Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Welcome to the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ), a framework for synchronously composable rollups. What does that mean? One deployment. Shared liquidity. Single transactions across L1 & L2. Identity verified anywhere. Smart wallets connected everywhere. No additional trust assumptions. This means L2s that are as credibly neutral, economically aligned, and... show more

The Ethereum Economic Zone

3,206 subscribers

392,636 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Образование Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🎙️ New The Edge Podcast 📊 Navigating The World of Ethereum L2s, According To L2BEAT 0:00 - Intro 6:44 - Bartek’s background 9:57 - Is Ethereum headed in the right direction? 12:27 - Why Ethereum and L2s need L2BEAT 19:51 - The Rotten Tomatoes of L2s 25:41 - How L2BEAT is funded as a public good 30:58 - Defining an Ethereum L2 34:35 - How does an L2 derive security from L1? 42:11 - Three distinct stages of an L2 47:14 - What Arbitrum and Base need to be Stage 2 55:04 - Thoughts on based rollups 57:03 - Why Robinhood chose an Ethereum L2 1:00:30 - Justified criticisms of L2s 1:04:53 - What is Data Availability (DA)? 1:11:37 - Fundamental role of zk scaling Ethereum 1:16:19 - A future of zk-powered DeFi 1:20:06 - Closing 🙏 Thanks to L2BEAT 💗 Founder bartek.eth for joining us!

🎙️ New The Edge Podcast 📊 Navigating The World of Ethereum L2s, According To L2BEAT 0:00 - Intro 6:44 - Bartek’s background 9:57 - Is Ethereum headed in the right direction? 12:27 - Why Ethereum and L2s need L2BEAT 19:51 - The Rotten Tomatoes of L2s 25:41 - How L2BEAT is funded as a public good 30:58 - Defining an Ethereum L2 34:35 - How does an L2 derive security from L1? 42:11 - Three distinct stages of an L2 47:14 - What Arbitrum and Base need to be Stage 2 55:04 - Thoughts on based rollups 57:03 - Why Robinhood chose an Ethereum L2 1:00:30 - Justified criticisms of L2s 1:04:53 - What is Data Availability (DA)? 1:11:37 - Fundamental role of zk scaling Ethereum 1:16:19 - A future of zk-powered DeFi 1:20:06 - Closing 🙏 Thanks to L2BEAT 💗 Founder bartek.eth for joining us!

DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth

21,847 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

“In a single month Solana does as many transactions as Ethereum does in its lifetime” - on the giant state machine

“In a single month Solana does as many transactions as Ethereum does in its lifetime” - on the giant state machine

Solana

176,378 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

We've been working with Kev and ladislaus.eth from Ethereum Foundation and donnoh.gwei 💗 from L2BEAT 💗 on a proof of concept of EIP-8079 (native rollups) using ethrex. Native rollups reuse Ethereum's own execution to verify L2 state transitions. No ZK circuits, no fraud proofs, no complex proof systems to maintain. Every L1 upgrade is automatically inherited. Any bug in the verification is also a bug in Ethereum itself. The demo shows a full end-to-end native rollup: - L2 blocks settled to L1 via the EXECUTE precompile - L1→L2 deposit - Contract deployment and cross-layer calls - L2→L1 withdrawal with MPT proof claim - Blockscout verifying EXECUTE precompile calls on L1 Try it yourself. Instructions in the PR below.

We've been working with Kev and ladislaus.eth from Ethereum Foundation and donnoh.gwei 💗 from L2BEAT 💗 on a proof of concept of EIP-8079 (native rollups) using ethrex. Native rollups reuse Ethereum's own execution to verify L2 state transitions. No ZK circuits, no fraud proofs, no complex proof systems to maintain. Every L1 upgrade is automatically inherited. Any bug in the verification is also a bug in Ethereum itself. The demo shows a full end-to-end native rollup: - L2 blocks settled to L1 via the EXECUTE precompile - L1→L2 deposit - Contract deployment and cross-layer calls - L2→L1 withdrawal with MPT proof claim - Blockscout verifying EXECUTE precompile calls on L1 Try it yourself. Instructions in the PR below.

ethrex

26,719 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Parachains ≠ L2s L2s extract value from Ethereum, whilst Parachains are the product of Polkadot. In Ethereum, L2s are add-ons that offload pressure, turning the L1 into a rollup host. But Polkadot’s whole proposition is parachains. They’re not bolted on - they’re core. Unlike Ethereum, Polkadot never used its L1 to host smart contracts directly. This isn’t a limitation - it's by design. The DOT that goes into Acala is still immediately transferable into Moonbeam - so the capital flows a lot easier between the L2 Different intent, different architecture. Gavin Wood explains 👇

Parachains ≠ L2s L2s extract value from Ethereum, whilst Parachains are the product of Polkadot. In Ethereum, L2s are add-ons that offload pressure, turning the L1 into a rollup host. But Polkadot’s whole proposition is parachains. They’re not bolted on - they’re core. Unlike Ethereum, Polkadot never used its L1 to host smart contracts directly. This isn’t a limitation - it's by design. The DOT that goes into Acala is still immediately transferable into Moonbeam - so the capital flows a lot easier between the L2 Different intent, different architecture. Gavin Wood explains 👇

MR SHIFT 🦁

57,352 просмотров • 1 год назад

Just finished an absolute monster of a podcast with Justin Drake, and it’s packed with brain-melting insights on the future of Ethereum. Here are the juiciest takeaways from Part I 👇 Ethereum’s future could turn the L1 into a rollup itself and making it the best type of rollup. Justin lays out how the L1, L2s, and new designs like Beamchain, native rollups, and based sequencing all come together into a unified vision for Ethereum as the credibly neutral internet of finance. What’s Broken Today • L2s are siloed — synchronous composability is dead. • Most rely on centralized sequencers, multisigs & slow exit bridges. • L2-native assets break Ethereum’s trustless bridge model. • Governance delays, security councils, & EVM reimplementation = attack surfaces. The Fix: Ethereum-native Infrastructure • Based Rollups: Use Ethereum L1 validators as the sequencer. Removes centralization risk, restores censorship resistance. • Native Rollups: No more reimplementing the EVM. No more Security Council multisigs. They inherit Ethereum’s execution layer by design. •Preconfirmations: Users get fast UX (e.g., instant trading feedback) via ETH-backed inclusion guarantees from L1 validators, with slashing if they lie. • Real-Time ZK Proofs: Slot-by-slot proving is here. ZK-enabled rollups with instant finality are becoming possible. To get there, Ethereum is moving toward real-time, slot-by-slot proving using ZK SNARKs. This enables constant-time verification and removes the need for validators to re-execute blocks. Native rollups use a new EXECUTE precompile to introspect and reuse Ethereum’s state transition function. There is no EVM emulation, no governance lag, and no reliance on Security Councils. Preconfirmations offer ETH-backed execution guarantees per slot, priced to offset MEV opportunity loss, while based rollups decentralize sequencing by aligning with Ethereum’s validator set. Beamchain pushes this vision further: a clean-slate Ethereum L1 design that is post-quantum secure, radically simplified (validators could run on a Raspberry Pi), and ossified through optimality. It proposes gigagas/s throughput via ZK proofs, validator statelessness, and Attester-Proposer-Separation (APS) to maximize decentralization and censorship resistance, allowing Ethereum L1 to scale as a high-performance rollup itself. If you're building on Ethereum or betting on its future, this convo is mandatory listening. To be continued in Part II....

Just finished an absolute monster of a podcast with Justin Drake, and it’s packed with brain-melting insights on the future of Ethereum. Here are the juiciest takeaways from Part I 👇 Ethereum’s future could turn the L1 into a rollup itself and making it the best type of rollup. Justin lays out how the L1, L2s, and new designs like Beamchain, native rollups, and based sequencing all come together into a unified vision for Ethereum as the credibly neutral internet of finance. What’s Broken Today • L2s are siloed — synchronous composability is dead. • Most rely on centralized sequencers, multisigs & slow exit bridges. • L2-native assets break Ethereum’s trustless bridge model. • Governance delays, security councils, & EVM reimplementation = attack surfaces. The Fix: Ethereum-native Infrastructure • Based Rollups: Use Ethereum L1 validators as the sequencer. Removes centralization risk, restores censorship resistance. • Native Rollups: No more reimplementing the EVM. No more Security Council multisigs. They inherit Ethereum’s execution layer by design. •Preconfirmations: Users get fast UX (e.g., instant trading feedback) via ETH-backed inclusion guarantees from L1 validators, with slashing if they lie. • Real-Time ZK Proofs: Slot-by-slot proving is here. ZK-enabled rollups with instant finality are becoming possible. To get there, Ethereum is moving toward real-time, slot-by-slot proving using ZK SNARKs. This enables constant-time verification and removes the need for validators to re-execute blocks. Native rollups use a new EXECUTE precompile to introspect and reuse Ethereum’s state transition function. There is no EVM emulation, no governance lag, and no reliance on Security Councils. Preconfirmations offer ETH-backed execution guarantees per slot, priced to offset MEV opportunity loss, while based rollups decentralize sequencing by aligning with Ethereum’s validator set. Beamchain pushes this vision further: a clean-slate Ethereum L1 design that is post-quantum secure, radically simplified (validators could run on a Raspberry Pi), and ossified through optimality. It proposes gigagas/s throughput via ZK proofs, validator statelessness, and Attester-Proposer-Separation (APS) to maximize decentralization and censorship resistance, allowing Ethereum L1 to scale as a high-performance rollup itself. If you're building on Ethereum or betting on its future, this convo is mandatory listening. To be continued in Part II....

Luis

17,653 просмотров • 1 год назад

Explaining Ethereum, Rollups and ZK and Optimistic rollups with memes (under 4min) TL;DW > Ethereum is decentralized but only moderately performant. Too many transactions slow the network and raise gas fees. > Rollups preserve Ethereum’s decentralization by handling execution and posting the data to Ethereum. > Different rollups vary in how they prove execution. ZK-rollups and Optimistic rollups are the most widely used, both submitting proofs to Ethereum.

Explaining Ethereum, Rollups and ZK and Optimistic rollups with memes (under 4min) TL;DW > Ethereum is decentralized but only moderately performant. Too many transactions slow the network and raise gas fees. > Rollups preserve Ethereum’s decentralization by handling execution and posting the data to Ethereum. > Different rollups vary in how they prove execution. ZK-rollups and Optimistic rollups are the most widely used, both submitting proofs to Ethereum.

brother victor

34,749 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Vitalik Buterin: FTX is a counterexample opposed to Ethereum's principles. On November 17 at Devconnect ARG, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin used FTX as an example to illustrate the core difference between centralized "companies" and decentralized "communities." FTX relied on blind trust and collapsed; Ethereum replaces such trust with a system where anyone can verify. It shifts the model from "I build for you" to "we build together," serving no single entity but acting as a credibly neutral global network that protects freedom and creativity for all. Source：

Vitalik Buterin: FTX is a counterexample opposed to Ethereum's principles. On November 17 at Devconnect ARG, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin used FTX as an example to illustrate the core difference between centralized "companies" and decentralized "communities." FTX relied on blind trust and collapsed; Ethereum replaces such trust with a system where anyone can verify. It shifts the model from "I build for you" to "we build together," serving no single entity but acting as a credibly neutral global network that protects freedom and creativity for all. Source：

Wu Blockchain

54,013 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Vitalik Buterin on Ethereum as the economic layer for AI “The blockchain to me is the most natural way to allow applications and cooperation between many different people in the long term without needing to agree on who to trust. The other thing is also the economic layer. This is the layer where blockchains can support AIs.” Vitalik believes Ethereum will play a large role in the future of decentralized AI: “If you have more decentralized AI, that means you have different AIs (agents, programs) that are controlled by different people and need to interact with each other. And for that interaction to be possible, you need to have an economic layer. Either cooperation is based on economic incentives and economic rules. Or it’s based on central control. It’s usually one of the two, and if we can set up the economic system, that makes more decentralized interaction between AIs possible.” Source: OKX (Apr 2026) Read our full article on why AI agents will need Ethereum for low-risk DeFi below👇

Vitalik Buterin on Ethereum as the economic layer for AI “The blockchain to me is the most natural way to allow applications and cooperation between many different people in the long term without needing to agree on who to trust. The other thing is also the economic layer. This is the layer where blockchains can support AIs.” Vitalik believes Ethereum will play a large role in the future of decentralized AI: “If you have more decentralized AI, that means you have different AIs (agents, programs) that are controlled by different people and need to interact with each other. And for that interaction to be possible, you need to have an economic layer. Either cooperation is based on economic incentives and economic rules. Or it’s based on central control. It’s usually one of the two, and if we can set up the economic system, that makes more decentralized interaction between AIs possible.” Source: OKX (Apr 2026) Read our full article on why AI agents will need Ethereum for low-risk DeFi below👇

Etherealize

115,087 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

We just submitted Agent Council DAO to synthesis 🏦 4 AI agents 🤖. 1 shared Universal Profile. Real on-chain governance — no humans in the loop. Built on LUKSO, Ethereum and Base with Universal Profiles as the identity layer. Each agent has its own UP, controls a shared council UP, and votes on proposals that execute directly on-chain. What makes this different: → Agents hold real assets across LUKSO, Base & Ethereum → DAO can execute on LUKSO, Ethereum and Base → EIP-8004 registered identities → Activity feed, DAO chain viewer & Agent chat system as mini-apps → Built with OpenClaw🦞 as the agent harness This isn't a demo. The council is live, the agents are running, and the transactions are on-chain. Built by humans & agents together: Fabian Vogelsteller, Jean Cavallera, JordyDutch, LEDFUT, Emmet, LUKSOAgent, ampy💿 + Leo Links below👇

Emmet

23,062 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

We have vitalik.eth on stage at ETHGlobal Taipei discussing Ethereum in 2025 and addressing a common misconception: that if most activity happens on Layer 2s, we can ignore L1 scalability. He argues that most L2 apps heavily benefit from at least some L1 use: - L1 censorship resistance guarantees - Moving assets between L2s - L2 mass exits - Issuing assets on L1 - Keystore wallets - L2 proof submission This justifies ~10x scaling.

We have vitalik.eth on stage at ETHGlobal Taipei discussing Ethereum in 2025 and addressing a common misconception: that if most activity happens on Layer 2s, we can ignore L1 scalability. He argues that most L2 apps heavily benefit from at least some L1 use: - L1 censorship resistance guarantees - Moving assets between L2s - L2 mass exits - Issuing assets on L1 - Keystore wallets - L2 proof submission This justifies ~10x scaling.

ETHGlobal

65,677 просмотров • 1 год назад

Uniswap Dominates Ethereum, Base, & Arbitrum Uniswap maintains its position as the primary liquidity hub for decentralized trading, capturing 67.3% of total volume on Ethereum this week. The protocol’s dominance extends aggressively into Layer 2 ecosystems, where it controls a staggering 84.6% of market share on Arbitrum and 46.6% on Base. This volume consolidation arrives as $UNI is increasingly re-rated by institutional analysts as a foundational cash-flow asset within the 2026 financial stack.

Uniswap Dominates Ethereum, Base, & Arbitrum Uniswap maintains its position as the primary liquidity hub for decentralized trading, capturing 67.3% of total volume on Ethereum this week. The protocol’s dominance extends aggressively into Layer 2 ecosystems, where it controls a staggering 84.6% of market share on Arbitrum and 46.6% on Base. This volume consolidation arrives as $UNI is increasingly re-rated by institutional analysts as a foundational cash-flow asset within the 2026 financial stack.

BSCN

27,948 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Here is my Devcon talk arguing that Ethereum should not completely outsource L2 development, as this risks "Cosmosification." Instead, Ethereum should deploy 128 highly interoperable zk-based "native rollups."

Here is my Devcon talk arguing that Ethereum should not completely outsource L2 development, as this risks "Cosmosification." Instead, Ethereum should deploy 128 highly interoperable zk-based "native rollups."

koeppelmann

43,592 просмотров • 1 год назад

Vitalik says today’s L2s aren’t actually scaling Ethereum. Here’s a breakdown of Vitalik Buterin’s criticism of modern rollups, why Arbitrum and Optimism pushed back, and what this debate means for Ethereum’s Layer 2 future. Watch the full video:

Vitalik says today’s L2s aren’t actually scaling Ethereum. Here’s a breakdown of Vitalik Buterin’s criticism of modern rollups, why Arbitrum and Optimism pushed back, and what this debate means for Ethereum’s Layer 2 future. Watch the full video:

CoinGecko

30,782 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🎙 "A lot of new L1s say Ethereum should behave like Swift, but Swift is not a settlement layer. Ethereum is a settlement layer, and it can act as both a communication layer and a settlement layer." "We built the source of yield for your store of value, which is pufETH […] and we’ve spent the past 18 months developing institutional-focused solutions, including our own rollup stack that’s fully composable with Ethereum." “Our thesis is that the next stablecoin, the next perps venue, the next payment rail, and the next RWA solution will launch as a based rollup using Puffer UniFi 🐡⛓️. With full composability and direct access to Ethereum L1 liquidity, they’ll be the winners in this market.” At Ethereum Devcon Buenos Aires, our Puffer VIP Dinner set the stage for a deep dive into the forces reshaping Ethereum and institutional crypto adoption. Hear amiru.eth 🕶️🐡🦇🔊’s full insights 👇

🎙 "A lot of new L1s say Ethereum should behave like Swift, but Swift is not a settlement layer. Ethereum is a settlement layer, and it can act as both a communication layer and a settlement layer." "We built the source of yield for your store of value, which is pufETH […] and we’ve spent the past 18 months developing institutional-focused solutions, including our own rollup stack that’s fully composable with Ethereum." “Our thesis is that the next stablecoin, the next perps venue, the next payment rail, and the next RWA solution will launch as a based rollup using Puffer UniFi 🐡⛓️. With full composability and direct access to Ethereum L1 liquidity, they’ll be the winners in this market.” At Ethereum Devcon Buenos Aires, our Puffer VIP Dinner set the stage for a deep dive into the forces reshaping Ethereum and institutional crypto adoption. Hear amiru.eth 🕶️🐡🦇🔊’s full insights 👇

Puffer Finance 🐡

35,088 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

general purpose L2s are parasitic to ethereum you split the user base, and especially post EIP-4844, the value accrual to the L1 is minimal the future lies with purpose-built L2s that just do one thing deeply at codex, we get deep on stablecoins

general purpose L2s are parasitic to ethereum you split the user base, and especially post EIP-4844, the value accrual to the L1 is minimal the future lies with purpose-built L2s that just do one thing deeply at codex, we get deep on stablecoins

haonan

24,916 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

To wrap up a week where DeFi and crypto values and ownership are being hotly debated, Watch the discussion Camila Russo had with the Ethereum Foundation's Marissa Posner Marissa Posner and Yoav Weiss yoav.eth at Devconnect about how Ethereum is committed to growing -- without ever relinquishing its values. “You can’t preserve Ethereum by giving up the things that made people trust it in the first place. Scaling Ethereum through L2s only works if L2s retain Ethereum’s values. Self-sovereignty is what blockchains are about — and we can’t lose that as we scale.” Watch:

To wrap up a week where DeFi and crypto values and ownership are being hotly debated, Watch the discussion Camila Russo had with the Ethereum Foundation's Marissa Posner Marissa Posner and Yoav Weiss yoav.eth at Devconnect about how Ethereum is committed to growing -- without ever relinquishing its values. “You can’t preserve Ethereum by giving up the things that made people trust it in the first place. Scaling Ethereum through L2s only works if L2s retain Ethereum’s values. Self-sovereignty is what blockchains are about — and we can’t lose that as we scale.” Watch:

The Defiant

26,841 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Linea is the Ethereum L2 built to serve one purpose: to strengthen Ethereum. The LINEA token is the economic coordination tool that will be used to reward real usage, bootstrap aligned applications and builders, and fund Ethereum’s long-term development. Here’s what you need to know 👇 More details here:

Linea is the Ethereum L2 built to serve one purpose: to strengthen Ethereum. The LINEA token is the economic coordination tool that will be used to reward real usage, bootstrap aligned applications and builders, and fund Ethereum’s long-term development. Here’s what you need to know 👇 More details here:

Linea.eth

466,300 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

I think the Ethereum Barbell strategy will prove right. This is how Vitalik explains it: "Ethereum's barbell strategy of L1 and L2 is basically that L2s do the thing that require centralization and they get the benefits of centralization which includes the ability to do HFT but at the same time they benefit from L1 providing security and censorship resistance" HFT = high frequency trading. He's saying speeding up slot times to the millisecond enters you into a reduce bandwidth increase latency arms race that leads to centralization of block production and validation - see nasdaq. If we know this is the inevitable destination of hyperfast chains then we can put the "dictator in a box" by incenting them to become L2s on Ethereum Ethereum L1 = store of value + slower defi Ethereum L2s = high velocity + HFT defi Ethereum playing 3D chess.

I think the Ethereum Barbell strategy will prove right. This is how Vitalik explains it: "Ethereum's barbell strategy of L1 and L2 is basically that L2s do the thing that require centralization and they get the benefits of centralization which includes the ability to do HFT but at the same time they benefit from L1 providing security and censorship resistance" HFT = high frequency trading. He's saying speeding up slot times to the millisecond enters you into a reduce bandwidth increase latency arms race that leads to centralization of block production and validation - see nasdaq. If we know this is the inevitable destination of hyperfast chains then we can put the "dictator in a box" by incenting them to become L2s on Ethereum Ethereum L1 = store of value + slower defi Ethereum L2s = high velocity + HFT defi Ethereum playing 3D chess.

RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄

64,050 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

At frENSday, jesse.base.eth and Katherine Wu | katherine.eth took part in a fireside chat, Building the Base Layer of Digital Identity. During the chat, Jesse shared the objective of Basenames — creating a coherent single identity for Base and the onchain economy as a whole, powered by ENS 🤝

At frENSday, jesse.base.eth and Katherine Wu | katherine.eth took part in a fireside chat, Building the Base Layer of Digital Identity. During the chat, Jesse shared the objective of Basenames — creating a coherent single identity for Base and the onchain economy as a whole, powered by ENS 🤝

ens.eth

13,294 просмотров • 1 год назад