Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“Venture capital is not an asset class.” Ian Sigalow explains why diversification in venture can actually LOWER returns — and why only a small number of firms consistently matter. One of the clearest explanations of venture power laws and allocator behavior I’ve heard. Full conversation on YouTube.

960,427 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Q: What are VCs looking for in the companies they fund? Marc Andreessen, founder of Netscape and venture firm a16z, explains in the clip below that venture capitalist business is a game of outliers: “The conventional statistics are that about 200 of the 4,000 venture-fundable companies per year will be funded by a top-tier VC. About 15 of those will someday get to $100MM of revenue, and those 15 will generate something on the order of 97% of all of the returns for the entire category of venture capital in that year.” He continues: “Venture capital is such an extreme feast or famine business. You’re either in one of the 15 or you’re not.” Most VCs are looking for extreme outliers, and when they’re evaluating your startup, they’re asking themselves if this business is one of the 15 businesses that year that will get to $100MM in revenue. One principle Marc believes helps firms invest in outliers is: invest in strength rather than lack of weakness. “The default way to do venture capital is to check boxes: really good founder, really good idea, really good product, really good initial customers. Check, check, check, check. ‘Ok this is reasonable, I’ll put money into it.’ But what you find with those checkbox deals is that they don’t have something that makes them really remarkable and special. They don’t have an extreme strength that makes them an outlier.” The takeaway for founders here is to make sure they highlight to VCs during the funding process that they have a really extreme strength across an important dimension.

Michael McGuiness

587,670 просмотров • 3 лет назад

My conversation with Rebecca Kaden Rebecca Kaden is a General Partner at Union Square Ventures, one of the world's leading venture capital firms and an early investor in companies like Twitter, Etsy, Coinbase, and Twilio. She focuses on identifying the next generation of technology platforms shaping the future of AI, energy, and software. We discuss why AI is still dramatically underhyped, how the next wave of billion-dollar companies will be built, the future of open versus closed AI ecosystems, why venture capital operates on decade-long cycles, and the frameworks Rebecca uses to evaluate world-changing technologies before the rest of the market. We also discuss: - Why USV open-sources its investment thesis - The four possible futures of AI - How AI agents are changing venture capital - Why USV is investing in programmable energy - Why the best VCs think in decades, not years - Why founders should optimize for bigger outcomes, not safer bets Enjoy! Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 5:28 - Market Cycles vs. Fund Cycles 8:28 - The Rebel Alliance & Open Ecosystems 11:18 - The Four Quadrants & Future Of AI 12:51 - Programmable Energy Bets 14:02 - Renewed Application Layer Conviction 18:11 - Public Thinking as Alpha 21:39 - Developing and Testing a Thesis 27:16 - Changing Market Structures From The Outside In 33:26 - Flexibility in Small Fund Sizes 35:59 - Selling on the way up 39:58 - Building Internal AI Agents 47:00 - Data at the Edge Thesis 51:46 - Trailblazer Trade-offs

Erica Wenger

30,267 просмотров • 1 месяц назад