Whale evolution is the best argument against macroevolution. Don’t attempt to refute it. Just point and laugh. 😆

I like how they go from a fish to some rat/dog thing and we’re just supposed to accept that it happened.

Because the spine moves the same way, duh! Notice how they don’t explain how an animal went from mouth breathing to breathing through a retractable hole in its back?

@JesusMetal1689 I was wondering that as well. Turns out it’s not the back, the whales heads are just very long, and it’s the nose

@JesusMetal1689 Its “nose” is an independent airway, the only way it can breathe. It remains closed at rest. That’s completely different from the mammals you suggest are its ancestors.

Have you ever seen a Whale Skeleton? They still have fingers.

Yes, homology in vertebrate limbs is a well known “icon” of evolution.

The existence of transpecies homology at all suggests common ancestors.

Did you watch the video I sent you? You’re making a circular argument.

I am currently in roaming in the Philippines. Video costs me extra. 😆 But, give me your argument and I can show you either a circle or an unnecessary presupposition.

Simply put, you’re defining homology in terms of common ancestry and then using it as proof of common ancestry. That is circular reasoning. Homology is evidence of common design and a Designer, nothing more.

I do not think so. In homology, hypotheses are derived using structural correspondence, developmental pathways, and shared genetic sequences (e.g., Hox genes), not by first assuming common ancestry. Research Biologists can test whether the pattern fits a nested hierarchy consistent with descent. I remember a Baptist version of me in 2006 being made to watch a video by some elderly preacher about evolution. I think Gish was his name. These lectures featured him naming so many objections sequentially so quickly that one could not answer them all. It took him a minute to make a claim and it took me hours in the library to realize he was wrong. A small part of the story of me losing my faith as a teenager. I was not a Neuroscience Researcher for that long, but I do know that getting sucked into a circular proof pattern can happen. We used to spend hour or more lab meetings testing chairs of logic to ensure that tests were actually proving or disproving the hypothesis.

The evolutionists see the problem actually, and it’s demonstrated in the video I sent. Take a look when you get to a better signal!

"400 million years ago..." I'm out after 3 seconds.

😆😆😆😆😆 At least I kept it under a minute.

It's one of my biggest pet peeves. When someone claims they know what happened millions of years ago, I know they aren't to be trusted.

We wuz returnin to da sea n sheeiiiit

Cuz we be feelin like it, cuzzzzz

These hips be for fukkk boiiiii

Dude. Believing evolution is retarded.

Simple as.

Whale evolution is the BEST evidence for evolution. Since it's such bad evidence, we can be certain that evolution is false

“Whales swim in exactly the same way as an overgrown dog runs, it’s science.”

This is from a National Geographic special, btw. 🤭

"this is our theory, accept it as fact" no, I'm not going to do that. "oh, but it's a scientific theory, it's diff-" it's a largely unsupported story you tell yourselves, you cattle.

That’s an amazing leap at the end.

“We have no idea why this happened, but just believe us anyway.”

It blows my mind that smart people believe the farce of macroevolution, and people like Joe Rogan are essentially functioning as propagandists for its continued belief.

love how the coelocanth (SEE-lo-kanth) was supposed to be this primordial bonefish but they accidentally discovered some shanty fisherman in Zanzibar making seaside ceviche with one

So following this theory if I keep trying to live underwater, and force all my descendants to try the same, eventually we (my lineage) will develop gills? or am I just retarded?

Maybe the fat Mexican eating a bag of weed in the middle of “earth science” class instead of paying attention somehow made the smarter choice.

"Macro" evolution, as defined by scientists, is evolving into a different species. This is not only accepted by every major creationists group, but they use it as a cope for the fact that you can't fit 2 of every species on a 300 cubit boat

Macro evolution takes a greater leap of blind faith than creationism.

They make you pay to learn it too hahaha.

Whale evolution is my favorite way to refute.

Whale evolution always made perfect intuitive sense to me from a young age. For the life of me I can never figure out what creationists are talking about when they say they find it unbelievable.

"then they all lost their spines in the early 21st Century except for a subspecies of right wing mammals who were mass reported by Antifa, banned from Twitter, fired from their corporate jobs for refusing to be vaccinated, and achieved their final form as Christian Nationalists."

"God is actually three persons. But he's also just one being. And the 2nd God person became a human and died and rose from the dead." If you are just going to dismiss claims based on how silly they initially seem, Christianity has to go too.

Except that the Trinity and the hypostatic union are biblical, while Darwinian evolution is not.

So was your post only intended for people who already accept the teachings of the Bible?

Gaius definitely does homology on weekends

He’s a good dude.

Sincere question, how do you believe whales came about? Did God create whales on the fifth day- and those are the same whales of today?

The whale kinds were created along with the fish kinds and bird kinds, all on the same day. And no, they changed considerably over time…but whales remained whales, fish remained fish, etc.

Not really, if some individuals can thrive in the water, it naturally becomes a place where those groups would specialize to fill the gap in the ecosystem

"Macro" evolution, as creationists use the word, can't exists, because "kinds," as creationists use the word, don't exists Fish evolved into all land vertebrates, including humans & whales, without ever changing to a different "kind"

Evolution is so dumb and gay.

Hippos have been standing in the water for 60 million years, waiting to turn into a whale. Any day now…

"Anything but God" is the longest-running clown show

Recently saw a video where they were suggesting that over the course of a billion years multiple erosion events took place to explain geology. Each time I was thinking... so like a global flood maybe? Try somewhere in the range of 4-6k years ago instead

But they speak with such certainty it's almost faith like 🤔.

Why point and laugh? If your habitat changes from plains to swamp to wetland to sunken coasts and finally to open ocean over millions of years it becomes a natural progression.

This is just showing the movement of the spine, this is not showing all of the transitions we have fossil evidence of

Evolution of the gaps