Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Videodrome (1983) 🕯️📹 Released on February 4, 1983, “Videodrome” faced a difficult theatrical run due to its transgressive content but eventually found a massive second life through home video and high-quality restorations. The film opened in 600 theaters across North America. It debuted at number 8 on the box...

16,931 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Angel (1984) Released on January 13, 1984, Angel is an American exploitation slasher thriller that became a defining "sleeper hit" of the 1980s. It was the first film released by New World Pictures after the studio was sold by its founder, Roger Corman. The film mixed a gritty, "sleazy" premise with a "found family" of colorful street characters, including an aging cowboy (Rory Calhoun) and a flamboyant drag queen (Dick Shawn). The blend of "Afterschool Special" sweetness and "sleaze-fest" violence created a jarring but memorable experience that helped the film stand out from typical 1980s slashers. Despite failing to open in the top five, Angel was a major financial success. It grossed $2.2 million in its opening weekend and stayed in the top ten for several months, eventually earning $17.5 million domestically. It was New World's highest-grossing release of 1984. The film thrived during the 1980s VHS boom, where its lurid cover art and exploitation themes helped it populate video store shelves. This popularity led to three sequels: Avenging Angel (1985), Angel III: The Final Chapter (1988), and Angel 4: Undercover (1994), though the latter two were straight-to-video releases. Today, Angel is considered a prime example of '80s "sleaze-fest" cinema with a surprising amount of heart. Its cult following is driven by its campy "instant characters," its unpretentious tone, and its depiction of a now-gone era of Hollywood Boulevard. Its enduring status is reflected in modern high-definition re-releases from boutique labels like Vinegar Syndrome, which released a dedicated "Angel Collection" Blu-ray set in 2020.

Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱

87,122 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Class of 1984 (1982) Class of 1984 was a commercial success relative to its modest $3.2–$4.3 million budget, earning over $6–$7 million at the box office. It achieved broader financial success through the home video and cable markets, estimated at $15–$20 million in total. The film is celebrated as a definitive cult classic of the early 1980s. Its "video nasty" reputation stemmed from extreme violence, including a graphic table saw death and a brutal rape scene, which nearly earned it an X rating. Modern audiences value it as a bleak, nihilistic time capsule of the early '80s punk aesthetic and urban decay. It is famous for featuring a young, pre-Family Ties Michael J. Fox in a supporting role. Its status is solidified by high-end boutique releases, such as the Shout! Factory Collector’s Edition. The film was directly influenced by A Clockwork Orange (1971) and Blackboard Jungle (1955). In turn, it influenced several "school violence" and vigilante films: It spawned two sci-fi-themed sequels: Class of 1999 (1990) and Class of 1999 II: The Substitute (1994). Films like The Principal (1987), The Substitute (1996), and Class of Nuke 'Em High (1986) are often cited as spiritual successors or parodies. Timothy Van Patten, who played the menacing gang leader Peter Stegman, is now better known as an Emmy-winning director of prestigious series like The Sopranos and Boardwalk Empire. Van Patten personally wrote and performed the piano concerto his character plays in the film, a scene often cited as a highlight that revealed Stegman's complex, "yuppie" background. While director Mark Lester expected Van Patten to become a major acting star following his "riveting" performance, Van Patten eventually found his greatest success behind the camera. His portrayal remains iconic for its use of low-angle shots to maximize his threatening presence despite his clean-cut appearance.

Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱

11,070 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Scream 4 (2011) Scream 4 stands as a pivotal entry in the iconic slasher franchise. Though it initially struggled at the box office, the film has since garnered a significant cult following, largely due to its surprisingly prescient themes. The movie marked the return of original director Wes Craven and writer Kevin Williamson, who envisioned Scream 4 as the launchpad for a new trilogy. Before production began, Kevin Williamson "sketched out" concepts for Scream 5 and 6. In Williamson’s original concept, Jill Roberts was supposed to survive the events of Scream 4 and "get away with it all". The planned sequel, Scream 5, would have followed Jill as a "hero" at college, only to be stalked by a new Ghostface who knew the truth about her crimes. These plans were abandoned due to the film's lower-than-expected domestic box office performance and the passing of Wes Craven in 2015. The production of Scream 4 was notoriously difficult. Extensive script rewrites by Ehren Kruger (who penned Scream 3) occurred throughout filming. Early 2011 test screenings further necessitated four days of reshoots for two key sequences involving Aimee Teegarden and Alison Brie. Craven utilized computer-generated effects for the first time, adding knife blades in post-production to facilitate safer and more aggressive stabbing scenes. Unlike the California setting of the original, Scream 4 was filmed entirely in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, chosen by the production team for its close resemblance to the fictional "Woodsboro." Despite its ambition, Scream 4's theatrical performance was underwhelming. It remains the only film in the series not to surpass the $100 million mark. Analysts attributed this lukewarm reception to an 11-year gap since Scream 3, an aging fan base, and stiff competition from Insidious, which dominated the horror market at the time. Despite its disappointing theatrical run, Scream 4 found greater success on home media. It debuted at #2 on the U.S. rental charts and remained in the top 20 for seven consecutive weeks, generating approximately $10.3 million in domestic DVD and Blu-ray sales. The Blu-ray release further catered to fans with 17 deleted/extended scenes, a gag reel, and an alternate opening/ending, offering a glimpse into the troubled production's original vision. Over time, modern audiences have reappraised Scream 4. Its commentary on social media fame and "remake" culture, which was considered confusing or cynical in 2011, is now seen as remarkably prescient. Hayden Panettiere’s character, Kirby, instantly became a fan favorite, ultimately leading to her highly anticipated return in Scream VI. While Scream 4 temporarily "killed" the franchise until the 2022 reboot, many fans now rank it among the best sequels for its bold "Jill Roberts" reveal and sharp meta-commentary, recognizing its ahead-of-its-time themes and enduring impact.

Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱

15,420 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Lipstick (1976) A controversial rape-and-revenge thriller directed by Lamont Johnson. Despite being panned by critics upon its release, the film has since developed a significant cult following. Margaux Hemingway, in her film debut, the 1970s supermodel played Chris McCormick, a high-fashion model who seeks justice after being assaulted. While her beauty was praised, critics widely criticized her acting as stiff and unconvincing. Margaux’s 14-year-old sister also made her debut, playing Chris's younger sister Kathy. In a reversal of expectations, Mariel received critical acclaim and a Golden Globe nomination, which reportedly caused professional tension between the sisters. The film featured established stars including Anne Bancroft as a determined district attorney and Chris Sarandon as the brutal music teacher. The film was largely a failure at the time of its release for several reasons. Critics like Roger Ebert and those at Variety condemned the film as "cynical exploitation," arguing it used a serious subject to pander to voyeuristic interests through graphic nudity and violence. Reviewers found the narrative uneven, moving from a glossy fashion-world drama to a brutal courtroom procedural, and finally to a "Rambo-like" vigilante ending that many felt lacked credibility. (Personally, this is exactly what I like about it). Its depiction of a victim taking the law into her own hands after a legal failure was highly polarizing in 1976. Despite its initial failure, Lipstick gained cult status over the following decades. Modern viewers often view the film as an early, if flawed, attempt to address the "real horror story" of the judicial system's failure to protect women. The film is remembered for its slick 1970s Los Angeles aesthetic and its avant-garde synthesizer soundtrack by French musician Michel Polnareff, which became a disco hit in its own right. Filmmakers such as Quentin Tarantino and Edgar Wright have cited the film as a notable example of the genre, further solidifying its place in cult cinema history.

Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱

100,285 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

* NEW FROM THE CHIRLA FILES * CHIRLA, the taxpayer-funded nonprofit that has been fomenting opposition to immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, owns a film production company that has produced a full-length feature. CHIRLA’s “beleaguered” Executive Director, Angelica Salas, is credited as the Executive Producer of the movie. Seems strange for a nonprofit, right? Pouring over its publicly available financial records, there appear to be a number of irregularities—though I do not have the expertise to form a definitive opinion about whether there was actual malfeasance. Here are the details. As background to CHIRLA’s film-making enterprise: In 2018, the organization produced a 20-minute short called “America, I Too,” which was shown at some film festivals. According to its website, this was “the second film in the series following the first short, ‘Know Your Rights’ created in 2007.” The video by that name that I found online is ten minutes long and has poor production values. CHIRLA incorporated its film company, called CHIRLA Liberty Film, LLC, in January 2019. It is entirely owned by the nonprofit, and its finances are consolidated in CHIRLA’s financial audits. The audit for the year ending June 30, 2019, lists film production costs in the amount of $242,413 and $28,764 from 2018, noting that they relate to the “various costs associated with the production of a film.” The audit, however, does not mention the existence of the film company. Strangely, CHIRLA’s Form 990 (the tax form filed by nonprofits with the IRS) for 2019 also does not reference either the company or the costs of film production. Every year beginning in 2019, CHIRLA’s audits state: “Upon completion of the film, the Organization will review its total revenue estimates from the film, which may result in a change in the rate of amortization and/or a write-down of the film production costs to fair value.” But confusingly, there are never any revenue estimates provided in any audit. The cost of the film production is simply listed as an asset each year. CHIRLA’s 2020 audit is the first to acknowledge the existence of the film company: “CHIRLA has teamed up with CHIRLA Liberty Films LLC to bring to life a dramatized film series about undocumented immigrants called Know Your Rights.” It’s a strange statement, given that the “Know Your Rights” video was produced in 2007. The 2020 audit lists $124,483 as an additional investment in the production of the unnamed film, and the Form 990 for that year lists a cumulative investment in film production of $366,896. Its financials for 2021 are essentially consistent, showing an additional $419,052 spent on the film, totaling $785,948. CHIRLA’s 2022 audit adds $151,658 in production costs, and the 2023 audit adds another $109,437, for a grand total of $1,047,043. Both audits state that the film still had not been completed as of June 30 of their respective years. But contradictorily, CHIRLA’s feature-length film—titled “America’s Family”—is listed on IMDb with a release date in 2022, and there are websites advertising showings in Los Angeles and Boston in June 2022—prior to June 30. Though CHIRLA’s Form 990s for 2020 and 2021 list a dollar value under “Investment in Liberty Film,” the Form 990s for 2022 and 2023 include no record of the investment in film production or acknowledgment of the wholly owned film company. After the initial showing of “America’s Family” in June 2022, the film had a number of additional showings in late 2023. In late 2024, CHIRLA presented the film for free or low cost at several local community centers in Mexico. It is now available for streaming on Amazon Prime. I know little about the film industry, but my suspicion is that the company may have spent more on these screenings than it earned in revenue. This brings me back to the auditor’s recurring statement: “Upon completion of the film, the Organization will review its total revenue estimates from the film, which may result in a change in the rate of amortization and/or a write-down of the film production costs to fair value.” Again, the audit does not include revenue estimates, so it is difficult to guess what this refers to. The $1 million spent on film production was considered an asset on financials. On what planet would this film break even? And what is the movie like? Judging from the trailer, it’s clichéd propaganda. It presents an idyllic life of a Spanish-speaking “American” family, suddenly torn apart by brutal ICE agents. You can judge its artistic merit for yourself. More important will be the judgment about the legality of CHIRLA’s financial filings.

Laura Powell

23,203 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Fog (1980) The Fog had a limited release on February 1, 1980, before expanding nationwide on February 8, 1980. It was originally scheduled for Christmas 1979 but was delayed to avoid heavy competition. The idea for the movie was born during a trip to England when John Carpenter and producer/co-writer Debra Hill visited Stonehenge. Witnessing an eerie mist rolling over the landscape, Carpenter famously asked, "What do you think is in that fog?" He also drew inspiration from the 1958 film The Trollenberg Terror, which featured monsters hiding in clouds. After viewing the initial rough cut, Carpenter was horrified, calling it "terrible" and noting it lacked scares and proper pacing. To save the project, he and Hill spent an additional $200,000 on massive reshoots just a month before the release date. Roughly one-third of the final film consists of reshoots. Key additions include: - The iconic campfire prologue with John Houseman. - The morgue scene where a corpse suddenly reanimates. - Stevie Wayne's lighthouse confrontation with the ghosts (originally, she never encountered them). - Footage of meat hooks and physical contact was added to compete with the rising popularity of "slasher" films. Despite mixed reviews from critics like Roger Ebert, who found the premise weak, the film was a major commercial success. It grossed approximately $21.3 million domestically against a modest $1.1 million budget. The Fog became a staple of the early home video era, first appearing on VHS and Betamax in late 1980. Subsequent high-definition re-releases, including a 4K UHD edition from Scream Factory in 2022, have kept it in the public eye. While initially seen as a "tame" follow-up to Carpenter’s Halloween, it is now revered as a cult classic for its masterclass in building dread. The 1980 original’s legacy was actually strengthened by the failure of the 2005 remake. The film solidified a unique piece of horror history by featuring Janet Leigh (Psycho) and Jamie Lee Curtis (Halloween) together. This "passing of the torch" between mother and daughter created a legacy of horror royalty that fans still celebrate at conventions today.

Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱

15,850 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten