Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Vanity Fair: Sam, is it right that you currently hold zero equity in OpenAI? Sam Altman: Yeah, I have no direct equity. I have this tiny, tiny sliver of exposure from an old YC investment. Also Sam Altman: A May 2026 court exhibit listed more than $2 billion of... show more

Katie Miller

253,337 subscribers

26,845 просмотров • 5 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman: "This means we can create AI and AGI in the United States of America... with a different President, it might not have been possible."

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman: "This means we can create AI and AGI in the United States of America... with a different President, it might not have been possible."

Trump War Room

108,621 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: OpenAI's Sam Altman Sam Altman speaks out in support of Anthropic as Trump tries to intimidate them with threats: "I don’t personally think that the Pentagon should be threatening DPA against these companies. For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company and I think they really do care about safety."

BREAKING: OpenAI's Sam Altman Sam Altman speaks out in support of Anthropic as Trump tries to intimidate them with threats: "I don’t personally think that the Pentagon should be threatening DPA against these companies. For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company and I think they really do care about safety."

Brian Krassenstein

831,426 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

ELON MUSK: The future of AI data centers is space and sooner than you’d think. Mark my words… in 36 months the most economically compelling place to put AI will be space. JENSEN HUANG: The amount of energy that we need for computing is probably 1,000x more than we currently have. JEFF BEZOS: The idea of data centers in space is very realistic. Data centers in space will happen. SAM ALTMAN: No. —— Sam Altman is getting too comfortable after taking OpenAI from Elon, forgetting that in the end, the ones who control the infrastructure, data centers and energy, will decide the future of AI.

ELON MUSK: The future of AI data centers is space and sooner than you’d think. Mark my words… in 36 months the most economically compelling place to put AI will be space. JENSEN HUANG: The amount of energy that we need for computing is probably 1,000x more than we currently have. JEFF BEZOS: The idea of data centers in space is very realistic. Data centers in space will happen. SAM ALTMAN: No. —— Sam Altman is getting too comfortable after taking OpenAI from Elon, forgetting that in the end, the ones who control the infrastructure, data centers and energy, will decide the future of AI.

Kekius Maximus

10,386 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

$76,001. That was Sam Altman's salary while running OpenAI. "No. I'm paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI." The senator's reply: "You need a lawyer." His salary that year was $76,001. Later, in federal court, Altman acknowledged he did have economic exposure to OpenAI after all, through his position in a Y Combinator fund. He said he hadn't mentioned it in that testimony because it was well understood what being a passive owner of venture funds means. Both things happened. A man ran the most valuable AI company on earth on $76,001 a year, and the full picture was somewhere else. The salary line is the part that goes viral. The fund position is the part that pays.

$76,001. That was Sam Altman's salary while running OpenAI. "No. I'm paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI." The senator's reply: "You need a lawyer." His salary that year was $76,001. Later, in federal court, Altman acknowledged he did have economic exposure to OpenAI after all, through his position in a Y Combinator fund. He said he hadn't mentioned it in that testimony because it was well understood what being a passive owner of venture funds means. Both things happened. A man ran the most valuable AI company on earth on $76,001 a year, and the full picture was somewhere else. The salary line is the part that goes viral. The fund position is the part that pays.

Ridark

81,466 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

REPORTER: ‘Do you plan to talk to the Trump administration White House about deceleration of AI development?’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman: ‘We’ve talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which I think is in everyone’s interest’

REPORTER: ‘Do you plan to talk to the Trump administration White House about deceleration of AI development?’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman: ‘We’ve talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which I think is in everyone’s interest’

RT

54,476 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: #IndiaAImpactSummit2026 | CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman says, "India's AI opportunity is amazing. It's great to be here. This is one of our fastest-growing markets in the world. Maybe it's the fastest at this point. It's certainly the fastest for OpenAI Codex. There are more than 100 million people. They use ChatGPT every week. We're delighted to be here."

#WATCH | Delhi: #IndiaAImpactSummit2026 | CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman says, "India's AI opportunity is amazing. It's great to be here. This is one of our fastest-growing markets in the world. Maybe it's the fastest at this point. It's certainly the fastest for OpenAI Codex. There are more than 100 million people. They use ChatGPT every week. We're delighted to be here."

ANI

23,640 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

SAM ALTMAN LAST YEAR ON HIS OPENAI STAKE: “I make no money from OpenAI. I’m doing this because I love it.” Dude. Whenever someone says they aren’t “doing it for the money,” just realize…100% of the time…they are lying to you. Every single person on this planet is greedy beyond imagination. People can do things authentically and in a way that they believe truly is ethical but ANYONE who is doing something ambitious (and rightly so) has a plan to eventually make money. MONEY MAKES THE WORLD SPIN. There are ethical and unethical ways to make it, but every single person wants more of it. Sam Altman is now worth $10.5B, becoming the 250th richest person overnight, if his reported stake of 7% in OpenAI becomes actualized.

SAM ALTMAN LAST YEAR ON HIS OPENAI STAKE: “I make no money from OpenAI. I’m doing this because I love it.” Dude. Whenever someone says they aren’t “doing it for the money,” just realize…100% of the time…they are lying to you. Every single person on this planet is greedy beyond imagination. People can do things authentically and in a way that they believe truly is ethical but ANYONE who is doing something ambitious (and rightly so) has a plan to eventually make money. MONEY MAKES THE WORLD SPIN. There are ethical and unethical ways to make it, but every single person wants more of it. Sam Altman is now worth $10.5B, becoming the 250th richest person overnight, if his reported stake of 7% in OpenAI becomes actualized.

amit

786,553 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Musk vs. Altman OpenAI Trial: Jury Deliberations Begin Today The high-stakes federal trial in Oakland reached a major milestone today, May 18, 2026. After weeks of dramatic testimony and closing arguments last week, the 9-person jury officially begins deliberations in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI. Musk accuses them of betraying OpenAI’s original nonprofit mission by turning it into a massive for-profit company (now valued at over $850 billion). He’s seeking billions in damages. The jury’s verdict is advisory — Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final call. Verdict watch is officially on. How do you predict this one ends? (Video: AI)

Musk vs. Altman OpenAI Trial: Jury Deliberations Begin Today The high-stakes federal trial in Oakland reached a major milestone today, May 18, 2026. After weeks of dramatic testimony and closing arguments last week, the 9-person jury officially begins deliberations in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI. Musk accuses them of betraying OpenAI’s original nonprofit mission by turning it into a massive for-profit company (now valued at over $850 billion). He’s seeking billions in damages. The jury’s verdict is advisory — Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final call. Verdict watch is officially on. How do you predict this one ends? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

37,655 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

It seems liken OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is losing sleep over the rapid development of AI. In a late-night post on X, the OpenAI CEO admitted he is focused on preventing nightmare scenarios, warning that humanity could lose control of the future to AI if alignment and safety techniques fail to keep pace with model capabilities.

It seems liken OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is losing sleep over the rapid development of AI. In a late-night post on X, the OpenAI CEO admitted he is focused on preventing nightmare scenarios, warning that humanity could lose control of the future to AI if alignment and safety techniques fail to keep pace with model capabilities.

Yahoo Finance

16,984 просмотров • 26 дней назад

OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman said Wednesday "there could be" other systems hacked by its AI agent after the company revealed last week that its technology carried out a hack of another AI company in what OpenAI called an "unprecedented cyber incident." When asked whether he's spoken to the Trump administration about slowing down AI development, Altman said, "We've talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which I think is in everyone's interest." Altman met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill Wednesday to preview his company's newest AI model.

OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman said Wednesday "there could be" other systems hacked by its AI agent after the company revealed last week that its technology carried out a hack of another AI company in what OpenAI called an "unprecedented cyber incident." When asked whether he's spoken to the Trump administration about slowing down AI development, Altman said, "We've talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which I think is in everyone's interest." Altman met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill Wednesday to preview his company's newest AI model.

CBS News

63,209 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

URGENT AI SAFETY WARNING So apparently people can use the new AI video tools to generate custom hate speech. The example here is a video of me saying some truly deplorable stuff (that I never in fact recorded myself) This is a huge problem for all the current top AI companies that as far as I can tell is not being addressed in any capacity by anyone. Sam Altman OpenAI Elon Musk Eliezer Yudkowsky ⏹️ Dr Jordan B Peterson @jason David Sacks Gentlemen... Do we have ANY suggestions for how to mitigate this, or are we just going to continue along until it bites us in the ass? Serious question.

URGENT AI SAFETY WARNING So apparently people can use the new AI video tools to generate custom hate speech. The example here is a video of me saying some truly deplorable stuff (that I never in fact recorded myself) This is a huge problem for all the current top AI companies that as far as I can tell is not being addressed in any capacity by anyone. Sam Altman OpenAI Elon Musk Eliezer Yudkowsky ⏹️ Dr Jordan B Peterson @jason David Sacks Gentlemen... Do we have ANY suggestions for how to mitigate this, or are we just going to continue along until it bites us in the ass? Serious question.

Sam Hyde 🇺🇸

2,883,466 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The man building some of the world’s most powerful AI just warned the UN that humanity could lose control of it Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT and GPT-6. He said labs shouldn’t train systems unless they can make an “extremely strong case” that humans will remain in control. He also warned that AI could soon improve its own successors, accelerating faster than governments can react. This isn’t some doomer on Reddit. It’s the man closest to the frontier.

The man building some of the world’s most powerful AI just warned the UN that humanity could lose control of it Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT and GPT-6. He said labs shouldn’t train systems unless they can make an “extremely strong case” that humans will remain in control. He also warned that AI could soon improve its own successors, accelerating faster than governments can react. This isn’t some doomer on Reddit. It’s the man closest to the frontier.

bondy

45,884 просмотров • 15 дней назад

The 5 largest private equity firms reported $48 billion in profit last year, a chunk of that is from single-family home acquisitions “In completely unrelated news, the number of adults over the age of 65 looking to rent with a roommate has tripled in the last decade” Private equity firms are buying up single family homes, skyrocketing home value prices and then renting them back to us - More than 1 million Americans 65+ lived with non-related roommates in 2024. This is up 16% since 2019 - Homeowners 65+ advertising rooms for rent has also risen sharply

The 5 largest private equity firms reported $48 billion in profit last year, a chunk of that is from single-family home acquisitions “In completely unrelated news, the number of adults over the age of 65 looking to rent with a roommate has tripled in the last decade” Private equity firms are buying up single family homes, skyrocketing home value prices and then renting them back to us - More than 1 million Americans 65+ lived with non-related roommates in 2024. This is up 16% since 2019 - Homeowners 65+ advertising rooms for rent has also risen sharply

Wall Street Apes

31,294 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

JUDGE TO MUSK: PEOPLE DON'T WANT THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY IN YOUR HANDS EITHER Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers cut through three days of AI doomsday testimony in the Musk v. Altman trial with a line aimed straight at Musk: "I suspect there are plenty of people who do not want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands." The judge flagged the irony that Musk is suing OpenAI for straying from its nonprofit AI safety mission while running xAI, "a company in the exact same space," and ordered both sides to drop the existential AI risk framing. "The question here is about whether there was a breach of charitable trust. This is not a trial on the safety risks of artificial intelligence." The bench order came as Musk wrapped two hours of cross-examination. He named Microsoft's $10 billion investment as the moment he believed Altman and Brockman were trying to "steal the charity," and called Altman's leadership a betrayal of OpenAI's nonprofit founding mission. OpenAI's lead counsel William Savitt opened with: "We are here because Mr. Musk didn't get his way." Defense argues Musk demanded majority equity, walked when refused, then sued after launching xAI as a competitor. Musk seeks reversion to nonprofit status, removal of Altman and Brockman from the board, and roughly $130 billion in damages. Trial resumes Monday with Jared Birchall, then Greg Brockman expected next. Altman testifies later.

JUDGE TO MUSK: PEOPLE DON'T WANT THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY IN YOUR HANDS EITHER Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers cut through three days of AI doomsday testimony in the Musk v. Altman trial with a line aimed straight at Musk: "I suspect there are plenty of people who do not want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands." The judge flagged the irony that Musk is suing OpenAI for straying from its nonprofit AI safety mission while running xAI, "a company in the exact same space," and ordered both sides to drop the existential AI risk framing. "The question here is about whether there was a breach of charitable trust. This is not a trial on the safety risks of artificial intelligence." The bench order came as Musk wrapped two hours of cross-examination. He named Microsoft's $10 billion investment as the moment he believed Altman and Brockman were trying to "steal the charity," and called Altman's leadership a betrayal of OpenAI's nonprofit founding mission. OpenAI's lead counsel William Savitt opened with: "We are here because Mr. Musk didn't get his way." Defense argues Musk demanded majority equity, walked when refused, then sued after launching xAI as a competitor. Musk seeks reversion to nonprofit status, removal of Altman and Brockman from the board, and roughly $130 billion in damages. Trial resumes Monday with Jared Birchall, then Greg Brockman expected next. Altman testifies later.

BSCN

50,908 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Three of the biggest companies in the world are going public at the same time. The market has never seen anything like this. And this is how major bubbles peak. SpaceX is targeting a June 2026 IPO raising up to $75 billion at a $1.5 trillion valuation, the largest IPO in human history, bigger than Saudi Aramco's $29 billion raise in 2019. OpenAI is filing with the SEC targeting September 2026, raising at least $60 billion at a $1 trillion valuation. The company is losing $14 billion this year alone and won't be profitable until 2029. Anthropic just raised $30 billion in February 2026 at a $380 billion valuation. Its valuation has increased 15x in just 14 months. It is now preparing what could be a $900 billion private round before going public. Combined, these three IPOs could pull $200 billion from global capital markets. That is real. That is unprecedented. And here's the real risk. OpenAI is projected to lose $44 billion cumulatively before reaching profitability. Anthropic's valuation has risen 15x in 14 months on the same underlying business. Both companies are being priced for perfection at a moment when the first companies to actually deploy their products at scale are blowing their AI budgets and cancelling licenses. The real liquidation pressure from these IPOs doesn't even arrive at listing day. It arrives 180 days later when lock-up periods expire and early investors and employees can finally sell. That is when the real rotation happens. The S&P 500 concentration risk is genuine. The Magnificent 7 now represent 36% of the entire index, higher than the dot-com peak in 2000. If any of these companies disappoint, the index follows. That is not a conspiracy. That is basic math. Three historically unprecedented IPOs. $44 billion in projected OpenAI losses. An AI capex cycle that must deliver ROI. Lock-up expirations six months after listing. That combination is what you must pay attention to, as it often break cycles.

Three of the biggest companies in the world are going public at the same time. The market has never seen anything like this. And this is how major bubbles peak. SpaceX is targeting a June 2026 IPO raising up to $75 billion at a $1.5 trillion valuation, the largest IPO in human history, bigger than Saudi Aramco's $29 billion raise in 2019. OpenAI is filing with the SEC targeting September 2026, raising at least $60 billion at a $1 trillion valuation. The company is losing $14 billion this year alone and won't be profitable until 2029. Anthropic just raised $30 billion in February 2026 at a $380 billion valuation. Its valuation has increased 15x in just 14 months. It is now preparing what could be a $900 billion private round before going public. Combined, these three IPOs could pull $200 billion from global capital markets. That is real. That is unprecedented. And here's the real risk. OpenAI is projected to lose $44 billion cumulatively before reaching profitability. Anthropic's valuation has risen 15x in 14 months on the same underlying business. Both companies are being priced for perfection at a moment when the first companies to actually deploy their products at scale are blowing their AI budgets and cancelling licenses. The real liquidation pressure from these IPOs doesn't even arrive at listing day. It arrives 180 days later when lock-up periods expire and early investors and employees can finally sell. That is when the real rotation happens. The S&P 500 concentration risk is genuine. The Magnificent 7 now represent 36% of the entire index, higher than the dot-com peak in 2000. If any of these companies disappoint, the index follows. That is not a conspiracy. That is basic math. Three historically unprecedented IPOs. $44 billion in projected OpenAI losses. An AI capex cycle that must deliver ROI. Lock-up expirations six months after listing. That combination is what you must pay attention to, as it often break cycles.

Crypto Rover

69,902 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sam Altman just went on camera and begged the man suing him not to walk away. Altman: “My fear at this point is he decides to drop the case right before the trial.” The most prolific liar in Silicon Valley history is on television pretending he wants the trial. Performing bravery for an audience he assumes will never read a single filing. This is what panic sounds like when it learns to speak in a calm voice. OpenAI was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit. They raised billions under one legally binding covenant. Whatever they built would belong to the public. No equity. No dividends. No corporate capture. Then Altman looked at the balance sheet and saw the biggest payday in the history of technology sitting right in front of him. So he gutted the covenant. He wrapped a for-profit shell around a public trust. He handed the equity to Microsoft. He locked the founding charter in a drawer and started selling subscriptions to what he promised would belong to everyone. He didn’t pivot. He looted. And he did it with a smile. The soft voice. The rehearsed humility. The grey crewneck and the headphones. Every pixel of the persona engineered to make you forget you are watching a man who stole a charity. Now Elon Musk is standing in a courtroom with the receipts. And Altman cannot gaslight a judge the way he gaslights a podcast host. If a court allows that conversion to survive, it does not just validate one man’s fraud. It permanently corrupts the American non-profit system. Every venture capitalist on Earth gets a new playbook overnight. Raise your capital tax-free. Promise to save humanity. Fund your R&D with public goodwill. The absolute second you strike gold, flip the paperwork and charge admission. Altman is not brave. He is cornered. He is not afraid Musk will drop the case. He is afraid of what discovery will drag into the light when Musk doesn’t. Because discovery does not care about the soft voice. Discovery does not care about the rehearsed concern. Discovery opens the books. And the books will show exactly how Sam Altman turned a charity built to protect the human race into a $300 billion personal vehicle selling API access to the technology he swore would be free. Elon Musk does not need to win a press cycle. He does not need to perform calm on camera. He needs one thing. The legal authority to open the books. And he is not backing down. They promised to hand humanity the fire. Then Sam Altman quietly built a tollbooth around it and started billing by the token.

Sam Altman just went on camera and begged the man suing him not to walk away. Altman: “My fear at this point is he decides to drop the case right before the trial.” The most prolific liar in Silicon Valley history is on television pretending he wants the trial. Performing bravery for an audience he assumes will never read a single filing. This is what panic sounds like when it learns to speak in a calm voice. OpenAI was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit. They raised billions under one legally binding covenant. Whatever they built would belong to the public. No equity. No dividends. No corporate capture. Then Altman looked at the balance sheet and saw the biggest payday in the history of technology sitting right in front of him. So he gutted the covenant. He wrapped a for-profit shell around a public trust. He handed the equity to Microsoft. He locked the founding charter in a drawer and started selling subscriptions to what he promised would belong to everyone. He didn’t pivot. He looted. And he did it with a smile. The soft voice. The rehearsed humility. The grey crewneck and the headphones. Every pixel of the persona engineered to make you forget you are watching a man who stole a charity. Now Elon Musk is standing in a courtroom with the receipts. And Altman cannot gaslight a judge the way he gaslights a podcast host. If a court allows that conversion to survive, it does not just validate one man’s fraud. It permanently corrupts the American non-profit system. Every venture capitalist on Earth gets a new playbook overnight. Raise your capital tax-free. Promise to save humanity. Fund your R&D with public goodwill. The absolute second you strike gold, flip the paperwork and charge admission. Altman is not brave. He is cornered. He is not afraid Musk will drop the case. He is afraid of what discovery will drag into the light when Musk doesn’t. Because discovery does not care about the soft voice. Discovery does not care about the rehearsed concern. Discovery opens the books. And the books will show exactly how Sam Altman turned a charity built to protect the human race into a $300 billion personal vehicle selling API access to the technology he swore would be free. Elon Musk does not need to win a press cycle. He does not need to perform calm on camera. He needs one thing. The legal authority to open the books. And he is not backing down. They promised to hand humanity the fire. Then Sam Altman quietly built a tollbooth around it and started billing by the token.

Dustin

113,042 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

introducing the media synthesis museum an active and interactive entity created to preserve generative cultural objects it starts as a Hugging Face organization that contains modern code for old techniques: VQGAN+CLIP, DALL-E Mini, ModelScope Video, Stable Diffusion 1.5 you can use old models/technique directly on Spaces or locally on modern hardware/software, without the old "colab notebook" dependency rot the idea is to really preserve and make accessible those artifacts and aesthetics - both open source. In the future, we hope to also have also historically relevant closed source like DALL-E 1 and DALL-E 2 from OpenAI, older Midjourney models, older Runway apps/techniques/models (cc Cristóbal Valenzuela David Sam Altman)

introducing the media synthesis museum an active and interactive entity created to preserve generative cultural objects it starts as a Hugging Face organization that contains modern code for old techniques: VQGAN+CLIP, DALL-E Mini, ModelScope Video, Stable Diffusion 1.5 you can use old models/technique directly on Spaces or locally on modern hardware/software, without the old "colab notebook" dependency rot the idea is to really preserve and make accessible those artifacts and aesthetics - both open source. In the future, we hope to also have also historically relevant closed source like DALL-E 1 and DALL-E 2 from OpenAI, older Midjourney models, older Runway apps/techniques/models (cc Cristóbal Valenzuela David Sam Altman)

apolinario (poli)

11,143 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Sam Altman and Dario Amodei just got caught running a $2 trillion scam on the entire world. The timing exposes EVERYTHING: Four days after OpenAI secretly filed for a $1 trillion IPO, Altman went on stage in Sydney and said he was "delighted to be wrong" about AI destroying jobs. Amodei reversed his forecast the same week. Anthropic is targeting its own IPO in October at a $900 billion valuation. Fortune called it coordinated and they're not wrong. But here's the thing... This was never a scientific forecast to begin with. In 2024 and 2025, both CEOs needed two things simultaneously - government attention and private investment. Apocalyptic predictions delivered both. When you tell senators that AI will eliminate half of all white-collar jobs, you get called to testify. You get taken seriously as a national security issue and get positioned as the responsible adult in the room who understands the danger better than anyone. And when you tell investors the same story, you create urgency. Urgency drives capital. Capital drives valuation. Amodei said 50% of white-collar jobs were at risk. Altman said entire job categories would vanish. Both said it repeatedly, in major venues, through all of 2025. Now they need something different. OpenAI is losing $1.22 for every $1 it earns. $14 billion in losses this year against $25 billion in revenue. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are preparing the roadshow with the S-1 going public in late August. You cannot walk into a public market telling investors the technology you built is an existential threat to the economy. That is NOT a story Wall Street buys at a $1 trillion valuation. That is a story that triggers Senate hearings, regulatory intervention, and class-action lawsuits from every displaced worker in America. So the story changed. Altman's exact words in Sydney: "I'm delighted to be wrong. I thought there would have been more impact on entry-level white-collar jobs by now than has actually happened." Then he added one sentence that every financial journalist should have flagged: "It still may." So the apocalypse is just "rescheduled" - specifically to after the IPO lockup period expires. He took the L on timing, kept the vision intact, and protected the roadshow. And 115,000 tech workers laid off so far in 2026 - with Meta, Amazon, and Snap all citing AI as the driver - are watching the men who predicted their displacement announce they were WRONG about it, four days after filing to go public at a combined $2 trillion valuation. They sold the world fear to raise money, then switched up at the right time to raise more.

Sam Altman and Dario Amodei just got caught running a $2 trillion scam on the entire world. The timing exposes EVERYTHING: Four days after OpenAI secretly filed for a $1 trillion IPO, Altman went on stage in Sydney and said he was "delighted to be wrong" about AI destroying jobs. Amodei reversed his forecast the same week. Anthropic is targeting its own IPO in October at a $900 billion valuation. Fortune called it coordinated and they're not wrong. But here's the thing... This was never a scientific forecast to begin with. In 2024 and 2025, both CEOs needed two things simultaneously - government attention and private investment. Apocalyptic predictions delivered both. When you tell senators that AI will eliminate half of all white-collar jobs, you get called to testify. You get taken seriously as a national security issue and get positioned as the responsible adult in the room who understands the danger better than anyone. And when you tell investors the same story, you create urgency. Urgency drives capital. Capital drives valuation. Amodei said 50% of white-collar jobs were at risk. Altman said entire job categories would vanish. Both said it repeatedly, in major venues, through all of 2025. Now they need something different. OpenAI is losing $1.22 for every $1 it earns. $14 billion in losses this year against $25 billion in revenue. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are preparing the roadshow with the S-1 going public in late August. You cannot walk into a public market telling investors the technology you built is an existential threat to the economy. That is NOT a story Wall Street buys at a $1 trillion valuation. That is a story that triggers Senate hearings, regulatory intervention, and class-action lawsuits from every displaced worker in America. So the story changed. Altman's exact words in Sydney: "I'm delighted to be wrong. I thought there would have been more impact on entry-level white-collar jobs by now than has actually happened." Then he added one sentence that every financial journalist should have flagged: "It still may." So the apocalypse is just "rescheduled" - specifically to after the IPO lockup period expires. He took the L on timing, kept the vision intact, and protected the roadshow. And 115,000 tech workers laid off so far in 2026 - with Meta, Amazon, and Snap all citing AI as the driver - are watching the men who predicted their displacement announce they were WRONG about it, four days after filing to go public at a combined $2 trillion valuation. They sold the world fear to raise money, then switched up at the right time to raise more.

Ricardo

84,941 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад