Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

VS. REWRITE - TRINITY (vocal dub) no tts involved, just copious fx #rewritesweep #fridaynightfunkin #sonicexe

16,685 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

4 Comments

CrazyMonkey's profile picture
CrazyMonkey1 year ago

The vocals by themself are really good, I just think they’re kinda drowned by the effects you put on them (no offense to you ofc!) Overall could use some decreasing on the mixing percentage and you’re golden!

Cacx101's profile picture
Cacx1011 year ago

dude this is insane how involved Was this ??

wrathstetic (3/4 SLOTS OPEN) 🍉's profile picture
wrathstetic (3/4 SLOTS OPEN) 🍉1 year ago

wdym

Edd's profile picture
Edd1 year ago

just wish they were a bit easier to hear but other than that its great

Related Videos

VoxCPM 2 just dropped by OpenBMB Only 2B-param open-source TTS (Text-to-Speech) model built for production-grade multilingual voice work. Apache-2.0 license, Can run on only 8GB VRAM. • Eliminates the "robotic" feel of traditional TTS, delivering prosody and emotional depth suitable for high-stakes professional environments like filmmaking, gaming, animation, and audiobooks. • 30-language multilingual: no language tag needed, just type in a supported language and generate directly. • Voice design: create a brand-new voice from a text description alone, like age, tone, pace, or emotion. No reference audio required. Describe the desired voice characteristics (gender, age, tone, emotion, pace …) in Control Instruction, and VoxCPM2 will craft a unique voice from your description alone. • Controllable cloning: clone from a short clip, then steer delivery style without losing the speaker’s core voice. • Ultimate cloning: use reference audio + transcript for continuation-style cloning that keeps the tiny vocal details. • 48kHz output: takes 16kHz reference audio and produces studio-quality speech without an external upsampler. • Real-time ready: around 0.3 RTF on RTX 4090, even lower with Nano-VLLM. • Commercial use: Apache-2.0 licensed. Developer-Friendly Infrastructure: - Native Torch Inference: Direct support for PyTorch-based workflows. - Training Flexibility: Supports both full-parameter and LoRA fine-tuning for specific domain adaptation. - Production Readiness: Compatible with voxcpm-nanovllm for large-scale, high-concurrency deployment.

Rohan Paul

13,541 views • 3 months ago

Megyn Kelly has now outflanked Nick Fuentes. She didn't just support Candace Owens's "questions" about Israeli involvement in Charlie's murder. Megyn Kelly said she also has "questions." Even Fuentes blasted such "questions" as just asserting "that Israel killed Charlie." A week after Charlie was assassinated, Fuentes ridiculed Candace Owens for claiming that she had never accused Israel of being involved. "For literally the past week, uninterrupted, nonstop, [Candace Owens] has been pushing this narrative on her show that Israel killed Charlie Kirk." As Fuentes noted then, and has doubled down on as recently as last month in also attacking Ian Carroll, there is "zero evidence" Israel had anything to do with Charlie's murder — adding that it would make no sense, given that Charlie was one of Israel's most vocal and important supporters. Yet Megyn Kelly evidently disagrees. She told Tucker Carlson that she has "questions about what if anyone aligned with Israel or from Israel might have had to do with Charlie's death. I think it was Tyler Robinson... but, ehhh... I got, I have an open heart to [the idea] he was manipulated by somebody, I do." The very idea that Israel would want Charlie is so outrageous, Fuentes explained, that anyone who "takes [Candace] seriously" is a "sucker." "If any person takes this person seriously after this, you are a sucker. This person (Candace) should have zero credibility going forward... There is no evidence for this theory."

Joel Mowbray

28,737 views • 6 months ago

This is BIGGER than we could have EVER IMAGINED, with multiple countries involved and even possible weapons TRAFFICKING as well. Charlie Kirk also messaged his security detail the night before he died, named "DAN," after he got off the phone with one of his donors and texted Dan telling him that "THEY" were going to kill him TOMORROW. Why hasn't Dan come forward about this and who is "THEY" exactly? I think we already know the answer to that question. Candace lays out the ARMS TRAFFICKING connections and how when you have a company as big and connected as Charli, especially in all 50 states and you get approached to "do" certain things and turn it down, the complications and things that come with going against the powers that be. This connects to multiple countries including the U.S., Israel, France, and Africa and goes back decades, even to the BUSH family. This really is good vs. evil and some of these people are "playing" both sides. Do I believe TPUSA is involved with shady characters, countries, and shady illegal activity? Yes. Charlie was assassinated and nobody there even cares and is acting like nothing they do isn't extremely shady. This organized crime is nothing new, it just now got exposed in a circle you thought it could never happen in. Everyone thats trying to be politically correct or is paid off and attacking Candace is a COWARD. You should be ashamed of yourself for lying to your audience when you know damn well that there are multiple things that make no sense and multiple lies that were already exposed. Grow a pair and start fighting for the truth. Candace Owens

The SCIF

1,042,958 views • 7 months ago

Guy could you please help me make this post FLY by sharing it 🙏 This was Yesterday on talkSPORT with the legend Neil Ruddock — had to drag him along cos I know NOTHING about football! 😂 This is all for something very real — the Men And Their Emotions (MATE) charity celebrity football match at Swindon Town’s County Ground on Sunday 3rd May 2026. We’re raising funds for men’s mental health in honour of local lad Steven Bailey, who tragically took his own life earlier last year. Proceeds going straight to our M.A.T.E charity — that massive online Facebook community of around 64,000 blokes where lads can talk anonymously, share what they’re going through, and get proper support and counselling. No judgement, just real help when you need it most. This means the world to me, we’ve lost too many good lads that were just lost, if we can get more talking and supporting each other, doing counciling it’s worth every kick of the ball. It’s gonna be a cracking family fun day out — celebs vs ex-pros, loads of laughs, and hopefully some decent footy (from the pros lol) This is who we’ve more or less confirmed already (still a few spots left, so if you’ve got ideas for people, tag ’em below and if anyone can help support the event, hit us up!): Celebs Danny Dyer, Olly Murs (just watching) , Cole Anderson, Mashtag, Tom Zanetti, Matt Lapinskas, Harrison Elliott, Joe Cordina, Ryan Garner, Gaz Beadle, Daryl Robinson, Sonny Green, MC Harvey… Ex-pros/Legends: Danny Simpson, Leroy Lita, Leon Britton, Derek Asamoah, Chris Dickson, Jamie O’Hara, Razor Ruddock, Martin Offiah, Courtney Massey, Kevin Betsy, Dean Morgan… And more to be announced soon! If you fancy watching me huff and puff trying to keep up with Danny Dyer and the rest of these boys while Razor probably just stands there laughing his head off, come down — tickets in my bio/link below. It’s gonna be epic, emotional, and a proper laugh. Get involved, support the cause, and let’s look out for each other. ❤️ Search: mate charity football match See you there 💚💪⚽ #MATECharity #MensMentalHealth #CelebrityFooty

Daniel O’Reilly

42,520 views • 4 months ago

👀 This Jay-Z Interview Moment Still Doesn’t Sit Right… When Jay-Z spoke on the Super Bowl decision, he downplayed everything: •Said picking Kendrick Lamar wasn’t personal •Denied there being any alliance •And leaned on his status like: “I’m Jay-Z… why would I even care?” On the surface, that sounds confident… but when you line up the timeline, the story starts to feel a lot more layered. 🧩 The “No Alliance” Narrative vs. The Moves Let’s go back to Beyoncé’s “America Has A Problem” remix. •Kendrick didn’t just feature he came in directly addressing Drake •He even referenced asking Universal Music Group for clearance before taking shots •And importantly… Jay-Z has writing credits on that same record That’s where things get interesting. Because now it’s not just: 👉 “Kendrick vs Drake” It starts to look like: 👉 multiple powerful figures connected to the same moment That doesn’t automatically prove coordination but it definitely doesn’t feel isolated either. 📀 Drake’s Verse That Aged Different Now rewind to June 2022. Drake hops on “Churchill Downs” with Jack Harlow and drops a verse that, in hindsight, feels almost predictive: “Lucky Me, People that don’t f*** with me Are linkin’ up with people that don’t f*** with me to f*** with me…” He goes deeper into: •Things becoming “transactional” •Moves feeling “promotional” instead of organic •People acting irreplaceable when they’re not At the time, it sounded like general industry frustration… But then just one month later Beyoncé dropped America Has A Problem where: 👉 Drake A non American becomes a clear topic That tight timing makes the verse feel less random and more like: 👉 he was already peeping something forming behind the scenes 🏈 The Super Bowl Foreshadowing? Fast forward to the battle era. Kendrick’s “6:16 in LA” includes a very specific detail: 👉 the sound of a football launcher Later on… That same exact sound is used in the rollout announcing him as a Super Bowl performer Now that’s where it really gets debatable. Because that leaves two possibilities: 1.🎯 Creative coincidence Just a sound choice that happened to line up later 2.🧠 Intentional foreshadowing A subtle hint that something bigger was already locked in And when you combine that with everything else the collaborations, the timing, the people involved it’s hard to ignore. 💭 My Full Perspective Individually, each moment could be explained away: •A feature here •A lyric there •A sound effect used creatively But together? It starts to form a pattern: •Strategic collaborations •Consistent messaging •Tight timing between releases •Key industry figures overlapping in the same moments Which raises the bigger question: 👉 Was Kendrick simply moving on his own… or was he being positioned within a larger play happening behind the scenes? 🤔 End of the Day… Jay-Z says there was no alliance But when you really break everything down: …it doesn’t feel completely random either. So what do you see? 👀 Coincidence… or calculated alignment?

Cousin Tino ™️

13,163 views • 3 months ago

🎙️ The Breakfast Club Responds to Nicki Minaj vs. Trevor Noah Grammys Moment On The Breakfast Club, hosts reacted to Trevor Noah’s jokes about Nicki Minaj during the Grammy Awards and the fallout that followed. 🎤 THE GRAMMYS JOKE During his opening monologue, Trevor Noah made jokes referencing: •Nicki Minaj not attending the Grammys •Donald Trump According to The Breakfast Club, the laughter and applause were framed as: •The audience reacting to the joke itself •Charlamagne claimed people were cheering simply because Nicki wasn’t there 🗣️ CHARLAMAGNE’S TAKE Charlamagne argued: •Trevor was stating a fact Nicki wasn’t present •The joke was more of a shot at Trump than Nicki •To him The crowd reaction wasn’t orchestrated Many viewers saw this as downplaying the jab toward Nicki. 📱 NICKI MINAJ RESPONDS Nicki fired back on social media, directly addressing Trevor Noah. Her tweets included: •Accusations that Trevor refuses to “come out of the closet” •Claims that “people in the industry know” who he’s allegedly involved with 🎚️ DJ ENVY’S MOMENT During the discussion: •DJ Envy appeared to suggest there might be some truth to Nicki’s comments •Before finishing his thought, Charlamagne redirected him, telling him people don’t know and he’s just repeating what Nicki said 🤨 That moment stood out to listeners as an abrupt shutdown of the topic. 🧠 BIGGER CONVERSATION The segment raised broader questions about: •How jokes about certain artists are defended •When audience laughter is treated as “organic” vs. dismissive •Why discussions around power, gender, and sexuality get framed differently depending on who’s involved Charlamagne also criticized the weaponization of sexuality in public disputes, questioning why it becomes a go to response in industry conflicts. 🎭 CONTRASTING MOMENT Later in the show, Trevor Noah joked with Kendrick Lamar about: •Drake •Rap beef •Cultural differences The Breakfast Club praised that exchange as lighthearted and funny, highlighting the contrast in how different jokes were received. 📢 FINAL NOTE The Breakfast Club since y’all have shown you have no problem talking crazy about Black stars like Nicki Minaj and Drake, especially on day 2 of Black History Month, keep that same exact energy across the board. If names matter. If accountability matters. If “the culture” matters. Then Jay-Z shouldn’t be off limits either. His name has allegedly surfaced repeatedly: •Diddy-related files •Weinstein-related files •Epstein-related files Silence while choosing who gets dissected and who gets protected? That’s a choice. So if y’all really about conversation and not protection, keep the same energy.

Cousin Tino ™️

116,400 views • 5 months ago