Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

We don’t have a falling birth rate problem. We have a problem with incentivizing the wrong births with our policies. It’s fixable: free contraception, free abortions, but no added welfare, food or housing benefits for having more children.

16,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

24 Kommentare

Profilbild von Rebecca V Anti-Communist
Rebecca V Anti-Communistvor 1 Jahr

The reality is birth rates are dropping because we do not need an astronomical amount of people anymore with modern technology. It’s time to focus on quality of people rather than quantity. And it is much more difficult to encourage quality people to have children. Hard truth!

Profilbild von CNY Fertility
CNY Fertilityvor 1 Jahr

CNY Fertility offers top-quality fertility care for a fraction of the price. Learn why thousands choose CNY Fertility every year for their IVF and family-building needs. With over 30,000 lives created since 1997, your family starts here.

Profilbild von خليل إبراهيم
خليل إبراهيمvor 1 Jahr

Arguing that underclass blacks shouldn’t be encouraged to reproduce, doesn’t change the fact that their total TFR is nearly identical to whites, and that every group in America(including Hispanics) is below replacement level, except for “native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander.”

Profilbild von matelund dunlap
matelund dunlapvor 1 Jahr

Who would be incentivized to just have a child because of $5,000? Like that would be the reason to conceive. Oh and Wingstop.

Profilbild von Tommy Chong Duk
Tommy Chong Dukvor 1 Jahr

I didn't used to be so jaded, but I too am coming to the position that these incentives are all fucked up. I never bitched to you about it but that special ed kid I helped. His mother ended up squeezing out a third one. Which in my mind was a detriment to the two she...

Profilbild von LucasD
LucasDvor 1 Jahr

How about if a professional woman has a child, the government will pay here the average of her past 5 years of reported income, and pay that same amount for 5 years so she can stay at home, until child goes to school. And If she continues to work, pay her 50% of that value.

Profilbild von Bear Man
Bear Manvor 1 Jahr

Shut up bitch.

Profilbild von Napoleon The Fiddler
Napoleon The Fiddlervor 1 Jahr

This was tried, when WASPs, who used to have like 10 kids a pair for literal centuries, starting having 3-4 kids at the turn of the 20th century. Well that was a problem for them because blacks and Catholics didn’t stop having kids like they did. So then they had a genius idea and created planned parenthood, as per the stated goals of the abortion program according to Margret Sanger. Stopping blacks from reproducing as much. Except all that happened was that now with abortion, instead of WASPs having 3 kids, then they starting having 1-2 and aborting the other. And instead of blacks having 7 kids they had 5. It doesn’t take a mathematician… So the entire premise is self defeating, if you’re so desperate that you believe you have to genocide the children of your enemies or else you will die out, then the die is already cast, you’ve lost. Just have more babies and by default you’ll be the winning demographic.

Profilbild von BruceLeeVegas69
BruceLeeVegas69vor 1 Jahr

offer anyone <=85IQ to get sterilized. Sliding scale to most retarded get more money.

Profilbild von DefundTheABC
DefundTheABCvor 1 Jahr

Or sterilisation for a one year subscription card to KFC🍗

Profilbild von Abbie
Abbievor 1 Jahr

And, speaking of kids, here is today's "Quelle Surprise" revelation by @kanyewest: Remember everyone, this man has at least FOUR known kids. (Cringe-de-la-CRINGE!)

Profilbild von Voice of Reason
Voice of Reasonvor 1 Jahr

Poor people should seriously consider having less kids, having less offspring means you can utilize the limited resources you have more effectively. As someone who grew up in the slums, it was filled with broken homes and souls heades by single mother households.

Profilbild von The California Rifleman
The California Riflemanvor 1 Jahr

That, and mandatory removal of custody from parents who cannot provide for their children. When children are raised by bad parents and in bad homes, society has a moral obligation to intervene. Failing to do so is a form of child neglect.

Profilbild von Alberta-Leonidas
Alberta-Leonidasvor 1 Jahr

correct we should not be taxing the producers, and rewarding the takers, it should be reversed

Profilbild von fag free zone
fag free zonevor 1 Jahr

tubes tied and vasectomy to all blacks and the problem is solved

Profilbild von Erick Vivas
Erick Vivasvor 1 Jahr

Guess who is going to start having babies? Those who need the $5000, and then guess what? Is not enough to raise a kid.

Profilbild von Michelangelo
Michelangelovor 1 Jahr

Watch all the Ratchet hoodrats line up for their $5k trumbux per child now...

Profilbild von paultheass
paultheassvor 1 Jahr

They don't need incentivization to have kids, they already have desire to have them. You don't. As such, they beat you in your own game.

Profilbild von 🇲🇽 Brandon Sepulveda
🇲🇽 Brandon Sepulvedavor 1 Jahr

Making the cost of having children more expensive will definitely reverse declining births rates and increase the number of workers per social security beneficiary 😎

Profilbild von NoblePariah
NoblePariahvor 1 Jahr

sounds a lot like you are explaining the merit of eugenics

Profilbild von KBB (Discussed on Red Scare)
KBB (Discussed on Red Scare)vor 1 Jahr

Based

Profilbild von LucasD
LucasDvor 1 Jahr

It's possible to focus incentives for higher human capital... have increasing tax breaks based on number of kids as income increases for middle/high. Even moreso for married, joint tax filers.

Profilbild von Mickeyblueyes58
Mickeyblueyes58vor 1 Jahr

Wrong births, apropos of a global concern

Profilbild von So much losing
So much losingvor 1 Jahr

WTAF? "Wrong births"? Are you Hitler's incarnate?

Ähnliche Videos