Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
WAN 3.0 is seriously impressive. The video quality, references, and control make it feel like a real step forward. And the best part? You can access WAN 3.0 on the Pika API Club for less expensive than other platforms. Making powerful video models more accessible is exactly what creators need.
107,888 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
Ähnliche Videos
1:05
Sensitive content
Okay! WAN 3.0 let's go! Whenever I test a new video model, the first thing I always do is test how well it handles language nuance. And yup, WAN 3.0 did it pretty well. I tested it via Venice And nope, this is not sponsored content. I use my own money. I’ve always used Venice for some of my more erotic video work because it’s uncensored and awesome. As simple as that. 👍😎 The reason i quote this post because people keep asking like heeey where do you generate uncensored stuff. Only two places right now, either Venice or D-zine. So there you go! bUTTTT!!!! If there's more, let me know 👍 I guess I could say that WAN 3.0 is probably the closest model to Seedance 2.0 in terms of quality right now. For my very specific needs, I love making dialogue-driven scenes, and WAN 3.0 is absolutely fine for that. In fact, I have to say it’s much better than MiniMax H3 in some ways. But of course, keep in mind that every model has its own strengths and flaws. Unfortunately, when it comes to very precise, extremely dynamic scenes, like what I usually do with my Sari & Ploy series, especially fight scenes, it’s not quite there yet. The only other problem is that sometimes, if you’re unlucky, WAN 3.0 can produce this weird audio artifact. I don’t really know how to explain it. It’s kind of like that flanger-like sound you sometimes get when generating with Seedance. Yeah, WAN 3.0 can occasionally have the same problem, LOL 😆 But performance-wise, for my use case, especially conversational scenes, candid moments, and the kind of raw camera movement I’ve always loved, WAN 3.0 really delivers. For me personally, this is where things start to get really exciting, especially when I think about series production. I can now be much more strategic about which model I use for each type of scene. For example, I’ll still use Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 mainly for more extreme, dynamic fight scenes, while conversational scenes are something I can comfortably do with WAN 3.0. MiniMax H3, meanwhile, feels more like the experimental option. I personally think H3 is a very unique model. Maybe it’s not as powerful for conversational scenes, but it definitely has its own flavor and can produce things that feel different from the others. But you know what, I can’t help it. I really need to say this LOL. It’s funny how a model like Grok Imagine Video used to be sooo good, and I praised it a lot, but now it feels like an extreme slot machine. At this point, I sometimes feel like it’s mostly being hyped by people who just want to glaze Elon Musk. Somehow, it actually went backwards. 😅 And it’s interesting how models like Seedance 1.5 and the previous WAN versions have improved so much over time. It feels very ironic because I wasn’t even a fan of Seedance back then, and the same goes for WAN. But yeah, at the end of the day is the output quality that matters for me.
MXVDXN // DAN
137,999 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen
