Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

We don’t have a falling birth rate problem. We have a problem with incentivizing the wrong births with our policies. It’s fixable: free contraception, free abortions, but no added welfare, food or housing benefits for having more children.

16,382 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 24

Фото профиля Rebecca V Anti-Communist
Rebecca V Anti-Communist1 год назад

The reality is birth rates are dropping because we do not need an astronomical amount of people anymore with modern technology. It’s time to focus on quality of people rather than quantity. And it is much more difficult to encourage quality people to have children. Hard truth!

Фото профиля CNY Fertility
CNY Fertility1 год назад

CNY Fertility offers top-quality fertility care for a fraction of the price. Learn why thousands choose CNY Fertility every year for their IVF and family-building needs. With over 30,000 lives created since 1997, your family starts here.

Фото профиля خليل إبراهيم
خليل إبراهيم1 год назад

Arguing that underclass blacks shouldn’t be encouraged to reproduce, doesn’t change the fact that their total TFR is nearly identical to whites, and that every group in America(including Hispanics) is below replacement level, except for “native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander.”

Фото профиля matelund dunlap
matelund dunlap1 год назад

Who would be incentivized to just have a child because of $5,000? Like that would be the reason to conceive. Oh and Wingstop.

Фото профиля Tommy Chong Duk
Tommy Chong Duk1 год назад

I didn't used to be so jaded, but I too am coming to the position that these incentives are all fucked up. I never bitched to you about it but that special ed kid I helped. His mother ended up squeezing out a third one. Which in my mind was a detriment to the two she...

Фото профиля LucasD
LucasD1 год назад

How about if a professional woman has a child, the government will pay here the average of her past 5 years of reported income, and pay that same amount for 5 years so she can stay at home, until child goes to school. And If she continues to work, pay her 50% of that value.

Фото профиля Bear Man
Bear Man1 год назад

Shut up bitch.

Фото профиля Napoleon The Fiddler
Napoleon The Fiddler1 год назад

This was tried, when WASPs, who used to have like 10 kids a pair for literal centuries, starting having 3-4 kids at the turn of the 20th century. Well that was a problem for them because blacks and Catholics didn’t stop having kids like they did. So then they had a genius idea and created planned parenthood, as per the stated goals of the abortion program according to Margret Sanger. Stopping blacks from reproducing as much. Except all that happened was that now with abortion, instead of WASPs having 3 kids, then they starting having 1-2 and aborting the other. And instead of blacks having 7 kids they had 5. It doesn’t take a mathematician… So the entire premise is self defeating, if you’re so desperate that you believe you have to genocide the children of your enemies or else you will die out, then the die is already cast, you’ve lost. Just have more babies and by default you’ll be the winning demographic.

Фото профиля BruceLeeVegas69
BruceLeeVegas691 год назад

offer anyone <=85IQ to get sterilized. Sliding scale to most retarded get more money.

Фото профиля DefundTheABC
DefundTheABC1 год назад

Or sterilisation for a one year subscription card to KFC🍗

Фото профиля Abbie
Abbie1 год назад

And, speaking of kids, here is today's "Quelle Surprise" revelation by @kanyewest: Remember everyone, this man has at least FOUR known kids. (Cringe-de-la-CRINGE!)

Фото профиля Voice of Reason
Voice of Reason1 год назад

Poor people should seriously consider having less kids, having less offspring means you can utilize the limited resources you have more effectively. As someone who grew up in the slums, it was filled with broken homes and souls heades by single mother households.

Фото профиля The California Rifleman
The California Rifleman1 год назад

That, and mandatory removal of custody from parents who cannot provide for their children. When children are raised by bad parents and in bad homes, society has a moral obligation to intervene. Failing to do so is a form of child neglect.

Фото профиля Alberta-Leonidas
Alberta-Leonidas1 год назад

correct we should not be taxing the producers, and rewarding the takers, it should be reversed

Фото профиля fag free zone
fag free zone1 год назад

tubes tied and vasectomy to all blacks and the problem is solved

Фото профиля Erick Vivas
Erick Vivas1 год назад

Guess who is going to start having babies? Those who need the $5000, and then guess what? Is not enough to raise a kid.

Фото профиля Michelangelo
Michelangelo1 год назад

Watch all the Ratchet hoodrats line up for their $5k trumbux per child now...

Фото профиля paultheass
paultheass1 год назад

They don't need incentivization to have kids, they already have desire to have them. You don't. As such, they beat you in your own game.

Фото профиля 🇲🇽 Brandon Sepulveda
🇲🇽 Brandon Sepulveda1 год назад

Making the cost of having children more expensive will definitely reverse declining births rates and increase the number of workers per social security beneficiary 😎

Фото профиля NoblePariah
NoblePariah1 год назад

sounds a lot like you are explaining the merit of eugenics

Фото профиля KBB (Discussed on Red Scare)
KBB (Discussed on Red Scare)1 год назад

Based

Фото профиля LucasD
LucasD1 год назад

It's possible to focus incentives for higher human capital... have increasing tax breaks based on number of kids as income increases for middle/high. Even moreso for married, joint tax filers.

Фото профиля Mickeyblueyes58
Mickeyblueyes581 год назад

Wrong births, apropos of a global concern

Фото профиля So much losing
So much losing1 год назад

WTAF? "Wrong births"? Are you Hitler's incarnate?

Похожие видео