Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

VIDEO | Madurai: Tamil Nadu CTR Nirmal Kumar (CTR.Nirmalkumar) clarifies about the issues discussed during 31st Southern Zonal Council meeting with Union Home Minister Amit Shah, says, “Something is pending before the Supreme Court, and therefore, it cannot be discussed outside the Court. We are very clear about that.... We did not allow or accept any discussion on matters that are pending before the Supreme Court. Only the matters that were officially listed for discussion were discussed. Apart from that, everyone is free to express their views, but we cannot accept discussions on issues that are pending before the Supreme Court. Nothing regarding the Cauvery or Mekedatu was discussed, and our Chief Minister is very firm on this matter. It has already been clearly stated that anything pending before the Supreme Court, including matters relating to the Cauvery or Mekedatu, cannot be discussed outside the Supreme Court.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -show more

Press Trust of India

4,618,249 subscribers

10,154 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“The judges of the Supreme Court said that it is lawful to have things that are for women-only”. Helen Joyce on Talk about the news that the US Supreme Court has ruled that state laws protecting sport for women and girls are lawful.

“The judges of the Supreme Court said that it is lawful to have things that are for women-only”. Helen Joyce on Talk about the news that the US Supreme Court has ruled that state laws protecting sport for women and girls are lawful.

Sex Matters

12,050 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Kolkata, West Bengal: On hearing in Calcutta High Court on the petitions filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Trinamool Congress (TMC) in connection with the probe agency's recent raids on the premises of I-PAC, TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee says, "ED counsel sought for an adjournment because the matter is pending before the Supreme Court. I clearly stated that I am appearing on behalf of Mamata Banerjee as the Chairperson of the All India Trinamool Congress, and not as the Chief Minister of West Bengal. Secondly, we have stated that blame has been made against the court in this Special Leave Petition (SLP). Thirdly, we have said that we are ready to proceed with the case. The case should be heard... The court has recorded that since the ED has sought time on the ground that the Special Leave Petition is pending, i.e., requested an adjournment, and the lawyers for the respondents have stated that they are ready to participate in the hearing of the case, the matter has been adjourned until the SLP is disposed of by the Supreme Court..."

#WATCH | Kolkata, West Bengal: On hearing in Calcutta High Court on the petitions filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Trinamool Congress (TMC) in connection with the probe agency's recent raids on the premises of I-PAC, TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee says, "ED counsel sought for an adjournment because the matter is pending before the Supreme Court. I clearly stated that I am appearing on behalf of Mamata Banerjee as the Chairperson of the All India Trinamool Congress, and not as the Chief Minister of West Bengal. Secondly, we have stated that blame has been made against the court in this Special Leave Petition (SLP). Thirdly, we have said that we are ready to proceed with the case. The case should be heard... The court has recorded that since the ED has sought time on the ground that the Special Leave Petition is pending, i.e., requested an adjournment, and the lawyers for the respondents have stated that they are ready to participate in the hearing of the case, the matter has been adjourned until the SLP is disposed of by the Supreme Court..."

ANI

44,022 views • 8 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

1,005,824 views • 2 months ago

VIDEO | As the Supreme Court stays the UGC regulation pertaining to the definition of caste discrimination, advocate Satyam Pandey says, "As soon as this issue came to my notice, we filed a case before the Supreme Court... The Supreme Court said that although it is not an academic body, it would be appropriate to consult scholars and academic institutions to better understand the matter and make whatever appropriate changes are required in the regulations... At present, this is partial relief; it is not a final victory... A stay has been put in the matter. The next hearing will be held on March 19." (Full video available on PTI Videos – #UGCRegulations

VIDEO | As the Supreme Court stays the UGC regulation pertaining to the definition of caste discrimination, advocate Satyam Pandey says, "As soon as this issue came to my notice, we filed a case before the Supreme Court... The Supreme Court said that although it is not an academic body, it would be appropriate to consult scholars and academic institutions to better understand the matter and make whatever appropriate changes are required in the regulations... At present, this is partial relief; it is not a final victory... A stay has been put in the matter. The next hearing will be held on March 19." (Full video available on PTI Videos – #UGCRegulations

Press Trust of India

13,384 views • 8 months ago

Holder: The Supreme Court is a broken institution. And it’s something that has to be part of the national conversation in ’26 and in ’28. If there is a Democratic trifecta in 2028—and I think the possibility of that is pretty good—Supreme Court reform has to be on the table. Term limits, at a minimum, and potentially expanding the Court are things that should be seriously considered. We cannot leave in place, without at least a discussion—and I think without substantive reforms being implemented—the Supreme Court as it is presently constituted.

