正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

WATCH: David Sacks: "It's just fundamentally wrong to try and pretend that we are bereft of laws, bereft of safeguards..." "The reality is we have layers of protections here. We have layers of policing. And the Trump Administration has been extremely willing, starting with President Trump saying, listen, we’re... show more

Innovation Council

5,769 subscribers

26,703 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 条评论

AI STANDARDS INC | CVO 的头像

AI STANDARDS INC | CVO4 天前

David, seriously, if you want to win at AI, you must have a standards body that is independent like any other industry of consequence does. We can win. AI can thrive. The "trust Us" narrative disappears. Reach out to Joe, visit our website, call my cell...DM for the #. @aistandardsceo

Praveen Jatta 的头像

Praveen Jatta4 天前

@DavidSacks Worth scrutinizing. Biden's EO 14110 mandated federal AI safety reporting. Trump revoked it. What specific federal AI protections remain beyond general consumer laws? Industry needs clarity on actual rules — not reassurances. #AIPolicy #AIGovernance

Sons of Liberty 的头像

Sons of Liberty4 天前

@DavidSacks You sound like the Anti-Innovation Council

Martha Johnson 的头像

Martha Johnson4 天前

@DavidSacks Excellent points!

Tuanh Gagag 的头像

Tuanh Gagag4 天前

@DavidSacks Exactly! US already has laws, safeguards, and enforcement tools. The focus should be on responsible AI development while keeping American innovation moving forward not letting fear hand China the advantage.

Sleeping on a Foot 的头像

Sleeping on a Foot4 天前

@DavidSacks “Take off the guard rails so I can make even more $$ for myself.” I guess they can’t invest in the Chinese companies.

NJ Mom 的头像

NJ Mom4 天前

@DavidSacks We had plenty of protections against the government using agencies to come after political opponents. After what we have witnessed forgive us if we are skeptical.

AI STANDARDS INC | CVO 的头像

AI STANDARDS INC | CVO4 天前

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks

相关视频

Kevin Hassett LAUGHS in Margaret Brennan’s face after she repeats Iranian regime claims about harming the U.S. economy from oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say.” BRENNAN: “You just heard Iran’s foreign minister saying Tehran has been approached by other countries about negotiating their way through the strait.” “If that kind of negotiation happens are Americans just going to get cut out here?” HASSETT: “Well, first of all, you have to understand that America is not going to have its economy harmed by what the Iranians are doing.” [Laughs] “The bottom line is that in the ‘70s we didn’t produce much oil, but now we do.” “And so America is in a very strong position. They think that they’re going to harm the U.S. economy and get President Trump to back down.” “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say because the bottom line is that our economy has got all this momentum in the world and we have lots and lots of oil.”

Kevin Hassett LAUGHS in Margaret Brennan’s face after she repeats Iranian regime claims about harming the U.S. economy from oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say.” BRENNAN: “You just heard Iran’s foreign minister saying Tehran has been approached by other countries about negotiating their way through the strait.” “If that kind of negotiation happens are Americans just going to get cut out here?” HASSETT: “Well, first of all, you have to understand that America is not going to have its economy harmed by what the Iranians are doing.” [Laughs] “The bottom line is that in the ‘70s we didn’t produce much oil, but now we do.” “And so America is in a very strong position. They think that they’re going to harm the U.S. economy and get President Trump to back down.” “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say because the bottom line is that our economy has got all this momentum in the world and we have lots and lots of oil.”

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

351,922 次观看 • 6 个月前

Do you agree with Republican Liz Cheney that we are "sleepwalking into a dictatorship? Cheney says of Trump: "He's told us what he will do. It's very easy to see the steps that he will take. … People who say, 'Well, if he's elected, it's not that dangerous because we have all of these checks and balances,' don't fully understand the extent to which the Republicans in Congress today have been co-opted. … One of the things that we see happening today is a sort of a sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States." "If you look at what Donald Trump is trying to do, he can't do it by himself. He has to have collaborators. And the story of Mike Johnson is a story of, of a collaborator and of someone who knew then – and knows now – that what he's doing and saying is wrong, but he's willing to do it in an effort to please Donald Trump. And that's what makes it dangerous."

Do you agree with Republican Liz Cheney that we are "sleepwalking into a dictatorship? Cheney says of Trump: "He's told us what he will do. It's very easy to see the steps that he will take. … People who say, 'Well, if he's elected, it's not that dangerous because we have all of these checks and balances,' don't fully understand the extent to which the Republicans in Congress today have been co-opted. … One of the things that we see happening today is a sort of a sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States." "If you look at what Donald Trump is trying to do, he can't do it by himself. He has to have collaborators. And the story of Mike Johnson is a story of, of a collaborator and of someone who knew then – and knows now – that what he's doing and saying is wrong, but he's willing to do it in an effort to please Donald Trump. And that's what makes it dangerous."

Brian Krassenstein

1,140,149 次观看 • 2 年前

Kevin Hassett LAUGHS in Margaret Brennan’s face after she repeats Iranian regime claims about harming the U.S. economy from oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say.” BRENNAN: “You just heard Iran’s foreign minister saying Tehran has been approached by other countries about negotiating their way through the strait.” “If that kind of negotiation happens are Americans just going to get cut out here?” HASSETT: “Well, first of all, you have to understand that America is not going to have its economy harmed by what the Iranians are doing.” [Laughs] “The bottom line is that in the ‘70s we didn’t produce much oil, but now we do.” “And so America is in a very strong position. They think that they’re going to harm the U.S. economy and get President Trump to back down.” “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say because the bottom line is that our economy has got all this momentum in the world and we have lots and lots of oil.” “We have lots of trading partners that are more on the hook for imported oil from these guys.” “And as we can see, it’s completely unacceptable that a government that would, you know, murder 40,000 of their people just a few months ago would be blackmailing countries to let stuff through.” “President Trump thinks that is unacceptable.”

Kevin Hassett LAUGHS in Margaret Brennan’s face after she repeats Iranian regime claims about harming the U.S. economy from oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say.” BRENNAN: “You just heard Iran’s foreign minister saying Tehran has been approached by other countries about negotiating their way through the strait.” “If that kind of negotiation happens are Americans just going to get cut out here?” HASSETT: “Well, first of all, you have to understand that America is not going to have its economy harmed by what the Iranians are doing.” [Laughs] “The bottom line is that in the ‘70s we didn’t produce much oil, but now we do.” “And so America is in a very strong position. They think that they’re going to harm the U.S. economy and get President Trump to back down.” “There couldn’t be anything that was a stupider thing to say because the bottom line is that our economy has got all this momentum in the world and we have lots and lots of oil.” “We have lots of trading partners that are more on the hook for imported oil from these guys.” “And as we can see, it’s completely unacceptable that a government that would, you know, murder 40,000 of their people just a few months ago would be blackmailing countries to let stuff through.” “President Trump thinks that is unacceptable.”

Overton

577,730 次观看 • 6 个月前

.Vice President JD Vance: What I saw in that Signal chat and what I've seen in President Donald J. Trump' national security team is that sometimes we agree and sometimes we disagree, but it's important that we ALL have an honest conversation amongst ourselves and with the President about what we think is in the best interest of the national security of the United States. I support the President's decision to strike the Houthis.

.Vice President JD Vance: What I saw in that Signal chat and what I've seen in President Donald J. Trump' national security team is that sometimes we agree and sometimes we disagree, but it's important that we ALL have an honest conversation amongst ourselves and with the President about what we think is in the best interest of the national security of the United States. I support the President's decision to strike the Houthis.

Rapid Response 47

210,122 次观看 • 1 年前

Vice President Vance lays down the law on the Iranian regime with a blistering update from the White House podium. He made it clear that there is an opportunity for Iran to “reset” their relationship with the U.S. — if they are unwilling, option B is on the table and the U.S. is “locked and loaded.” VANCE: “Now, what we did here is that we effectively degraded their conventional military capability. That has been done, that has been successfully done.” “But where we are now is the president has asked us, has told us, to aggressively negotiate with the Iranians.” “On that core issue of never having a nuclear weapon, we think that we’ve made a lot of progress. We think the Iranians want to make a deal. The president of United States has asked us to negotiate in good faith, and that’s exactly what we’ve done.” “So we’re in a pretty good spot here. But there’s an option B, and the option B is that we could restart the military campaign to continue to prosecute the case, to continue to try to achieve America’s objectives.” “And we could talk a little bit about what that looks like, but that’s not what the president wants. And I don’t think it’s what the Iranians want either.” “We have an opportunity here, I think, to reset the relationship that has existed between Iran and the United States for 47 years.” “That’s what the president has asked us to do, and that’s what we’re going to keep on working at.” “But it takes two to tango. We are not going to have a deal that allows the Iranians to have a nuclear weapon.” “So as the president just told me, we’re locked and loaded.” “We don’t want to go down that pathway, but the president is willing and able to go down that pathway if we have to.”

Vice President Vance lays down the law on the Iranian regime with a blistering update from the White House podium. He made it clear that there is an opportunity for Iran to “reset” their relationship with the U.S. — if they are unwilling, option B is on the table and the U.S. is “locked and loaded.” VANCE: “Now, what we did here is that we effectively degraded their conventional military capability. That has been done, that has been successfully done.” “But where we are now is the president has asked us, has told us, to aggressively negotiate with the Iranians.” “On that core issue of never having a nuclear weapon, we think that we’ve made a lot of progress. We think the Iranians want to make a deal. The president of United States has asked us to negotiate in good faith, and that’s exactly what we’ve done.” “So we’re in a pretty good spot here. But there’s an option B, and the option B is that we could restart the military campaign to continue to prosecute the case, to continue to try to achieve America’s objectives.” “And we could talk a little bit about what that looks like, but that’s not what the president wants. And I don’t think it’s what the Iranians want either.” “We have an opportunity here, I think, to reset the relationship that has existed between Iran and the United States for 47 years.” “That’s what the president has asked us to do, and that’s what we’re going to keep on working at.” “But it takes two to tango. We are not going to have a deal that allows the Iranians to have a nuclear weapon.” “So as the president just told me, we’re locked and loaded.” “We don’t want to go down that pathway, but the president is willing and able to go down that pathway if we have to.”

Overton

13,776 次观看 • 4 个月前

The UFO topic has moments of momentum and also calm. It's like a STORM. This is a moment of momentum. What will we make of it? If we desire transparency regarding the UFO presence on planet Earth, we will need to face a new and emerging reality - that includes UFOs. If we want disclosure, we don’t ask for it; we enforce it. Take direct action to remove the layers that have obscured the truth from the public - like pulling off the wrappings and exposing the wound. We are facing a new consensus reality. And that is exciting! WATCH :

The UFO topic has moments of momentum and also calm. It's like a STORM. This is a moment of momentum. What will we make of it? If we desire transparency regarding the UFO presence on planet Earth, we will need to face a new and emerging reality - that includes UFOs. If we want disclosure, we don’t ask for it; we enforce it. Take direct action to remove the layers that have obscured the truth from the public - like pulling off the wrappings and exposing the wound. We are facing a new consensus reality. And that is exciting! WATCH :

Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell

13,691 次观看 • 10 个月前

This is exactly right from David Sacks interview with Bret Baier: "One of the things that Jacob and others have claimed is we can reach a deal with China, and that if we pause, they will pause. And there is simply no basis for believing that. Chinese officials have never said that and, in fact, if you look at the statements of Chinese officials and their AI companies, they believe that AI is something that's very good for their economy and they are interested in moving that forward...if we do try to pause or stop our AI development, we will play into China’s hands."

This is exactly right from David Sacks interview with Bret Baier: "One of the things that Jacob and others have claimed is we can reach a deal with China, and that if we pause, they will pause. And there is simply no basis for believing that. Chinese officials have never said that and, in fact, if you look at the statements of Chinese officials and their AI companies, they believe that AI is something that's very good for their economy and they are interested in moving that forward...if we do try to pause or stop our AI development, we will play into China’s hands."

Innovation Council

84,862 次观看 • 24 天前

🚨 OBAMA RIPS THE "MARKET WILL TAKE CARE OF IT" APPROACH TO AI: "That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies." Obama: "My view this week has been it is good that some of the leading companies have said we need to slow this down, and we should encourage that. There have been some on the left who’ve said we shouldn’t allow them to make that decision. I agree that that can’t be a long-term solution. Government has to be regulating this. I heard one of Donald Trump’s main advisers on this make the argument that the market will take care of it. These companies will solve the safety issues because they have every incentive to do so. If it turns out to be dangerous, people will just sue them. And they’re worried about financial liability. That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies. We now have 150 years of experience just letting the market do whatever it wants when it comes to things that deeply affect our health and our safety. And so, there’s no replacement for an effective, government regulatory structure. And the challenge we have is that obviously, we have a president currently that has said that’s for losers. So, we’ve got a gap, at least of a couple of years, where things are moving really fast, and we have an administration that is not capable of or willing to, I would argue both, of putting together a serious regulatory framework, which is why I actually think we should be encouraging some sort of voluntary industry restraint, not because it’s a replacement, but because that may be the best we can do for now until we can get Congress and the White House to start getting serious about this."

🚨 OBAMA RIPS THE "MARKET WILL TAKE CARE OF IT" APPROACH TO AI: "That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies." Obama: "My view this week has been it is good that some of the leading companies have said we need to slow this down, and we should encourage that. There have been some on the left who’ve said we shouldn’t allow them to make that decision. I agree that that can’t be a long-term solution. Government has to be regulating this. I heard one of Donald Trump’s main advisers on this make the argument that the market will take care of it. These companies will solve the safety issues because they have every incentive to do so. If it turns out to be dangerous, people will just sue them. And they’re worried about financial liability. That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies. We now have 150 years of experience just letting the market do whatever it wants when it comes to things that deeply affect our health and our safety. And so, there’s no replacement for an effective, government regulatory structure. And the challenge we have is that obviously, we have a president currently that has said that’s for losers. So, we’ve got a gap, at least of a couple of years, where things are moving really fast, and we have an administration that is not capable of or willing to, I would argue both, of putting together a serious regulatory framework, which is why I actually think we should be encouraging some sort of voluntary industry restraint, not because it’s a replacement, but because that may be the best we can do for now until we can get Congress and the White House to start getting serious about this."

MeidasTouch

128,359 次观看 • 15 天前

🚨 OBAMA RIPS THE "MARKET WILL TAKE CARE OF IT" APPROACH TO AI: "That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies." Obama: "My view this week has been it is good that some of the leading companies have said we need to slow this down, and we should encourage that. There have been some on the left who’ve said we shouldn’t allow them to make that decision. I agree that that can’t be a long-term solution. Government has to be regulating this. I heard one of Donald Trump’s main advisers on this make the argument that the market will take care of it. These companies will solve the safety issues because they have every incentive to do so. If it turns out to be dangerous, people will just sue them. And they’re worried about financial liability. That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies. We now have 150 years of experience just letting the market do whatever it wants when it comes to things that deeply affect our health and our safety. And so, there’s no replacement for an effective, government regulatory structure. And the challenge we have is that obviously, we have a president currently that has said that’s for losers. So, we’ve got a gap, at least of a couple of years, where things are moving really fast, and we have an administration that is not capable of or willing to, I would argue both, of putting together a serious regulatory framework, which is why I actually think we should be encouraging some sort of voluntary industry restraint, not because it’s a replacement, but because that may be the best we can do for now until we can get Congress and the White House to start getting serious about this."

🚨 OBAMA RIPS THE "MARKET WILL TAKE CARE OF IT" APPROACH TO AI: "That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies." Obama: "My view this week has been it is good that some of the leading companies have said we need to slow this down, and we should encourage that. There have been some on the left who’ve said we shouldn’t allow them to make that decision. I agree that that can’t be a long-term solution. Government has to be regulating this. I heard one of Donald Trump’s main advisers on this make the argument that the market will take care of it. These companies will solve the safety issues because they have every incentive to do so. If it turns out to be dangerous, people will just sue them. And they’re worried about financial liability. That’s not how we treat airlines, or drug companies, or food companies. We now have 150 years of experience just letting the market do whatever it wants when it comes to things that deeply affect our health and our safety. And so, there’s no replacement for an effective, government regulatory structure. And the challenge we have is that obviously, we have a president currently that has said that’s for losers. So, we’ve got a gap, at least of a couple of years, where things are moving really fast, and we have an administration that is not capable of or willing to, I would argue both, of putting together a serious regulatory framework, which is why I actually think we should be encouraging some sort of voluntary industry restraint, not because it’s a replacement, but because that may be the best we can do for now until we can get Congress and the White House to start getting serious about this."

MeidasTouch

54,729 次观看 • 15 天前

Unifor National President Lana Payne: "We were always going to end up in this place. And I say that because what we have seen from the U.S. administration under Donald Trump is this consistent attempt to try and destroy the industrial economy of Canada with tariffs."

Unifor National President Lana Payne: "We were always going to end up in this place. And I say that because what we have seen from the U.S. administration under Donald Trump is this consistent attempt to try and destroy the industrial economy of Canada with tariffs."

Scott Robertson

15,556 次观看 • 1 个月前

BREAKING: British Columbian Premier David Eby just went off on Trump, saying that Trump is working to collapse the American economy and force Canada into annexation. "We are angry and we are worried and we are anxious as Canadians of the unpredictable and chaotic actions of the President as he works to apparently collapse the US economy and bring Canada with it." "Trump has no regard for the chaos that he has been causing because we feel this is part of his strategy to hurt the Canadian economy and to force us into his vision of annexation to the United States of America, redrawing our borders and access to our water."

BREAKING: British Columbian Premier David Eby just went off on Trump, saying that Trump is working to collapse the American economy and force Canada into annexation. "We are angry and we are worried and we are anxious as Canadians of the unpredictable and chaotic actions of the President as he works to apparently collapse the US economy and bring Canada with it." "Trump has no regard for the chaos that he has been causing because we feel this is part of his strategy to hurt the Canadian economy and to force us into his vision of annexation to the United States of America, redrawing our borders and access to our water."

Ed Krassenstein

156,058 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | Delhi: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "I think a good idea would be that we frame the discussion not on us saying what you have not done and not on you saying what we have not done, but simply saying that what are we going to do for the people in India in the future, what are the action steps that we need to take. So I would say that it would be an interesting experiment to see if instead of you blaming us and we blaming you, we can try and say on this one issue where we agree, there's no disagreement, there we say, listen, let us just talk about the future of people of India." (Source: Sansad TV)

#WATCH | Delhi: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "I think a good idea would be that we frame the discussion not on us saying what you have not done and not on you saying what we have not done, but simply saying that what are we going to do for the people in India in the future, what are the action steps that we need to take. So I would say that it would be an interesting experiment to see if instead of you blaming us and we blaming you, we can try and say on this one issue where we agree, there's no disagreement, there we say, listen, let us just talk about the future of people of India." (Source: Sansad TV)

ANI

148,526 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 NOW — JESSE WATTERS NAILS IT: "This is not an equal thing. China and the United States, we have a lot more nukes, we have a lot more carriers, we just beat them to the moon, we just kicked them out of the Panama Canal, and we just wiped out two of their black market gas stations..." "...and showed that we can, if we want to, embargo them if they get frisky with Taiwan — because we control the Straits in the South China Sea and in the Middle East." "And while we've been in Iran, we've been doing war games with all of our billion in weapons to Taiwan, and we have another $25 billion arms package waiting on the president's desk." "He doesn't want to sign it there. It's too humiliating for the Chinese. So he'll wait." "China is still our number one trade partner, though. So there are going to be big business deals announced with Boeing and agriculture. The problem is the chips we make need their minerals." "So we're on a little bit of a smash and grab mineral run all over the world, which has been fun to watch." "We still have about a 50 percent tariff rate on the Chinese, but Trump has cultivated a very good relationship with Xi Jinping over the last eight or so years." "Doesn't mean he's not going to hit him with charges against hacking and spying and dumping." "They love to dump dumping goods all over the world because their consumers don't buy. And the quarantine, along with our chip controls, are really starting to show cracks in the Chinese economy." "So the test is, how long is China willing to wait until they call the gay Ayatollah and say you got to open up the street?" "I think Xi's watching Trump. How long is Trump willing to maintain the blockade on Iran? So right now it's a test of wills. And I think the president is in a good place."

🚨 NOW — JESSE WATTERS NAILS IT: "This is not an equal thing. China and the United States, we have a lot more nukes, we have a lot more carriers, we just beat them to the moon, we just kicked them out of the Panama Canal, and we just wiped out two of their black market gas stations..." "...and showed that we can, if we want to, embargo them if they get frisky with Taiwan — because we control the Straits in the South China Sea and in the Middle East." "And while we've been in Iran, we've been doing war games with all of our billion in weapons to Taiwan, and we have another $25 billion arms package waiting on the president's desk." "He doesn't want to sign it there. It's too humiliating for the Chinese. So he'll wait." "China is still our number one trade partner, though. So there are going to be big business deals announced with Boeing and agriculture. The problem is the chips we make need their minerals." "So we're on a little bit of a smash and grab mineral run all over the world, which has been fun to watch." "We still have about a 50 percent tariff rate on the Chinese, but Trump has cultivated a very good relationship with Xi Jinping over the last eight or so years." "Doesn't mean he's not going to hit him with charges against hacking and spying and dumping." "They love to dump dumping goods all over the world because their consumers don't buy. And the quarantine, along with our chip controls, are really starting to show cracks in the Chinese economy." "So the test is, how long is China willing to wait until they call the gay Ayatollah and say you got to open up the street?" "I think Xi's watching Trump. How long is Trump willing to maintain the blockade on Iran? So right now it's a test of wills. And I think the president is in a good place."

Eric Daugherty

111,678 次观看 • 4 个月前

Jean Charest: "We're not as big as the United States. We know that. We have to be more strategic. We have to be smarter. And we have to have a hard look at ourselves and our own economy and what it is that we have to do here at home to make ourselves more competitive. So that 20 years from now we thank Donald Trump."

Jean Charest: "We're not as big as the United States. We know that. We have to be more strategic. We have to be smarter. And we have to have a hard look at ourselves and our own economy and what it is that we have to do here at home to make ourselves more competitive. So that 20 years from now we thank Donald Trump."

Scott Robertson

153,492 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨“The Chinese, who manufacture virtually all of our solar panels…have been installing cellular radios inside the inverters, which can act as kill switches," says Michael Shellenberger "There was actually a Chinese solar company that turned off the solar panels and sent up a little message to its users, saying: we've turned this off because these solar panels are only authorized to be used in certain countries. …So we know that the Chinese solar companies—all of which essentially can be used as arms of the Chinese military…they are able to to switch off large amounts of solar. And if you are able to do that, then you are able to cause the de-powering and blackouts of the grid. How big of a problem is this? …I think most national security experts view this as something that the Chinese could do if there was, for example, an invasion of Taiwan, and the United States decided to defend Taiwan. The Chinese could potentially trigger blackouts in the United States and Europe. As crazy as that sounds, that is the reality."

🚨“The Chinese, who manufacture virtually all of our solar panels…have been installing cellular radios inside the inverters, which can act as kill switches," says Michael Shellenberger "There was actually a Chinese solar company that turned off the solar panels and sent up a little message to its users, saying: we've turned this off because these solar panels are only authorized to be used in certain countries. …So we know that the Chinese solar companies—all of which essentially can be used as arms of the Chinese military…they are able to to switch off large amounts of solar. And if you are able to do that, then you are able to cause the de-powering and blackouts of the grid. How big of a problem is this? …I think most national security experts view this as something that the Chinese could do if there was, for example, an invasion of Taiwan, and the United States decided to defend Taiwan. The Chinese could potentially trigger blackouts in the United States and Europe. As crazy as that sounds, that is the reality."

Jan Jekielek

549,392 次观看 • 1 年前

Chamath: "Nvidia is not doing what's in the best interest of the United States." 🇺🇸🇨🇳 "I think we can all do the math. About 47% of all of NVIDIA's revenue goes to China and Chinese-related countries." "And I think when you peel back this onion, what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a waystation for China." "And I think that is the big problem." "Let's have a thought starter: if 47% of all of the AI capability and horsepower is being shipped to three Asian countries, where do you think the apps that require that amount of horsepower live?" "Is there a Cursor of Bhutan that we did not know? Is there a great shopping app in Cambodia that's come out of nowhere, that's AI powered?" "I think the answer is no." "Every single time we have an advance in the United States, how is it that Alibaba shows up with something incredible? DeepSeek shows up with something better?" "At every turn and at every step of AI, they are at the same rate or one step ahead." "To be honest with you, I think the real problem that we have is that Nvidia is not doing what is in the best interest of the United States." "You have a American company that has been working around the guidelines at every turn to try to land silicon into the hands of China." "Late last year, they introduced this thing called the H20 that was explicitly designed for China and to be compliant with US rules at the time." "Which again, gives these guys substantial performance." "This is a case where (Nvidia) has plausible deniability. I sell something to a Singaporean registered company? Plausible deniability." "What am I supposed to do? You can't expect me to audit it. I think that's what NVIDIA's answer will be to this question." "But what is the real expectation? At a minimum, the United States should have a mechanism to understand it." "It is implausible that if you did one or two layers of work, you would not find that most of this traffic is being used by Chinese organizations."

Chamath: "Nvidia is not doing what's in the best interest of the United States." 🇺🇸🇨🇳 "I think we can all do the math. About 47% of all of NVIDIA's revenue goes to China and Chinese-related countries." "And I think when you peel back this onion, what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a waystation for China." "And I think that is the big problem." "Let's have a thought starter: if 47% of all of the AI capability and horsepower is being shipped to three Asian countries, where do you think the apps that require that amount of horsepower live?" "Is there a Cursor of Bhutan that we did not know? Is there a great shopping app in Cambodia that's come out of nowhere, that's AI powered?" "I think the answer is no." "Every single time we have an advance in the United States, how is it that Alibaba shows up with something incredible? DeepSeek shows up with something better?" "At every turn and at every step of AI, they are at the same rate or one step ahead." "To be honest with you, I think the real problem that we have is that Nvidia is not doing what is in the best interest of the United States." "You have a American company that has been working around the guidelines at every turn to try to land silicon into the hands of China." "Late last year, they introduced this thing called the H20 that was explicitly designed for China and to be compliant with US rules at the time." "Which again, gives these guys substantial performance." "This is a case where (Nvidia) has plausible deniability. I sell something to a Singaporean registered company? Plausible deniability." "What am I supposed to do? You can't expect me to audit it. I think that's what NVIDIA's answer will be to this question." "But what is the real expectation? At a minimum, the United States should have a mechanism to understand it." "It is implausible that if you did one or two layers of work, you would not find that most of this traffic is being used by Chinese organizations."

The All-In Podcast

910,450 次观看 • 1 年前