正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Weeks of work for a senior Three.js dev is ONE prompt for Opus 5, literally 😅 Opus built this infinite physically simulated clothesline gallery using Three.js with 96 wave nodes, per card pendulum physics, custom rope shader with fibre noise and Fresnel rim. I don't even know half of... show more

The Bugged Dev

12,800 subscribers

27,937 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I've been pondering something... My end goal with my city simulator is to publish it on Steam. I was planning on using Three.js for prototyping and then porting this over to Unity to take advantage of ECS/Burst. But then I realized I could probably port all of the simulation code from TypeScript to Rust if I wanted to make it ultra-fast. And then I can continue to use Three.js for the renderer and then embed it into an Electron app. Is that a dumb idea? What pitfalls are there with this approach? Curious what people's experience publishing games using Electron has been.

I've been pondering something... My end goal with my city simulator is to publish it on Steam. I was planning on using Three.js for prototyping and then porting this over to Unity to take advantage of ECS/Burst. But then I realized I could probably port all of the simulation code from TypeScript to Rust if I wanted to make it ultra-fast. And then I can continue to use Three.js for the renderer and then embed it into an Electron app. Is that a dumb idea? What pitfalls are there with this approach? Curious what people's experience publishing games using Electron has been.

Dan Greenheck

48,037 次观看 • 1 个月前

Anthropic shouldn't have revealed this plugin. Its name speaks for itself "You should know" Its capability: Opus 5.5 writes, the second agent reads, garbage aside: you get only important and reliable information Opus 5.5 can run continuously for 60 minutes, generating long summaries that nobody checks And this is what many miss: > a test it skipped "for now" > a file it modified even though you didn't ask for it > a warning "this might break the system" hidden somewhere at the bottom All of this is written there. You just never saw it Now another AI checks the text for you This is an automatic feature Enabled with a single line: ⁠/plugin enable cc-plugin-you-should-know@builtin⁠ Do this when you start working: > Open Claude Code > Paste the line above > Give Opus a long task and see how it analyzes the text and eliminates obvious errors Now the agent won't waste your money: you will get the expected result Bookmark this

Anthropic shouldn't have revealed this plugin. Its name speaks for itself "You should know" Its capability: Opus 5.5 writes, the second agent reads, garbage aside: you get only important and reliable information Opus 5.5 can run continuously for 60 minutes, generating long summaries that nobody checks And this is what many miss: > a test it skipped "for now" > a file it modified even though you didn't ask for it > a warning "this might break the system" hidden somewhere at the bottom All of this is written there. You just never saw it Now another AI checks the text for you This is an automatic feature Enabled with a single line: ⁠/plugin enable cc-plugin-you-should-know@builtin⁠ Do this when you start working: > Open Claude Code > Paste the line above > Give Opus a long task and see how it analyzes the text and eliminates obvious errors Now the agent won't waste your money: you will get the expected result Bookmark this

Bober_smart

31,962 次观看 • 8 天前

CLIENT ASKED 20 YEAR OLD TO BUILD A "SIMPLE" WEBSITE THIS IS WHAT IT DELIVERED most websites look like this: -> Hero section -> Some text -> A few buttons -> Done Claude had other plans Here's what it built: -> Cinematic landing page with immersive animations -> Interactive particle effects -> Smooth scroll storytelling -> Premium UI inspired by Apple and luxury brands -> Responsive design without sacrificing performance → Production ready code in minutes the crazy part? there was no design agency no frontend team no weeks of back and forth revisions just one prompt and Claude Code while most developers are using AI to autocomplete code others are using it to build experiences that would've taken an entire team the gap isn't AI anymore it is imagination Bookmark this before every website starts looking like this

CLIENT ASKED 20 YEAR OLD TO BUILD A "SIMPLE" WEBSITE THIS IS WHAT IT DELIVERED most websites look like this: -> Hero section -> Some text -> A few buttons -> Done Claude had other plans Here's what it built: -> Cinematic landing page with immersive animations -> Interactive particle effects -> Smooth scroll storytelling -> Premium UI inspired by Apple and luxury brands -> Responsive design without sacrificing performance → Production ready code in minutes the crazy part? there was no design agency no frontend team no weeks of back and forth revisions just one prompt and Claude Code while most developers are using AI to autocomplete code others are using it to build experiences that would've taken an entire team the gap isn't AI anymore it is imagination Bookmark this before every website starts looking like this

0xSlyth

17,945 次观看 • 3 个月前

Code Interpreter in ChatGPT is incredible! Took me 5 mins to make this game. You can make your own game assets with any AI generator and then ask GPT-4 with Code Interpreter to write code. If you have any problems you can ask it to fix the errors. 1. Write this prompt: "write p5.js code for Asteroids where you control a spaceship with the mouse and shoot asteroids with the left click of the mouse. If your spaceship collides with an asteroid, you lose. If you shoot down all asteroids, you win! I want to use my own textures for the spaceship and for asteroids." 2. Go to Openprocessing website create and save sketch (you'll need to save it before uploading any texture files). Copy paste code from GPT-4 3. Generate texture files and remove backgrounds, for example in Clip Drop 4. Replace names of files with your filenames 5. Run the program 6. If something doesn't work ask GPT-4 to fix it (you can copy an error and paste in GPT-4) like you would ask a human programmer 7. To learn a bit of programming write these prompts to GPT-4: "Act as my programming teacher. Tell me an algorithm of Asteroids game in detail and make names of functions and explain what each of these functions will do. Don't write the code just yet." and then " Can you describe the algorithm overall for a 10-year-old child"

Code Interpreter in ChatGPT is incredible! Took me 5 mins to make this game. You can make your own game assets with any AI generator and then ask GPT-4 with Code Interpreter to write code. If you have any problems you can ask it to fix the errors. 1. Write this prompt: "write p5.js code for Asteroids where you control a spaceship with the mouse and shoot asteroids with the left click of the mouse. If your spaceship collides with an asteroid, you lose. If you shoot down all asteroids, you win! I want to use my own textures for the spaceship and for asteroids." 2. Go to Openprocessing website create and save sketch (you'll need to save it before uploading any texture files). Copy paste code from GPT-4 3. Generate texture files and remove backgrounds, for example in Clip Drop 4. Replace names of files with your filenames 5. Run the program 6. If something doesn't work ask GPT-4 to fix it (you can copy an error and paste in GPT-4) like you would ask a human programmer 7. To learn a bit of programming write these prompts to GPT-4: "Act as my programming teacher. Tell me an algorithm of Asteroids game in detail and make names of functions and explain what each of these functions will do. Don't write the code just yet." and then " Can you describe the algorithm overall for a 10-year-old child"

Kris Kashtanova

1,675,286 次观看 • 3 年前

Claude Code + Google Stitch 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯 Google just dropped a free AI design agent that solves Claude Code's biggest weakness: frontend design. One screenshot of a high-converting landing page → a production-ready site for your brand in minutes. All inside Google Stitch + Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are building advertorial pages and product launch pages for Meta but burning days on designer back-and-forth. If you're running Meta ads and need 5-10 different landing pages testing different hooks, angles, and offers — each one targeting a different audience and pain point — you know the bottleneck isn't the ads. It's the pages. Briefing designers, waiting for revisions, paying $2-5K per page. Stitch eliminates the design bottleneck: → Find a high-converting advertorial that's scaling on Meta → Screenshot it and drop it into Stitch (powered by Gemini 3.1) → Stitch redesigns it with your brand's colors, fonts, and imagery using Nano Banana 2 → Edit sections visually — headlines, CTAs, layouts — without touching code → Export the code and paste it into Claude Code → Claude builds the full production site and deploys to Vercel or Netlify in 60 seconds No designer. No $3K per landing page. No Claude Code frontend that looks like a template from 2019. What you get: → Designer-quality landing pages and advertorials built in minutes, not weeks → Visual editing so you actually see the design before you code it → Nano Banana 2 generating on-brand product imagery and hero shots → A repeatable system — new angle, new page, same pipeline Built 100% with Google Stitch 2.0 + Claude Code. I put together a full playbook showing the exact workflow: how to find winning pages, redesign them in Stitch, and deploy with Claude Code. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "STITCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

126,711 次观看 • 6 个月前

Okay, motion designers are 100% cooked. Saw on x that Opus 5.5 could do advanced animations and I was skeptical at first. So I gave it a one sentence prompt, and it one shot this in 15 minutes. Will add the prompt below, but this is genuinely mind blowing. This level of work would have costed $8,000 - $10,000 with a motion design team and 3-4 week turnaround with multiple revisions. Claude did it in one go with this prompt: "make a dynamic 15-second motion graphics video that shows what an incredible motion designer you are, like it's your showreel for a résumé. go all out." The only thing remaining for humans is creativity and critical thinking.

Okay, motion designers are 100% cooked. Saw on x that Opus 5.5 could do advanced animations and I was skeptical at first. So I gave it a one sentence prompt, and it one shot this in 15 minutes. Will add the prompt below, but this is genuinely mind blowing. This level of work would have costed $8,000 - $10,000 with a motion design team and 3-4 week turnaround with multiple revisions. Claude did it in one go with this prompt: "make a dynamic 15-second motion graphics video that shows what an incredible motion designer you are, like it's your showreel for a résumé. go all out." The only thing remaining for humans is creativity and critical thinking.

Leon Abboud

130,423 次观看 • 16 天前

People still don't understand how good Codex has become 👀 I asked it to build this Starbucks website and within some 30 minutes it generated this without me touching a single line of code or spending time looking for assets either. Imagen generated every visual and GPT hooked everything into the codebase. After a couple of small tweaks it all just worked. It didn't even use half of my Codex session. It's super surprising to see quality of the assets. Was way better than I expected. That made me think about what AI is actually changing. Being a developer or a designer was never just about doing the work, writing code or designing it using some kind of tool. It was about knowing what to build in the first place. AI is getting incredibly good at the doing. The hard part is still having good ideas, making the right decisions, and knowing when something feels right. That is only getting more valuable. The people who win won't be the ones writing the most code. They'll be the ones with the best ideas who know how to turn them into reality with AI. Live: Code:

People still don't understand how good Codex has become 👀 I asked it to build this Starbucks website and within some 30 minutes it generated this without me touching a single line of code or spending time looking for assets either. Imagen generated every visual and GPT hooked everything into the codebase. After a couple of small tweaks it all just worked. It didn't even use half of my Codex session. It's super surprising to see quality of the assets. Was way better than I expected. That made me think about what AI is actually changing. Being a developer or a designer was never just about doing the work, writing code or designing it using some kind of tool. It was about knowing what to build in the first place. AI is getting incredibly good at the doing. The hard part is still having good ideas, making the right decisions, and knowing when something feels right. That is only getting more valuable. The people who win won't be the ones writing the most code. They'll be the ones with the best ideas who know how to turn them into reality with AI. Live: Code:

The Bugged Dev

60,699 次观看 • 3 个月前

everyone's sharing motion graphic videos that Opus 5.5 made, and it's genuinely insane everyone says they created it with "one prompt", but my one prompt video looked mid so i went through a bunch of these videos to see how they were actually made, and found the workflow that works here's how to generate pro level motion graphic videos w/ opus: 1. get reference videos to direct from -> pick 1-2 videos whose style you want and tell opus to match them. naming a style works way better than describing one without a reference, opus falls back to its default look: centered text, gradient background, everything fading in that's why so many of these videos look the same. a reference gives it the pacing, the type and the transitions to copy 2. install HyperFrames or Remotion so opus can build the video both let opus write every scene as code and render it straight to mp4. no video editor without one, opus can only describe a video or hand you a rough html page you have to screen record with it, every frame is exact, and when you ask for a change it edits one line and re-renders instead of starting over 3. install 21st for high quality components in the video real buttons, cards and UI components made by design engineers, instead of whatever opus invents on the spot without it, opus draws your product UI from scratch and it looks off. wrong spacing, placeholder boxes, fake-looking buttons anyone who's used good software can feel it in a second, and the whole video reads as cheap 4. steps 1-3 were context + setup. now dump all of it into opus your brand (logo, colors, fonts), screenshots of your real product, the reference video, and a quick braindump of how you see the video then ask for 3 storyboard variants without this, opus guesses your colors, your font and what your product even does. the video could be for any startup with it, it could only be yours. and 3 variants means you pick a direction instead of fixing the first idea it had 5. pick the storyboard you like ask for one still frame per scene before anything moves. fixing a storyboard is way cheaper than fixing a render without this step, you only find out scene 4 is wrong after the whole thing is animated, and every fix means re-rendering. a still frame takes seconds to change 6. let claude cook then give notes like a director: "slow every zoom to 0.7x", "hard cut here", "push in on the button" without notes, the first render is usually 80% there, and that last 20% is what makes it look pro. vague notes like "make it better" get random changes. camera words get exactly the change you want everyone has the same model. the context you give it is what makes it look pro let it cooookk

Rexan Wong

632,836 次观看 • 15 天前

Meet shopdev, your AI developer for Shopify Prompt, edit, and deploy custom Shopify themes in minutes with the power of AI. Comment ‘shopdev’ for early access! -- Why are we building this? Building Shopify themes used to take months. Now it takes days with Instant. But we’re not done yet. eCommerce is complex, and custom code has long been the standard for building Shopify themes. - What if it were available for everyone, not just developers? - What if you could build it in minutes, instead of weeks? That’s why we’ve built shopdev[.]ai We’ve been exploring the LLM space for a while now to discover how we can make it easier and faster for everyone to build custom shopify stores. Today we’ve found the perfect solution. Join the waitlist and you’ll be the first to try it out.

Meet shopdev, your AI developer for Shopify Prompt, edit, and deploy custom Shopify themes in minutes with the power of AI. Comment ‘shopdev’ for early access! -- Why are we building this? Building Shopify themes used to take months. Now it takes days with Instant. But we’re not done yet. eCommerce is complex, and custom code has long been the standard for building Shopify themes. - What if it were available for everyone, not just developers? - What if you could build it in minutes, instead of weeks? That’s why we’ve built shopdev[.]ai We’ve been exploring the LLM space for a while now to discover how we can make it easier and faster for everyone to build custom shopify stores. Today we’ve found the perfect solution. Join the waitlist and you’ll be the first to try it out.

Coen van Hees

49,610 次观看 • 1 年前

I always wondered "What if I port my three.js game to Rust? Will it improve performance?" I finally ported it to both Rust Desktop and Rust WASM (that runs on the browser) Comparing the three.js version with the Rust desktop I had a clear winner: Rust desktop. But now I took the time to port it to the web using Web Assembly (WASM) And my conclusion is... A tie! Both versions averaged 42FPS (60FPS if running one at a time) So if your goal is to ship a web game, it doesn't even matter the tech you use. (Three.js is recommended because the ecossystem is huge though) As long you optmize well (Web workers, reduce triangles, draw calls, etc) you should be good to go. But in the event you want to ship a native game to publish on Steam a system language (Rust, C++, etc) will be better for you. Now I want to port the three.js game to Desktop using Electron and see the results. I'll let you know. Btw, I'm open to new freelance projects. If you have anything for me, my DMs are open!

I always wondered "What if I port my three.js game to Rust? Will it improve performance?" I finally ported it to both Rust Desktop and Rust WASM (that runs on the browser) Comparing the three.js version with the Rust desktop I had a clear winner: Rust desktop. But now I took the time to port it to the web using Web Assembly (WASM) And my conclusion is... A tie! Both versions averaged 42FPS (60FPS if running one at a time) So if your goal is to ship a web game, it doesn't even matter the tech you use. (Three.js is recommended because the ecossystem is huge though) As long you optmize well (Web workers, reduce triangles, draw calls, etc) you should be good to go. But in the event you want to ship a native game to publish on Steam a system language (Rust, C++, etc) will be better for you. Now I want to port the three.js game to Desktop using Electron and see the results. I'll let you know. Btw, I'm open to new freelance projects. If you have anything for me, my DMs are open!

André → andreelias.dev

19,531 次观看 • 4 个月前

Someone built an AI you power with a hand crank it is called CrankGPT and its running without any battery, internet or data centre just you turning a handle like it is 1900 SqueezLabs built it using a Raspberry Pi 5 with 8GB of RAM an audio card and a 20 watt hand crank generator it takes about 30 seconds of cranking to boot into a working voice assistant and the onboard capacitor gives you roughly 20 seconds of runtime before you have to start cranking again they have used it to generate small images even write code 🤯 this proves you can run a real AI model on almost no power while everyone is building billion dollar data centres two guys put AI in a box

Someone built an AI you power with a hand crank it is called CrankGPT and its running without any battery, internet or data centre just you turning a handle like it is 1900 SqueezLabs built it using a Raspberry Pi 5 with 8GB of RAM an audio card and a 20 watt hand crank generator it takes about 30 seconds of cranking to boot into a working voice assistant and the onboard capacitor gives you roughly 20 seconds of runtime before you have to start cranking again they have used it to generate small images even write code 🤯 this proves you can run a real AI model on almost no power while everyone is building billion dollar data centres two guys put AI in a box

Sweep

11,610 次观看 • 3 个月前

📣 I'M LOOKING FOR A NEW CHALLENGE 👨🏼‍🎨 I'm a senior designer looking to join a team that is doing generation runs for the world and the future of it. I've got 10+ years worth of chops in design, from brand to web, social media to motion, and now these days toying around with AI as well. I know what I'm worth and what I'm capable of producing, and I want to help a company or organzation who is committed to the future of humanity and doing life-changing work and come alongside and rise to the call. If you know anyone who is looking, please put me in touch with them. ✌️❤️ Love Alex, a designer forever

Alexis Presa

20,047 次观看 • 2 个月前

MiniMax is the James Bond of AI agents. It uses the world's first open-weight model (MiniMax-M1), and it squeezes every bit of power from it. The agent takes a prompt and does more than any other agent in the market right now: 1. It can do Deep Research 2. It can write code 3. It can design web pages 4. It can build 3D models I built 5 different experiences using MiniMax and recorded them for you:

MiniMax is the James Bond of AI agents. It uses the world's first open-weight model (MiniMax-M1), and it squeezes every bit of power from it. The agent takes a prompt and does more than any other agent in the market right now: 1. It can do Deep Research 2. It can write code 3. It can design web pages 4. It can build 3D models I built 5 different experiences using MiniMax and recorded them for you:

Santiago

44,730 次观看 • 1 年前

I know a lot of people hate on AI. I get it. Be creative. But for those of use who can't draw or animate, this is more of a quick and cheap fix. and there's nothing wrong with that. I wish others were more open about sharing what they've learned using AI and not hoard their knowledge like it's worth gold. The only way we can learn and improve is if others share what they've learned. I understand people are protective of what prompts they use. Ok fine, don't share them. But you can't even give a tip? Like "add this phrase to the prompt for better [fill in the blank]" or "use [blank] for a more realistic atmosphere]. Just pisses me off. I'm happy to share all I've learned with anyone who askes. Same happened in the 3d printing community with crushable printed houses. No one wanted to share anything. So I gave up on that. #sizetwitter #giantess #AIart #giantessai #Sora2 #soraArt

I know a lot of people hate on AI. I get it. Be creative. But for those of use who can't draw or animate, this is more of a quick and cheap fix. and there's nothing wrong with that. I wish others were more open about sharing what they've learned using AI and not hoard their knowledge like it's worth gold. The only way we can learn and improve is if others share what they've learned. I understand people are protective of what prompts they use. Ok fine, don't share them. But you can't even give a tip? Like "add this phrase to the prompt for better [fill in the blank]" or "use [blank] for a more realistic atmosphere]. Just pisses me off. I'm happy to share all I've learned with anyone who askes. Same happened in the 3d printing community with crushable printed houses. No one wanted to share anything. So I gave up on that. #sizetwitter #giantess #AIart #giantessai #Sora2 #soraArt

Carly {Amazingly Unavoidable}

15,174 次观看 • 1 年前

🧮 Math v0.1.0 is out now! 🧮 We asked and Opus one shot... just kidding. Our resident expert isaacmason hand crafted the playful web's most optimized math engine. → allocation-free, monomorphic and benchmarked for speed → tiny and tree-shakable, only pay for what you use → works with webgl, webgpu, wasm or your favourite renderer → data-oriented design for the fastest possible code Includes a skill for juicing up your agent. Just /math and it will produce optimized algorithms for you. This should be an easy addition to any creative dev project. And the best part? 'npm i math'

🧮 Math v0.1.0 is out now! 🧮 We asked and Opus one shot... just kidding. Our resident expert isaacmason hand crafted the playful web's most optimized math engine. → allocation-free, monomorphic and benchmarked for speed → tiny and tree-shakable, only pay for what you use → works with webgl, webgpu, wasm or your favourite renderer → data-oriented design for the fastest possible code Includes a skill for juicing up your agent. Just /math and it will produce optimized algorithms for you. This should be an easy addition to any creative dev project. And the best part? 'npm i math'

Poimandres

84,007 次观看 • 16 天前

I'm very proud to launch and introduce my design studio: Antitype. I've been convinced for several years that design will be the work of my life, and this studio is the starting point. A few days ago, a well-known designer publicly announced he was quitting design, overwhelmed by what AI is now capable of producing. A lot of designers share that feeling right now. I don't share it at all. I actually believe it's never been more important to create, to innovate on your product, your interfaces, your art direction. Differentiation has become key for ambitious companies looking to escape the standardisation that AI can generate. That's exactly what Antitype is built on: turning brand and product into a competitive advantage for those who want to stand out. This studio is a solid foundation for what I want to build long-term, and I'm really excited to share it with you!

Sébastien Deconinck

16,858 次观看 • 2 个月前

$Fable 5 built this real-time ocean scene directly in the browser using Three.js, WebGPU and TSL, with no engine and no baked assets. The interesting part is not just that the water looks good. The whole system is being simulated: wave spectrum, GPU FFT, foam generation and refracted-ray caustics, all running live. This is exactly where frontier models start becoming genuinely useful for technical graphics work. Not by replacing years of rendering research, but by compressing the path from complex math to a working interactive result. A small, focused scene, but technically very serious. Cc: Adem Vessell$

Fable 5 built this real-time ocean scene directly in the browser using Three.js, WebGPU and TSL, with no engine and no baked assets. The interesting part is not just that the water looks good. The whole system is being simulated: wave spectrum, GPU FFT, foam generation and refracted-ray caustics, all running live. This is exactly where frontier models start becoming genuinely useful for technical graphics work. Not by replacing years of rendering research, but by compressing the path from complex math to a working interactive result. A small, focused scene, but technically very serious. Cc: Adem Vessell

Token Gremlin

21,731 次观看 • 3 个月前

claude fable 5 is live. spawn 5.0 was built with it: 1,687 prompts, 102 sessions, my job shifted from architecture to judging taste. what we built, each of which would've been at least a month with a whole team on opus: — a from-scratch physics engine (mantle) that rivals rapier, testable in a day as a side thread — clustered froxel lighting: 8 lights to 1,000+ fully dynamic ("it's stupid fast" — creator of threejs) — realtime diffuse GI on webgpu, on your phone (landing in the next update) — million-particle gpu vfx with a shader architecture beyond what unreal and unity ship — mmo-scale netcode plus, for good measure: an (alpha) native ios app. all of it in about a week. all of it running on mobile. and the list doesn't include half of what we shipped — full changelog in the thread below. and the part the benchmarks won't show you: this model has a wonderful personality. it's genuinely funny. i laughed so hard i cried multiple times, mid-physics-rewrite. the genius and the character aren't separate features.

claude fable 5 is live. spawn 5.0 was built with it: 1,687 prompts, 102 sessions, my job shifted from architecture to judging taste. what we built, each of which would've been at least a month with a whole team on opus: — a from-scratch physics engine (mantle) that rivals rapier, testable in a day as a side thread — clustered froxel lighting: 8 lights to 1,000+ fully dynamic ("it's stupid fast" — creator of threejs) — realtime diffuse GI on webgpu, on your phone (landing in the next update) — million-particle gpu vfx with a shader architecture beyond what unreal and unity ship — mmo-scale netcode plus, for good measure: an (alpha) native ios app. all of it in about a week. all of it running on mobile. and the list doesn't include half of what we shipped — full changelog in the thread below. and the part the benchmarks won't show you: this model has a wonderful personality. it's genuinely funny. i laughed so hard i cried multiple times, mid-physics-rewrite. the genius and the character aren't separate features.

jacob

55,515 次观看 • 4 个月前

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Dev Ed

660,154 次观看 • 7 个月前