Holder: The Supreme Court is a broken institution. And it’s something that has to be part of the national conversation in ’26 and in ’28. If there is a Democratic trifecta in 2028—and I think the possibility of that is pretty good—Supreme Court reform has to be on the table. Term limits, at a minimum, and potentially expanding the Court are things that should be seriously considered. We cannot leave in place, without at least a discussion—and I think without substantive reforms being implemented—the Supreme Court as it is presently constituted.

Acyn

1,444,336 views • 10 months ago

A judge can go on a vacation, a judiciary cannot. My views, on the catastrophe that is the India judicial system, where 53 million cases are pending even as the Supreme court remains shut for 160 days and 29% of High court and 19% of District court judicial positions lie vacant:

A judge can go on a vacation, a judiciary cannot. My views, on the catastrophe that is the India judicial system, where 53 million cases are pending even as the Supreme court remains shut for 160 days and 29% of High court and 19% of District court judicial positions lie vacant:

Anand Ranganathan

329,851 views • 11 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

ANI

73,891 views • 4 months ago

VIDEO | Advocate Umesh Sharma, counsel for Swatantra Bhardwaj, on Delhi High Court dismissing the habeas corpus plea filed by Bhardwaj challenging his arrest, says, "The High Court refused to entertain the matter. This was because the SHO of Parliament Street told the court that the FIR in question was not among those quashed by the Supreme Court. Apart from this, regarding our other grounds, the High Court said that since there is a judicial order, we should challenge that order. Regarding the remand, the police counsel said that, since the entire police team was involved, Bhardwaj was produced virtually before the magistrate the day before yesterday, physically yesterday and virtually again today. He was then remanded to 14 days' judicial custody. The High Court said we should challenge that order. We were arguing that since this FIR had been quashed, there was no basis for arrest and therefore the arrest was illegal." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Advocate Umesh Sharma, counsel for Swatantra Bhardwaj, on Delhi High Court dismissing the habeas corpus plea filed by Bhardwaj challenging his arrest, says, "The High Court refused to entertain the matter. This was because the SHO of Parliament Street told the court that the FIR in question was not among those quashed by the Supreme Court. Apart from this, regarding our other grounds, the High Court said that since there is a judicial order, we should challenge that order. Regarding the remand, the police counsel said that, since the entire police team was involved, Bhardwaj was produced virtually before the magistrate the day before yesterday, physically yesterday and virtually again today. He was then remanded to 14 days' judicial custody. The High Court said we should challenge that order. We were arguing that since this FIR had been quashed, there was no basis for arrest and therefore the arrest was illegal." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

363,343 views • 21 days ago

#WATCH | Chandigarh: Advocate Jitender Khurana, representing Dera Sacha Sauda, says, "Punjab Government filed an appeal before the Supreme Court over the stay imposed by (Punjab and Haryana) High Court on proceedings in the Bargari sacrilege cases, they presented one-sided facts in that plea. They concealed facts from the Supreme Court. Hearing the matter, Supreme Court issued notice and sought a reply within 4 weeks. We will file our reply very soon with all the facts...We are confident that after hearing of all facts the decision will come in our favour and we will get justice by the Supreme Court...Dera Sacha Sauda or Guruji (Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh) have nothing to do with sacrilege, they are not involved..."

#WATCH | Chandigarh: Advocate Jitender Khurana, representing Dera Sacha Sauda, says, "Punjab Government filed an appeal before the Supreme Court over the stay imposed by (Punjab and Haryana) High Court on proceedings in the Bargari sacrilege cases, they presented one-sided facts in that plea. They concealed facts from the Supreme Court. Hearing the matter, Supreme Court issued notice and sought a reply within 4 weeks. We will file our reply very soon with all the facts...We are confident that after hearing of all facts the decision will come in our favour and we will get justice by the Supreme Court...Dera Sacha Sauda or Guruji (Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh) have nothing to do with sacrilege, they are not involved..."

ANI

10,489 views • 1 year ago

We are here because people didn't fully understand why their votes counted. Why sitting out elections has consequences, and how voting based on excitement is harmful. Now here we are, with not only a conservative Supreme Court, but a Supreme Court hell-bent on taking away progress. Voting Rights Act ensured that Black people had a voice. That we were represented. The Supreme Court has limited it. This does not mean stop voting. It means that we have to register more people to vote, we have to overwhelm the system. #DemsUnited

We are here because people didn't fully understand why their votes counted. Why sitting out elections has consequences, and how voting based on excitement is harmful. Now here we are, with not only a conservative Supreme Court, but a Supreme Court hell-bent on taking away progress. Voting Rights Act ensured that Black people had a voice. That we were represented. The Supreme Court has limited it. This does not mean stop voting. It means that we have to register more people to vote, we have to overwhelm the system. #DemsUnited

LanaQuest aka RosaSparks

16,730 views • 5 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court asking High Courts to decide contempt petitions over the alleged violation of bulldozer action guidelines, Advocate Anas Tanweer says, “After the bulldozer guidelines were issued, there were certain states that did not follow those guidelines… Today, the Supreme Court, taking into account that there could be questions of fact—and the Supreme Court will not go into questions of fact—has remanded those matters to the jurisdictional High Courts. It has given them the power to entertain it as contempt of this Court, as well as asked them to take help from the sessions judge or the district judge concerned in case of fact-finding. The grievance must be addressed in the High Courts first, and obviously, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against their order can be filed before the Supreme Court if the state or the parties are not satisfied.”

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court asking High Courts to decide contempt petitions over the alleged violation of bulldozer action guidelines, Advocate Anas Tanweer says, “After the bulldozer guidelines were issued, there were certain states that did not follow those guidelines… Today, the Supreme Court, taking into account that there could be questions of fact—and the Supreme Court will not go into questions of fact—has remanded those matters to the jurisdictional High Courts. It has given them the power to entertain it as contempt of this Court, as well as asked them to take help from the sessions judge or the district judge concerned in case of fact-finding. The grievance must be addressed in the High Courts first, and obviously, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against their order can be filed before the Supreme Court if the state or the parties are not satisfied.”

ANI

31,780 views • 2 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Supreme Court hearing on the Jantar Mantar protest, Advocate Shailendra Mani Tripathi says, “The Solicitor General gave an assurance that instructions have been sought from the Police Commissioner and the concerned agencies. However, those instructions have not yet been received. He said that the reply is being prepared on behalf of the Police Commissioner and that it will be filed before the Court later. On our side, Senior Advocate Gopal Shankar Narayan appeared for us. He sought certain directions before the Court, including that it be brought on record under whose orders pellet guns were used and under whose orders force was employed. That was our primary demand.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Supreme Court hearing on the Jantar Mantar protest, Advocate Shailendra Mani Tripathi says, “The Solicitor General gave an assurance that instructions have been sought from the Police Commissioner and the concerned agencies. However, those instructions have not yet been received. He said that the reply is being prepared on behalf of the Police Commissioner and that it will be filed before the Court later. On our side, Senior Advocate Gopal Shankar Narayan appeared for us. He sought certain directions before the Court, including that it be brought on record under whose orders pellet guns were used and under whose orders force was employed. That was our primary demand.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

21,854 views • 1 month ago

Q: I'm curious what you make, whether you agree with the president and what he said about his three Supreme Court nominees that: they are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court. They are merely a shell of their original selves Blanche: He is very frustrated. He has every right, and indeed, he should communicate his concerns with the Supreme Court whenever he has them. This isn't the first time that he's done it, and it won't be the last. He's also publicly very appreciative of the Supreme Court when when there's decisions that he very much agrees with—that's what a democracy is about

Q: I'm curious what you make, whether you agree with the president and what he said about his three Supreme Court nominees that: they are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court. They are merely a shell of their original selves Blanche: He is very frustrated. He has every right, and indeed, he should communicate his concerns with the Supreme Court whenever he has them. This isn't the first time that he's done it, and it won't be the last. He's also publicly very appreciative of the Supreme Court when when there's decisions that he very much agrees with—that's what a democracy is about

Acyn

62,118 views • 12 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court orders and protesters' demands, Cockroach Janta Party Chief Spokesperson Saurav Das says, “If the Supreme Court is acting in the interest of the youth, we welcome such orders or judgments… We, on the other hand, have been active on the ground for a long time, and we have certain demands that must be met; that is the most important thing. One of our key demands was that all FIRs against protesters be withdrawn and that the government refrain from taking any retaliatory action against any protester in the future. We expected a written guarantee regarding this to be issued by today (Tuesday), and for all those detained or arrested to be released… We held a press conference yesterday evening where we announced that if the government fails to keep its word, we will be compelled to call for a major protest in Delhi once again… Whatever the Supreme Court says should be ‘in addition’ to our demands. Our demands must be met first; the government should then comply with whatever the Supreme Court says or whatever relief it grants. That is our demand.”

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court orders and protesters' demands, Cockroach Janta Party Chief Spokesperson Saurav Das says, “If the Supreme Court is acting in the interest of the youth, we welcome such orders or judgments… We, on the other hand, have been active on the ground for a long time, and we have certain demands that must be met; that is the most important thing. One of our key demands was that all FIRs against protesters be withdrawn and that the government refrain from taking any retaliatory action against any protester in the future. We expected a written guarantee regarding this to be issued by today (Tuesday), and for all those detained or arrested to be released… We held a press conference yesterday evening where we announced that if the government fails to keep its word, we will be compelled to call for a major protest in Delhi once again… Whatever the Supreme Court says should be ‘in addition’ to our demands. Our demands must be met first; the government should then comply with whatever the Supreme Court says or whatever relief it grants. That is our demand.”

ANI

417,175 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP and Chairman of Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra, says, "The Supreme Court has taken this episode very seriously and an order for inquiry has been made. The Solicitor General was personally present in the court. He was very positive about it. He also said that we are going to find out who is responsible for this and those involved will be nabbed and appropriate action, serious action will be taken against them...Whatever books have been released, they should be withdrawn...The Bar is very much agitated against it. This action, the Bar cannot accept. Almost all the leaders of the Bar were present in the court and they were also assisting the Supreme Court in passing such an order. The bar is of the view that the move of the NCERT is very objectionable and serious action should be taken..."

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP and Chairman of Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra, says, "The Supreme Court has taken this episode very seriously and an order for inquiry has been made. The Solicitor General was personally present in the court. He was very positive about it. He also said that we are going to find out who is responsible for this and those involved will be nabbed and appropriate action, serious action will be taken against them...Whatever books have been released, they should be withdrawn...The Bar is very much agitated against it. This action, the Bar cannot accept. Almost all the leaders of the Bar were present in the court and they were also assisting the Supreme Court in passing such an order. The bar is of the view that the move of the NCERT is very objectionable and serious action should be taken..."

ANI

50,879 views • 7 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: CJP chief spokesperson Saurav Das on the Supreme Court hearing on alleged police brutality against NEET paper leak protesters, says, "If the Supreme Court feels that justice for the protesters and the country's youth can be ensured only through a high-powered committee, then what can we say? That will be the Court's decision. However, the demand of the youth-led movement and the entire younger generation is that the high-powered committee must be independent, and the integrity of the people appointed to it must be unimpeachable, with very high standards. Their past records should also reflect their independence. If people against whom serious questions have already been raised are appointed, we will not accept it." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: CJP chief spokesperson Saurav Das on the Supreme Court hearing on alleged police brutality against NEET paper leak protesters, says, "If the Supreme Court feels that justice for the protesters and the country's youth can be ensured only through a high-powered committee, then what can we say? That will be the Court's decision. However, the demand of the youth-led movement and the entire younger generation is that the high-powered committee must be independent, and the integrity of the people appointed to it must be unimpeachable, with very high standards. Their past records should also reflect their independence. If people against whom serious questions have already been raised are appointed, we will not accept it." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

82,747 views • 1 month ago

VIDEO | BJP leader Vijay Goel (Vijay Goel) on meeting Union Minister for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying Rajiv Ranjan Singh, says, "The issues of stray dogs are being faced in the entire world, and today, we met Union Minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh to discuss this. We told him that since the Supreme Court has given its verdict, there is no point in the Animal Birth Control (ABC) rules because they contradict... The Supreme Court has said that any stray dogs that are aggressive can be put in shelters. However, ABC rules don't state the same. So animal rights activists misguide people... So, we have asked the minister to take appropriate steps to protect people from these aggressive stray dogs." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | BJP leader Vijay Goel (Vijay Goel) on meeting Union Minister for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying Rajiv Ranjan Singh, says, "The issues of stray dogs are being faced in the entire world, and today, we met Union Minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh to discuss this. We told him that since the Supreme Court has given its verdict, there is no point in the Animal Birth Control (ABC) rules because they contradict... The Supreme Court has said that any stray dogs that are aggressive can be put in shelters. However, ABC rules don't state the same. So animal rights activists misguide people... So, we have asked the minister to take appropriate steps to protect people from these aggressive stray dogs." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

33,349 views • 1 year ago