Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

WATCH: Rep. Dan Crenshaw DESTROYS Rep. Jamie Raskin for BLOCKING three affordability bipartisan bills ahead of the midterms in a HEATED debate When Democrats run out of answers, they yell Trump corruption! If those same bills pass now that the votes are counted, who's going to ask Democrats why...

devorydarkins's profile picture

DeVory Darkins

88,453 subscribers

207,752 views • 7 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Comments

Frank Seil's profile picture
Frank Seil7 days ago

Anyone ever hear how the left was going to accomplish what they claim Trump did wrong

Randal Cole's profile picture
Randal Cole7 days ago

This has been the MO of both parties for decades. It’s a sickening waste of time and hurts Americans. There are tons of things that Americans wanted that can’t get through the political wickets. Then you have an ignorant electorate voting in idiots out of frustration.

SSA's profile picture
SSA7 days ago

Raskin is an absolute embarrassment to Maryland

Brian Myers's profile picture
Brian Myers7 days ago

Raskin is a scumbag.

STARR007🇺🇸's profile picture
STARR007🇺🇸7 days ago

I have to give it Dan Crenshaw and I’m definitely not a fan.

Related Videos

Dan Crenshaw put Jamie Raskin on the spot, accusing Senate Democrats of blocking bills on national security, affordability, and insider trading just to stop Republicans from getting a political win. But Raskin pushed back and turned the argument toward Trump. What happened next made this exchange even more heated. Host: Congressman Crenshaw, you will not be voting if there is an impeachment. You will not be here in the next Congress. Dan Crenshaw: It’s a little hard to believe the Democrats aren’t going to want to impeach Trump. It’s sort of a pastime, but I do hope there are things they can work on. Jamie Raskin: It’s our pastime to defend the Constitution. If he commits high crimes and misdemeanors, he’s subjecting himself to impeachment. Dan Crenshaw: How about FISA reform? We couldn’t get that passed. A lot of Democrats who were always for it all of a sudden were against it. How about the Taxpayer Protection Act? It passed out of the House overwhelmingly. Who blocked it? Senate Democrats. Why? Midterms. Don’t give Republicans a win. Let’s look at another one, the Stop Insider Trading Act. That corruption was a major campaign issue. Jamie Raskin: You’ll see that happen. Dan Crenshaw: Why did the Senate Democrats block the Stop Insider Trading Act? Jamie Raskin: You think Donald Trump wants to stop insider trading in the executive branch? Dan Crenshaw: I think he would vote for it. It passed overwhelmingly from Republicans. Jamie Raskin: Their whole administration is about insider trading. Dan Crenshaw: You are missing the point. Jamie Raskin: No, you’re missing the point, and you guys lost the election because you missed the point. Dan Crenshaw: These are pieces of legislation that would help the affordability issue, tackle corruption, and help national security things you guys agreed on. Stop Insider Trading Act, Taxpayer Protection Act, FISA. You guys blocked all of that because the midterms were coming. And I bet you’re going to be in favor of it after the midterms. Do not lie and say anything different. Jamie Raskin: All right. That’s politics.
2:26

Dan Crenshaw put Jamie Raskin on the spot, accusing Senate Democrats of blocking bills on national security, affordability, and insider trading just to stop Republicans from getting a political win. But Raskin pushed back and turned the argument toward Trump. What happened next made this exchange even more heated. Host: Congressman Crenshaw, you will not be voting if there is an impeachment. You will not be here in the next Congress. Dan Crenshaw: It’s a little hard to believe the Democrats aren’t going to want to impeach Trump. It’s sort of a pastime, but I do hope there are things they can work on. Jamie Raskin: It’s our pastime to defend the Constitution. If he commits high crimes and misdemeanors, he’s subjecting himself to impeachment. Dan Crenshaw: How about FISA reform? We couldn’t get that passed. A lot of Democrats who were always for it all of a sudden were against it. How about the Taxpayer Protection Act? It passed out of the House overwhelmingly. Who blocked it? Senate Democrats. Why? Midterms. Don’t give Republicans a win. Let’s look at another one, the Stop Insider Trading Act. That corruption was a major campaign issue. Jamie Raskin: You’ll see that happen. Dan Crenshaw: Why did the Senate Democrats block the Stop Insider Trading Act? Jamie Raskin: You think Donald Trump wants to stop insider trading in the executive branch? Dan Crenshaw: I think he would vote for it. It passed overwhelmingly from Republicans. Jamie Raskin: Their whole administration is about insider trading. Dan Crenshaw: You are missing the point. Jamie Raskin: No, you’re missing the point, and you guys lost the election because you missed the point. Dan Crenshaw: These are pieces of legislation that would help the affordability issue, tackle corruption, and help national security things you guys agreed on. Stop Insider Trading Act, Taxpayer Protection Act, FISA. You guys blocked all of that because the midterms were coming. And I bet you’re going to be in favor of it after the midterms. Do not lie and say anything different. Jamie Raskin: All right. That’s politics.

Melius 😈

252,586 views • 7 days ago

I don’t know if Rep. Raskin genuinely doesn’t understand basic civics and what Congressional Democrats have been doing for the past two years, or if he’s just being disingenuous. Probably a mix of both. Americans should be righteously angry with Democrats for blocking bipartisan legislation that would have measurably improved their lives and cleaned up Washington. Legislation to stop members of Congress from trading stocks. Legislation to protect Americans from paying higher electricity bills to subsidize massive data centers. Legislation to strengthen our national security. All passed the House. All blocked by Senate Democrats. It was a cynical political calculation to deny Republicans any wins before the midterms, then campaign on the very problems they refused to help solve. And voters fell for it.
1:10

I don’t know if Rep. Raskin genuinely doesn’t understand basic civics and what Congressional Democrats have been doing for the past two years, or if he’s just being disingenuous. Probably a mix of both. Americans should be righteously angry with Democrats for blocking bipartisan legislation that would have measurably improved their lives and cleaned up Washington. Legislation to stop members of Congress from trading stocks. Legislation to protect Americans from paying higher electricity bills to subsidize massive data centers. Legislation to strengthen our national security. All passed the House. All blocked by Senate Democrats. It was a cynical political calculation to deny Republicans any wins before the midterms, then campaign on the very problems they refused to help solve. And voters fell for it.

Dan Crenshaw

75,924 views • 6 days ago

Q: What would you tell a resident who is waiting for relief from the cost of living? Roy Cooper: I would tell them to go vote and participate in our democracy. We have a president now that is saying that affordability is not a real issue. And my opponent, Michael Whatley, agrees with that. Do you want Michael Whatley, who's going to bring more of the same of the corruption and the failure to do anything about the cost of living in Washington? Or do you want someone who's ready to bring change?
1:16

Q: What would you tell a resident who is waiting for relief from the cost of living? Roy Cooper: I would tell them to go vote and participate in our democracy. We have a president now that is saying that affordability is not a real issue. And my opponent, Michael Whatley, agrees with that. Do you want Michael Whatley, who's going to bring more of the same of the corruption and the failure to do anything about the cost of living in Washington? Or do you want someone who's ready to bring change?

Team Roy Cooper

10,513 views • 13 days ago

Democrats blocked my Ratepayer Protection Act and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they don't care about affordability. This was their chance to help lower electricity prices for American families—and they said no.
0:56

Democrats blocked my Ratepayer Protection Act and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they don't care about affordability. This was their chance to help lower electricity prices for American families—and they said no.

Senator Jon Husted

19,779 views • 1 month ago

Rep Eli Crane openly says Democrats are rigging elections with illegals voting - Democrats are blocking a simple question that’s asks “Are you a US citizen” on the next Census - Democrats are letting illegals vote in their elections - They’re blocking Voter ID - They blocked the SAVE Act “You guys try and block every single effort that we make in this house to stop illegal aliens from voting. You guys blocked the SAVE Act as well. That's exactly what this is. You guys are trying to rig elections and we're trying to stop it, and we're not going to apologize for it.” Democrats power is fueled by illegal immigration
1:50

Rep Eli Crane openly says Democrats are rigging elections with illegals voting - Democrats are blocking a simple question that’s asks “Are you a US citizen” on the next Census - Democrats are letting illegals vote in their elections - They’re blocking Voter ID - They blocked the SAVE Act “You guys try and block every single effort that we make in this house to stop illegal aliens from voting. You guys blocked the SAVE Act as well. That's exactly what this is. You guys are trying to rig elections and we're trying to stop it, and we're not going to apologize for it.” Democrats power is fueled by illegal immigration

Wall Street Apes

96,911 views • 11 months ago

Chuck Schumer and Senate Democrats are blocking Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act because he doesn't want Republicans to earn a bipartisan win ahead of the midterms. Pathetic.
0:54

Chuck Schumer and Senate Democrats are blocking Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act because he doesn't want Republicans to earn a bipartisan win ahead of the midterms. Pathetic.

Team Trump (Text TRUMP to 88022)

30,488 views • 1 month ago

"I feel that if you vote for Kamala Harris, you are going to be rewarding genocide. You are rewarding the Biden administration for genocide. If you let them run away with this, there's no telling what they're going to do...[I]f they feel like you're always going to come back regardless, why would they do anything for you? Why, why would they give you universal health care? Why would they give you free public universities? Why would they do this? Why would they bring back the child tax credit? Why, why would they do those things if they know that in the end, you're still going to support the party?" - Sabby Sabs
2:58

"I feel that if you vote for Kamala Harris, you are going to be rewarding genocide. You are rewarding the Biden administration for genocide. If you let them run away with this, there's no telling what they're going to do...[I]f they feel like you're always going to come back regardless, why would they do anything for you? Why, why would they give you universal health care? Why would they give you free public universities? Why would they do this? Why would they bring back the child tax credit? Why, why would they do those things if they know that in the end, you're still going to support the party?" - Sabby Sabs

Briahna Joy Gray

101,967 views • 2 years ago

CASONE: The midterms are about affordability. Then on top of that, you've got the energy shock REP. PAT FALLON: Sure. Joe Biden and the Democrats did that
0:37

CASONE: The midterms are about affordability. Then on top of that, you've got the energy shock REP. PAT FALLON: Sure. Joe Biden and the Democrats did that

Aaron Rupar

490,524 views • 3 months ago

ICYMI: Senate Democrats blocked legislation that would pay the Coast Guard in the event of a government shutdown.
15:06

ICYMI: Senate Democrats blocked legislation that would pay the Coast Guard in the event of a government shutdown.

Senator Ted Cruz

176,875 views • 3 years ago

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."
2:55

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."

The Bulwark

25,818 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸 THE CLARITY ACT NEEDS SEVEN DEMOCRATS. THE LOUDEST VOICES IN THAT PARTY SAY IT LEGALIZES CORRUPTION. Ben McKenzie, beside three Democratic senators: "You cannot say you oppose Trump's crypto corruption and then vote to enable that same corruption." Republicans can't pass it alone. Democrats won't pass it as written. The bill isn't short on votes. It's short on a reason for those votes to change.
0:58

🇺🇸 THE CLARITY ACT NEEDS SEVEN DEMOCRATS. THE LOUDEST VOICES IN THAT PARTY SAY IT LEGALIZES CORRUPTION. Ben McKenzie, beside three Democratic senators: "You cannot say you oppose Trump's crypto corruption and then vote to enable that same corruption." Republicans can't pass it alone. Democrats won't pass it as written. The bill isn't short on votes. It's short on a reason for those votes to change.

Merlijn The Trader

52,794 views • 3 months ago

Bang-on take from Mr. Jennings. CNN panelist Kmele Foster was making the argument that President Trump is “radioactive” for ALL Republicans heading into the midterms. Scott Jennings flipped the script on him completely and zoomed out 30,000 feet. Trump has been at the center of American politics for 10 years now. Trying to make him “disappear” from the political conversation is not a strategy by itself. JENNINGS: “The only thing you can do in a political campaign is make your argument and draw the line.” “Hence my question to the Democrats: what bill would you pass?” “What taxes would you cut?” “What would you do?” “The question is, if you voted for Democrats, do you anticipate that they would be able to, after years of advocating against, say, domestic energy supply — do you anticipate them being able to bring down the cost of gas or anything else?” “That’s crazy.” The Democrats offer no solutions to any of the problems that Trump is trying to solve. If they want to make the midterms a referendum on Trump, Republicans can make the conversation about what Democrats would actually do if they win. They have no plan other than more lunacy.
1:08

Bang-on take from Mr. Jennings. CNN panelist Kmele Foster was making the argument that President Trump is “radioactive” for ALL Republicans heading into the midterms. Scott Jennings flipped the script on him completely and zoomed out 30,000 feet. Trump has been at the center of American politics for 10 years now. Trying to make him “disappear” from the political conversation is not a strategy by itself. JENNINGS: “The only thing you can do in a political campaign is make your argument and draw the line.” “Hence my question to the Democrats: what bill would you pass?” “What taxes would you cut?” “What would you do?” “The question is, if you voted for Democrats, do you anticipate that they would be able to, after years of advocating against, say, domestic energy supply — do you anticipate them being able to bring down the cost of gas or anything else?” “That’s crazy.” The Democrats offer no solutions to any of the problems that Trump is trying to solve. If they want to make the midterms a referendum on Trump, Republicans can make the conversation about what Democrats would actually do if they win. They have no plan other than more lunacy.

Overton

112,206 views • 1 month ago

There Should Be People Going to Prison Michael Laws, 8 Dec 2022: "We now know that whether you're vaxxed or not, it doesn't stop transmission, and the question you ask, is when did they know that? And if the answer to that question is we knew it before we put in the mandates, there should be people going to prison. Because that would then mean that you purposefully lied to all of us."
4:03

There Should Be People Going to Prison Michael Laws, 8 Dec 2022: "We now know that whether you're vaxxed or not, it doesn't stop transmission, and the question you ask, is when did they know that? And if the answer to that question is we knew it before we put in the mandates, there should be people going to prison. Because that would then mean that you purposefully lied to all of us."

Coronavirus Plushie

43,863 views • 10 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."
1:03

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."

Eric Daugherty

304,559 views • 8 months ago

Trump on eliminating the Filibuster… He might just be giving you the playbook on how the rest of this plan gets rolled out… “I am totally in favor of terminating the filibuster, and we would be back to work within 10 minutes after that vote took place, and lots of other good things would happen. Here's some of the things that we'd pass if we terminated the filibuster, voter ID, no mail in, voting, no cash bail, no men and women's sports, no welfare for illegals. You could go on and on. This is two pages of things would do if you did that without it. I don't know that you passed anything, because you can't deal with them. But if we do it. We will never lose the midterms, and we will never lose the general election, because we will have produced so many different things for our people, for the people, for the country, that it would be impossible to lose an election. ….. if the filibuster is terminated, we will have the most productive three years in the history of our country. If the filibuster is not terminated, then we will be in a slog with the Democrats, and very little for either party will be done. So it's a good thing.”
1:39

Trump on eliminating the Filibuster… He might just be giving you the playbook on how the rest of this plan gets rolled out… “I am totally in favor of terminating the filibuster, and we would be back to work within 10 minutes after that vote took place, and lots of other good things would happen. Here's some of the things that we'd pass if we terminated the filibuster, voter ID, no mail in, voting, no cash bail, no men and women's sports, no welfare for illegals. You could go on and on. This is two pages of things would do if you did that without it. I don't know that you passed anything, because you can't deal with them. But if we do it. We will never lose the midterms, and we will never lose the general election, because we will have produced so many different things for our people, for the people, for the country, that it would be impossible to lose an election. ….. if the filibuster is terminated, we will have the most productive three years in the history of our country. If the filibuster is not terminated, then we will be in a slog with the Democrats, and very little for either party will be done. So it's a good thing.”

NewsTreason Channel 17

59,548 views • 1 year ago

Watch Rep. Raskin unravel when I point out what the GOP should have been doing all along: telling the truth. Democrats BLOCKED bipartisan legislation on data centers (force them to pay for their own power), and BLOCKED bipartisan legislation to stop stock trading. Why? Because they wanted to RUN ON THESE ISSUES IN THE MIDTERMS. Yes, it’s a classic cynical political ploy, and the public almost always falls for it. Smart politics? Yes. Ethical governance? Hell no. Raskin even admitted that he believed good policy should take a back seat to good politics. That mentality disgusts me. Doing what's right for the country matters more than winning elections. My insufferable democrat colleague disagrees – or maybe he understands it perfectly well and just doesn't care. I'm not going to apologize for defending President Trump and American national security. And I'm not going to pretend that losing an election suddenly makes those policies wrong. And Republicans? Learn the right lessons. Yall f***ed up. Badly. You spent hundreds of millions of dollars on transgender ads instead of explaining why Democrats caused high prices and how Republican policies saved people money on their taxes and reduce costs in the long term. I’m defending Trump because his policies are good for the long term, not designed for short term popularity. Perfect? No. But a hell of a lot better than the alternatives. Double down on your agenda, Mr. President.
7:57

Watch Rep. Raskin unravel when I point out what the GOP should have been doing all along: telling the truth. Democrats BLOCKED bipartisan legislation on data centers (force them to pay for their own power), and BLOCKED bipartisan legislation to stop stock trading. Why? Because they wanted to RUN ON THESE ISSUES IN THE MIDTERMS. Yes, it’s a classic cynical political ploy, and the public almost always falls for it. Smart politics? Yes. Ethical governance? Hell no. Raskin even admitted that he believed good policy should take a back seat to good politics. That mentality disgusts me. Doing what's right for the country matters more than winning elections. My insufferable democrat colleague disagrees – or maybe he understands it perfectly well and just doesn't care. I'm not going to apologize for defending President Trump and American national security. And I'm not going to pretend that losing an election suddenly makes those policies wrong. And Republicans? Learn the right lessons. Yall f***ed up. Badly. You spent hundreds of millions of dollars on transgender ads instead of explaining why Democrats caused high prices and how Republican policies saved people money on their taxes and reduce costs in the long term. I’m defending Trump because his policies are good for the long term, not designed for short term popularity. Perfect? No. But a hell of a lot better than the alternatives. Double down on your agenda, Mr. President.

Dan Crenshaw

49,961 views • 7 days ago

Jamie Raskin promises Democrats will be going after corporations and law firms that "collaborated," "capitulated" and "surrendered" to Trump. Translation: We will try to destroy any company or firm that dared to work with the Trump administration. Examples must be made for defying the will of the Democrat party. It was all about healthcare and affordability, you guys.
1:14

Jamie Raskin promises Democrats will be going after corporations and law firms that "collaborated," "capitulated" and "surrendered" to Trump. Translation: We will try to destroy any company or firm that dared to work with the Trump administration. Examples must be made for defying the will of the Democrat party. It was all about healthcare and affordability, you guys.

Western Lensman

1,037,199 views • 7 days ago

.Michael Knowles tells FOX & Friends that affordability will be the primary issue driving the midterms: "Aftyn Behn...hated her constituents and she still got...close to this win. What happens in the midterms when you have much better Democrat candidates, when you have some worse Republican candidates? I think the economy is going to be the issue that is driving things."
0:48

.Michael Knowles tells FOX & Friends that affordability will be the primary issue driving the midterms: "Aftyn Behn...hated her constituents and she still got...close to this win. What happens in the midterms when you have much better Democrat candidates, when you have some worse Republican candidates? I think the economy is going to be the issue that is driving things."

Daily Wire

39,848 views • 11 months ago