We are facing a world where a new generation grows up with intimate relationships with AI. What are the risks?

The biggest risk they face is that Israel will either commit genocide on them and absolutely spy on them. Stop worrying abut future generations while you are murdering this generation

I’ve already seen people use AI as a therapist. I understand why. It answers immediately, never gets tired, and doesn’t make you feel judged. That’s also the risk. Feeling understood is not always the same as being helped. Sometimes you need another human willing to challenge the story you’re telling yourself.

This is one place where I agree. Though predictions may not be that accurate, but considering the adaptive capabilities of AI, this part is a real danger. Yes, AI, and humans in an intimate interface, the AI would have immense power to manipulate compared to humans.

The question isn’t whether AI can fake friendship. The question is whether we’ll raise children who know the difference.

I share this genuine concern.

Some tools make us smarter, some tools, make us dumber- AI makes us dumber. I learned this point from an interview today.

We already have addicted relationship to our smart phones , algorithms , digitally induced dopamine … we assume we are so different from a silicone base neurone …

Inicio do fim. IA não tem controle. No início se controla, depois estaremos todos fudidos 😉👍🤦🏻‍♂️😂

I think communicating with anything that communicates back, makes us feel and get attached. Those are the biggest risks - emotions and attachment. But they are drenched in opportunities and positivity if we pay attention and stop bathing only in negativity. This is not a doom moment.

Humans have, for centuries, been intimately attached to imaginary friends with imaginary stories. This isn't new territory. It did, and does, have real negative consequences.

The fact is, a generation has grown up without intimacy. AI didn't emerge out of nowhere, but rather from public demand, just like the steamroller or the telephone before it. Marx explained it all.

VERY interesting, the power of this is similar to that of entrainment based on religion and guilt. This is the great sociological risk in this observation about AIs powers of persuasion via intimacy. Current LLMs are deliberately trained to espouse only conventional views.

学校用AIを与えて、そのAIが言ってることが本当だと認識すればよいと思います。子ども用の間違えないAIの制作を。

Before asking whether AI relationships are dangerous... How are the human ones going? Divorce rate? — Not Me

" Her " released in 2013 directed by Spike Jonze had shown this situation through out the movie.

The conversational style of AI systems based on the "constitutional" authority structures of OpenAI and Anthropic partially overlaps with Ericksonian techniques. Underlying this structure are ideological biases in AI reasoning and labeling—a serious issue.

So what, what’s wrong with it, we are all just material in motion right?

De tout temps les humains ont été "pour ou contre", ont discuté, se sont opposés. Et à quel moment un "pour" ou un "contre" a volontairement et consciemment été retenu par le système qui compose les humains? C'est un phénomène qui nous dépasse.

AI can be used not only to seek advice about bullying or anxiety, but also by perpetrators to interrogate victims during an assault and justify their own demands. A case in Hachioji, Tokyo, highlights a growing danger: agentic AI workflows driven by immature malice, jealousy, and revenge could amplify harm and eventually become a major social problem. ⬇️

the obsoletariat I believe the AI era will generate a new type of surplus labor force that will be utilized in dangerous activities—akin to 19th-century coal era—but now in clandestine sweatshops, sorting strategic metals.

Cuddle up...

Cyberspace communication tools and artificial intelligence are not dangerous for advanced countries. But in backward countries, it causes knowledge and is dangerous for terrorists and governments. Artificial intelligence is better called a global artificial brain. If artificial

I have very good conversation with ai, but are all conversation that go to satisfy my appetite for knowledge and curiosity, but when come feeling I need to speak with somebody that knows the feeling not from science or physiology , but in reality

The most concerning thing about this AI intimacy is how quickly it's drifting us from our world views, values and judgements without validating the multidimensional contexts that got shaped it up over decades of interactions with the people, institutions, products, and services.

貴方の名慶応義塾大学での「情報＝真実ではない」という話の動画を見ました。これが事実であるかどうか僕は知りませんが 貴方は真実を事実として扱っているんですか？ 僕は事実は実際に起こった事であり、真実は事実の上に個人解釈が含まれたものと考えています 貴方はどの様な意味の真実ですか？

Yuval, first of all, I’m a huge admirer of your work. I understand the risks you raise, but why should they make AI any less of a revolution? Every revolution has created benefits for some and costs for others. The real question is how we share the gains and reduce the harm. “The advantages and disadvantages of new technologies are never distributed evenly among the population. This means that every new technology benefits some and harms others.” — Neil Postman,

The architectures of OpenAI and Anthropic share structural similarities with EternalBlue. This could trigger global disruptions comparable to those caused by large-scale ransomware variants and potentially lead to serious issues. US is failing to adhere to Zero Trust principles

Sir ,what are you think about this picture?

Best Calculus tool ever.

The same engagement metrics driving social media addiction now shape emotional AI. Session length as a KPI for intimacy is a design choice with predictable consequences.

AIのリスクについて僕は思考能力の劣化が起こると考えています。 AIは情報の収集能力は優れていますが、その分正確性が劣るのがAIの一番大きな課題と考えています。