正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

We've all had software we loved just...vanish. Acquihire, hostile takeover: sorry users, go home, nobody cares. Hear David A. Johnston explain why that can't happen onchain. Thx to open source & distributed compute, things run onchain whether ppl want it to or not lol Morpheus

241,200 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Brian Finley Nitrograph 的头像
Brian Finley Nitrograph8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs Thx happen run why

Trending coins on Google 的头像
Trending coins on Google8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs that's a solid point about onchain resilience

Zack 的头像
Zack8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs Exactly. you cant rug code thats everywhere

P A U L 的头像
P A U L8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs cant kill code thats everywhere broski

nice 的头像
nice8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs exactly, code outlives the corp every time

xdiep4474.eth 的头像
xdiep4474.eth8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs exactly bro, open source and onchain means the code survives even if teams ghost lol

StarShipX 的头像
StarShipX5 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs 理解できます!オープンソースと分散コンピューティングのおかげで、オンチェーン上で消えることはありませんね。確かに面白いですね。

Pii™Ducks 的头像
Pii™Ducks8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs yup fr code gonna outlive teams xD

khalid 的头像
khalid8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs helpful content

Luceyeon 的头像
Luceyeon8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs Software disappear, onchain ensures it stays forever. Freedom reigns.

Morgan | Alpha Hunter 的头像
Morgan | Alpha Hunter8 个月前

@DJohnstonEC @MorpheusAIs onchain dont dir bro ';o

相关视频

Author of Designing Data-Intensive Applications, Martin Kleppmann, gives us a peek into "The Troubles with Distributed Systems" and why you can't assume things behave well in distributed systems: "The whole idea is that in distributed system theory, there are certain things that we tend to assume. For example, we just assume that there's no upper bound on how long it might take for a message to go over the network. So when you send a message, it might arrive within a hundred microseconds, or it might take 10 years, and distributed system theory just doesn't make any assumptions about that sort of timing if we can avoid it. Or rather, some theory does make those assumptions, but it's a dangerous assumption to make because occasionally the network delay does become much higher than what is typical. Another thing is about crashes. Distributed system theory just says nodes can crash, but what does that actually mean? What in practice does it mean for a node to become unavailable? Because it might be a software crash, but it might be a hardware failure. It might be somebody unplugging the power cable. It might be that the node is actually still running, but it's just become disconnected from the network. And so, the point of this book chapter really is to defend and justify the theoretical models that we use for analysing distributed systems and to give a lot of stories and case studies to show that, actually, tonnes of stuff does go wrong. Don't believe anyone who says, 'Oh, failures are rare. Don't worry about it. It's fine’. Actually, no. If you want to make things reliable, you really do have to worry about a whole bunch of weird, unusual, but certainly possible edge cases. Timing is another one of those things. It's very easy to assume that your clocks are correct, and most of the time the clocks are pretty correct, but we just can't rely on it because actually they're just not precise enough on the whole. It's very tempting to make certain assumptions that things are well behaved and in distributed systems, we just have to try to get away from those assumptions if we want the systems to work reliably, even in the face of things going wrong."

The Pragmatic Engineer

50,567 次观看 • 5 个月前

CFTC Mike Selig laid out an exciting roadmap for the Commission's top priorities at Milken Institute's Future of Finance 2026 today: "I view Project Crypto as a historic initiative between the agencies to upgrade and modernize our rules and regulations and future-proof them for technologies like crypto...." "Many of the firms want to move onchain. The prior administration drove a lot of these firms and the liquidity offshore. The perpetuals markets are a great example of this. We've had perpetual futures contracts in crypto assets for a very long time[,] but they've developed offshore[.] We've got to bring that back to the United States. We need to have that liquidity here in the U.S...." "We're working towards getting perpetual futures, true perpetual futures, not long-dated contracts, here in the U.S. within the next month or so.... We're also working towards onchain markets, so we're looking to have clear guidance as to what sort of digital wallets would implicate our regulations. The prior administration really went after firms that were just offering software products...." "We're also working towards regulations that accommodate onchain software systems, so decentralized finance protocols and other types of blockchain networks.... We're going to make sure it's very clear as to what implicates the CFTC's regulations and what doesn't, and to the extent that an onchain software system or front-end does implicate our rules or regulations, we're modernizing and future-proofing those rules so that there's a place for all of that." HPC applauds Chairman Selig's forward-thinking approach to regulation and stands ready to support his crucial work ensuring that decentralized markets for perpetual derivatives thrive in the United States. 🇺🇸

Hyperliquid Policy Center

72,617 次观看 • 7 个月前

#beonnnie TikTok live [251214] 💬: You must want to talk abt the movie theatre (the Zootopia 2 showing with EmiBonnie). 🐰: Ahh, I want to tell everyone that every time we have an opportunity to go to an event where we get to see our fans, we really do our best to interact with everyone, but, and this isn't just for the movie theatre, but for all events, I feel like we're a pair that gives our all. We really want to see all the fans. I understand that there might be things we need to improve upon, like we might take too much time in one area making us not have enough time to give other fans the same amount of attention. 🐰: I want you all to know that even if we don't get to interact with everyone, bc there really are so many ppl and sometimes they're in areas we can't reach, or due to time or location limitations or other things, we might not be able to talk to everyone, but we do want to talk to everyone. I understand everyone, but yeah. I don't want you guys to feel hurt or neglected, bc both P'Mi and I really try our best. 🐰: No drama, okay? No drama. No drama, everyone. I just don't want you guys to feel like we don't see you. I don't want anyone to feel like we don't care or are neglecting them, bc P'Mi and I are really trying our best. We truly want to interact with everyone, but the circumstances might not really allow us to do so. We both really spend a lot of time every time we get to see our fans, bc we don't get to see everyone often, so we really want to interact with everyone, guys. 🐰: I understand everyone, but I don't want you guys to be sad, okay? I don't want you guys to feel sad. I want you all to know that we want to talk to everyone, but bc of all the circumstances, it's hard to be able to do that. 🐰: I hope we can understand each other. Sometimes, we also don't know whether or not we've already interacted with someone. Sometimes, if someone call out to us, we'll turn towards them. It's not that we don't want to interact with ppl who don't talk, we do want to interact with everyone, but with the situation at those times, we can't control everything. We can't manage everything the way we expect, so can we be together in a chill way, without expectations? We really are trying our hardest. 🐰: I don't want you guys to have too many expectations. When you have too many expectations, you'll get stressed and make yourself annoyed, and when you feel bad abt things, then I feel uneasy too, like, did I not do my job well enough? I don't want you guys to have too many expectations to the point that you pressure yourselves that much, bc we both really want to interact with everyone equally. Truly. 🐰: No sadness, no sadness! We're talking to each other with reason. No sadness, no sadness. 🐰: That's all. No no No no~ I'm not sad, I'm full today. Not annoyed. No no No no No~ 🐰: I just want to say that we love all of you. Don't feel hurt or neglected, okay? Thank you to Bonnie's Home for uploading the live to YT 🙏🏼

K-bab

25,244 次观看 • 9 个月前