Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

We've all heard the endless back-and-forth: "Vaccines save lives!" vs. "They're dangerous!" Both sides scream their arguments, point to studies, and dig in. But here's the fiery truth Del Bigtree just laid down in this clip—we have ZERO data. They haven't done the studies. 🔥 NO prospective placebo-controlled safety...

32,824 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"Never a Placebo-Controlled Group": How Our Children's Vaccines Were Licensed on a Foundation of Flimsy Science. We are told the vaccine schedule is the most tested and safest in medical history. But what if that claim collapses under the weight of the actual data? Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a stunning fact that should halt every parent and citizen in their tracks: "Almost all childhood vaccines were licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed for days or weeks after injection, underpowered, not enough kids, and there was never a placebo-controlled group for a single of the routine childhood vaccines injected into children, not one of them." Let that sink in. Not one. The gold standard of scientific research—the placebo-controlled trial—was abandoned for the entire routine childhood vaccine schedule. Why the Double Standard? For prescription drugs, companies run years-long, placebo-controlled trials. Why? Not ethics—economics. They are liable for damages. A harmful drug means financial ruin. For vaccines, the incentive is perversely flipped. With liability removed, the corporate boardroom's bottom-line calculus is simple: do the absolute minimum required for licensure. The Hep B Example is Jaw-Dropping Proof. The Combovax HB vaccine, given to babies on their first day of life, was licensed based on a "trial" that: - Monitored safety for just FIVE DAYS. - Included only 147 children. - Had NO control group whatsoever. This isn't just inadequate; it's scientifically indefensible. The recent COVID vaccine trials, often criticized as rushed, were vastly more comprehensive than this. The Root Cause? The Liability Shield. There is no doubt: if vaccine manufacturers were financially liable for injuries, the safety science would be exhaustive. They would never risk their profits on such flimsy data. The absence of liability created an absence of scientific rigor. This isn't conspiracy. It's cold, hard corporate calculus, and our children are the ones living in the experiment. It's long past time to demand the same gold-standard safety proof for vaccines that we demand for every pill we swallow.

Camus

38,809 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Del Bigtree Exposes the Lack of Placebo Trials in FDA-Licensed Vaccines In a powerful and unflinching monologue, Del Bigtree issues a direct challenge to the medical establishment and calls for a new era of public scrutiny. He urges everyone to bypass the experts and see the evidence for themselves. Del Bigtree: "I'm telling you right now, just type in 'FDA licensed vaccines' on their website. Go to section 6.1 on every single vaccine insert. Look what it says about the placebo trials. They never did one. Not on any of the childhood vaccines." He argues that this critical information was hidden from the public, negating any possibility of true informed consent. This foundational claim is the bedrock of his larger accusation: that we have been systematically lied to by the very agencies tasked with protecting our health. Del Bigtree: "Tony Fauci lied about six-foot distancing. Everyone at the CDC lied, as Robert Kennedy Jr. clearly showed, about the COVID vaccine stopping transmission. Remember 'it stops with you'? Bull crap. We know it doesn't. The FDA has already admitted it." His solution? A radical shift away from blind trust. "Do not trust experts any longer. We've been lied to long enough... You have got to start asking people to show their work. You've got to see the evidence." But this isn't just about criticism; it's about revelation. Bigtree teases a groundbreaking new study—the "vaxxed vs. unvaxxed" research he has long championed. He claims to have partnered with a skeptic who wanted to prove him wrong, promising to accept whatever the results showed on one condition: that it be published. Del Bigtree: "Wait till you see how bad it is when you do this study the right way, even when you try to prove us wrong. The movie about this study is 'An Inconvenient Study.' And boy, is it inconvenient." He positions this coming evidence as a turning point, a moment of reckoning for the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies, and every official who has ever been part of what he calls "covering up the real science." Del Bigtree: "We're not going to take it anymore. And now we've got evidence like they have never, ever had before—made possible by you." The call to action is clear. Look up the inserts. Question the narrative. Demand the evidence. The era of blind trust is over.

Camus

117,921 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten