Was it really that easy?

This method is completely wrong. If you change the order of the numbers, you will get the same result. For example, if you change 125 to 251, using the same cube root, the result will still be 5, which is incorrect.

Obviously square root of 196 and 169 both are same

Cool. What’s the square root of 14?

wtf people out here posting fake math!!! We’re all f@cked!!

This actually works, I used this method for my SAT’s and I got accepted into college 🙏

Tansu, try these instead: ³√20 ≈ 2.714 √50 ≈ 7.071 √72 ≈ 8.485 No clean integers. No magic. Just math. Funny how the “magic pattern” disappears when the numbers aren’t cherry-picked. 😂

Our Math teacher be like :)

No, doesnt work

@grok under what conditions does (X)^(1/n), for some positive Integer X , = the sum of the digits of X - n ?

No this doesn’t always work, it’s a coincidence that these work out this way.

Not sure if it's accurate

9x9=81 Sq. Root of 81 8+1-2=7 wrong

OP right now

Setting up the trick is always the hard part

14

do it with 144

Sure, now find the cubed root of 200 using this method.

of course, sqrt(16) = 5 XD

what’s the root of 144?

sqrt(81)= (8+1)-2= 7 ???🤣🤣 not a mathematics... its Coincidence

cherrypicked

@grok is this correct in all cases?

²√169=13 But when we solve that with this method we get the wrong answer Because ²√169=13 (1+6+9)-2=13 (7+9)-2=13 16-2=13 14=13 14 is not equal to 13

They have just cherrypicked some examples where this works Think that the square of 14 (196) and 13 (169) contain the same digits By the logic of this post The square root of both 196 and 169 should be 14 Clearly it isn’t 🤷‍♂️

this is wrong. take 36 as an example.

Try 81

Completely incorrect and illogical method and flaunting it by taking a few carefully curated examples… By this logic: 169 & 196 will have the same square root and 81 will have a square root of 8…

These work for some particular numbers.

No, no it wasnt. You silly goose. Silly goose police called, you need to turn yourself in.

Hey guys, let me tell you that in 1~999, this stupid method can only work with the square root of 4,25,64,196,289 and the cube root of 125,216,343.(Only consider about the square root and cube root of the integers included by (0,1000))

Yes, sometimes things just fall into place effortlessly. It's all about timing and being in the right mindset. Trust the process and believe in yourself. Keep pushing forward and you'll see that success can come easier than you think. Keep up the great work!

4*49 14

Square root 16