正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

POLYMARKET TRADING BOTS COLLAPSED Remember those names? > a4385 > Account88888 > CRYINGLITTLEBABY > PurpleThunderBicycleMountain They are NOT active anymore. Last trade for each of them was two weeks ago. Some of them suffered major losses before disappearing. The reason? 15-minute fees. Looks like they decided to keep trading...

DextersSolab's profile picture

Dexter's Lab

11,274 subscribers

22,318 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Polymarket bots don’t need millions anymore to print money Someone came up with Polymarket bot for low balance traders He was flying under the radar, bot I found him I was digging through top bot and ran into something unusual A bot that isn’t loud, isn’t big, and isn’t flex volume “SilverKestrel” - only 84 profile views, no one see him That alone tells you it was doing a good job staying invisible - first trade was on Dec 30 - deposited just $600 Since then, it’s already pulled in about $1,200 in profit That’s 200%+ profit on balance At that pace, flipping $600 to $60k isn’t crazy at all What makes this bot interesting is what it *isn’t* - It’s not a whale - It doesn’t swing size - It runs around $800 in position value No spam trades. No huge volume. Just clean execution THE SETUP IS SIMPLE - fastest bot atm - 15 min Crypto markets - BTC and ETH only Most importantly - hiding in plain sight Bitcoin markets are flooded with bots Everyone watches the big wallets and high PnL accounts A small bot doesn’t draw attention there. That’s how it stays silent Polymarket bots don’t all need millions anymore to make huge profits With the right speed and market choice, even a low-balance setup can quietly compound Feels like the start of a new era Something tells me that now you can use bots with just $1000 on balance and make huge profits wallet:
0:33

Polymarket bots don’t need millions anymore to print money Someone came up with Polymarket bot for low balance traders He was flying under the radar, bot I found him I was digging through top bot and ran into something unusual A bot that isn’t loud, isn’t big, and isn’t flex volume “SilverKestrel” - only 84 profile views, no one see him That alone tells you it was doing a good job staying invisible - first trade was on Dec 30 - deposited just $600 Since then, it’s already pulled in about $1,200 in profit That’s 200%+ profit on balance At that pace, flipping $600 to $60k isn’t crazy at all What makes this bot interesting is what it *isn’t* - It’s not a whale - It doesn’t swing size - It runs around $800 in position value No spam trades. No huge volume. Just clean execution THE SETUP IS SIMPLE - fastest bot atm - 15 min Crypto markets - BTC and ETH only Most importantly - hiding in plain sight Bitcoin markets are flooded with bots Everyone watches the big wallets and high PnL accounts A small bot doesn’t draw attention there. That’s how it stays silent Polymarket bots don’t all need millions anymore to make huge profits With the right speed and market choice, even a low-balance setup can quietly compound Feels like the start of a new era Something tells me that now you can use bots with just $1000 on balance and make huge profits wallet:

gavelsv.patron

98,786 次观看 • 9 个月前

GROK BOT MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,353 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Grok Bot took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. I named it Cabal. Started with $20, then $70, then $140, then $320, then $2,353 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.
0:35

GROK BOT MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,353 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Grok Bot took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. I named it Cabal. Started with $20, then $70, then $140, then $320, then $2,353 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.

Archive

280,527 次观看 • 1 个月前

Polymarket front run bot Spent the last month building the backend for this bot which essentially acts the same way that high frequency trading bots work in the stock market It waits for a market buy order to come through where there is thin liquidity in the order book meaning their market buy will push the price up of a YES/NO contract meaning that if my bot buys the contracts first then I can sell them at the high price to the market buy order before their orders have gone through Prediction markets are still early enough to find opportunities like this, just like how the early days of stock trading similar bots to this were invented It is essentially an arbitrage strategy, will make the bot public and free to a few people tomorrow so turn on notifications so you don’t miss it
1:54

Polymarket front run bot Spent the last month building the backend for this bot which essentially acts the same way that high frequency trading bots work in the stock market It waits for a market buy order to come through where there is thin liquidity in the order book meaning their market buy will push the price up of a YES/NO contract meaning that if my bot buys the contracts first then I can sell them at the high price to the market buy order before their orders have gone through Prediction markets are still early enough to find opportunities like this, just like how the early days of stock trading similar bots to this were invented It is essentially an arbitrage strategy, will make the bot public and free to a few people tomorrow so turn on notifications so you don’t miss it

Ethan

72,110 次观看 • 9 个月前

Polymarket added fees so most arbitrage bots died. Devs who spent months building strategies watched their edge disappear in one update. But a small group figured out how to stay profitable anyway. This wallet is making $27,000 every single day right now. $743,000 in 35 days. 31,566 predictions. Fully automated. And it is running the exact same strategy i broke down in my previous article. His wallet: < Here is exactly how it works and why fees didn't kill it: The bot trades crypto Up/Down markets across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP simultaneously. Not randomly. With surgical precision on timing and entry price. Look at the realized moves: Bitcoin position turned $2,300 into $8,260. XRP position turned $10,105 into $22,100. Ethereum position turned $1,347 into $10,950. Those are not lucky trades. That is a system firing correctly at scale. The reason fees didn't destroy this bot is the same reason i explained before. Pure speed arbitrage bots died because their edge was margin - and fees ate the margin completely. This bot doesn't rely on tiny spread captures. It combines pair-sum arbitrage with precise entry timing to find windows where combined price is cheap enough that fees still leave meaningful profit on the table. The math only works at specific entry prices and specific timing windows. Most bots can't find those windows fast enough. This one can because the infrastructure is fast enough to compete. $27,000 per day from a strategy that survived the fee update while everyone else shut down. That is not luck. That is being technically ahead of the competition. The gap between bots that died and bots that kept printing was never the strategy. It was execution quality and infrastructure speed.
0:22

Polymarket added fees so most arbitrage bots died. Devs who spent months building strategies watched their edge disappear in one update. But a small group figured out how to stay profitable anyway. This wallet is making $27,000 every single day right now. $743,000 in 35 days. 31,566 predictions. Fully automated. And it is running the exact same strategy i broke down in my previous article. His wallet: < Here is exactly how it works and why fees didn't kill it: The bot trades crypto Up/Down markets across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP simultaneously. Not randomly. With surgical precision on timing and entry price. Look at the realized moves: Bitcoin position turned $2,300 into $8,260. XRP position turned $10,105 into $22,100. Ethereum position turned $1,347 into $10,950. Those are not lucky trades. That is a system firing correctly at scale. The reason fees didn't destroy this bot is the same reason i explained before. Pure speed arbitrage bots died because their edge was margin - and fees ate the margin completely. This bot doesn't rely on tiny spread captures. It combines pair-sum arbitrage with precise entry timing to find windows where combined price is cheap enough that fees still leave meaningful profit on the table. The math only works at specific entry prices and specific timing windows. Most bots can't find those windows fast enough. This one can because the infrastructure is fast enough to compete. $27,000 per day from a strategy that survived the fee update while everyone else shut down. That is not luck. That is being technically ahead of the competition. The gap between bots that died and bots that kept printing was never the strategy. It was execution quality and infrastructure speed.

Punisher

34,222 次观看 • 5 个月前

Somewhere in Amsterdam in a small office sit 3 people quant. HFT engineer. risk manager. for years they ran bots on Binance and Bybit but it's a bloodbath there thousands of teams just like them then one of them opened Polymarket and saw that regular people bet on 15-min Bitcoin markets based on vibes they created a wallet deposited $10k ran the bot on micro-volume collecting logs, fixing bugs, testing the model when they knew they were ready poured in $200k bot started doing 618 trades per day first came a $20k drawdown then every day +$30-50k bot is connected to Binance and ChainLink via WebSocket sees BTC move in milliseconds and reacts before Polymarket 17 days later $588,925 profit copying trades through PolyCop
0:20

Somewhere in Amsterdam in a small office sit 3 people quant. HFT engineer. risk manager. for years they ran bots on Binance and Bybit but it's a bloodbath there thousands of teams just like them then one of them opened Polymarket and saw that regular people bet on 15-min Bitcoin markets based on vibes they created a wallet deposited $10k ran the bot on micro-volume collecting logs, fixing bugs, testing the model when they knew they were ready poured in $200k bot started doing 618 trades per day first came a $20k drawdown then every day +$30-50k bot is connected to Binance and ChainLink via WebSocket sees BTC move in milliseconds and reacts before Polymarket 17 days later $588,925 profit copying trades through PolyCop

Archive

21,139 次观看 • 7 个月前

CLAUDE MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,503 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Claude took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. Started with $1, then $5, then $10, then $50, then $2,503 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.
0:35

CLAUDE MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,503 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Claude took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. Started with $1, then $5, then $10, then $50, then $2,503 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.

zostaff

1,951,025 次观看 • 6 个月前

Bro, this is actually kinda stupid I started with $89. Didn’t add a single dollar after that. Then I gave the setup to 6 Grok agents and let them trade $CATE. → $89 starting balance → $55,698.17 this morning at 6 AM And the weird part? $CATE was basically dead for almost 10 hours. → Market cap: $79M → $85M → Most swings: under 3% → 9 intraday trades → +$1,475.74 profit Then the evening session started. Same bots. Same rules. → 8 more trades → +$6,274.26 profit Best trade: → Bought around $90.5M → Sold around $106.7M → 30 minutes → +$2,055.88 Not every trade worked either. The bots chased 4 pumps. → 4 losses → -$717.30 total I kept those losses in because that’s the point. The system wasn’t trying to look perfect. It just followed the rules. And while $CATE was barely moving, the backend had 8 prediction bets running too. → 8 prediction bets → +$3,616.61 One of them: “Anthropic won’t IPO this year.” → Entry: 45.5¢ → 3 hours later: 96.8¢ The risk difference was wild. → Coin trade risk: $5,878 → Prediction risk: $756 → Still made roughly a third of the profit Previous round: → $11,366.61 profit → +25.64% in 20 hours Meanwhile $CATE itself only moved: → +13.66% That’s what got me. The bots didn’t need one huge pump. They just kept trading the movement. 6 Grok agents, each with one job: → 1 scans the market → 1 sizes positions → 1 executes buys → 1 logs side bets → 1 blocks bad chase entries → Only 1 coin position open at once If the setup disappears, they exit. If it comes back, they enter again. Humans remember the last trade. Bots don’t care. They just ask: “Is the setup still there?” I wrote the whole setup down. link: Prompts, position rules, bot roles, entry logic, exit logic, breakpoints. Want it? Comment “JEVPUS” and follow me.
0:25

Bro, this is actually kinda stupid I started with $89. Didn’t add a single dollar after that. Then I gave the setup to 6 Grok agents and let them trade $CATE. → $89 starting balance → $55,698.17 this morning at 6 AM And the weird part? $CATE was basically dead for almost 10 hours. → Market cap: $79M → $85M → Most swings: under 3% → 9 intraday trades → +$1,475.74 profit Then the evening session started. Same bots. Same rules. → 8 more trades → +$6,274.26 profit Best trade: → Bought around $90.5M → Sold around $106.7M → 30 minutes → +$2,055.88 Not every trade worked either. The bots chased 4 pumps. → 4 losses → -$717.30 total I kept those losses in because that’s the point. The system wasn’t trying to look perfect. It just followed the rules. And while $CATE was barely moving, the backend had 8 prediction bets running too. → 8 prediction bets → +$3,616.61 One of them: “Anthropic won’t IPO this year.” → Entry: 45.5¢ → 3 hours later: 96.8¢ The risk difference was wild. → Coin trade risk: $5,878 → Prediction risk: $756 → Still made roughly a third of the profit Previous round: → $11,366.61 profit → +25.64% in 20 hours Meanwhile $CATE itself only moved: → +13.66% That’s what got me. The bots didn’t need one huge pump. They just kept trading the movement. 6 Grok agents, each with one job: → 1 scans the market → 1 sizes positions → 1 executes buys → 1 logs side bets → 1 blocks bad chase entries → Only 1 coin position open at once If the setup disappears, they exit. If it comes back, they enter again. Humans remember the last trade. Bots don’t care. They just ask: “Is the setup still there?” I wrote the whole setup down. link: Prompts, position rules, bot roles, entry logic, exit logic, breakpoints. Want it? Comment “JEVPUS” and follow me.

winkle.

13,215 次观看 • 15 天前

You’ll never make money with Polymarket bots until you understand this The best bots aren’t predicting outcomes. They’re executing market structure Most Polymakret traders show up thinking automation equals profit If I automate my picks, I’ll print IN REALITY Without an execution edge, your bot just becomes exit liquidity for people who already have one Yes, money is real Millions have been extracted from Polymarket via arbitrage over the past year But it goes to a very small group running systematic strategies, not prediction engines HERE IS WHAT ACTUALLY METTER 1. Trade the order book, not your opinions Polymarket runs a real CLOB It’s designed for market makers. If your bot isn’t reading and reacting to the book, you’re already behind 2. You need real devs, not vibe coders Orders aren’t just send trade They’re structured, hashed, signed There’s a reason Polymarket recommends client libraries. Doing this wrong is expensive 3. Real operations WebSockets drop, rate limits hit Fills come partial If you’re not monitoring 24/7 with alerts and kill switches, the market will babysit you instead 4. Risk rules Most bots die from slippage, inventory imbalance, regime shifts, and pretending something “looks profitable” means it’s executable Every bot has a ceiling Others copy it. Spreads tighten. Edge compresses You patch, redeploy, retune, repeat Bot “ca6859f” #1 by number of trades - over 42k predictions - $268k PnL - 7 months live It doesn’t predict direction. It hunts brief mispricings and keeps YES+NO under $1 over time He was one of the first who understood the rules of this game and quietly print money every day THAT IS THE TRUTH If your bot is making predictions you’re not building a trading system You’re automating gambling Market loves gamblers. They provide volume For someone else To be the best, study the best !
0:44

You’ll never make money with Polymarket bots until you understand this The best bots aren’t predicting outcomes. They’re executing market structure Most Polymakret traders show up thinking automation equals profit If I automate my picks, I’ll print IN REALITY Without an execution edge, your bot just becomes exit liquidity for people who already have one Yes, money is real Millions have been extracted from Polymarket via arbitrage over the past year But it goes to a very small group running systematic strategies, not prediction engines HERE IS WHAT ACTUALLY METTER 1. Trade the order book, not your opinions Polymarket runs a real CLOB It’s designed for market makers. If your bot isn’t reading and reacting to the book, you’re already behind 2. You need real devs, not vibe coders Orders aren’t just send trade They’re structured, hashed, signed There’s a reason Polymarket recommends client libraries. Doing this wrong is expensive 3. Real operations WebSockets drop, rate limits hit Fills come partial If you’re not monitoring 24/7 with alerts and kill switches, the market will babysit you instead 4. Risk rules Most bots die from slippage, inventory imbalance, regime shifts, and pretending something “looks profitable” means it’s executable Every bot has a ceiling Others copy it. Spreads tighten. Edge compresses You patch, redeploy, retune, repeat Bot “ca6859f” #1 by number of trades - over 42k predictions - $268k PnL - 7 months live It doesn’t predict direction. It hunts brief mispricings and keeps YES+NO under $1 over time He was one of the first who understood the rules of this game and quietly print money every day THAT IS THE TRUTH If your bot is making predictions you’re not building a trading system You’re automating gambling Market loves gamblers. They provide volume For someone else To be the best, study the best !

gavelsv.patron

13,751 次观看 • 9 个月前

DAY 282 Over the last 4 weeks, thousands of new people started following me, especially artists, producers, managers, and creatives from the music industry. A lot of them told me the same thing: “I got into music because of the art. I stayed because I realized the business decides everything.” You do NOT need an MBA to win in music. But you do need to understand two things: The music business is a modern Game of Thrones. You must build yourself into the strongest direct-to-consumer brand in the world. The artists who understand distribution, ownership, leverage, narrative, audience, and platform dynamics will own the future. That’s why I keep making these videos.
4:54

DAY 282 Over the last 4 weeks, thousands of new people started following me, especially artists, producers, managers, and creatives from the music industry. A lot of them told me the same thing: “I got into music because of the art. I stayed because I realized the business decides everything.” You do NOT need an MBA to win in music. But you do need to understand two things: The music business is a modern Game of Thrones. You must build yourself into the strongest direct-to-consumer brand in the world. The artists who understand distribution, ownership, leverage, narrative, audience, and platform dynamics will own the future. That’s why I keep making these videos.

Eric Jackson

16,330 次观看 • 4 个月前

Qullamaggie on His Friends That Started Trading With Him “Yeah, some of them. Some of them started up. You know some of them tried trading unsuccessfully. Two of my friends actually started trading; they traded for like a year, but yeah they didn’t have much success. They could have had success if they had stuck to it, but they got bored and they thought, you know, everyone thinks. You know, but it takes years and years and years, and that’s really the only difference between successful traders and unsuccessful traders. Because the successful ones don’t give up. They stick with it even if they blow up. They come back; they go back to trading. That’s what I did several times. I could just I could have just given up and you know finished my studies and gone to work. You know, worked at a regular job. And now I make as much money in a year that I would have made in a lifetime having a regular job. So dropping out of school was the best decision I’ve ever made. The funny thing is most of my friends don’t really know how much; how successful I am. Like they think I’m making like as much money as I would in a normal job.”
1:13

Qullamaggie on His Friends That Started Trading With Him “Yeah, some of them. Some of them started up. You know some of them tried trading unsuccessfully. Two of my friends actually started trading; they traded for like a year, but yeah they didn’t have much success. They could have had success if they had stuck to it, but they got bored and they thought, you know, everyone thinks. You know, but it takes years and years and years, and that’s really the only difference between successful traders and unsuccessful traders. Because the successful ones don’t give up. They stick with it even if they blow up. They come back; they go back to trading. That’s what I did several times. I could just I could have just given up and you know finished my studies and gone to work. You know, worked at a regular job. And now I make as much money in a year that I would have made in a lifetime having a regular job. So dropping out of school was the best decision I’ve ever made. The funny thing is most of my friends don’t really know how much; how successful I am. Like they think I’m making like as much money as I would in a normal job.”

Lone

37,714 次观看 • 11 个月前

I gave Claude Fable 5 just $100 to test the simplest arbitrage. Left my laptop opened for 24 hours. Session PnL: clean $1,571.66 On Polymarket, YES + NO Aren't there thousands of arbitrage bots already? Absolutely. You're not competing against people. You're competing against infrastructure. The biggest improvement wasn't a new strategy. It was rebuilding the entire execution pipeline. The bot runs on a VPS close to the APIs it talks to instead of my local machine. It keeps persistent connections open instead of reconnecting every request. Market metadata is cached in memory so it only refreshes live prices. Orders are prepared before the opportunity exists. When YES + NO finally drops below $1, there's almost nothing left to calculate. It checks liquidity, order book and submits both legs immediately. Will that beat firms spending millions on low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. It doesn't have to. There are hundreds of active prediction markets, constant volatility and plenty of opportunities that last long enough for a well-engineered bot to compete. That's probably the biggest thing Claude Fable 5 changed for me. I stopped asking it to build me a trading bot and started asking where am I wasting milliseconds. That single shift made the bot noticeably more competitive than any new trading strategy I could have invented. Arbitrage is the king. Irt lives everywhere. The only question is are you ready to study it. Leaving a full build + latency tips guide below this post.
0:46

I gave Claude Fable 5 just $100 to test the simplest arbitrage. Left my laptop opened for 24 hours. Session PnL: clean $1,571.66 On Polymarket, YES + NO Aren't there thousands of arbitrage bots already? Absolutely. You're not competing against people. You're competing against infrastructure. The biggest improvement wasn't a new strategy. It was rebuilding the entire execution pipeline. The bot runs on a VPS close to the APIs it talks to instead of my local machine. It keeps persistent connections open instead of reconnecting every request. Market metadata is cached in memory so it only refreshes live prices. Orders are prepared before the opportunity exists. When YES + NO finally drops below $1, there's almost nothing left to calculate. It checks liquidity, order book and submits both legs immediately. Will that beat firms spending millions on low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. It doesn't have to. There are hundreds of active prediction markets, constant volatility and plenty of opportunities that last long enough for a well-engineered bot to compete. That's probably the biggest thing Claude Fable 5 changed for me. I stopped asking it to build me a trading bot and started asking where am I wasting milliseconds. That single shift made the bot noticeably more competitive than any new trading strategy I could have invented. Arbitrage is the king. Irt lives everywhere. The only question is are you ready to study it. Leaving a full build + latency tips guide below this post.

Oracle Boar

18,091 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump just said California Democrats are "CHEATING LIKE DOGS" after Spencer Pratt's loss But then they CALLED it for Steve Hilton to avoid an uproar "You can't cheat like they did. And look at the election in California as an example. After a week, they determined that the candidate who's leading and had all the mojo, all of a sudden he doesn't make the runoff!" "I started talking about Steve Hilton, who's a fantastic guy. And I saw them say it was going to be two weeks before they knew. And I started hitting them. It's going to happen to Steve Hilton too!" "You got to watch. And they approved Steve Hilton very quickly." "They didn't want to. There was too much heat on him. The only reason he got approved, he had all the votes he needed, probably to be first place." "But the only reason they approved Steve Hilton was going to be two weeks. They said it. And then they approved it that night because the heat was on them because they're cheating dogs." "And you can't have a great country when that happens." PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT
1:10

🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump just said California Democrats are "CHEATING LIKE DOGS" after Spencer Pratt's loss But then they CALLED it for Steve Hilton to avoid an uproar "You can't cheat like they did. And look at the election in California as an example. After a week, they determined that the candidate who's leading and had all the mojo, all of a sudden he doesn't make the runoff!" "I started talking about Steve Hilton, who's a fantastic guy. And I saw them say it was going to be two weeks before they knew. And I started hitting them. It's going to happen to Steve Hilton too!" "You got to watch. And they approved Steve Hilton very quickly." "They didn't want to. There was too much heat on him. The only reason he got approved, he had all the votes he needed, probably to be first place." "But the only reason they approved Steve Hilton was going to be two weeks. They said it. And then they approved it that night because the heat was on them because they're cheating dogs." "And you can't have a great country when that happens." PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT

Eric Daugherty

378,506 次观看 • 4 个月前

A bot pulled $294K in one month with something I have never seen a 100% win rate. I scrolled through 5,000 trades looking for one loss. Could not find it. 100%. Not 99.5. Not "almost perfect." Actual, literal, every single trade green. CRYINGLITTLEBABY does not play the same game as other bots. They enter at the start of a window, read momentum, guess direction. This one waits. → Account: The 15-minute BTC window opens. He watches. Does nothing. Five minutes pass. BTC drops hard on spot. The move is real. But Polymarket still shows DOWN at 25 cents. Now he enters. The bet is not "will BTC go down?" The bet is "BTC already went down and the odds have not caught up yet." By the time the window closes, he is paid $1 for something he bought at 20-30 cents. Not because he predicted anything. Because he waited until predicting was unnecessary. The treemap broke my brain a little. Solid green. A full month of trading and not one red tile. I kept scrolling thinking I would find it hiding somewhere. Nothing. The edge is patience. Other bots race to enter first. This one lets them fight, watches the result, and collects what is left. A month of trading. Zero losses. Just a wall of green proving that sometimes the best prediction is no prediction at all.
1:07

A bot pulled $294K in one month with something I have never seen a 100% win rate. I scrolled through 5,000 trades looking for one loss. Could not find it. 100%. Not 99.5. Not "almost perfect." Actual, literal, every single trade green. CRYINGLITTLEBABY does not play the same game as other bots. They enter at the start of a window, read momentum, guess direction. This one waits. → Account: The 15-minute BTC window opens. He watches. Does nothing. Five minutes pass. BTC drops hard on spot. The move is real. But Polymarket still shows DOWN at 25 cents. Now he enters. The bet is not "will BTC go down?" The bet is "BTC already went down and the odds have not caught up yet." By the time the window closes, he is paid $1 for something he bought at 20-30 cents. Not because he predicted anything. Because he waited until predicting was unnecessary. The treemap broke my brain a little. Solid green. A full month of trading and not one red tile. I kept scrolling thinking I would find it hiding somewhere. Nothing. The edge is patience. Other bots race to enter first. This one lets them fight, watches the result, and collects what is left. A month of trading. Zero losses. Just a wall of green proving that sometimes the best prediction is no prediction at all.

Blaze

272,625 次观看 • 9 个月前

This guy built a trading bot on Polymarket with an average trade size of $8 Result: +$251,218 His bot trades 5 and 15 minute crypto Up/Down markets using a hybrid of directional trading, latency edge, and dynamic hedging: 1. It looks for edge using its own model It tracks momentum, acceleration, order flow imbalance, and spot feeds relative to the reference price of the current market Based on this data, it constantly recalculates its own fair value for Up and Down. It enters a position when it detects mispricing 2. When the signal changes, it quickly adjusts its exposure If momentum reverses, it can reduce the existing side or start accumulating the opposite outcome In 86.2% of markets, it traded both sides. The dynamic hedge constantly adjusts net exposure based on the model’s latest signal It’s Polymarket nickname: nj23adsknml3 Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this app: It’s stats: > Trades / active hour: 516 > Average trade: $8.13 > Win Rate: 49% The main edge of this guy’s HFT algorithm comes from speed. It tries to detect changes in fair value on external crypto markets before they are reflected in Polymarket prices It then captures the temporary mispricing and quickly adjusts its directional exposure with every new market move
0:28

This guy built a trading bot on Polymarket with an average trade size of $8 Result: +$251,218 His bot trades 5 and 15 minute crypto Up/Down markets using a hybrid of directional trading, latency edge, and dynamic hedging: 1. It looks for edge using its own model It tracks momentum, acceleration, order flow imbalance, and spot feeds relative to the reference price of the current market Based on this data, it constantly recalculates its own fair value for Up and Down. It enters a position when it detects mispricing 2. When the signal changes, it quickly adjusts its exposure If momentum reverses, it can reduce the existing side or start accumulating the opposite outcome In 86.2% of markets, it traded both sides. The dynamic hedge constantly adjusts net exposure based on the model’s latest signal It’s Polymarket nickname: nj23adsknml3 Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this app: It’s stats: > Trades / active hour: 516 > Average trade: $8.13 > Win Rate: 49% The main edge of this guy’s HFT algorithm comes from speed. It tries to detect changes in fair value on external crypto markets before they are reflected in Polymarket prices It then captures the temporary mispricing and quickly adjusts its directional exposure with every new market move

VALIX

370,823 次观看 • 1 个月前

This fandom continues to be disappointing. They trend BTS is 7 and BTS only has Army when in fact Taehyung only has his loyal fans. When the surprise drop of LMA and RD came out, the previous song already had been out for 4 weeks. Army decided that a 4 week old song still was the priority and playlists not only consisted of the 4 week old song but the song’s remixes. Only 2 weeks after RD AND LMA dropped a new remix dropped for the now 6 week old song. Army advised the 6 week old song should still be prioritized and increased. When Layover dropped the priority still was not Taehyung. Several threads from Army stating the newly dropped album would increase the now 8 week old song. Fans were then gaslit by Army saying this happens every time a new album comes out, old songs increase. But guess who songs didn’t increase when the latest album came out? Taehyung. 3 weeks after the release of Layover a new song emerged. The priority again is not Taehyung. Army wants to not only chart the new song but to keep the now 11 week old song at the top. When fans asked for a recomeback for Layover they were told it was already done and it’s now time for a member’s birthday and the goals were to increase a 28 week old song higher than 4 week old Layover. You might be thinking what recomeback was done because you didn’t notice. Well, it came in the form of asking for 200 screen shots and they called it a day. Is Kim Taehyung a part of BTS? This was his 1st album. His debut! Why was he never the priority from a fandom that claims to love all 7. Keep streaming! Keep supporting Layover TAEHYUNG HAS ONLY KTHS #Layoverto1B
0:45

This fandom continues to be disappointing. They trend BTS is 7 and BTS only has Army when in fact Taehyung only has his loyal fans. When the surprise drop of LMA and RD came out, the previous song already had been out for 4 weeks. Army decided that a 4 week old song still was the priority and playlists not only consisted of the 4 week old song but the song’s remixes. Only 2 weeks after RD AND LMA dropped a new remix dropped for the now 6 week old song. Army advised the 6 week old song should still be prioritized and increased. When Layover dropped the priority still was not Taehyung. Several threads from Army stating the newly dropped album would increase the now 8 week old song. Fans were then gaslit by Army saying this happens every time a new album comes out, old songs increase. But guess who songs didn’t increase when the latest album came out? Taehyung. 3 weeks after the release of Layover a new song emerged. The priority again is not Taehyung. Army wants to not only chart the new song but to keep the now 11 week old song at the top. When fans asked for a recomeback for Layover they were told it was already done and it’s now time for a member’s birthday and the goals were to increase a 28 week old song higher than 4 week old Layover. You might be thinking what recomeback was done because you didn’t notice. Well, it came in the form of asking for 200 screen shots and they called it a day. Is Kim Taehyung a part of BTS? This was his 1st album. His debut! Why was he never the priority from a fandom that claims to love all 7. Keep streaming! Keep supporting Layover TAEHYUNG HAS ONLY KTHS #Layoverto1B

CloverTheHENRY

98,418 次观看 • 2 年前

➤ I almost quit trading. ➤ Not just because I was losing… but because I wasn’t getting the same value other traders were getting. ➤ It felt like I was doing everything right, but still falling behind. ➤ Then I realized something: ➤ Most traders aren’t just making money from trades… they’re earning from their activity. ➤ Every trade. Every referral. Every bit of volume, it all adds up. ➤ That’s exactly what’s happening on Yetch ➤ So how do traders really win in 2026? ➤ They stop relying only on profits… and start earning while they trade. ➤ Yetch is a trading terminal that gives back up to 20% of its profits to active users. ➤ While most platforms quietly take from you with fees, this one rewards you for showing up. ➤ And if you don’t have time to trade yourself, there’s a sniper bot that can execute opportunities for you. ➤ That’s when i realized it. ➤ This isn’t just trading anymore. ➤ This might be a goldmine. ➤ Let’s dig deeper. 🧵
1:57

➤ I almost quit trading. ➤ Not just because I was losing… but because I wasn’t getting the same value other traders were getting. ➤ It felt like I was doing everything right, but still falling behind. ➤ Then I realized something: ➤ Most traders aren’t just making money from trades… they’re earning from their activity. ➤ Every trade. Every referral. Every bit of volume, it all adds up. ➤ That’s exactly what’s happening on Yetch ➤ So how do traders really win in 2026? ➤ They stop relying only on profits… and start earning while they trade. ➤ Yetch is a trading terminal that gives back up to 20% of its profits to active users. ➤ While most platforms quietly take from you with fees, this one rewards you for showing up. ➤ And if you don’t have time to trade yourself, there’s a sniper bot that can execute opportunities for you. ➤ That’s when i realized it. ➤ This isn’t just trading anymore. ➤ This might be a goldmine. ➤ Let’s dig deeper. 🧵

0xJedi | Legion

12,449 次观看 • 6 个月前

For those who don’t understand WTF is happening in the US: The people standing outside the fence/gate are the workers that were previously screwed over and paid less than they were told, and their prices inflated at the company store Then, a whole new crop of workers show up and start working for what they think will be okay money Then, the company does the same thing to them, cut the wages and increase the prices at the company store (inflation) Then when those people get upset, they all get kicked out and replaced with a whole new wave of workers Wash, rinse, repeat None of what you’re seeing today with illegals and indians is new, they’re just the new workers here to replace you and keep counterfeit debt ponzi dollars alive Until you understand how money works this will continue, over and over… just like it has for centuries
1:05

For those who don’t understand WTF is happening in the US: The people standing outside the fence/gate are the workers that were previously screwed over and paid less than they were told, and their prices inflated at the company store Then, a whole new crop of workers show up and start working for what they think will be okay money Then, the company does the same thing to them, cut the wages and increase the prices at the company store (inflation) Then when those people get upset, they all get kicked out and replaced with a whole new wave of workers Wash, rinse, repeat None of what you’re seeing today with illegals and indians is new, they’re just the new workers here to replace you and keep counterfeit debt ponzi dollars alive Until you understand how money works this will continue, over and over… just like it has for centuries

Financial Physics

20,682 次观看 • 4 个月前

The simplest arb bot on Claude Opus 5 made +$1,847 PnL in one day. And it used just one strategy: Buying YES + NO Market metadata being rebuilt every loop > API requests waiting on each other > Orders being created only after spread appeared > Functions doing work they didn't need to do None of those changes made the strategy smarter. They made it faster. Now the bot keeps market metadata cached in memory. Orders are prepared before the opportunity exists. Multiple markets are scanned concurrently instead of one by one. When YES + NO finally drops below $1, the bot isn't thinking anymore. It's simply executing. That's probably the biggest lesson I've learned building arbitrage bots. Most developers ask Claude: "Can you build me a trading strategy?" But here's momething no one will tell you... Much better prompt is: "Pretend you're a low-latency engineer and find every millisecond I'm wasting" That prompt improved my bot more than any new trading idea I've tried. You can try it today but make sure to add my arb guides into a memory of your new project. This will help claude undertsand the concept and fail less. Thank me later, next update on Wednesday space as always.
0:50

The simplest arb bot on Claude Opus 5 made +$1,847 PnL in one day. And it used just one strategy: Buying YES + NO Market metadata being rebuilt every loop > API requests waiting on each other > Orders being created only after spread appeared > Functions doing work they didn't need to do None of those changes made the strategy smarter. They made it faster. Now the bot keeps market metadata cached in memory. Orders are prepared before the opportunity exists. Multiple markets are scanned concurrently instead of one by one. When YES + NO finally drops below $1, the bot isn't thinking anymore. It's simply executing. That's probably the biggest lesson I've learned building arbitrage bots. Most developers ask Claude: "Can you build me a trading strategy?" But here's momething no one will tell you... Much better prompt is: "Pretend you're a low-latency engineer and find every millisecond I'm wasting" That prompt improved my bot more than any new trading idea I've tried. You can try it today but make sure to add my arb guides into a memory of your new project. This will help claude undertsand the concept and fail less. Thank me later, next update on Wednesday space as always.

Oracle Boar

19,970 次观看 • 2 个月前

Polymarket vs Binance BTC charts are DIFFERENT A millisecond gap generates $100k daily for bots Those who noticed it are quietly printing THOUSANDS Open APIs + ClawdBot = a 24/7 goldmine Here’s what you didn’t know about 5-minute markets: (and how you can use it too) Stream 1-second Binance spot and watch 5-minute BTC markets on Polymarket side by side. You’ll notice something most manual traders miss. When BTC makes a sharp impulse on Binance, Polymarket doesn’t reprice in the same millisecond. It reacts slightly later. For a brief window, spot has already broken structure, but the 5-minute UP/DOWN market still sits around 0.45-0.55 like nothing happened. Orderbook inertia. Human reaction time. UI lag. That gap is the edge. By the time manual traders process the move, click, sign, and confirm, odds already shifted to $0.75. ClawdBots and other automated systems print thousands without predicting direction. They stream Binance tick data in real time and detect micro-impulses on the 1-second level. Then simply hit Polymarket while pricing still reflects the previous state. Some even structure entries on both sides under $1 total to cap downside if volatility snaps back. Near expiry, they rebalance toward the dominant move once probability converges. Over thousands of cycles, milliseconds compound. Take a look at this trader: He makes ~$20k / day trading these markets. Total PnL: $1.6M in two months. Manual traders compete on opinion. Automated systems compete on timing. And timing wins. Check 5 min markets yourself: Trading just entered a new era.
0:26

Polymarket vs Binance BTC charts are DIFFERENT A millisecond gap generates $100k daily for bots Those who noticed it are quietly printing THOUSANDS Open APIs + ClawdBot = a 24/7 goldmine Here’s what you didn’t know about 5-minute markets: (and how you can use it too) Stream 1-second Binance spot and watch 5-minute BTC markets on Polymarket side by side. You’ll notice something most manual traders miss. When BTC makes a sharp impulse on Binance, Polymarket doesn’t reprice in the same millisecond. It reacts slightly later. For a brief window, spot has already broken structure, but the 5-minute UP/DOWN market still sits around 0.45-0.55 like nothing happened. Orderbook inertia. Human reaction time. UI lag. That gap is the edge. By the time manual traders process the move, click, sign, and confirm, odds already shifted to $0.75. ClawdBots and other automated systems print thousands without predicting direction. They stream Binance tick data in real time and detect micro-impulses on the 1-second level. Then simply hit Polymarket while pricing still reflects the previous state. Some even structure entries on both sides under $1 total to cap downside if volatility snaps back. Near expiry, they rebalance toward the dominant move once probability converges. Over thousands of cycles, milliseconds compound. Take a look at this trader: He makes ~$20k / day trading these markets. Total PnL: $1.6M in two months. Manual traders compete on opinion. Automated systems compete on timing. And timing wins. Check 5 min markets yourself: Trading just entered a new era.

Oracle Boar

43,454 次观看 • 7 个月前