Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 VIDEO FRAME ANALYSIS. WHAT THE CAMERA ACTUALLY SHOWS 🚨 This still is from ICE Agent Johnathan David Ross's own cellphone footage. It matters bc perspective matters. First. Camera angle. The phone is already canted off the driver side. That means the agent was not directly in front of...

geraldwayne's profile picture

Mr. Gerald Wayne

4,283 subscribers

28,881 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨BREAKING: Newly released ICE agent camera footage directly contradicts the claim that Renee Nicole Good tried to hit an agent with her vehicle. From the agent’s own angle, it’s clear Renee Nicole Good never posed a threat. In the synchronized footage, you can see her wife attempting to get into the car. They are preparing to leave. Suddenly, multiple ICE agents rush the vehicle. One agent moves toward the driver’s door and attempts to open it, trying to pull her out. Renee backs up. She then clearly turns the wheel AWAY from the agent. The agent has an unobstructed view of the steering wheel on his phone. He can see she is turning the car away, not toward him. That is when he pulls his gun. He does not draw his weapon because she is threatening him with the vehicle, he can see she is turning AWAY from him. He draws it to stop her from leaving. As the car turns away, the agent leans over the hood and fires the first shot. By the second shot, he is already further to the side of the vehicle. By the third shot, the car is driving away. Every single shot was fired after it was clear the vehicle was moving AWAY from him. Those shots were not fired to protect his life. They were fired to stop her from leaving. That is not self-defense. That is lethal force used to prevent escape. That is murder.
0:42

🚨BREAKING: Newly released ICE agent camera footage directly contradicts the claim that Renee Nicole Good tried to hit an agent with her vehicle. From the agent’s own angle, it’s clear Renee Nicole Good never posed a threat. In the synchronized footage, you can see her wife attempting to get into the car. They are preparing to leave. Suddenly, multiple ICE agents rush the vehicle. One agent moves toward the driver’s door and attempts to open it, trying to pull her out. Renee backs up. She then clearly turns the wheel AWAY from the agent. The agent has an unobstructed view of the steering wheel on his phone. He can see she is turning the car away, not toward him. That is when he pulls his gun. He does not draw his weapon because she is threatening him with the vehicle, he can see she is turning AWAY from him. He draws it to stop her from leaving. As the car turns away, the agent leans over the hood and fires the first shot. By the second shot, he is already further to the side of the vehicle. By the third shot, the car is driving away. Every single shot was fired after it was clear the vehicle was moving AWAY from him. Those shots were not fired to protect his life. They were fired to stop her from leaving. That is not self-defense. That is lethal force used to prevent escape. That is murder.

Jesus Freakin Congress

328,164 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I put together this analysis. This constitutes homicide. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Two facts are dispositive. First, the driver placed the vehicle in reverse to increase distance between herself and the agent positioned in front of the car. That action is inconsistent with an intent to strike or run over the agent. If the objective were to cause harm, reversing would have been unnecessary and counterproductive. Second, the driver turned the steering wheel to the right, away from the agent. At that point, the agent moved to the left side of the vehicle and was no longer in the vehicle’s path. The threat had dissipated. The agent then leaned over the hood, aimed, and fired. The use of deadly force was not reactive to an imminent threat. It was a discretionary act taken after the threat had ceased. This was not a justified shooting. It was an unlawful killing.
1:15

I put together this analysis. This constitutes homicide. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Two facts are dispositive. First, the driver placed the vehicle in reverse to increase distance between herself and the agent positioned in front of the car. That action is inconsistent with an intent to strike or run over the agent. If the objective were to cause harm, reversing would have been unnecessary and counterproductive. Second, the driver turned the steering wheel to the right, away from the agent. At that point, the agent moved to the left side of the vehicle and was no longer in the vehicle’s path. The threat had dissipated. The agent then leaned over the hood, aimed, and fired. The use of deadly force was not reactive to an imminent threat. It was a discretionary act taken after the threat had ceased. This was not a justified shooting. It was an unlawful killing.

Agent Self FBI

1,828,666 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

A woman was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis during a federal enforcement operation, with sharply conflicting accounts emerging. DHS and the White House say the agent fired defensive shots after the woman attempted to use her car as a weapon while officers were blocked in snow. Minnesota officials say video footage shows the agent had room to move clear, was not struck by the vehicle as it drove off, and that the woman was not a target of immigration enforcement. The state says she was alone in the car and that a full investigation is under way to determine whether the use of lethal force was justified. Videos circulating on social media and broadcast by local media appear to show ICE agents arriving in a silver truck, ordering the woman to exit her vehicle and one agent tugging at the driver’s door. Footage shows shots fired within seconds as the vehicle begins to move away, before crashing into a parked car. The agent appears able to move clear and is not seen being struck by the vehicle. #Minneapolis
0:22

A woman was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis during a federal enforcement operation, with sharply conflicting accounts emerging. DHS and the White House say the agent fired defensive shots after the woman attempted to use her car as a weapon while officers were blocked in snow. Minnesota officials say video footage shows the agent had room to move clear, was not struck by the vehicle as it drove off, and that the woman was not a target of immigration enforcement. The state says she was alone in the car and that a full investigation is under way to determine whether the use of lethal force was justified. Videos circulating on social media and broadcast by local media appear to show ICE agents arriving in a silver truck, ordering the woman to exit her vehicle and one agent tugging at the driver’s door. Footage shows shots fired within seconds as the vehicle begins to move away, before crashing into a parked car. The agent appears able to move clear and is not seen being struck by the vehicle. #Minneapolis

BPI News

129,956 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: New video footage shows ICE agents shooting a man trying to drive away, in Patterson, California… Proving DHS lied AGAIN. In the video, the driver is clearly reversing to get out of a boxed‑in spot. He backs up and accidentally hits an unmarked agent vehicle parked behind him… Not ramming anyone. Not charging an agent. Just trying to get away. That’s when the agents step in front of the car with guns drawn. The driver tries to turn and drive off, and this is when you can see at least one agent open fire. At no point does the driver attempt to strike an ICE agent. At no point is there any credible threat of him “trying to run an officer over.” The agents are not running away, not avoiding the car, not afraid for their lives… they’re standing in front of the car and firing into it. This directly contradicts DHS’s claim that “as officers approached the car, the wanted gang member weaponized his vehicle in an attempt to run an officer over” and that they fired only because they were in danger. And this is tragically familiar. This isn’t a split‑second judgment call or a disagreement over technique… This is a pattern: ICE agents opening fire on a person trying to flee. And every time footage comes out, the DHS narrative unravels. Every. Single. Time. Remember that next time someone tells you these shootings are “justified,” or that these agencies are being transparent. The video doesn’t lie… but they sure do.
0:28

🚨BREAKING: New video footage shows ICE agents shooting a man trying to drive away, in Patterson, California… Proving DHS lied AGAIN. In the video, the driver is clearly reversing to get out of a boxed‑in spot. He backs up and accidentally hits an unmarked agent vehicle parked behind him… Not ramming anyone. Not charging an agent. Just trying to get away. That’s when the agents step in front of the car with guns drawn. The driver tries to turn and drive off, and this is when you can see at least one agent open fire. At no point does the driver attempt to strike an ICE agent. At no point is there any credible threat of him “trying to run an officer over.” The agents are not running away, not avoiding the car, not afraid for their lives… they’re standing in front of the car and firing into it. This directly contradicts DHS’s claim that “as officers approached the car, the wanted gang member weaponized his vehicle in an attempt to run an officer over” and that they fired only because they were in danger. And this is tragically familiar. This isn’t a split‑second judgment call or a disagreement over technique… This is a pattern: ICE agents opening fire on a person trying to flee. And every time footage comes out, the DHS narrative unravels. Every. Single. Time. Remember that next time someone tells you these shootings are “justified,” or that these agencies are being transparent. The video doesn’t lie… but they sure do.

Jesus Freakin Congress

184,922 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: A new video shows DHS lied, again, about an ICE shooting. Yesterday, ICE reportedly told police that a man “weaponized” his vehicle by “ramming” into an ICE sedan, forcing an agent to fire his gun during an operation in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Except… that’s not what the video shows. In the video, an ICE agent rushes the driver’s window with his gun drawn. The agent recklessly waves his gun around, and appears to order the driver to roll down the window. That’s an extreme use of force from the very beginning. Another agent approaches the car, and moments later, they violently smash the driver’s window. And notice how the driver doesn’t try to flee until ICE violently escalates everything. He drives around the ICE vehicle, makes it into the street… not hitting a single ICE agent, or vehicle. Then, AFTER the car is already past every agent, and driving away, an ICE agent opens fire. The law is pretty clear… officers may only use deadly force, against a fleeing person, if they have probable cause to believe that person poses an immediate threat of death, or serious physical injury to the officer, or others. So, where was the immediate threat? The car had already passed the agents… and was driving AWAY. ICE also claimed Lara-Hernandez had a criminal history of assault, and that this was a targeted enforcement operation. Yet, publicly available court records reportedly do not show any active warrants. Federal agents don’t get to point guns at people without legal justification. They don’t get to fire at a vehicle after the immediate threat has passed. And they don’t get to lie to police about what happened. So, when are we going to start holding these agents accountable?
1:20

🚨BREAKING: A new video shows DHS lied, again, about an ICE shooting. Yesterday, ICE reportedly told police that a man “weaponized” his vehicle by “ramming” into an ICE sedan, forcing an agent to fire his gun during an operation in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Except… that’s not what the video shows. In the video, an ICE agent rushes the driver’s window with his gun drawn. The agent recklessly waves his gun around, and appears to order the driver to roll down the window. That’s an extreme use of force from the very beginning. Another agent approaches the car, and moments later, they violently smash the driver’s window. And notice how the driver doesn’t try to flee until ICE violently escalates everything. He drives around the ICE vehicle, makes it into the street… not hitting a single ICE agent, or vehicle. Then, AFTER the car is already past every agent, and driving away, an ICE agent opens fire. The law is pretty clear… officers may only use deadly force, against a fleeing person, if they have probable cause to believe that person poses an immediate threat of death, or serious physical injury to the officer, or others. So, where was the immediate threat? The car had already passed the agents… and was driving AWAY. ICE also claimed Lara-Hernandez had a criminal history of assault, and that this was a targeted enforcement operation. Yet, publicly available court records reportedly do not show any active warrants. Federal agents don’t get to point guns at people without legal justification. They don’t get to fire at a vehicle after the immediate threat has passed. And they don’t get to lie to police about what happened. So, when are we going to start holding these agents accountable?

Jesus Freakin Congress

687,151 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🔥🚨BREAKING: The vehicle the Left-Wing Terrorist was driving is being LOADED onto a flatbed truck to be removed from the scene. There is a BULLET HOLE in the front windshield! If the I.C.E. Agent was NOT in front of the vehicle, then how did that get there?
1:31

🔥🚨BREAKING: The vehicle the Left-Wing Terrorist was driving is being LOADED onto a flatbed truck to be removed from the scene. There is a BULLET HOLE in the front windshield! If the I.C.E. Agent was NOT in front of the vehicle, then how did that get there?

The Patriot Oasis™

38,518 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Tim Pool is right in his analysis. The officer was NOT in front of her vehicle until AFTER she backed up. The front tires then accelerate while they are pointed towards the agent, and appear to spin out on the ICE. This is all the information the ICE agent had in the moment. Also, there was no reason for her to back up to leave. The road was clear in front of her and the ICE agents were to the left and right of her car. The ICE agent only ended up in front because she backed up. This leads me to believe she wasn’t just trying to leave. Chat - what do you think?
1:11

Tim Pool is right in his analysis. The officer was NOT in front of her vehicle until AFTER she backed up. The front tires then accelerate while they are pointed towards the agent, and appear to spin out on the ICE. This is all the information the ICE agent had in the moment. Also, there was no reason for her to back up to leave. The road was clear in front of her and the ICE agents were to the left and right of her car. The ICE agent only ended up in front because she backed up. This leads me to believe she wasn’t just trying to leave. Chat - what do you think?

Adam Francisco

2,343,259 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: In the Chicago suburbs, an ICE agent assaults a teenager for filming his vehicle, and pointing out that it illegally has no license plate. In the video, a U.S. citizen is peacefully filming an ICE vehicle, that is sitting in a parking lot. He walks to the back of the SUV to document that it has no license plate. That’s when the ICE agent jumps out, screaming, “Get away from my vehicle!” while aggressively charging toward the teenager. The teenager immediately backs away, but the ICE agent keeps walking at him, tries to trip the teenager , and continues yelling… even though neither of them are anywhere near the vehicle anymore. Filming government officials performing their duties, in public, is protected by the First Amendment. That protection doesn’t disappear just because the official doesn’t like being recorded. An officer also can’t lawfully use physical force simply because someone is filming them. Using force, to stop someone from recording, is a violation of that person’s constitutional rights. And let’s not ignore the reason the ICE agent got out of his car in the first place... Illinois law requires vehicles, driven on public roads, to display valid registration plates. This ICE vehicle is not following that law. So, if your first instinct, when someone records your conduct, is to assault them… you’re proving exactly why the public is recording in the first place.
0:23

🚨BREAKING: In the Chicago suburbs, an ICE agent assaults a teenager for filming his vehicle, and pointing out that it illegally has no license plate. In the video, a U.S. citizen is peacefully filming an ICE vehicle, that is sitting in a parking lot. He walks to the back of the SUV to document that it has no license plate. That’s when the ICE agent jumps out, screaming, “Get away from my vehicle!” while aggressively charging toward the teenager. The teenager immediately backs away, but the ICE agent keeps walking at him, tries to trip the teenager , and continues yelling… even though neither of them are anywhere near the vehicle anymore. Filming government officials performing their duties, in public, is protected by the First Amendment. That protection doesn’t disappear just because the official doesn’t like being recorded. An officer also can’t lawfully use physical force simply because someone is filming them. Using force, to stop someone from recording, is a violation of that person’s constitutional rights. And let’s not ignore the reason the ICE agent got out of his car in the first place... Illinois law requires vehicles, driven on public roads, to display valid registration plates. This ICE vehicle is not following that law. So, if your first instinct, when someone records your conduct, is to assault them… you’re proving exactly why the public is recording in the first place.

Jesus Freakin Congress

6,960,143 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: Woman shot and killed by ICE agent during altercation in Minneapolis. This is a developing situation. — Video analysis provided by Josh Brooks : Cell phone footage recorded near East 34th Street and Portland Avenue shows members of ICE attempting to clear a blocked road during on-going operations in the Minneapolis area. It's unclear exactly what caused the individual driving the vehicle to block the road, but it's likely that the person was attempting to impede ICE operations in the area which is fairly normal for downtown Minneapolis. After several seconds, the vehicle in question attempts to drive away from the ICE agents that are confronting the driver. The wheels of the suspect vehicle slip on the ice before the driver gets traction and starts to speed away from the scene, prompting the ICE agents to open fire, killing the driver and causing them to crash into an adjacent power pole and vehicle. Due to the angle of the recording camera, it's unclear if the ICE agent was in front of the vehicle, which would likely justify the shooting as cars are commonly referred to as deadly weapons when the driver turns them into a battering ram against law enforcement.
0:38

BREAKING: Woman shot and killed by ICE agent during altercation in Minneapolis. This is a developing situation. — Video analysis provided by Josh Brooks : Cell phone footage recorded near East 34th Street and Portland Avenue shows members of ICE attempting to clear a blocked road during on-going operations in the Minneapolis area. It's unclear exactly what caused the individual driving the vehicle to block the road, but it's likely that the person was attempting to impede ICE operations in the area which is fairly normal for downtown Minneapolis. After several seconds, the vehicle in question attempts to drive away from the ICE agents that are confronting the driver. The wheels of the suspect vehicle slip on the ice before the driver gets traction and starts to speed away from the scene, prompting the ICE agents to open fire, killing the driver and causing them to crash into an adjacent power pole and vehicle. Due to the angle of the recording camera, it's unclear if the ICE agent was in front of the vehicle, which would likely justify the shooting as cars are commonly referred to as deadly weapons when the driver turns them into a battering ram against law enforcement.

FUNKER530

2,492,929 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Exactly. While this is true, it’s also irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Ross was at fault, period. Here’s why: First off, it’s against DHS policy & training for an officer to approach a vehicle from the front in this situation, and this “officer-induced jeopardy” negates the officers use of force claim and puts him at fault, period. There’s no debate on this as video evidence from multiple sources clearly show Ross stopping in front of her vehicle, and then taking the time to shift his phone from his right hand to his left so he can draw his weapon…BEFORE she even started moving. THIS is simply reality, and the conversation should end here. Second, it’s against DHS Use of Deadly Force policy (which is codified law) to fire at a moving vehicle that doesn’t pose imminent danger to officers, and even if they ARE in danger, it mandates deescalation before using deadly force, which EXPRESSLY states simply “moving out of the way” of a vehicle as a correct course of action before using deadly force (see attached doc below). Third, there is already well-established legal precedent governing these EXACT types of situations, and this officer would likely be found guilty by any jury in the U.S. For example: Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.” Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.” Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.” Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.” Fifth, the videos/pics below CLEARLY show the officer was NOT in immediate danger, and the woman was moving away from him when he fired his FIRST shot when he was already clear to the left of the vehicle, and he fired the second & third shots point-blank into her face from the SIDE of the vehicle as she passed. That alone is enough to send him to prison, even if his first shot was somehow inexplicably deemed to be justified.
0:28

Exactly. While this is true, it’s also irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Ross was at fault, period. Here’s why: First off, it’s against DHS policy & training for an officer to approach a vehicle from the front in this situation, and this “officer-induced jeopardy” negates the officers use of force claim and puts him at fault, period. There’s no debate on this as video evidence from multiple sources clearly show Ross stopping in front of her vehicle, and then taking the time to shift his phone from his right hand to his left so he can draw his weapon…BEFORE she even started moving. THIS is simply reality, and the conversation should end here. Second, it’s against DHS Use of Deadly Force policy (which is codified law) to fire at a moving vehicle that doesn’t pose imminent danger to officers, and even if they ARE in danger, it mandates deescalation before using deadly force, which EXPRESSLY states simply “moving out of the way” of a vehicle as a correct course of action before using deadly force (see attached doc below). Third, there is already well-established legal precedent governing these EXACT types of situations, and this officer would likely be found guilty by any jury in the U.S. For example: Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.” Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.” Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.” Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.” Fifth, the videos/pics below CLEARLY show the officer was NOT in immediate danger, and the woman was moving away from him when he fired his FIRST shot when he was already clear to the left of the vehicle, and he fired the second & third shots point-blank into her face from the SIDE of the vehicle as she passed. That alone is enough to send him to prison, even if his first shot was somehow inexplicably deemed to be justified.

Notorious PJB

18,329 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

It seems that Republicans are trying to gaslight everyone into believing that Dayanne Figueroa rammed into an ICE agent’s car… So let’s break down the video, frame by frame. 1. This is Chicago… a dense, urban area with traffic in every direction. 2. The street is two-way… you can clearly see another car driving toward the camera. 3. The ICE agent, in an unmarked vehicle, is sitting in the road. 4. They then make a very wide turn… onto the left side of the road. 5. At this point, the agent is driving on the wrong side of the road. 6. The ICE agent, seemingly unaware of their surroundings (never ideal while driving in a major city), tries to enter the correct lane… without signaling, and without checking to see if someone’s already in that lane. 7. And it turns out, someone was already in that lane… Note: A federal agent, in an unmarked vehicle, does not have the right of way unless they have their 🚨 on. The ICE agent did NOT have their 🚨 on. 8. So, the ICE agent made an improper and unsafe lane change and hit Dayanne Figueroa’s car. 9. Then, they started to drive away, but decided to kidnapped her first. Hope this helps.
1:01

It seems that Republicans are trying to gaslight everyone into believing that Dayanne Figueroa rammed into an ICE agent’s car… So let’s break down the video, frame by frame. 1. This is Chicago… a dense, urban area with traffic in every direction. 2. The street is two-way… you can clearly see another car driving toward the camera. 3. The ICE agent, in an unmarked vehicle, is sitting in the road. 4. They then make a very wide turn… onto the left side of the road. 5. At this point, the agent is driving on the wrong side of the road. 6. The ICE agent, seemingly unaware of their surroundings (never ideal while driving in a major city), tries to enter the correct lane… without signaling, and without checking to see if someone’s already in that lane. 7. And it turns out, someone was already in that lane… Note: A federal agent, in an unmarked vehicle, does not have the right of way unless they have their 🚨 on. The ICE agent did NOT have their 🚨 on. 8. So, the ICE agent made an improper and unsafe lane change and hit Dayanne Figueroa’s car. 9. Then, they started to drive away, but decided to kidnapped her first. Hope this helps.

Jesus Freakin Congress

70,221 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

.Pete Buttigieg: "We have an ICE agent who should have been trained not to be in front of a vehicle and never to shoot into a moving vehicle, and yet this happened on [Kristi Noem's] watch. The whole POINT of Homeland Security is to make this country more stable and safe. And it is very clear on this administration's watch that the opposite is what's happened."
0:45

.Pete Buttigieg: "We have an ICE agent who should have been trained not to be in front of a vehicle and never to shoot into a moving vehicle, and yet this happened on [Kristi Noem's] watch. The whole POINT of Homeland Security is to make this country more stable and safe. And it is very clear on this administration's watch that the opposite is what's happened."

Brian Tyler Cohen

844,272 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

In light of the tragic shooting of #ReneeNicoleGood by ICE agent Jonathan David Ross in Minneapolis, here are key facts for transparency and accountability—without calls for violence. People deserve the truth. Bystander footage shows Agent Ross was not in the vehicle's direct path when he fired, raising questions about use of force. The Star Tribune first publicly identified him—not anyone on X or social media. Set the record straight on who "doxxed" first. Court documents reveal Agent Ross was dragged by a vehicle in a June 2025 altercation during an arrest. This history is public record. DHS policy prohibits agents from firing at moving vehicles unless there's an imminent threat of death or serious injury—which the video suggests wasn't the case here. She should have gotten out of the vehicle, complied with the agent, and moved on with her day. None of this would have happened.
1:57

In light of the tragic shooting of #ReneeNicoleGood by ICE agent Jonathan David Ross in Minneapolis, here are key facts for transparency and accountability—without calls for violence. People deserve the truth. Bystander footage shows Agent Ross was not in the vehicle's direct path when he fired, raising questions about use of force. The Star Tribune first publicly identified him—not anyone on X or social media. Set the record straight on who "doxxed" first. Court documents reveal Agent Ross was dragged by a vehicle in a June 2025 altercation during an arrest. This history is public record. DHS policy prohibits agents from firing at moving vehicles unless there's an imminent threat of death or serious injury—which the video suggests wasn't the case here. She should have gotten out of the vehicle, complied with the agent, and moved on with her day. None of this would have happened.

Moon

112,623 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

CNN chief law enforcement and intel analyst John Miller argues the ICE agent acted inappropriately in shooting dead a woman coming at him in her car, citing the Police Executive Research Forum report... “If you're confronted by a moving vehicle that could be a threat to you, get out of the way of the vehicle and don't shoot at a car. Now, this is DHS policy. I'm reading to you from DHS policy: ‘DHS law enforcement officers are prohibited from discharging firearms at the operator of a moving vehicle or other conveyance, unless the use of deadly force.’” “It also says ‘a law enforcement officer must take into consideration the hazards that may be posed to law enforcement and innocent bystanders by an out-of-control vehicle,’ which we just saw the result of that. The point is, unless the person is literally either using the vehicle to ram other people in a terrorist attack or has a car bomb or is chasing you with the vehicle in particular getting out of the way and reducing the tactical exigency where you're not creating a situation where you're forced to fire these shots is what most law enforcement agencies have adopted.”
1:08

CNN chief law enforcement and intel analyst John Miller argues the ICE agent acted inappropriately in shooting dead a woman coming at him in her car, citing the Police Executive Research Forum report... “If you're confronted by a moving vehicle that could be a threat to you, get out of the way of the vehicle and don't shoot at a car. Now, this is DHS policy. I'm reading to you from DHS policy: ‘DHS law enforcement officers are prohibited from discharging firearms at the operator of a moving vehicle or other conveyance, unless the use of deadly force.’” “It also says ‘a law enforcement officer must take into consideration the hazards that may be posed to law enforcement and innocent bystanders by an out-of-control vehicle,’ which we just saw the result of that. The point is, unless the person is literally either using the vehicle to ram other people in a terrorist attack or has a car bomb or is chasing you with the vehicle in particular getting out of the way and reducing the tactical exigency where you're not creating a situation where you're forced to fire these shots is what most law enforcement agencies have adopted.”

Curtis Houck

40,227 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video trying to ram into a U.S. citizen’s car. In the video, U.S. citizens are driving down the road when an ICE vehicle, traveling in the opposite direction, crosses toward their lane and drives directly at their vehicle. The ICE vehicle pulls a U-turn and begins following the U.S. citizen’s vehicle. Seconds later, another ICE vehicle pulls alongside the car, creating a situation where ICE agents appear to be surrounding and pressuring the American citizens. This is not just alarming… it is dangerous. A government vehicle is not a weapon. Federal agents do not get to use their vehicles to intimidate, pursue, or restrict someone’s movement without legal justification. This is what happens when law enforcement agencies believe they have unlimited power. Federal agents are still bound by the law… and Americans have a right to demand accountability when those laws are ignored.
0:22

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video trying to ram into a U.S. citizen’s car. In the video, U.S. citizens are driving down the road when an ICE vehicle, traveling in the opposite direction, crosses toward their lane and drives directly at their vehicle. The ICE vehicle pulls a U-turn and begins following the U.S. citizen’s vehicle. Seconds later, another ICE vehicle pulls alongside the car, creating a situation where ICE agents appear to be surrounding and pressuring the American citizens. This is not just alarming… it is dangerous. A government vehicle is not a weapon. Federal agents do not get to use their vehicles to intimidate, pursue, or restrict someone’s movement without legal justification. This is what happens when law enforcement agencies believe they have unlimited power. Federal agents are still bound by the law… and Americans have a right to demand accountability when those laws are ignored.

Jesus Freakin Congress

24,534 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🚨BREAKING🚨🚨 There is a video of the ICE agent who fatally shot a woman just moments ago. Despite claims from DHS, there is no evidence of the woman trying to weaponize her car. The agent who shot her did so from the driver side of her vehicle and she was already turning her wheel in the opposite direction.
0:30

🚨🚨BREAKING🚨🚨 There is a video of the ICE agent who fatally shot a woman just moments ago. Despite claims from DHS, there is no evidence of the woman trying to weaponize her car. The agent who shot her did so from the driver side of her vehicle and she was already turning her wheel in the opposite direction.

The Green Dragon Tavern

17,285 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This is why you don’t get in front of a vehicle! I do NOT think he will be doing that again! Dude lunges at a vehicle in a parking lot, breaking the back windshield. He then proceeds to kick the vehicle and challenge the driver to a brawl. The driver gets out for a minute and has words with the attacker before getting back into his vehicle to drive off. The man then steps in front of the vehicle as the driver floors it, giving him a ride on the hood of his car for the length of the parking lot. Play stupid games……
2:40

This is why you don’t get in front of a vehicle! I do NOT think he will be doing that again! Dude lunges at a vehicle in a parking lot, breaking the back windshield. He then proceeds to kick the vehicle and challenge the driver to a brawl. The driver gets out for a minute and has words with the attacker before getting back into his vehicle to drive off. The man then steps in front of the vehicle as the driver floors it, giving him a ride on the hood of his car for the length of the parking lot. Play stupid games……

One Bad Dude

1,192,937 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Commands like “get out of the vehicle” are not suggestions … they are life-saving orders. When a suspect refuses and instead uses a two-ton vehicle to advance, that vehicle becomes a deadly weapon. “Vent to her” or accelerate toward an agent means one thing in use-of-force doctrine … imminent lethal threat. Federal agents are not required to absorb impact to satisfy a democrat narrative. This shooting was not punishment, not vengeance, not ideology … it was self-preservation under the law. Pretending otherwise is willful deception. Libs of TikTok End Wokeness Donald J. Trump #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
0:57

Commands like “get out of the vehicle” are not suggestions … they are life-saving orders. When a suspect refuses and instead uses a two-ton vehicle to advance, that vehicle becomes a deadly weapon. “Vent to her” or accelerate toward an agent means one thing in use-of-force doctrine … imminent lethal threat. Federal agents are not required to absorb impact to satisfy a democrat narrative. This shooting was not punishment, not vengeance, not ideology … it was self-preservation under the law. Pretending otherwise is willful deception. Libs of TikTok End Wokeness Donald J. Trump #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

97,115 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Like I said yesterday. Ex-FBI agent Stu Kaplan stated that ICE agents are bound by Customs and Border Protection use-of-force policy, which explicitly prohibits placing oneself in front of or behind a moving vehicle, except during limited inspection scenarios. He said this policy exists precisely because people may flee during stops. He argued the agent violated that policy by stepping into the vehicle’s path, thereby manufacturing an exigent circumstance. In Kaplan’s view, the danger was created by the officer’s own actions, not by an intentional attack by the driver. Kaplan emphasized that flight is foreseeable and legally anticipated behavior during law-enforcement encounters. Courts, including the Supreme Court, have recognized that officers must plan for the possibility of flight rather than positioning themselves in a way that turns flight into a deadly-force scenario. He noted that the video shows the driver attempting to turn away, not drive toward the agent, and that the agent began drawing his weapon immediately as the car moved, despite having placed himself in harm’s way. Absent evidence that the woman posed an immediate violent threat such as a prior violent felony or an attempt to use the car as a weapon, Kaplan said deadly force was not justified to stop a fleeing suspect for what appeared to be, at most, misdemeanor conduct. His conclusion was that, despite being strongly pro-law-enforcement, this incident may constitute a “bad shoot” because the officer violated policy and then relied on a danger he helped create to justify lethal force.
5:14

Like I said yesterday. Ex-FBI agent Stu Kaplan stated that ICE agents are bound by Customs and Border Protection use-of-force policy, which explicitly prohibits placing oneself in front of or behind a moving vehicle, except during limited inspection scenarios. He said this policy exists precisely because people may flee during stops. He argued the agent violated that policy by stepping into the vehicle’s path, thereby manufacturing an exigent circumstance. In Kaplan’s view, the danger was created by the officer’s own actions, not by an intentional attack by the driver. Kaplan emphasized that flight is foreseeable and legally anticipated behavior during law-enforcement encounters. Courts, including the Supreme Court, have recognized that officers must plan for the possibility of flight rather than positioning themselves in a way that turns flight into a deadly-force scenario. He noted that the video shows the driver attempting to turn away, not drive toward the agent, and that the agent began drawing his weapon immediately as the car moved, despite having placed himself in harm’s way. Absent evidence that the woman posed an immediate violent threat such as a prior violent felony or an attempt to use the car as a weapon, Kaplan said deadly force was not justified to stop a fleeing suspect for what appeared to be, at most, misdemeanor conduct. His conclusion was that, despite being strongly pro-law-enforcement, this incident may constitute a “bad shoot” because the officer violated policy and then relied on a danger he helped create to justify lethal force.

Pete

561,098 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

BREAKING NEWS An eyewitness with a clear, front-facing view says federal agents shot a woman in the head at close range while she sat in her car, directly contradicting official claims of officer endangerment. The witness was on the driver’s side of the vehicle and states no agents were in front of the car, no agent was struck, and no one was in danger when an agent standing at the driver’s window fired multiple shots. The vehicle only moved after the shooting, as the dying driver’s body slumped back. The car then rolled a few feet and hit a parked vehicle. The witness describes agents yelling, agitated, advancing toward the car, then opening fire. Afterward, agents reportedly approached with guns drawn and forcibly pushed civilians away, including the victim’s wife who was trying to render aid and screaming for someone to call 911. This firsthand account directly undermines claims that the shooting was defensive or unavoidable. The witness says plainly: this was not a vehicle attack. No officer was threatened.
5:30

BREAKING NEWS An eyewitness with a clear, front-facing view says federal agents shot a woman in the head at close range while she sat in her car, directly contradicting official claims of officer endangerment. The witness was on the driver’s side of the vehicle and states no agents were in front of the car, no agent was struck, and no one was in danger when an agent standing at the driver’s window fired multiple shots. The vehicle only moved after the shooting, as the dying driver’s body slumped back. The car then rolled a few feet and hit a parked vehicle. The witness describes agents yelling, agitated, advancing toward the car, then opening fire. Afterward, agents reportedly approached with guns drawn and forcibly pushed civilians away, including the victim’s wife who was trying to render aid and screaming for someone to call 911. This firsthand account directly undermines claims that the shooting was defensive or unavoidable. The witness says plainly: this was not a vehicle attack. No officer was threatened.

P a u l ◉

533,275 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад