Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

What a great question! William asks whether the DNA work by NatureMetrics could help solve the mystery of the Loch Ness Monster. And they’ve tried, he is told. Sadly there seems to be no Nessie. All researchers can find DNA evidence of are ‘very big eels’ 🧬

Rebecca English

238,587 subscribers

37,690 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля The Wales Family (fan account)

The Wales Family (fan account)1 год назад

@NatureMetrics William is clearly so interested in every Earthshot Prize project! He knows what he is talking about ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Фото профиля FRANK E ELKINS

FRANK E ELKINS2 лет назад

“Science doesn’t tell us why the Big Bang happened, how the singularity occurred in the first place, or why it exploded when it did. It tells us there is objective scientific evidence that it occurred. So, what exactly was the Big Bang?” – Book III The Enigmatic Mystery

Фото профиля Kim

Kim1 год назад

@NatureMetrics No. I refuse to accept this 😂😂

Фото профиля Saxon Born

Saxon Born1 год назад

@NatureMetrics Nope there’s a time portal under the loch. I saw it on Outlander.

Фото профиля Small Paul

Small Paul1 год назад

@NatureMetrics This really is dire, Becks

Фото профиля Disa

Disa1 год назад

@NatureMetrics Nooo 🫢 Don’t say oor Nessie isn’t real 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Фото профиля Kate

Kate1 год назад

@NatureMetrics Dear me

Фото профиля CapturedbyKitties

CapturedbyKitties1 год назад

@NatureMetrics Nessie is a magical dinosaur not an eel. She lives in our hearts and minds.

Фото профиля Mona👑

Mona👑1 год назад

@NatureMetrics 🤩🤩🤩

Фото профиля Susan 🌸💜

Susan 🌸💜1 год назад

@NatureMetrics You’ve gone from scrapping the bottom of the barrel for sycophantic stories to actually now going underneath the barrel 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Фото профиля BJ Monte

BJ Monte1 год назад

@NatureMetrics Oh No! Not Nessie!!😞 This is like finding out there is no Santa!

Похожие видео

The mystery of the Loch Ness Monster has baffled people for decades - is this the latest example that there may be more to the myth? Kevin O'Sullivan

The mystery of the Loch Ness Monster has baffled people for decades - is this the latest example that there may be more to the myth? Kevin O'Sullivan

Talk

15,394 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Prince William and I extracted the DNA from a strawberry. I went to NatureMetrics today to find out how they’re extracting environmental DNA from soil, rivers and the air to learn more about the world and help protect nature 🪴 #science #experiment #chemistry

Prince William and I extracted the DNA from a strawberry. I went to NatureMetrics today to find out how they’re extracting environmental DNA from soil, rivers and the air to learn more about the world and help protect nature 🪴 #science #experiment #chemistry

Big Manny

4,736,902 просмотров • 1 год назад

Nessie Spotted? The Mysterious Loch Ness Monster Caught on Camera! 🐉👀

Nessie Spotted? The Mysterious Loch Ness Monster Caught on Camera! 🐉👀

Mysteries_X_

54,338 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Immunologist Jessica Rose EXPOSES Covid vaccines for containing DNA fragments—something “The Experts” told us was crazy to even consider. “We tested a lot of vials. ALL of them had DNA.” “We've been told for years … foreign DNA fragments aren't a big deal.” “A lot of DNA in all the vials, and over the alleged EMA limits—which are already too high because they rely on naked DNA assessments.” “One of the DNA fragments we found … can induce all sorts of problems that basically all lead to cancer … can cause genomic instability.” “If you're talking about inserting a cell with billions of fragments of foreign DNA, you're talking about the potential for epigenetic modifications happening.” “There are some questions that everybody kind of needs to answer.”

Immunologist Jessica Rose EXPOSES Covid vaccines for containing DNA fragments—something “The Experts” told us was crazy to even consider. “We tested a lot of vials. ALL of them had DNA.” “We've been told for years … foreign DNA fragments aren't a big deal.” “A lot of DNA in all the vials, and over the alleged EMA limits—which are already too high because they rely on naked DNA assessments.” “One of the DNA fragments we found … can induce all sorts of problems that basically all lead to cancer … can cause genomic instability.” “If you're talking about inserting a cell with billions of fragments of foreign DNA, you're talking about the potential for epigenetic modifications happening.” “There are some questions that everybody kind of needs to answer.”

Children’s Health Defense

57,983 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

As I said today on Politics Live, there is more evidence for the existence of the Loch Ness Monster than for Labour’s £22 billion black hole.

As I said today on Politics Live, there is more evidence for the existence of the Loch Ness Monster than for Labour’s £22 billion black hole.

Andrew Griffith MP

217,240 просмотров • 1 год назад

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“There’s a good possibility he left DNA behind…” Suzanna Ryan explains how DNA and genetic genealogy can build a profile of a suspect and help solve the Nancy Guthrie case. Watch below, and subscribe:

The Megyn Kelly Show

11,751 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

😮 Ally: "Do you believe in the Loch Ness monster?" 🤔 Gabby: "Where would I find it?" 🤣 Ally: "In Loch Ness...that's why it's called the Loch Ness monster! That's a bit of a clue!" Gabby Agbonlahor gets a lesson in Scottish folklore and geography from Ally McCoist! 🤭👀

😮 Ally: "Do you believe in the Loch Ness monster?" 🤔 Gabby: "Where would I find it?" 🤣 Ally: "In Loch Ness...that's why it's called the Loch Ness monster! That's a bit of a clue!" Gabby Agbonlahor gets a lesson in Scottish folklore and geography from Ally McCoist! 🤭👀

talkSPORT

350,629 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨🧬 DNA evidence seized from the scene [presumably rifle and screwdriver—?] consisted of a mixture of FIVE individuals according to Tyler Robinson’s defense.🧬🚨

🚨🧬 DNA evidence seized from the scene [presumably rifle and screwdriver—?] consisted of a mixture of FIVE individuals according to Tyler Robinson’s defense.🧬🚨

JaneDoeUKnow

77,400 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Introducing AlphaGenome: an AI model to help scientists better understand our DNA – the instruction manual for life 🧬 Researchers can now quickly predict what impact genetic changes could have - helping to generate new hypotheses and drive biological discoveries. ↓

Introducing AlphaGenome: an AI model to help scientists better understand our DNA – the instruction manual for life 🧬 Researchers can now quickly predict what impact genetic changes could have - helping to generate new hypotheses and drive biological discoveries. ↓

Google DeepMind

795,418 просмотров • 1 год назад

"What Your DNA Actually Does Is Mind Blowing" What do you know about your DNA? Why aren't we taught the importance of our DNA? What does DNA do? Memory? Why can't we remember past lives? What is everlasting life? What is consciousness? The body dies but what happens to the consciousness? If you could remember every life you've ever had from before and all to come is that Living Forever? ✨🧬

"What Your DNA Actually Does Is Mind Blowing" What do you know about your DNA? Why aren't we taught the importance of our DNA? What does DNA do? Memory? Why can't we remember past lives? What is everlasting life? What is consciousness? The body dies but what happens to the consciousness? If you could remember every life you've ever had from before and all to come is that Living Forever? ✨🧬

Drewski

219,388 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan Shares Summary of DNA Contamination Found in the COVID mRNA Vaccines & Preliminary Evidence of DNA Integration "The fact checkers who told you this DNA won't get into the cell are proven wrong by this data. We can see DNA in there. It's a very high copy number...We've also found two genome integrations. This has not been replicated like all of our qPCR data, so this is very early, but we have fusions of DNA between the spike sequence and Chromosome 12 and between the spike sequence and Chromosome 9. This needs to be confirmed with long read sequencers where we can span the entire integration event...But we shouldn't be seeing any of this...So a little bit more validation to do in this but still a little bit concerning." *From the 2/23/2024 International Crisis Summit-5 in Washington DC. Quote is taken from the 9:50 mark. ➡️chiefnerd

Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan Shares Summary of DNA Contamination Found in the COVID mRNA Vaccines & Preliminary Evidence of DNA Integration "The fact checkers who told you this DNA won't get into the cell are proven wrong by this data. We can see DNA in there. It's a very high copy number...We've also found two genome integrations. This has not been replicated like all of our qPCR data, so this is very early, but we have fusions of DNA between the spike sequence and Chromosome 12 and between the spike sequence and Chromosome 9. This needs to be confirmed with long read sequencers where we can span the entire integration event...But we shouldn't be seeing any of this...So a little bit more validation to do in this but still a little bit concerning." *From the 2/23/2024 International Crisis Summit-5 in Washington DC. Quote is taken from the 9:50 mark. ➡️chiefnerd

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

20,109 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Have you ever seen how DNA is organized? It's astounding. A single strand of your DNA, when stretched out, is ~2 meters, or ~6.5 feet long. If you stretched out all the DNA in your body end to end, it could cross the entire solar system, from the sun to Pluto, 17 times. You could wrap all your DNA around the Earth like a rubber band ball almost 2 million times. The storage capacity of DNA is so high that all the world’s digital data (estimated around 175 zettabytes by 2025) could theoretically be stored in just 178lbs of DNA. Imagine, one single server that could handle the entire world's annual data needs. And yet, all of this fits inside the nucleus of a cell, invisible to the naked eye. How is that even possible? To prevent DNA from becoming an tangled mess, unusable for anything, it is organized and packed very specifically. If not for this organization, DNA would be completely unusable for any of Life's processes. It would clump together, unable to be pulled apart to be read by the many interacting molecular systems. To start, smaller segments of DNA are coiled tightly around a special protein called a Histone, whose sole job is to keep DNA organized. This coiled product is called a Nucleosome, which are then further coiled and packed together into long fibers call Chromatin. Chromatin then is further coiled into larger structures called Chromosomes. This organization is not only incredibly efficient, but it also provides functionality to the DNA itself. Chromosome and Chromatin architecture actually effects how DNA functions and communicates with the different systems in the cell, and the number of chromosomes is important to overall function of the DNA in an organism. Without this specific organization, Life could not exist. What does this mean? This means DNA could not have evolved and functioned without simultaneous organization. And DNA can't be organized without the proteins and systems that hold it all together. On top of that, the fact that how DNA is organized affects its function is a clear sign of foresight and planning - all clear signs of intelligent design. The more we learn about molecular biology, the more obvious it is that this was all Created intelligently.

Have you ever seen how DNA is organized? It's astounding. A single strand of your DNA, when stretched out, is ~2 meters, or ~6.5 feet long. If you stretched out all the DNA in your body end to end, it could cross the entire solar system, from the sun to Pluto, 17 times. You could wrap all your DNA around the Earth like a rubber band ball almost 2 million times. The storage capacity of DNA is so high that all the world’s digital data (estimated around 175 zettabytes by 2025) could theoretically be stored in just 178lbs of DNA. Imagine, one single server that could handle the entire world's annual data needs. And yet, all of this fits inside the nucleus of a cell, invisible to the naked eye. How is that even possible? To prevent DNA from becoming an tangled mess, unusable for anything, it is organized and packed very specifically. If not for this organization, DNA would be completely unusable for any of Life's processes. It would clump together, unable to be pulled apart to be read by the many interacting molecular systems. To start, smaller segments of DNA are coiled tightly around a special protein called a Histone, whose sole job is to keep DNA organized. This coiled product is called a Nucleosome, which are then further coiled and packed together into long fibers call Chromatin. Chromatin then is further coiled into larger structures called Chromosomes. This organization is not only incredibly efficient, but it also provides functionality to the DNA itself. Chromosome and Chromatin architecture actually effects how DNA functions and communicates with the different systems in the cell, and the number of chromosomes is important to overall function of the DNA in an organism. Without this specific organization, Life could not exist. What does this mean? This means DNA could not have evolved and functioned without simultaneous organization. And DNA can't be organized without the proteins and systems that hold it all together. On top of that, the fact that how DNA is organized affects its function is a clear sign of foresight and planning - all clear signs of intelligent design. The more we learn about molecular biology, the more obvious it is that this was all Created intelligently.

Divinely Designed

78,586 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

There is no blood, no skin, no tissue, no DNA found on a single piece or shard of taillight that the Commonwealth claims cut and sliced into John O’Keefe’s arm. Where is that trace evidence? Where is that biological evidence? The DNA? Where is it? They’ve got nothing! Not a single piece that the Commonwealth wants you to believe cut up John’s arm—how is that possible? #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead

There is no blood, no skin, no tissue, no DNA found on a single piece or shard of taillight that the Commonwealth claims cut and sliced into John O’Keefe’s arm. Where is that trace evidence? Where is that biological evidence? The DNA? Where is it? They’ve got nothing! Not a single piece that the Commonwealth wants you to believe cut up John’s arm—how is that possible? #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

24,279 просмотров • 1 год назад

EXCLUSIVE: Scene of Nancy Guthrie private lab testing. I’m outside DNA Labs International where the DNA Testing of evidence is happening right now. I traveled to Deerfield Beach, Florida where lab technicians have been testing critical evidence in the investigation — including the glove found nearly 2 miles from her home. We’ve heard a lot about the discrepancies of sending this type of DNA evidence to a private lab versus a lab used by the FBI, but the Pima County Sheriff, Chris Nanos, says this is their protocol, and a lab that they have used for years. There are only a limited number of private accredited DNA labs in the country capable of this level of forensic work. If possible, DNA Labs International will develop a DNA profile from the glove. According to independent DNA consultant Suzanna Ryan of Ryan Forensic, which is not connected to this case but can speak about how this all works, once a profile is developed it will most likely be sent to the Arizona Department of Public Safety. That’s where the quality control process begins: •A qualified DNA analyst or CODIS administrator verifies the data •The profile must meet strict standards before upload •Once approved, it is electronically transmitted through state systems to the Federal Bureau of Investigation •All systems work together within the national DNA database network CODIS This extra verification step can take time — but it’s critical to ensure the data is admissible and accurate. In this exclusive video, I take you to the scene of where this testing is being done. Because the lab sits on private property, we were asked to leave by property management — but this is where the forensic work is happening. More to come on my YouTube Channel The Ingle Edit and on NewsNation

Laura Ingle

202,050 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Kearney Disinformation Correction Yesterday, Aidan Kearney attempted to attack the lack of canine DNA detected on John's clothing by tweeting two misleading claims. 1. Canine Swab Collection Kearney Disinformation: Michael Proctor was the source of DNA collected. Factual Information: The swabs were neither from Proctor's body nor collected by him. The swabs were collected by Maureen Hartnett at the MSP crime lab from John's shirt per instructions of Teri Kuhn at UC Davis and were received packaged appropriately. 2. Inhibitors Caused The Lack of Canine DNA Kearney Disinformation: There were inhibitors on John's clothing that masked the presence of canine DNA. Factual Information: UC Davis was asked to perform two tests: a nuclear DNA test which would be used to identify a specific animal and, if the nuclear DNA test failed to yield results, a mitochondrial DNA test called Meat ID to determine presence of DNA from a variety of species. Nuclear DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell and only 2 copies exist whereas mitochondrial DNA is found in the cytoplasm and is significantly more abundant with hundreds of thousands of copies. Nuclear DNA tests are far more accurate in determining the exact source, ie one dog from another dog, whereas mitochondrial DNA is less specific but will be able to determine if DNA from a specific animal species is present. In this case, the presence of DNA from 12 different animal species, including canine and pig, was tested. The results of the QPCR testing for nuclear DNA were that the swabs "did not indicate the presence of canine (nuclear) DNA, but did indicate the presence of inhibitors. This result is obtained when 1. Canine DNA is degraded, 2. The DNA is obscured by inhibitors, or 3. There is no nuclear DNA present." The less specific test using mitochondrial DNA, Meat ID, was then completed. This test showed no canine DNA and further, showed no inhibitors. In other words, had canine DNA been present, it would have been identified on the Meat ID mitochondrial testing since there were no inhibitors. The below video contains questioning from both the defense and prosecution supporting the identified factual information.

Kearney Disinformation Correction Yesterday, Aidan Kearney attempted to attack the lack of canine DNA detected on John's clothing by tweeting two misleading claims. 1. Canine Swab Collection Kearney Disinformation: Michael Proctor was the source of DNA collected. Factual Information: The swabs were neither from Proctor's body nor collected by him. The swabs were collected by Maureen Hartnett at the MSP crime lab from John's shirt per instructions of Teri Kuhn at UC Davis and were received packaged appropriately. 2. Inhibitors Caused The Lack of Canine DNA Kearney Disinformation: There were inhibitors on John's clothing that masked the presence of canine DNA. Factual Information: UC Davis was asked to perform two tests: a nuclear DNA test which would be used to identify a specific animal and, if the nuclear DNA test failed to yield results, a mitochondrial DNA test called Meat ID to determine presence of DNA from a variety of species. Nuclear DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell and only 2 copies exist whereas mitochondrial DNA is found in the cytoplasm and is significantly more abundant with hundreds of thousands of copies. Nuclear DNA tests are far more accurate in determining the exact source, ie one dog from another dog, whereas mitochondrial DNA is less specific but will be able to determine if DNA from a specific animal species is present. In this case, the presence of DNA from 12 different animal species, including canine and pig, was tested. The results of the QPCR testing for nuclear DNA were that the swabs "did not indicate the presence of canine (nuclear) DNA, but did indicate the presence of inhibitors. This result is obtained when 1. Canine DNA is degraded, 2. The DNA is obscured by inhibitors, or 3. There is no nuclear DNA present." The less specific test using mitochondrial DNA, Meat ID, was then completed. This test showed no canine DNA and further, showed no inhibitors. In other words, had canine DNA been present, it would have been identified on the Meat ID mitochondrial testing since there were no inhibitors. The below video contains questioning from both the defense and prosecution supporting the identified factual information.

Julie Carpenter

10,660 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

The All-In Podcast

79,718 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Our DNA is also spiral, and as humans progress through the years, more and more of the "dark DNA" is unlocked as we move closer to God. The soul can accelerate this evolution with the help of ancient esoteric religious techniques, unlocking the full potential of the DNA. Otherwise, the soul must go through the entire process of the Great Year. (7/11)🧵

Our DNA is also spiral, and as humans progress through the years, more and more of the "dark DNA" is unlocked as we move closer to God. The soul can accelerate this evolution with the help of ancient esoteric religious techniques, unlocking the full potential of the DNA. Otherwise, the soul must go through the entire process of the Great Year. (7/11)🧵

Open Minded Approach

64,884 просмотров • 1 год назад