What are your thoughts on this? 😳⬇️

Just ignore recent photographs taken by multiple countries of the lunar lander sites. And if you ignore all the radio transmissions that came from the Moon picked up by multiple countries at the time of The landings.

you might like this

Dude spends a little too much time in Mom’s basement

no it does not prove squat. They had lights behind them casting the astronots bold shadow. this is just silly.

"If I draw a shadow line incorrectly, I can fuel my mental masturbations!"

The other light source came from the various light sources on the lunar lander.

Also umm they’re on the dammm moon 🌖 with lights from the ship, don’t know if you know the sun is big and physics blah blah physics blah blah

Most important point he makes is the B-52. I’ve been around them. I’ve been around new aircraft. I’ve been around that guppie that carried the space shuttle and they wouldn’t let anyone near it. Normally aerospace guys love sharing their planes with other plane nerds but apparently not this. Man I’ve sat in a U-2, F-35, F-22, the host of E-series acft, B-52s, blackhawks, even RAF aircraft but NASA won’t let a soul near their shuttles. Why? Don’t tell me it’s because we’d damage something. Or see something classified. We had classified stuff all over my aircraft but took civs on tours all the time. There are ways to cover sensitive systems and information. Anyway rant over… why did we destroy this tech instead of iterating upon it like we do everything else?

Bart Sibrel has dedicated his life to proving the moon landing hoax.. He is right.. One look at the lunar lander tells you all you need to know 🤣 Aluminium foil and duck tape piece of garbage

Lol !! You forgot to crop all of the shadow out of your pic . Just a little more cropping and you'll have it . 😃 😀 😄 😁 🤣 😂

Multiple light sources.