Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Utah charges a $15 fee to submit formal protests complaints & objections against large-scale developments like the proposed Box Elder County (Stratos) data center. Thousands paid the $15 fee, then developers withdrew the INITIAL application rendering those complaints null & void

Meidas_Charise Lee

309,089 subscribers

13,067 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is amazing. Now, there are no complaints about the Utah Data Center; they just threw them out. Now, registering a complaint with the data center will cost $15. I guess that's one way to stifle the opposition. #DemsUnited

This is amazing. Now, there are no complaints about the Utah Data Center; they just threw them out. Now, registering a complaint with the data center will cost $15. I guess that's one way to stifle the opposition. #DemsUnited

Rod (Izzy) 🇺🇸🦅

38,965 views • 2 months ago

Thousands of residents showed up to oppose a proposed data center in Box Elder County, Utah Public officials didn’t like this so they left the room, held the meeting in another room, blocked public comment and played their meeting on a projector to residents Insane corruption “The rest of the meeting was held via video stream from a different room, but projected to the audience” Government no longer serves the people in America, that’s blatantly obvious

Thousands of residents showed up to oppose a proposed data center in Box Elder County, Utah Public officials didn’t like this so they left the room, held the meeting in another room, blocked public comment and played their meeting on a projector to residents Insane corruption “The rest of the meeting was held via video stream from a different room, but projected to the audience” Government no longer serves the people in America, that’s blatantly obvious

Wall Street Apes

120,151 views • 2 months ago

🚨 The LARGEST "hyperscale" data center in the world is being proposed in Box Elder County, Utah. It's approx. 40,000 acres/62 square miles, backed by Canadian millionaire Kevin O’Leary. Fast-tracked by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority, backed by Gov. Spencer Cox, with the public locked out of the decision process. Utah, say hello to a 50% increase in CO₂ emissions, polluted water, and 24/7 noise and light pollution.

🚨 The LARGEST "hyperscale" data center in the world is being proposed in Box Elder County, Utah. It's approx. 40,000 acres/62 square miles, backed by Canadian millionaire Kevin O’Leary. Fast-tracked by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority, backed by Gov. Spencer Cox, with the public locked out of the decision process. Utah, say hello to a 50% increase in CO₂ emissions, polluted water, and 24/7 noise and light pollution.

Jason Bassler

751,791 views • 2 months ago

A Box Elder County commissioner is speaking out and crying crocodile tears after people protested in front of his house. He should’ve thought about this before he betrayed his community & voted to approve the biggest data center in the world. Zero sympathy for corrupt officials.

A Box Elder County commissioner is speaking out and crying crocodile tears after people protested in front of his house. He should’ve thought about this before he betrayed his community & voted to approve the biggest data center in the world. Zero sympathy for corrupt officials.

Power to the People ☭🕊

763,822 views • 2 months ago

Why is there suddenly such an aggressive push against American data centers and AI infrastructure? After seeing a major spike in coordinated opposition campaigns around our Utah projects, we conducted a digital audit and traced a large amount of the activity back to an organization called Alliance for a Better Utah, which has been pushing misinformation throughout Box Elder County about our data center developments. What’s even more concerning is where the funding appears to originate. After reviewing IRS Form 990 filings and tracing the network behind it, the money appears tied to Chinese linked funding channels connected through an organization called Arabella. Think about the incentive, if China is racing to dominate AI and compute capacity, why wouldn’t they want to slow American infrastructure down?

Why is there suddenly such an aggressive push against American data centers and AI infrastructure? After seeing a major spike in coordinated opposition campaigns around our Utah projects, we conducted a digital audit and traced a large amount of the activity back to an organization called Alliance for a Better Utah, which has been pushing misinformation throughout Box Elder County about our data center developments. What’s even more concerning is where the funding appears to originate. After reviewing IRS Form 990 filings and tracing the network behind it, the money appears tied to Chinese linked funding channels connected through an organization called Arabella. Think about the incentive, if China is racing to dominate AI and compute capacity, why wouldn’t they want to slow American infrastructure down?

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

1,308,072 views • 2 months ago

POLYMARKET TRADING BOTS COLLAPSED Remember those names? > a4385 > Account88888 > CRYINGLITTLEBABY > PurpleThunderBicycleMountain They are NOT active anymore. Last trade for each of them was two weeks ago. Some of them suffered major losses before disappearing. The reason? 15-minute fees. Looks like they decided to keep trading after the fee update. Then they realized that farming was over and dropped everything. However, I see new bots printing THOUSANDS out of nowhere. Example: [ His PnL? $215k in ONE WEEK Crypto 15-min markets only. This tells me one thing: The bot era didn’t end. The lazy bot era did. A new cycle just started. Devs who understand fee dynamics, execution timing, and order book behaviour will dominate. Same game. New rules.

POLYMARKET TRADING BOTS COLLAPSED Remember those names? > a4385 > Account88888 > CRYINGLITTLEBABY > PurpleThunderBicycleMountain They are NOT active anymore. Last trade for each of them was two weeks ago. Some of them suffered major losses before disappearing. The reason? 15-minute fees. Looks like they decided to keep trading after the fee update. Then they realized that farming was over and dropped everything. However, I see new bots printing THOUSANDS out of nowhere. Example: [ His PnL? $215k in ONE WEEK Crypto 15-min markets only. This tells me one thing: The bot era didn’t end. The lazy bot era did. A new cycle just started. Devs who understand fee dynamics, execution timing, and order book behaviour will dominate. Same game. New rules.

Dexter's Lab

22,318 views • 5 months ago

NEW: Erin Brockovich tells Theo Von that over 120 U.S. municipalities have now banned or paused new data centers. Pausing America's data center boom is one of the biggest gifts we could hand to China in the AI race. Brockovich: "And now we're looking at over 120 municipalities that have put on a pause, moratorium, or flat out get out. And then it is the cities like in California, Monterey Park city banned them. Amen. Cities are banning them. So you got the 14, 15 states, but inside those states, state by state, county by county, ban, pause, moratorium, and you've got over 120 municipalities now under pauses, moratoriums, or bans."

NEW: Erin Brockovich tells Theo Von that over 120 U.S. municipalities have now banned or paused new data centers. Pausing America's data center boom is one of the biggest gifts we could hand to China in the AI race. Brockovich: "And now we're looking at over 120 municipalities that have put on a pause, moratorium, or flat out get out. And then it is the cities like in California, Monterey Park city banned them. Amen. Cities are banning them. So you got the 14, 15 states, but inside those states, state by state, county by county, ban, pause, moratorium, and you've got over 120 municipalities now under pauses, moratoriums, or bans."

American Debunk

283,227 views • 15 hours ago

Kevin O'Leary just accused China of secretly funding every protest against AI in America. He says he has the proof and he's handing it to the FBI. The Shark Tank legend went on Diary of a CEO and dropped some INSANE revelations: He hired forensic auditors who traced IRS 990 filings from an organization called Arabella Advisors back to what he claims are Chinese-linked funding channels. He says he has 90 pages of IP addresses from foreign sources and his team is feeding data to government agents every four hours. His executives received death threats and the FBI visited the woman responsible at her home in Denver. O'Leary's claim is that China is deliberately funding dark money networks to stop American data center and power infrastructure from being built because every month America falls behind on compute is a month China gains ground with DeepSeek. And on the surface, the logic makes sense: China built 400 gigawatts of coal power in 19 months while America struggled to approve a single facility. If you're China and you can't outbuild America, the cheapest strategy is making sure America can't build at all. But here's what O'Leary didn't mention on the podcast... He is personally BUILDING a $100 billion data center in Utah called Stratos that would consume more electricity than the entire state. 40,000 acres across three sites, more than double the size of Manhattan, powered by 9 gigawatts of on-site natural gas generation. It would be the single largest data center ever proposed in America. And the residents of Box Elder County are trying to kill it. Hundreds packed a fairgrounds in Tremonton to protest but the commissioners voted to approve it anyway. Residents immediately launched a referendum campaign. O'Leary's response was to accuse 90% of the protesters of being paid actors coming from out of state. The Salt Lake Tribune investigated that claim and found it wasn't true. Then his OWN business partner walked back the China accusations. KSL reported last week that the Stratos team quietly shifted from claiming Chinese government funding to simply questioning where progressive nonprofits get their donations. FOX 13 reported that O'Leary had not released any of the documents he promised would prove the China connection. Meanwhile the groups he accused responded directly: Alliance for a Better Utah said "the only foreign interest in this data center is Kevin from Canada." Elevate Strategies posted a video saying "we are not Chinese foreign operatives" and that their opposition is about water, power, and the Great Salt Lake. So here's the reality that makes this story actually matter... Every major data center developer in America is about to face the same problem. Communities don't WANT these facilities. 7 in 10 Americans oppose local data center construction because energy costs are rising and water tables are dropping. Kevin O'Leary just showed the playbook for how they plan to deal with opposition. You don't debate the environmental concerns or negotiate with residents... You accuse anyone who pushes back of being a Chinese agent, wrap the entire project in a national security narrative, and make opposing a data center sound like treason. Because if the people fighting your project are patriots worried about their water and electricity bills, you have a problem. But if they're Chinese-funded saboteurs trying to DESTROY American AI dominance, you have a mandate. Every data center developer on Earth is watching Utah right now. If O'Leary's strategy works, the China accusation becomes the standard playbook for overriding local opposition everywhere. If the referendum succeeds, communities still have the power to say no. This is the template for how the AI infrastructure war gets fought in every state for the next decade. Kevin O'Leary probably spent a good amount of money to promote his narrative on Diary of a CEO.

Kevin O'Leary just accused China of secretly funding every protest against AI in America. He says he has the proof and he's handing it to the FBI. The Shark Tank legend went on Diary of a CEO and dropped some INSANE revelations: He hired forensic auditors who traced IRS 990 filings from an organization called Arabella Advisors back to what he claims are Chinese-linked funding channels. He says he has 90 pages of IP addresses from foreign sources and his team is feeding data to government agents every four hours. His executives received death threats and the FBI visited the woman responsible at her home in Denver. O'Leary's claim is that China is deliberately funding dark money networks to stop American data center and power infrastructure from being built because every month America falls behind on compute is a month China gains ground with DeepSeek. And on the surface, the logic makes sense: China built 400 gigawatts of coal power in 19 months while America struggled to approve a single facility. If you're China and you can't outbuild America, the cheapest strategy is making sure America can't build at all. But here's what O'Leary didn't mention on the podcast... He is personally BUILDING a $100 billion data center in Utah called Stratos that would consume more electricity than the entire state. 40,000 acres across three sites, more than double the size of Manhattan, powered by 9 gigawatts of on-site natural gas generation. It would be the single largest data center ever proposed in America. And the residents of Box Elder County are trying to kill it. Hundreds packed a fairgrounds in Tremonton to protest but the commissioners voted to approve it anyway. Residents immediately launched a referendum campaign. O'Leary's response was to accuse 90% of the protesters of being paid actors coming from out of state. The Salt Lake Tribune investigated that claim and found it wasn't true. Then his OWN business partner walked back the China accusations. KSL reported last week that the Stratos team quietly shifted from claiming Chinese government funding to simply questioning where progressive nonprofits get their donations. FOX 13 reported that O'Leary had not released any of the documents he promised would prove the China connection. Meanwhile the groups he accused responded directly: Alliance for a Better Utah said "the only foreign interest in this data center is Kevin from Canada." Elevate Strategies posted a video saying "we are not Chinese foreign operatives" and that their opposition is about water, power, and the Great Salt Lake. So here's the reality that makes this story actually matter... Every major data center developer in America is about to face the same problem. Communities don't WANT these facilities. 7 in 10 Americans oppose local data center construction because energy costs are rising and water tables are dropping. Kevin O'Leary just showed the playbook for how they plan to deal with opposition. You don't debate the environmental concerns or negotiate with residents... You accuse anyone who pushes back of being a Chinese agent, wrap the entire project in a national security narrative, and make opposing a data center sound like treason. Because if the people fighting your project are patriots worried about their water and electricity bills, you have a problem. But if they're Chinese-funded saboteurs trying to DESTROY American AI dominance, you have a mandate. Every data center developer on Earth is watching Utah right now. If O'Leary's strategy works, the China accusation becomes the standard playbook for overriding local opposition everywhere. If the referendum succeeds, communities still have the power to say no. This is the template for how the AI infrastructure war gets fought in every state for the next decade. Kevin O'Leary probably spent a good amount of money to promote his narrative on Diary of a CEO.

Ricardo

40,599 views • 1 month ago

Seattle Democrats have begun fining businesses for homeless encampments (This is real) “Who's to blame for homeless encampments on private property? If you’re Seattle, it’s not the homeless. It's not the city. It's property owners who should be punished.” Business owner goes out of town for a couple days, “and that's when 15 to 20 people moved into the parking lot. Those unhoused neighbors? Yeah, they kept doing drugs-drugs out in the open. Naturally, this generated a ton of complaints — since Seattle has made it difficult for property owners to remove encampments, Hawley called the cops. He then invested $30,000 more in a new perimeter fence, but for the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, this wasn't enough. The city sent him a letter of property violations that included unauthorized entry, litter, overgrown plants, and graffiti. For the first 10 days of non-compliance, penalties are $150 a day. After that, penalties increase to $500 per day for each violation. Penalties keep adding up” The city then begins charging the property owner fees to prove they’re in compliance “Of course, they also charge fees for the monitoring, but those depend on the condition of property at that time. A building with no violations still incurs a $332 fee. A building secured with violations totals $652, and a building open to entry is a $782 penalty, and since the state hasn't screwed you enough, they also charge a 5% technology fee.“

Seattle Democrats have begun fining businesses for homeless encampments (This is real) “Who's to blame for homeless encampments on private property? If you’re Seattle, it’s not the homeless. It's not the city. It's property owners who should be punished.” Business owner goes out of town for a couple days, “and that's when 15 to 20 people moved into the parking lot. Those unhoused neighbors? Yeah, they kept doing drugs-drugs out in the open. Naturally, this generated a ton of complaints — since Seattle has made it difficult for property owners to remove encampments, Hawley called the cops. He then invested $30,000 more in a new perimeter fence, but for the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, this wasn't enough. The city sent him a letter of property violations that included unauthorized entry, litter, overgrown plants, and graffiti. For the first 10 days of non-compliance, penalties are $150 a day. After that, penalties increase to $500 per day for each violation. Penalties keep adding up” The city then begins charging the property owner fees to prove they’re in compliance “Of course, they also charge fees for the monitoring, but those depend on the condition of property at that time. A building with no violations still incurs a $332 fee. A building secured with violations totals $652, and a building open to entry is a $782 penalty, and since the state hasn't screwed you enough, they also charge a 5% technology fee.“

Wall Street Apes

219,183 views • 10 months ago

Britain Sends India a £9 Million Parking Bill Britain has found a new way to collect dues from its former colonies—through parking fines. The Indian mission in London has been asked to pay over £9 million in congestion charges. The £15 daily fee applies to all vehicles in central London but under the Vienna Convention, diplomats are exempt from taxes. India says this is a tax, not a service. The UK disagrees. The dispute has now grown into a diplomatic standoff, with the U.S. and Japan backing India’s position. Together, they owe Britain more than £35 million. But none have paid. If you talk about owing then Britain owes a lot, the loot worth $45 trillion, antiques and artifacts , the Kohinoor that sits on the crown. Credit : First Post/Palki Sharma.

Britain Sends India a £9 Million Parking Bill Britain has found a new way to collect dues from its former colonies—through parking fines. The Indian mission in London has been asked to pay over £9 million in congestion charges. The £15 daily fee applies to all vehicles in central London but under the Vienna Convention, diplomats are exempt from taxes. India says this is a tax, not a service. The UK disagrees. The dispute has now grown into a diplomatic standoff, with the U.S. and Japan backing India’s position. Together, they owe Britain more than £35 million. But none have paid. If you talk about owing then Britain owes a lot, the loot worth $45 trillion, antiques and artifacts , the Kohinoor that sits on the crown. Credit : First Post/Palki Sharma.

Augadh

717,816 views • 11 months ago

VIDEO: Texas Gov. Abbott calls for regulations on data centers, contrasting previous stance FOX 4 NEWS ... AUSTIN, Texas - Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Wednesday called for sweeping regulations on data centers to be passed by the legislature in the 2027 session. It's a change in stance for Abbott, who previously worked to make Texas the epicenter of the data center buildout. In a letter to the Public Utilities Commission of Texas and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Abbot laid out his ideas to hold data centers accountable and ensure the costs of their growth are not passed on to taxpayers. Abbott called for new centers to add power generation to the state's power grid while paying for their own infrastructure costs and connection to the grid. The letter also calls for the mandated use of closed-loop water systems and annual reporting on electricity and water use by data centers. The governor is also calling on lawmakers to repeal sales tax exemptions and "other outdated or unnecessary incentives" for data centers. Data centers would also be required to consider the communities by reducing their impact through measures such as reducing noise. "As Texas continues to welcome innovation and investment, we must ensure that growth strengthens our people and their quality of life without placing undue burdens on Texans and local communities," Abbott wrote in the letter. In the letter, Abbott directed PUC and ERCOT to submit a joint memorandum by July 17 outlining actions they've taken to prevent risks and added costs to taxpayers because of data center development. At least one lawmaker applauded the move as state Rep. Helen Kerwin praised Abbott for "protecting Texas ratepayers." "As these projects are proposed across Texas, we must PROTECT our water resources, rural communities, and state parks while bringing greater transparency and accountability to the process," Kerwin said on X. Kerwin has come out against the explosive expansion of data centers in the past, calling for full impact studies before development. "Economic development matters. Innovation matters. Jobs matter. But our water and our power are not negotiable," she said in February. Cal Jillson, a political scientist, tells FOX 4's David Sentendrey that Abbott's recent comments are at odds with his past stance on data centers. "The Governor has worked very hard to make Texas the epicenter of the data center buildout," Jillson said. ERCOT delivered a warning in April that Texas power demand could quadruple by 2032, mostly driven by data centers, population increases and oil production. Jillson also believes Abbott, who is seeking re-election this November, sees the potential for political backlash for other Republican campaigns. "He is sitting on $130 million, he’s gonna win easily but he knows that there are some races down ticket. Maybe even the U.S. Senate race, certainly the Texas Railroad Commissioner race, which have weaker Republicans that he needs to worry about," Jillson continued. "He’s got to try to be sure that Republicans hold the Texas House and Senate by large margins. So that’s what he’s trying to do, just position the Republican Party more than himself so they’re not taking blame for the data center buildout." The move comes as communities and local leaders push back against the rapid expansion of data centers in the state. Last month, Hill County officials placed a moratorium on new data centers in their county. The move was met with a lawsuit from developers. Officials rescinded the moratorium last week in response to the pressure from the lawsuit and issued a checklist for new large-scale development in the county. The Angelina County Commissioners Court advised residents to contact state lawmakers during Tuesday night's meeting after hearing public comments about a proposed data center located outside the Lufkin city limits. "We have no authority to do a moratorium or to stop any type of development in the county," Angelina County Judge Keith Wright said. "The Texas legislators have consciously limited what we can do, and they've done it on purpose."

VIDEO: Texas Gov. Abbott calls for regulations on data centers, contrasting previous stance FOX 4 NEWS ... AUSTIN, Texas - Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Wednesday called for sweeping regulations on data centers to be passed by the legislature in the 2027 session. It's a change in stance for Abbott, who previously worked to make Texas the epicenter of the data center buildout. In a letter to the Public Utilities Commission of Texas and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Abbot laid out his ideas to hold data centers accountable and ensure the costs of their growth are not passed on to taxpayers. Abbott called for new centers to add power generation to the state's power grid while paying for their own infrastructure costs and connection to the grid. The letter also calls for the mandated use of closed-loop water systems and annual reporting on electricity and water use by data centers. The governor is also calling on lawmakers to repeal sales tax exemptions and "other outdated or unnecessary incentives" for data centers. Data centers would also be required to consider the communities by reducing their impact through measures such as reducing noise. "As Texas continues to welcome innovation and investment, we must ensure that growth strengthens our people and their quality of life without placing undue burdens on Texans and local communities," Abbott wrote in the letter. In the letter, Abbott directed PUC and ERCOT to submit a joint memorandum by July 17 outlining actions they've taken to prevent risks and added costs to taxpayers because of data center development. At least one lawmaker applauded the move as state Rep. Helen Kerwin praised Abbott for "protecting Texas ratepayers." "As these projects are proposed across Texas, we must PROTECT our water resources, rural communities, and state parks while bringing greater transparency and accountability to the process," Kerwin said on X. Kerwin has come out against the explosive expansion of data centers in the past, calling for full impact studies before development. "Economic development matters. Innovation matters. Jobs matter. But our water and our power are not negotiable," she said in February. Cal Jillson, a political scientist, tells FOX 4's David Sentendrey that Abbott's recent comments are at odds with his past stance on data centers. "The Governor has worked very hard to make Texas the epicenter of the data center buildout," Jillson said. ERCOT delivered a warning in April that Texas power demand could quadruple by 2032, mostly driven by data centers, population increases and oil production. Jillson also believes Abbott, who is seeking re-election this November, sees the potential for political backlash for other Republican campaigns. "He is sitting on $130 million, he’s gonna win easily but he knows that there are some races down ticket. Maybe even the U.S. Senate race, certainly the Texas Railroad Commissioner race, which have weaker Republicans that he needs to worry about," Jillson continued. "He’s got to try to be sure that Republicans hold the Texas House and Senate by large margins. So that’s what he’s trying to do, just position the Republican Party more than himself so they’re not taking blame for the data center buildout." The move comes as communities and local leaders push back against the rapid expansion of data centers in the state. Last month, Hill County officials placed a moratorium on new data centers in their county. The move was met with a lawsuit from developers. Officials rescinded the moratorium last week in response to the pressure from the lawsuit and issued a checklist for new large-scale development in the county. The Angelina County Commissioners Court advised residents to contact state lawmakers during Tuesday night's meeting after hearing public comments about a proposed data center located outside the Lufkin city limits. "We have no authority to do a moratorium or to stop any type of development in the county," Angelina County Judge Keith Wright said. "The Texas legislators have consciously limited what we can do, and they've done it on purpose."

David Sentendrey

62,561 views • 1 month ago

WOW! Tucker Carlson confronts Kevin O'Leary suggesting he paied off three county commissioners in Box Elder County Utah to build the world's largest Surveillance Center. O'Leary: We have to keep all of our tech ahead of China's, including data centers and everything else. But ultimately they are our adversary on our way of life. Carlson: Then can I ask our way of life? Right. So I would think since you disagree with the Chinese way of life which is pretty civilized in a lot of ways but the one way in which it's barbaric is that it grants its citizens no real rights. And so I would think that you would be very worried about aping their system which we are now doing. Like they have total surveillance. It's a panopticon in China. We should create our own. Let's take 40,000 acres in Utah and make it possible for the government to know where you are at all times and what you're thinking. Listening to you on your phone. Like we have that. O'Leary: You have to choose the the less of two evils in your scenario. And I'm telling you the the what you should do is say "I want Kevin O'Leary to succeed. I want him to beat the Chinese in compute power" and then then use the laws of the United States to make sure that you keep that compute power in check whichever way you want. But to not have it available to put down my shovel, I don't think people want me to do that. Even the people in Box Elder, the majority of them want me to hold my shovel and start digging. And that's basically the debate we're having. Carlson: How do you know? How do you know that? That the majority of... O'Leary: Because they voted for it unanimously before the Chinese guys... Carlson: There was a referendum dispatch like all this crap that's being spewed out. Hold on. I'm Yeah. And I may have fallen for some of it. So you corrected me. There was a referendum among citizens or did some like county board vote? O'Leary: We we actually went through the whole process that you have to do by their laws and were granted three to zero. They the the commissioners of the county said we want three people voted. The people of the county elected officials that's how you do it. Carlson: How hard is it for Kevin O'Leary and Amazon and Microsoft and Google to subvert three county commissioners in rural Utah? O'Leary: They vote. They wanted They asked us to come. They asked us to bring $15 billion. They asked and they voted and it was a three to zero vote. Carlson: That's how Google and Kevin O'Leary got three county commissioners in rural Utah on their side. Good work.

WOW! Tucker Carlson confronts Kevin O'Leary suggesting he paied off three county commissioners in Box Elder County Utah to build the world's largest Surveillance Center. O'Leary: We have to keep all of our tech ahead of China's, including data centers and everything else. But ultimately they are our adversary on our way of life. Carlson: Then can I ask our way of life? Right. So I would think since you disagree with the Chinese way of life which is pretty civilized in a lot of ways but the one way in which it's barbaric is that it grants its citizens no real rights. And so I would think that you would be very worried about aping their system which we are now doing. Like they have total surveillance. It's a panopticon in China. We should create our own. Let's take 40,000 acres in Utah and make it possible for the government to know where you are at all times and what you're thinking. Listening to you on your phone. Like we have that. O'Leary: You have to choose the the less of two evils in your scenario. And I'm telling you the the what you should do is say "I want Kevin O'Leary to succeed. I want him to beat the Chinese in compute power" and then then use the laws of the United States to make sure that you keep that compute power in check whichever way you want. But to not have it available to put down my shovel, I don't think people want me to do that. Even the people in Box Elder, the majority of them want me to hold my shovel and start digging. And that's basically the debate we're having. Carlson: How do you know? How do you know that? That the majority of... O'Leary: Because they voted for it unanimously before the Chinese guys... Carlson: There was a referendum dispatch like all this crap that's being spewed out. Hold on. I'm Yeah. And I may have fallen for some of it. So you corrected me. There was a referendum among citizens or did some like county board vote? O'Leary: We we actually went through the whole process that you have to do by their laws and were granted three to zero. They the the commissioners of the county said we want three people voted. The people of the county elected officials that's how you do it. Carlson: How hard is it for Kevin O'Leary and Amazon and Microsoft and Google to subvert three county commissioners in rural Utah? O'Leary: They vote. They wanted They asked us to come. They asked us to bring $15 billion. They asked and they voted and it was a three to zero vote. Carlson: That's how Google and Kevin O'Leary got three county commissioners in rural Utah on their side. Good work.

HighImpactFlix

10,572 views • 2 months ago

There’s been an enormous amount of misinformation surrounding our Utah data center project. Claims that we’re going to consume all of Utah’s electricity, drain the Great Salt Lake, or immediately build the world’s largest facility simply aren’t true. The reality is we’re building the project in phases, starting with a standard sized 1.5 gigawatt facility powered entirely by our own generation infrastructure not Utah’s grid. In fact, the goal is to eventually contribute power back into the local system to help stabilize energy costs. This project would create thousands of construction jobs, thousands more long term engineering and support jobs, and major tax revenue for Box Elder County over the next decade. We’re also going through every required process EPA approvals, water permits, air permits, noise compliance, and public review. What concerns me most is how aggressively misinformation has been amplified around power development projects across America. After conducting audits and reviewing IRS filings, we found organizations like Alliance for a Better Utah receiving funding through networks connected to Arabella and foreign linked money tied to Chinese interests. I’ve turned everything over to federal authorities because people deserve facts not fear campaigns when deciding the future of their communities.

There’s been an enormous amount of misinformation surrounding our Utah data center project. Claims that we’re going to consume all of Utah’s electricity, drain the Great Salt Lake, or immediately build the world’s largest facility simply aren’t true. The reality is we’re building the project in phases, starting with a standard sized 1.5 gigawatt facility powered entirely by our own generation infrastructure not Utah’s grid. In fact, the goal is to eventually contribute power back into the local system to help stabilize energy costs. This project would create thousands of construction jobs, thousands more long term engineering and support jobs, and major tax revenue for Box Elder County over the next decade. We’re also going through every required process EPA approvals, water permits, air permits, noise compliance, and public review. What concerns me most is how aggressively misinformation has been amplified around power development projects across America. After conducting audits and reviewing IRS filings, we found organizations like Alliance for a Better Utah receiving funding through networks connected to Arabella and foreign linked money tied to Chinese interests. I’ve turned everything over to federal authorities because people deserve facts not fear campaigns when deciding the future of their communities.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

231,317 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Google caught lying about building a Data Center in San Jose, California Google is creating a massive new “research facility — Google insists is not a data center” But a retired engineer looked at their blue prints and documents and proves it’s a data center “When I looked at the city documents, they did not list it as a data center. They listed it as a large energy user — and I said, no, this is a data center because when you look at the drawings, you see the building is full of server racks And 250 megawatts, 500,000 square feet almost, that's about 500 watts per square foot. Once you put that much energy into a building, you can't put people in there. There's no room for people there. When that much energy has to only go into equipment, and then cooling. The plans show the 2 buildings filled with uniform columns of equipment and large cooling towers. But the real tip-off was the proposed power substation on the site. 250 megawatts, more than 2.5 times bigger than any data center proposal currently on the books with the city of San Jose” He “thinks the city may be purposely looking the other way when it comes to their own regulations. I think that they're trying to bypass the rest of the environmental review so they don't have to go through looking at energy use, water consumption, noise, and other environmental impacts” “Simply because they're not calling it a data center?” “Yeah.” I looked it up and if Google intentionally mislabeled the project, it’s criminal False Statements / Fraud in Permitting: Submitting materially false or misleading information in land-use applications, environmental documents or under penalty of perjury can violate: - Local San Jose municipal code for zoning/permitting violations - California Government Code or Penal Code sections on false statements to public officials. - Potential perjury if declarations were sworn Environmental Law Violations: Deliberately evading CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review by misclassification could lead to accusations of misleading the public agency, which has both civil and criminal angles if it involves willful deception It city workers knew and officials “purposely looked the other way,” it could implicate bribery, conflict of interest and official misconduct statutes This isn’t victimless. it undermines democratic planning processes, environmental protections, and fair competition for other developers who follow the rules ALL should be brought up on criminal charges This is actually a felony If executives knowingly approved the deception, law enforcement should pursue felony charges against the corporation and responsible individuals

🚨 Google caught lying about building a Data Center in San Jose, California Google is creating a massive new “research facility — Google insists is not a data center” But a retired engineer looked at their blue prints and documents and proves it’s a data center “When I looked at the city documents, they did not list it as a data center. They listed it as a large energy user — and I said, no, this is a data center because when you look at the drawings, you see the building is full of server racks And 250 megawatts, 500,000 square feet almost, that's about 500 watts per square foot. Once you put that much energy into a building, you can't put people in there. There's no room for people there. When that much energy has to only go into equipment, and then cooling. The plans show the 2 buildings filled with uniform columns of equipment and large cooling towers. But the real tip-off was the proposed power substation on the site. 250 megawatts, more than 2.5 times bigger than any data center proposal currently on the books with the city of San Jose” He “thinks the city may be purposely looking the other way when it comes to their own regulations. I think that they're trying to bypass the rest of the environmental review so they don't have to go through looking at energy use, water consumption, noise, and other environmental impacts” “Simply because they're not calling it a data center?” “Yeah.” I looked it up and if Google intentionally mislabeled the project, it’s criminal False Statements / Fraud in Permitting: Submitting materially false or misleading information in land-use applications, environmental documents or under penalty of perjury can violate: - Local San Jose municipal code for zoning/permitting violations - California Government Code or Penal Code sections on false statements to public officials. - Potential perjury if declarations were sworn Environmental Law Violations: Deliberately evading CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review by misclassification could lead to accusations of misleading the public agency, which has both civil and criminal angles if it involves willful deception It city workers knew and officials “purposely looked the other way,” it could implicate bribery, conflict of interest and official misconduct statutes This isn’t victimless. it undermines democratic planning processes, environmental protections, and fair competition for other developers who follow the rules ALL should be brought up on criminal charges This is actually a felony If executives knowingly approved the deception, law enforcement should pursue felony charges against the corporation and responsible individuals

Wall Street Apes

90,503 views • 4 days ago

Charlie Sheen reveals he only did 8 episodes at his record TV salary, blew through a giant line of credit, then sold his Two and a Half Men back-end to wipe the debt and gave away all his residuals “Based on choices that I made during anger management, I came to this place where everybody thinks that, oh, cuz that contract and all this. I think I only did eight episodes at that fee. At that fee, that crazy fee, okay, which is still more than anyone deserves.” “And so I had a crooked business manager at the time and I said, I haven't felt rich. I want to feel rich. I've never felt like actually like rich.” “So, I want to buy an airplane, you know? He's like, 'Well, no, just charter.' I'm like, 'No, no, no. I got to I can buy half of this one airplane.' And he's like, 'The front or the back?' I'm like, 'Fuck off.'” “And then lived like a rockstar, a billionaire. Yeah. And loved it until..” “I got to tell Monica, he was spending 15 to $30,000 a day on crack.” “And it came time to pay off that line of credit and the only asset I had was my back end on Two and a Half, which would pay in increments a little bit every quarterly.” “Six people had their hands in it.” “And so I chose to not be held hostage by the bank and just sold that and paid that and just wiped the slate.” “I was like let's just make that go away.”

Charlie Sheen reveals he only did 8 episodes at his record TV salary, blew through a giant line of credit, then sold his Two and a Half Men back-end to wipe the debt and gave away all his residuals “Based on choices that I made during anger management, I came to this place where everybody thinks that, oh, cuz that contract and all this. I think I only did eight episodes at that fee. At that fee, that crazy fee, okay, which is still more than anyone deserves.” “And so I had a crooked business manager at the time and I said, I haven't felt rich. I want to feel rich. I've never felt like actually like rich.” “So, I want to buy an airplane, you know? He's like, 'Well, no, just charter.' I'm like, 'No, no, no. I got to I can buy half of this one airplane.' And he's like, 'The front or the back?' I'm like, 'Fuck off.'” “And then lived like a rockstar, a billionaire. Yeah. And loved it until..” “I got to tell Monica, he was spending 15 to $30,000 a day on crack.” “And it came time to pay off that line of credit and the only asset I had was my back end on Two and a Half, which would pay in increments a little bit every quarterly.” “Six people had their hands in it.” “And so I chose to not be held hostage by the bank and just sold that and paid that and just wiped the slate.” “I was like let's just make that go away.”

Hribi

1,412,277 views • 28 days ago

My dear friends, we all see how Ukrainians are ready to quickly unite for great goals. The collection for the "core" of Mr. Oleg Horohovsky, who showed how quickly funds can be accumulated when there is proper communication and strong support. But along with such large-scale initiatives, there are collections that are not publicized, but save real lives. The Charitable Foundation "Center for Complex Endoprosthesis, Osteointegration and Bionics" has been collecting 15 million hryvnias for a month for titanium implants and rehabilitation of eight veterans. We work every day to ensure that they can walk again, live a full life and have a future. Mr. Oleg, you suggested returning donations to those who did not like the collection format. We appeal to you and to everyone who made contributions: transfer these funds to real help to those who need it now. If you are not ready to support financially, then at least with information - your vote can be decisive in raising the necessary 15 million and changing the lives of eight defenders. Helping is important. But helping in a way that the result is felt by those who gave their health for us. Collection link details: PayPal: tytanovi.paypal@gmail.com Thank you to everyone who supports!

My dear friends, we all see how Ukrainians are ready to quickly unite for great goals. The collection for the "core" of Mr. Oleg Horohovsky, who showed how quickly funds can be accumulated when there is proper communication and strong support. But along with such large-scale initiatives, there are collections that are not publicized, but save real lives. The Charitable Foundation "Center for Complex Endoprosthesis, Osteointegration and Bionics" has been collecting 15 million hryvnias for a month for titanium implants and rehabilitation of eight veterans. We work every day to ensure that they can walk again, live a full life and have a future. Mr. Oleg, you suggested returning donations to those who did not like the collection format. We appeal to you and to everyone who made contributions: transfer these funds to real help to those who need it now. If you are not ready to support financially, then at least with information - your vote can be decisive in raising the necessary 15 million and changing the lives of eight defenders. Helping is important. But helping in a way that the result is felt by those who gave their health for us. Collection link details: PayPal: [email protected] Thank you to everyone who supports!

Вячеслав Запорожец

22,537 views • 1 year ago

🚨 HATE CRIME? Racist White man with AR-15 and body armor OPENS FIRE on Black family Reunion gathering after shouting slurs In Leesburg, Lee County, Georgia, on Sunday, a family was having a gathering when Jeffrey Tyler Kinzer leaned out of a car and started hurling racial slurs at them. Minutes later he returned on foot wearing body armor and carrying an AR-15-style rifle, then opened fire on the group. The family says it was a clear racially motivated attack. Kinzer was shot by a 62 year old Marine veteran who stated he wanted to protect roughly 20 children at the gathering. Sheriff’s Office says it started as a verbal altercation, but witnesses confirm the racial slurs. More charges are expected. Another white man geared up like he was going to war against a Black family.

🚨 HATE CRIME? Racist White man with AR-15 and body armor OPENS FIRE on Black family Reunion gathering after shouting slurs In Leesburg, Lee County, Georgia, on Sunday, a family was having a gathering when Jeffrey Tyler Kinzer leaned out of a car and started hurling racial slurs at them. Minutes later he returned on foot wearing body armor and carrying an AR-15-style rifle, then opened fire on the group. The family says it was a clear racially motivated attack. Kinzer was shot by a 62 year old Marine veteran who stated he wanted to protect roughly 20 children at the gathering. Sheriff’s Office says it started as a verbal altercation, but witnesses confirm the racial slurs. More charges are expected. Another white man geared up like he was going to war against a Black family.

i Expose Racists & Pedos

1,690,302 views • 1 month ago

Investigation exposes the hidden cost of data centers, “It’s in your electric bill” “Companies like Amazon and META striking secret deals with utilities. It's all proprietary. It's all behind non-disclosure agreements and blacked out documents, and lobbying for a system that leaves all of us footing their bill” “The big problem is that we're all subsidizing the wealthiest corporations in the world in their pursuit of artificial intelligence.Americans' utility bills are rising while Big Tech's profits are going through the roof” “Everyday people covering the power costs of the data center build out.” “In 2025, the tech industry is expected to spend about $475 billion on data centers up 42% since last year. Today, data centers make up about 4% of US electricity demand. In just the next three years, that's expected to triple. The United States has never generated more electricity in our history than we are today.” “He explained to me that when utilities have to pay a higher capacity price, they pass it on to consumers in the form of supply charges. According to the PJM's independent monitor, data centers were responsible for 63% of last year's price increase. We saw customers with bills $900 over $1,000. It's unfathomable that they are having to pay higher rates to support wealthy corporations building data centers.” “The basic idea is that utility builds something and you socialize the costs to all of the ratepayers that have no choice but to take that utilities service. The cost of new infrastructure mostly shows up on another part of your electric bill, sometimes called delivery charges. Utility companies are allowed to set those charges high enough to recoup every dollar they spent building, plus a regulated rate of profit, usually around 10%. So this is a huge profit opportunity.” “Last year, a utility company in Louisiana proposed to spend $3 billion on a new power plant to meet electricity demand from a Meta data center. The full terms of its deal with Meta are secret, but redacted regulatory filings have revealed that the public is on the hook for Meta's power plant. Meta has signed a 15-year deal and it only obligates them to pay for about half of that $3 to $4 billion of infrastructure, which means that there's a big risk that everyone else in Louisiana will get stuck with the rest of that bill”

Investigation exposes the hidden cost of data centers, “It’s in your electric bill” “Companies like Amazon and META striking secret deals with utilities. It's all proprietary. It's all behind non-disclosure agreements and blacked out documents, and lobbying for a system that leaves all of us footing their bill” “The big problem is that we're all subsidizing the wealthiest corporations in the world in their pursuit of artificial intelligence.Americans' utility bills are rising while Big Tech's profits are going through the roof” “Everyday people covering the power costs of the data center build out.” “In 2025, the tech industry is expected to spend about $475 billion on data centers up 42% since last year. Today, data centers make up about 4% of US electricity demand. In just the next three years, that's expected to triple. The United States has never generated more electricity in our history than we are today.” “He explained to me that when utilities have to pay a higher capacity price, they pass it on to consumers in the form of supply charges. According to the PJM's independent monitor, data centers were responsible for 63% of last year's price increase. We saw customers with bills $900 over $1,000. It's unfathomable that they are having to pay higher rates to support wealthy corporations building data centers.” “The basic idea is that utility builds something and you socialize the costs to all of the ratepayers that have no choice but to take that utilities service. The cost of new infrastructure mostly shows up on another part of your electric bill, sometimes called delivery charges. Utility companies are allowed to set those charges high enough to recoup every dollar they spent building, plus a regulated rate of profit, usually around 10%. So this is a huge profit opportunity.” “Last year, a utility company in Louisiana proposed to spend $3 billion on a new power plant to meet electricity demand from a Meta data center. The full terms of its deal with Meta are secret, but redacted regulatory filings have revealed that the public is on the hook for Meta's power plant. Meta has signed a 15-year deal and it only obligates them to pay for about half of that $3 to $4 billion of infrastructure, which means that there's a big risk that everyone else in Louisiana will get stuck with the rest of that bill”

Wall Street Apes

138,820 views • 10 months ago

🚨Is the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors about to DEFUND school resource officers to fund more DEI? At a March 2nd meeting, Supervisor Juli Briskman told the county’s DEI department that she hopes the board will not fund a large resource request (elementary SROs), and if that happens, other budget requests like more DEI positions could be funded. The County Administrator already included funding in the proposed budget to fund school resource officers in elementary schools, something Briskman opposes as do most Democrats on the school board like April Chandler and Anne Donohue. On Thursday at 5:15 pm, the Loudoun County School Board is holding a special meeting and is expected to vote on the Sheriff’s proposal to add school resource officers in all elementary schools. Right now, the Democrat majority on the school board is expected to formally oppose the SRO proposal. We’ll keep you updated. Some believe this is being done now so Democrats on the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, like Briskman, can make the argument to take the SRO funding out of the county’s proposed budget. “Why fund elementary school SROs if the school board doesn’t want them?” Right now, there are school resource officers in all middle and high schools in Loudoun County. The Sheriff says the county needs school resource officers in elementary schools because of how many calls of service there are at elementary schools and he says SRO’s can protect the most vulnerable kids in the county when seconds count. Elementary school shootings have been on the rise over the past ten years. The sheriff’s office also tells me there are hundreds of instances where SROs have had to leave middle schools to respond to threats at elementary schools each year. The sheriff’s office was told by the school admin last year that if they want school resource officers in elementary schools, they should get the funding first, and then LCPS will talk. But now it appears the school board is moving the goal posts. The sheriff’s office was able to get the funding, but now there’s an effort underway by Briskman and some school board members to pull the funding and prevent school resource officers in elementary schools.

🚨Is the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors about to DEFUND school resource officers to fund more DEI? At a March 2nd meeting, Supervisor Juli Briskman told the county’s DEI department that she hopes the board will not fund a large resource request (elementary SROs), and if that happens, other budget requests like more DEI positions could be funded. The County Administrator already included funding in the proposed budget to fund school resource officers in elementary schools, something Briskman opposes as do most Democrats on the school board like April Chandler and Anne Donohue. On Thursday at 5:15 pm, the Loudoun County School Board is holding a special meeting and is expected to vote on the Sheriff’s proposal to add school resource officers in all elementary schools. Right now, the Democrat majority on the school board is expected to formally oppose the SRO proposal. We’ll keep you updated. Some believe this is being done now so Democrats on the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, like Briskman, can make the argument to take the SRO funding out of the county’s proposed budget. “Why fund elementary school SROs if the school board doesn’t want them?” Right now, there are school resource officers in all middle and high schools in Loudoun County. The Sheriff says the county needs school resource officers in elementary schools because of how many calls of service there are at elementary schools and he says SRO’s can protect the most vulnerable kids in the county when seconds count. Elementary school shootings have been on the rise over the past ten years. The sheriff’s office also tells me there are hundreds of instances where SROs have had to leave middle schools to respond to threats at elementary schools each year. The sheriff’s office was told by the school admin last year that if they want school resource officers in elementary schools, they should get the funding first, and then LCPS will talk. But now it appears the school board is moving the goal posts. The sheriff’s office was able to get the funding, but now there’s an effort underway by Briskman and some school board members to pull the funding and prevent school resource officers in elementary schools.

Nick Minock

27,869 views • 4 months ago