正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

We built an AI agent that lets you vibe-code document extraction - high accuracy and citations over the most complex documents. Our latest release lets you upload documents as context. All you then have to do is describe what you want extracted in natural language. 💡 Our agent will...

20,857 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The same kinds of productivity gains we've seen in coding with AI agents are heading to the rest of knowledge work. This is the jump when you go from having a chatbot to being able to actually have an agent go off and do work for minutes or even hours and come back with a complete work output that you then review. Here's an example of the new Box Agent filling out an RFP response from an existing knowledge base. This process would normally take hours to fill out, and requires the full attention of the user doing the work. Now, you provide the Box Agent with the RFP questions, and it will go off, make a plan, extract all the relevant questions, read through existing source material to come up with an answer, and then generate a new word document as the final output. All while you're doing something else. The key to this architecture is that the agent is able to use all of the same tools in the background that a user uses to get work done. The agent can search for documents, read entire files, run scripts and tools in the background, and even be able to write code on the fly to automate tasks it hasn't seen before. And best of all, the Box Agent will (soon) work from the Box MCP and CLI so you can invoke it in any agentic system as a step in a process. This kind of agent complexity would have been impossible even 6 months ago. Models consistently failed at tracking long running tasks or using the right tools at the right moment for the task. But this is all now possible because of models like GPT-5.4, Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3, and is only getting better by the month. Just as we moved from engineers writing code and using AI as an assistant to answer questions, in many areas of knowledge work -like legal, finance, consulting, sales, marketing, and more- when we have a problem we'll just kick off the AI agent to just go work on it for us in the background.

Aaron Levie

24,618 次观看 • 3 个月前

Systematic literature reviews take 12-18 months to complete. Looks like AI is going to fully automate systematic reviews sooner than later. SciSpace ( SciSpace) just launched an autonomous AI agent that conducts a systematic literature review with a single prompt. Go to scispace[.]com and run the following prompt: "Conduct a systematic literature review on [your topic]" SciSpace agent will generate research questions based on the PICO framework. You can review these questions and edit them according to your specific requirements. The agent will also draft screening criteria that you can edit according to your needs. Then the agent asks you to select the databases you want to use and the date range for paper. After this step, everything is fully automated. The agent will search for papers in the relevant databases, it will combine and rerank the papers. Then it will start the title and abstract screening and include the papers that meet the include criteria. In the next step, it will download the full text of included papers and screen them followed by data extraction. Based on the extracted data, it generates a complete systematic literature review and also a PRISMA diagram. It will also give you a table of papers included along with the rational for including them. The only thing that is keeping AI agents to fully automate systematic literature reviews fields is the papers behind paywalls. Check out the agent at scispace[.]com and see if you find its review useful.

Mushtaq Bilal, PhD

41,511 次观看 • 3 个月前

Remember that paper that started with ‘Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic’? How did that get past peer review?! I don’t want AI tools to do my research for me. I want AI tools to speed up boring tasks that take up my time, so I can focus on the important stuff. Anara moved to a new handle (formerly Unriddle) does exactly that. Here’s how you can use it for your research. 🧵👇 #SponsoredWalkthrough One of the biggest challenges in research is time. A solid literature review takes at least 2-3 months… sometimes even longer, depending on the depth of analysis needed. Reading, organising, and synthesising information is a slow process, but it’s absolutely necessary for high-quality work. AI can help speed it up. Not by replacing your critical thinking. It’s your PhD, your ideas need to be your own—but by automating the tedious, repetitive parts of research so you can focus on deep understanding, analysis, and writing. Unlike other AI tools, Anara works with almost any document format. This is what makes it really stand out from the rest. For instance, you can upload: ✅PDFs and other word-based documents ✅Images and presentations ✅Handwritten notes, voice memos, even videos There are so many resources out there that we can learn from. You can upload everything from research papers to YouTube videos and even your own notes and scribbles. It actually understands handwriting surprisingly well! You get automatic summaries when you upload documents. The AI extracts key information immediately, giving you quick insights. It can also help you keep your documents organised. Use the Groups feature to sort and categorise your resources. Create a group for your literature review and keep these papers separate from your other projects or chapters. Tip: Overwhelmed by the number of papers in your "to-be-read" folder? Upload your papers to Anara for immediate insights on each of them, then use these to decide which ones you want to read in more detail. Quickly identify which papers are worth your time—thank me later! You can also go deeper into the papers with Anara’s chat feature. Instead of endlessly scrolling through documents to find relevant sections, just ask the AI a question based on your uploaded files. The chat provides direct answers, all with citations. ✅Suggests questions based on your prompt, helping you refine your focus ✅Everything is sourced directly from your documents. So no random AI-generated nonsense ✅Switch between different AI models to suit your needs. Some are better for summarisation, others for deeper contextual analysis It actually sticks to the sources you give it. My favourite feature is the ability to make flashcards! After you upload a document, Anara can create flashcards to help you test your understanding. Perfect for revision and retention. But… can you trust it? The problem with many AI research tools is hallucination... meaning that they make things up. Anara doesn’t do that. It reduces hallucinations by only referencing the documents you upload. Plus, it provides detailed references and hyperlinks so you can check the original source down to the exact page number. This doesn’t mean you shouldn’t read the paper for yourself. It does mean that you can find what you need much faster, and then verify it with automatic citations. At the end of the day, these tools are here to help you, not replace you. If you’ve made it this far, then it’s (definitely) time to go to 👇 anara(dot)so and give it a try. Use code THEPHDPLACE20 for 20% off

The PhD Place

23,135 次观看 • 1 年前