Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

What a great question! William asks whether the DNA work by NatureMetrics could help solve the mystery of the Loch Ness Monster. And they’ve tried, he is told. Sadly there seems to be no Nessie. All researchers can find DNA evidence of are ‘very big eels’ 🧬

Rebecca English

238,587 subscribers

37,690 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Wales Family (fan account)

The Wales Family (fan account)vor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics William is clearly so interested in every Earthshot Prize project! He knows what he is talking about ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Profilbild von FRANK E ELKINS

FRANK E ELKINSvor 2 Jahren

“Science doesn’t tell us why the Big Bang happened, how the singularity occurred in the first place, or why it exploded when it did. It tells us there is objective scientific evidence that it occurred. So, what exactly was the Big Bang?” – Book III The Enigmatic Mystery

Profilbild von Kim

Kimvor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics No. I refuse to accept this 😂😂

Profilbild von Saxon Born

Saxon Bornvor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics Nope there’s a time portal under the loch. I saw it on Outlander.

Profilbild von Small Paul

Small Paulvor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics This really is dire, Becks

Profilbild von Disa

Disavor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics Nooo 🫢 Don’t say oor Nessie isn’t real 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Profilbild von Kate

Katevor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics Dear me

Profilbild von CapturedbyKitties

CapturedbyKittiesvor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics Nessie is a magical dinosaur not an eel. She lives in our hearts and minds.

Profilbild von Mona👑

Mona👑vor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics 🤩🤩🤩

Profilbild von Susan 🌸💜

Susan 🌸💜vor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics You’ve gone from scrapping the bottom of the barrel for sycophantic stories to actually now going underneath the barrel 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Profilbild von BJ Monte

BJ Montevor 1 Jahr

@NatureMetrics Oh No! Not Nessie!!😞 This is like finding out there is no Santa!

Ähnliche Videos

Immunologist Jessica Rose EXPOSES Covid vaccines for containing DNA fragments—something “The Experts” told us was crazy to even consider. “We tested a lot of vials. ALL of them had DNA.” “We've been told for years … foreign DNA fragments aren't a big deal.” “A lot of DNA in all the vials, and over the alleged EMA limits—which are already too high because they rely on naked DNA assessments.” “One of the DNA fragments we found … can induce all sorts of problems that basically all lead to cancer … can cause genomic instability.” “If you're talking about inserting a cell with billions of fragments of foreign DNA, you're talking about the potential for epigenetic modifications happening.” “There are some questions that everybody kind of needs to answer.”

Immunologist Jessica Rose EXPOSES Covid vaccines for containing DNA fragments—something “The Experts” told us was crazy to even consider. “We tested a lot of vials. ALL of them had DNA.” “We've been told for years … foreign DNA fragments aren't a big deal.” “A lot of DNA in all the vials, and over the alleged EMA limits—which are already too high because they rely on naked DNA assessments.” “One of the DNA fragments we found … can induce all sorts of problems that basically all lead to cancer … can cause genomic instability.” “If you're talking about inserting a cell with billions of fragments of foreign DNA, you're talking about the potential for epigenetic modifications happening.” “There are some questions that everybody kind of needs to answer.”

Children’s Health Defense

57,983 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Could Your DNA Be Used to Build a Bioweapon Against You? “Is it possible to create a biological weapon that would only target American DNA, Canadian DNA, North American DNA, Latino DNA, black DNA? I asked that exact question to Admiral Brett Giroir, and he said to me, after a bit of a pause, yes. And there are suspicions that China is doing that. Biological weapons are illegal. Nuclear weapons are not illegal. The Soviets signed the treaty, and then they began to build a colossal biological weapons program. The idea, which is so spooky, is that they wanted to kill all the people in America and the West and leave the infrastructure intact. Those were their words.” Annie Jacobsen

Could Your DNA Be Used to Build a Bioweapon Against You? “Is it possible to create a biological weapon that would only target American DNA, Canadian DNA, North American DNA, Latino DNA, black DNA? I asked that exact question to Admiral Brett Giroir, and he said to me, after a bit of a pause, yes. And there are suspicions that China is doing that. Biological weapons are illegal. Nuclear weapons are not illegal. The Soviets signed the treaty, and then they began to build a colossal biological weapons program. The idea, which is so spooky, is that they wanted to kill all the people in America and the West and leave the infrastructure intact. Those were their words.” Annie Jacobsen

Shawn Ryan

85,267 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"What Your DNA Actually Does Is Mind Blowing" What do you know about your DNA? Why aren't we taught the importance of our DNA? What does DNA do? Memory? Why can't we remember past lives? What is everlasting life? What is consciousness? The body dies but what happens to the consciousness? If you could remember every life you've ever had from before and all to come is that Living Forever? ✨🧬

"What Your DNA Actually Does Is Mind Blowing" What do you know about your DNA? Why aren't we taught the importance of our DNA? What does DNA do? Memory? Why can't we remember past lives? What is everlasting life? What is consciousness? The body dies but what happens to the consciousness? If you could remember every life you've ever had from before and all to come is that Living Forever? ✨🧬

Drewski

219,401 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan Shares Summary of DNA Contamination Found in the COVID mRNA Vaccines & Preliminary Evidence of DNA Integration "The fact checkers who told you this DNA won't get into the cell are proven wrong by this data. We can see DNA in there. It's a very high copy number...We've also found two genome integrations. This has not been replicated like all of our qPCR data, so this is very early, but we have fusions of DNA between the spike sequence and Chromosome 12 and between the spike sequence and Chromosome 9. This needs to be confirmed with long read sequencers where we can span the entire integration event...But we shouldn't be seeing any of this...So a little bit more validation to do in this but still a little bit concerning." *From the 2/23/2024 International Crisis Summit-5 in Washington DC. Quote is taken from the 9:50 mark. ➡️chiefnerd

Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan Shares Summary of DNA Contamination Found in the COVID mRNA Vaccines & Preliminary Evidence of DNA Integration "The fact checkers who told you this DNA won't get into the cell are proven wrong by this data. We can see DNA in there. It's a very high copy number...We've also found two genome integrations. This has not been replicated like all of our qPCR data, so this is very early, but we have fusions of DNA between the spike sequence and Chromosome 12 and between the spike sequence and Chromosome 9. This needs to be confirmed with long read sequencers where we can span the entire integration event...But we shouldn't be seeing any of this...So a little bit more validation to do in this but still a little bit concerning." *From the 2/23/2024 International Crisis Summit-5 in Washington DC. Quote is taken from the 9:50 mark. ➡️chiefnerd

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

20,109 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Have you ever seen how DNA is organized? It's astounding. A single strand of your DNA, when stretched out, is ~2 meters, or ~6.5 feet long. If you stretched out all the DNA in your body end to end, it could cross the entire solar system, from the sun to Pluto, 17 times. You could wrap all your DNA around the Earth like a rubber band ball almost 2 million times. The storage capacity of DNA is so high that all the world’s digital data (estimated around 175 zettabytes by 2025) could theoretically be stored in just 178lbs of DNA. Imagine, one single server that could handle the entire world's annual data needs. And yet, all of this fits inside the nucleus of a cell, invisible to the naked eye. How is that even possible? To prevent DNA from becoming an tangled mess, unusable for anything, it is organized and packed very specifically. If not for this organization, DNA would be completely unusable for any of Life's processes. It would clump together, unable to be pulled apart to be read by the many interacting molecular systems. To start, smaller segments of DNA are coiled tightly around a special protein called a Histone, whose sole job is to keep DNA organized. This coiled product is called a Nucleosome, which are then further coiled and packed together into long fibers call Chromatin. Chromatin then is further coiled into larger structures called Chromosomes. This organization is not only incredibly efficient, but it also provides functionality to the DNA itself. Chromosome and Chromatin architecture actually effects how DNA functions and communicates with the different systems in the cell, and the number of chromosomes is important to overall function of the DNA in an organism. Without this specific organization, Life could not exist. What does this mean? This means DNA could not have evolved and functioned without simultaneous organization. And DNA can't be organized without the proteins and systems that hold it all together. On top of that, the fact that how DNA is organized affects its function is a clear sign of foresight and planning - all clear signs of intelligent design. The more we learn about molecular biology, the more obvious it is that this was all Created intelligently.

Have you ever seen how DNA is organized? It's astounding. A single strand of your DNA, when stretched out, is ~2 meters, or ~6.5 feet long. If you stretched out all the DNA in your body end to end, it could cross the entire solar system, from the sun to Pluto, 17 times. You could wrap all your DNA around the Earth like a rubber band ball almost 2 million times. The storage capacity of DNA is so high that all the world’s digital data (estimated around 175 zettabytes by 2025) could theoretically be stored in just 178lbs of DNA. Imagine, one single server that could handle the entire world's annual data needs. And yet, all of this fits inside the nucleus of a cell, invisible to the naked eye. How is that even possible? To prevent DNA from becoming an tangled mess, unusable for anything, it is organized and packed very specifically. If not for this organization, DNA would be completely unusable for any of Life's processes. It would clump together, unable to be pulled apart to be read by the many interacting molecular systems. To start, smaller segments of DNA are coiled tightly around a special protein called a Histone, whose sole job is to keep DNA organized. This coiled product is called a Nucleosome, which are then further coiled and packed together into long fibers call Chromatin. Chromatin then is further coiled into larger structures called Chromosomes. This organization is not only incredibly efficient, but it also provides functionality to the DNA itself. Chromosome and Chromatin architecture actually effects how DNA functions and communicates with the different systems in the cell, and the number of chromosomes is important to overall function of the DNA in an organism. Without this specific organization, Life could not exist. What does this mean? This means DNA could not have evolved and functioned without simultaneous organization. And DNA can't be organized without the proteins and systems that hold it all together. On top of that, the fact that how DNA is organized affects its function is a clear sign of foresight and planning - all clear signs of intelligent design. The more we learn about molecular biology, the more obvious it is that this was all Created intelligently.

Divinely Designed

78,665 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

There is no blood, no skin, no tissue, no DNA found on a single piece or shard of taillight that the Commonwealth claims cut and sliced into John O’Keefe’s arm. Where is that trace evidence? Where is that biological evidence? The DNA? Where is it? They’ve got nothing! Not a single piece that the Commonwealth wants you to believe cut up John’s arm—how is that possible? #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead

There is no blood, no skin, no tissue, no DNA found on a single piece or shard of taillight that the Commonwealth claims cut and sliced into John O’Keefe’s arm. Where is that trace evidence? Where is that biological evidence? The DNA? Where is it? They’ve got nothing! Not a single piece that the Commonwealth wants you to believe cut up John’s arm—how is that possible? #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

24,279 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

EXCLUSIVE: Scene of Nancy Guthrie private lab testing. I’m outside DNA Labs International where the DNA Testing of evidence is happening right now. I traveled to Deerfield Beach, Florida where lab technicians have been testing critical evidence in the investigation — including the glove found nearly 2 miles from her home. We’ve heard a lot about the discrepancies of sending this type of DNA evidence to a private lab versus a lab used by the FBI, but the Pima County Sheriff, Chris Nanos, says this is their protocol, and a lab that they have used for years. There are only a limited number of private accredited DNA labs in the country capable of this level of forensic work. If possible, DNA Labs International will develop a DNA profile from the glove. According to independent DNA consultant Suzanna Ryan of Ryan Forensic, which is not connected to this case but can speak about how this all works, once a profile is developed it will most likely be sent to the Arizona Department of Public Safety. That’s where the quality control process begins: •A qualified DNA analyst or CODIS administrator verifies the data •The profile must meet strict standards before upload •Once approved, it is electronically transmitted through state systems to the Federal Bureau of Investigation •All systems work together within the national DNA database network CODIS This extra verification step can take time — but it’s critical to ensure the data is admissible and accurate. In this exclusive video, I take you to the scene of where this testing is being done. Because the lab sits on private property, we were asked to leave by property management — but this is where the forensic work is happening. More to come on my YouTube Channel The Ingle Edit and on NewsNation

Laura Ingle

202,689 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Kearney Disinformation Correction Yesterday, Aidan Kearney attempted to attack the lack of canine DNA detected on John's clothing by tweeting two misleading claims. 1. Canine Swab Collection Kearney Disinformation: Michael Proctor was the source of DNA collected. Factual Information: The swabs were neither from Proctor's body nor collected by him. The swabs were collected by Maureen Hartnett at the MSP crime lab from John's shirt per instructions of Teri Kuhn at UC Davis and were received packaged appropriately. 2. Inhibitors Caused The Lack of Canine DNA Kearney Disinformation: There were inhibitors on John's clothing that masked the presence of canine DNA. Factual Information: UC Davis was asked to perform two tests: a nuclear DNA test which would be used to identify a specific animal and, if the nuclear DNA test failed to yield results, a mitochondrial DNA test called Meat ID to determine presence of DNA from a variety of species. Nuclear DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell and only 2 copies exist whereas mitochondrial DNA is found in the cytoplasm and is significantly more abundant with hundreds of thousands of copies. Nuclear DNA tests are far more accurate in determining the exact source, ie one dog from another dog, whereas mitochondrial DNA is less specific but will be able to determine if DNA from a specific animal species is present. In this case, the presence of DNA from 12 different animal species, including canine and pig, was tested. The results of the QPCR testing for nuclear DNA were that the swabs "did not indicate the presence of canine (nuclear) DNA, but did indicate the presence of inhibitors. This result is obtained when 1. Canine DNA is degraded, 2. The DNA is obscured by inhibitors, or 3. There is no nuclear DNA present." The less specific test using mitochondrial DNA, Meat ID, was then completed. This test showed no canine DNA and further, showed no inhibitors. In other words, had canine DNA been present, it would have been identified on the Meat ID mitochondrial testing since there were no inhibitors. The below video contains questioning from both the defense and prosecution supporting the identified factual information.

Kearney Disinformation Correction Yesterday, Aidan Kearney attempted to attack the lack of canine DNA detected on John's clothing by tweeting two misleading claims. 1. Canine Swab Collection Kearney Disinformation: Michael Proctor was the source of DNA collected. Factual Information: The swabs were neither from Proctor's body nor collected by him. The swabs were collected by Maureen Hartnett at the MSP crime lab from John's shirt per instructions of Teri Kuhn at UC Davis and were received packaged appropriately. 2. Inhibitors Caused The Lack of Canine DNA Kearney Disinformation: There were inhibitors on John's clothing that masked the presence of canine DNA. Factual Information: UC Davis was asked to perform two tests: a nuclear DNA test which would be used to identify a specific animal and, if the nuclear DNA test failed to yield results, a mitochondrial DNA test called Meat ID to determine presence of DNA from a variety of species. Nuclear DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell and only 2 copies exist whereas mitochondrial DNA is found in the cytoplasm and is significantly more abundant with hundreds of thousands of copies. Nuclear DNA tests are far more accurate in determining the exact source, ie one dog from another dog, whereas mitochondrial DNA is less specific but will be able to determine if DNA from a specific animal species is present. In this case, the presence of DNA from 12 different animal species, including canine and pig, was tested. The results of the QPCR testing for nuclear DNA were that the swabs "did not indicate the presence of canine (nuclear) DNA, but did indicate the presence of inhibitors. This result is obtained when 1. Canine DNA is degraded, 2. The DNA is obscured by inhibitors, or 3. There is no nuclear DNA present." The less specific test using mitochondrial DNA, Meat ID, was then completed. This test showed no canine DNA and further, showed no inhibitors. In other words, had canine DNA been present, it would have been identified on the Meat ID mitochondrial testing since there were no inhibitors. The below video contains questioning from both the defense and prosecution supporting the identified factual information.

Julie Carpenter

10,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

The All-In Podcast

79,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Nancy Grace warns sending crucial DNA to a private lab could risk destroying limited evidence, questioning why it’s not being handled by the FBI: “There are cases where DNA is sent to a particular lab, a specialty lab, a lab that could have expertise in diluted, destroyed, old, or degraded DNA. But even if that’s why he’s hanging his hat on an excuse to send it to a private lab in Florida, they don’t have anything that the FBI doesn’t have, so that’s not going to wash. If there’s a small amount of DNA inside one of those gloves and it is sent to a lab for testing, that DNA could be used up in the testing. So what I’m saying is, if that lab in Florida uses up that touch DNA, it’s over. Does he not realize what he is risking? He needs to go back to his basketball game.”

Nancy Grace warns sending crucial DNA to a private lab could risk destroying limited evidence, questioning why it’s not being handled by the FBI: “There are cases where DNA is sent to a particular lab, a specialty lab, a lab that could have expertise in diluted, destroyed, old, or degraded DNA. But even if that’s why he’s hanging his hat on an excuse to send it to a private lab in Florida, they don’t have anything that the FBI doesn’t have, so that’s not going to wash. If there’s a small amount of DNA inside one of those gloves and it is sent to a lab for testing, that DNA could be used up in the testing. So what I’m saying is, if that lab in Florida uses up that touch DNA, it’s over. Does he not realize what he is risking? He needs to go back to his basketball game.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

600,421 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not consider the presence of the SV40 promoter to be a safety concern either before or after the product is subjected to DNA digestion and purification.” And “The TGA is unable to provide the sequences requested as they are commercial in confidence.” (See comments)” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Turns out the previous answers like this answer were no answers by claiming commercial in confidence. In light of the evidence released last week via FOI where the TGA admitted that: “foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage/repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination. Exogenous DNA can potentially be incorporated using these processes.” It is clear the TGA have been caught lying again. The SV40 is a promoter that can initiate DNA replication, so the SV40 promoter has to be a safety concern. Given no carcinogenic testing was carried out then the TGA can’t rule out anything. Furthermore the genetic sequence of the plasmids should not be commercial in confidence. Luckily the sequence has already been released via scientists in Canada. The TGA are again protecting big pharma instead of protecting the people. #auspol #australia #tga #health

“The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not consider the presence of the SV40 promoter to be a safety concern either before or after the product is subjected to DNA digestion and purification.” And “The TGA is unable to provide the sequences requested as they are commercial in confidence.” (See comments)” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Turns out the previous answers like this answer were no answers by claiming commercial in confidence. In light of the evidence released last week via FOI where the TGA admitted that: “foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage/repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination. Exogenous DNA can potentially be incorporated using these processes.” It is clear the TGA have been caught lying again. The SV40 is a promoter that can initiate DNA replication, so the SV40 promoter has to be a safety concern. Given no carcinogenic testing was carried out then the TGA can’t rule out anything. Furthermore the genetic sequence of the plasmids should not be commercial in confidence. Luckily the sequence has already been released via scientists in Canada. The TGA are again protecting big pharma instead of protecting the people. #auspol #australia #tga #health

Gerard Rennick

27,152 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚩 NOW - Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan Shares a Summary of the DNA Contamination Found in the COVID mRNA Vaccines & Preliminary Evidence of DNA Integration "The fact checkers who told you this DNA won't get into the cell are proven wrong by this data. We can see DNA in there. It's a very high copy number...We've also found two genome integrations. This has not been replicated like all of our qPCR data, so this is very early, but we have fusions of DNA between the spike sequence and Chromosome 12 and between the spike sequence and Chromosome 9. This needs to be confirmed with long read sequencers where we can span the entire integration event...But we shouldn't be seeing any of this...So a little bit more validation to do in this but still a little bit concerning." *From the 2/23/2024 International Crisis Summit-5 (ICS-5) in Washington DC. Quote is taken from the 9:50 mark. Kevin McKernan Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD

🚩 NOW - Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan Shares a Summary of the DNA Contamination Found in the COVID mRNA Vaccines & Preliminary Evidence of DNA Integration "The fact checkers who told you this DNA won't get into the cell are proven wrong by this data. We can see DNA in there. It's a very high copy number...We've also found two genome integrations. This has not been replicated like all of our qPCR data, so this is very early, but we have fusions of DNA between the spike sequence and Chromosome 12 and between the spike sequence and Chromosome 9. This needs to be confirmed with long read sequencers where we can span the entire integration event...But we shouldn't be seeing any of this...So a little bit more validation to do in this but still a little bit concerning." *From the 2/23/2024 International Crisis Summit-5 (ICS-5) in Washington DC. Quote is taken from the 9:50 mark. Kevin McKernan Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD

Chief Nerd

727,603 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The DNA is not delayed by mohbad's wife, the court records are there to confirm this Wumi is not trying to get mohbad's money, she is representing him on a case that he took to court before he died Wunmi does not have access to mohbad's body to go take a sample for the DNA Ratels, VDM and intelligent Nigerians no insult, counter with evidence

The DNA is not delayed by mohbad's wife, the court records are there to confirm this Wumi is not trying to get mohbad's money, she is representing him on a case that he took to court before he died Wunmi does not have access to mohbad's body to go take a sample for the DNA Ratels, VDM and intelligent Nigerians no insult, counter with evidence

Prince Shegs (Omo Olumo)

13,255 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

🚨 JUST NOW: The Tyler Robinson defense is PANICKING, objecting to the release of evidence involving transgender lover Lance Twiggs in the Kirk assassination hearing They even found a towel matching the DNA of BOTH Robinson and Twiggs on-scene 🤯 Justice for Charlie Kirk means NO MORE DELAYS and release it ALL. All evidence points to SHUT-AND-DRY CASE. The liars are sweating right now. "You can tell a lot by what the defense is concerned with by what they've been objecting to...this recorded statement from Lance Twiggs."

🚨 JUST NOW: The Tyler Robinson defense is PANICKING, objecting to the release of evidence involving transgender lover Lance Twiggs in the Kirk assassination hearing They even found a towel matching the DNA of BOTH Robinson and Twiggs on-scene 🤯 Justice for Charlie Kirk means NO MORE DELAYS and release it ALL. All evidence points to SHUT-AND-DRY CASE. The liars are sweating right now. "You can tell a lot by what the defense is concerned with by what they've been objecting to...this recorded statement from Lance Twiggs."

Eric Daugherty

106,809 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Professor Emeritus Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University of Science: "It is almost certain that vaccines are contaminated with DNA. mRNA vaccines containing the DNA causes turbo cancers." Professor Murakami explains the mechanism of turbo cancers: The covid vaccines are expected to contain only mRNA. However, it has been proven that the vaccines contain considerable amounts of DNA and other substances that should not be present. There is no doubt about it now. DNA can enter human cells very easily, regardless of length, and can get into cells everywhere. When DNA gets in the center of an important gene, the important gene will stop functioning. One problem is that the mRNA vaccine of Pfizer contains a promoter sequence of the cancer virus called SV40. This sequence could enter the human genome, and awakens and activates dormant carcinogenic genes. As a result, the risk of developing cancer increases. mRNA vaccines increase the risk of developing cancer while suppressing the immunity. Vaccination increases the risk of developing cancer dramatically compared to the unvaccinated state. The more people get vaccinated, the more people will probably get cancer. Vaccines appear to increase the risk of all types of cancers. There is credible information that the number of leukemia cases is on the rise. Vaccination causes the promoter sequence of the cancer virus to enter white blood cells and attach to red blood cells everywhere. As a result, more and more leukemia cases are reported. A lot of spikes of mRNA are produced. The spikes would be most protected from destruction. Possibly, long spike genes remain intact. So, if the long spike genes remain there, gene expression will continue to take place all the time. That is, spikes are generated forever. Once the DNA gets into the stem cells, the DNA will keep creating more and more spikes. As a result, IgG4 antibodies are induced. The number of spike-producing cells will not decrease, and it becomes impossible to get rid of spike-producing cells. As a results, It becomes normal for spikes to be present in cells. The produced spikes then flow into the bloodstream and cause a variety of health problems. So, any vaccine that induces IgG4 is deemed as a defective vaccine, and should no longer be produced. Normally, cancer cells are born and grow slowly. However, the vaccine suppresses the immunity, which makes it easier for cancer cells to grow. The vaccines cause turbo cancers. Suppression of the immunity is a major factor of turbo cancers. The increase in IgG4 antibodies results in suppression of cancer immunity. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more intense the inflammation caused by the vaccine becomes. DNA is a foreign substance to the cells. So, DNA causes a severe reaction and kills the immune system of the cells. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more severe the side effects caused by the vaccine become. Vaccines could contain many different impurities, but one possibility could be DNA. In the first place, DNA is something that should not be put into cells of your body.

Professor Emeritus Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University of Science: "It is almost certain that vaccines are contaminated with DNA. mRNA vaccines containing the DNA causes turbo cancers." Professor Murakami explains the mechanism of turbo cancers: The covid vaccines are expected to contain only mRNA. However, it has been proven that the vaccines contain considerable amounts of DNA and other substances that should not be present. There is no doubt about it now. DNA can enter human cells very easily, regardless of length, and can get into cells everywhere. When DNA gets in the center of an important gene, the important gene will stop functioning. One problem is that the mRNA vaccine of Pfizer contains a promoter sequence of the cancer virus called SV40. This sequence could enter the human genome, and awakens and activates dormant carcinogenic genes. As a result, the risk of developing cancer increases. mRNA vaccines increase the risk of developing cancer while suppressing the immunity. Vaccination increases the risk of developing cancer dramatically compared to the unvaccinated state. The more people get vaccinated, the more people will probably get cancer. Vaccines appear to increase the risk of all types of cancers. There is credible information that the number of leukemia cases is on the rise. Vaccination causes the promoter sequence of the cancer virus to enter white blood cells and attach to red blood cells everywhere. As a result, more and more leukemia cases are reported. A lot of spikes of mRNA are produced. The spikes would be most protected from destruction. Possibly, long spike genes remain intact. So, if the long spike genes remain there, gene expression will continue to take place all the time. That is, spikes are generated forever. Once the DNA gets into the stem cells, the DNA will keep creating more and more spikes. As a result, IgG4 antibodies are induced. The number of spike-producing cells will not decrease, and it becomes impossible to get rid of spike-producing cells. As a results, It becomes normal for spikes to be present in cells. The produced spikes then flow into the bloodstream and cause a variety of health problems. So, any vaccine that induces IgG4 is deemed as a defective vaccine, and should no longer be produced. Normally, cancer cells are born and grow slowly. However, the vaccine suppresses the immunity, which makes it easier for cancer cells to grow. The vaccines cause turbo cancers. Suppression of the immunity is a major factor of turbo cancers. The increase in IgG4 antibodies results in suppression of cancer immunity. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more intense the inflammation caused by the vaccine becomes. DNA is a foreign substance to the cells. So, DNA causes a severe reaction and kills the immune system of the cells. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more severe the side effects caused by the vaccine become. Vaccines could contain many different impurities, but one possibility could be DNA. In the first place, DNA is something that should not be put into cells of your body.

You

574,563 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#Ukraine forced #mobilization This one was all alone against a bunch of recruiters. Seems he tried to make a phone call but was rapidly overwhelmed by the "vultures" . Sadly the ppl on the tram chose not to help.

#Ukraine forced #mobilization This one was all alone against a bunch of recruiters. Seems he tried to make a phone call but was rapidly overwhelmed by the "vultures" . Sadly the ppl on the tram chose not to help.

Arthur Morgan

14,105 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but these are in very small quantities, measured in nanograms - Counterargument: Even though the DNA fragments may be in small quantities, their presence still poses a risk. DNA integration into the genome, even in small quantities, could still have long-term, unpredictable effects that we are not yet fully aware of. LIE #2: Impossibility of DNA entering human DNA: For these DNA fragments to integrate into our DNA, they would have to overcome several barriers, including crossing the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, which is virtually impossible - Counterargument: The entire purpose of the LNP (lipid nanoparticle) in mRNA vaccines is to allow for the mRNA to enter the cytoplasm in order to transcribe the desired proteins. While fragments integrating into human DNA might be low, it's not "impossible." Scientific literature on gene editing technologies, like CRISPR, demonstrates that foreign DNA can be integrated into the genome under certain conditions. LIE #3: Role of innate immune system in rejecting foreign DNA: The innate immune system and enzymes in the cytoplasm work to destroy foreign DNA - Counterargument: While our immune system does recognize and destroy some foreign DNA, the immune response isn't perfect, especially if the foreign DNA is introduced in a manner that is not immediately recognized such as via the LNP. In certain environments or under specific conditions, foreign DNA can evade immune detection. LIE #4: Lack of integrases in mRNA vaccine DNA: The DNA fragments in the mRNA vaccine do not have the necessary integrases to integrate into our genome - Counterargument: While the fragments might lack integrases, it's possible that they could still interact with the genome in other ways, for example, through epigenetic changes or by influencing gene expression as is commonly achieved in laboratory settings. LIE #5: Comparison to naturally occurring foreign DNA: We are constantly exposed to foreign DNA through our food from bacteria, plants, and animals, which is much larger and more abundant than the DNA in vaccines - Counterargument: Although we are exposed to foreign DNA regularly through the digestive tract, the introduction of DNA through vaccination is a more controlled and concentrated process. The body is not naturally prepared to deal with such DNA in the same way it handles the ingestion of plant or animal DNA. LIE #6: Fear-mongering accusation: The physician scientist who raised these concerns was just scaring people unnecessarily - Counterargument: Raising concerns about potential risks is an important part of scientific discourse, especially when it comes to public health. It's better to err on the side of caution and investigate these possibilities rather than dismissing concerns outright, especially when the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are still being studied. LIE #7: Assurance that these risks are negligible: The DNA fragments from the vaccines are clinically harmless - Counterargument: The assertion that these fragments are harmless is premature. Without long-term studies specifically addressing the potential risks of vaccine-derived DNA integration, it's impossible to claim with certainty that there will be no adverse effects in the future. Paul Offit knows all of this, so WHY IS HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC? Please share this important video with everyone you know and DEMAND TRANSPARENT RESEARCH INTO THE QUESTION OF DNA CONTAMINATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE #COVID #vaccinated POPULATION! @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Danny Jones Bret Weinstein Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan John Campbell Robert F. Kennedy Jr Steve Kirsch #AwfulOffit

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but these are in very small quantities, measured in nanograms - Counterargument: Even though the DNA fragments may be in small quantities, their presence still poses a risk. DNA integration into the genome, even in small quantities, could still have long-term, unpredictable effects that we are not yet fully aware of. LIE #2: Impossibility of DNA entering human DNA: For these DNA fragments to integrate into our DNA, they would have to overcome several barriers, including crossing the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, which is virtually impossible - Counterargument: The entire purpose of the LNP (lipid nanoparticle) in mRNA vaccines is to allow for the mRNA to enter the cytoplasm in order to transcribe the desired proteins. While fragments integrating into human DNA might be low, it's not "impossible." Scientific literature on gene editing technologies, like CRISPR, demonstrates that foreign DNA can be integrated into the genome under certain conditions. LIE #3: Role of innate immune system in rejecting foreign DNA: The innate immune system and enzymes in the cytoplasm work to destroy foreign DNA - Counterargument: While our immune system does recognize and destroy some foreign DNA, the immune response isn't perfect, especially if the foreign DNA is introduced in a manner that is not immediately recognized such as via the LNP. In certain environments or under specific conditions, foreign DNA can evade immune detection. LIE #4: Lack of integrases in mRNA vaccine DNA: The DNA fragments in the mRNA vaccine do not have the necessary integrases to integrate into our genome - Counterargument: While the fragments might lack integrases, it's possible that they could still interact with the genome in other ways, for example, through epigenetic changes or by influencing gene expression as is commonly achieved in laboratory settings. LIE #5: Comparison to naturally occurring foreign DNA: We are constantly exposed to foreign DNA through our food from bacteria, plants, and animals, which is much larger and more abundant than the DNA in vaccines - Counterargument: Although we are exposed to foreign DNA regularly through the digestive tract, the introduction of DNA through vaccination is a more controlled and concentrated process. The body is not naturally prepared to deal with such DNA in the same way it handles the ingestion of plant or animal DNA. LIE #6: Fear-mongering accusation: The physician scientist who raised these concerns was just scaring people unnecessarily - Counterargument: Raising concerns about potential risks is an important part of scientific discourse, especially when it comes to public health. It's better to err on the side of caution and investigate these possibilities rather than dismissing concerns outright, especially when the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are still being studied. LIE #7: Assurance that these risks are negligible: The DNA fragments from the vaccines are clinically harmless - Counterargument: The assertion that these fragments are harmless is premature. Without long-term studies specifically addressing the potential risks of vaccine-derived DNA integration, it's impossible to claim with certainty that there will be no adverse effects in the future. Paul Offit knows all of this, so WHY IS HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC? Please share this important video with everyone you know and DEMAND TRANSPARENT RESEARCH INTO THE QUESTION OF DNA CONTAMINATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE #COVID #vaccinated POPULATION! @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Danny Jones Bret Weinstein Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan John Campbell Robert F. Kennedy Jr Steve Kirsch #AwfulOffit

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

338,876 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr