正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

We don’t have a falling birth rate problem. We have a problem with incentivizing the wrong births with our policies. It’s fixable: free contraception, free abortions, but no added welfare, food or housing benefits for having more children.

16,382 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

24 条评论

Rebecca V Anti-Communist 的头像
Rebecca V Anti-Communist1 年前

The reality is birth rates are dropping because we do not need an astronomical amount of people anymore with modern technology. It’s time to focus on quality of people rather than quantity. And it is much more difficult to encourage quality people to have children. Hard truth!

CNY Fertility 的头像
CNY Fertility1 年前

CNY Fertility offers top-quality fertility care for a fraction of the price. Learn why thousands choose CNY Fertility every year for their IVF and family-building needs. With over 30,000 lives created since 1997, your family starts here.

خليل إبراهيم 的头像
خليل إبراهيم1 年前

Arguing that underclass blacks shouldn’t be encouraged to reproduce, doesn’t change the fact that their total TFR is nearly identical to whites, and that every group in America(including Hispanics) is below replacement level, except for “native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander.”

matelund dunlap 的头像
matelund dunlap1 年前

Who would be incentivized to just have a child because of $5,000? Like that would be the reason to conceive. Oh and Wingstop.

Tommy Chong Duk 的头像
Tommy Chong Duk1 年前

I didn't used to be so jaded, but I too am coming to the position that these incentives are all fucked up. I never bitched to you about it but that special ed kid I helped. His mother ended up squeezing out a third one. Which in my mind was a detriment to the two she...

LucasD 的头像
LucasD1 年前

How about if a professional woman has a child, the government will pay here the average of her past 5 years of reported income, and pay that same amount for 5 years so she can stay at home, until child goes to school. And If she continues to work, pay her 50% of that value.

Bear Man 的头像
Bear Man1 年前

Shut up bitch.

Napoleon The Fiddler 的头像
Napoleon The Fiddler1 年前

This was tried, when WASPs, who used to have like 10 kids a pair for literal centuries, starting having 3-4 kids at the turn of the 20th century. Well that was a problem for them because blacks and Catholics didn’t stop having kids like they did. So then they had a genius idea and created planned parenthood, as per the stated goals of the abortion program according to Margret Sanger. Stopping blacks from reproducing as much. Except all that happened was that now with abortion, instead of WASPs having 3 kids, then they starting having 1-2 and aborting the other. And instead of blacks having 7 kids they had 5. It doesn’t take a mathematician… So the entire premise is self defeating, if you’re so desperate that you believe you have to genocide the children of your enemies or else you will die out, then the die is already cast, you’ve lost. Just have more babies and by default you’ll be the winning demographic.

BruceLeeVegas69 的头像
BruceLeeVegas691 年前

offer anyone <=85IQ to get sterilized. Sliding scale to most retarded get more money.

DefundTheABC 的头像
DefundTheABC1 年前

Or sterilisation for a one year subscription card to KFC🍗

Abbie 的头像
Abbie1 年前

And, speaking of kids, here is today's "Quelle Surprise" revelation by @kanyewest: Remember everyone, this man has at least FOUR known kids. (Cringe-de-la-CRINGE!)

Voice of Reason 的头像
Voice of Reason1 年前

Poor people should seriously consider having less kids, having less offspring means you can utilize the limited resources you have more effectively. As someone who grew up in the slums, it was filled with broken homes and souls heades by single mother households.

The California Rifleman 的头像
The California Rifleman1 年前

That, and mandatory removal of custody from parents who cannot provide for their children. When children are raised by bad parents and in bad homes, society has a moral obligation to intervene. Failing to do so is a form of child neglect.

Alberta-Leonidas 的头像
Alberta-Leonidas1 年前

correct we should not be taxing the producers, and rewarding the takers, it should be reversed

fag free zone 的头像
fag free zone1 年前

tubes tied and vasectomy to all blacks and the problem is solved

Erick Vivas 的头像
Erick Vivas1 年前

Guess who is going to start having babies? Those who need the $5000, and then guess what? Is not enough to raise a kid.

Michelangelo 的头像
Michelangelo1 年前

Watch all the Ratchet hoodrats line up for their $5k trumbux per child now...

paultheass 的头像
paultheass1 年前

They don't need incentivization to have kids, they already have desire to have them. You don't. As such, they beat you in your own game.

🇲🇽 Brandon Sepulveda 的头像
🇲🇽 Brandon Sepulveda1 年前

Making the cost of having children more expensive will definitely reverse declining births rates and increase the number of workers per social security beneficiary 😎

NoblePariah 的头像
NoblePariah1 年前

sounds a lot like you are explaining the merit of eugenics

KBB (Discussed on Red Scare) 的头像
KBB (Discussed on Red Scare)1 年前

Based

LucasD 的头像
LucasD1 年前

It's possible to focus incentives for higher human capital... have increasing tax breaks based on number of kids as income increases for middle/high. Even moreso for married, joint tax filers.

Mickeyblueyes58 的头像
Mickeyblueyes581 年前

Wrong births, apropos of a global concern

So much losing 的头像
So much losing1 年前

WTAF? "Wrong births"? Are you Hitler's incarnate?

相关视频