正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

What does 'net migration' actually mean in Great Britain?🇬🇧 While Brits & Europeans left, the Third World arrived & stayed‼️ Net migration in 2024 alone saw: 21,000 FEWER Brits 95,000 FEWER Europeans Yet... 240,000 MORE Indians 120,000 MORE Nigerians 101,000 MORE Pakistanis

Lucy White

54,652 subscribers

52,698 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨🇬🇧 Holy Shit - This is insane if Lucy White figures are even slightly accurate for 2024 migration demographics in the Britain 240,000 more Indians 120,000 more Nigerians 101,000 more Pakistanis This is the equivalent of to a New City being established which would be near Top 5 in terms of population - in just ONE YEAR. The UK is completely cooked.

🚨🇬🇧 Holy Shit - This is insane if Lucy White figures are even slightly accurate for 2024 migration demographics in the Britain 240,000 more Indians 120,000 more Nigerians 101,000 more Pakistanis This is the equivalent of to a New City being established which would be near Top 5 in terms of population - in just ONE YEAR. The UK is completely cooked.

Concerned Citizen

15,409 次观看 • 4 个月前

Solange Mougin, "The majority of Brits are not too happy about Brexit" "30% of Brits say it was right to leave, that's the lowest it has ever been" "The overall feeling among Brits is that Brexit is a bad move" "The UK has lost over £100 billion a year" "64% of Brits want a stronger relationship with the EU" "55% of Brits want to rejoin the EU" "42,000 Brits moved to the EU in 2023" "Spain was the number one destination, followed by France" "Things have become more difficult for Brits with second homes" "Since Brexit there has been negative net migration, more Europeans are leaving than going to the UK" "While tourism is increasing around Europe since covid, it hasn't been doing as well in the UK.. There's a £2.8 billion shortfall" "Why is the EU outperforming the UK and attracting tourists?" "Why are Brits still traveling to Europe but fewer Europeans are traveling to the UK?" "The expense.. The cost of food, transport have got higher" "Then bureaucracy.. Many Europeans do not have passports.. Since ID cards no longer work to get into the UK, people chose to stay in the Schengen zone" "Many tourists no longer feel welcome in the UK since Brexit"

Solange Mougin, "The majority of Brits are not too happy about Brexit" "30% of Brits say it was right to leave, that's the lowest it has ever been" "The overall feeling among Brits is that Brexit is a bad move" "The UK has lost over £100 billion a year" "64% of Brits want a stronger relationship with the EU" "55% of Brits want to rejoin the EU" "42,000 Brits moved to the EU in 2023" "Spain was the number one destination, followed by France" "Things have become more difficult for Brits with second homes" "Since Brexit there has been negative net migration, more Europeans are leaving than going to the UK" "While tourism is increasing around Europe since covid, it hasn't been doing as well in the UK.. There's a £2.8 billion shortfall" "Why is the EU outperforming the UK and attracting tourists?" "Why are Brits still traveling to Europe but fewer Europeans are traveling to the UK?" "The expense.. The cost of food, transport have got higher" "Then bureaucracy.. Many Europeans do not have passports.. Since ID cards no longer work to get into the UK, people chose to stay in the Schengen zone" "Many tourists no longer feel welcome in the UK since Brexit"

Farrukh

33,984 次观看 • 1 年前

Keir Starmer is celebrating an 84 percent fall in net migration. But it's a hollow victory. Total migration was 813,000. 77 percent (627,000) were from outside Europe. Half of work visas were given to dependents. More than 88,000 were asylum seekers, including illegal migrants. Net migration only fell to 171,000 because 246,000 British citizens left the country, including thousands of young native Brits. ONS estimates show that at least 19 percent of the UK population was born overseas. Gross immigration between 2021 - 2025 was 5.6 million. 1 in 20 residents in Britain arrived in the last five years. First- or second-generation immigrants now make up a quarter of the population. And record numbers were granted citizenship in 2025. We can't keep doing this. The public don't want to. 41 percent of voters told Ipsos that immigration is the biggest issue in Britain. We can't build three new Birminghams to accommodate these people. We shouldn't have to. This must be reversed.

Keir Starmer is celebrating an 84 percent fall in net migration. But it's a hollow victory. Total migration was 813,000. 77 percent (627,000) were from outside Europe. Half of work visas were given to dependents. More than 88,000 were asylum seekers, including illegal migrants. Net migration only fell to 171,000 because 246,000 British citizens left the country, including thousands of young native Brits. ONS estimates show that at least 19 percent of the UK population was born overseas. Gross immigration between 2021 - 2025 was 5.6 million. 1 in 20 residents in Britain arrived in the last five years. First- or second-generation immigrants now make up a quarter of the population. And record numbers were granted citizenship in 2025. We can't keep doing this. The public don't want to. 41 percent of voters told Ipsos that immigration is the biggest issue in Britain. We can't build three new Birminghams to accommodate these people. We shouldn't have to. This must be reversed.

Connor Tomlinson

15,001 次观看 • 2 个月前

🔥 Minnesota's "brain drain" just got a price tag – and it's steeper than a Lake Superior bluff! 🧠💸 Quick facts (verified 100% accurate from official data): 👂Net Migration Loss: Nearly 48,000 more folks left MN than arrived (2020-2024), ranking us 41st nationally. 👂The Income Sting: High earners ($100k+) bolted, draining $2.19 BILLION in adjusted gross income (AGI) from 2021-2022 alone. Fewer fat wallets = slimmer state budgets for potholes & plows. 👂Growth Reality: MN's pop "boost" is 94% fueled by immigrants (2020-2024) – a vital band-aid amid domestic dips. Why the double whammy? Blame taxes, sky-high housing, job shifts & those "warmer state" dreams – per migration reports. Sources: Census Bureau, IRS SOI Migration Data, Alpha News, American Experiment, MN Chamber of Commerce.

🔥 Minnesota's "brain drain" just got a price tag – and it's steeper than a Lake Superior bluff! 🧠💸 Quick facts (verified 100% accurate from official data): 👂Net Migration Loss: Nearly 48,000 more folks left MN than arrived (2020-2024), ranking us 41st nationally. 👂The Income Sting: High earners ($100k+) bolted, draining $2.19 BILLION in adjusted gross income (AGI) from 2021-2022 alone. Fewer fat wallets = slimmer state budgets for potholes & plows. 👂Growth Reality: MN's pop "boost" is 94% fueled by immigrants (2020-2024) – a vital band-aid amid domestic dips. Why the double whammy? Blame taxes, sky-high housing, job shifts & those "warmer state" dreams – per migration reports. Sources: Census Bureau, IRS SOI Migration Data, Alpha News, American Experiment, MN Chamber of Commerce.

Garage Logic

11,218 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇬🇧 BRITAIN'S BRAIN DRAIN: WHEN YOUR OWN CITIZENS FLEE Britain just set a record nobody wanted: 257,000 UK citizens packed up and left last year. That's triple what officials predicted, and honestly, can you blame them? 116,000 more Brits emigrated than came home. They're fleeing to Dubai, Milan, anywhere the tax man isn't quite so greedy. Turns out when you tax people into oblivion, they actually leave. Who knew? But there's more dysfunction: EU migration crashed below 100,000 for the first time in 2 decades (mostly due to Brexit red tape), while non-EU migration exploded to over 1 million before plummeting back down. Britain somehow managed to drive out both its own citizens and the Europeans while creating a chaotic revolving door for everyone else. The government's message is clear: we'll tax you to death, strangle you with bureaucracy, and wonder why you're booking one-way tickets. It's a full-scale exodus of people who've decided Britain isn't worth the hassle anymore. When your own citizens are voting with their feet faster than at any point in modern history, maybe it's time to ask what you're doing wrong. Source: Daily Mail

🇬🇧 BRITAIN'S BRAIN DRAIN: WHEN YOUR OWN CITIZENS FLEE Britain just set a record nobody wanted: 257,000 UK citizens packed up and left last year. That's triple what officials predicted, and honestly, can you blame them? 116,000 more Brits emigrated than came home. They're fleeing to Dubai, Milan, anywhere the tax man isn't quite so greedy. Turns out when you tax people into oblivion, they actually leave. Who knew? But there's more dysfunction: EU migration crashed below 100,000 for the first time in 2 decades (mostly due to Brexit red tape), while non-EU migration exploded to over 1 million before plummeting back down. Britain somehow managed to drive out both its own citizens and the Europeans while creating a chaotic revolving door for everyone else. The government's message is clear: we'll tax you to death, strangle you with bureaucracy, and wonder why you're booking one-way tickets. It's a full-scale exodus of people who've decided Britain isn't worth the hassle anymore. When your own citizens are voting with their feet faster than at any point in modern history, maybe it's time to ask what you're doing wrong. Source: Daily Mail

Mario Nawfal

116,946 次观看 • 7 个月前

Aussies sleeping in cars and tents while Labor floods our nation. Housing costs EXPLODING, services overwhelmed. Labor has LOST CONTROL of our borders. Chief Economist, IPA - Adam Creighton 👉 The Prime Minister did say earlier this year that the rate of immigration would fall to 260,000 net overseas migration. Well, we're on track at the current rate for this calendar year of 590,000. And the figure for the financial year that just ended was supposed to be 335,000 net overseas migration. We don't even have the figures yet for June, but it's already 27% out of 90,000 more than than the forecast of 335. So I mean it really is out of control. Taken from a post by Institute of Public Affairs Institute of Public Affairs on X.

Aussies sleeping in cars and tents while Labor floods our nation. Housing costs EXPLODING, services overwhelmed. Labor has LOST CONTROL of our borders. Chief Economist, IPA - Adam Creighton 👉 The Prime Minister did say earlier this year that the rate of immigration would fall to 260,000 net overseas migration. Well, we're on track at the current rate for this calendar year of 590,000. And the figure for the financial year that just ended was supposed to be 335,000 net overseas migration. We don't even have the figures yet for June, but it's already 27% out of 90,000 more than than the forecast of 335. So I mean it really is out of control. Taken from a post by Institute of Public Affairs Institute of Public Affairs on X.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

31,463 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨🇬🇧 BRITAIN'S MIGRATION MATH JUST FLIPPED: ASYLUM SEEKERS NOW DRIVE THE NUMBERS Britain's net migration plummeted to 204,000 while asylum claims hit 110,000, a record that reveals everything about modern immigration's transformation. Asylum seekers now constitute 44% of net migration, double their pre-Brexit share. This isn't just statistical noise; it's complete demographic inversion where refugees replace workers, dependence replaces contribution. The economic implications are brutal. Skilled worker visas collapsed while asylum claims exploded. Workers who pay taxes and fill critical roles are leaving. People requiring immediate support, housing, and benefits are arriving. The math just ain't mathing. Here's what's actually happening. Foreign workers who came during Britain's post-Brexit labor shortage are going home, their visas expired, opportunities exhausted. Meanwhile, 40,000 asylum seekers arrived by small boats this year alone, each costing taxpayers £65,000 annually in hotels, processing, and support. That's £2.6 billion for boat arrivals alone, not counting the 70,000 who claimed asylum through other routes. The transformation accelerated under deliberate policy. Safe routes expanded, processing slowed, removals essentially stopped. Britain went from importing engineers and nurses to warehousing asylum seekers in hotels across every constituency. Communities that needed skilled workers got dependents instead. This isn't sustainable mathematics. When nearly half your immigration requires full public support while your economy needs contributors, you're managing decline, not growth. Britain's choosing humanitarian theater over economic reality. Source: DailyMail

🚨🇬🇧 BRITAIN'S MIGRATION MATH JUST FLIPPED: ASYLUM SEEKERS NOW DRIVE THE NUMBERS Britain's net migration plummeted to 204,000 while asylum claims hit 110,000, a record that reveals everything about modern immigration's transformation. Asylum seekers now constitute 44% of net migration, double their pre-Brexit share. This isn't just statistical noise; it's complete demographic inversion where refugees replace workers, dependence replaces contribution. The economic implications are brutal. Skilled worker visas collapsed while asylum claims exploded. Workers who pay taxes and fill critical roles are leaving. People requiring immediate support, housing, and benefits are arriving. The math just ain't mathing. Here's what's actually happening. Foreign workers who came during Britain's post-Brexit labor shortage are going home, their visas expired, opportunities exhausted. Meanwhile, 40,000 asylum seekers arrived by small boats this year alone, each costing taxpayers £65,000 annually in hotels, processing, and support. That's £2.6 billion for boat arrivals alone, not counting the 70,000 who claimed asylum through other routes. The transformation accelerated under deliberate policy. Safe routes expanded, processing slowed, removals essentially stopped. Britain went from importing engineers and nurses to warehousing asylum seekers in hotels across every constituency. Communities that needed skilled workers got dependents instead. This isn't sustainable mathematics. When nearly half your immigration requires full public support while your economy needs contributors, you're managing decline, not growth. Britain's choosing humanitarian theater over economic reality. Source: DailyMail

Mario Nawfal

273,900 次观看 • 8 个月前

Brits and Europeans visiting America for the World Cup have discovered air conditioning and are asking why we don't have it this side of the Atlantic. Unfortunately, our stringent net zero policies mean air conditioning is illegal in a lot of places. One place air conditioning is allowed is in the offices of top European Union bureaucrats who decide the rules, banning it for other people - even their underlings on the floors below them. Compare this to China, where even pigs can have air conditioning. It's almost as if the oppressive communist regime with corrupt, self-serving leaders is Europe. The thing is, air conditioning could support net zero. Air conditioners run when it's very hot, and it's very hot when the sun is shining, and when the sun is shining, all the solar panels Ed Miliband forced us to install make lots of power. Too much power, in fact. There's an increasingly common phenomenon where the grid gets overloaded by electricity produced by renewables, and then electricity has to be given a negative price (paying people to use it) to encourage people to use it to syphon off this extra power so it doesn't damage the grid. Meanwhile, the usual uninformed lefty windbags appear on the BBC to spout off nonsense about evil Britain using lots of air-conditioning while countries such as India and Nigeria don't use it at all. This is nonsense. 20% of Nigerians and 10% of Indians have air conditioning in their homes, compared to only 3-4% in Britain. It's almost as if Net Zero isn't about efficient energy use at all, but it's just about making us suffer.

Brits and Europeans visiting America for the World Cup have discovered air conditioning and are asking why we don't have it this side of the Atlantic. Unfortunately, our stringent net zero policies mean air conditioning is illegal in a lot of places. One place air conditioning is allowed is in the offices of top European Union bureaucrats who decide the rules, banning it for other people - even their underlings on the floors below them. Compare this to China, where even pigs can have air conditioning. It's almost as if the oppressive communist regime with corrupt, self-serving leaders is Europe. The thing is, air conditioning could support net zero. Air conditioners run when it's very hot, and it's very hot when the sun is shining, and when the sun is shining, all the solar panels Ed Miliband forced us to install make lots of power. Too much power, in fact. There's an increasingly common phenomenon where the grid gets overloaded by electricity produced by renewables, and then electricity has to be given a negative price (paying people to use it) to encourage people to use it to syphon off this extra power so it doesn't damage the grid. Meanwhile, the usual uninformed lefty windbags appear on the BBC to spout off nonsense about evil Britain using lots of air-conditioning while countries such as India and Nigeria don't use it at all. This is nonsense. 20% of Nigerians and 10% of Indians have air conditioning in their homes, compared to only 3-4% in Britain. It's almost as if Net Zero isn't about efficient energy use at all, but it's just about making us suffer.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

17,636 次观看 • 29 天前

Victoria Atkins's car crash interview on migration Victoria Derbyshire, "Net migration has been even higher than had been previously reported" "906,000 for the year to June 2023 With 1.3 million coming to the UK And 443,000 people leaving" "728,000 for the year ending June 2024" "The Conservatives were in government during that period" "In the 2019, you pledged to get net migration down, it was in your manifesto.. It increased by 700,000 people.. What was your reaction when you heard that number?" Victoria Atkins, "We wanted immigration to come down and it didn't.. We want to do better for voters" Victoria Derbyshire, "So when you heard it was nearly a million in 2023, what did you think?" Victoria Atkins, "Like you being fair minded, I imagine you and others understand three humanitarian crisis.. Ukraine, Afghanistan, Hong Kong" Victoria Derbyshire, "Just on that point, humanitarian visas in 2023 made up 7% of the 1.44 million legal visas you handed out.. So it's a tiny proportion" Victoria Atkins, "But a significant one" Victoria Derbyshire, "When you heard it 1 million people on your watch, what did you think?" Victoria Atkins, "It's too high.. That's why Rishi Sunak made decision t o stop international students bringing dependants" Victoria Derbyshire, "You had to bring in reforms to reverse the numbers that came in because of your earlier reforms" Victoria Atkins, "This is a popular country due to our universities.. There was an issue with dependents.. We have to look forward... Labour don't have any firm plans for change" Victoria Derbyshire, "We haven't heard their speech yet" Victoria Atkins, "We've had pre briefs haven't we.. Labour are opening more hotels across the country.. Focusing on the process.. But not the deterrents" Victoria Derbyshire, "Since 2010 the Conservatives promised to bring down net migration.. David Cameron.. Theresa May.. 2010, 2015, 2017, 2019.. You promised voters you'll bring it down, and every single time you've actually delivered the opposite.. So I wonder why any voter should ever believe anything the Conservatives say on net migration ever again" Victoria Atkins, "We took an enormous loss in July.. We're trying to understand what voters are saying to saying to us.. We also know the economy is a huge issue in the cost of living crisis.. Farm tax across the UK" Victoria Derbyshire, "May I bring you back to legal migration.. Kemi Badenoch said she would bring a strict numerical cap, what does that mean?" Victoria Atkins, "We are at the beginning of this conversation" Victoria Derbyshire, "What is the strict numerical plan?" Victoria Atkins, "You would not expect us to have operational details on this at this stage" Victoria Derbyshire, "Ball park figure? I'm asking you because your new leader promised a strict numerical cap without a figure, so in a sense its meaningless without a figure" Victoria Atkins, "We've got quite a bit of time before the next election.. We're going to hold the government in account.. Farming tax"

Victoria Atkins's car crash interview on migration Victoria Derbyshire, "Net migration has been even higher than had been previously reported" "906,000 for the year to June 2023 With 1.3 million coming to the UK And 443,000 people leaving" "728,000 for the year ending June 2024" "The Conservatives were in government during that period" "In the 2019, you pledged to get net migration down, it was in your manifesto.. It increased by 700,000 people.. What was your reaction when you heard that number?" Victoria Atkins, "We wanted immigration to come down and it didn't.. We want to do better for voters" Victoria Derbyshire, "So when you heard it was nearly a million in 2023, what did you think?" Victoria Atkins, "Like you being fair minded, I imagine you and others understand three humanitarian crisis.. Ukraine, Afghanistan, Hong Kong" Victoria Derbyshire, "Just on that point, humanitarian visas in 2023 made up 7% of the 1.44 million legal visas you handed out.. So it's a tiny proportion" Victoria Atkins, "But a significant one" Victoria Derbyshire, "When you heard it 1 million people on your watch, what did you think?" Victoria Atkins, "It's too high.. That's why Rishi Sunak made decision t o stop international students bringing dependants" Victoria Derbyshire, "You had to bring in reforms to reverse the numbers that came in because of your earlier reforms" Victoria Atkins, "This is a popular country due to our universities.. There was an issue with dependents.. We have to look forward... Labour don't have any firm plans for change" Victoria Derbyshire, "We haven't heard their speech yet" Victoria Atkins, "We've had pre briefs haven't we.. Labour are opening more hotels across the country.. Focusing on the process.. But not the deterrents" Victoria Derbyshire, "Since 2010 the Conservatives promised to bring down net migration.. David Cameron.. Theresa May.. 2010, 2015, 2017, 2019.. You promised voters you'll bring it down, and every single time you've actually delivered the opposite.. So I wonder why any voter should ever believe anything the Conservatives say on net migration ever again" Victoria Atkins, "We took an enormous loss in July.. We're trying to understand what voters are saying to saying to us.. We also know the economy is a huge issue in the cost of living crisis.. Farm tax across the UK" Victoria Derbyshire, "May I bring you back to legal migration.. Kemi Badenoch said she would bring a strict numerical cap, what does that mean?" Victoria Atkins, "We are at the beginning of this conversation" Victoria Derbyshire, "What is the strict numerical plan?" Victoria Atkins, "You would not expect us to have operational details on this at this stage" Victoria Derbyshire, "Ball park figure? I'm asking you because your new leader promised a strict numerical cap without a figure, so in a sense its meaningless without a figure" Victoria Atkins, "We've got quite a bit of time before the next election.. We're going to hold the government in account.. Farming tax"

Farrukh

386,821 次观看 • 1 年前

Why are there so many Pakistanis in Britain? Why do so many come from the same tiny region in Kashmir? And why are there about to be a lot more? In this video, I trace the roots of Britain's Pakistani population back to a 1960s dam project in Pakistan and a postwar labour shortage in the UK. What began as economic migration soon became chain migration, creating tight-knit (to the point of cousin-banging) communities in places like Bradford and Birmingham, many of which retained the tribal, patriarchal values of their homeland. These imported values - clan loyalty, honour-based social codes, and disdain for outsiders - played a key role in the the grooming gang scandals that have devastated working-class British towns. I also look at the latest political madness: a campaign by Labour MPs to build an airport in Mirpur to make it even easier for these men to come to Britain. That’s right: while British cities collapse under rubbish, rats, and failing services, MPs are lobbying for infrastructure in Pakistan to continue the cycle of chain immigration that’s helped create parallel societies in Britain. This isn’t just about demographics or development - it’s about culture, values, and the deliberate erosion of Western civilisation. The left isn’t blind to the consequences of importing tribal, misogynistic honour cultures into liberal democracies. They welcome it. Why? Because they hate the West: its meritocracy, its freedoms, its traditions. They want to replace it with communism. Anything that weakens the social fabric or destabilises British identity is a step toward their utopian fantasy of a post-national, post-capitalist world. That’s why they champion mass migration, tolerate grooming gangs, and even flirt with blasphemy laws - because in their warped worldview, the enemy is Britain itself.

Why are there so many Pakistanis in Britain? Why do so many come from the same tiny region in Kashmir? And why are there about to be a lot more? In this video, I trace the roots of Britain's Pakistani population back to a 1960s dam project in Pakistan and a postwar labour shortage in the UK. What began as economic migration soon became chain migration, creating tight-knit (to the point of cousin-banging) communities in places like Bradford and Birmingham, many of which retained the tribal, patriarchal values of their homeland. These imported values - clan loyalty, honour-based social codes, and disdain for outsiders - played a key role in the the grooming gang scandals that have devastated working-class British towns. I also look at the latest political madness: a campaign by Labour MPs to build an airport in Mirpur to make it even easier for these men to come to Britain. That’s right: while British cities collapse under rubbish, rats, and failing services, MPs are lobbying for infrastructure in Pakistan to continue the cycle of chain immigration that’s helped create parallel societies in Britain. This isn’t just about demographics or development - it’s about culture, values, and the deliberate erosion of Western civilisation. The left isn’t blind to the consequences of importing tribal, misogynistic honour cultures into liberal democracies. They welcome it. Why? Because they hate the West: its meritocracy, its freedoms, its traditions. They want to replace it with communism. Anything that weakens the social fabric or destabilises British identity is a step toward their utopian fantasy of a post-national, post-capitalist world. That’s why they champion mass migration, tolerate grooming gangs, and even flirt with blasphemy laws - because in their warped worldview, the enemy is Britain itself.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

42,269 次观看 • 1 个月前

Internationalist Soviet Islamic State (ISIS) A short documentary on Russia's anti-White, pro-Islamic policies of ethnic replacement. While the author miscalculates their loss of communist doctrine, he details how Moscow holds the invasion of Europe as their highest destiny. "The old Soviet ideas are not only in place, but were enhanced and made even more toxic" It truly is the White (and remnant Christian) Western world vs the third world led by Moscow and Beijing. 1:25 Stalin and USSR 3:42 After 1991 5:30 After Putin came to power; transformation of Russia into Muslim-Asian country [evidenced by replacement migration in conquered Ukrainian cities] 6:50 Russia's new identity is hatred of Europe and Europeans 8:45 Stalinist Soviet Identity coupled with militant Islamism is the new identity 9:30 Chechens 10:41 ISIS 13:15 American & European 'nationalists' (Keith Woods/Fuentes/etc)

Internationalist Soviet Islamic State (ISIS) A short documentary on Russia's anti-White, pro-Islamic policies of ethnic replacement. While the author miscalculates their loss of communist doctrine, he details how Moscow holds the invasion of Europe as their highest destiny. "The old Soviet ideas are not only in place, but were enhanced and made even more toxic" It truly is the White (and remnant Christian) Western world vs the third world led by Moscow and Beijing. 1:25 Stalin and USSR 3:42 After 1991 5:30 After Putin came to power; transformation of Russia into Muslim-Asian country [evidenced by replacement migration in conquered Ukrainian cities] 6:50 Russia's new identity is hatred of Europe and Europeans 8:45 Stalinist Soviet Identity coupled with militant Islamism is the new identity 9:30 Chechens 10:41 ISIS 13:15 American & European 'nationalists' (Keith Woods/Fuentes/etc)

onetallorder

10,743 次观看 • 1 年前

New episode! Learned a lot chatting with Martin Parkinson about the economics of migration policy. The issue that most people haven't properly understood: Australia has built an economy that requires roughly 2 million more workers than our population of citizens and permanent residents can supply. We've drifted into a guest-worker system that no government ever proposed. Is it possible to have an ethical temporary program for unskilled workers where there is no path to permanency? And what does that look like? We also discuss: - International student fees now fund close to 50% of the cost of all university research in Australia, which means a cap on student numbers trades off with research, R&D, and ultimately productivity. (Australian R&D spending already sits at 1.7% of GDP versus an OECD average of 2.7%.) - Australia has 250,000 skilled migrants -- including 50,000 engineers, 20,000 teachers, 16,000 nurses, and 1,300 electricians -- who were admitted because their qualifications were assessed as commensurate with Australian standards, but who cannot work in their fields because of state-government and professional-body licensing barriers. - The Australian skilled-occupation list is based on a 2001 taxonomy, which is why employers trying to bring in a global procurement manager were forced to map the role to "supermarket manager." - The Australian points test is "dumb": being 40 years and 1 month old gets you dramatically fewer points than being 39 years and 11 months -- Canada's system steps down gradually, ours falls off a cliff. - Indonesia's diaspora in Australia is 90,000 people -- the same size as Fiji's, and roughly 0.03% of Indonesia's population -- despite Indonesia being projected to become the world's fourth-largest economy by 2045. - And much more. Watch below - or on YouTube, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Timestamps: (0:00:00) – Introduction. (0:02:37) – What surprised Parkinson about Australia's immigration system? (0:10:20) – How does migration affect Australians' living standards? (0:16:56) – The political equilibrium (0:19:23) – What are the objectives of the migration program? (0:24:01) – The drift into a guest-worker system (0:41:40) – How leveraged are universities to international students? (0:47:56) – Should we have an official low-skilled migration program? (0:51:32) – Using migration to slow population ageing (0:58:42) – What "skills shortage" actually means (1:08:17) – Problems with the points test (1:14:52) – Our Soviet-style occupation list (1:24:45) – We need to better utilise our skilled migrants (1:34:39) – What is the biggest problem with Australia's migration system? (1:42:01) – How can we attract true global talent? (1:45:58) – Is the migration system robust to AI disruption? (1:53:38) – What should the upper/lower bound for net migration be? (1:56:43) – The Indonesian question (2:06:53) – How much more strategic weight would a bigger population buy us?

New episode! Learned a lot chatting with Martin Parkinson about the economics of migration policy. The issue that most people haven't properly understood: Australia has built an economy that requires roughly 2 million more workers than our population of citizens and permanent residents can supply. We've drifted into a guest-worker system that no government ever proposed. Is it possible to have an ethical temporary program for unskilled workers where there is no path to permanency? And what does that look like? We also discuss: - International student fees now fund close to 50% of the cost of all university research in Australia, which means a cap on student numbers trades off with research, R&D, and ultimately productivity. (Australian R&D spending already sits at 1.7% of GDP versus an OECD average of 2.7%.) - Australia has 250,000 skilled migrants -- including 50,000 engineers, 20,000 teachers, 16,000 nurses, and 1,300 electricians -- who were admitted because their qualifications were assessed as commensurate with Australian standards, but who cannot work in their fields because of state-government and professional-body licensing barriers. - The Australian skilled-occupation list is based on a 2001 taxonomy, which is why employers trying to bring in a global procurement manager were forced to map the role to "supermarket manager." - The Australian points test is "dumb": being 40 years and 1 month old gets you dramatically fewer points than being 39 years and 11 months -- Canada's system steps down gradually, ours falls off a cliff. - Indonesia's diaspora in Australia is 90,000 people -- the same size as Fiji's, and roughly 0.03% of Indonesia's population -- despite Indonesia being projected to become the world's fourth-largest economy by 2045. - And much more. Watch below - or on YouTube, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Timestamps: (0:00:00) – Introduction. (0:02:37) – What surprised Parkinson about Australia's immigration system? (0:10:20) – How does migration affect Australians' living standards? (0:16:56) – The political equilibrium (0:19:23) – What are the objectives of the migration program? (0:24:01) – The drift into a guest-worker system (0:41:40) – How leveraged are universities to international students? (0:47:56) – Should we have an official low-skilled migration program? (0:51:32) – Using migration to slow population ageing (0:58:42) – What "skills shortage" actually means (1:08:17) – Problems with the points test (1:14:52) – Our Soviet-style occupation list (1:24:45) – We need to better utilise our skilled migrants (1:34:39) – What is the biggest problem with Australia's migration system? (1:42:01) – How can we attract true global talent? (1:45:58) – Is the migration system robust to AI disruption? (1:53:38) – What should the upper/lower bound for net migration be? (1:56:43) – The Indonesian question (2:06:53) – How much more strategic weight would a bigger population buy us?

Joseph Noel Walker

170,257 次观看 • 2 个月前

Australia was once the richest country per capita in the world. Today, we have the worst poverty I’ve seen in my lifetime—yet we still have abundant resources, farmland, and energy. Successive Liberal and Labor governments have shut down industries that provided breadwinner jobs, strangled farmers with green tape and UN blue tape, and sold out our wealth. Our GDP is growing, yet Australians are getting poorer. Wealth is being transferred to foreign billionaires and their investment funds—BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street—who now control our banks, retailers, telcos, and energy companies. Prices go up, markets are rigged, and everyday Australians are pushed into poverty while executives take multimillion-dollar salaries for compliance. Housing is worse than ever. Rents in Sydney have surged 40% since 2021, and Melbourne and Brisbane aren’t far behind. Over half of low-income renters spend more than 30% of their income on housing. Meanwhile, the government floods the country with mass migration, driving up demand and destroying quality of life. They paper over the cracks with debt, money printing, and more public servants, which only makes things worse. One Nation warned this would happen. Net zero, mass migration, and bureaucratic strangulation are killing our standard of living—and now one in seven Australians lives below the poverty line, including one in six children. One Nation has solutions: 👉 abolish net zero policies and subsidies 👉 end mass migration 👉 ban foreign ownership 👉 cut red, green, and blue tape 👉 restore breadwinner jobs 👉 protect our farmers 👉 make housing affordable again These problems are man-made, and they can be solved. One Nation is right—and we’re fighting for Australians, not foreign billionaires or globalist agendas.

Australia was once the richest country per capita in the world. Today, we have the worst poverty I’ve seen in my lifetime—yet we still have abundant resources, farmland, and energy. Successive Liberal and Labor governments have shut down industries that provided breadwinner jobs, strangled farmers with green tape and UN blue tape, and sold out our wealth. Our GDP is growing, yet Australians are getting poorer. Wealth is being transferred to foreign billionaires and their investment funds—BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street—who now control our banks, retailers, telcos, and energy companies. Prices go up, markets are rigged, and everyday Australians are pushed into poverty while executives take multimillion-dollar salaries for compliance. Housing is worse than ever. Rents in Sydney have surged 40% since 2021, and Melbourne and Brisbane aren’t far behind. Over half of low-income renters spend more than 30% of their income on housing. Meanwhile, the government floods the country with mass migration, driving up demand and destroying quality of life. They paper over the cracks with debt, money printing, and more public servants, which only makes things worse. One Nation warned this would happen. Net zero, mass migration, and bureaucratic strangulation are killing our standard of living—and now one in seven Australians lives below the poverty line, including one in six children. One Nation has solutions: 👉 abolish net zero policies and subsidies 👉 end mass migration 👉 ban foreign ownership 👉 cut red, green, and blue tape 👉 restore breadwinner jobs 👉 protect our farmers 👉 make housing affordable again These problems are man-made, and they can be solved. One Nation is right—and we’re fighting for Australians, not foreign billionaires or globalist agendas.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

80,917 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jameela Jamil has been gifted every opportunity by Britain - a great education, a career lifted by DEI, indoor plumbing - and yet she still appeared on a podcast this week to condemn Brits as "truly the most evil people in history" who owe India "43 trillion" in reparations. But was British colonialism as horrific as we're told? Britain brought India: - One of the world's largest rail networks, facilitating trade across the sub-continent; - A legal and justice system essential for a fair society and the enforcement of contracts; - A professional bureaucracy and civil service that ran the country; - Infrastructure: roads, bridges, ports, canals, telegraph lines and electricity networks; - A unified currency, postal service and national market which reduced barriers to trade; - English, which spanned the hundreds of existing languages to become a common administrative and commercial language; - Universities, medical colleges and higher education; - Democracy; - Vaccination campaigns, clean water and medical institutions. And we brought India sanitation and flushing toilets, although I respect the tenacity of many Indians in sticking to their ancient culture of defecating in the open. According to the BBC, more than half a billion people in India still "continue to defecate in gutters, behind bushes or in open water bodies". You do you, guys. Is the castigation of Britain just fashionable, an easy way to get attention? If Jameela hates Brits so much then why, like fellow non-white anti-Western firebrands AOC and Ash Sarkar, does she have a white boyfriend? I wonder if they all realise the damage they're doing to their own cause.

Jameela Jamil has been gifted every opportunity by Britain - a great education, a career lifted by DEI, indoor plumbing - and yet she still appeared on a podcast this week to condemn Brits as "truly the most evil people in history" who owe India "43 trillion" in reparations. But was British colonialism as horrific as we're told? Britain brought India: - One of the world's largest rail networks, facilitating trade across the sub-continent; - A legal and justice system essential for a fair society and the enforcement of contracts; - A professional bureaucracy and civil service that ran the country; - Infrastructure: roads, bridges, ports, canals, telegraph lines and electricity networks; - A unified currency, postal service and national market which reduced barriers to trade; - English, which spanned the hundreds of existing languages to become a common administrative and commercial language; - Universities, medical colleges and higher education; - Democracy; - Vaccination campaigns, clean water and medical institutions. And we brought India sanitation and flushing toilets, although I respect the tenacity of many Indians in sticking to their ancient culture of defecating in the open. According to the BBC, more than half a billion people in India still "continue to defecate in gutters, behind bushes or in open water bodies". You do you, guys. Is the castigation of Britain just fashionable, an easy way to get attention? If Jameela hates Brits so much then why, like fellow non-white anti-Western firebrands AOC and Ash Sarkar, does she have a white boyfriend? I wonder if they all realise the damage they're doing to their own cause.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

39,467 次观看 • 10 天前

People who say BYD is beating Tesla in China are most likely the same ones saying Samsung is beating Apple bc of market share. The reality is BYD sells more units largely by flooding the market with cheaper, lower margin cars. While Tesla sells fewer units, but they focus on higher quality vehicles, better software, global scalability, and profitability. Tesla still generates FAR more profit per vehicle, has world leading margins, and owns the full ecosystem from hardware, software, AI, charging, data, and manufacturing technology. Market share without profit is just volume for volume’s sake, and in my opinion, that’s not winning. This is the same story as Samsung vs Apple. Samsung often leads in unit shipments by selling tons of low and mid range phones. And Apple sells fewer phones, yet captures the majority of the entire industry’s profits. This is bc Apple has premium products and the ecosystem locks in customers with software dominance and customer & brand loyalty. Trust me, no serious investor thinks Samsung is beating Apple just bc it ships more phones. Even Elon called this out years ago saying scaling volume is much easier than building great products that people love, make real profits, and at scale. This is excruciatingly hard. So when someone tells me that BYD is beating Tesla bc of market share. What they’re really telling me is they are clueless on how businesses actually succeed. Tesla is the clear winner vs BYD.

Teslaconomics

55,143 次观看 • 6 个月前

The Great Silence: 850,000 Jews Ethnically Cleansed from Arab & Muslim Lands While the world talks endlessly about Palestinian “refugees,” it has nearly erased one of the largest forced migrations of the 20th century - this is the story the media and academics almost never tell. At the moment of Israel’s birth in 1948, ancient Jewish communities existed across the Middle East and North Africa — some dating back more than 2,000 years, long before Islam arrived. Iraq: ~150,000 Jews Egypt: ~75,000–80,000 Yemen: ~55,000 Libya: ~38,000 Syria: ~30,000 Morocco: ~265,000 Algeria, Tunisia, and others: tens of thousands more In total, nearly one million Jews lived in these lands. Within years, the vast majority were gone — driven out by pogroms, discriminatory laws, arrests, property confiscation, and open violence. The collapse began even before Israel’s independence. In 1941, the Farhud pogrom in Baghdad saw Arabs murder more than 180 Jews and destroyed hundreds of Jewish home. After 1948, the pressure became unbearable: Jews were stripped of citizenship, jobs, and property in country after country. Synagogues were bombed, businesses boycotted, and ancient communities faced mass arrests and executions. Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Libya, Syria, Algeria, and Morocco all saw their Jewish populations virtually wiped out. By the 1970s these communities — some of the oldest in the world — had been reduced to a few hundred souls at most. Today the numbers are staggering in their smallness: Iraq: fewer than 5 Jews remain Egypt: fewer than 10 Syria: fewer than 10 Libya: none Yemen: virtually none Meanwhile, the financial cost was enormous. Jews fleeing Iran and the Arab world left behind an estimated $150 billion worth of property and assets (a conservative 2019 figure; some Israeli government analyses put the unadjusted total closer to $250 billion). Homes, businesses, synagogues, hospitals, schools — all confiscated by Arab governments. Not a single dollar has ever been repaid. Not one Arab state has offered compensation or even acknowledgment. Meanwhile, the UN has passed more than 115 resolutions specifically about Palestinian refugees. Not one UN resolution has ever mentioned the Jewish refugees from Arab lands. Israel absorbed ~586,000 of these refugees in the first few years — nearly doubling the young country’s population — with almost no international help. There was no UNRWA-style agency for them. No endless resolutions. No global outcry about a “right of return.” They were simply absorbed, rebuilt their lives, and became full members of Israeli society. The contrast is stark. The Palestinian refugee issue receives constant international attention and funding. The Jewish refugees from Arab lands — who suffered a genuine ethnic cleansing — have been almost entirely erased from the narrative. This was not a natural migration. It was the deliberate destruction of ancient Jewish communities that had lived in these lands for centuries before Islam even existed. Their stories deserve to be remembered.

The Great Silence: 850,000 Jews Ethnically Cleansed from Arab & Muslim Lands While the world talks endlessly about Palestinian “refugees,” it has nearly erased one of the largest forced migrations of the 20th century - this is the story the media and academics almost never tell. At the moment of Israel’s birth in 1948, ancient Jewish communities existed across the Middle East and North Africa — some dating back more than 2,000 years, long before Islam arrived. Iraq: ~150,000 Jews Egypt: ~75,000–80,000 Yemen: ~55,000 Libya: ~38,000 Syria: ~30,000 Morocco: ~265,000 Algeria, Tunisia, and others: tens of thousands more In total, nearly one million Jews lived in these lands. Within years, the vast majority were gone — driven out by pogroms, discriminatory laws, arrests, property confiscation, and open violence. The collapse began even before Israel’s independence. In 1941, the Farhud pogrom in Baghdad saw Arabs murder more than 180 Jews and destroyed hundreds of Jewish home. After 1948, the pressure became unbearable: Jews were stripped of citizenship, jobs, and property in country after country. Synagogues were bombed, businesses boycotted, and ancient communities faced mass arrests and executions. Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Libya, Syria, Algeria, and Morocco all saw their Jewish populations virtually wiped out. By the 1970s these communities — some of the oldest in the world — had been reduced to a few hundred souls at most. Today the numbers are staggering in their smallness: Iraq: fewer than 5 Jews remain Egypt: fewer than 10 Syria: fewer than 10 Libya: none Yemen: virtually none Meanwhile, the financial cost was enormous. Jews fleeing Iran and the Arab world left behind an estimated $150 billion worth of property and assets (a conservative 2019 figure; some Israeli government analyses put the unadjusted total closer to $250 billion). Homes, businesses, synagogues, hospitals, schools — all confiscated by Arab governments. Not a single dollar has ever been repaid. Not one Arab state has offered compensation or even acknowledgment. Meanwhile, the UN has passed more than 115 resolutions specifically about Palestinian refugees. Not one UN resolution has ever mentioned the Jewish refugees from Arab lands. Israel absorbed ~586,000 of these refugees in the first few years — nearly doubling the young country’s population — with almost no international help. There was no UNRWA-style agency for them. No endless resolutions. No global outcry about a “right of return.” They were simply absorbed, rebuilt their lives, and became full members of Israeli society. The contrast is stark. The Palestinian refugee issue receives constant international attention and funding. The Jewish refugees from Arab lands — who suffered a genuine ethnic cleansing — have been almost entirely erased from the narrative. This was not a natural migration. It was the deliberate destruction of ancient Jewish communities that had lived in these lands for centuries before Islam even existed. Their stories deserve to be remembered.

Captain Allen

40,838 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jensen Huang just said the most dangerous thing about AI that no one is sitting with. Huang: “AI basically does most of our coding. And yet we’re hiring more engineers than ever. We have more challenges than ever. We have bigger dreams than ever.” Every engineer at NVIDIA uses AI. AI writes most of their code. This is the company building the infrastructure behind every major AI system on Earth. Closer to this technology than any organization alive. They’re hiring more people. Not fewer. Every conversation about AI is built around subtraction. Fewer jobs. Fewer workers. Fewer humans in the loop. Jensen just told you the opposite is true. Huang: “Suppose we infused AI into this country, and as a result of that, we are doing things faster than ever before. Our ambition is greater than ever before. Our expectations are greater than ever before. How is that a bad condition for our country?” He’s not defending AI. He’s describing what happens inside the organizations that actually use it. It doesn’t make them leaner. It makes them hungrier. More ambition. More speed. More appetite for problems no one would have touched five years ago. The car didn’t make humans travel less. The internet didn’t make humans communicate less. No tool in human history has ever made humans want less. AI will not be the exception. Huang: “Prior to that, it’s been incredible but not useful. Now it’s useful and incredible.” Six months. That’s how fast AI crossed from impressive demo to daily weapon. The companies that adopted it didn’t shrink. They expanded. Compressed timelines. Started chasing problems they never would have attempted. The companies that ignored it stayed exactly where they were. That gap compounds. Every day a company uses AI to move faster, it learns something the one standing still never will. That knowledge stacks. That speed stacks. That ambition stacks. Jensen isn’t warning about a future where machines take your job. He’s describing a present where the companies using AI are becoming so fast and so hungry that standing still is already fatal. By the time you notice, it’s over. You were never going to be replaced by AI. You were going to be erased by someone it made hungrier than you.

Jensen Huang just said the most dangerous thing about AI that no one is sitting with. Huang: “AI basically does most of our coding. And yet we’re hiring more engineers than ever. We have more challenges than ever. We have bigger dreams than ever.” Every engineer at NVIDIA uses AI. AI writes most of their code. This is the company building the infrastructure behind every major AI system on Earth. Closer to this technology than any organization alive. They’re hiring more people. Not fewer. Every conversation about AI is built around subtraction. Fewer jobs. Fewer workers. Fewer humans in the loop. Jensen just told you the opposite is true. Huang: “Suppose we infused AI into this country, and as a result of that, we are doing things faster than ever before. Our ambition is greater than ever before. Our expectations are greater than ever before. How is that a bad condition for our country?” He’s not defending AI. He’s describing what happens inside the organizations that actually use it. It doesn’t make them leaner. It makes them hungrier. More ambition. More speed. More appetite for problems no one would have touched five years ago. The car didn’t make humans travel less. The internet didn’t make humans communicate less. No tool in human history has ever made humans want less. AI will not be the exception. Huang: “Prior to that, it’s been incredible but not useful. Now it’s useful and incredible.” Six months. That’s how fast AI crossed from impressive demo to daily weapon. The companies that adopted it didn’t shrink. They expanded. Compressed timelines. Started chasing problems they never would have attempted. The companies that ignored it stayed exactly where they were. That gap compounds. Every day a company uses AI to move faster, it learns something the one standing still never will. That knowledge stacks. That speed stacks. That ambition stacks. Jensen isn’t warning about a future where machines take your job. He’s describing a present where the companies using AI are becoming so fast and so hungry that standing still is already fatal. By the time you notice, it’s over. You were never going to be replaced by AI. You were going to be erased by someone it made hungrier than you.

Dustin

12,200 次观看 • 3 个月前

Canadian doctors performed a full choreographed hip-hop dance INSIDE the official COP30 plenary in Brazil — demanding the world immediately “phase out all fossil fuels now.” White coats, beats, and “health justice” lyrics on the official UN stage. Meanwhile, literally 72 hours before COP30 started, Bill Gates dropped his blunt pre-summit letter to world leaders: “We have to stop pretending we can get to zero with today’s technology. It’s not going to happen.” He called for a total strategic reset toward poverty, adaptation, and innovation instead of suicidal timelines. Hard numbers that don’t care about dance moves: - IEA Net Zero 2050 pathway: close ~2,000 large fossil power plants EVERY YEAR from today + invest $5.7 TRILLION annually (more than the entire EU budget). - Global oil demand: new all-time record in 2024, still rising. - China 2024: 94 GW new coal approved — two big coal plants per week, more than the rest of the planet combined. - India: coal fleet growing faster than renewables. 2024 CO₂ emissions (Mt): China alone: ~12,000 India: ~2,800 China + India: ~14,800 US + EU27 + Japan + Canada + UK + Australia combined: ~9,300 Two countries now emit 59% MORE than the entire developed West — and their curve is still pointing up. So while privileged doctors dance in air-conditioned UN halls flown in on jet fuel, the actual emissions growth is happening in Asia at wartime speed. Real doctors keep the lights on in operating rooms. Performative ones do TikTok routines at $2,000/night climate summits. Energy poverty kills 3–5 million people every single year. Air pollution kills fewer than that — and it’s already falling fast in the West. Which side are you on? Drop your take

Canadian doctors performed a full choreographed hip-hop dance INSIDE the official COP30 plenary in Brazil — demanding the world immediately “phase out all fossil fuels now.” White coats, beats, and “health justice” lyrics on the official UN stage. Meanwhile, literally 72 hours before COP30 started, Bill Gates dropped his blunt pre-summit letter to world leaders: “We have to stop pretending we can get to zero with today’s technology. It’s not going to happen.” He called for a total strategic reset toward poverty, adaptation, and innovation instead of suicidal timelines. Hard numbers that don’t care about dance moves: - IEA Net Zero 2050 pathway: close ~2,000 large fossil power plants EVERY YEAR from today + invest $5.7 TRILLION annually (more than the entire EU budget). - Global oil demand: new all-time record in 2024, still rising. - China 2024: 94 GW new coal approved — two big coal plants per week, more than the rest of the planet combined. - India: coal fleet growing faster than renewables. 2024 CO₂ emissions (Mt): China alone: ~12,000 India: ~2,800 China + India: ~14,800 US + EU27 + Japan + Canada + UK + Australia combined: ~9,300 Two countries now emit 59% MORE than the entire developed West — and their curve is still pointing up. So while privileged doctors dance in air-conditioned UN halls flown in on jet fuel, the actual emissions growth is happening in Asia at wartime speed. Real doctors keep the lights on in operating rooms. Performative ones do TikTok routines at $2,000/night climate summits. Energy poverty kills 3–5 million people every single year. Air pollution kills fewer than that — and it’s already falling fast in the West. Which side are you on? Drop your take

Camus

36,547 次观看 • 8 个月前

“Australia’s migration boom helped drive a record $38.2 billion in money sent in overseas remittances last year, including $7.3 billion to India and $5.35 billion to China, according to new analysis. The two countries received nearly one third of all payments by migrants to their home countries in 2024, while Israelis in Australia sent the most per capita, the report by comparison site Money Transfer Australia found. “With net overseas migration expected to reach more than 1.3 million people between the 2023 and 2025 financial years … we believe remittance outflows from Australia will be even higher in 2025,” Mr Gous said.” •••••••••••••••••••• The Australian government needs to crack down on offshore profit shifting. There are three ways this is occurring: 1) Multinationals shifting interest, royalties and rent offshore to minimise their tax paid in Australia. 2) Immigrants particularly those on temporary visas transferring their wages back to home country 3) Companies outsourcing labor offshore and then transferring wages to those countries. All of these methods result in Australia losing jobs, profits and tax revenue. People First is committed to cracking down on this rorting of our wealth and has the knowledge to fix it. If would like to support a party with real substance and real solutions please consider signing up today at

“Australia’s migration boom helped drive a record $38.2 billion in money sent in overseas remittances last year, including $7.3 billion to India and $5.35 billion to China, according to new analysis. The two countries received nearly one third of all payments by migrants to their home countries in 2024, while Israelis in Australia sent the most per capita, the report by comparison site Money Transfer Australia found. “With net overseas migration expected to reach more than 1.3 million people between the 2023 and 2025 financial years … we believe remittance outflows from Australia will be even higher in 2025,” Mr Gous said.” •••••••••••••••••••• The Australian government needs to crack down on offshore profit shifting. There are three ways this is occurring: 1) Multinationals shifting interest, royalties and rent offshore to minimise their tax paid in Australia. 2) Immigrants particularly those on temporary visas transferring their wages back to home country 3) Companies outsourcing labor offshore and then transferring wages to those countries. All of these methods result in Australia losing jobs, profits and tax revenue. People First is committed to cracking down on this rorting of our wealth and has the knowledge to fix it. If would like to support a party with real substance and real solutions please consider signing up today at

Gerard Rennick

126,087 次观看 • 8 个月前