Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Washington is trying to extend its terrestrial hegemony into orbit. Beijing’s answer is simple: Space is not America’s private hunting ground. You do not get to lose your monopoly on Earth and then declare the heavens another battlefield simply because military dominance is the only language you still trust....

27,775 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

18 Yorum

Charley profil fotoğrafı
Charley1 gün önce

Unfortunately, it’s the same old story. The United Stages wages War and China wages Peace.

Jonathan Jones profil fotoğrafı
Jonathan Jones1 gün önce

china should not be naive, saying these things will not change people on the hill in the US’s opinions. Only way china should handle this is build their own weapons for spce, if they have not done so already

Kylie profil fotoğrafı
Kylie1 gün önce

What happened with America it can not just live in peace like everyone it will find anything just to start fight 🤔 outer space again this is not okay

bigedko profil fotoğrafı
bigedko1 gün önce

What a speech.. Namaste

Stefan profil fotoğrafı
Stefan1 gün önce

杀光支那人为人类除害

XF6F-6 profil fotoğrafı
XF6F-61 gün önce

Last week China lost a satillite. Now Trump announce space weapons.

tsu khan profil fotoğrafı
tsu khan1 gün önce

When China says in diplomatic language that space is not the private property of the United States, it means that China also has weapons in space, and this is no secret."

Multipolarity 🗺 or ðeatĥ profil fotoğrafı
Multipolarity 🗺 or ðeatĥ1 gün önce

🇺🇸 not capable to achieve it's aspirations in that respect, so it's a mute issue. Their excellent at building moon landing props over in Hollywood, that's the extent of what they can do even with Musk and Bezos.

Harry McDowell profil fotoğrafı
Harry McDowell1 gün önce

What are they mad about? Cause we have reusable rockets that can launch a new satellite in 12 hours?

Stefan0x profil fotoğrafı
Stefan0x1 gün önce

Rules for thee not for me.

BLT No lettuce profil fotoğrafı
BLT No lettuce1 gün önce

Yes, says some chick named “Corrine” from Southeast Asia. Seems legit.

P W Deutschland profil fotoğrafı
P W Deutschland1 gün önce

Trump has three goals: To distance himself from the Epstein scandal, To enrich himself further, and To harm the Chinese because the United States can no longer rob them as it used to.

Kuttitronic profil fotoğrafı
Kuttitronic1 gün önce

Wonderful comment.

KnezRomeo, Former professor profil fotoğrafı
KnezRomeo, Former professor1 gün önce

oh Corrine 💐💐💐

Lynx Syndicates - Bespoke Social Housing profil fotoğrafı
Lynx Syndicates - Bespoke Social Housing1 gün önce

Unlike the British lackey, #China is already living 100+ years ahead of everyone else. The message is very clear to #ClownWorld - DON'T FUCK WITH #CHINA!!!

Space Cadet profil fotoğrafı
Space Cadet1 gün önce

Sanity check.

Ma Liberté profil fotoğrafı
Ma Liberté1 gün önce

👏

Guru Bukele Nakamoto profil fotoğrafı
Guru Bukele Nakamoto1 gün önce

I guess the attitude here is. It is yours if you can defend it and fight for it. So there you go! Those are the rules. Rules of the Jungle!

Benzer Videolar

China slaps down Palau’s malicious attempt to hijack South Pacific island nations and manufacture a regional security crisis out of China’s normal missile tests. China tested a missile into the high seas. China is not a subscriber to the Hague Code of Conduct and is therefore not bound by its notification mechanism. Yet China still issued navigation and airspace warnings and notified relevant states in advance. Meanwhile, the United States has conducted more than 300 ICBM tests and roughly 200 SLBM tests. Washington has given China advance notice only once — in November 2024, after China had first notified the US of its own September launch. And now Palau is behaving as though China owes it a permission slip to conduct a lawful military test in the Pacific. This is the most ironic part: Palau has fewer than 20,000 people and its government has convinced itself that the Pacific is its private backyard. The high seas are not Palauan territorial waters. You do not get to turn an entire ocean into your private security perimeter and then demand that another Pacific power ask your permission to operate in international waters. Palau has sovereignty over Palau. It does not have sovereignty over the Pacific. If China conducts a lawful test in the high seas, your displeasure does not magically create jurisdiction. China is a Pacific country too. The Pacific is not Palau’s private swimming pool, and it certainly is not an American-administered firing range where only Washington gets to normalize missile testing. If every Chinese test is going to trigger a regional morality play, then perhaps China simply has not tested often enough for everyone to get used to the fact that it is a Pacific military power. America tested hundreds of times and made it background noise. China conducts a rare public test and everyone suddenly discovers trauma. Maybe the problem is not the missile. Maybe the problem is that the monopoly is over.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

59,279 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

SpaceX is about to shatter the largest IPO record in history. Not by a little. By more than double. The previous record was $29 billion. SpaceX is targeting $75 billion. Two months ago the number was $50 billion. Last week it was $70 billion. Now $75 billion. The filing has not even happened yet. Every time the market recalculates what SpaceX actually is, the answer gets bigger. Goldman Sachs. JPMorgan. Bank of America. Morgan Stanley. All lined up as underwriters. Target date: mid-June 2026. Target valuation: $1.75 trillion. That would make SpaceX larger than Meta. Larger than Tesla. Larger than every company on Earth except five. This is not some startup bleeding cash and calling it strategy. SpaceX made $8 billion in profit last year on $16 billion in revenue. They do not need the money. They are raising it because what comes next costs more than profit can fund at the speed they intend to move. Musk: “There just is no way to do a terawatt per year on Earth.” He ran the math on stage with Jensen Huang. Three hundred gigawatts of AI compute per year would consume two-thirds of all US electricity production. Not total energy. Just electricity. And three hundred gigawatts is not even the target. A terawatt is. More than three times that. Building enough power plants is not difficult. It is not expensive. It is physically impossible. Musk: “You have to do that in space.” Not should. Not could. Have to. Earth does not have the power. Cannot build it fast enough. Cannot cool the hardware. Not within a decade. Not at all. The bottleneck is not silicon. Not software. Not data. It is the planet itself. Musk: “You don’t actually need batteries because it’s always sunny in space. And the solar panels become cheaper because you don’t need glass or framing. And the cooling is just radiative.” No batteries. No night cycle. No weather. Just uninterrupted solar hitting bare panels in a vacuum. Heat dissipates on its own. Huang: “Each one of these GB300 racks is two tons. 1.95 of it is probably for cooling.” Ninety-seven percent of the weight of a supercomputer rack exists to keep it from overheating. Move it to space and that weight vanishes. The machine shrinks to something small enough to launch by the thousands. Running on free energy. Cooled by nothing. Musk: “I think even perhaps in the four or five year time frame, the lowest cost way to do AI compute will be with solar-powered AI satellites.” Not fifty years. Not twenty. Five. The cheapest AI compute on Earth will not be on Earth. It will be in orbit. And only one company can put it there at the cost and cadence required. That is what the market is pricing. Not a rocket company. The only organization on Earth capable of moving intelligence infrastructure off of it. Huang heard the pitch. The math. The timeline. Huang: “That’s the dream.” Musk: “Yes.” A trillion watts of compute. Powered by the Sun. Cooled by space. Launched by SpaceX. Every company building AI on the ground is building under the same ceiling. The atmosphere.

Dustin

44,710 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Mearsheimer is honest about power. He dares to say the quiet part of Western politics out loud: international relations are not a fairy tale of “good guys” and “bad guys”, but a naked struggle for survival, security, and dominance. That is why, to him, there is no moral distinction between America and China. But he still misunderstands China. His offensive realism has one fixed Western code: • A great power must seek regional hegemony. • A great power must push others into dependence. • A great power must turn its neighborhood into a Monroe Doctrine. So when he sees China rise, he assumes China must want to become America in Asia. That is where he gets China wrong. America’s strategy is exclusion. It cannot tolerate another strong power in its own hemisphere. That is why Cuba, Venezuela, and any independent force in Latin America become permanent targets. China’s strategy is not a Chinese Monroe Doctrine. China’s priority is stability around itself, because China’s own development requires peace, trade, logistics, markets, energy routes, and regional order. But stability does not mean turning neighbors into colonies. It does not mean hundreds of military bases. It does not mean color revolutions, proxy wars, sanctions, coups, and permanent ideological containment. China spent forty years building roads, ports, factories, power grids, railways, supply chains, and markets. America exported war. China exported infrastructure. America’s model is control. China’s model is connectivity. That is why Western realists often misread China. They assume interest maximization must mean domination. They assume security must mean exclusion. They assume strength must become hegemony. But China’s civilizational instinct is different. China does not need every country to become Chinese. It does not need every neighbor to become a satellite. It does not need to export ideology, stage revolutions, or install puppet regimes. China’s highest security is not ruling everyone around it. It is building a region where trade, development, and interdependence make war too expensive and chaos too stupid. Mearsheimer is right that great powers compete. But he is wrong to assume every great power dreams in American grammar. China does not want to become America in Asia. China wants Asia to stop being America’s battlefield.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

14,030 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce