Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

What does AI actually change for builders: It’s not just speed. It’s ambition. The old question was whether an idea was even possible. Google DeepMind's Logan Kilpatrick says he now catches himself wanting to push the same idea ten steps further. The hard part becomes resetting your own ceiling... show more

Sequoia Capital

790,683 subscribers

13,389 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"Don't let ambition become self-sacrifice” Astronaut NOGUCHI, Soichi 野口聡一（公式） on what space taught him about ambition, limits, and readjusting to life on the ground - which he says was the hardest part. As an overachiever, he says, you push to do more than you can handle. Eventually something gives, be it your health, your relationships, or your daily life. His advice to the next generation: don't let that something be you. #AMNC26 #IdeasOnTheMove

"Don't let ambition become self-sacrifice” Astronaut NOGUCHI, Soichi 野口聡一（公式） on what space taught him about ambition, limits, and readjusting to life on the ground - which he says was the hardest part. As an overachiever, he says, you push to do more than you can handle. Eventually something gives, be it your health, your relationships, or your daily life. His advice to the next generation: don't let that something be you. #AMNC26 #IdeasOnTheMove

World Economic Forum

32,758 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Ben Horowitz: Every founder experiences doubt — even Mark Zuckerberg “Congratulations on betting on yourself,” a16z co-founder Ben Horowitz tells an audience full of founders. “Your job is to make your bet payoff. You believed in yourself enough to do it, and there are going to be many times when you question that bet. But that gets you nothing.” Ben offers the following advice: “You just have to do your thing, keep going, and focus on what you can do. The doubts are going to be there, but ignore the doubts. The worst doubts aren’t the ones people put on you; they’re the ones that you put on yourself. Every entrepreneur has them. I spent a lot of time with Mark Zuckerberg when he was 22 years old, and he had tremendous doubt about whether [Facebook] was going to make it. Everybody has that.” He continues: “It’s not what you feel. It’s what you do. So just focus on what you do. You’re going to feel scared. If your guts aren’t boiling, you’re not even trying at these things. Don’t worry about it.” Video source: a16z speedrun 🧊 (2025)

Ben Horowitz: Every founder experiences doubt — even Mark Zuckerberg “Congratulations on betting on yourself,” a16z co-founder Ben Horowitz tells an audience full of founders. “Your job is to make your bet payoff. You believed in yourself enough to do it, and there are going to be many times when you question that bet. But that gets you nothing.” Ben offers the following advice: “You just have to do your thing, keep going, and focus on what you can do. The doubts are going to be there, but ignore the doubts. The worst doubts aren’t the ones people put on you; they’re the ones that you put on yourself. Every entrepreneur has them. I spent a lot of time with Mark Zuckerberg when he was 22 years old, and he had tremendous doubt about whether [Facebook] was going to make it. Everybody has that.” He continues: “It’s not what you feel. It’s what you do. So just focus on what you do. You’re going to feel scared. If your guts aren’t boiling, you’re not even trying at these things. Don’t worry about it.” Video source: a16z speedrun 🧊 (2025)

Startup Archive

58,796 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

It’s amazing what can fool people when they don’t take the time to think. If you believe this is real, you must first ask yourself one question… How many times have you seen cloud formations stay the same for the entire day? How about even an hour?

It’s amazing what can fool people when they don’t take the time to think. If you believe this is real, you must first ask yourself one question… How many times have you seen cloud formations stay the same for the entire day? How about even an hour?

Ted Logan

259,275 просмотров • 1 год назад

#BREAKING: Psaki: The people who spent months saying you were going to bankrupt NYC are the same people now supporting the ridiculous $1.776 billion fund. What say you? NYC Mayor: “…there is a politics across this country that is completely at peace with the idea of spending billions of dollars to enrich those who already have more money than they know what to do with, and what they are offended by is the idea of spending that money to help those who have been left behind by our politics. It just shows that it’s all a question of priorities, it’s not a question of what’s possible.”🤔

#BREAKING: Psaki: The people who spent months saying you were going to bankrupt NYC are the same people now supporting the ridiculous $1.776 billion fund. What say you? NYC Mayor: “…there is a politics across this country that is completely at peace with the idea of spending billions of dollars to enrich those who already have more money than they know what to do with, and what they are offended by is the idea of spending that money to help those who have been left behind by our politics. It just shows that it’s all a question of priorities, it’s not a question of what’s possible.”🤔

Emoluments Clause

697,093 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

this was 5 months ago. he started with absolutely zero knowledge on how to read the markets couldn't tell you what a fair value gap was. couldn't tell you what liquidity meant. didn't know what a prop firm was his PnL since then is $200k+ started working with me 1-on-1 and learned the same system i use every single day. same session profiling. same gap entries. same rules you'll definitely be seeing more of him in the future with some crazy payouts nothing fancy. just built properly. this is the part most people miss: it’s not an information problem it’s a structure problem you can watch 1000 hours of contentand still not be able to execute when it matters because nothing is actually built around how you trade that’s what I do. not signals not a course I build traders that don’t need me anymore. most of you don’t need more information you need your execution fixed changing the space person by person. that's why i do this fuck the toxic space, I'm here to change lives

this was 5 months ago. he started with absolutely zero knowledge on how to read the markets couldn't tell you what a fair value gap was. couldn't tell you what liquidity meant. didn't know what a prop firm was his PnL since then is $200k+ started working with me 1-on-1 and learned the same system i use every single day. same session profiling. same gap entries. same rules you'll definitely be seeing more of him in the future with some crazy payouts nothing fancy. just built properly. this is the part most people miss: it’s not an information problem it’s a structure problem you can watch 1000 hours of contentand still not be able to execute when it matters because nothing is actually built around how you trade that’s what I do. not signals not a course I build traders that don’t need me anymore. most of you don’t need more information you need your execution fixed changing the space person by person. that's why i do this fuck the toxic space, I'm here to change lives

L2WTrades

28,761 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

how do you question your employee for being late when he was at your own father’s funeral, the man who built the company? and now you’re running things like that’s a problem. the worst part is, people like this actually exist

how do you question your employee for being late when he was at your own father’s funeral, the man who built the company? and now you’re running things like that’s a problem. the worst part is, people like this actually exist

Shegun 🌪️🌟

163,711 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This guy made $8,400 in 13 days from a business that was built entirely by AI. He is not a coder. He doesn't have any special technical skills. He just had an idea and let AI do the rest. 2 weeks in, he's projected to make $100k/year from this "side hustle" If you are even the slightest bit curious about what you can build with AI, watch this!

This guy made $8,400 in 13 days from a business that was built entirely by AI. He is not a coder. He doesn't have any special technical skills. He just had an idea and let AI do the rest. 2 weeks in, he's projected to make $100k/year from this "side hustle" If you are even the slightest bit curious about what you can build with AI, watch this!

Chris Koerner

142,765 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🐧 “what’s the similarity between your current self and your trainee self and what’s the difference?” hyung, i think you can just say how your personality has changed and how it’s stayed the same…if there’s no difference, you can just say that too 🦊 me? something that’s exactly the same? 🦊 i think my ambition is still the same…my ambition towards work and my love for what i do is still the same 🦊 the passion is still burning within me 🐧 i think so too 🐧 you always work hard 🦊 i can’t multitask so you have to keep asking me the question 🐧 of course, i’ll do that 🦊 and what’s changed? 🐧 yes yes yes what’s changed 🦊 in the past, i was an extreme extrovert like an extremeeeeely extroverted person but i feel like there’s a little bit of introversion mixed in there now 🐧 i agree 🦊 (that’s how) i’ve changed

🐧 “what’s the similarity between your current self and your trainee self and what’s the difference?” hyung, i think you can just say how your personality has changed and how it’s stayed the same…if there’s no difference, you can just say that too 🦊 me? something that’s exactly the same? 🦊 i think my ambition is still the same…my ambition towards work and my love for what i do is still the same 🦊 the passion is still burning within me 🐧 i think so too 🐧 you always work hard 🦊 i can’t multitask so you have to keep asking me the question 🐧 of course, i’ll do that 🦊 and what’s changed? 🐧 yes yes yes what’s changed 🦊 in the past, i was an extreme extrovert like an extremeeeeely extroverted person but i feel like there’s a little bit of introversion mixed in there now 🐧 i agree 🦊 (that’s how) i’ve changed

💬

32,887 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book Scary Smart now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Jimmy Carr’s favorite question right now cuts straight through the fear: “What would you do if you couldn’t fail?” He says if you answer that honestly, it becomes your compass. “The biggest addiction in America isn’t opioids… it’s a monthly salary. Getting out from under that and doing something on your own is hard, but fucking give it a go.” 43-second gut-check — Carr daring you to name the dream you’ve buried under “security.” So… what would YOU do if failure wasn’t even on the table? Drop your one honest answer below — no hedging, no “realistic” version. Just the raw dream. (And if the answer scares you… that’s probably the right one.)

Jimmy Carr’s favorite question right now cuts straight through the fear: “What would you do if you couldn’t fail?” He says if you answer that honestly, it becomes your compass. “The biggest addiction in America isn’t opioids… it’s a monthly salary. Getting out from under that and doing something on your own is hard, but fucking give it a go.” 43-second gut-check — Carr daring you to name the dream you’ve buried under “security.” So… what would YOU do if failure wasn’t even on the table? Drop your one honest answer below — no hedging, no “realistic” version. Just the raw dream. (And if the answer scares you… that’s probably the right one.)

Camus

35,412 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🤔 Harriet Harman just went on national television and said this with a straight face: “The only way we’ll have a woman leader of the Labour Party next time is if we start a conversation now where we say that actually, men cannot stand for the leadership next time. What we need to do is for women’s ambition to be encouraged and male ambition to be discouraged.” Let that sink in. A senior Labour figure is openly calling for men to be barred from standing and for male ambition itself to be actively discouraged. Not “encourage more women”. Not “equality”. Straight-up: lock men out and tell boys their ambition is the problem. The best person for the job should get the job, full stop. Anything else is identity politics over competence, and it’s toxic. What message does this send to every young man or boy who works hard and wants to lead? Your ambition is unwelcome. Sit down so we can force a preferred outcome. Just when you think Labour’s gender obsession couldn’t get more extreme, they manage to lower the bar again. Meritocracy or discrimination. You can’t have both.

🤔 Harriet Harman just went on national television and said this with a straight face: “The only way we’ll have a woman leader of the Labour Party next time is if we start a conversation now where we say that actually, men cannot stand for the leadership next time. What we need to do is for women’s ambition to be encouraged and male ambition to be discouraged.” Let that sink in. A senior Labour figure is openly calling for men to be barred from standing and for male ambition itself to be actively discouraged. Not “encourage more women”. Not “equality”. Straight-up: lock men out and tell boys their ambition is the problem. The best person for the job should get the job, full stop. Anything else is identity politics over competence, and it’s toxic. What message does this send to every young man or boy who works hard and wants to lead? Your ambition is unwelcome. Sit down so we can force a preferred outcome. Just when you think Labour’s gender obsession couldn’t get more extreme, they manage to lower the bar again. Meritocracy or discrimination. You can’t have both.

J Stewart

87,813 просмотров • 21 дней назад

#MarkTuan on the dogist 🧔🏻 if milo were in a kpop band, what do you think the name of the band would be? 🐰 it’s gotta do something with like PAWS 🧔🏻 one idea i was thinking is WOOF7 🐰 WOOF7? okay. i was thinking like PAWS7 🧔🏻 you think his fanbase is big, just wait til you see milo 🐰 he has a big fanbase 🧔🏻 he does? 🐰 he does. my cats are famous too

#MarkTuan on the dogist 🧔🏻 if milo were in a kpop band, what do you think the name of the band would be? 🐰 it’s gotta do something with like PAWS 🧔🏻 one idea i was thinking is WOOF7 🐰 WOOF7? okay. i was thinking like PAWS7 🧔🏻 you think his fanbase is big, just wait til you see milo 🐰 he has a big fanbase 🧔🏻 he does? 🐰 he does. my cats are famous too

𝐣𝐨𝐲𝐜𝐞

18,536 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

America in a nutshell: “No man has to bow. No man born to royalty. Here we judge you by what you do, not by who your father was. Here you can be something. Here is the place to build a home…It’s the idea that we all have value — you and me.”

America in a nutshell: “No man has to bow. No man born to royalty. Here we judge you by what you do, not by who your father was. Here you can be something. Here is the place to build a home…It’s the idea that we all have value — you and me.”

Boris Ryvkin

168,128 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

NEW: Bill Maher says Trump was “exactly right” to mock reporter over “stupid question” about the plane crash site. This impression is actually pretty good. “They asked him a question about the crash, and they said, ‘Will you visit the crash site now?’ Every other politician would go, ‘Of course, it was a tragedy.’ “And he went, ‘It’s the water. What do you want me to do, swim there?’ And I was like, exactly. F*ck right. You’re exactly right. It’s a stupid question. And you got just the answer you deserve.”

NEW: Bill Maher says Trump was “exactly right” to mock reporter over “stupid question” about the plane crash site. This impression is actually pretty good. “They asked him a question about the crash, and they said, ‘Will you visit the crash site now?’ Every other politician would go, ‘Of course, it was a tragedy.’ “And he went, ‘It’s the water. What do you want me to do, swim there?’ And I was like, exactly. F*ck right. You’re exactly right. It’s a stupid question. And you got just the answer you deserve.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,460,249 просмотров • 1 год назад

When we first announced our Moral Ambition Fellowship at Harvard, some people pushed back: ‘Why focus on privileged kids? Aren’t they just future sell-outs?’ I get the question. But what we’ve found is the opposite. Most students genuinely want to do good, they’re just funneled into BS-jobs by companies with marketing and recruiting budgets the size of small nations. When you’re 20 and unsure what to do with your life, the path of least resistance is hard to resist. That’s why we’re here at The School for Moral Ambition: to give them a different idea of what success can look like. Making billionaires pay their fair share in taxes. Preventing the next pandemic. Tackling climate change. Doing something actually worth remembering, instead of spending a lifetime filling spreadsheets to make rich shareholders even richer. A new generation is hungry for moral ambition. We just need to open the door.

When we first announced our Moral Ambition Fellowship at Harvard, some people pushed back: ‘Why focus on privileged kids? Aren’t they just future sell-outs?’ I get the question. But what we’ve found is the opposite. Most students genuinely want to do good, they’re just funneled into BS-jobs by companies with marketing and recruiting budgets the size of small nations. When you’re 20 and unsure what to do with your life, the path of least resistance is hard to resist. That’s why we’re here at The School for Moral Ambition: to give them a different idea of what success can look like. Making billionaires pay their fair share in taxes. Preventing the next pandemic. Tackling climate change. Doing something actually worth remembering, instead of spending a lifetime filling spreadsheets to make rich shareholders even richer. A new generation is hungry for moral ambition. We just need to open the door.

Rutger Bregman

18,380 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Ray Kurzweil dropped a mind-bending clarification on the timeline we’ve all been watching. He still stands by his famous 2029 prediction for human-level AI. But the Singularity — the point where we become a thousand times smarter — comes in 2045. The key difference? We won’t just have AI beside us. We’re going to merge with it. Kurzweil says the boundary will disappear: you won’t know whether an idea popped into your head from your biological brain or your computational intelligence. It will feel exactly the same. Today we can tell when something comes from an LLM. In the future, we won’t. By 2045, he believes this merger will multiply our intelligence by a factor of 1,000. It’s not two separate things competing. It’s one seamless intelligence — and we become it. What do you think — does the idea of fully merging with AI excite you, scare you, or both?

Ray Kurzweil dropped a mind-bending clarification on the timeline we’ve all been watching. He still stands by his famous 2029 prediction for human-level AI. But the Singularity — the point where we become a thousand times smarter — comes in 2045. The key difference? We won’t just have AI beside us. We’re going to merge with it. Kurzweil says the boundary will disappear: you won’t know whether an idea popped into your head from your biological brain or your computational intelligence. It will feel exactly the same. Today we can tell when something comes from an LLM. In the future, we won’t. By 2045, he believes this merger will multiply our intelligence by a factor of 1,000. It’s not two separate things competing. It’s one seamless intelligence — and we become it. What do you think — does the idea of fully merging with AI excite you, scare you, or both?

Camus

63,455 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Professor Jiang just said something I was NOT expecting... He thinks the entire purpose of AI is to build God. In his own words (not mine): "AI only works if it becomes God." This 30-second clip will completely change your mind on everything being built right now:

Professor Jiang just said something I was NOT expecting... He thinks the entire purpose of AI is to build God. In his own words (not mine): "AI only works if it becomes God." This 30-second clip will completely change your mind on everything being built right now:

Miles Deutscher

33,820 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Dustin

787,335 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

“what was once just your imagination” hits different when you stan them from the start, not knowing it’s possible for them to have a series together, and just rely on your imagination/ what ifs to write about it. They’re easily of the best thing ever happened to me.

“what was once just your imagination” hits different when you stan them from the start, not knowing it’s possible for them to have a series together, and just rely on your imagination/ what ifs to write about it. They’re easily of the best thing ever happened to me.

Ra🧃

12,895 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад