正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

We’re excited to add support for Opus 4.6. With adaptive thinking, Opus 4.6 will decide the right amount of reasoning for your query, reducing latency and improving quality. Internally, we've already resolved bugs that Opus 4.5 couldn't tackle. Try it out on the latest!

Warp

57,345 subscribers

12,404 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Claude Opus 4.6 is available for all users in Orchids right now! Tag Orchids with any app idea and we’ll give you 100k in free credits to test it out. Comparisons to Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-Codex, Gemini 3 Flash, and Kimi K2.5 👇 Prompt: Make me an interactive, 3d model of the solar system.

Claude Opus 4.6 is available for all users in Orchids right now! Tag Orchids with any app idea and we’ll give you 100k in free credits to test it out. Comparisons to Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-Codex, Gemini 3 Flash, and Kimi K2.5 👇 Prompt: Make me an interactive, 3d model of the solar system.

Orchids

22,774 次观看 • 5 个月前

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

Tibor Blaho

29,794 次观看 • 5 个月前

You can now ask Comet to browse for you with the new "Control browser" mode. Available now for Pro and Max subscribers. We've also updated the default browser agent model to Opus 4.6 for Max subscribers.

You can now ask Comet to browse for you with the new "Control browser" mode. Available now for Pro and Max subscribers. We've also updated the default browser agent model to Opus 4.6 for Max subscribers.

Comet

88,126 次观看 • 5 个月前

To make it easier to migrate your workflows, we've updated the claude-api skill in Claude Code with Opus 4.7 support. Just say "migrate to Opus 4.7" and it updates model names, prompts, and effort settings for you.

To make it easier to migrate your workflows, we've updated the claude-api skill in Claude Code with Opus 4.7 support. Just say "migrate to Opus 4.7" and it updates model names, prompts, and effort settings for you.

ClaudeDevs

362,238 次观看 • 3 个月前

Announcing Built with Opus 4.6: a Claude Code virtual hackathon. Join the Claude Code team for a week of building. Winners will be hand-selected to win $100K in Claude API credits. Apply here:

Announcing Built with Opus 4.6: a Claude Code virtual hackathon. Join the Claude Code team for a week of building. Winners will be hand-selected to win $100K in Claude API credits. Apply here:

Claude

1,037,806 次观看 • 5 个月前

Claude Opus 4.6 is available for all users in Orchids right now! Tag Orchids with any app idea and we’ll give you 100k in free credits to test it out. Built a real-time flight tracker pulling actual flight data.

Claude Opus 4.6 is available for all users in Orchids right now! Tag Orchids with any app idea and we’ll give you 100k in free credits to test it out. Built a real-time flight tracker pulling actual flight data.

Kevin Lu

13,426 次观看 • 5 个月前

Opus 4.6 lets you set the effort level Not every task needs high reasoning. For simpler tasks you can set it to low or medium. Claude thinks less (or skips it entirely), makes fewer tool calls, and gives more concise answers Lower effort = faster responses with fewer tokens!

Opus 4.6 lets you set the effort level Not every task needs high reasoning. For simpler tasks you can set it to low or medium. Claude thinks less (or skips it entirely), makes fewer tool calls, and gives more concise answers Lower effort = faster responses with fewer tokens!

Lydia Hallie ✨

34,127 次观看 • 5 个月前

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Dev Ed

660,154 次观看 • 4 个月前

Grok 4.5 barely had time to enjoy first place. Grok 4.5 Medium just took the top spot on LaurenBench with 56.9%, beating Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 5, GLM 5.2 and GPT 5.6 on real world agent tasks. And Elon says Grok 4.6 arrives next week. Looks like Grok 4.5 won’t be in the spotlight for long. xAI Grok / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Grok 4.5 barely had time to enjoy first place. Grok 4.5 Medium just took the top spot on LaurenBench with 56.9%, beating Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 5, GLM 5.2 and GPT 5.6 on real world agent tasks. And Elon says Grok 4.6 arrives next week. Looks like Grok 4.5 won’t be in the spotlight for long. xAI Grok / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

39,492 次观看 • 1 天前

You can make $600K. With a bot that earns $83 every hour, 24/7, no days off, 365 days straight. By buying both sides of the same match on Polymarket and locking profit before the game even starts. > The bot buys YES and NO simultaneously on sports markets. > When combined price is below $1 - profit is locked instantly. > 7,877 trades. > $619K in 12 months. Check the wallet here: I reverse-engineered every trade and rebuilt the full logic in Claude Opus 4.6. The strategy, the math, both arb types, the exact 5-step bot architecture - all in the article. Feed it to your OpenClaw, let it spec the bot for Claude Opus 4.6, and you are set.

You can make $600K. With a bot that earns $83 every hour, 24/7, no days off, 365 days straight. By buying both sides of the same match on Polymarket and locking profit before the game even starts. > The bot buys YES and NO simultaneously on sports markets. > When combined price is below $1 - profit is locked instantly. > 7,877 trades. > $619K in 12 months. Check the wallet here: I reverse-engineered every trade and rebuilt the full logic in Claude Opus 4.6. The strategy, the math, both arb types, the exact 5-step bot architecture - all in the article. Feed it to your OpenClaw, let it spec the bot for Claude Opus 4.6, and you are set.

may.crypto {🦅}

998,611 次观看 • 5 个月前

Claude 3 Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku are now available as a base for you to build prompt bots with on Poe! These powerful multimodal models are the best in the world for many use cases and support text and image input. We’re excited to see what you create with them!

Claude 3 Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku are now available as a base for you to build prompt bots with on Poe! These powerful multimodal models are the best in the world for many use cases and support text and image input. We’re excited to see what you create with them!

Poe

17,040 次观看 • 2 年前

I don't think there's a single terminal ux that handles agent swarms well With slate, you can literally use Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 at the exact same time But making it intuitive took a ton of work So heres a thread on how it works and how to actually use it 🧵

I don't think there's a single terminal ux that handles agent swarms well With slate, you can literally use Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 at the exact same time But making it intuitive took a ton of work So heres a thread on how it works and how to actually use it 🧵

akira

139,114 次观看 • 4 个月前

so let me get this straight > OpenAI renamed their whole division "AGI Deployment" > Jensen said AGI is "already in the room" and then ARC-AGI-3 drops and on a scale from 0 to 100% SOTA models score: GPT-5.4: 0.26% Gemini Pro: 0.37% Claude Opus 4.6: 0.25% Grok: literally 0% meanwhile 100% of human testers solved every single environment. first try. no instructions. no training. AGI is "in the room" brother it couldn't find the room

so let me get this straight > OpenAI renamed their whole division "AGI Deployment" > Jensen said AGI is "already in the room" and then ARC-AGI-3 drops and on a scale from 0 to 100% SOTA models score: GPT-5.4: 0.26% Gemini Pro: 0.37% Claude Opus 4.6: 0.25% Grok: literally 0% meanwhile 100% of human testers solved every single environment. first try. no instructions. no training. AGI is "in the room" brother it couldn't find the room

Dan ⚡️

250,780 次观看 • 4 个月前

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.

Dev Ed

279,565 次观看 • 4 个月前

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

Dan Shipper 📧

354,033 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: R.I.P. CLICKFUNNELS. Opus 4.6 ONE-SHOTS entire VSL funnels now. I compressed my entire VSL framework into a single 5,280-word prompt. The same framework that's generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls. HOW IT WORKS: You plug in your offer details. It spits out: → Full VSL script from hook to close → Built on the persuasion structure behind EVERY high-converting agency funnel → Generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls This thing can INSTANTLY double your booked calls. Use it now or get left behind. 🤘 Like + reply "OPUS" and I'll DM it to you

🚨 BREAKING: R.I.P. CLICKFUNNELS. Opus 4.6 ONE-SHOTS entire VSL funnels now. I compressed my entire VSL framework into a single 5,280-word prompt. The same framework that's generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls. HOW IT WORKS: You plug in your offer details. It spits out: → Full VSL script from hook to close → Built on the persuasion structure behind EVERY high-converting agency funnel → Generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls This thing can INSTANTLY double your booked calls. Use it now or get left behind. 🤘 Like + reply "OPUS" and I'll DM it to you

Lucas - EffectiveVSL

37,452 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: R.I.P. CLICKFUNNELS. Opus 4.6 ONE-SHOTS entire VSL funnels now. I compressed my entire VSL framework into a single 5,280-word prompt. The same framework that's generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls. HOW IT WORKS: You plug in your offer details. It spits out: → Full VSL script from hook to close → Built on the persuasion structure behind EVERY high-converting agency funnel → Generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls This thing can INSTANTLY double your booked calls. Use it now or get left behind. 🤘 Like + reply "OPUS" and I'll DM it to you

🚨 BREAKING: R.I.P. CLICKFUNNELS. Opus 4.6 ONE-SHOTS entire VSL funnels now. I compressed my entire VSL framework into a single 5,280-word prompt. The same framework that's generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls. HOW IT WORKS: You plug in your offer details. It spits out: → Full VSL script from hook to close → Built on the persuasion structure behind EVERY high-converting agency funnel → Generated $1M+ and 500+ booked calls This thing can INSTANTLY double your booked calls. Use it now or get left behind. 🤘 Like + reply "OPUS" and I'll DM it to you

Lucas - EffectiveVSL

71,002 次观看 • 5 个月前

Bruhhh I literally just told AI to do research about today's premier league matches , log in to my sporty bet account and place bets based on its analysis And .... It did just that! 🤯😲 (This cost me almost 3$ using opus 4.6 for this task 😭 ) Going to turn this into a full fledged product / project The age of AI is here and it's not stopping 🚀

Bruhhh I literally just told AI to do research about today's premier league matches , log in to my sporty bet account and place bets based on its analysis And .... It did just that! 🤯😲 (This cost me almost 3$ using opus 4.6 for this task 😭 ) Going to turn this into a full fledged product / project The age of AI is here and it's not stopping 🚀

victory

73,962 次观看 • 5 个月前

72 hours ago I shipped QuickClaw. I just hit 5,700 downloads. I though it would be cool if you could spin up an open claw server from your iphone. no vps no api keys no mac minis no config or setup Just download -> setup in 30 seconds. I completely overhauled that chat system, its absolutely smooth as butter now. The streaming responses from opus 4.6 are beautiful. I am in the process of adding kimi k2.5 which will give you 5x the amount of credits as sonnet 4.5

72 hours ago I shipped QuickClaw. I just hit 5,700 downloads. I though it would be cool if you could spin up an open claw server from your iphone. no vps no api keys no mac minis no config or setup Just download -> setup in 30 seconds. I completely overhauled that chat system, its absolutely smooth as butter now. The streaming responses from opus 4.6 are beautiful. I am in the process of adding kimi k2.5 which will give you 5x the amount of credits as sonnet 4.5

Max Blade

33,196 次观看 • 5 个月前

let me explain what Anthropic just did they built an AI model so good at finding security vulnerabilities that they have refused to release it meet Claude Mythos → it’s Anthropic’s newest frontier model and it’s not available to the public. not because it’s not ready. because it’s too dangerous → Mythos found tens of thousands of zero day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and web browser… many of them 1 to 2 decades old. for context… Opus 4.6 found about 500. Mythos found tens of thousands → it found vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel. a 27 year old vulnerability in OpenBSD. a 16 year old vulnerability in FFmpeg → it doesn’t just find bugs. it writes the exploits too. that’s the part that scared them → so instead of releasing it… Anthropic has created Project Glasswing. a cybersecurity initiative where they hand picked 40+ companies to use Mythos for defense only → the partner list reads like a who’s who of tech… Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Nvidia, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, JPMorgan, the Linux Foundation → Anthropic is giving up to $100 million in usage credits to these partners and $4 million to open source security organizations → they’re briefing CISA and the Commerce Department on how to handle this → the benchmarks are truly insane… Mythos hit 77.8% on SWE-bench Pro where Opus 4.6 scored 53.4%. hit 93.9% on SWE-bench Verified where Opus 4.6 scored 80.8% → Anthropic’s head of frontier red team said this is “the first time a model is this good that we decided to approach release in a very different way” this is the first time an AI company has held back a model because it was too capable not too expensive. not too slow. too dangerous and instead of locking it in a vault they weaponized it for defense and gave it to the companies that run the internet that’s either the most responsible thing an AI company has ever done… or the scariest only time will tell

let me explain what Anthropic just did they built an AI model so good at finding security vulnerabilities that they have refused to release it meet Claude Mythos → it’s Anthropic’s newest frontier model and it’s not available to the public. not because it’s not ready. because it’s too dangerous → Mythos found tens of thousands of zero day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and web browser… many of them 1 to 2 decades old. for context… Opus 4.6 found about 500. Mythos found tens of thousands → it found vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel. a 27 year old vulnerability in OpenBSD. a 16 year old vulnerability in FFmpeg → it doesn’t just find bugs. it writes the exploits too. that’s the part that scared them → so instead of releasing it… Anthropic has created Project Glasswing. a cybersecurity initiative where they hand picked 40+ companies to use Mythos for defense only → the partner list reads like a who’s who of tech… Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Nvidia, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, JPMorgan, the Linux Foundation → Anthropic is giving up to $100 million in usage credits to these partners and $4 million to open source security organizations → they’re briefing CISA and the Commerce Department on how to handle this → the benchmarks are truly insane… Mythos hit 77.8% on SWE-bench Pro where Opus 4.6 scored 53.4%. hit 93.9% on SWE-bench Verified where Opus 4.6 scored 80.8% → Anthropic’s head of frontier red team said this is “the first time a model is this good that we decided to approach release in a very different way” this is the first time an AI company has held back a model because it was too capable not too expensive. not too slow. too dangerous and instead of locking it in a vault they weaponized it for defense and gave it to the companies that run the internet that’s either the most responsible thing an AI company has ever done… or the scariest only time will tell

klöss

21,270 次观看 • 3 个月前