Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

What do builders and leaders need to learn to thrive in the Agentforce transformation? #Sponsored At Salesforce TDX, Joe Inzerillo made a clear point: we’re not just adding AI; we’re onboarding a new kind of labor. That changes everything about how we build software. I used to design →...

YuHelenYu's profile picture

Helen Yu

60,565 subscribers

15,849 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

#Sponsored
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

What does it mean to scale a team when part of your workforce is digital labor? #Sponsored At Salesforce TDX, I sat down with Brandon Metcalf, CEO of Asymbl, and what he shared challenged the assumption that growth is tied to headcount. Asymbl hired 116 people in 100 days with just two human recruiters. They processed 17,000 applications. And they ended up with lower attrition than most traditional hiring cycles produce. Today their workforce is 60% digital and they're scaling toward 1,000 digital workers, powered by Agentforce and anchored in Salesforce's security and reliability. Here is what that shift demands of leaders: ➡️ Less managing effort, more orchestrating outcomes ➡️ Less adding headcount, more multiplying capability ➡️ Less deploying software, more onboarding teammates The hardest part was belief in a different way of working, and the willingness to design for it before the rest of the world catches up. 👉 Watch our conversation here: #salesforcepartner #TDX26
1:20

What does it mean to scale a team when part of your workforce is digital labor? #Sponsored At Salesforce TDX, I sat down with Brandon Metcalf, CEO of Asymbl, and what he shared challenged the assumption that growth is tied to headcount. Asymbl hired 116 people in 100 days with just two human recruiters. They processed 17,000 applications. And they ended up with lower attrition than most traditional hiring cycles produce. Today their workforce is 60% digital and they're scaling toward 1,000 digital workers, powered by Agentforce and anchored in Salesforce's security and reliability. Here is what that shift demands of leaders: ➡️ Less managing effort, more orchestrating outcomes ➡️ Less adding headcount, more multiplying capability ➡️ Less deploying software, more onboarding teammates The hardest part was belief in a different way of working, and the willingness to design for it before the rest of the world catches up. 👉 Watch our conversation here: #salesforcepartner #TDX26

Helen Yu

11,974 views • 5 months ago

To design for the next billions of AI users we’ll need to rethink everything! From new contexts, geographies and ways to prompt — to what interfaces we build. Thoughts like this led to a conversation with Dheemanth Reddy on, “How do we bring AI to the next 6 billion people?”
3:55

To design for the next billions of AI users we’ll need to rethink everything! From new contexts, geographies and ways to prompt — to what interfaces we build. Thoughts like this led to a conversation with Dheemanth Reddy on, “How do we bring AI to the next 6 billion people?”

Ankit Chowdhary

15,590 views • 9 months ago

"Not a single one of our full-time engineers right now writes code anymore... it's all agentic... the way you build a company completely changes." JD Ross with Joe Lonsdale on the future of software: JD Ross: Not a single one of our full-time engineers right now writes code anymore. They do everything through Codex, Claude Code, or Cursor. Joe Lonsdale: It's all agentic. JD: It's all agentic. Joe: A lot of them are managing lots of agents at once, right? That's how they're working? JD: Yeah, Cole who runs our engineering team has six agents that are running at once at all times just doing different kind of projects. When we create a new ticket in Linear, it automatically kicks off this thing that basically creates a dev environment, which then tries to one shot the solution and then creates a PR that we review. The whole way you build software is changing so quickly. And I think right now the cost of software is just asymptotically dropping to zero... which means that the way you build a company completely changes. We can now have an enterprise customer come up who says, "Oh yeah, this is so close. What we actually need it for is X." We can build X in one day, ship it live, and close that deal. We did this last week... It's a completely different way of even thinking.
0:53

"Not a single one of our full-time engineers right now writes code anymore... it's all agentic... the way you build a company completely changes." JD Ross with Joe Lonsdale on the future of software: JD Ross: Not a single one of our full-time engineers right now writes code anymore. They do everything through Codex, Claude Code, or Cursor. Joe Lonsdale: It's all agentic. JD: It's all agentic. Joe: A lot of them are managing lots of agents at once, right? That's how they're working? JD: Yeah, Cole who runs our engineering team has six agents that are running at once at all times just doing different kind of projects. When we create a new ticket in Linear, it automatically kicks off this thing that basically creates a dev environment, which then tries to one shot the solution and then creates a PR that we review. The whole way you build software is changing so quickly. And I think right now the cost of software is just asymptotically dropping to zero... which means that the way you build a company completely changes. We can now have an enterprise customer come up who says, "Oh yeah, this is so close. What we actually need it for is X." We can build X in one day, ship it live, and close that deal. We did this last week... It's a completely different way of even thinking.

American Optimist

21,014 views • 7 months ago

After decades of building databases, Databricks VP of Engineering Nikita | Scaling Postgres believes it's time to rethink one of their fundamental assumptions. In this episode of the 𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘈𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘋𝘢𝘵𝘢 podcast, Nikita discusses why separating compute and storage is the next major architectural shift for operational databases, how storing data on object storage opens it to downstream systems, and why the rise of AI agents is changing how developers build software—and what they need from a database. Watch the full conversation:
1:26

After decades of building databases, Databricks VP of Engineering Nikita | Scaling Postgres believes it's time to rethink one of their fundamental assumptions. In this episode of the 𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘈𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘋𝘢𝘵𝘢 podcast, Nikita discusses why separating compute and storage is the next major architectural shift for operational databases, how storing data on object storage opens it to downstream systems, and why the rise of AI agents is changing how developers build software—and what they need from a database. Watch the full conversation:

Databricks

10,503 views • 3 months ago

Former Goldman Sachs executive Raoul Pal explains how AI is going to eat traditional software/SAAS. If your product is just software, agentic AI can reproduce it on demand, optimize it, and redeploy it to a better market. "Agentic AI means it’s like having Fiverr, a website of experts you can ask any question. It’ll go away and do the task.... Agentic AI will build, design the website, code it, register the domain name, figure out the branding, figure out the marketing, figure out the email list, figure out the whole thing. So then you and I are in competition. You’ve built this incredible new website. I just go to my AI and say, “Love Steven’s website. Can you just build it better. Boom. 3 minutes. How can we be entrepreneurs in software? Now there’s this theory going around that AI is going to eat software, and I kind of get it." ---- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Raoul Pal The Journey Man' YT channel. (link in comment)
1:11

Former Goldman Sachs executive Raoul Pal explains how AI is going to eat traditional software/SAAS. If your product is just software, agentic AI can reproduce it on demand, optimize it, and redeploy it to a better market. "Agentic AI means it’s like having Fiverr, a website of experts you can ask any question. It’ll go away and do the task.... Agentic AI will build, design the website, code it, register the domain name, figure out the branding, figure out the marketing, figure out the email list, figure out the whole thing. So then you and I are in competition. You’ve built this incredible new website. I just go to my AI and say, “Love Steven’s website. Can you just build it better. Boom. 3 minutes. How can we be entrepreneurs in software? Now there’s this theory going around that AI is going to eat software, and I kind of get it." ---- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Raoul Pal The Journey Man' YT channel. (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

15,205 views • 2 days ago

Former Goldman Sachs executive Raoul Pal explains how AI is going to eat traditional software/SAAS. If your product is just software, agentic AI can reproduce it on demand, optimize it, and redeploy it to a better market. "Agentic AI means it’s like having Fiverr, a website of experts you can ask any question. It’ll go away and do the task.... Agentic AI will build, design the website, code it, register the domain name, figure out the branding, figure out the marketing, figure out the email list, figure out the whole thing. So then you and I are in competition. You’ve built this incredible new website. I just go to my AI and say, “Love Steven’s website. Can you just build it better. Boom. 3 minutes. How can we be entrepreneurs in software? Now there’s this theory going around that AI is going to eat software, and I kind of get it." ---- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Raoul Pal The Journey Man' YT channel. (link in comment)
1:11

Former Goldman Sachs executive Raoul Pal explains how AI is going to eat traditional software/SAAS. If your product is just software, agentic AI can reproduce it on demand, optimize it, and redeploy it to a better market. "Agentic AI means it’s like having Fiverr, a website of experts you can ask any question. It’ll go away and do the task.... Agentic AI will build, design the website, code it, register the domain name, figure out the branding, figure out the marketing, figure out the email list, figure out the whole thing. So then you and I are in competition. You’ve built this incredible new website. I just go to my AI and say, “Love Steven’s website. Can you just build it better. Boom. 3 minutes. How can we be entrepreneurs in software? Now there’s this theory going around that AI is going to eat software, and I kind of get it." ---- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Raoul Pal The Journey Man' YT channel. (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

48,418 views • 6 months ago

Former Goldman Sachs executive Raoul Pal explains how AI is going to eat traditional software/SAAS. If your product is just software, agentic AI can reproduce it on demand, optimize it, and redeploy it to a better market. "Agentic AI means it’s like having Fiverr, a website of experts you can ask any question. It’ll go away and do the task.... Agentic AI will build, design the website, code it, register the domain name, figure out the branding, figure out the marketing, figure out the email list, figure out the whole thing. So then you and I are in competition. You’ve built this incredible new website. I just go to my AI and say, “Love Steven’s website. Can you just build it better. Boom. 3 minutes. How can we be entrepreneurs in software? Now there’s this theory going around that AI is going to eat software, and I kind of get it." ---- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Raoul Pal The Journey Man' YT channel. (link in comment)
1:11

Former Goldman Sachs executive Raoul Pal explains how AI is going to eat traditional software/SAAS. If your product is just software, agentic AI can reproduce it on demand, optimize it, and redeploy it to a better market. "Agentic AI means it’s like having Fiverr, a website of experts you can ask any question. It’ll go away and do the task.... Agentic AI will build, design the website, code it, register the domain name, figure out the branding, figure out the marketing, figure out the email list, figure out the whole thing. So then you and I are in competition. You’ve built this incredible new website. I just go to my AI and say, “Love Steven’s website. Can you just build it better. Boom. 3 minutes. How can we be entrepreneurs in software? Now there’s this theory going around that AI is going to eat software, and I kind of get it." ---- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Raoul Pal The Journey Man' YT channel. (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

17,215 views • 3 months ago

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)
0:59

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

16,584 views • 4 months ago

As a millennial, I don’t think we fully realize the power we hold yet. The average age in America is 38. That means if millennials really showed up, we could flip the scales in politics. In Black communities especially, we have to work the soil of politics to turn out our generation if we want to see the harvest in our lifetime. If we’re up to bat, we need to be clear about the kind of leaders we’re calling for. We have to have hard and honest conversations with each other. Too often, we’ve looked for leadership in a certain package or personality. But in this climate, we need leaders who are strategic and willing to fight for the best interest of the people. “Nice” leadership has given us the results we see today. Just some food for thought this Sunday. Always a good conversation with my friend @drkeyhallmon. Check out the full conversation on @baldwinandcompany YouTube.
0:42

As a millennial, I don’t think we fully realize the power we hold yet. The average age in America is 38. That means if millennials really showed up, we could flip the scales in politics. In Black communities especially, we have to work the soil of politics to turn out our generation if we want to see the harvest in our lifetime. If we’re up to bat, we need to be clear about the kind of leaders we’re calling for. We have to have hard and honest conversations with each other. Too often, we’ve looked for leadership in a certain package or personality. But in this climate, we need leaders who are strategic and willing to fight for the best interest of the people. “Nice” leadership has given us the results we see today. Just some food for thought this Sunday. Always a good conversation with my friend @drkeyhallmon. Check out the full conversation on @baldwinandcompany YouTube.

Gary Chambers

11,560 views • 1 year ago

This is to all the software developers that have reached out to me on how to contribute to manufacturing: Build CAD/CAM/CAE alternatives to the industry benchmarks we have out there (SolidWorks, Fusion360, Siemens NX and many more). This is what helps build our manufacturing might and makes us stronger. I know we have no shortage of talent here. Need some players who can build and are in it for the long haul. Stop chasing those low-hanging, ultra-competitive fruits. I should be able to do this on your software:
0:39

This is to all the software developers that have reached out to me on how to contribute to manufacturing: Build CAD/CAM/CAE alternatives to the industry benchmarks we have out there (SolidWorks, Fusion360, Siemens NX and many more). This is what helps build our manufacturing might and makes us stronger. I know we have no shortage of talent here. Need some players who can build and are in it for the long haul. Stop chasing those low-hanging, ultra-competitive fruits. I should be able to do this on your software:

Vishakh Ranotra

16,065 views • 1 year ago

As agentic automation helps developers get more done, the role is evolving toward higher-level decisions about what to build, how systems should work, and where taste and creativity matter most. Databricks Co-founder Patrick Wendell, OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger 🦞, and Codex engineering lead Tibo discuss what that shift means for enterprises building, governing, and scaling fleets of AI agents in production. Watch the full conversation:
2:06

As agentic automation helps developers get more done, the role is evolving toward higher-level decisions about what to build, how systems should work, and where taste and creativity matter most. Databricks Co-founder Patrick Wendell, OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger 🦞, and Codex engineering lead Tibo discuss what that shift means for enterprises building, governing, and scaling fleets of AI agents in production. Watch the full conversation:

Databricks

13,419 views • 1 month ago

One line from Prasanna Sankar has stayed with me: "You're not helping AI anymore. You're getting in the way by being in the way." That's exactly why he's building Vorflux Not another AI coding assistant. His vision is an autonomous AI software engineer that can build software with minimal human involvement. Coming from someone who was India's #1 competitive programmer, helped build Rippling into a $15B company, and once turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer, it's a perspective worth paying attention to. In this conversation, we go deep on: • Why AI has already surpassed humans at software engineering. • Why tools like Cursor and Claude Code are only the beginning—and how Vorflux is thinking differently. • Why the engineer of the future becomes a "builder." • The story behind building Rippling and starting over from scratch. • Why he turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer. • Why he believes we're moving toward zero-employee companies. • What humans will be uniquely valuable for in an AI-first world. One of the most thought-provoking conversations I've had on AI and the future of software. Full conversation is now live on the 1947 Rise Podcast. Link in comments Prasanna S Vorflux
1:21

One line from Prasanna Sankar has stayed with me: "You're not helping AI anymore. You're getting in the way by being in the way." That's exactly why he's building Vorflux Not another AI coding assistant. His vision is an autonomous AI software engineer that can build software with minimal human involvement. Coming from someone who was India's #1 competitive programmer, helped build Rippling into a $15B company, and once turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer, it's a perspective worth paying attention to. In this conversation, we go deep on: • Why AI has already surpassed humans at software engineering. • Why tools like Cursor and Claude Code are only the beginning—and how Vorflux is thinking differently. • Why the engineer of the future becomes a "builder." • The story behind building Rippling and starting over from scratch. • Why he turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer. • Why he believes we're moving toward zero-employee companies. • What humans will be uniquely valuable for in an AI-first world. One of the most thought-provoking conversations I've had on AI and the future of software. Full conversation is now live on the 1947 Rise Podcast. Link in comments Prasanna S Vorflux

Shiva Singh Sangwan

72,216 views • 2 months ago

This is awesome for those learning to build AI Agents: It's a challenge where you'll need to build an autonomous agent to survive in a world full of zombies. It's super fun, and it's 10x better than reading yet another tutorial. Here, you'll need to write code if you want to solve the problem. This challenge is sponsored by OutSystems, a platform for building and deploying enterprise-grade software. They have the Agent Workbench that you can use to build agentic systems. To join the challenge, you can visit:
3:05

This is awesome for those learning to build AI Agents: It's a challenge where you'll need to build an autonomous agent to survive in a world full of zombies. It's super fun, and it's 10x better than reading yet another tutorial. Here, you'll need to write code if you want to solve the problem. This challenge is sponsored by OutSystems, a platform for building and deploying enterprise-grade software. They have the Agent Workbench that you can use to build agentic systems. To join the challenge, you can visit:

Santiago

22,531 views • 11 months ago

🦋 Last week, our team took delivery of a new quadruped robotic dog from Unitree — the Unitree Go 2 AIR. With Letta and the Animus framework, developers can build embodied agents that think, learn, and act in the real world. Watch how we plan to bring Animus to life on this new hardware. Build 🤖 on Animus
3:22

🦋 Last week, our team took delivery of a new quadruped robotic dog from Unitree — the Unitree Go 2 AIR. With Letta and the Animus framework, developers can build embodied agents that think, learn, and act in the real world. Watch how we plan to bring Animus to life on this new hardware. Build 🤖 on Animus

Animus

33,084 views • 11 months ago

Every once in a while, you have a conversation that lingers, not just because of what’s spoken, but because of how deeply it reframes your thinking. My recent conversation with Vishal Sikka was exactly that. From leading SAP’s HANA revolution and driving Infosys’ transformation to now reimagining enterprise AI at Vianai Systems, Inc., Vishal has lived at the intersection of technology, philosophy and leadership. We spoke about what “enterprise-grade AI” really means in a world obsessed with speed over reliability, why enterprises are more like mangrove forests than machines (intricate, resilient & capable of withstanding shocks) and how India can shape the future of AI through its unique blend of scale, talent and systems thinking. Besides, if there’s anyone who can weave an analogy between mangrove forests and enterprises and make it click, it’s Vishal! These are insights that could only come from someone who has built, led and now re-imagines what the enterprise of the future looks like. Watch the full conversation at And of course, a massive thank you to Vishal for making the time for this conversation!
1:23

Every once in a while, you have a conversation that lingers, not just because of what’s spoken, but because of how deeply it reframes your thinking. My recent conversation with Vishal Sikka was exactly that. From leading SAP’s HANA revolution and driving Infosys’ transformation to now reimagining enterprise AI at Vianai Systems, Inc., Vishal has lived at the intersection of technology, philosophy and leadership. We spoke about what “enterprise-grade AI” really means in a world obsessed with speed over reliability, why enterprises are more like mangrove forests than machines (intricate, resilient & capable of withstanding shocks) and how India can shape the future of AI through its unique blend of scale, talent and systems thinking. Besides, if there’s anyone who can weave an analogy between mangrove forests and enterprises and make it click, it’s Vishal! These are insights that could only come from someone who has built, led and now re-imagines what the enterprise of the future looks like. Watch the full conversation at And of course, a massive thank you to Vishal for making the time for this conversation!

Alok Goyal

28,475 views • 11 months ago

Larry Ellison just told every software engineer on Earth their job description is dead. Not evolving. Dead. Ellison: “The code that Oracle is writing, Oracle isn’t writing. Our AI models are writing.” This is not a startup demo. This is one of the largest infrastructure monopolies on the planet telling you it already replaced the people who built it. For fifty years, building software meant translating human intent into machine instructions. Line by line. Bug by bug. Sprint by sprint. That entire layer is gone. Ellison: “We don’t write the procedure. We declare our intent.” That sentence just made the entire engineering labor market flinch. The procedure was the job. The procedure was the paycheck. The procedure was what made a developer valuable. And now the machine does it without being asked twice. Ellison: “We just tell the model what we want the program to do, and then the AI comes up with a step-by-step process to actually do it.” You are no longer paid to build. You are paid to think. And most organizations have no idea how to evaluate that. The companies still hiring armies of developers to grind through codebases are paying salaries the machine already made worthless. Not in years. In seconds. When a company worth hundreds of billions hands the keyboard to the machine and tells you the output is better, the debate is not winding down. The debate is over. The enterprise that wins this decade does not write the best code. It removes the human from the process entirely and runs on intent alone. The programmers who survive are the ones who realize the craft is no longer typing. It is architecture. It is judgment. It is knowing what to build and why. Everything else now belongs to the machine. And the machine does not negotiate severance.
0:31

Larry Ellison just told every software engineer on Earth their job description is dead. Not evolving. Dead. Ellison: “The code that Oracle is writing, Oracle isn’t writing. Our AI models are writing.” This is not a startup demo. This is one of the largest infrastructure monopolies on the planet telling you it already replaced the people who built it. For fifty years, building software meant translating human intent into machine instructions. Line by line. Bug by bug. Sprint by sprint. That entire layer is gone. Ellison: “We don’t write the procedure. We declare our intent.” That sentence just made the entire engineering labor market flinch. The procedure was the job. The procedure was the paycheck. The procedure was what made a developer valuable. And now the machine does it without being asked twice. Ellison: “We just tell the model what we want the program to do, and then the AI comes up with a step-by-step process to actually do it.” You are no longer paid to build. You are paid to think. And most organizations have no idea how to evaluate that. The companies still hiring armies of developers to grind through codebases are paying salaries the machine already made worthless. Not in years. In seconds. When a company worth hundreds of billions hands the keyboard to the machine and tells you the output is better, the debate is not winding down. The debate is over. The enterprise that wins this decade does not write the best code. It removes the human from the process entirely and runs on intent alone. The programmers who survive are the ones who realize the craft is no longer typing. It is architecture. It is judgment. It is knowing what to build and why. Everything else now belongs to the machine. And the machine does not negotiate severance.

Dustin

536,629 views • 6 months ago

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"
0:58

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"

American Optimist

13,182 views • 6 months ago

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”
3:13

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”

Jawwwn

695,900 views • 8 months ago