正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

We recently shared a case study of 30 different clinics throughout Europe utilizing our tech stack to be able to conduct clinical investigations in the medical space. In this particular example, as with many others, there are laws that prohibit the disclosure of certain types of data across national... boundaries, across institutional boundaries, and about specific patients in a medical context. However, because of our tech stack’s flexibility and the disclosures and selective disclosure, these clinical investigators are able to perform medical research on this data that otherwise would be impossible to share and to aggregate to be able to achieve such an outcome. In addition to enabling better experiences for things like airdrops, ensuring that bots and sybils are not receiving tokens, our tech stack is also enabling the frontier of science to move forward in places where it is otherwise blocked. My challenge to the questions of the privacy paradox around what we're discussing here is the plethora of use cases where the immense amount of value on the other end far outweighs a question of personal preference or immediate value exchange. I would like to know: How often do you think about those larger scale use cases versus individual interactions when you think about privacy? Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025show more

Billions Network

507,558 subscribers

69,337 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"What is the cleanest way to compare Billions with other web3 identity layers and privacy layers?" The word privacy means a lot of things to a lot of different people. Often it is associated with consent, which is an action that you take that diminishes the privacy of a given set of data. Privacy is basically the process of information arbitrage, the selective disclosure of data in order to enable interactions. Although in a web2 environment, that "free" transaction of data often weighs very heavily to one side. When we talk about privacy at Billions Network, privacy is a static state, the absence of disclosure, or a way to describe the outcomes of mechanisms of data disclosure. We really focus on those instances where the selective disclosure of data is a question of legal compliance, of security, of financial value, where the decision to leverage this technology is not necessarily one of personal feelings, but rather of business efficiency, of compliance, and security. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025 In an era where AI is rapidly evolving, the boundaries of identity and privacy are being rewritten. Don’t miss our next Billions event in Shenzhen, China 🇨🇳 🗓 Date & Time Dec 21 (Sun), 20:00–23:00 Join a relaxed evening to experience our privacy-preserving verification and dive into the future of human + AI privacy In collaboration with: TinTinLand (TinTinLand 中文), Asia’s leading Web3 platform for developer growth and ecosystem acceleration.

"What is the cleanest way to compare Billions with other web3 identity layers and privacy layers?" The word privacy means a lot of things to a lot of different people. Often it is associated with consent, which is an action that you take that diminishes the privacy of a given set of data. Privacy is basically the process of information arbitrage, the selective disclosure of data in order to enable interactions. Although in a web2 environment, that "free" transaction of data often weighs very heavily to one side. When we talk about privacy at Billions Network, privacy is a static state, the absence of disclosure, or a way to describe the outcomes of mechanisms of data disclosure. We really focus on those instances where the selective disclosure of data is a question of legal compliance, of security, of financial value, where the decision to leverage this technology is not necessarily one of personal feelings, but rather of business efficiency, of compliance, and security. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025 In an era where AI is rapidly evolving, the boundaries of identity and privacy are being rewritten. Don’t miss our next Billions event in Shenzhen, China 🇨🇳 🗓 Date & Time Dec 21 (Sun), 20:00–23:00 Join a relaxed evening to experience our privacy-preserving verification and dive into the future of human + AI privacy In collaboration with: TinTinLand (TinTinLand 中文), Asia’s leading Web3 platform for developer growth and ecosystem acceleration.

Billions

20,164 次观看 • 8 个月前

Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin interviewed by HoC Founder Diederick Jacobs at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025 Diederick: There's a lot of privacy issues with AI. Your data obviously is being used, that's one. But more importantly it can be used against you and that is very scary. How do we determine who we can trust and who we cannot trust? Because across history, sometimes parties switch. Evin: How do we determine roots of trust? Who are the entities who we trust? That is not really a technical question, that is more of a social and philosophical question. But as the basis for roots of trust, one of the most expressive and specific entities who we look to are the issuers of government documents. With Billions Network, we have integrated with more than 100 different government ID systems around the world to make it easy for citizens to do things like take their passport, tap it to their phone, pull the data out of the NFC chip in their passport, and be able to represent that in a privacy preserving and compliant way to different applications onchain and online.

Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin interviewed by HoC Founder Diederick Jacobs at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025 Diederick: There's a lot of privacy issues with AI. Your data obviously is being used, that's one. But more importantly it can be used against you and that is very scary. How do we determine who we can trust and who we cannot trust? Because across history, sometimes parties switch. Evin: How do we determine roots of trust? Who are the entities who we trust? That is not really a technical question, that is more of a social and philosophical question. But as the basis for roots of trust, one of the most expressive and specific entities who we look to are the issuers of government documents. With Billions Network, we have integrated with more than 100 different government ID systems around the world to make it easy for citizens to do things like take their passport, tap it to their phone, pull the data out of the NFC chip in their passport, and be able to represent that in a privacy preserving and compliant way to different applications onchain and online.

Billions Network

65,208 次观看 • 8 个月前

How do you verify AI? Great question. I would invite us to take a step back to the fundamentals of the question we're asking here: Accountability requires identity. To manage counterparty risk with AI agents, we need to be able to have some accountability mechanism. That means we need to be able to identify instances of AI agents to be able to determine, for example, whether they're acting on behalf of a party that's passed KYC with an acceptable provider, whether they're acting on behalf of a party who is not on a sanctions list, or not part of the OFAC address set, and being able to verify that an agent is acting on behalf of an individual who's above a certain age. This allows us to deploy much more sophisticated multi-agent workflows and role sets. But of course, first we need to be able to ask that agent, "Who are you accountable to? Who are you representing?" This is also essential in a world where deep fakes and misrepresentations of real individuals are rampant. In fact, I actually had the personal and very weird experience recently of seeing a deep fake of myself circulate on this very platform on X. Additionally, my co-founder and colleague has heard about deep fakes misrepresenting him joining Google Meet calls and misrepresenting his person, his resources, his activities. So in order to verify who you're interacting with, especially when it comes to not only "Are they a human being or not?" but also, "Are they the real human being?" this again gets us back to the question of which identifiers are we using and how are they accountable back to organizations and entities who we know and trust. But happy to answer any questions that you have on the agent identity front. That's definitely one of the more frontier capabilities that we're releasing some awesome stuff around in the next few weeks. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

How do you verify AI? Great question. I would invite us to take a step back to the fundamentals of the question we're asking here: Accountability requires identity. To manage counterparty risk with AI agents, we need to be able to have some accountability mechanism. That means we need to be able to identify instances of AI agents to be able to determine, for example, whether they're acting on behalf of a party that's passed KYC with an acceptable provider, whether they're acting on behalf of a party who is not on a sanctions list, or not part of the OFAC address set, and being able to verify that an agent is acting on behalf of an individual who's above a certain age. This allows us to deploy much more sophisticated multi-agent workflows and role sets. But of course, first we need to be able to ask that agent, "Who are you accountable to? Who are you representing?" This is also essential in a world where deep fakes and misrepresentations of real individuals are rampant. In fact, I actually had the personal and very weird experience recently of seeing a deep fake of myself circulate on this very platform on X. Additionally, my co-founder and colleague has heard about deep fakes misrepresenting him joining Google Meet calls and misrepresenting his person, his resources, his activities. So in order to verify who you're interacting with, especially when it comes to not only "Are they a human being or not?" but also, "Are they the real human being?" this again gets us back to the question of which identifiers are we using and how are they accountable back to organizations and entities who we know and trust. But happy to answer any questions that you have on the agent identity front. That's definitely one of the more frontier capabilities that we're releasing some awesome stuff around in the next few weeks. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions Network

114,254 次观看 • 8 个月前

What does the reputation model look like for agents? (alpha leak below) And how do we associate the proofs that we have about human beings with the agents who represent them? You may have heard of a process called KYC or Know Your Customer. That's very common with traditional financial applications and services. We have introduced a concept that we call KYA or Know Your Agent, which is a structured way to be able to express what model, how data was used in training, who the deployer is, what entities this agent instance is accountable back to, providing not only provenance but identity of the associated organization or entity. That's also another root of trust that we think about a lot: Enterprises and organizations tied back to things like their domains. To share a little bit of an alpha leak here, a product that we're excited to be rolling out in the next few weeks will allow our enterprise partners to more easily verify and prove the traits and capabilities of their teams as well as their counterparties. On the agent front, that makes it really easy to prove that an agent is acting on behalf of a given business or entity. We've already seen lawsuits where the absence of such technology has been a huge risk, such as with airlines that incorporate ChatGPT wrappers in their support pages. And then those AI enabled interactions end up making up plane tickets that don't exist and those airlines have to honor them. As small of an example as that might be, being able to prove agent accountability also unlocks a huge set of opportunities for use in enterprise for those agent to agent interactions. The Deep Trust Framework that our team has put together that we're excited to be bringing into a friendly SDK form in the next few weeks for some of our partners includes those reputation based capabilities, so how you can basically keep track of the interactions an agent has had, associate all of that to the entity to which they're accountable, and then that creates a sustainable reputation model for these agent to agent Interactions. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

What does the reputation model look like for agents? (alpha leak below) And how do we associate the proofs that we have about human beings with the agents who represent them? You may have heard of a process called KYC or Know Your Customer. That's very common with traditional financial applications and services. We have introduced a concept that we call KYA or Know Your Agent, which is a structured way to be able to express what model, how data was used in training, who the deployer is, what entities this agent instance is accountable back to, providing not only provenance but identity of the associated organization or entity. That's also another root of trust that we think about a lot: Enterprises and organizations tied back to things like their domains. To share a little bit of an alpha leak here, a product that we're excited to be rolling out in the next few weeks will allow our enterprise partners to more easily verify and prove the traits and capabilities of their teams as well as their counterparties. On the agent front, that makes it really easy to prove that an agent is acting on behalf of a given business or entity. We've already seen lawsuits where the absence of such technology has been a huge risk, such as with airlines that incorporate ChatGPT wrappers in their support pages. And then those AI enabled interactions end up making up plane tickets that don't exist and those airlines have to honor them. As small of an example as that might be, being able to prove agent accountability also unlocks a huge set of opportunities for use in enterprise for those agent to agent interactions. The Deep Trust Framework that our team has put together that we're excited to be bringing into a friendly SDK form in the next few weeks for some of our partners includes those reputation based capabilities, so how you can basically keep track of the interactions an agent has had, associate all of that to the entity to which they're accountable, and then that creates a sustainable reputation model for these agent to agent Interactions. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions Network

68,503 次观看 • 8 个月前

When you say the word "crypto" many people think "cryptocurrency" not "cryptography" which is the mathematical basis of being able to verify information that also underpins blockchain technology. Blockchains now are not just about currency. They are trust layers that allow us to anchor verifiable claims such as the claim of age based on a passport in a way that is tamper-resistant and verifiable without storing that actual data on-chain. You can think of a blockchain as "write once, never erase, but you can update." In the context of regulation that's really powerful because you can comply with laws and emerging regulations such as those in the UK and EU in a way that also respects the privacy and consent of users. Source: Biometric Update Podcast Episode 24 with Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin

When you say the word "crypto" many people think "cryptocurrency" not "cryptography" which is the mathematical basis of being able to verify information that also underpins blockchain technology. Blockchains now are not just about currency. They are trust layers that allow us to anchor verifiable claims such as the claim of age based on a passport in a way that is tamper-resistant and verifiable without storing that actual data on-chain. You can think of a blockchain as "write once, never erase, but you can update." In the context of regulation that's really powerful because you can comply with laws and emerging regulations such as those in the UK and EU in a way that also respects the privacy and consent of users. Source: Biometric Update Podcast Episode 24 with Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin

Billions Network

49,748 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk: Do we want to be in many worlds, or forever confined to Earth? “There are so many things to worry about, so many things to be concerned about. There are many troubles in the world, of course, and these are important, and we need to solve them. But we also need things that make us excited to be alive, that make us glad to wake up in the morning and be fired up about the future and think the future is going to be great. Space exploration is one of those things. Becoming a space-faring civilization, being out there among the stars, this is one of the things that I know makes me glad to be alive. I think it makes many people glad to be alive. It's one of the best things. Really, we're faced with a choice: Which future do you want? Do you want a future where we become a space-faring civilization and are in many worlds and are out there among the stars, or one where we are forever confined to Earth? I say it is the first. And I hope you agree with me.” Starship Update, September 2019

Elon Musk: Do we want to be in many worlds, or forever confined to Earth? “There are so many things to worry about, so many things to be concerned about. There are many troubles in the world, of course, and these are important, and we need to solve them. But we also need things that make us excited to be alive, that make us glad to wake up in the morning and be fired up about the future and think the future is going to be great. Space exploration is one of those things. Becoming a space-faring civilization, being out there among the stars, this is one of the things that I know makes me glad to be alive. I think it makes many people glad to be alive. It's one of the best things. Really, we're faced with a choice: Which future do you want? Do you want a future where we become a space-faring civilization and are in many worlds and are out there among the stars, or one where we are forever confined to Earth? I say it is the first. And I hope you agree with me.” Starship Update, September 2019

ELON CLIPS

1,684,222 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk about the meaning of life and the trap of wishful thinking : “When I was a kid, I was wondering what's the meaning of life? Like, why are we here? What's it all about? And I came to the conclusion that what really matters is trying to understand the right questions to ask. And the more that we can increase the scope and scale of human consciousness, the better we are able to ask these questions. And so I think that there are certain things that are necessary to ensure that the future is good. One of the biggest mistakes people generally make, and I'm guilty of it too, is wishful thinking. You know, like, you want something to be true even if it isn't true. And so you ignore the things that you ignore the real truth because of what you want to be true. This is a very difficult trap to avoid.”

Elon Musk about the meaning of life and the trap of wishful thinking : “When I was a kid, I was wondering what's the meaning of life? Like, why are we here? What's it all about? And I came to the conclusion that what really matters is trying to understand the right questions to ask. And the more that we can increase the scope and scale of human consciousness, the better we are able to ask these questions. And so I think that there are certain things that are necessary to ensure that the future is good. One of the biggest mistakes people generally make, and I'm guilty of it too, is wishful thinking. You know, like, you want something to be true even if it isn't true. And so you ignore the things that you ignore the real truth because of what you want to be true. This is a very difficult trap to avoid.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

75,023 次观看 • 9 个月前

Finland President Alexander Stubb: Well, we have to be more independent in some cases. If you, for example, look at storage of personal data, obviously a lot of Europeans are angry that their personal data is stored outside of the EU. So we have to build our own data centers and our own AI factories so we can actually own the data of our own citizens. But in the end, there is no such thing as European full autonomy. You will always need to collaborate with our friends in Canada, in the US, in other partnerships around the world. ASML and other tech companies can play a crucial role both in the US and here.

Finland President Alexander Stubb: Well, we have to be more independent in some cases. If you, for example, look at storage of personal data, obviously a lot of Europeans are angry that their personal data is stored outside of the EU. So we have to build our own data centers and our own AI factories so we can actually own the data of our own citizens. But in the end, there is no such thing as European full autonomy. You will always need to collaborate with our friends in Canada, in the US, in other partnerships around the world. ASML and other tech companies can play a crucial role both in the US and here.

Clash Report

20,444 次观看 • 1 个月前

Iga Swiatek on constantly being filmed at Australian Open and other tournaments, ‘The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? It would be nice to have some privacy’ “I wanted to ask something that Coco was talking about last night. The cameras backstage at the tournament… I know you got filmed recently forgetting your credential… you’re sort of always on camera at a lot of different tournament areas.. I’m wondering if you think there should be more privacy for players and their teams as they’re back there? Or how you see the balance of that versus them trying to have entertainment and content coming out.” Iga: “The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? Where they are observed even when they’re pooping. Ok, that was exaggerating obviously, but it would be nice to have some privacy. It would be nice also to have your own process and not always be observed. For example, in other sports, you have some technical things you wanna do. It would be nice to have some space you can do that without the whole world watching. On Wimbledon there are courts where people with accreditation can get there but it’s without the fans. There are some tournaments where it’s impossible and you’re constantly observed. I don’t think it should be like that because we are tennis players. We’re meant to be watched on court and in the press. That’s our job. It’s not our job to be a meme when you forget your accreditation. It’s funny for sure. People have something to talk about. For us, I don’t think it’s necessary.” “Have you talked to the tournament about it here?” Iga: “What’s the point?” (via Australian Open Press)

Iga Swiatek on constantly being filmed at Australian Open and other tournaments, ‘The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? It would be nice to have some privacy’ “I wanted to ask something that Coco was talking about last night. The cameras backstage at the tournament… I know you got filmed recently forgetting your credential… you’re sort of always on camera at a lot of different tournament areas.. I’m wondering if you think there should be more privacy for players and their teams as they’re back there? Or how you see the balance of that versus them trying to have entertainment and content coming out.” Iga: “The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? Where they are observed even when they’re pooping. Ok, that was exaggerating obviously, but it would be nice to have some privacy. It would be nice also to have your own process and not always be observed. For example, in other sports, you have some technical things you wanna do. It would be nice to have some space you can do that without the whole world watching. On Wimbledon there are courts where people with accreditation can get there but it’s without the fans. There are some tournaments where it’s impossible and you’re constantly observed. I don’t think it should be like that because we are tennis players. We’re meant to be watched on court and in the press. That’s our job. It’s not our job to be a meme when you forget your accreditation. It’s funny for sure. People have something to talk about. For us, I don’t think it’s necessary.” “Have you talked to the tournament about it here?” Iga: “What’s the point?” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

591,804 次观看 • 6 个月前

ASML CEO on Elon Musk's Data Centers in space and Terafab: "I think you need a certain amount of data centers and they will be in space, they will be on the earth. I think the discussion about data centers in space is to address another potential bottleneck in the ecosystem, which is energy. I think the discussion around putting data center in space is there because if you do that, the energy consumption or the energy availability will be there, about trying to solve another potential big issue, which is energy for data center. I think the Terafab is an example of a major fab project."

ASML CEO on Elon Musk's Data Centers in space and Terafab: "I think you need a certain amount of data centers and they will be in space, they will be on the earth. I think the discussion about data centers in space is to address another potential bottleneck in the ecosystem, which is energy. I think the discussion around putting data center in space is there because if you do that, the energy consumption or the energy availability will be there, about trying to solve another potential big issue, which is energy for data center. I think the Terafab is an example of a major fab project."

DogeDesigner

48,139 次观看 • 2 个月前

Krishna on how Anthropic thinks about the platform vs. application layer, and when they decide to build their own products like Claude Code. It’s the question every investor and founder is thinking about: “Most of what we're building is platform. There's so many examples of where a platform can accrue a lot of value, but the customers who are building on that platform actually accrue even more value. We will build our own applications on that same platform where a couple of things are true. Number one, if we feel like we have a vision into where the models are going and we can demonstrate that and create customer value in that, that might be something like Claude Code. The second is thinking about ways to demonstrate value for the ecosystem that others might emulate. If you think about Claude for financial services or Claude for life sciences, these are ways in which we've composed the platform. We're building on the same platform as our customers. That creates a level playing field. We also think that there's so much value that's going to accrue in these areas that our customers can win and we can win as well. So I think of our strategy as mostly horizontal. A lot of the value is going to accrue to the customers that are building on top of it. Our goal is build the best models and then build the products and tools and services that allow that intelligence to proliferate within customers."

Krishna on how Anthropic thinks about the platform vs. application layer, and when they decide to build their own products like Claude Code. It’s the question every investor and founder is thinking about: “Most of what we're building is platform. There's so many examples of where a platform can accrue a lot of value, but the customers who are building on that platform actually accrue even more value. We will build our own applications on that same platform where a couple of things are true. Number one, if we feel like we have a vision into where the models are going and we can demonstrate that and create customer value in that, that might be something like Claude Code. The second is thinking about ways to demonstrate value for the ecosystem that others might emulate. If you think about Claude for financial services or Claude for life sciences, these are ways in which we've composed the platform. We're building on the same platform as our customers. That creates a level playing field. We also think that there's so much value that's going to accrue in these areas that our customers can win and we can win as well. So I think of our strategy as mostly horizontal. A lot of the value is going to accrue to the customers that are building on top of it. Our goal is build the best models and then build the products and tools and services that allow that intelligence to proliferate within customers."

Patrick OShaughnessy

113,826 次观看 • 3 个月前

Former medical coder/whistleblower Zowe Smith: "A Palantir program called Tiberius, which [is] used in Gaza... [was used] to assign risk scores... in America during Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines and then to figure out where the countermeasures [go]—as in where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the remdesivir need to go? So they've already had these programs in place that are tied into our medical records. And then to hear Larry Ellison say, 'We're going to use your medical records and your DNA, your personal data to design stuff directly to you.' And then in addition... say 'We're going to put wearables on you,' they're going to monitor your body at all times—for the purposes of national security. And I don't know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine of every single citizen in this country." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from an interview with David Knight (David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F) posted to Rumble on November 13, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "It's a giant web and it is going to be tied to our behavior scores and if we comply, how much we comply with it. Looking at who's monitoring the DNA, where they have to report the PCR results to, who's hiding the adverse effects of the vaccine, putting that all together and looking at, where are they actually, where are we reporting all of these PCR results and where are we reporting the COVID-19 case numbers? "And now we actually have a code to report, the COVID- 19 adverse effects, but it's still not being used. So looking at that and trying to figure out where the code was and why we're not able to report it still, I happen to find that every agency involved in monitoring COVID- 19 cases and vaccination tracking, specifically because there's so many vaccine registries, it blows your mind. "It's tied to national security. So it's a matter of national security if you participate in this scheme or not. "I think they're even going to try and do more data mining like go even further than PCR testing with the wearables rollout that we're getting now. Because the information, like when I learned that our COVID-19 case numbers, the PCR test is actually getting reported to foreign countries and our DNA is being data mined and they're able to tell if we've had a vaccine or not, what's our ethnicity, where we are, how much money we make. Like they're layering all of this information. "And during Operation Warp Speed they had a program called Tiberius which was used in hospitals. There's different Palantir programs that are used in hospitals to monitor and manage the hospital down to, like, staffing. There was even a program that was part of Operation Warp Speed called HHS Protect. And the hospitals had to report how many ventilators were in use, how many patients were there... "So they had this program that hospitals had to report how many ventilators, how many patients are in the ICU, how much remdesivir we were using. What's our census report, like all kinds of information that even the hospital didn't want to have to report, in addition to all the other data mining we were doing. And that program was a Palantir program, called Tiberius, which it's used in Gaza and that's the one that they use to assign risk scores. "Well, they use that here already in America during Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines and then to figure out where the countermeasures as in where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the remdesivir need to go? So they've already had these programs in place that are tied into our medical records. And then to hear Larry Ellison say, we're going to use your medical records and your DNA, your personal data to design stuff directly to you. "And then in addition, they say we're going to put wearables on you. They're going to monitor your body at all times. For the purposes of national security. And I don't know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine of every single citizen in this country."

Former medical coder/whistleblower Zowe Smith: "A Palantir program called Tiberius, which [is] used in Gaza... [was used] to assign risk scores... in America during Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines and then to figure out where the countermeasures [go]—as in where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the remdesivir need to go? So they've already had these programs in place that are tied into our medical records. And then to hear Larry Ellison say, 'We're going to use your medical records and your DNA, your personal data to design stuff directly to you.' And then in addition... say 'We're going to put wearables on you,' they're going to monitor your body at all times—for the purposes of national security. And I don't know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine of every single citizen in this country." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from an interview with David Knight (David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F) posted to Rumble on November 13, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "It's a giant web and it is going to be tied to our behavior scores and if we comply, how much we comply with it. Looking at who's monitoring the DNA, where they have to report the PCR results to, who's hiding the adverse effects of the vaccine, putting that all together and looking at, where are they actually, where are we reporting all of these PCR results and where are we reporting the COVID-19 case numbers? "And now we actually have a code to report, the COVID- 19 adverse effects, but it's still not being used. So looking at that and trying to figure out where the code was and why we're not able to report it still, I happen to find that every agency involved in monitoring COVID- 19 cases and vaccination tracking, specifically because there's so many vaccine registries, it blows your mind. "It's tied to national security. So it's a matter of national security if you participate in this scheme or not. "I think they're even going to try and do more data mining like go even further than PCR testing with the wearables rollout that we're getting now. Because the information, like when I learned that our COVID-19 case numbers, the PCR test is actually getting reported to foreign countries and our DNA is being data mined and they're able to tell if we've had a vaccine or not, what's our ethnicity, where we are, how much money we make. Like they're layering all of this information. "And during Operation Warp Speed they had a program called Tiberius which was used in hospitals. There's different Palantir programs that are used in hospitals to monitor and manage the hospital down to, like, staffing. There was even a program that was part of Operation Warp Speed called HHS Protect. And the hospitals had to report how many ventilators were in use, how many patients were there... "So they had this program that hospitals had to report how many ventilators, how many patients are in the ICU, how much remdesivir we were using. What's our census report, like all kinds of information that even the hospital didn't want to have to report, in addition to all the other data mining we were doing. And that program was a Palantir program, called Tiberius, which it's used in Gaza and that's the one that they use to assign risk scores. "Well, they use that here already in America during Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines and then to figure out where the countermeasures as in where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the remdesivir need to go? So they've already had these programs in place that are tied into our medical records. And then to hear Larry Ellison say, we're going to use your medical records and your DNA, your personal data to design stuff directly to you. "And then in addition, they say we're going to put wearables on you. They're going to monitor your body at all times. For the purposes of national security. And I don't know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine of every single citizen in this country."

Sense Receptor

19,193 次观看 • 9 个月前

Whitney Webb on 15-minute cities: "The goal [is] to have people... corralled [so] they're easily surveilled and controlled." "[They would] share... apartments when [they're] not there." "[They would] lose... car ownership, [so they] can't really control where [they] go." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So I haven't written extensively about 15- minute cities, but I would argue that the goal, there is basically to have people more or less corralled into an area where they're easily surveilled and controlled. And that's basically the... interest here is how do a small few rule the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or do anything about it. "Ultimately, this ruling system that they've been attempting to impose on, on people really around the world, because this is a global governance project at the end of the day, is, you know, using Big Tech tools in, in mass surveillance to basically create an entirely new way of life and system of living. "Part of that is to basically reduce the share of what the many, i.e., the 99% or whatever, have. So, you know, a lot of this, you know, became extremely, you know, unpopular. But also like people learned about it during the COVID era because of, you know, these groups like the World Economic Forum, which by the way, bills itself, is the premier promoter of public-private partnerships, that, you know, we need to not own our cars, we need to, rent them. And there should be autonomous fleets of Ubers that drive everyone around a specific radius. We shouldn't own homes. We should, you know, rent apartments and then share those apartments when we're not there and we leave, someone else can occupy the space. "These were all things, that were promoted under the guise, you know, of, of sustainability and other things at the time. But they're actively being, you know, designed and acted upon. "Actually one of the Columbus smart city initiatives that's connected to this Columbus partnership that that Wexner ran. He chaired it basically from 2001, I think, until 2021. So like 20 years, including when this was created. Columbus got a huge Department of Transportation grant from the government and also, you know, funding from private individuals, probably Wexner, but who knows, to to basically create a new system that in Columbus where private car ownership would not exist. "It would be fleets of, you know, smart cars, autonomous cars that drive people around. And so if you lose private car ownership, you can't really control where you go. And so these cars would determine, you know, would. Would have specific routes that you could, you know, pay to use and what have you. "And, interestingly enough, this was actually a goal for the entire United States, described in this by this national Security Commission on AI which was chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google and had a lot of these same Big Tech guys, who's who are have major roles at companies with New Albany data centers. "They basically said that in order for the US they said to beat China in AI it was necessary to end private car ownership in the United States and instead have autonomous, you know, Waymos, basically, drive every, fleets of them, Uber everybody around to where they were supposed to go and have things you know, sort of planned out by AI. Like where people are going, where people are working and all of this. "So the Technocracy Inc. model that you highlighted earlier, you know it was really influenced by things like Taylorism and a lot of these schools of thought that came out of the Industrial revolution that prioritize efficiency above all else. You know, having the trains run on time and all of that stuff being you know the kind of obsession of of these people in that particular era. "And so they want to sort of apply that not just to industry but to micromanaging people's lives as they you know, extract and exploit us for data and how much money our serf-like lives will make for them."

Whitney Webb on 15-minute cities: "The goal [is] to have people... corralled [so] they're easily surveilled and controlled." "[They would] share... apartments when [they're] not there." "[They would] lose... car ownership, [so they] can't really control where [they] go." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So I haven't written extensively about 15- minute cities, but I would argue that the goal, there is basically to have people more or less corralled into an area where they're easily surveilled and controlled. And that's basically the... interest here is how do a small few rule the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or do anything about it. "Ultimately, this ruling system that they've been attempting to impose on, on people really around the world, because this is a global governance project at the end of the day, is, you know, using Big Tech tools in, in mass surveillance to basically create an entirely new way of life and system of living. "Part of that is to basically reduce the share of what the many, i.e., the 99% or whatever, have. So, you know, a lot of this, you know, became extremely, you know, unpopular. But also like people learned about it during the COVID era because of, you know, these groups like the World Economic Forum, which by the way, bills itself, is the premier promoter of public-private partnerships, that, you know, we need to not own our cars, we need to, rent them. And there should be autonomous fleets of Ubers that drive everyone around a specific radius. We shouldn't own homes. We should, you know, rent apartments and then share those apartments when we're not there and we leave, someone else can occupy the space. "These were all things, that were promoted under the guise, you know, of, of sustainability and other things at the time. But they're actively being, you know, designed and acted upon. "Actually one of the Columbus smart city initiatives that's connected to this Columbus partnership that that Wexner ran. He chaired it basically from 2001, I think, until 2021. So like 20 years, including when this was created. Columbus got a huge Department of Transportation grant from the government and also, you know, funding from private individuals, probably Wexner, but who knows, to to basically create a new system that in Columbus where private car ownership would not exist. "It would be fleets of, you know, smart cars, autonomous cars that drive people around. And so if you lose private car ownership, you can't really control where you go. And so these cars would determine, you know, would. Would have specific routes that you could, you know, pay to use and what have you. "And, interestingly enough, this was actually a goal for the entire United States, described in this by this national Security Commission on AI which was chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google and had a lot of these same Big Tech guys, who's who are have major roles at companies with New Albany data centers. "They basically said that in order for the US they said to beat China in AI it was necessary to end private car ownership in the United States and instead have autonomous, you know, Waymos, basically, drive every, fleets of them, Uber everybody around to where they were supposed to go and have things you know, sort of planned out by AI. Like where people are going, where people are working and all of this. "So the Technocracy Inc. model that you highlighted earlier, you know it was really influenced by things like Taylorism and a lot of these schools of thought that came out of the Industrial revolution that prioritize efficiency above all else. You know, having the trains run on time and all of that stuff being you know the kind of obsession of of these people in that particular era. "And so they want to sort of apply that not just to industry but to micromanaging people's lives as they you know, extract and exploit us for data and how much money our serf-like lives will make for them."

Sense Receptor

18,415 次观看 • 4 个月前

Did you know that Facebook made $134.9 billion in 2023 from selling your data? Our society has come to the point where we accepted an unfair model in which privacy is being exploited and data gifted to big tech that is selling it for billions. We intend to break the norm of how data is shared on the internet because it is outdated and unfair. You should be empowered with more control and monetization models for your data!

Did you know that Facebook made $134.9 billion in 2023 from selling your data? Our society has come to the point where we accepted an unfair model in which privacy is being exploited and data gifted to big tech that is selling it for billions. We intend to break the norm of how data is shared on the internet because it is outdated and unfair. You should be empowered with more control and monetization models for your data!

Solana ID 🪷

30,458 次观看 • 1 年前

Beth Rigby, "You say that you won't compromise on the happiness of children, but you also know US big tech will hate this ban" "Are you concerned about how President Trump might react to this when you see him at the G7 and the consequences for the UK?" Keir Starmer, "This is about fighting for what we think is right" "I'm a fan of tech and AI, I think it has huge capabilities to change our world for the better, that's why I made a pro AI and tech speech at London Tech Week" "I do not accept that you can't be pro tech and AI and at the same time say we must protect our children" "The innovation is incredible in tech and AI. Don't tell me that's impossible for those innovators to devise a way to protect our children" "You can be pro AI and tech which I am, but also pro protecting our children which I am"

Beth Rigby, "You say that you won't compromise on the happiness of children, but you also know US big tech will hate this ban" "Are you concerned about how President Trump might react to this when you see him at the G7 and the consequences for the UK?" Keir Starmer, "This is about fighting for what we think is right" "I'm a fan of tech and AI, I think it has huge capabilities to change our world for the better, that's why I made a pro AI and tech speech at London Tech Week" "I do not accept that you can't be pro tech and AI and at the same time say we must protect our children" "The innovation is incredible in tech and AI. Don't tell me that's impossible for those innovators to devise a way to protect our children" "You can be pro AI and tech which I am, but also pro protecting our children which I am"

Farrukh

122,452 次观看 • 2 个月前

Right now our experience of the internet is in jeopardy. More than half of our interactions online and onchain come from non-human actors who are not identifiable, not accountable, not verifiable. That means as we look toward a stablecoin payment and AI agent enabled future, how are we going to facilitate payments if we don't know who we're paying? How will applications, display advertising, recommendations work if the counterparty who's interacting with those interfaces and in those digital spaces can’t identify itself as agent or human, or specific human? Or for things like onchain incentives, how can we ensure that tokens and value are arriving at the right users if we cannot tell Sybil accounts and redundant addresses from unique human beings? So for all of these use cases and more, things that touch enterprise and government as well, which we can get into later, we have a very glaring need to bring a layer of identity and trust to the internet that was originally built as a system, a network to communicate amongst computers, but lacked an identity system to acknowledge their users. That's the problem that we are solving with Billions Network. How can we make it really easy for you and the agents who serve you to prove who you are, your traits and capabilities and qualifications, in any space, physical or digital? What that means is that today Billions Network is the first universal human and AI network built with mobile first verification, so you can prove who you are and your agents can prove who they are, starting with comfortable experiences on the devices you already own. So no proprietary hardware. We do not rely on centralized servers to collect user data. Rather, your information, the sensitive data that makes you you, stays securely on your device. And we use zero knowledge proofs as a way to prove traits about you, such as the fact that you're over the age of 21, without revealing that sensitive personal data, such as what your exact birth date is. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Right now our experience of the internet is in jeopardy. More than half of our interactions online and onchain come from non-human actors who are not identifiable, not accountable, not verifiable. That means as we look toward a stablecoin payment and AI agent enabled future, how are we going to facilitate payments if we don't know who we're paying? How will applications, display advertising, recommendations work if the counterparty who's interacting with those interfaces and in those digital spaces can’t identify itself as agent or human, or specific human? Or for things like onchain incentives, how can we ensure that tokens and value are arriving at the right users if we cannot tell Sybil accounts and redundant addresses from unique human beings? So for all of these use cases and more, things that touch enterprise and government as well, which we can get into later, we have a very glaring need to bring a layer of identity and trust to the internet that was originally built as a system, a network to communicate amongst computers, but lacked an identity system to acknowledge their users. That's the problem that we are solving with Billions Network. How can we make it really easy for you and the agents who serve you to prove who you are, your traits and capabilities and qualifications, in any space, physical or digital? What that means is that today Billions Network is the first universal human and AI network built with mobile first verification, so you can prove who you are and your agents can prove who they are, starting with comfortable experiences on the devices you already own. So no proprietary hardware. We do not rely on centralized servers to collect user data. Rather, your information, the sensitive data that makes you you, stays securely on your device. And we use zero knowledge proofs as a way to prove traits about you, such as the fact that you're over the age of 21, without revealing that sensitive personal data, such as what your exact birth date is. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions Network

30,916 次观看 • 8 个月前

Alex Karp's take on the Department of War designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk: "In the warfighting context, the Department of War has to be the arbiter of what gets deployed." "I want to split domestic and foreign. In this country have God-given rights [like the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments]...Adversaries trying to kill us do not have those rights. And I've never believed in extending our rights to foreign countries that are adversarial to us." "On domestic stuff...there are real issues. I'm super sympathetic with restrictions around the use of these products in the domestic context." "Just to give you an example, there are datasets that are publicly available in the US market that I don't think should be used against you and me in a law enforcement context with the help of AI agents and ontology." "But if you don't use [this] on the battlefield, obviously Iran's going to use [it]. You don't think they can go online and buy those products?" "Without going into somewhat classified data, those things in combination with other things — [they're] lethal. A lot of people who want to hurt America end up dead because of our ability to aggregate and then figure out what's going on in the battlefield before they can figure out what we're doing." "So I'm very much in favor of it for moral reasons. But I'm also in favor of it because I don't know how else you explain this to the American people. We're going to take your job, we're going to eviscerate your ability to have money and power, but we're not going to defend you on the battlefield?"

Alex Karp's take on the Department of War designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk: "In the warfighting context, the Department of War has to be the arbiter of what gets deployed." "I want to split domestic and foreign. In this country have God-given rights [like the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments]...Adversaries trying to kill us do not have those rights. And I've never believed in extending our rights to foreign countries that are adversarial to us." "On domestic stuff...there are real issues. I'm super sympathetic with restrictions around the use of these products in the domestic context." "Just to give you an example, there are datasets that are publicly available in the US market that I don't think should be used against you and me in a law enforcement context with the help of AI agents and ontology." "But if you don't use [this] on the battlefield, obviously Iran's going to use [it]. You don't think they can go online and buy those products?" "Without going into somewhat classified data, those things in combination with other things — [they're] lethal. A lot of people who want to hurt America end up dead because of our ability to aggregate and then figure out what's going on in the battlefield before they can figure out what we're doing." "So I'm very much in favor of it for moral reasons. But I'm also in favor of it because I don't know how else you explain this to the American people. We're going to take your job, we're going to eviscerate your ability to have money and power, but we're not going to defend you on the battlefield?"

TBPN

57,264 次观看 • 5 个月前

YOUR REACTION: Following vote to hold him in contempt for withholding subpoenaed Biden audio tapes, Attorney General Garland rages, says, "There have been a series of unprecedented and, frankly, unfounded attacks on the Justice Department." WATCH "We have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure that the committees get responses to their legitimate requests. But this is not one to the contrary. This is one that would harm our ability in the future to successfully pursue sensitive investigations. "Now, there have been a series of unprecedented and, frankly, unfounded attacks on the Justice Department. This request, this effort to use contempt as a method of obtaining our sensitive law enforcement files is just the most recent. The effort to threaten to defund our investigations and the way in which there are contributions to an atmosphere that puts our agents and our prosecutors at risk. These are wrong. "Look, the only thing I can do is continue to do the right thing. I will protect this building and its people. "Why don't we respond? You can answer this just now, but I was wondering, like, you know, what these, this combined with the efforts to defund Jack Smith and the other attacks on Biden, administration officials say about, you know, the broader effort to discredit you and to discredit the Justice Department, and also, how would you manage that? How are you resisting that, and what can you do about that? "As attorney general, we have to go about our work following the federal principles of prosecution. As I said, we follow the facts and the law. We screen out outside inappropriate influences. That's what we're doing here. We're protecting our ability to continue to do high profile and sensitive investigations, and we will continue to do that. "Seems vanishing. The acts now seem vanishingly small that the two Jack Smith federal cases are going to begin trial, let alone finish trial this year. What does that say about the pace of the justice system and confidence in this Justice Department? "Look, the special counsel brought both cases last year. He appropriately requested speedy trials. The matter is now in the hands of the judiciary, and I'm not going to be able to comment any further."

Simon Ateba

710,407 次观看 • 2 年前

AOC in Berlin: "We all need to buckle up. That is the moment that we are in. But if there is any place that shows that good people can prevail over the horrors of inhumanity, it is Berlin. It is Berlin. And it is so many other places around the world that can be a front line to show that we can overcome and we can defeat fascism by a class based solidarity that champions all of us. I think about this, I think about this, and I'll end with this note, but I think about this very often because, of course, the universal health care systems in Europe are the envy of every American. And it is truly, ah, such a revolutionary. Environment that you all grow up in the universality of health care, because it really is a decision and an affirmative material commitment to everyone's basic humanity, to human dignity. And to me, it is not a coincidence that universal health care systems across Europe were established in the wake after World War Two. They are directly connected where you had all of this destruction, in all of this rubble that was built on a politics of persecution and division. But when we decided to move past that, we built material systems based on universality, affirming our our human dignity. And I think it's so important for us to recall those lessons for today, ah, as we confront many of the shadows of those similar movements."

AOC in Berlin: "We all need to buckle up. That is the moment that we are in. But if there is any place that shows that good people can prevail over the horrors of inhumanity, it is Berlin. It is Berlin. And it is so many other places around the world that can be a front line to show that we can overcome and we can defeat fascism by a class based solidarity that champions all of us. I think about this, I think about this, and I'll end with this note, but I think about this very often because, of course, the universal health care systems in Europe are the envy of every American. And it is truly, ah, such a revolutionary. Environment that you all grow up in the universality of health care, because it really is a decision and an affirmative material commitment to everyone's basic humanity, to human dignity. And to me, it is not a coincidence that universal health care systems across Europe were established in the wake after World War Two. They are directly connected where you had all of this destruction, in all of this rubble that was built on a politics of persecution and division. But when we decided to move past that, we built material systems based on universality, affirming our our human dignity. And I think it's so important for us to recall those lessons for today, ah, as we confront many of the shadows of those similar movements."

Winter

60,372 次观看 • 6 个月前

‼️JUST NOW — powerful brief remarks by the leaders of Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany in London: IN SHORT: Merz: “The coming days could be decisive for all of us. The destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. Nobody should doubt our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side.” Macron: "I think we have a lot of cards in our hands." Zelenskyy: "Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians." Starmer: "If there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. Matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine." FULL STATEMENTS: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "But the principles remain, the principles that we've operated on for a very, very long time, which is that we stand with Ukraine, and if there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. And that's why it's so important, that we repeatedly set out the principle forward that matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine. And we stand here to support you in the conflict and support you in the negotiations and make sure that this is a just and lasting settlement if we can get that far. You're very welcome for our discussions". President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy: "Thank you very much, Kir. Thank you for organizing this meeting. Thank you, friends, Emmanuel and Friedrich, and thank you for our joint meeting. I think that it is very important now to organize such a meeting and discuss very sensitive issues regarding these talks that we had, in the United States and between us. Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians. I think there are lot of what we have to discuss and speak about. So there are a lot of things which are very important for today. I think, unity between Europe and Ukraine, and also unity between Europe, Ukraine, and the U.S. There are some things which we can't manage without Americans, things which we can't manage without Europe, and that's why we need to make some important decisions". President of France Emmanuel Macron: "And thank you Volodymyr for being with us. You are always welcome. In France, I think we all support Ukraine, and we all support peace. And peace negotiations to have sustainable, robust peace. And I think we have a lot of cards in our hands. The financing and the quality of equipments and training programs to Ukraine, the fact that Ukraine is resisting in this war, and the fact that the Russian economy is starting to suffer, especially after our latest sanctions and the US sanctions. And now I think the main issue is the convergence between our common positions, Europeans and Ukrainians, and the U.S. to finalize these, peace negotiations and re-engage in a new phase in the best possible conditions for Ukraine, for the Europeans, and for our collective security". Chancellor of Germany Friedrich Merz: "I highly appreciate that we are having the opportunity to see you, Volodymyr, together with Emmanuel, and talking about the upcoming days, because this could be a decisive time for all of us. We are trying to continue our support for Ukraine, as you know. On the other hand, we are seeing these talks and negotiations in Moscow and in the U.S. I'm looking forward to hear from you what the outcome of these talks might be. And we are still and remain strongly behind Ukraine and giving support to your country, because we all know that the destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. So that's the reason why we are here, trying to figure out what we can do. And nobody should doubt on our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. And the outcome is open. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side, but we have to talk about that. That's why we are here".

‼️JUST NOW — powerful brief remarks by the leaders of Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany in London: IN SHORT: Merz: “The coming days could be decisive for all of us. The destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. Nobody should doubt our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side.” Macron: "I think we have a lot of cards in our hands." Zelenskyy: "Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians." Starmer: "If there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. Matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine." FULL STATEMENTS: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "But the principles remain, the principles that we've operated on for a very, very long time, which is that we stand with Ukraine, and if there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. And that's why it's so important, that we repeatedly set out the principle forward that matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine. And we stand here to support you in the conflict and support you in the negotiations and make sure that this is a just and lasting settlement if we can get that far. You're very welcome for our discussions". President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy: "Thank you very much, Kir. Thank you for organizing this meeting. Thank you, friends, Emmanuel and Friedrich, and thank you for our joint meeting. I think that it is very important now to organize such a meeting and discuss very sensitive issues regarding these talks that we had, in the United States and between us. Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians. I think there are lot of what we have to discuss and speak about. So there are a lot of things which are very important for today. I think, unity between Europe and Ukraine, and also unity between Europe, Ukraine, and the U.S. There are some things which we can't manage without Americans, things which we can't manage without Europe, and that's why we need to make some important decisions". President of France Emmanuel Macron: "And thank you Volodymyr for being with us. You are always welcome. In France, I think we all support Ukraine, and we all support peace. And peace negotiations to have sustainable, robust peace. And I think we have a lot of cards in our hands. The financing and the quality of equipments and training programs to Ukraine, the fact that Ukraine is resisting in this war, and the fact that the Russian economy is starting to suffer, especially after our latest sanctions and the US sanctions. And now I think the main issue is the convergence between our common positions, Europeans and Ukrainians, and the U.S. to finalize these, peace negotiations and re-engage in a new phase in the best possible conditions for Ukraine, for the Europeans, and for our collective security". Chancellor of Germany Friedrich Merz: "I highly appreciate that we are having the opportunity to see you, Volodymyr, together with Emmanuel, and talking about the upcoming days, because this could be a decisive time for all of us. We are trying to continue our support for Ukraine, as you know. On the other hand, we are seeing these talks and negotiations in Moscow and in the U.S. I'm looking forward to hear from you what the outcome of these talks might be. And we are still and remain strongly behind Ukraine and giving support to your country, because we all know that the destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. So that's the reason why we are here, trying to figure out what we can do. And nobody should doubt on our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. And the outcome is open. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side, but we have to talk about that. That's why we are here".

Kateryna Lisunova

373,089 次观看 • 8 个月前