Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
WATCH: Shermichael Singleton Singleton reminds the NewsNight panel criticizing Pete Hegseth's remarks that he DID serve and is fully aware of the fact that war is hell. SHERMICHAEL SINGLETON: Can I just make one point of objection to what Ana just said? You know, in politics, sometimes we make... show more
249,148 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 39
@MrShermichael Gotta love how @ananavarro talks for such a long time uninterrupted and @MrShermichael only gets a couple sentences out, if that, before @abbydphillip cuts him off and talks over him. Every show. (Okay, at least everyone that I have watched)
@MrShermichael @ananavarro @abbydphillip Many such cases
@kbean511 @MrShermichael That’s a man with integrity
@kbean511 @MrShermichael Yes indeed
@MrShermichael Here is another reason why I stopped watching Abby’s show! She allowed @ananavarro to minimize @PeteHegseth, but interrupted @MrShermichael! @CNN @abbydphillip
@MrShermichael Damn she talks a lot but says nothing 😭
@MrShermichael 🎼 like a dull knife/ that just ain't cuttin'
@MrShermichael Not only is Shermichael absolutely spot on in interjecting reality into that conversation, but, as a bonus, we also get to see the another classic @abbydphillip interruption and interjection - not because Shermichael is wrong, but because he is too right. cc: @jenvanlaar
@mattmiller757 @MrShermichael Who is Navarro to criticize anybody?
@MrShermichael I can remember when a certain president kept looking at his watch as service members departed in caskets and wives sobbed.
@MrShermichael We all do
@MrShermichael @AnaNavarro's condescending ass, as she sips her piss, needs to be fact-checked every single time she opens her fat mouth.
@MrShermichael Thanks for defending, Hegseth. Well said. 🇺🇸
@MrShermichael Did she put that much energy into Ilhan Omar’s remark about 9-11 when she said “Some people did something” when thousands were killed?!
@MrShermichael It’s tragic listening to these morons that truly have no idea what’s actually happening
@MrShermichael Ana drinks her cup to distract her face cracking in embarrassment. .@abbydphillip as usual defended her friend by saying she wasn't disrespecting his service. False. Ana intended to mock Hegseth by calling him a "Fox news host" with no experience. @bariweiss
She will never understand how people who believe in the United States 🇺🇸 have a connection to the leadership that @SecWar demonstrates. He is a throwback to the military leadership from the past. A guy who would be willing to lay down his life for your freedom. He is a soldier. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@MrShermichael Abby cannot let her panelists talk if they are making points that adequately counter talking heads.
@MrShermichael He is the best damn SecWar or SecDef we've ever had—end of story! You all just hate to see any form of success under the Trump administration. Did CNN cover the 13 service members slaughtered during Biden's surrender in Afghanistan?
@MrShermichael Stop making excuses for Ana. She’s an absolute disgrace and assumes she knows WAY more than she actually knows.
@MrShermichael Abby always interrupts people that doesn’t agree with her.
@MrShermichael People who watch the show are just stupid. Tragic things happened is a fact tragic things happen is a fact there's nothing wrong with having said it. These people will find anything to make people feel miserable. They are miserable people.
@MrShermichael Abby sat there quietly while Ana was speaking. But as soon as Shermichael said something she didn’t agree with, she just had to interrupt. Ana was struggling to articulate her point. It’s as if they are pulling whatever they can out of thin air to discredit and embarrass Trump.
@MrShermichael I couldn't be a prouder American today seeing @PeteHegseth leading Operation Epic Fury. Our USA soldiers adore him & recruitment numbers are way up.
@MrShermichael This show is unwatchable. Always talking over each other and annoying always. But to be fair, as soon as I would have seen Ana Navarro on, I would have changed the channel because she is a completely ugly on the inside individual.
@MrShermichael I guess..Deranged Nutcase Navero…is suppose to make CNN..fair and balanced..? Really..well all it really does..is it makes CNN insufferable and impossible to watch..! If she’s a republican..I’m Queen of England..!
Mr Singleton is a wonderful advocate for America and her patriots. SecWar Hegseth wasn’t talking to the press in that room. He was speaking to us, the vets and warfighters that have skin in this game. Some of us have bled on those fields, some of us have children there now. “Journalists” don’t understand the language because it’s direct, gruff even. It wasn’t for them though. Hegseth is a warfighter, and we’re damned lucky to have him.
@MrShermichael What does she mean “there’s been no official address to the nation”?? Trump only made two public statements, along with Hegseth, Rubio and even Centcom made official public statements
@MrShermichael She's old enough to remember "mission accomplished"? What do you remember bitch ?!! Hegseth signed on with the 101st Airborne there after "mission accomplished" while the fighting and dying was still go on !! Nobody with a brain gives one flying fuck what you remember bitch!!
@MrShermichael Every time she talks no interruption, as soon as he says a few words the interruptions begin
@MrShermichael CNN looks for the dumbest libtards and says that's who I want on our show every night
Dear Lord please shut her cock holster. As for the loss of six military personnel, we just had two Deputies killed in southern Missouri. We will reach six in no time. You don’t join the military for college money. If you think people don’t die in the military, let’s look at the training members alone.
@MrShermichael Deport her
@MrShermichael What a disgusting smear on Secretary @PeteHegseth’s military service by @ananavarro & then @abbydphillip who made excuses for her attacks. CNN should immediately fire them both — plus it would actually help their ratings
@MrShermichael Now do the 17 nations Obama and Biden bombed with no congressional approval...
Look at abby trying to jump in and “clarify” what Navarro said. lol she can’t help it. Ana Navarro has zero place on that panel other than to just spout ridiculous statements. Over and over she proves herself lacking in critical thinking or the ability to form coherent opinions other than what she’s been told to say.
@MrShermichael Ana can never admit she's wrong.
@MrShermichael Why does the liberal always get to talk uninterpreted, but the conservative speaker does not? BTW, Bush never said, "Mission Accomplished", he stood in front of a banner that the ship installed that said it. Facts matter.
@MrShermichael I can’t wait for the new owners to take over CNN..
![Everyone said Sanderson never talks about his gold medal. Stützle: "I respect him a lot [for not talking about it] because we have a bunch of Canadians in the room." Chabot: "It shows you a lot about the type of guy that he is. We're all aware that he won it but he never brings it up." I know someone who made their entire life about that gold medal... #GoSensGo](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2112269784985510234/amplify_video_thumb/2112269074789203969/img/WbvEbrzkhQpy_-7v.jpg)
![stefan van de graaff, director of “one of us,” on casting kit connor in the lead role: “that's actually really kind of incredible story. so we knew that we wanted to cast around the lead actor, which, in this case, is kit. he plays a character named youngest. we wanted to cast around it first. […] we went to independent, which is the talent agency that kit is repped by in the uk, and originally, we had approached other actors. i had kit on my shortlist as people that i wanted in the film, but when i reviewed his work, i thought he might just be a little bit too young for the role. so we actually went and approached a few other actors first, and we had one booked, but he got really sick and—literally two weeks before we were filming—so we went back to independent and they said, ‘who else are you looking at? is there anybody else that we can put on?’ and i had, again, reviewed kit's work in the past, and i said, ‘talk to me about kit. i love him. i think he's a brilliant actor. i think he has just the right look. i think he's a little young.’ and his agent was just really effusive about saying he's the most mature person you'll ever meet. he carries himself as an adult. yes, he's, you know, i think he was 19 at the time. but that will not come through in his effort and his, you know, his capability. and so i had a phone call with kit, and it was very clear that he punched well above his weight in terms of his age. he's wise beyond his years and was extremely talented and thorough, and so, cast him, and that has ended up being a really, really incredible sequence of events because i absolutely loved working with him, and i don't think the film is the film without him. so it's been very fortunate.” 🔗:](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2018919280130064454/amplify_video_thumb/2018916854908039168/img/_lDUumA24Lnaxujf.jpg)
![.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2055433938240430160/amplify_video_thumb/2055432224330375168/img/kn_e6MQZH_OREPMu.jpg)
![🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1999618259063308336/amplify_video_thumb/1999591424954957824/img/RtJss2MFC_SNRr-Z.jpg)