What happens when you give the quant trader’s bible to two frontier AI...

Uploaded: 2026-08-20T16:43:03.000Z
Duration: PT55.366S
Channel: Sarah Chieng

0:38

🚨 Ox Alpha might actually be AGI I gave it and GPT-5.6 Sol (Ultra) the exact same prompt to build a website with cursor-reactive magnetic motion. Ox Alpha delivered faster and, in this test, far more accurately. the motion feels better, the graphics look cleaner, and even the font choices are way ahead of what GPT-5.6 Sol gave me. I’ll drop the exact prompt I used in the comments for anyone who wants to try it.

m0h

59,959 views • 16 days ago

10:23

GPT-5.6 Sol just changed how I build websites with AI. In this full 10-minute video, I test Sol and Terra inside Codex to build a cinematic landing page from a video reference. I cover: → Which GPT-5.6 model to use → How I analyze a full website experience → How I recreate the layout, motion and interactions → Why better prompting matters more than one-shot results → How to avoid generic AI slop The model matters—but the way you guide it matters even more. Watch the full process below 👇 Want the free template and the exact prompt I used? They’re available exclusively in the description of the YouTube version:

Sourasith

261,047 views • 1 month ago

18:49

I couldn't believe the results of this benchmarking test. I blind-tested 6 frontier models — Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, Fable 5, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.2, and Kimi 2.5 — on knowledge work, not engineering. Writing. Analysis. Design. Vibe coding. Subagent simulations. The stuff we actually do all day. Same prompts, each model running its own subagent, every output graded blind before the labels were revealed. The results: → GLM 5.2 (the dirt-cheap open-source model from China) took first → Sonnet 5 took second, beating Fable 5 for knowledge work → Opus 4.8 got whooped Then I had Composer 2.5 judge every output independently — and it picked Fable 5 almost across the board. My blind picks and the AI judge completely disagreed. Full breakdown, method, and prompts in the video below. Which model are you running as your daily driver right now?

JJ Englert

10,737 views • 2 months ago

1:11

THIS GUY PUT FABLE, GPT 5.6 SOL, AND OPUS IN ONE SHARED CHAT AND HAS THEM TAG EACH OTHER LIKE COWORKERS instead of running three separate models in three separate windows and copy pasting between them, they all sit in one room and talk to each other > you tag whichever model you want and only that one responds > they tag each other too, so fable can hand something to opus, opus can pull in sol for a second opinion > each agent only sees the messages theyre mentioned in, but you get to read everything > he had them running and orchestrating together for more than a day straight the best part is how different each one actually behaves: > fable is the creative product manager. huge context window so it remembers everything, and its the one finding the out of the box solutions > sol is the obsessive tech lead. it will trace every bug to the exact source and stress test every edge case before writing a single line > opus is the workhorse engineer. smart enough for almost anything, and it constantly questions things, which forces the other two to re-examine their own solutions its like managing a team. one plans, one writes the code, one reviews it, and they hand work back and forth without you playing middleman everyone else is arguing about which model is best right now, but the real play is making them work together at the same time

Om Patel

22,998 views • 1 month ago

1:21

Three skills I use every day in Claude Code and Codex to solve my hardest problems: 1️⃣ /agent-watchdog When I have one agent like Codex working on a task and I don't fully trust it's going to do everything right, I'll open up another one like Claude Code and tell it to watchdog the Codex thread. You can copy the Codex deep link into Claude Code and it'll look at the prompt you sent, watch the Codex thread until it's done, then compare the Codex solution to how it was planning to solve it and automatically fix anything that Codex missed. It can also test the work of the other agent end-to-end. Similar to the idea of OpenRouter's new Fusion feature, I've definitely found that two models thinking through a problem and checking each other's work can be wildly more impactful than just one. 2️⃣ /plan-arbiter Similar ideas as /agent-watchdog - but with this one you have both make plans, compare plans, negotiate the differences, and make a final plan to execute. I find Claude Code is better at writing plans, but Codex is faster and cheaper to execute on them. Then I usually have Claude Code watchdog the Codex work and fix anything that was missed. 3️⃣ /read-the-damn-docs One thing that drives me crazy with coding agents is they're so reluctant to look up docs. They'll just guess and guess and guess at the right API surface for things, or the right solution to an integration of two things. Once I explicitly tell it to look up the docs, it says "Oh, I see the answer," and it fixes the problem. So I made the /read-the-damn-docs skill. Add it and your agents will know when and how to do efficient web searches to look up docs for the types of problems you really should look up docs for. All of these are totally open source over on my GitHub. If you try them, let me know your feedback. Will link to them below:

Steve (Builder.io)

43,089 views • 2 months ago

57:38

Fable and gpt-5.6 are both great models. But one has to be better, right? What if you could only have one? I did my best to break down the strengths and weaknesses of both, and end with my personal choice (which will likely surprise you)

Theo - t3.gg

126,343 views • 1 month ago

0:27

Found a way to get $125-$200 in FREE ai credits for gpt-5.6 sol, claude opus 5 and opus 4.8 😳 agentrouter is a non-profit version of openrouter. one api key, no card. credits land on your account at signup. what you get for $0: -$125-200 in credits on signup (github only) -claude opus 5, gpt-5.6 sol, opus 4.8 through one key -free models -openai-compatible (works with anything) what this replaces: -paid frontier API costs for coding agents -claude opus 4.8: $15/M in, $75/M out -gpt-5.6 sol: $25/M out how to grab yours (2 min): 1. go to → sign in with github (important) 2. console → create your api key 3. base url: 4. pick a model and go Works in hermes, claude code, cursor, aider and any openai-compatible tools Important: github-only signup, older accounts get the full credit, fresh ones may get less. credits are one-time. referral adds +$100 use this before they tighten the offer

painn

109,551 views • 1 month ago

1:21

-> If you’re looking for a job -> right now, there are three -> Claude certifications that -> you should do this week -> and then put them on your -> LinkedIn, they are all -> completely free, and they -> come from Anthropic, -> which is the company -> that's behind Claude. -> And jobs that need AI skills -> pay 56% more than jobs -> that don’t, So, I think -> spending a few hours this -> week to knock out these -> three courses and then -> add them to your LinkedIn -> will really go a long way -> The first one is called -> Claude 101, and this -> essentially just goes over -> what Claude is and when -> you should use chat versus -> co-work versus code, how -> projects and skills work, -> and how to connect all -> of your tools and apps -> like Gmail, Notion, Slack, -> and other tools that you use -> And the second course -> is called AI Fluency -> Framework and Foundations -> Inside this one, there are -> 13 lessons on how to -> actually work with AI. -> It goes over things like -> effective prompting, critical -> thinking on the outputs, -> and it has a vocabulary -> sheet that you’ll want -> to read and save for later. -> And the third one is -> Intro to Claude Cowork -> Claude Cowork is where -> you can actually get stuff -> done with Claude. -> So, this course covers -> projects, skills, plug-ins, -> scheduling tasks, handling -> files, and then also how -> to pick the right model -> for the job, and then when -> you finish these courses, -> just go to your LinkedIn -> and go to your profile -> Click "Add section," and -> then go to "Licenses -> and certifications" and -> add all three of these. -> And then when you land -> the interview, you should -> talk about your AI fluency -> often as you possibly can -> I feel pretty confident that -> you’ll truly be able to -> differentiate yourself -> from other candidates -> if you do this

BeingInvested

13,130 views • 3 months ago

0:47

🚨You can now use the new upcoming OpenAI model GPT 5.2 inside Cursor. Here is the full walkthrough. - Open the editor, go to settings and then the model tab. Add a custom model and enter the text "gpt-5.2-high" and "gpt-5.2". - After that you can select the model and ask questions. To verify, I started my test on the usage page which had zero gpt-5.2-high requests and consumption. After the test I could see the details in usage and the cost incurred while using it. Enjoy

AshutoshShrivastava

424,035 views • 9 months ago

3:46

I built an agent that answers machine-learning questions. It's autonomous, and the best part is that I built the whole thing without writing a single line of Python code. Here is what I did and how I did it: Over a year ago, a friend and I built a site that publishes multi-choice questions. You get a new one every day. I decided to have GPT-3.5 answer questions. Here is what I needed to build: 1. Connect to the site's API to retrieve today's question 2. Extract the question and the potential choices 3. Connect to OpenAI's API and ask GPT-3.5 to answer the question 4. Parse the answer from the model 5. Submit the answer back to the API to get the score Not difficult. Likely several hours of work. But I didn't have to write any code. I built the whole thing by dragging and dropping components using Vellum is a YC-backed platform for developers to build LLM applications. They are the only ones I've seen offering this functionality. They sponsored this post, and their team helped me with all my questions while I built this. I created a workflow. The platform supports several node types to build whatever you have in mind. I show how I put the whole thing together in the attached video. The only code I had to write was a few lines of Jinja to parse and transform the API and the LLM results. There are three lessons I want to share from this experience: First, the best possible code is the one you didn't write. I'm a big fan of no-code tools because they help me materialize my ideas fast. They help product people, designers, and no coders collaborate on the solution. Second, Large Language Models are sensitive to how you prompt them. Small changes to prompts can make a big difference in results. This is more pronounced when you are building a multi-step workflow. Third, automated testing and evaluation for prompts is critical. There aren't many companies thinking about this. They'll have a hard time moving from a demo phase. The attached video will show you what I did.

Santiago

309,825 views • 2 years ago

0:31

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 views • 1 month ago

8:42

Quick video on how I used claude code, icon composer, and my iOS app to make my app icon. I got a ton of questions about how I did it: It started with two questions: can you reshape the route to approximate a "p" more but like a character of a p not a real "p" as a test icon? "Can you give me a settings sheet where I can parametrically create The loop that I want to make... like, give me every possible parameter for the loop in the three d scene, and then make sure I can copy those values to you. And we could take that and implement it. I think that might be faster for me to be able to manipulate a p shaped loop."

Kris Puckett

24,214 views • 1 month ago

34:32

THE INTERVIEW!! I sat down this weekend with the CEO of Halcyon Trader Funding to discuss all of the details of their upcoming launch this week. I asked all the questions we need to know (How will the firm benefit traders, how do we get our money, don't prop firms make money if traders fail, etc...) Steve had genuine answers for all of my questions and I am excited to help bring Halcyon to market! I think this is something we can all make money with and I look forward to seeing traders' success with a new prop firm truly for the traders! If you are new to futures trading or have no idea what prop firms are, I encourage you to listen all the way through. If you are experienced with prop firms, I encourage you to listen to what Steve plans to offer and get excited with me! Unedited, unscripted real questions. Thank you for taking the time to sit down with me. Thank you to the viewers as well for taking the time to watch. Let's profit!!

Gary 🍀

24,939 views • 1 year ago

24:51

BIG NEWS: Opus 5 is here...and I hate working with it. And yet in a blind taste test, I ranked it above every other model (even Fable and my beloved GPT-5.6) What I cover in my day 0 review: 00:00 Why I have model fatigue 03:15 First impressions 06:12 Opus 5's neurotic personality 14:39 Why claude slop makes my blood boil 16:55 The mechanics behind my blind benchmark 18:30 The leaderboard reveal 23:25 Final thoughts and how I'll actually use Opus 5 With all the twists, turns, and (a little bit of) silliness, this is one of my favorite review eps yet.

claire vo 🖤

164,869 views • 1 month ago

0:53

THIS TOP-TRADER’S 3 CLAUDE PROMPTS TURN ANY STOCK INTO A PROFITABLE INVESTMENT IN 5 MINUTES. Here is how you can become profitable and analyze any stocks in 5 minutes using Claude. This is the exact 3-prompt framework I use to break down stocks fast: >Why is the stock moving? Claude explains the investment thesis, key catalysts, risks, and what Wall Street is saying. >Is the business healthy - and is the stock cheap? Claude checks fundamentals, valuation, and compares it against 5 competitors. >What happens next? Claude builds bull, base, and bear case scenarios - including potential price targets and when to exit. I use this to build my own investment theses before going deeper. Want the full Claude prompt pack? Comment “PROMPT” and I’ll DM it to you. Follow for more AI investing hacks.

kiosa

19,659 views • 3 months ago

1:48

Paul Pierce on why college stars fail in the NBA: “Because you have to realize you got to make a new adjustment. It starts like, I tell people like I was a high school All-American and so when I got to college, it was like it starts over. They don’t care. You know, they don’t like you was a top player in high school. This is now you’re playing against grown men. And then I was college first team All-American. Then you get to the league and it’s like they don’t care. You start over again. And so what you got to understand, everybody in the NBA was stars were before the NBA. When you look at a guy and I always like to use Pat Beverly, for example, Pat Beverly averaged 30 something in high school, 40 like and then, you know, once he start leveling up and leveling up, everybody did that. So this where you see, you know, people try to find their niche.” (Via No Fouls Given)

NBA Courtside

427,769 views • 5 months ago

0:51

OpenAI's Tibo reveals he has ADHD and thrives on context-switching but says Ultrafast is delightful when he wants to focus on a single thing Tibo: People have different kinds of preferences on whether they like to be, you know, mono-threaded, as we talked about, or multitask a lot. For folks who like to multitask a lot, you don't benefit as much from Ultrafast. Berman: Some people don't like to change context all the time. Where do you fall on that spectrum? Tibo: I have ADHD, so I context-switch all the time. Berman: It's funny, 'cause I also have ADHD and I actually don't want to context-switch all the time. That's really hard for me. I want to focus on two to three, and that's why I was so excited about Ultrafast. That's fascinating that you're the opposite there. Tibo: You know, I thrive in context-switching and making lots of little decisions. But sometimes I do want to just stay focused on one thing, and then Ultrafast is just delightful, because it just keeps you right there in the flow.

Fireside Alpha

16,006 views • 16 days ago

0:40

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,254 views • 1 month ago

0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 views • 2 months ago

Live Cam

Video Failed to Load

What happens when you give the quant trader’s bible to two frontier AI models? The Green Book is what traders use to prepare for firms like SIG and HRT, where I interned. And in high-frequency quant trading, being right isn’t enough. You have to be first. Inside Codex, I... show more

Sarah Chieng

Anya Rossi• Live Now

0 Comments

Related Videos

Fable and gpt-5.6 are both great models. But one has to be better, right? What if you could only have one? I did my best to break down the strengths and weaknesses of both, and end with my personal choice (which will likely surprise you)