Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Watch this brief exchange between Shabbos Kestenbaum and Michael Knowles, where Shabbos presses Michael on believers’ obligation to call out evil, and Michael responds that he hates “that Candace is doing that show on Erika,” but that he doesn’t believe we should dwell on it. I’m interested in hearing... show more

Natalie Jean Beisner

118,854 subscribers

14,577 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

So Michael Knowles has decided to make a statement on Candace Owens. No, he doesn’t condemn her actions. He condemns us—who are condemning her actions. No, I’m not kidding. He summarizes what Candace Owens and her cult are doing as “criticizing and antagonizing” Erika Kirk. No, Michael Knowles. That’s not what’s going on. Candace is slandering Erika Kirk—of conspiring to murder her husband and the father of her children, Charlie Kirk. She is also accusing her of sexually grooming minors—both with zero evidence whatsoever. That is not merely “criticizing” and “antagonizing” Erika Kirk. That is one of the most wicked things you can accuse someone of baselessly. It's also interesting that you say we're obsessed with spending our time defending Erika Kirk yet you don't mention how obsessed Candace is in trying to destroy Erika and TPUSA? The fact that you are more concerned with that and the way we are critiquing Candace rather than what she is doing is very revealing of yourself. Michael Knowles

So Michael Knowles has decided to make a statement on Candace Owens. No, he doesn’t condemn her actions. He condemns us—who are condemning her actions. No, I’m not kidding. He summarizes what Candace Owens and her cult are doing as “criticizing and antagonizing” Erika Kirk. No, Michael Knowles. That’s not what’s going on. Candace is slandering Erika Kirk—of conspiring to murder her husband and the father of her children, Charlie Kirk. She is also accusing her of sexually grooming minors—both with zero evidence whatsoever. That is not merely “criticizing” and “antagonizing” Erika Kirk. That is one of the most wicked things you can accuse someone of baselessly. It's also interesting that you say we're obsessed with spending our time defending Erika Kirk yet you don't mention how obsessed Candace is in trying to destroy Erika and TPUSA? The fact that you are more concerned with that and the way we are critiquing Candace rather than what she is doing is very revealing of yourself. Michael Knowles

Jordan S90

34,072 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

So Arty Trolls was watching this video with Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens when suddenly, it stopped midway and was privated. He was watching it on Candace Owens channel. I wonder why? In this clip, Candace asks: “Charlie Kirk, did you ever date Candace Owens?” Charlie responds jokingly with, “not in real life.” Because there was supposed speculation about their friendship. Charlie then goes on to say that Candace is engaged. The producer asks Charlie, “do you date?” Charlie shares that he’s in a relationship and unavailable. Candace then goes on to say this about Erika Kirk, “I will say this, Charlie dates, Charlie has a girlfriend, I ABSOLUTELY LOVE HER, I ADORE her… she really is a wonderful human being.” Interesting. We might as well keep clipping away because she wants to hide this video for whatever reason. Full link below.

So Arty Trolls was watching this video with Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens when suddenly, it stopped midway and was privated. He was watching it on Candace Owens channel. I wonder why? In this clip, Candace asks: “Charlie Kirk, did you ever date Candace Owens?” Charlie responds jokingly with, “not in real life.” Because there was supposed speculation about their friendship. Charlie then goes on to say that Candace is engaged. The producer asks Charlie, “do you date?” Charlie shares that he’s in a relationship and unavailable. Candace then goes on to say this about Erika Kirk, “I will say this, Charlie dates, Charlie has a girlfriend, I ABSOLUTELY LOVE HER, I ADORE her… she really is a wonderful human being.” Interesting. We might as well keep clipping away because she wants to hide this video for whatever reason. Full link below.

Shady

322,670 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Michael Knowles responds to Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate‼️ Andrew suggested that Michael could be a moderator and Candace accepted. However neither party had previously checked with Michael to see if he would do it. He says he thinks the case against Tyler Robinson should be debated in the actual courtroom and not in the court of public opinion. But he says he’s still thinking about doing it though and wants to hear from people with strong opinions over whether or not he should. SO LET’S HEAR IT 👂 You have strong opinions. I don’t care if you’re a Candace Owens fan or an Andrew Wilson fan. DO YOU THINK MICHAEL KNOWLES SHOULD MODERATE THIS DEBATE⁉️ Personally I have no real preferences over who moderates and I’m sure Michael Knowles could do a good job. I just know that a moderator (a much better one than Sneako) is most definitely needed in this debate or else Candace will immediately go off the rails.

Michael Knowles responds to Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate‼️ Andrew suggested that Michael could be a moderator and Candace accepted. However neither party had previously checked with Michael to see if he would do it. He says he thinks the case against Tyler Robinson should be debated in the actual courtroom and not in the court of public opinion. But he says he’s still thinking about doing it though and wants to hear from people with strong opinions over whether or not he should. SO LET’S HEAR IT 👂 You have strong opinions. I don’t care if you’re a Candace Owens fan or an Andrew Wilson fan. DO YOU THINK MICHAEL KNOWLES SHOULD MODERATE THIS DEBATE⁉️ Personally I have no real preferences over who moderates and I’m sure Michael Knowles could do a good job. I just know that a moderator (a much better one than Sneako) is most definitely needed in this debate or else Candace will immediately go off the rails.

Cinema Shogun

96,063 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Chris Brunet: I have very simple question for Shabbos, who is Amalek? Shabbos Kestenbaum: Who is what? Who is Amalek? Oh, Amalek? Chris Brunet: Yeah, and do you believe they should be destroyed? Who are they, and do you believe they should be destroyed? Shabbos Kestenbaum: I... I mean, I’m happy to have a Jewish theological debate, but I don’t want to be rude, I’m not sure how much Hebrew you know, but most of them [classic religious texts] believe that Amalek is more of a concept in the age of Golus. Chris Brunet: Are they people today? Shabbos Kestenbaum: No Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.: According to Netanyahu, they are, in fact, he referred to the Palestinian people… Shabbos Kestenbaum: Hang on, hang on, you don’t speak Hebrew so you wouldn’t know, I speak Hebrew, you can listen to the video yourself, [Netanyahu] clearly says… Michael Rectenwald: Watch the video yourself, he said, we should treat [Palestinians] like we treat [Amalek] in the bible, which is to destroy all men, women. Shabbos Kestenbaum: First of all, I’m going to give you all a Hebrew lesson, it’s not Amalek, it’s Amalek, all right, that’s first of all, second of all, you just sound stupid when you say it like that, the second way, the same way you said that there’s a Golan brigade, there’s no Golan brigade, it’s called Golan. So it’ll just make it sound smarter. The second thing is when [Netanyahu] said that, he said that Hamas is the equivalent of Amalek, which sure if that’s your theological political justification go for it. But again, I don’t know how much of a theological debate you want to have, but almost all the [classic religious texts] certainly in the Gemara as well say that Amalek in the age of Golus is not a practical people. Chris Brunet: So when every Israeli politician says that Amalek must be murdered and destroyed, who are they talking about? Shabbos Kestenbaum: Well, as I just said, when [Netanyahu] refers to Hamas, he’s comparing them to the Amalek nation in the Bible, but the thing is that... Michael Rectenwald: The bible says, and I do know the Bible in this regard, it says the Amalek should be utterly destroyed, man, woman, child, and all the animals, wipe them out, so that’s not just Hamas, that’s all the Palestinians, that’s what he was referring to, and not only that, other Israeli officials called for total extermination. This is not a moral people. This is not a moral nation. This nation is barbaric.

Chris Brunet: I have very simple question for Shabbos, who is Amalek? Shabbos Kestenbaum: Who is what? Who is Amalek? Oh, Amalek? Chris Brunet: Yeah, and do you believe they should be destroyed? Who are they, and do you believe they should be destroyed? Shabbos Kestenbaum: I... I mean, I’m happy to have a Jewish theological debate, but I don’t want to be rude, I’m not sure how much Hebrew you know, but most of them [classic religious texts] believe that Amalek is more of a concept in the age of Golus. Chris Brunet: Are they people today? Shabbos Kestenbaum: No Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.: According to Netanyahu, they are, in fact, he referred to the Palestinian people… Shabbos Kestenbaum: Hang on, hang on, you don’t speak Hebrew so you wouldn’t know, I speak Hebrew, you can listen to the video yourself, [Netanyahu] clearly says… Michael Rectenwald: Watch the video yourself, he said, we should treat [Palestinians] like we treat [Amalek] in the bible, which is to destroy all men, women. Shabbos Kestenbaum: First of all, I’m going to give you all a Hebrew lesson, it’s not Amalek, it’s Amalek, all right, that’s first of all, second of all, you just sound stupid when you say it like that, the second way, the same way you said that there’s a Golan brigade, there’s no Golan brigade, it’s called Golan. So it’ll just make it sound smarter. The second thing is when [Netanyahu] said that, he said that Hamas is the equivalent of Amalek, which sure if that’s your theological political justification go for it. But again, I don’t know how much of a theological debate you want to have, but almost all the [classic religious texts] certainly in the Gemara as well say that Amalek in the age of Golus is not a practical people. Chris Brunet: So when every Israeli politician says that Amalek must be murdered and destroyed, who are they talking about? Shabbos Kestenbaum: Well, as I just said, when [Netanyahu] refers to Hamas, he’s comparing them to the Amalek nation in the Bible, but the thing is that... Michael Rectenwald: The bible says, and I do know the Bible in this regard, it says the Amalek should be utterly destroyed, man, woman, child, and all the animals, wipe them out, so that’s not just Hamas, that’s all the Palestinians, that’s what he was referring to, and not only that, other Israeli officials called for total extermination. This is not a moral people. This is not a moral nation. This nation is barbaric.

Chris Brunet

328,056 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Candace to Erika: “you just got lucky and there Charlie was at the airport in Israel. And you saw him. And your mom said ‘go up to him.’ Because your mom’s a pusher. I always thought it was so strange how you never mentioned that I was at the airport with Charlie. You never said, ‘I saw Charlie with Candace.’ Because we were actually together on that trip.” Ok I’ve never been more convinced this woman was in love with Charlie. I can assure you that if another woman met the man she was going to marry while that man was on a business trip with me, and then proceeded to cut me out of their meeting story, I would feel absolutely nothing. This isn’t a thing women care about. Unless they’re in love. The fact that Charlie was on a platonic trip with Candace when Erika met him is irrelevant to both Charlie and Erika. What matters is that they met and fell in love and married. Everyone around becomes tertiary—especially when that person didn’t set you guys up or anything.

Candace to Erika: “you just got lucky and there Charlie was at the airport in Israel. And you saw him. And your mom said ‘go up to him.’ Because your mom’s a pusher. I always thought it was so strange how you never mentioned that I was at the airport with Charlie. You never said, ‘I saw Charlie with Candace.’ Because we were actually together on that trip.” Ok I’ve never been more convinced this woman was in love with Charlie. I can assure you that if another woman met the man she was going to marry while that man was on a business trip with me, and then proceeded to cut me out of their meeting story, I would feel absolutely nothing. This isn’t a thing women care about. Unless they’re in love. The fact that Charlie was on a platonic trip with Candace when Erika met him is irrelevant to both Charlie and Erika. What matters is that they met and fell in love and married. Everyone around becomes tertiary—especially when that person didn’t set you guys up or anything.

Natalie Jean Beisner

1,865,118 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Candace Owens friend Michael Knowles has declined to moderate her debate with Andrew Wilson‼️ I agree with some of the points he made during his 7 minute monologue of excuses. BUT HERE’S WHERE I HAVE A PROBLEM. Michael Knowles slickly tries to compare the people calling out and debunking Candace Owens to Candace herself and the disgusting network that she has formed to harass Charlie’s friends and family. He’s basically saying that people who take a stand against her are just as much of the problem as she is. And this isn’t the first time he’s said something like this. I would prefer for him to just be honest and say what he really means…. Which is that he doesn’t want Candace to call him a homosexual mossad agent and then smear all of his personal business all over the internet. Because we all know that’s the real reason why he doesn’t want to talk about any of this.

Candace Owens friend Michael Knowles has declined to moderate her debate with Andrew Wilson‼️ I agree with some of the points he made during his 7 minute monologue of excuses. BUT HERE’S WHERE I HAVE A PROBLEM. Michael Knowles slickly tries to compare the people calling out and debunking Candace Owens to Candace herself and the disgusting network that she has formed to harass Charlie’s friends and family. He’s basically saying that people who take a stand against her are just as much of the problem as she is. And this isn’t the first time he’s said something like this. I would prefer for him to just be honest and say what he really means…. Which is that he doesn’t want Candace to call him a homosexual mossad agent and then smear all of his personal business all over the internet. Because we all know that’s the real reason why he doesn’t want to talk about any of this.

Cinema Shogun

81,369 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

I have tremendous respect for Michael Knowles. But those of us with platforms are obligated to call out evil. The attacks on Erika Kirk by Candace Owens are evil, and directly violate biblical law. If we conservatives can't say that, then there is no Conservatism.

I have tremendous respect for Michael Knowles. But those of us with platforms are obligated to call out evil. The attacks on Erika Kirk by Candace Owens are evil, and directly violate biblical law. If we conservatives can't say that, then there is no Conservatism.

Shabbos Kestenbaum

103,537 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"Michael used to come see us a lot. He was a big big fan, especially of Freddie, and Freddie and Michael got on real real well. Michael was very impressed with our lighting rig, I remember. I can’t remember which tour it was. We had pods of lights that moved above the stage that had pilots in them. He said, 'I’m stealing that,' and sure enough on the 'Victory' tour they had something very similar. But Michael really was very fond of Freddie and sort’ve idolized him. Michael really felt he wanted to be a rock star." - Dr. Brian May #MichaelJackson #FreddieMercury

"Michael used to come see us a lot. He was a big big fan, especially of Freddie, and Freddie and Michael got on real real well. Michael was very impressed with our lighting rig, I remember. I can’t remember which tour it was. We had pods of lights that moved above the stage that had pilots in them. He said, 'I’m stealing that,' and sure enough on the 'Victory' tour they had something very similar. But Michael really was very fond of Freddie and sort’ve idolized him. Michael really felt he wanted to be a rock star." - Dr. Brian May #MichaelJackson #FreddieMercury

ふLady

36,042 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Ben Shapiro to Megyn Kelly: “This is why, you know, I think you and I differ on our angle with regard to, for example, Candace Owens. I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now, OK? And I say that, again—” Megyn Kelly: “I didn’t opine on whether it’s evil or not. But my position is: it’s really none of my business and—” Ben Shapiro: “Why is it-, but I have a question: why is it none of your business? I mean, you comment on these things for a living.” Megyn Kelly: “I’m not mother of the internet.” Ben Shapiro: “No, but if this were on the left and somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having mu*dered him, I assume that you would be talking about it.”

Ben Shapiro to Megyn Kelly: “This is why, you know, I think you and I differ on our angle with regard to, for example, Candace Owens. I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now, OK? And I say that, again—” Megyn Kelly: “I didn’t opine on whether it’s evil or not. But my position is: it’s really none of my business and—” Ben Shapiro: “Why is it-, but I have a question: why is it none of your business? I mean, you comment on these things for a living.” Megyn Kelly: “I’m not mother of the internet.” Ben Shapiro: “No, but if this were on the left and somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having mu*dered him, I assume that you would be talking about it.”

RedWave Press

2,134,659 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Justin Gaethje and Michael Bisping could relate to each other’s losses 😅 Justin: "I didn’t get subbed by Oliveira because of his jiu-jitsu; I got dropped, and then he took my back." Michael: "I totally get it. When I fought GSP, it was the punch that he hit me with. I didn’t know where I was, and the next minute he’s on my back, choking." (Via michael )

Justin Gaethje and Michael Bisping could relate to each other’s losses 😅 Justin: "I didn’t get subbed by Oliveira because of his jiu-jitsu; I got dropped, and then he took my back." Michael: "I totally get it. When I fought GSP, it was the punch that he hit me with. I didn’t know where I was, and the next minute he’s on my back, choking." (Via michael )

Red Corner MMA

216,532 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Candace Owens explains why Erika Kirk’s 100% certainty that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk made her question whether Erika was somehow complicit. Candace Owens: "How could you sit up there and say, yes I 100% believe Tyler Robinson did it? That right there is why it is impossible for me to think that Erika Kirk is not complicit somehow." Andrew Wilson: "How would it be the case that even if Erika Kirk did believe that Tyler Robinson was 100% responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk, that somehow she's complicit?" Candace Owens: "When I sat down with [Erika] and I was expecting for her to say, well, you know, I'm obviously the victim on the case and we got to see the shot, you know, taken or this or that or whatever, but when I sat down with her, it was nothing, it was nothing."

Candace Owens explains why Erika Kirk’s 100% certainty that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk made her question whether Erika was somehow complicit. Candace Owens: "How could you sit up there and say, yes I 100% believe Tyler Robinson did it? That right there is why it is impossible for me to think that Erika Kirk is not complicit somehow." Andrew Wilson: "How would it be the case that even if Erika Kirk did believe that Tyler Robinson was 100% responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk, that somehow she's complicit?" Candace Owens: "When I sat down with [Erika] and I was expecting for her to say, well, you know, I'm obviously the victim on the case and we got to see the shot, you know, taken or this or that or whatever, but when I sat down with her, it was nothing, it was nothing."

PBD Podcast

251,913 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Today Candace shared more old private text messages from Charlie—including one where Charlie allegedly texted Candace that Ben “views you as my slave.” Candace says: “It is just a fact that Ben Shapiro did a lot of things behind the scenes to stop the rise of Charlie Kirk.” Two things on this: number 1–I’m asking again why Candace went on to work for Ben Shapiro? If Charlie was her BFF, and Ben tried to not only pull Charlie away from her but also tried to thwart Charlie’s success, why did Candace go on to work for Ben for years? What kind of loyalty is that to your BFF? Did Candace just want the money and fame it brought? Was there some subsequent reconciliation between all three that Candace is conveniently leaving out, or is she just a really crappy friend? And number 2—what does this have to do with who murdered Charlie? It has NOTHING to do with it. It’s petty drama and gossip. It’s not what Charlie would’ve engaged in publicly or wanted. If Candace actually was sincere in this “investigation,” she’d be sidetracked by nothing and ignoring anything that doesn’t bring her closer to “the truth.” And if she were a Christian, she’d be turning the other cheek.

Today Candace shared more old private text messages from Charlie—including one where Charlie allegedly texted Candace that Ben “views you as my slave.” Candace says: “It is just a fact that Ben Shapiro did a lot of things behind the scenes to stop the rise of Charlie Kirk.” Two things on this: number 1–I’m asking again why Candace went on to work for Ben Shapiro? If Charlie was her BFF, and Ben tried to not only pull Charlie away from her but also tried to thwart Charlie’s success, why did Candace go on to work for Ben for years? What kind of loyalty is that to your BFF? Did Candace just want the money and fame it brought? Was there some subsequent reconciliation between all three that Candace is conveniently leaving out, or is she just a really crappy friend? And number 2—what does this have to do with who murdered Charlie? It has NOTHING to do with it. It’s petty drama and gossip. It’s not what Charlie would’ve engaged in publicly or wanted. If Candace actually was sincere in this “investigation,” she’d be sidetracked by nothing and ignoring anything that doesn’t bring her closer to “the truth.” And if she were a Christian, she’d be turning the other cheek.

Natalie Jean Beisner

76,805 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

This episode of Friendly Fire is no joke 👀🔥 Ben Shapiro: "Michael, I'll just ask you straight up. Is Candace Owens doing something evil by attacking Erika Kirk?" Michael Knowles: "I think that it's wrong to attack Erika Kirk." BS: "Say the sentence with her name in it." MK: "I'm not going to dance like a puppet for the podcast wars."

This episode of Friendly Fire is no joke 👀🔥 Ben Shapiro: "Michael, I'll just ask you straight up. Is Candace Owens doing something evil by attacking Erika Kirk?" Michael Knowles: "I think that it's wrong to attack Erika Kirk." BS: "Say the sentence with her name in it." MK: "I'm not going to dance like a puppet for the podcast wars."

Daily Wire

2,816,811 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Candace Owens with a FREUDIAN SLIP - gives the GAME AWAY - why she's ACTUALLY ATTACKING Erika Kirk. She meant to say that Erika betrayed Charlie - but instead said, “Erika appears to be doing that to ME.” Incredible when you think about it: Candace found NOTHING suspicious about Erika Kirk - until Erika told her to STOP. Then the FLIP SWITCHES. Shortly after Candace met with Erika, Turning Point USA had Ben Shapiro open AmericaFest, where he made a fool of Candace and called her out. That appears to have deeply triggered her - and may have contributed to her escalating unhinged attacks on Erika.

Candace Owens with a FREUDIAN SLIP - gives the GAME AWAY - why she's ACTUALLY ATTACKING Erika Kirk. She meant to say that Erika betrayed Charlie - but instead said, “Erika appears to be doing that to ME.” Incredible when you think about it: Candace found NOTHING suspicious about Erika Kirk - until Erika told her to STOP. Then the FLIP SWITCHES. Shortly after Candace met with Erika, Turning Point USA had Ben Shapiro open AmericaFest, where he made a fool of Candace and called her out. That appears to have deeply triggered her - and may have contributed to her escalating unhinged attacks on Erika.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

114,745 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Piers Morgan: “Is [Erika Kirk] okay with you now continuing to talk about your theories or does she still want you to stop?” Candace Owens: “Well, she didn’t ask me to stop… Then we had a conversation and I was not asked throughout that conversation to stop.” Piers Morgan: “You will carry on with the theories?” Candace Owens: “Yes, until I feel confident in who kiIIed Charlie Kirk I will not stop investigating this.” Candace is a self-centered and evil woman.

Piers Morgan: “Is [Erika Kirk] okay with you now continuing to talk about your theories or does she still want you to stop?” Candace Owens: “Well, she didn’t ask me to stop… Then we had a conversation and I was not asked throughout that conversation to stop.” Piers Morgan: “You will carry on with the theories?” Candace Owens: “Yes, until I feel confident in who kiIIed Charlie Kirk I will not stop investigating this.” Candace is a self-centered and evil woman.

RedWave Press

290,345 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

I think Candace is confused. Charlie met Erika on and started dating in Sept 2018. and had taken her to Hawaii that same month. Candace didn’t meet George until “Dec 2018”. I believe they meet before but let’s go with her timeline. So Erika and Charlie were dating before you even met George. Didn’t you already have a boyfriend and you left him for George? Ryan, remember Ryan? “Wing woman” you say Candace? He asked you to leave in May. So you and Erika for 5 months that you were there never had a relationship. Weird. You were so close to him that you never went to dinner or out during at least that 5 months? In 7 years You never met their kids? You weren’t invited to the wedding? But you didn’t even have a relationship with his family? Interesting. Candace Baby, the relationship with Charlie wasn’t what you say is it? We’ve been told what really happened. You were upset Erika was now there.

I think Candace is confused. Charlie met Erika on and started dating in Sept 2018. and had taken her to Hawaii that same month. Candace didn’t meet George until “Dec 2018”. I believe they meet before but let’s go with her timeline. So Erika and Charlie were dating before you even met George. Didn’t you already have a boyfriend and you left him for George? Ryan, remember Ryan? “Wing woman” you say Candace? He asked you to leave in May. So you and Erika for 5 months that you were there never had a relationship. Weird. You were so close to him that you never went to dinner or out during at least that 5 months? In 7 years You never met their kids? You weren’t invited to the wedding? But you didn’t even have a relationship with his family? Interesting. Candace Baby, the relationship with Charlie wasn’t what you say is it? We’ve been told what really happened. You were upset Erika was now there.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

69,291 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

A student demands answers from Michael Knowles on why he won’t go after Candace Owens for the “verbal flogging” of his murdered friend’s widow, Erika Kirk. Knowles pushes back and explains why the people screaming about Candace aren’t “doing any good.” STUDENT: “Why have you been so reticent now to talk about the very public verbal flogging of the widow of the man you called your friend by another woman you have previously called your friend... Candace Owens?” “I’m accused of being reticent to talk about it because I don’t want to offend anyone or something.” “I think Erika is a national hero. I think she’s suffered immensely with a great deal of grace and dignity. I obviously totally disagree with Candace on all of that.” “Do you really think you’re going to get Candace… to stop speaking, just by complaining about her all the time? That’s only going to help grow her numbers. That’s exactly what she wants you to do.” “I was assailed for making that observation… but I think I’ve been proven totally right. Nobody took my advice. Everybody did the other strategy, and the problem only got worse.” “I think they’re helping Candace get views. I think they’re helping themselves get views by playing clips of Candace… I don’t think they’re doing any good, actually.” “Sometimes it’s more important to do the right thing than seem like you’re doing the right thing… it’s more important to do good than to feel good.”

A student demands answers from Michael Knowles on why he won’t go after Candace Owens for the “verbal flogging” of his murdered friend’s widow, Erika Kirk. Knowles pushes back and explains why the people screaming about Candace aren’t “doing any good.” STUDENT: “Why have you been so reticent now to talk about the very public verbal flogging of the widow of the man you called your friend by another woman you have previously called your friend... Candace Owens?” “I’m accused of being reticent to talk about it because I don’t want to offend anyone or something.” “I think Erika is a national hero. I think she’s suffered immensely with a great deal of grace and dignity. I obviously totally disagree with Candace on all of that.” “Do you really think you’re going to get Candace… to stop speaking, just by complaining about her all the time? That’s only going to help grow her numbers. That’s exactly what she wants you to do.” “I was assailed for making that observation… but I think I’ve been proven totally right. Nobody took my advice. Everybody did the other strategy, and the problem only got worse.” “I think they’re helping Candace get views. I think they’re helping themselves get views by playing clips of Candace… I don’t think they’re doing any good, actually.” “Sometimes it’s more important to do the right thing than seem like you’re doing the right thing… it’s more important to do good than to feel good.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

443,177 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Kevin Johnson telling a story about guarding Michael Jordan in the finals “So we fly in from Phoenix to Chicago. I fall asleep on the plane and then the head coach wakes me up, right? He says, Hey, I just want to let you know, game three is going to be your game. Said, Cool. You know I believe that I’m going to have a bounce back. He said you are guarding Michael Jordan. And I’m thinking we down 0-2 our best player is getting scorched. Know you going to put me who had a rough two games on Michael Jordan, right? So I go back to sleep. Plane land. I wake up. I’m like, damn I had a nightmare. I thought the coach came and told me I’m guarding Michael Jordan. We walking off the plane. The coach was right there. And I’m like I had this dream you came and woke me up and told me you want me to guard Michael Jordan. He said, you are. God as my witness we get on the team bus we take it from the airport we staying at the hotel downtown. I get off the bus. I tell equipment manager to take my bags. I see a church across the street. I walk straight in that church and sit in the front row and I’m like, Jesus, I don’t believe in you no more. There’s no way if you loved me and died on the cross and did all the things you would be having me guard Michael Jordan” (Via Club520podcast)

Kevin Johnson telling a story about guarding Michael Jordan in the finals “So we fly in from Phoenix to Chicago. I fall asleep on the plane and then the head coach wakes me up, right? He says, Hey, I just want to let you know, game three is going to be your game. Said, Cool. You know I believe that I’m going to have a bounce back. He said you are guarding Michael Jordan. And I’m thinking we down 0-2 our best player is getting scorched. Know you going to put me who had a rough two games on Michael Jordan, right? So I go back to sleep. Plane land. I wake up. I’m like, damn I had a nightmare. I thought the coach came and told me I’m guarding Michael Jordan. We walking off the plane. The coach was right there. And I’m like I had this dream you came and woke me up and told me you want me to guard Michael Jordan. He said, you are. God as my witness we get on the team bus we take it from the airport we staying at the hotel downtown. I get off the bus. I tell equipment manager to take my bags. I see a church across the street. I walk straight in that church and sit in the front row and I’m like, Jesus, I don’t believe in you no more. There’s no way if you loved me and died on the cross and did all the things you would be having me guard Michael Jordan” (Via Club520podcast)

NBA Courtside

561,734 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Chris Tucker says he landed in LA, then immediately told the captain to take the G5 back to New York after Michael Jackson asked to meet the next morning “I flew all the way to New York for something else, and then I called Michael because I wanted to meet Michael too. I’m on this G5 jet, I land, I call Michael, and nobody answered. I leave a message, ‘Michael, I’m in New York, man. I want to meet you.’ Never heard from him” “Finished what I was doing, flew back, took that G5 jet back to LA. Soon as I land, I check my phone and I got a message from Michael Jackson saying, ‘Mr. Jackson wants to meet you tomorrow in New York.’ I said, ‘Oh my God, I just flew back to LA’” “I got up out of my seat and said to the captain, ‘Take me back to New York.’ He said, ‘What?’ I said, ‘Call the office, they got my credit card. Just take me back. I don’t care how much it cost.’ That bill was so high, man, but I didn’t care. I met with Michael that next morning and we became friends”

Chris Tucker says he landed in LA, then immediately told the captain to take the G5 back to New York after Michael Jackson asked to meet the next morning “I flew all the way to New York for something else, and then I called Michael because I wanted to meet Michael too. I’m on this G5 jet, I land, I call Michael, and nobody answered. I leave a message, ‘Michael, I’m in New York, man. I want to meet you.’ Never heard from him” “Finished what I was doing, flew back, took that G5 jet back to LA. Soon as I land, I check my phone and I got a message from Michael Jackson saying, ‘Mr. Jackson wants to meet you tomorrow in New York.’ I said, ‘Oh my God, I just flew back to LA’” “I got up out of my seat and said to the captain, ‘Take me back to New York.’ He said, ‘What?’ I said, ‘Call the office, they got my credit card. Just take me back. I don’t care how much it cost.’ That bill was so high, man, but I didn’t care. I met with Michael that next morning and we became friends”

Yonan

590,703 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce