact that it too is currently being occupied by Israel, who started bombing and grabbing more land the minute the regime of Bashar al-Assad fell. Worth remembering that the former Syrian regime, despite being part of the “axis” kept its border with Israel pretty quiet. Odd dynamic I know, but yes the old Syria facilitated the movement of weapons to Hezbollah while at the same time had a quiet deal with Israel and the US. As a senior official said to me back in those years, its better the devil we know who will stick to the status quo with Israel. Since al-Sharaa toppled the Assad regime, Israel has been regularly bombing and grabbing more Syrian land under that good old “national security” argument, even though al-Sharaa has repeatedly stated that he has no intention of attacking Israel and has in fact been rather passive on Israel’s actions. And yes he, the current government, many Syrians might hate Hezbollah for the role they played in propping up Bashar al-Assad and fighting with the former regime, but the sheer ludicrousness of suggesting they trot over to Lebanon and get rid of Hezbollah to help Israel is mindblowing, and not just from the Syria side but also can you imagine what Israel would do if the people whose military capabilities its bombing and “weakening” in Syria just showed up on its border with Lebanon?

Arwa Damon

19,453 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat