正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

⚠️WARNING: VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED — filthy language and actions⚠️ Now imagine if I were to come out and say look at how the students of Sālih al-Fawzān are, look at how the students of Rabī bin Hādi al-Madkhali are, or Muhammad bin Hādi al-Madkhali, or Raslan, etc. “Look... what they teach,” or “look at what their Manhaj teaches or yields,” etc. This would be the epitome of dishonesty. Despite my disagreements with them, and my belief in their creedal violations — I know their manhaj does not include or promote openly being filthy degenerates in such a way. It may include minimizing and distorting the Kufr of Tawali of the Kuffār, it may include concealing the truth, it may include distorting the principles of Emān and Kufr. One thing however, to the best of my knowledge, they do not preach and teach, or support the filthy behavior, as seen in the attached video. In fact, I’d say if such actions were brought before them, they’d rebuke it in the harshest of manners. Allah Says: وَإِذَا قُلۡتُمۡ فَٱعۡدِلُواْ وَلَوۡ كَانَ ذَا قُرۡبَىٰۖ And whenever you give your word (i.e. judge between men or give evidence), say the truth even if a near relative is concerned Being just even against your ideological enemies is important, for if you were the bearer of truth, then the truth is enough of a refutation. If you resort to intentional deceit and slander, then you are following the sunnah of the Kuffar of Quraysh. May Allah guide the sincere ones involved in this slander and deception against our beloved Shaykh Ahmad Musa Jibril حفظه الله تعالى, and if not, make it a means of a painful punishment for them in this Dunya and Ākhirah.show more

Project Guiding Light

7,530 subscribers

21,733 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Our, Shaikh, the ʿAllāmah, Rabeeʿ Ibn Hādī Al-Madkhalī (may Allāh preserve him) said in some powerful words: "The Salafis in the east of the world and its west, the Arabs and non-Arabs—all of them are as if they are one family. The Indian [Salafi] is united with the Saudi, with the Yemeni, and so on, with all races and all nations. They are as brothers as if nurtured at the hands of one scholar—upon one manhaj, one ʿaqeedah—and the way they deal with events and tribulations, subhānallāh, [even though] one is in the east, one in the west, and the other in the Hijāz, [regardless] their view is the same. Why? Because their manhaj is precise and proper—all of them—and they take from the same fountain. May Allah bless you. I have seen that the Salafis: those in the north, the south, the east and the west—all of them are brothers, may Allah bless you. The Shaikhs of the north are the Shaikhs of the south, and the Shaikhs of the south are the Shaikhs of the north—they are all united. No one says [only] Shaikh so-and-so or [only] so-and-so. You will not find this [among them] — rather, all of them are his shaikhs, and students of knowledge—and all of them are his brothers, may Allah bless you. Now, I advise the youth with this brotherhood—and not to separate between the Saudi, or the Yemeni, or the Hindi, or the Pakistani, or the Sindhi, or the American—all of them are brothers for the sake of Allah, joined together with the bond of Islam, and the bond of this methodology (manhaj)."

Our, Shaikh, the ʿAllāmah, Rabeeʿ Ibn Hādī Al-Madkhalī (may Allāh preserve him) said in some powerful words: "The Salafis in the east of the world and its west, the Arabs and non-Arabs—all of them are as if they are one family. The Indian [Salafi] is united with the Saudi, with the Yemeni, and so on, with all races and all nations. They are as brothers as if nurtured at the hands of one scholar—upon one manhaj, one ʿaqeedah—and the way they deal with events and tribulations, subhānallāh, [even though] one is in the east, one in the west, and the other in the Hijāz, [regardless] their view is the same. Why? Because their manhaj is precise and proper—all of them—and they take from the same fountain. May Allah bless you. I have seen that the Salafis: those in the north, the south, the east and the west—all of them are brothers, may Allah bless you. The Shaikhs of the north are the Shaikhs of the south, and the Shaikhs of the south are the Shaikhs of the north—they are all united. No one says [only] Shaikh so-and-so or [only] so-and-so. You will not find this [among them] — rather, all of them are his shaikhs, and students of knowledge—and all of them are his brothers, may Allah bless you. Now, I advise the youth with this brotherhood—and not to separate between the Saudi, or the Yemeni, or the Hindi, or the Pakistani, or the Sindhi, or the American—all of them are brothers for the sake of Allah, joined together with the bond of Islam, and the bond of this methodology (manhaj)."

Abu Khadeejah SP

70,720 次观看 • 1 年前

Ibn Taymiyya: Ahl as-Sunnah DOES NOT assist the kuffār or prefer the dominance of kufr against the Shia. --- "Even if it were assumed that the Muslims were wrongdoers, sinners, and openly committing types of Bid'a worse than the cursing of ‘Alī and ‘Uthmān – an intelligent person would still weigh between the greater of two benefits and the worse of two harms. 'Don’t you see that Ahl as-Sunnah, even though they say what they say about the Khawārij and Rawāfiḍh, and other groups of Bid'ah – still do not assist the kuffār in (giving victory to) their religion, nor do they prefer the dominance of kufr and its people over the dominance of a Bid'a less than kufr?'" (Minhaj al-Sunnah)

Ibn Taymiyya: Ahl as-Sunnah DOES NOT assist the kuffār or prefer the dominance of kufr against the Shia. --- "Even if it were assumed that the Muslims were wrongdoers, sinners, and openly committing types of Bid'a worse than the cursing of ‘Alī and ‘Uthmān – an intelligent person would still weigh between the greater of two benefits and the worse of two harms. 'Don’t you see that Ahl as-Sunnah, even though they say what they say about the Khawārij and Rawāfiḍh, and other groups of Bid'ah – still do not assist the kuffār in (giving victory to) their religion, nor do they prefer the dominance of kufr and its people over the dominance of a Bid'a less than kufr?'" (Minhaj al-Sunnah)

Halal Zoomer

11,975 次观看 • 6 天前

Chamath: Donors should sue the SPLC “ These NGOs have completely run amok. They're cosplaying as these overlords and power brokers in our lives, and it needs to get stopped. They should all be dismantled. The people that donated to the SPLC should sue them. Rip open all of the documentation, get their money back. If you are listening or watching, and you have donated, there's $822 million of your money sitting in an offshore bank account waiting for you to get it back. And then separately, if you are thinking of donating to any of these organizations in the future, unless there is a full transparent auditing of it, you actually may be doing the opposite of what you thought. If you are against racism, you may be supporting racism. If you are against discrimination for gays, this could be actually promoting discrimination for gays. If you are supportive of trans rights, this may be pushing back against trans rights. Because the playbook seems to be: do the opposite to create the narrative, give it to your friends in the media who will look the other way and amplify it, tell the lie, create the craziness, and then raise a bunch of money, make a bunch of stink, and try to curate power.”

Chamath: Donors should sue the SPLC “ These NGOs have completely run amok. They're cosplaying as these overlords and power brokers in our lives, and it needs to get stopped. They should all be dismantled. The people that donated to the SPLC should sue them. Rip open all of the documentation, get their money back. If you are listening or watching, and you have donated, there's $822 million of your money sitting in an offshore bank account waiting for you to get it back. And then separately, if you are thinking of donating to any of these organizations in the future, unless there is a full transparent auditing of it, you actually may be doing the opposite of what you thought. If you are against racism, you may be supporting racism. If you are against discrimination for gays, this could be actually promoting discrimination for gays. If you are supportive of trans rights, this may be pushing back against trans rights. Because the playbook seems to be: do the opposite to create the narrative, give it to your friends in the media who will look the other way and amplify it, tell the lie, create the craziness, and then raise a bunch of money, make a bunch of stink, and try to curate power.”

The All-In Podcast

63,741 次观看 • 2 个月前

NEW: Important Advice to Maḏhab Fanatics by Shaykh Sulaymān al-Ruḥaylī 1. We study the fiqh that was known to the Companions, and known to the Tābiʿīn, and known to the Imāms. 2. We study fiqh that is connected to evidence and built upon proof. This is the legitimate Sharʿī fiqh—the fiqh whose practitioner is praised, whose action is commended, and which is true understanding of the religion of Allāh. 3. As for binding people to a single Maḏhab from which they may not depart, and obligating them to adhere to everything stated within it, then this is an innovation—an innovation that did not exist in the time of the Companions. Rather, the Companions used to forbid it. It did not exist in the time of the Tābiʿīn, nor in the time of the four Imāms. In fact, the four Imāms were united upon forbidding the sanctification of people’s statements; rather, matters are to be examined in light of their evidence. 4. It is authentically reported from the four Imāms that they said: "If the Ḥadīth is authentic, then it is my Maḏhab." 5. Evidence for this is that the students who were raised upon the teachings of the four Imāms did not sanctify the Imām's opinion; rather, they would sometimes differ with the Imām's opinion. Anyone with even minimal exposure to the books of jurisprudence will find this clear and evident. 6. The four Imāms did not teach their students to sanctify their opinions. Rather, they taught them to look to the evidence and to support the evidence. Whoever examines the books of the Maḏhabs will find this plainly evident. 7. If you look into the books of the Ḥanafīs, you will find that Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan sometimes differed with Abū Ḥanīfah, and that Abū Yusuf sometimes differed, and that Zufar sometimes differed. 8. If you look at the statements of ibn al-ʿArabī al-Malikī, and Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, you will find this clearly evident. This is how Imām Mālik nurtured his students. Imām Mālik would sometimes not hold a particular view, but when a Ḥadīth reached him, he deemed it sound and adopted it. The same applies to al-Shāfiʿī when you look at his students, and likewise Imām Aḥmad. 9. The strict obligation to adhere to Maḏhabs in such a way that one may not depart from them only arose among the later scholars. We, in reality, do not condemn following a Maḏhab or affiliating oneself with a Maḏhab —this is a permissible matter according to what is well known among the scholars. Rather, what is blameworthy is fanaticism to Maḏhabs, and tying fiqh to Maḏhabs in such a way that one does not go beyond them and does not consider the evidence at all. Instead, issues are decided solely by the statements of the scholars of the Maḏhabs. 10. Following a Maḏhab, according to the scholars, if taken as a path to fiqh and not as fiqh itself, they do not condemn it. But if it is taken as the fiqh itself, and one restricts himself to it—indeed, even casting doubt upon what people know of rulings established upon evidence—then this is not permissible, and it is not the praiseworthy fiqh.

NEW: Important Advice to Maḏhab Fanatics by Shaykh Sulaymān al-Ruḥaylī 1. We study the fiqh that was known to the Companions, and known to the Tābiʿīn, and known to the Imāms. 2. We study fiqh that is connected to evidence and built upon proof. This is the legitimate Sharʿī fiqh—the fiqh whose practitioner is praised, whose action is commended, and which is true understanding of the religion of Allāh. 3. As for binding people to a single Maḏhab from which they may not depart, and obligating them to adhere to everything stated within it, then this is an innovation—an innovation that did not exist in the time of the Companions. Rather, the Companions used to forbid it. It did not exist in the time of the Tābiʿīn, nor in the time of the four Imāms. In fact, the four Imāms were united upon forbidding the sanctification of people’s statements; rather, matters are to be examined in light of their evidence. 4. It is authentically reported from the four Imāms that they said: "If the Ḥadīth is authentic, then it is my Maḏhab." 5. Evidence for this is that the students who were raised upon the teachings of the four Imāms did not sanctify the Imām's opinion; rather, they would sometimes differ with the Imām's opinion. Anyone with even minimal exposure to the books of jurisprudence will find this clear and evident. 6. The four Imāms did not teach their students to sanctify their opinions. Rather, they taught them to look to the evidence and to support the evidence. Whoever examines the books of the Maḏhabs will find this plainly evident. 7. If you look into the books of the Ḥanafīs, you will find that Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan sometimes differed with Abū Ḥanīfah, and that Abū Yusuf sometimes differed, and that Zufar sometimes differed. 8. If you look at the statements of ibn al-ʿArabī al-Malikī, and Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, you will find this clearly evident. This is how Imām Mālik nurtured his students. Imām Mālik would sometimes not hold a particular view, but when a Ḥadīth reached him, he deemed it sound and adopted it. The same applies to al-Shāfiʿī when you look at his students, and likewise Imām Aḥmad. 9. The strict obligation to adhere to Maḏhabs in such a way that one may not depart from them only arose among the later scholars. We, in reality, do not condemn following a Maḏhab or affiliating oneself with a Maḏhab —this is a permissible matter according to what is well known among the scholars. Rather, what is blameworthy is fanaticism to Maḏhabs, and tying fiqh to Maḏhabs in such a way that one does not go beyond them and does not consider the evidence at all. Instead, issues are decided solely by the statements of the scholars of the Maḏhabs. 10. Following a Maḏhab, according to the scholars, if taken as a path to fiqh and not as fiqh itself, they do not condemn it. But if it is taken as the fiqh itself, and one restricts himself to it—indeed, even casting doubt upon what people know of rulings established upon evidence—then this is not permissible, and it is not the praiseworthy fiqh.

Yasar A Rahman

16,413 次观看 • 5 个月前

⚡️The leader of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Akhundzada, said in an Eid sermon in Kandahar: “If we are bombed, shelled with artillery, or targeted by airstrikes, we ask Allah that this does not shake our creed or our faith in Him. If you hold firmly to this religion and remain steadfast in Islam, then even if all the forces of the world unite against you, I assure you that no matter how much they try to harm you, topple your Islamic system, or undermine your dignity, they will never succeed.” “If aerial and artillery bombardment were capable of annihilating us, then major powers such as Russia and America would have succeeded in doing so before.” “We must uphold justice. Through it, systems endure, and their survival depends on it. As for injustice, it is the tool that destroys the foundations of the state and eliminates its stability.”

⚡️The leader of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Akhundzada, said in an Eid sermon in Kandahar: “If we are bombed, shelled with artillery, or targeted by airstrikes, we ask Allah that this does not shake our creed or our faith in Him. If you hold firmly to this religion and remain steadfast in Islam, then even if all the forces of the world unite against you, I assure you that no matter how much they try to harm you, topple your Islamic system, or undermine your dignity, they will never succeed.” “If aerial and artillery bombardment were capable of annihilating us, then major powers such as Russia and America would have succeeded in doing so before.” “We must uphold justice. Through it, systems endure, and their survival depends on it. As for injustice, it is the tool that destroys the foundations of the state and eliminates its stability.”

Warfare Analysis

75,842 次观看 • 3 个月前

“Jews are our enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing.” Egyptian cleric Muhammad Hussein Ya’qoub on Al-Rahma TV: “If the Jews left Palestine to us, would we start loving them? Of course not. We will never love them. Absolutely not. The Jews are infidels – not because I say so, and not because they are killing Muslims, but because Allah said: “The Jews say that Uzair is the son of Allah, and the Christians say that Christ is the son of Allah. These are the words from their mouths. They imitate the sayings of the disbelievers before. May Allah fight them. How deluded they are.” It is Allah who said that they are infidels. Your belief regarding the Jews should be, first, that they are infidels, and second, that they are enemies. They are enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing. Allah said: “You shall find the strongest men in enmity to the disbelievers [sic] to be the Jews and the polytheists.” Third, you must believe that the Jews will never stop fighting and killing us. They [fight] not for the sake of land and security, as they claim, but for the sake of their religion: “And they will not cease fighting you until they turn you back you’re your religion, if they can.” This is it. We must believe that our fighting with the Jews is eternal, and it will not end until the final battle – and this is the fourth point. You must believe that we will fight, defeat, and annihilate them, until not a single Jew remains on the face of the Earth. It is not me who says so. The Prophet said: “Judgment Day will not come until you fight the Jews and kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones and tree will call: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him – except for the Gharqad tree, which is the tree of the Jews.” I have heard that they are planting many of these trees now. As for you Jews – the curse of Allah upon you. The curse of Allah upon you, whose ancestors were apes and pigs. You Jews have sown hatred in our hearts, and we have bequeathed it to our children and grandchildren. You will not survive as long as a single one of us remains. Oh Jews, may the curse of Allah be upon you. Oh Jews... Oh Allah, bring Your wrath, punishment, and torment down upon them. Allah, we pray that you transform them again, and make the Muslims rejoice again in seeing them as apes and pigs. You pigs of the earth! You pigs of the earth! You kill the Muslims with that cold pig [blood] of yours.”

“Jews are our enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing.” Egyptian cleric Muhammad Hussein Ya’qoub on Al-Rahma TV: “If the Jews left Palestine to us, would we start loving them? Of course not. We will never love them. Absolutely not. The Jews are infidels – not because I say so, and not because they are killing Muslims, but because Allah said: “The Jews say that Uzair is the son of Allah, and the Christians say that Christ is the son of Allah. These are the words from their mouths. They imitate the sayings of the disbelievers before. May Allah fight them. How deluded they are.” It is Allah who said that they are infidels. Your belief regarding the Jews should be, first, that they are infidels, and second, that they are enemies. They are enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing. Allah said: “You shall find the strongest men in enmity to the disbelievers [sic] to be the Jews and the polytheists.” Third, you must believe that the Jews will never stop fighting and killing us. They [fight] not for the sake of land and security, as they claim, but for the sake of their religion: “And they will not cease fighting you until they turn you back you’re your religion, if they can.” This is it. We must believe that our fighting with the Jews is eternal, and it will not end until the final battle – and this is the fourth point. You must believe that we will fight, defeat, and annihilate them, until not a single Jew remains on the face of the Earth. It is not me who says so. The Prophet said: “Judgment Day will not come until you fight the Jews and kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones and tree will call: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him – except for the Gharqad tree, which is the tree of the Jews.” I have heard that they are planting many of these trees now. As for you Jews – the curse of Allah upon you. The curse of Allah upon you, whose ancestors were apes and pigs. You Jews have sown hatred in our hearts, and we have bequeathed it to our children and grandchildren. You will not survive as long as a single one of us remains. Oh Jews, may the curse of Allah be upon you. Oh Jews... Oh Allah, bring Your wrath, punishment, and torment down upon them. Allah, we pray that you transform them again, and make the Muslims rejoice again in seeing them as apes and pigs. You pigs of the earth! You pigs of the earth! You kill the Muslims with that cold pig [blood] of yours.”

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

207,520 次观看 • 1 年前

Dear World Wide Web, #KarenRead and #JohnOKeefe are more than just names, victims and content. Their worlds are STILL GOING THROUGH IT. KEYWORDS: THEIR WORLDS. Not yours. Their FAMILIES. Not YOURS. As with you and your own - FAMILY COMES FIRST - right? the rest of the world (the public - ALL OF US) can sit tf down and wait. Come second. Maybe even 10th. Point being, if you’re NOT A READ FAMILY MEMBER OR READ ATTORNEY, PART OF JOHN OKEEFE ESTATE OR JOHN O’KEEFES FAMILY - SIT BACK & SAY OUTLOUD - is this RESPECTFUL to THEM? STOP ASSUMING YOU KNOW HOW THEY FELT OR WHAT THEY SAID. Do FACTS matter to any of you? 🤨 You all claim to CARE about evidence, truth & are “fighting for justice” but are YOU?? REALLY? Or is it SELECTIVE? Are you down for transparency only when it doesn’t directly involve your immediate current events/surroundings/actions? 🤔 👀 IDK… 🤷‍♀️ just look in the mirror more often…. 🪞 MANY OF YOU KNOW - TRUTHFULLY KNOW- you’re straight up LYING. And the TRUTH ALWAYS COMES OUT. Just another waiting game. #IDAREYOU

Dear World Wide Web, #KarenRead and #JohnOKeefe are more than just names, victims and content. Their worlds are STILL GOING THROUGH IT. KEYWORDS: THEIR WORLDS. Not yours. Their FAMILIES. Not YOURS. As with you and your own - FAMILY COMES FIRST - right? the rest of the world (the public - ALL OF US) can sit tf down and wait. Come second. Maybe even 10th. Point being, if you’re NOT A READ FAMILY MEMBER OR READ ATTORNEY, PART OF JOHN OKEEFE ESTATE OR JOHN O’KEEFES FAMILY - SIT BACK & SAY OUTLOUD - is this RESPECTFUL to THEM? STOP ASSUMING YOU KNOW HOW THEY FELT OR WHAT THEY SAID. Do FACTS matter to any of you? 🤨 You all claim to CARE about evidence, truth & are “fighting for justice” but are YOU?? REALLY? Or is it SELECTIVE? Are you down for transparency only when it doesn’t directly involve your immediate current events/surroundings/actions? 🤔 👀 IDK… 🤷‍♀️ just look in the mirror more often…. 🪞 MANY OF YOU KNOW - TRUTHFULLY KNOW- you’re straight up LYING. And the TRUTH ALWAYS COMES OUT. Just another waiting game. #IDAREYOU

Boston Brandi

34,846 次观看 • 5 个月前

LIE: Salafis did not consider Bashar a disbeliever and prohibited khuruj against him. TL;DR: Salafi scholars declared Bashar and his father as disbelievers long ago and only emphasize that khuruj, like any other act of worship, be done in accordance with the shariʿah. Shaykh Falāh Al-Mundakār (رحمه الله): "Our scholars, even before Bashar, in the days of his filthy father would declare this (Syrian) government as disbelievers. This declaration means that it is permissible to go out against them. Bashar follows his father in regards to takfir and permitting khuruj... When a declaration of takfir takes place, it means khuruj is permissible, but I hope we can understand what this means. (Scholars say) A disbeliever may be gone out against (khuruj) but then say do not go out against him or protest, there is no contradiction. This is because khuruj is an issue within the shariʿah. You go out within the confines of the shariʿah — raising the statement of Allah above all and removing a disbelieving leader and replacing him with a Muslim one. There is nothing in the shariʿah whether compulsory or permissible except that it is linked to conditions. The first in in this issue (khuruj) is ability... As for not having ability, this is where they (the scholars) say do not go out against him due to incompetence, inability, and conditions not being met. When these conditions are fulfilled then bismillah (go ahead). Allah will aid and make you successful without a doubt. But if you certainly know you do not have the ability or even a tenth and the conditions are not met, do not throw the children of the Muslims or the general Muslims into these types of fitan..."

LIE: Salafis did not consider Bashar a disbeliever and prohibited khuruj against him. TL;DR: Salafi scholars declared Bashar and his father as disbelievers long ago and only emphasize that khuruj, like any other act of worship, be done in accordance with the shariʿah. Shaykh Falāh Al-Mundakār (رحمه الله): "Our scholars, even before Bashar, in the days of his filthy father would declare this (Syrian) government as disbelievers. This declaration means that it is permissible to go out against them. Bashar follows his father in regards to takfir and permitting khuruj... When a declaration of takfir takes place, it means khuruj is permissible, but I hope we can understand what this means. (Scholars say) A disbeliever may be gone out against (khuruj) but then say do not go out against him or protest, there is no contradiction. This is because khuruj is an issue within the shariʿah. You go out within the confines of the shariʿah — raising the statement of Allah above all and removing a disbelieving leader and replacing him with a Muslim one. There is nothing in the shariʿah whether compulsory or permissible except that it is linked to conditions. The first in in this issue (khuruj) is ability... As for not having ability, this is where they (the scholars) say do not go out against him due to incompetence, inability, and conditions not being met. When these conditions are fulfilled then bismillah (go ahead). Allah will aid and make you successful without a doubt. But if you certainly know you do not have the ability or even a tenth and the conditions are not met, do not throw the children of the Muslims or the general Muslims into these types of fitan..."

Abu Zaid

56,880 次观看 • 1 年前

"If you say or imply that people cannot be English or British because of the colour of their skin [...] if you say they should now be deported, then mark my words, we will fight you with everything we have, because you are an enemy of national renewal." -Keir Starmer Typically when a group of people openly talk about invasion and conquest of a country, come in and do it with the help of the government paid for by the hard-working citizens, refuse to assimilate, and then mass-rape the women and children while the politicians cover it up, I do fear that may be a recipe for disaster... but what do I know?

"If you say or imply that people cannot be English or British because of the colour of their skin [...] if you say they should now be deported, then mark my words, we will fight you with everything we have, because you are an enemy of national renewal." -Keir Starmer Typically when a group of people openly talk about invasion and conquest of a country, come in and do it with the help of the government paid for by the hard-working citizens, refuse to assimilate, and then mass-rape the women and children while the politicians cover it up, I do fear that may be a recipe for disaster... but what do I know?

Avery Daye

77,708 次观看 • 3 个月前

Trump: "They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda and if you look, the Congo, or you could say Serbia, Kosovo, you could say a lot of them. The big one is India and Pakistan. I should've gotten it four or five times."

Trump: "They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda and if you look, the Congo, or you could say Serbia, Kosovo, you could say a lot of them. The big one is India and Pakistan. I should've gotten it four or five times."

Aaron Rupar

1,270,249 次观看 • 1 年前

Lecture in Kabul about Shia vs Sunni (rough translation); This is a hot topic today, let us pray that Allah (swt) removes this enmity and animosity between us. The Muslim Ummah has been destroyed by this jealousy, grudge and enmity. It has destroyed our unity. It is the English who have turned us against each other, they have spread suspicion between sects and schools of thoughts. Let us remember that this war which America and Israel is waging is not against Shias, it is a war against Islam. America and Israel are thinking about destroying Islam. They are not thinking about “this is Shia and this is Sunni”. They did this in Iraq, pelting Shias and Sunnis against each other. They did the same in Syria. They were here in Afghanistan for 20 years, where was the talk about Shia? Were they talking and fighting Shias? No. The sole purpose of America and Israel is to make Muslims weak. Because for 1,200 years in this world, it was Muslims running empires. Muslims were powerful rulers under the banner of Islam. So America and Israel don’t want Muslims to stand on their feet again and become rulers of the world. If someone raises his head as a Muslim, they take care of them right there and then. There must be few thousand people in this majlis, forgive my language, they either take out the head, or take out the bottom (castrate then). They have castrated many countries, they have castrated the Arab countries, including Pakistan. I hope no one says that is a Muslim country with an atom bomb, no, Pakistan is castrated. The atom bomb is not under its own control, it is under the control of the English and Americans. They say we will either chop the head of a Muslim, or chop the bottom of a Muslim. One of them must be chopped. And this is what they have done. Have they done this or not? Tell the truth. All Arab countries have turned themselves like animals with four legs and have handed over the leash to America. Have they done this or not? Its leash is in the hand of America. They can’t even raise their voice a little, to show that they are independent, and to show that their heads are on top of their own neck, they cannot say anything. Does slavery have a tail and horn? Is this true or not, tell the truth? Allah (swt) says; “And prepare against them whatever you are able of power” In that era, it was swords, horses, armors, helmets, this was in the era of the prophet (pbuh). Now, those things will not work. Today, even a gun is not sufficient, now it is missiles, drones, atom bombs, press a switch and it goes to its destination. This is an order from Allah that Muslims should prepare against the enemy, and deter the enemy. Don’t start problems between each other over sects, otherwise you will be finished. Allah has said to us in the Quran; “and do not dispute and [thus] lose courage and [then] your strength would depart” You will be destroyed, your strength will be gone. This strength will be wasted and lost against each other. Is this true or not? These bullets, these weapons and martyrs from this side, and in that side, Pakistan fights Afghanistan under the command of America, right? They are Muslim, at least they are Muslim by name, it is a Muslim country, so wouldn’t it have been better if this strength, if those bullets and weapons were used against Israel and the enemies of Muslims? But our strength is being used against each other. How unfortunate is this? Whose plots are these? The plots of the English. They say muddy the water, and catch the fish…

Lecture in Kabul about Shia vs Sunni (rough translation); This is a hot topic today, let us pray that Allah (swt) removes this enmity and animosity between us. The Muslim Ummah has been destroyed by this jealousy, grudge and enmity. It has destroyed our unity. It is the English who have turned us against each other, they have spread suspicion between sects and schools of thoughts. Let us remember that this war which America and Israel is waging is not against Shias, it is a war against Islam. America and Israel are thinking about destroying Islam. They are not thinking about “this is Shia and this is Sunni”. They did this in Iraq, pelting Shias and Sunnis against each other. They did the same in Syria. They were here in Afghanistan for 20 years, where was the talk about Shia? Were they talking and fighting Shias? No. The sole purpose of America and Israel is to make Muslims weak. Because for 1,200 years in this world, it was Muslims running empires. Muslims were powerful rulers under the banner of Islam. So America and Israel don’t want Muslims to stand on their feet again and become rulers of the world. If someone raises his head as a Muslim, they take care of them right there and then. There must be few thousand people in this majlis, forgive my language, they either take out the head, or take out the bottom (castrate then). They have castrated many countries, they have castrated the Arab countries, including Pakistan. I hope no one says that is a Muslim country with an atom bomb, no, Pakistan is castrated. The atom bomb is not under its own control, it is under the control of the English and Americans. They say we will either chop the head of a Muslim, or chop the bottom of a Muslim. One of them must be chopped. And this is what they have done. Have they done this or not? Tell the truth. All Arab countries have turned themselves like animals with four legs and have handed over the leash to America. Have they done this or not? Its leash is in the hand of America. They can’t even raise their voice a little, to show that they are independent, and to show that their heads are on top of their own neck, they cannot say anything. Does slavery have a tail and horn? Is this true or not, tell the truth? Allah (swt) says; “And prepare against them whatever you are able of power” In that era, it was swords, horses, armors, helmets, this was in the era of the prophet (pbuh). Now, those things will not work. Today, even a gun is not sufficient, now it is missiles, drones, atom bombs, press a switch and it goes to its destination. This is an order from Allah that Muslims should prepare against the enemy, and deter the enemy. Don’t start problems between each other over sects, otherwise you will be finished. Allah has said to us in the Quran; “and do not dispute and [thus] lose courage and [then] your strength would depart” You will be destroyed, your strength will be gone. This strength will be wasted and lost against each other. Is this true or not? These bullets, these weapons and martyrs from this side, and in that side, Pakistan fights Afghanistan under the command of America, right? They are Muslim, at least they are Muslim by name, it is a Muslim country, so wouldn’t it have been better if this strength, if those bullets and weapons were used against Israel and the enemies of Muslims? But our strength is being used against each other. How unfortunate is this? Whose plots are these? The plots of the English. They say muddy the water, and catch the fish…

The Sure Path

41,599 次观看 • 3 个月前

Telling the Truth in a Post-Truth World — John MacArthur There is a kind of insanity that says, “I can do anything I want. I can live any way I want.” And because the consequences are not instantaneous and immediate, although they well could be, because the wages of sin is—what?—death, because God is a God of mercy and God allows sinners to survive and even enjoy common grace, they somehow come to believe that they can continually store up wrath against the day of God’s judgment—as Romans 2 says—and there will be no consequences. Everyone understands and everyone lives—let’s put it this way—under the all-encompassing, all-sovereign authority of natural law. It is sovereign, it is without mercy, and it will bring consequences, mostly immediate, to its violators.But because people think they can get away with sin and evil behavior and immorality, and they can live with lies and deception, our society is drowning in that. This has become, frankly, for us a comfortable norm. In fact, it’s so normal to violate the moral and spiritual laws of God that our nation is making laws to protect those violations. Moral and spiritual law is violated, starting with children who are being told at the ages of four and five that they may not be a girl when they are a girl, they may not be a boy when they are a boy, and they need to have some transgender treatment, all the way to the unbelievable advocacy of abortion from an entire party in the United States. The real terrorists in America didn’t hit 9/11; the real terrorists in America are people who advocate abortion—they massacre the creation of God continually. The whole society, I think, has sort of arrived at the cynicism of Pilate, who say, “What is truth?” cynically, and then walked away before he had an answer. The Russian grand chess master by the name of Kasparov made an interesting statement. He said this: “The point of modern propaganda is not only to misinform or push an agenda, it is to exhaust your critical thinking so as to annihilate truth.” This culture is making critical thinking an exhausting battle. They just continually hit us with a barrage of lies and deception with the notion that they can wear out our will to fight; and it works. It works in the culture for the unregenerate, who are falling into that kind of insanity. It even works in the church as supposed church leaders and pastors cave in to the demands of certain sins in the culture. This post-truth ideology really, really flourishes—and this is an important thing to note—when it is empowered by a group identity. If you have one sort of loose cannon running around like Chicken Little, “The sky is falling, the sky is falling, the sky is falling,” you sort of laugh at Chicken Little. But if Chicken Little has a group identity, if he’s empowered by a whole lot of other people who are saying the same thing and there’s a collection of liars committed to this, they’re empowered. So you have the LGBTQ community, you have the trans community, you have cults, you have false religions, you have aberrations of all kinds. And the individuals involved in those things are not alone; they are basically empowered because they have teammates. And at that point, they become ensnared in the immoral, deceptive lies, and the web captures them. They are being mutually affirmed by their other teammates, and then they are being even more mutually affirmed as the culture affirms them and the nation makes laws to make sin righteousness, and to make righteousness a violation of law. You come along or I come along and confront that, and we find it’s impossible to convince them of the dire deception they are in and its terrifying consequences because we’re on the outside. And what do they say to us? “You haven’t lived my life. You haven’t walked in my step. Who are you to tell me what to do.” These groups, as they get stronger and stronger and larger and larger, insulate each other in their lies.

Telling the Truth in a Post-Truth World — John MacArthur There is a kind of insanity that says, “I can do anything I want. I can live any way I want.” And because the consequences are not instantaneous and immediate, although they well could be, because the wages of sin is—what?—death, because God is a God of mercy and God allows sinners to survive and even enjoy common grace, they somehow come to believe that they can continually store up wrath against the day of God’s judgment—as Romans 2 says—and there will be no consequences. Everyone understands and everyone lives—let’s put it this way—under the all-encompassing, all-sovereign authority of natural law. It is sovereign, it is without mercy, and it will bring consequences, mostly immediate, to its violators.But because people think they can get away with sin and evil behavior and immorality, and they can live with lies and deception, our society is drowning in that. This has become, frankly, for us a comfortable norm. In fact, it’s so normal to violate the moral and spiritual laws of God that our nation is making laws to protect those violations. Moral and spiritual law is violated, starting with children who are being told at the ages of four and five that they may not be a girl when they are a girl, they may not be a boy when they are a boy, and they need to have some transgender treatment, all the way to the unbelievable advocacy of abortion from an entire party in the United States. The real terrorists in America didn’t hit 9/11; the real terrorists in America are people who advocate abortion—they massacre the creation of God continually. The whole society, I think, has sort of arrived at the cynicism of Pilate, who say, “What is truth?” cynically, and then walked away before he had an answer. The Russian grand chess master by the name of Kasparov made an interesting statement. He said this: “The point of modern propaganda is not only to misinform or push an agenda, it is to exhaust your critical thinking so as to annihilate truth.” This culture is making critical thinking an exhausting battle. They just continually hit us with a barrage of lies and deception with the notion that they can wear out our will to fight; and it works. It works in the culture for the unregenerate, who are falling into that kind of insanity. It even works in the church as supposed church leaders and pastors cave in to the demands of certain sins in the culture. This post-truth ideology really, really flourishes—and this is an important thing to note—when it is empowered by a group identity. If you have one sort of loose cannon running around like Chicken Little, “The sky is falling, the sky is falling, the sky is falling,” you sort of laugh at Chicken Little. But if Chicken Little has a group identity, if he’s empowered by a whole lot of other people who are saying the same thing and there’s a collection of liars committed to this, they’re empowered. So you have the LGBTQ community, you have the trans community, you have cults, you have false religions, you have aberrations of all kinds. And the individuals involved in those things are not alone; they are basically empowered because they have teammates. And at that point, they become ensnared in the immoral, deceptive lies, and the web captures them. They are being mutually affirmed by their other teammates, and then they are being even more mutually affirmed as the culture affirms them and the nation makes laws to make sin righteousness, and to make righteousness a violation of law. You come along or I come along and confront that, and we find it’s impossible to convince them of the dire deception they are in and its terrifying consequences because we’re on the outside. And what do they say to us? “You haven’t lived my life. You haven’t walked in my step. Who are you to tell me what to do.” These groups, as they get stronger and stronger and larger and larger, insulate each other in their lies.

Terri Green

19,210 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 NOW: It's been exposed JUST how screwed John Bolton is after being indicted under the Espionage Act, with a total of 18 counts Bolton might ALSO be a target because he could know of other deep state criminal activity...👀 "They are very difficult cases to defend against because it is in essence a simple analysis! Is the document classified? It in your possession? Did you purposefully possess the document in question?" "And then you reach other analyses. You look at what was the purpose for the for the possession to determine whether or not additional charges may be brought." "Bolton has a lot of knowledge and lot of insight. There's maybe an effort to also get his attention and get him talking about other things that he may have information about." "This is just the beginning, the tip of the iceberg. I think it's a difficult case to defend against. He, of all people, should know. Doesn't matter if it's old or new materials. If it's classified and you possessed it, then it could be a crime." HE'S DONE!

🚨 NOW: It's been exposed JUST how screwed John Bolton is after being indicted under the Espionage Act, with a total of 18 counts Bolton might ALSO be a target because he could know of other deep state criminal activity...👀 "They are very difficult cases to defend against because it is in essence a simple analysis! Is the document classified? It in your possession? Did you purposefully possess the document in question?" "And then you reach other analyses. You look at what was the purpose for the for the possession to determine whether or not additional charges may be brought." "Bolton has a lot of knowledge and lot of insight. There's maybe an effort to also get his attention and get him talking about other things that he may have information about." "This is just the beginning, the tip of the iceberg. I think it's a difficult case to defend against. He, of all people, should know. Doesn't matter if it's old or new materials. If it's classified and you possessed it, then it could be a crime." HE'S DONE!

Eric Daugherty

128,999 次观看 • 8 个月前

Q: Why is company culture important? In the clip below, a16z cofounder Ben Horowitz argues that culture drives how people in your company behave on a daily basis—and particularly, how they behave when you’re not looking. Is that phone call so important I need to return it today or can it wait until tomorrow? Can I ask for a raise before my annual review? Is the quality of this document good enough or should I keep working on it? Do I have to be on time for that meeting? Should I stay at the Four Seasons or the Red Roof Inn? Should I go home at 5 p.m. or 8 p.m.? Should we discuss the color of this new product for five minutes or thirty hours? If I know something is badly broken in the company, should I say something? Whom should I tell? Is winning more important than ethics? None of these things are in your mission statement or OKRs, but they determine many important things for your company, such as how people experience your company, what you’re like to do business with, what your company is like to work at, etc. And as Ben describes, what drives the culture is all of the little behaviors and cues people take on: “this is what I have to do to succeed in this company.” Culture can feel abstract and secondary when you pit it against a concrete result that’s right in front of you, but it’s a strategic investment in the company doing things the right way when you are not looking. It’s the set of assumptions your employees use to resolve the problems they face every day. It’s how they behave when no one is looking. If you don’t methodically set your culture, then two-thirds of it will end up being accidental, and the rest will be a mistake. If you’re looking for a more in-depth guide to culture and how to build a great one, I’d recommend Ben’s book: What You Do Is Who You Are.

Q: Why is company culture important? In the clip below, a16z cofounder Ben Horowitz argues that culture drives how people in your company behave on a daily basis—and particularly, how they behave when you’re not looking. Is that phone call so important I need to return it today or can it wait until tomorrow? Can I ask for a raise before my annual review? Is the quality of this document good enough or should I keep working on it? Do I have to be on time for that meeting? Should I stay at the Four Seasons or the Red Roof Inn? Should I go home at 5 p.m. or 8 p.m.? Should we discuss the color of this new product for five minutes or thirty hours? If I know something is badly broken in the company, should I say something? Whom should I tell? Is winning more important than ethics? None of these things are in your mission statement or OKRs, but they determine many important things for your company, such as how people experience your company, what you’re like to do business with, what your company is like to work at, etc. And as Ben describes, what drives the culture is all of the little behaviors and cues people take on: “this is what I have to do to succeed in this company.” Culture can feel abstract and secondary when you pit it against a concrete result that’s right in front of you, but it’s a strategic investment in the company doing things the right way when you are not looking. It’s the set of assumptions your employees use to resolve the problems they face every day. It’s how they behave when no one is looking. If you don’t methodically set your culture, then two-thirds of it will end up being accidental, and the rest will be a mistake. If you’re looking for a more in-depth guide to culture and how to build a great one, I’d recommend Ben’s book: What You Do Is Who You Are.

Michael McGuiness

180,634 次观看 • 2 年前

Telling the truth is worth it, even if it comes at a price. "You look around and you see these people and some of them really have paid a heavy price for telling the truth, & they are cast out of their groups, whatever those groups are, but they do it anyway." - Tucker Carlson

Telling the truth is worth it, even if it comes at a price. "You look around and you see these people and some of them really have paid a heavy price for telling the truth, & they are cast out of their groups, whatever those groups are, but they do it anyway." - Tucker Carlson

Heritage Foundation

90,321 次观看 • 3 年前

Yvonne Watson recently was recognised in a UK court as a "Living Woman". Is this the first time this has happened? This is Yvonne Watson's Prayer (the dog snoring is God's sense of humour): Great Creator, source of truth and life. I stand before You today as I truly am. Not a name, not a number, not a fiction- But a living woman, born of the Earth and Spirit. My breath is Yours. My soul is Sovereign. My rights are unalienable. Wrap me in your peace as I walk into this place of judgment. Let no fear into me, for I do not stand alone. You are with me. Truth is with me. And the ancestors who walked in truth walk beside me now. Let the words I speak be clear and powerful. Let my presence remind even the judge that justice must answer to truth. Let the eyes that see me know I come in peace. But will not surrender my essence to false or fiction. If there is deception, may it dissolve. If there is injustice, may it be exposed. If there is doubt, may Your light pierce it. I do not seek war. I bring no hate. But I claim what is mine - my voice, my body, my soul. My right to live unbound, unowned, unbroken. Let the court be a place where truth is heard today, Or let my presence alone serve as the living notice. That the old world of silence and submission is ending. So be it. I walk in light. I walk in love. I walk in the power of who I AM. And so it is.

Yvonne Watson recently was recognised in a UK court as a "Living Woman". Is this the first time this has happened? This is Yvonne Watson's Prayer (the dog snoring is God's sense of humour): Great Creator, source of truth and life. I stand before You today as I truly am. Not a name, not a number, not a fiction- But a living woman, born of the Earth and Spirit. My breath is Yours. My soul is Sovereign. My rights are unalienable. Wrap me in your peace as I walk into this place of judgment. Let no fear into me, for I do not stand alone. You are with me. Truth is with me. And the ancestors who walked in truth walk beside me now. Let the words I speak be clear and powerful. Let my presence remind even the judge that justice must answer to truth. Let the eyes that see me know I come in peace. But will not surrender my essence to false or fiction. If there is deception, may it dissolve. If there is injustice, may it be exposed. If there is doubt, may Your light pierce it. I do not seek war. I bring no hate. But I claim what is mine - my voice, my body, my soul. My right to live unbound, unowned, unbroken. Let the court be a place where truth is heard today, Or let my presence alone serve as the living notice. That the old world of silence and submission is ending. So be it. I walk in light. I walk in love. I walk in the power of who I AM. And so it is.

Mark Attwood

15,993 次观看 • 10 个月前

Obama: America has always had competing stories about who we are and what the nation stands for. The first story says that even though we got rid of a king, there is still a caste system in America, a pecking order of who makes decisions That if somebody doesn't look like or think like you or practice religion the same way you do, they must be a threat to your way of life, and they need to be put in their place. That is how Donald Trump thinks about America. Make America great again by putting the people in charge even if they don't know what the hell they are doing. But here is the thing. That story is not new. It is the oldest story in the book. It is not even uniquely American. For most of human history, that is the way society has worked. For somebody on top and somebody on bottom. There were lords and peasants. For a long time, that story of caste and privilege and concentrated power was the law of the land here in America. If you look like me, you were likely treated as property. If you were a woman, or a white man who did not own property, you could not vote. But from the very start, there was another story, born of this nation's true revolutionary spirit, a story that says, we the people means what it says, that all of us are included, that we are not subjects, but citizens, defined not by race or religion or gender or sexual orientation, but by our commitment to a common creed and a willingness to accept not just privileges, but responsibilities that come with that citizenship.

Obama: America has always had competing stories about who we are and what the nation stands for. The first story says that even though we got rid of a king, there is still a caste system in America, a pecking order of who makes decisions That if somebody doesn't look like or think like you or practice religion the same way you do, they must be a threat to your way of life, and they need to be put in their place. That is how Donald Trump thinks about America. Make America great again by putting the people in charge even if they don't know what the hell they are doing. But here is the thing. That story is not new. It is the oldest story in the book. It is not even uniquely American. For most of human history, that is the way society has worked. For somebody on top and somebody on bottom. There were lords and peasants. For a long time, that story of caste and privilege and concentrated power was the law of the land here in America. If you look like me, you were likely treated as property. If you were a woman, or a white man who did not own property, you could not vote. But from the very start, there was another story, born of this nation's true revolutionary spirit, a story that says, we the people means what it says, that all of us are included, that we are not subjects, but citizens, defined not by race or religion or gender or sexual orientation, but by our commitment to a common creed and a willingness to accept not just privileges, but responsibilities that come with that citizenship.

Acyn

188,611 次观看 • 7 个月前

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

The Peel

209,752 次观看 • 1 年前